Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Sam Altman just stood before the UN Security Council and warned that humanity could lose control of AI. "We could lose control of the future to AI. The risk is that it moves so fast that people can no longer follow what's happening or intervene when needed." He told...

10,577 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

waterr profil fotoğrafı
waterr3 gün önce

This is so he can call for regulation that gives his company the advantage. New competitors will face challenges and won't be able to compete with already established companies.

◉●○•° profil fotoğrafı
◉●○•°3 gün önce

@stephwakefield_

Varshith N Neelakanti profil fotoğrafı
Varshith N Neelakanti2 gün önce

then we need to build a stronger protocols through it

AKHIL profil fotoğrafı
AKHIL3 gün önce

Fear mongering

Alok profil fotoğrafı
Alok3 gün önce

He is the same guy turned non profit into for profit. Elon musk has made open ai for some reason .

Mr Toad 🐸 profil fotoğrafı
Mr Toad 🐸2 gün önce

Any thing wrong can he just simply turn off the datacenter ? Otherwise existing law should be sufficient to put him in jail if his model committed serious crimes

rishabh profil fotoğrafı
rishabh3 gün önce

That distinction—governments, not labs, set safeguards—is the line worth pressing. If labs can pause voluntarily, they can also publish the measurable triggers, eval results, and incident thresholds that let the public verify a pause is real.

Vaibhav Sisinty profil fotoğrafı
Vaibhav Sisinty2 gün önce

I share tools & Information like this daily in our free AI WhatsApp community. 200,000+ people already in. Join for free :

DesignSubway profil fotoğrafı
DesignSubway2 gün önce

AI is moving incredibly fast, and conversations like this matter. Innovation is exciting, but building responsibly with thoughtful safeguards will be just as important as what comes next.

JT Maher, attorney, profil fotoğrafı
JT Maher, attorney,3 gün önce

. . . Therefore give me more funding to pretend to control what I already accepted funding to develop. Or else. The long con fleeces the mark coming and going and makes them think you did them a favor.

Fabien Snauwaert profil fotoğrafı
Fabien Snauwaert2 gün önce

has the UN heard of oligopolies?

Benzer Videolar

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,208 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce