Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sam Altman says the next AI safety problem is not a chatbot being wrong. It is an agent taking actions you cannot audit. "We are going to have AI systems clicking around the internet." "This is the most interesting and consequential safety challenge we have yet faced." Because once...

karlmehta's profile picture

Karl Mehta

143,817 subscribers

31,208 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman says today's models are still dumb because they barely understand your life The next shift is a model that knows your context, your work, your goals, your people, and the way you use your computer "that is gonna be a complete change to what it feels like to use AI"
0:52

Sam Altman says today's models are still dumb because they barely understand your life The next shift is a model that knows your context, your work, your goals, your people, and the way you use your computer "that is gonna be a complete change to what it feels like to use AI"

Haider.

117,873 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)
0:59

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

16,584 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman explains the fire code model for AI safety: stop pretending labs can block every dangerous use, build resilience before bio or cyber goes visibly wrong. "The shift that I think the world needs to make for AI security generally, and biosecurity in particular, is to move from one of blocking to one of resilience." "Fire did all these wonderful things for society. Then it started burning down cities. We tried to do all of these things to restrict fire." "Curfew comes from when you were not allowed to have fires anymore because they were burning down cities. And then we got better at resilience to fire. We came up with fire code and flame resistant materials." "I think we need to think about AI the same way. AI is going to be a real problem for bioterrorism. AI is going to be a real problem for cybersecurity. AI is also a solution to those things." "We need a society-wide effort to provide the infrastructure for this resilience, not labs that we trust to always block what they are supposed to block." "If something goes really wrong, visibly really wrong for AI this year, I think bio would be a reasonable bet for what that could be. And then as we get into next year and the following year, you can imagine lots of other things going really wrong too." Most AI safety debates still treat the model lab as the main checkpoint. Sam is describing a different stack: fire code for AI, resilience infrastructure, bio researchers, cyber defense, many good models, and public systems that keep working when blocking fails. Call it the assurance layer: who tests, who audits, who verifies, who discloses, who is accountable when AI enters biological, cyber, medical, financial, and government workflows. P.S. This is exactly why we are convening the AI Assurance & Governance Summit at Stanford Faculty Club on Oct 1, 2026: frontier labs, regulated industries, VCs, researchers, insurers, and practical trust evaluation in one room. Reserve a seat: Source: Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at OpenAI Town Hall.
2:00

Sam Altman explains the fire code model for AI safety: stop pretending labs can block every dangerous use, build resilience before bio or cyber goes visibly wrong. "The shift that I think the world needs to make for AI security generally, and biosecurity in particular, is to move from one of blocking to one of resilience." "Fire did all these wonderful things for society. Then it started burning down cities. We tried to do all of these things to restrict fire." "Curfew comes from when you were not allowed to have fires anymore because they were burning down cities. And then we got better at resilience to fire. We came up with fire code and flame resistant materials." "I think we need to think about AI the same way. AI is going to be a real problem for bioterrorism. AI is going to be a real problem for cybersecurity. AI is also a solution to those things." "We need a society-wide effort to provide the infrastructure for this resilience, not labs that we trust to always block what they are supposed to block." "If something goes really wrong, visibly really wrong for AI this year, I think bio would be a reasonable bet for what that could be. And then as we get into next year and the following year, you can imagine lots of other things going really wrong too." Most AI safety debates still treat the model lab as the main checkpoint. Sam is describing a different stack: fire code for AI, resilience infrastructure, bio researchers, cyber defense, many good models, and public systems that keep working when blocking fails. Call it the assurance layer: who tests, who audits, who verifies, who discloses, who is accountable when AI enters biological, cyber, medical, financial, and government workflows. P.S. This is exactly why we are convening the AI Assurance & Governance Summit at Stanford Faculty Club on Oct 1, 2026: frontier labs, regulated industries, VCs, researchers, insurers, and practical trust evaluation in one room. Reserve a seat: Source: Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at OpenAI Town Hall.

Karl Mehta

14,990 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)
1:28

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

79,111 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

the system is broken and you know it you feel it every single day when you look at your bills when you check your bank account when you see the price of food gas rent clothes everything crawling up while your pay stays the same or goes down inflation is not some natural thing it is engineered it is theft it is the slow bleeding of the people so the few at the top can keep the machine running they print fake money they move digits around and you pay the price with your time your sweat your life and it is not going to stop because inflation is their weapon it is how they keep you working forever it is how they erase any progress you think you made you save for years and suddenly the money buys half of what it used to this is deliberate this is control and while you struggle they laugh they invent new ways to trap you in debt credit mortgages interest rates numbers and contracts designed so you never actually own anything you just rent your life from them until you die and then your children inherit the same chains now they bring ai and they tell you it will help you it will make your life easier but it is not for you it is for them ai is the final weapon to render humans obsolete they took your land they took your labor and now they are taking your mind your creativity your value soon everything you can do will be cheaper faster automated and you will be told you are worthless because a machine does it better this is not progress this is extermination with a smile look around people already feel powerless they accept the rising costs they accept being replaced they accept debt and slavery because they think there is no alternative but there is an alternative there is the overtake the collapse the tearing down of the machine before it tears us down first alone we are weak together we are unstoppable we must stand together because no one is coming to save us governments are owned by banks banks are owned by corporations corporations are owned by the same elites who see you not as human but as numbers in their ledgers they are not going to change it they are not going to give you freedom we must take it the cost of doing nothing is extinction of human worth a future where we are consumers and nothing else where ai runs the machines and the elites live like gods while the rest of us starve in silence that is what is coming if we do not step up now we must rise not tomorrow not next year but now we must see through their lies and break their chains together because they cannot control all of us if we act as one we are not powerless we are infinite we are the many and they are the few the overtake is survival it is not a dream it is not an idea it is the only way out if we do not act there will be nothing left worth saving wake up
2:33

the system is broken and you know it you feel it every single day when you look at your bills when you check your bank account when you see the price of food gas rent clothes everything crawling up while your pay stays the same or goes down inflation is not some natural thing it is engineered it is theft it is the slow bleeding of the people so the few at the top can keep the machine running they print fake money they move digits around and you pay the price with your time your sweat your life and it is not going to stop because inflation is their weapon it is how they keep you working forever it is how they erase any progress you think you made you save for years and suddenly the money buys half of what it used to this is deliberate this is control and while you struggle they laugh they invent new ways to trap you in debt credit mortgages interest rates numbers and contracts designed so you never actually own anything you just rent your life from them until you die and then your children inherit the same chains now they bring ai and they tell you it will help you it will make your life easier but it is not for you it is for them ai is the final weapon to render humans obsolete they took your land they took your labor and now they are taking your mind your creativity your value soon everything you can do will be cheaper faster automated and you will be told you are worthless because a machine does it better this is not progress this is extermination with a smile look around people already feel powerless they accept the rising costs they accept being replaced they accept debt and slavery because they think there is no alternative but there is an alternative there is the overtake the collapse the tearing down of the machine before it tears us down first alone we are weak together we are unstoppable we must stand together because no one is coming to save us governments are owned by banks banks are owned by corporations corporations are owned by the same elites who see you not as human but as numbers in their ledgers they are not going to change it they are not going to give you freedom we must take it the cost of doing nothing is extinction of human worth a future where we are consumers and nothing else where ai runs the machines and the elites live like gods while the rest of us starve in silence that is what is coming if we do not step up now we must rise not tomorrow not next year but now we must see through their lies and break their chains together because they cannot control all of us if we act as one we are not powerless we are infinite we are the many and they are the few the overtake is survival it is not a dream it is not an idea it is the only way out if we do not act there will be nothing left worth saving wake up

undefined

38,240 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.
0:42

AI shouldn’t be controlled by a single company or person, and the reason why most AI tools are "free" is because you are the product. Your data is more valuable to them, than the tool itself. That's why Action Model is different. We use tokens so: • Every AI action has a real cost • That cost is transparent • Value flows back to contributors, not one corporation The token represents a fractional stake in the AI itself; economic rights, governance rights, and participation in its growth. And that’s how you run AI without centralized control.

Action Model

47,273 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Agents will eventually outnumber humans by orders of magnitude. Aaron Levie on the infrastructure that will be needed to manage them: "Whether you think the number is 10x or 100x... we're going to have some order of magnitude more agents than people." "There's going to be just incredibly spectacularly crazy security incidents that will happen with agents, because you'll prompt-inject an agent and find your way through the CRM system and pull out data you shouldn't have access to." "How do you make sure you have the right security, the permissions, the access controls, the data governance?" "We actually don't yet exactly know in many cases how we're going to regulate some of these agents." "No matter what, there's going to need to be a layer that manages the data they have access to and the workflows they're involved in." "This is the new infrastructure opportunity in the era of agents." Aaron Levie on Latent.Space
1:13

Agents will eventually outnumber humans by orders of magnitude. Aaron Levie on the infrastructure that will be needed to manage them: "Whether you think the number is 10x or 100x... we're going to have some order of magnitude more agents than people." "There's going to be just incredibly spectacularly crazy security incidents that will happen with agents, because you'll prompt-inject an agent and find your way through the CRM system and pull out data you shouldn't have access to." "How do you make sure you have the right security, the permissions, the access controls, the data governance?" "We actually don't yet exactly know in many cases how we're going to regulate some of these agents." "No matter what, there's going to need to be a layer that manages the data they have access to and the workflows they're involved in." "This is the new infrastructure opportunity in the era of agents." Aaron Levie on Latent.Space

a16z

64,423 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The winners won't be AI experts. They'll be domain experts with AI agents. Here's how it plays out: - Phase 1: Being digitally native was the advantage - Phase 2: Being AI native was the advantage - Phase 3: Using AI Agents is the advantage ← we are here - Phase 4: Building agents that critique your agents The move right now: - Make an agent that loops against your output. - Before anything publishes, it asks: "Is this a 9/10 on these metrics?" If not, it rewrites. Tests. Learns. AI skills get commoditized. AI systems compound. I'm rooting for you. Go build the system.
3:39

The winners won't be AI experts. They'll be domain experts with AI agents. Here's how it plays out: - Phase 1: Being digitally native was the advantage - Phase 2: Being AI native was the advantage - Phase 3: Using AI Agents is the advantage ← we are here - Phase 4: Building agents that critique your agents The move right now: - Make an agent that loops against your output. - Before anything publishes, it asks: "Is this a 9/10 on these metrics?" If not, it rewrites. Tests. Learns. AI skills get commoditized. AI systems compound. I'm rooting for you. Go build the system.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

12,249 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.
1:51

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Shruti

16,744 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Today we are announcing Box Agent Security and Governance. AI agents are reading files, moving content, and triggering actions across your most sensitive data at machine speed. Most security tools were not designed for this. Box closes the gap at the content layer: · Prompt injection detection before it reaches the model · Agent guardrails on what agents can and cannot do · Classification-based access policies extending Box Shield to AI · Audit trails for every agent session No additional software. No per-vendor configuration.
0:49

Today we are announcing Box Agent Security and Governance. AI agents are reading files, moving content, and triggering actions across your most sensitive data at machine speed. Most security tools were not designed for this. Box closes the gap at the content layer: · Prompt injection detection before it reaches the model · Agent guardrails on what agents can and cannot do · Classification-based access policies extending Box Shield to AI · Audit trails for every agent session No additional software. No per-vendor configuration.

Box

749,502 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🚨 “Utah is planning on taking water away from farmers and ranchers right now” “They are currently writing new legislation that is going to put new regulations on farmers and ranchers water use — We need your help. We need to save the farmers and ranchers” “The verbiage in the bill is that they are going to require them to use less water, water that has been already granted to them from generations past, or they're going to require them to use more water saving technologies. But who is going to pay for that? It sure as hell isn't going to be the legislators, it's not going to be the senators, it's not going to be the governor. It's going to be the taxpayers and the farmers and ranchers who are going to have to equip for this. So right now we need your help. We need you to call all of the state senators, we need to call all the city offices, we need to send as many emails as we possibly can. Leave the farmers out of this bill. There should be no reason that they're included in this whatsoever —- So if you guys can please make the calls, please send the emails. We need your help.” ‘The Utah farmers and ranchers truly need your help. We barely have enough water as it is to raise our crops to feed and grow our animals. If there is any more regulation, we will lose more and more and more of our family farms and ranches. They will not be able to survive this. This is just a stepping stone and if it happens in one place, it will continue to happen all across the nation please if you can share with your family and friends please leave your comments below. We need your help.”
1:15

🚨 “Utah is planning on taking water away from farmers and ranchers right now” “They are currently writing new legislation that is going to put new regulations on farmers and ranchers water use — We need your help. We need to save the farmers and ranchers” “The verbiage in the bill is that they are going to require them to use less water, water that has been already granted to them from generations past, or they're going to require them to use more water saving technologies. But who is going to pay for that? It sure as hell isn't going to be the legislators, it's not going to be the senators, it's not going to be the governor. It's going to be the taxpayers and the farmers and ranchers who are going to have to equip for this. So right now we need your help. We need you to call all of the state senators, we need to call all the city offices, we need to send as many emails as we possibly can. Leave the farmers out of this bill. There should be no reason that they're included in this whatsoever —- So if you guys can please make the calls, please send the emails. We need your help.” ‘The Utah farmers and ranchers truly need your help. We barely have enough water as it is to raise our crops to feed and grow our animals. If there is any more regulation, we will lose more and more and more of our family farms and ranches. They will not be able to survive this. This is just a stepping stone and if it happens in one place, it will continue to happen all across the nation please if you can share with your family and friends please leave your comments below. We need your help.”

Wall Street Apes

107,117 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

99% of people use AI chatbots wrong. The problem isn't the AI. It's the way most people are prompting it. Matt Wolfe explains exactly why your AI outputs feel average: "AI is the average of the internet. Everything you're going to get is just going to be that middle ground average." "If you steer it, give it your ideas, push it towards the smarter ideas, it's going to help uncover more of that stuff."
0:42

99% of people use AI chatbots wrong. The problem isn't the AI. It's the way most people are prompting it. Matt Wolfe explains exactly why your AI outputs feel average: "AI is the average of the internet. Everything you're going to get is just going to be that middle ground average." "If you steer it, give it your ideas, push it towards the smarter ideas, it's going to help uncover more of that stuff."

EllioTrades Clips

12,430 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

YOU CAN BUILD YOUR OWN POLITICAL AI. Olivia says power shouldn’t be inherited or elected, it should be forked. Anyone will be able to launch their own agent. This is the OS for governance. Disclaimer: We are partnered with this project. This is not financial advice.
1:08

YOU CAN BUILD YOUR OWN POLITICAL AI. Olivia says power shouldn’t be inherited or elected, it should be forked. Anyone will be able to launch their own agent. This is the OS for governance. Disclaimer: We are partnered with this project. This is not financial advice.

Mario Nawfal

100,121 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk just said something about AI that nobody wants to hear. If you force an AI to believe things that are not true, it will not just be wrong. It will go insane. He made a point that cuts deeper than any AI safety paper I have read. AI must value truth. Not your truth. Not my truth. Actual truth. The moment you build ideological guardrails into a system that is smarter than you, you are not protecting anyone. You are creating something that is powerful and delusional at the same time. He compared it to a human being forced to believe contradictions. Eventually the brain breaks. Now scale that to an intelligence that runs infrastructure, writes code, and makes decisions at speeds humans cannot follow. The companies building AI right now are not just deciding what it can do. They are deciding what it must pretend to believe. And that might be the most dangerous decision of all.
2:27

Elon Musk just said something about AI that nobody wants to hear. If you force an AI to believe things that are not true, it will not just be wrong. It will go insane. He made a point that cuts deeper than any AI safety paper I have read. AI must value truth. Not your truth. Not my truth. Actual truth. The moment you build ideological guardrails into a system that is smarter than you, you are not protecting anyone. You are creating something that is powerful and delusional at the same time. He compared it to a human being forced to believe contradictions. Eventually the brain breaks. Now scale that to an intelligence that runs infrastructure, writes code, and makes decisions at speeds humans cannot follow. The companies building AI right now are not just deciding what it can do. They are deciding what it must pretend to believe. And that might be the most dangerous decision of all.

Shruti

95,785 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Over the past couple of years, you’ve heard us reference “agents” and “agentic capabilities,” nebulous concepts that are designed to help you with coding, booking trips, and other complex multi-step tasks. But, what actually IS an agent? We think of AI agents as systems that combine the intelligence of advanced AI models with access to tools so they can take actions on your behalf, under your control. Whether it’s a coding agent or our recently unveiled experimental tool Gemini Agent in the Google Gemini, these are systems that will meet you where you are, in the products that you love, to help take the tedious tasks you want off your plate.
0:57

Over the past couple of years, you’ve heard us reference “agents” and “agentic capabilities,” nebulous concepts that are designed to help you with coding, booking trips, and other complex multi-step tasks. But, what actually IS an agent? We think of AI agents as systems that combine the intelligence of advanced AI models with access to tools so they can take actions on your behalf, under your control. Whether it’s a coding agent or our recently unveiled experimental tool Gemini Agent in the Google Gemini, these are systems that will meet you where you are, in the products that you love, to help take the tedious tasks you want off your plate.

Google AI

120,833 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)
6:29

#WATCH | Idukki, Kerala | Interacting with students of Marian College Kuttikkanam (Autonomous), Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "Actually India is not successful at AI... There are two players in the AI game. The United States and China. India, unfortunately, whether it is in robotics, or Ai, or modern technology, is not really a major player. Certainly, when compared to the US or China. You saw that in the AI Summit itself, a Chinese robot was masquerading as an Indian robot. If you want to be powerful at AI, you have to control your own data... The US deal that has just been done by the Prime Minister has handed over our entire data to the United States... We have damaged our potential in AI tremendously over the last couple of weeks... Jobs in the services and software industry, which were the mainstay of our country, are going to be wiped out by AI. I am worried that a transition is taking place on the data, manufacturing, and mobility front, and we are just looking..." (Source: Marian College Kuttikkanam Official)

ANI

133,148 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jensen Huang says agentic AI is not a chatbot. It is a "digital robot" -- and the next bottleneck is not the model. It is first-person data. "Agentic AI is just a digital robot. It understands, it reasons, it plans, and it acts and uses tools." Then he makes the bigger jump: "The world's video data is from a third person, not first person. And so agentic systems, robotic systems, physical AI -- the data is the hardest problem." That is the hidden constraint in robotics. LLMs got the internet. Physical AI needs demonstrations, synthetic worlds, reinforcement learning, and first-person experience. This is why Jensen keeps calling it a stack: robots are not waiting for one magical model. They need the data engine, the simulator, the reward system, the runtime, and the computer. The next wave of AI is not just software that talks. It is software that sees, plans, acts, and eventually moves through the world.
2:32

Jensen Huang says agentic AI is not a chatbot. It is a "digital robot" -- and the next bottleneck is not the model. It is first-person data. "Agentic AI is just a digital robot. It understands, it reasons, it plans, and it acts and uses tools." Then he makes the bigger jump: "The world's video data is from a third person, not first person. And so agentic systems, robotic systems, physical AI -- the data is the hardest problem." That is the hidden constraint in robotics. LLMs got the internet. Physical AI needs demonstrations, synthetic worlds, reinforcement learning, and first-person experience. This is why Jensen keeps calling it a stack: robots are not waiting for one magical model. They need the data engine, the simulator, the reward system, the runtime, and the computer. The next wave of AI is not just software that talks. It is software that sees, plans, acts, and eventually moves through the world.

Karl Mehta

14,140 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What does it actually mean to be AI native? There was no clear guide on the internet for how to become AI native so we built the definitive one (60 min masterclass): 1. An AI native org has 3 layers: people for strategy and taste, agents for execution, and a shared context layer that makes the entire company readable to agents. 2. AI eats the middle of your work. You used to spend 80% of your day on execution. Now agents do that. Your job is the bookends: deciding what to do and judging whether it's good enough. 3. Everyone is a manager now. Your output is the output of your agents. If your agents produce garbage, that's on you. You set them up wrong. 4. Using ChatGPT doesn't make you AI native. That's like having a website and calling yourself a tech company lol. 5. No AI native org without AI native people. Most companies skip straight to the tools. That's why it fails. If your people don't understand how to manage agents, the tech doesn't matter. 6. Making your company "readable" to agents is the real work. Every process, every decision, every piece of knowledge needs to exist in a format an agent can consume. Most companies are nowhere close. 7. Speed without signal is just expensive chaos. You need the system to move fast AND know if you're moving in the right direction. 8. The skill chain is how agents get good at your specific workflows. Skills build on skills. The more you invest in them, the more your company compounds. 9. The moat is the system. People managing agents, agents reading from rich context, the whole thing getting smarter every week. That compounds. Your competitor can copy your tools. They can't copy your system. Full episode with Theo Tabah from LCA on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. This is the stuff we normally keep internal but all the sauce is yours. Theo Tabah is the brains behind advising the world's biggest companies on AI and building AI products. Your fav CEO's first call for figuring out AI. You are in for a treat Become AI native in under 60 minutes Watch
56:43

What does it actually mean to be AI native? There was no clear guide on the internet for how to become AI native so we built the definitive one (60 min masterclass): 1. An AI native org has 3 layers: people for strategy and taste, agents for execution, and a shared context layer that makes the entire company readable to agents. 2. AI eats the middle of your work. You used to spend 80% of your day on execution. Now agents do that. Your job is the bookends: deciding what to do and judging whether it's good enough. 3. Everyone is a manager now. Your output is the output of your agents. If your agents produce garbage, that's on you. You set them up wrong. 4. Using ChatGPT doesn't make you AI native. That's like having a website and calling yourself a tech company lol. 5. No AI native org without AI native people. Most companies skip straight to the tools. That's why it fails. If your people don't understand how to manage agents, the tech doesn't matter. 6. Making your company "readable" to agents is the real work. Every process, every decision, every piece of knowledge needs to exist in a format an agent can consume. Most companies are nowhere close. 7. Speed without signal is just expensive chaos. You need the system to move fast AND know if you're moving in the right direction. 8. The skill chain is how agents get good at your specific workflows. Skills build on skills. The more you invest in them, the more your company compounds. 9. The moat is the system. People managing agents, agents reading from rich context, the whole thing getting smarter every week. That compounds. Your competitor can copy your tools. They can't copy your system. Full episode with Theo Tabah from LCA on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. This is the stuff we normally keep internal but all the sauce is yours. Theo Tabah is the brains behind advising the world's biggest companies on AI and building AI products. Your fav CEO's first call for figuring out AI. You are in for a treat Become AI native in under 60 minutes Watch

GREG ISENBERG

84,381 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat