Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Seedance 2.0 Emotional Coordinates Meet Valence-Arousal. I’ve been experimenting with valence-arousal prompting in Seedance 2.0 on mitte.ai, and surprisingly, a lot of it actually works. Most likely this should transfer to many other video/image models too. Before we start, I should mention that a lot of attempts can hit...

aimikoda's profile picture

Kōda

26,560 subscribers

54,174 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ArtsEducationScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.
1:34

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 views • 6 months ago

For “The Final Callback,” I used Seedream 5.0 Pro via Lumina to shape the theatre and characters, SeedAudio for the dialogue and emotional soundscape, and Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to bring the full 30-second cinematic drama to life. The biggest surprise during my test wasn't just the cinematic quality—it was how much less trial-and-error the workflow required. For emotional scenes like these, I would normally regenerate multiple versions before getting a usable performance. With Seedance 2.5, I was able to achieve production-ready results in around 1-2 attempts, which significantly reduced generation costs while saving a lot of production time. That efficiency let me spend more time refining the story instead of constantly rerolling shots. The realism is what really completes the experience: Maya's restrained performance, natural dialogue delivery, subtle pauses, realistic character movement, and smooth cinematic camera motion make the scene feel much closer to a real film than an AI-generated clip. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and now you can try it directly on Lumina.
0:25

For “The Final Callback,” I used Seedream 5.0 Pro via Lumina to shape the theatre and characters, SeedAudio for the dialogue and emotional soundscape, and Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to bring the full 30-second cinematic drama to life. The biggest surprise during my test wasn't just the cinematic quality—it was how much less trial-and-error the workflow required. For emotional scenes like these, I would normally regenerate multiple versions before getting a usable performance. With Seedance 2.5, I was able to achieve production-ready results in around 1-2 attempts, which significantly reduced generation costs while saving a lot of production time. That efficiency let me spend more time refining the story instead of constantly rerolling shots. The realism is what really completes the experience: Maya's restrained performance, natural dialogue delivery, subtle pauses, realistic character movement, and smooth cinematic camera motion make the scene feel much closer to a real film than an AI-generated clip. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and now you can try it directly on Lumina.

Marry claire

25,293 views • 24 days ago

Seedance 2.5: Some Tips / Thoughts & Prompt Share I knew from the start that the story in this video was a little too ambitious for 30 seconds. Normally, it could easily have been a 2+ minute sequence but I wanted to squeeze it into 30 seconds because there were a few specific things I wanted to test. I used six different character references for this video and wrote the final prompt in Chinese. The council members were actually supposed to speak in an alien language but I think because I asked for English subtitles and wrote the dialogue itself in English, Seedance decided to make them speak English too. Seedance 2.5 follows prompts extremely well. Actually, "extremely strictly" might be a better way to describe it. You need to be very careful with timing. If you ask for too many actions within a very short time window, you may get what feels like a sped-up version of the scene. On the other hand, if you assign too much time to an action that should happen quickly, the result can feel unnaturally slow or almost like slow motion. At least, these are both things I've run into during my tests. The same applies when you use a shot list without timestamps. Depending on how much you ask the model to fit into each shot, the pacing can still end up too fast or too slow. Finding the right balance between the amount of action and the time available is very important. Another thing I noticed is that Seedance 2.5 can be very literal about motion and state transitions. For example, if a character is facing the camera and you want to see their back in the next moment, simply describing the next shot from behind may not be enough. If you don't explicitly say that the character turns around, the model can sometimes morph or transition directly into the rear view without performing the actual turn. Seedance 2.0 would usually handle these things on its own. So it helps to think not only about what you want to see but also how the scene gets there. Once you identify these kinds of issues and explicitly correct them in the prompt, you can usually get a much cleaner result. For scenes with multiple characters, dialogue and a lot of specific details, the 5,000-character prompt limit can also become restrictive in English. Sometimes there simply isn't enough room to describe everything properly. That's where Chinese prompts become useful. My original English prompt clearly needed much more detail, so I rewrote it in Chinese and used the extra space to describe the scene more precisely. You can see the result in the video. Prompt in the replies.
0:30

Seedance 2.5: Some Tips / Thoughts & Prompt Share I knew from the start that the story in this video was a little too ambitious for 30 seconds. Normally, it could easily have been a 2+ minute sequence but I wanted to squeeze it into 30 seconds because there were a few specific things I wanted to test. I used six different character references for this video and wrote the final prompt in Chinese. The council members were actually supposed to speak in an alien language but I think because I asked for English subtitles and wrote the dialogue itself in English, Seedance decided to make them speak English too. Seedance 2.5 follows prompts extremely well. Actually, "extremely strictly" might be a better way to describe it. You need to be very careful with timing. If you ask for too many actions within a very short time window, you may get what feels like a sped-up version of the scene. On the other hand, if you assign too much time to an action that should happen quickly, the result can feel unnaturally slow or almost like slow motion. At least, these are both things I've run into during my tests. The same applies when you use a shot list without timestamps. Depending on how much you ask the model to fit into each shot, the pacing can still end up too fast or too slow. Finding the right balance between the amount of action and the time available is very important. Another thing I noticed is that Seedance 2.5 can be very literal about motion and state transitions. For example, if a character is facing the camera and you want to see their back in the next moment, simply describing the next shot from behind may not be enough. If you don't explicitly say that the character turns around, the model can sometimes morph or transition directly into the rear view without performing the actual turn. Seedance 2.0 would usually handle these things on its own. So it helps to think not only about what you want to see but also how the scene gets there. Once you identify these kinds of issues and explicitly correct them in the prompt, you can usually get a much cleaner result. For scenes with multiple characters, dialogue and a lot of specific details, the 5,000-character prompt limit can also become restrictive in English. Sometimes there simply isn't enough room to describe everything properly. That's where Chinese prompts become useful. My original English prompt clearly needed much more detail, so I rewrote it in Chinese and used the extra space to describe the scene more precisely. You can see the result in the video. Prompt in the replies.

Kōda

14,687 views • 17 days ago

Okay! WAN 3.0 let's go! Whenever I test a new video model, the first thing I always do is test how well it handles language nuance. And yup, WAN 3.0 did it pretty well. I tested it via Venice And nope, this is not sponsored content. I use my own money. I’ve always used Venice for some of my more erotic video work because it’s uncensored and awesome. As simple as that. 👍😎 The reason i quote this post because people keep asking like heeey where do you generate uncensored stuff. Only two places right now, either Venice or D-zine. So there you go! bUTTTT!!!! If there's more, let me know 👍 I guess I could say that WAN 3.0 is probably the closest model to Seedance 2.0 in terms of quality right now. For my very specific needs, I love making dialogue-driven scenes, and WAN 3.0 is absolutely fine for that. In fact, I have to say it’s much better than MiniMax H3 in some ways. But of course, keep in mind that every model has its own strengths and flaws. Unfortunately, when it comes to very precise, extremely dynamic scenes, like what I usually do with my Sari & Ploy series, especially fight scenes, it’s not quite there yet. The only other problem is that sometimes, if you’re unlucky, WAN 3.0 can produce this weird audio artifact. I don’t really know how to explain it. It’s kind of like that flanger-like sound you sometimes get when generating with Seedance. Yeah, WAN 3.0 can occasionally have the same problem, LOL 😆 But performance-wise, for my use case, especially conversational scenes, candid moments, and the kind of raw camera movement I’ve always loved, WAN 3.0 really delivers. For me personally, this is where things start to get really exciting, especially when I think about series production. I can now be much more strategic about which model I use for each type of scene. For example, I’ll still use Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 mainly for more extreme, dynamic fight scenes, while conversational scenes are something I can comfortably do with WAN 3.0. MiniMax H3, meanwhile, feels more like the experimental option. I personally think H3 is a very unique model. Maybe it’s not as powerful for conversational scenes, but it definitely has its own flavor and can produce things that feel different from the others. But you know what, I can’t help it. I really need to say this LOL. It’s funny how a model like Grok Imagine Video used to be sooo good, and I praised it a lot, but now it feels like an extreme slot machine. At this point, I sometimes feel like it’s mostly being hyped by people who just want to glaze Elon Musk. Somehow, it actually went backwards. 😅 And it’s interesting how models like Seedance 1.5 and the previous WAN versions have improved so much over time. It feels very ironic because I wasn’t even a fan of Seedance back then, and the same goes for WAN. But yeah, at the end of the day is the output quality that matters for me.
1:05

Sensitive content

Okay! WAN 3.0 let's go! Whenever I test a new video model, the first thing I always do is test how well it handles language nuance. And yup, WAN 3.0 did it pretty well. I tested it via Venice And nope, this is not sponsored content. I use my own money. I’ve always used Venice for some of my more erotic video work because it’s uncensored and awesome. As simple as that. 👍😎 The reason i quote this post because people keep asking like heeey where do you generate uncensored stuff. Only two places right now, either Venice or D-zine. So there you go! bUTTTT!!!! If there's more, let me know 👍 I guess I could say that WAN 3.0 is probably the closest model to Seedance 2.0 in terms of quality right now. For my very specific needs, I love making dialogue-driven scenes, and WAN 3.0 is absolutely fine for that. In fact, I have to say it’s much better than MiniMax H3 in some ways. But of course, keep in mind that every model has its own strengths and flaws. Unfortunately, when it comes to very precise, extremely dynamic scenes, like what I usually do with my Sari & Ploy series, especially fight scenes, it’s not quite there yet. The only other problem is that sometimes, if you’re unlucky, WAN 3.0 can produce this weird audio artifact. I don’t really know how to explain it. It’s kind of like that flanger-like sound you sometimes get when generating with Seedance. Yeah, WAN 3.0 can occasionally have the same problem, LOL 😆 But performance-wise, for my use case, especially conversational scenes, candid moments, and the kind of raw camera movement I’ve always loved, WAN 3.0 really delivers. For me personally, this is where things start to get really exciting, especially when I think about series production. I can now be much more strategic about which model I use for each type of scene. For example, I’ll still use Seedance 2.0 and 2.5 mainly for more extreme, dynamic fight scenes, while conversational scenes are something I can comfortably do with WAN 3.0. MiniMax H3, meanwhile, feels more like the experimental option. I personally think H3 is a very unique model. Maybe it’s not as powerful for conversational scenes, but it definitely has its own flavor and can produce things that feel different from the others. But you know what, I can’t help it. I really need to say this LOL. It’s funny how a model like Grok Imagine Video used to be sooo good, and I praised it a lot, but now it feels like an extreme slot machine. At this point, I sometimes feel like it’s mostly being hyped by people who just want to glaze Elon Musk. Somehow, it actually went backwards. 😅 And it’s interesting how models like Seedance 1.5 and the previous WAN versions have improved so much over time. It feels very ironic because I wasn’t even a fan of Seedance back then, and the same goes for WAN. But yeah, at the end of the day is the output quality that matters for me.

MXVDXN // DAN

185,028 views • 5 days ago

i probably shouldn't be giving this away but f*ck it i built an agent that turns your ad script into model-specific prompts for AI video generation, based on skills for each model i use day-to-day here's how it works: > pick your mode - first frame or full video generation > pick your model - gpt-image-2, omni, kling, seedance 2.0 or 2.5 > paste your script - it splits it into scenes > get a prompt per scene, tuned for the exact model you picked most people think the model is what makes the ad... and it's true, but the prompt is what gets you a good generation on the first try instead of wasting money on rerolls - seedance wants timestamps. - omni wants references tagged. - gpt-image wants art direction and reference feed them all the same generic prompt and they all hand you slop these skills took me months of daily reps to get right, now i'm sharing it with you RT + reply "SCENES" and i'll send you the full thing so you can run in on your PC (must follow so i can dm)
0:31

i probably shouldn't be giving this away but f*ck it i built an agent that turns your ad script into model-specific prompts for AI video generation, based on skills for each model i use day-to-day here's how it works: > pick your mode - first frame or full video generation > pick your model - gpt-image-2, omni, kling, seedance 2.0 or 2.5 > paste your script - it splits it into scenes > get a prompt per scene, tuned for the exact model you picked most people think the model is what makes the ad... and it's true, but the prompt is what gets you a good generation on the first try instead of wasting money on rerolls - seedance wants timestamps. - omni wants references tagged. - gpt-image wants art direction and reference feed them all the same generic prompt and they all hand you slop these skills took me months of daily reps to get right, now i'm sharing it with you RT + reply "SCENES" and i'll send you the full thing so you can run in on your PC (must follow so i can dm)

MAX

17,004 views • 18 days ago

Can we call this AI directing? 😂 Seedance 2.0 with the Omni Reference feature honestly feels like a total game changer. Summer Trip is one of my film which I made used Omni Reference, not only start frame anymore and for the first time, it genuinely feels like I’m directing the AI instead of just prompting it. The reasoning in Seedance 2.0 is seriously impressive. It understands intent in a way that feels collaborative. Of course, in production it still needs proper touch-ups in post, grading, timing, polishing details, but the foundation it gives is strong. Like it or not, we’re already here. And to be honest, my workflow has to evolve too. I can’t approach this the same way I did before. It’s less about generating random shots and more about guiding, refining, and thinking like a director from the start. Personally, I see this as a shift, not replacing filmmaking, but reshaping the role of the filmmaker. Now the question isn’t “Can AI make it?” but “How well can you direct it?”
2:19

Can we call this AI directing? 😂 Seedance 2.0 with the Omni Reference feature honestly feels like a total game changer. Summer Trip is one of my film which I made used Omni Reference, not only start frame anymore and for the first time, it genuinely feels like I’m directing the AI instead of just prompting it. The reasoning in Seedance 2.0 is seriously impressive. It understands intent in a way that feels collaborative. Of course, in production it still needs proper touch-ups in post, grading, timing, polishing details, but the foundation it gives is strong. Like it or not, we’re already here. And to be honest, my workflow has to evolve too. I can’t approach this the same way I did before. It’s less about generating random shots and more about guiding, refining, and thinking like a director from the start. Personally, I see this as a shift, not replacing filmmaking, but reshaping the role of the filmmaker. Now the question isn’t “Can AI make it?” but “How well can you direct it?”

Dinda Prasetyo

29,385 views • 5 months ago

📖SEEDANCE 2.0 FEELS LIKE CHEATING — IF YOU USE IT RIGHT Most people don’t. It’s a controllable pipeline — and JSON prompts are the real upgrade most creators ignore. Most people still write simple prompts and hope for the best. That works… but only for random outputs. JSON changes the game: Instead of: “cyberpunk city, cinematic, camera moving forward” You define: •scene structure •camera movement •character consistency •timing per shot •motion rules This is where Seedance 2.0 becomes powerful — not just generation, but control. Creators who switch to JSON-style prompting stop “retrying” and start directing scenes like a system. That’s the difference between AI content… and AI filmmaking 📥 Tomorrow I’m revealing a method that changes everything about how AI content is made 🔖In the pinned article below you can see how this is used
0:28

📖SEEDANCE 2.0 FEELS LIKE CHEATING — IF YOU USE IT RIGHT Most people don’t. It’s a controllable pipeline — and JSON prompts are the real upgrade most creators ignore. Most people still write simple prompts and hope for the best. That works… but only for random outputs. JSON changes the game: Instead of: “cyberpunk city, cinematic, camera moving forward” You define: •scene structure •camera movement •character consistency •timing per shot •motion rules This is where Seedance 2.0 becomes powerful — not just generation, but control. Creators who switch to JSON-style prompting stop “retrying” and start directing scenes like a system. That’s the difference between AI content… and AI filmmaking 📥 Tomorrow I’m revealing a method that changes everything about how AI content is made 🔖In the pinned article below you can see how this is used

Zentrix⌚️

17,117 views • 2 months ago

Tried Runway’s new Aleph 2.0 on footage and this honestly feels like a completely different way to edit videos. Instead of reshooting or manually editing every frame, I just described the change I wanted. I tested product color swaps and style variations from the same clip while keeping the original lighting, framing, and composition untouched. What impressed me most is how consistent it stays across multiple shots. It genuinely feels like editing video with text. This could completely change how brands and creators make ad variants and social content. Also cool that Runway now has Aleph 2.0, Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 Pro, Seedance 2.0, GPT Image 2 + more all in one place. Aleph 2.0 is live on Runway now: Get 22% off 2 months of Runway Pro with code ALEPH2 - valid through May 31, 2026. #ad #MadeWithRunway Runway
1:26

Tried Runway’s new Aleph 2.0 on footage and this honestly feels like a completely different way to edit videos. Instead of reshooting or manually editing every frame, I just described the change I wanted. I tested product color swaps and style variations from the same clip while keeping the original lighting, framing, and composition untouched. What impressed me most is how consistent it stays across multiple shots. It genuinely feels like editing video with text. This could completely change how brands and creators make ad variants and social content. Also cool that Runway now has Aleph 2.0, Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 Pro, Seedance 2.0, GPT Image 2 + more all in one place. Aleph 2.0 is live on Runway now: Get 22% off 2 months of Runway Pro with code ALEPH2 - valid through May 31, 2026. #ad #MadeWithRunway Runway

Manoj Kumar Shah

67,487 views • 3 months ago

I have been wanting to test performance transfer in Seadance 2.5 since launch, now I have, I am really impressed by the results. I wrote a short script and recorded myself giving a rallying speech as an orc warlord, then fed this and an image of the orc into Seedance with this prompt "A cinematic close up of an orc warlord giving a rallying speech to his army of orcs. Transfer the performance, movement and audio from Video 1 onto the the character Image 1. Do not add any music" I didn't prompt the dialogue or performance in text. The first video you see is a a final cut of the video, the second is the final cut of the video with my video performance. As you can see it's not an exact like-for-like transfer of the performance and voice but more a interpretation by Seedance. It's made my amateur performance better IMHO, more fitting with the creator but retain the essence, nuance and context. So you don't have to feed in a long prompt to get good performance out of your AI actors you can just show them what you want with a video! I used Seedance Enterprise on bytedances lumina platform Lumina link in the comments!
0:33

I have been wanting to test performance transfer in Seadance 2.5 since launch, now I have, I am really impressed by the results. I wrote a short script and recorded myself giving a rallying speech as an orc warlord, then fed this and an image of the orc into Seedance with this prompt "A cinematic close up of an orc warlord giving a rallying speech to his army of orcs. Transfer the performance, movement and audio from Video 1 onto the the character Image 1. Do not add any music" I didn't prompt the dialogue or performance in text. The first video you see is a a final cut of the video, the second is the final cut of the video with my video performance. As you can see it's not an exact like-for-like transfer of the performance and voice but more a interpretation by Seedance. It's made my amateur performance better IMHO, more fitting with the creator but retain the essence, nuance and context. So you don't have to feed in a long prompt to get good performance out of your AI actors you can just show them what you want with a video! I used Seedance Enterprise on bytedances lumina platform Lumina link in the comments!

Uncanny Harry AI

22,906 views • 17 days ago

I’m really proud of a lot of the shots I have been able to achieve lately with the adherence to prompts getting so good it’s a level of creative control I e been dying for and really starting to make me actual dreams come true for just myself working with these tools! Prompting is such a unique and creative aspect of what we all do in AI. Knowing when to prompt long form and when not to, what keyword tokens and how they are applied in sequence, structure and formatting, they all matter. Especially with the models not needing extensive prompts, that’s actually where you can shine with how you use it because sometimes simpler is better but in other instances extensive motion/movement detail can be the difference maker for a cool shot or a spectacular one. I’ve been focusing a lot on shot development prompts and structure testing and I’ve managed to find a sweet spot. I’m Gonna put together a little rundown on how I did some of mine next week for this film. 🙌😎🔥💯🎥
0:43

I’m really proud of a lot of the shots I have been able to achieve lately with the adherence to prompts getting so good it’s a level of creative control I e been dying for and really starting to make me actual dreams come true for just myself working with these tools! Prompting is such a unique and creative aspect of what we all do in AI. Knowing when to prompt long form and when not to, what keyword tokens and how they are applied in sequence, structure and formatting, they all matter. Especially with the models not needing extensive prompts, that’s actually where you can shine with how you use it because sometimes simpler is better but in other instances extensive motion/movement detail can be the difference maker for a cool shot or a spectacular one. I’ve been focusing a lot on shot development prompts and structure testing and I’ve managed to find a sweet spot. I’m Gonna put together a little rundown on how I did some of mine next week for this film. 🙌😎🔥💯🎥

Dustin Hollywood

15,964 views • 1 year ago

🇳🇱🗽 This is ByteDance's Seedance 2.0 with my New Amsterdam (current day New York City) Simulator prompt Unlike previous models like Seedance 1.5 (which would add windmills that didn't look Dutch), it really accurately portrays the city as it was in 1670 It's very impressive and because it takes reference image/video/audio, you can put yourself in it like I did here Only thing bad I see is some distortion in is some of the text which other video models seem to do better now, but yes it's very impressive This is purposely made to look a bit like a game, so it can do more photorealism than this actually
0:35

🇳🇱🗽 This is ByteDance's Seedance 2.0 with my New Amsterdam (current day New York City) Simulator prompt Unlike previous models like Seedance 1.5 (which would add windmills that didn't look Dutch), it really accurately portrays the city as it was in 1670 It's very impressive and because it takes reference image/video/audio, you can put yourself in it like I did here Only thing bad I see is some distortion in is some of the text which other video models seem to do better now, but yes it's very impressive This is purposely made to look a bit like a game, so it can do more photorealism than this actually

@levelsio

835,180 views • 6 months ago

Seedance 2.0 vs. Seedance 2.0 Mini Actually, I tested this directly in Dreamina. It's already available on my account, but it seems Dreamina hasn't announced it on their social media yet 😆 Anyway, here are my first impressions. Basically, it's not bad... not bad at all. However, when I tested it with something more action-oriented, the difference was huge. It depends on your goal, but I don't think I'll use Seedance 2.0 Mini for action-heavy prompts. I could be wrong though, and I need to do more testing. For something that looks simpler and more natural, Seedance 2.0 Mini is surprisingly good. You can still notice some glitches or artifacts from time to time, but overall it's pretty decent. It's definitely not worse than the current version of Grok Imagine Video 😂😂In fact, this is what Grok Imagine should be. They're almost there but Instead, they're going backwards. I think only Tetsuo and Freeze keep saying Grok Imagine is the best model in the world LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 Still, I think Seedance 2.0 Mini delivers exactly what it promises. It's cheaper, faster, although it comes with a slight sacrifice in quality (well obviously it's a mini version of it), although not as much as I expected based on my initial tests. I think in the end, you need to identify your needs and decide when to use Mini, when to use Fast, and when to use the full version. At this stage, I can't say much yet, but I'll keep exploring it further. Meanwhile, check out the video comparison I made here.
2:04

Seedance 2.0 vs. Seedance 2.0 Mini Actually, I tested this directly in Dreamina. It's already available on my account, but it seems Dreamina hasn't announced it on their social media yet 😆 Anyway, here are my first impressions. Basically, it's not bad... not bad at all. However, when I tested it with something more action-oriented, the difference was huge. It depends on your goal, but I don't think I'll use Seedance 2.0 Mini for action-heavy prompts. I could be wrong though, and I need to do more testing. For something that looks simpler and more natural, Seedance 2.0 Mini is surprisingly good. You can still notice some glitches or artifacts from time to time, but overall it's pretty decent. It's definitely not worse than the current version of Grok Imagine Video 😂😂In fact, this is what Grok Imagine should be. They're almost there but Instead, they're going backwards. I think only Tetsuo and Freeze keep saying Grok Imagine is the best model in the world LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 Still, I think Seedance 2.0 Mini delivers exactly what it promises. It's cheaper, faster, although it comes with a slight sacrifice in quality (well obviously it's a mini version of it), although not as much as I expected based on my initial tests. I think in the end, you need to identify your needs and decide when to use Mini, when to use Fast, and when to use the full version. At this stage, I can't say much yet, but I'll keep exploring it further. Meanwhile, check out the video comparison I made here.

MXVDXN // DAN

31,230 views • 2 months ago

Oh that’s why he mentioned it during the live from March 3rd😕 🦊 From after No Labels Part 1 ended, through awards season up until now… it honestly has been pretty hard. I’ve kind of been struggling the whole time 🦊 How should I say this… I had burnout come and go a few times and these days I’ve had a lot of worries and a lot on my mind but my thoughts wouldn’t organize themselves, that’s why I’ve been talking with a lot of people and listening to them and while doing that, I’ve been sorting out my thoughts little by little. I’ve also been facing parts of myself that I used to avoid or couldn’t look at 🦊 While doing that, I feel like these days I’m recovering little by little in a healthier and cooler way and since I know that this kind of pain can also be meaningful, in a way it feels like a positive kind of pain so I think it’s okay 🦊 If I get the chance, I’d like to talk about it in more detail someday 🦊 Anyway, those are the thoughts I’ve had
2:11

Oh that’s why he mentioned it during the live from March 3rd😕 🦊 From after No Labels Part 1 ended, through awards season up until now… it honestly has been pretty hard. I’ve kind of been struggling the whole time 🦊 How should I say this… I had burnout come and go a few times and these days I’ve had a lot of worries and a lot on my mind but my thoughts wouldn’t organize themselves, that’s why I’ve been talking with a lot of people and listening to them and while doing that, I’ve been sorting out my thoughts little by little. I’ve also been facing parts of myself that I used to avoid or couldn’t look at 🦊 While doing that, I feel like these days I’m recovering little by little in a healthier and cooler way and since I know that this kind of pain can also be meaningful, in a way it feels like a positive kind of pain so I think it’s okay 🦊 If I get the chance, I’d like to talk about it in more detail someday 🦊 Anyway, those are the thoughts I’ve had

Sara

67,051 views • 5 months ago

I used Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to create this AI rap music video. One thing I noticed during testing was that I spent less time regenerating shots. I got the result on the second attempt. I was getting usable results more consistently, which made the workflow feel faster and more cost-effective. The authenticity struck me profoundly, Seedance 2.5 captures micro‑expressions and subtle eye shifts that feel unscripted — the kind of nuance that usually gets lost in AI, but here makes every frame read as a real performance. The 30-second generation made the creative process feel much more natural. The motion, lighting, and camera movement felt more natural, making it easier to focus on storytelling instead of fixing every scene. I can also see how pairing it with SeedAudio would make the overall AI music video workflow even more seamless. Support for multimodal references and localized editing helped keep the visuals consistent while making refinements much easier. Overall, Seedance 2.5 feels less like a shot generator and more like a creative tool for cinematic storytelling and music videos. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and Lumina will also roll out Seedance 2.5 soon
0:30

I used Seedance Enterprise 2.5 to create this AI rap music video. One thing I noticed during testing was that I spent less time regenerating shots. I got the result on the second attempt. I was getting usable results more consistently, which made the workflow feel faster and more cost-effective. The authenticity struck me profoundly, Seedance 2.5 captures micro‑expressions and subtle eye shifts that feel unscripted — the kind of nuance that usually gets lost in AI, but here makes every frame read as a real performance. The 30-second generation made the creative process feel much more natural. The motion, lighting, and camera movement felt more natural, making it easier to focus on storytelling instead of fixing every scene. I can also see how pairing it with SeedAudio would make the overall AI music video workflow even more seamless. Support for multimodal references and localized editing helped keep the visuals consistent while making refinements much easier. Overall, Seedance 2.5 feels less like a shot generator and more like a creative tool for cinematic storytelling and music videos. Seedance 2.5 API is about to launch on BytePlus, and Lumina will also roll out Seedance 2.5 soon

Zara

28,952 views • 25 days ago

jay’s blood saga in seoul d2 ending ment 🐈‍⬛ doesn’t it feel a bit different? or is it just me? up until now, all the tours we’ve done as enhypen have been rlly precious and meaningful to me, and i think every single one was a great performance that could only exist in that moment. but this time, it feels different right from the start. is it just me? it feels like we’re experiencing something new, and i can definitely sense that engenes are enjoying it differently too. there’s something noticeably different about how we’re all approaching this concert. i think that’s something to be really happy about and bc this is a concert we prepared for day and night, we honestly had a lot of worries ofc but more than that, we had a lot of confidence, and we put so much thought into how we wanted to show it to you. and now that we’re going through these two days, i just feel so relieved. it feels like everything we’ve worked on up until now has been rewarded, and i’m really grateful for that. both yesterday and today have been such great performances that gave me so much energy. we’ll do our best until the very end and come back again. and thank you so much for coming. please always stay with us. thank you vid from 1130day
1:54

jay’s blood saga in seoul d2 ending ment 🐈‍⬛ doesn’t it feel a bit different? or is it just me? up until now, all the tours we’ve done as enhypen have been rlly precious and meaningful to me, and i think every single one was a great performance that could only exist in that moment. but this time, it feels different right from the start. is it just me? it feels like we’re experiencing something new, and i can definitely sense that engenes are enjoying it differently too. there’s something noticeably different about how we’re all approaching this concert. i think that’s something to be really happy about and bc this is a concert we prepared for day and night, we honestly had a lot of worries ofc but more than that, we had a lot of confidence, and we put so much thought into how we wanted to show it to you. and now that we’re going through these two days, i just feel so relieved. it feels like everything we’ve worked on up until now has been rewarded, and i’m really grateful for that. both yesterday and today have been such great performances that gave me so much energy. we’ll do our best until the very end and come back again. and thank you so much for coming. please always stay with us. thank you vid from 1130day

LUCKY MAI ✴︎

73,446 views • 3 months ago

Seedance 2.0 is insane. Blender previs is having a moment in AI filmmaking for a reason. I wanted to see how far I could push the workflow beyond a simple camera move in an ambush scene. The workflow: 1. Make a start image in Midjourney 2. Block it out in Blender, animate the camera 3. Feed both to Seedance The more I test this pipeline, the more convinced I am that hybrid pipelines are the future. The conversation is moving fast but previs is one of the clearest unlocks so far. Seedance still isn't perfect at matching the reference but it's close. You can experiment with staging, timing, and camera movement before you ever touch the video model. Solve the scene before you generate the shot.
0:44

Seedance 2.0 is insane. Blender previs is having a moment in AI filmmaking for a reason. I wanted to see how far I could push the workflow beyond a simple camera move in an ambush scene. The workflow: 1. Make a start image in Midjourney 2. Block it out in Blender, animate the camera 3. Feed both to Seedance The more I test this pipeline, the more convinced I am that hybrid pipelines are the future. The conversation is moving fast but previs is one of the clearest unlocks so far. Seedance still isn't perfect at matching the reference but it's close. You can experiment with staging, timing, and camera movement before you ever touch the video model. Solve the scene before you generate the shot.

Reid Hannaford

225,147 views • 2 months ago

Enjoyed this drill this morning 🏌️‍♂️ Tee it very high - try to hit it low The goal with this for me is to promote a slightly more upward angle of attack, while reducing loft at impact. This reduces Spin Loft, which plays an important role in smash factor, and distance. Spin Loft in simple terms is dynamic loft minus angle of attack. I tend to hit slightly down on my driver, and sometimes leave the face slightly open. This can mean a flight that is a bit high and weak, losing a lot of potential distance. Flight and smash factor on this one was really good, and verified that the drill can move my delivery in the right direction.
0:23

Enjoyed this drill this morning 🏌️‍♂️ Tee it very high - try to hit it low The goal with this for me is to promote a slightly more upward angle of attack, while reducing loft at impact. This reduces Spin Loft, which plays an important role in smash factor, and distance. Spin Loft in simple terms is dynamic loft minus angle of attack. I tend to hit slightly down on my driver, and sometimes leave the face slightly open. This can mean a flight that is a bit high and weak, losing a lot of potential distance. Flight and smash factor on this one was really good, and verified that the drill can move my delivery in the right direction.

Fit For Golf - Mike Carroll

31,529 views • 1 month ago

i should never be sharing this but f*ck it Seedance + GPT Images 2 is insane for AI video you can generate ads for almost any product, even really complex ones that Omni or Kling struggle to create without issues i've been using this for videos with complicated movements, multiple actions, and comedy scenes, and it's been perfect for it here's what you can do with it: - create realistic product ads with complex movements or product looks - generate consistent characters across multiple scenes - pull off comedy skits with natural actions and timing - animate almost any product without weird AI artifacts - turn a single image into a high-quality ad in minutes i put together a step-by-step breakdown on how i create them, with all the prompts and everything i'm using - literally my complete workflow RT + reply "SEEDANCE" and i'll send it over (must follow so i can DM)
0:37

i should never be sharing this but f*ck it Seedance + GPT Images 2 is insane for AI video you can generate ads for almost any product, even really complex ones that Omni or Kling struggle to create without issues i've been using this for videos with complicated movements, multiple actions, and comedy scenes, and it's been perfect for it here's what you can do with it: - create realistic product ads with complex movements or product looks - generate consistent characters across multiple scenes - pull off comedy skits with natural actions and timing - animate almost any product without weird AI artifacts - turn a single image into a high-quality ad in minutes i put together a step-by-step breakdown on how i create them, with all the prompts and everything i'm using - literally my complete workflow RT + reply "SEEDANCE" and i'll send it over (must follow so i can DM)

MAX

10,823 views • 1 month ago

Madonna on yoga: "The whole thing about yoga is that you could just sit in a lotus position and you're doing yoga. You could just take a walk on a beach and you're doing yoga. It starts with your state of mind. And you get into a meditative state, and basically the asanas or the poses are just something to do while you're meditating. "It's taught me how to be a lot more flexible — and I don't mean just physically, I mean emotionally. I mean just in terms of how I look at the world, how I look at other people, how I am with other people. And I've learned to be not only easier on myself, but also on other people in terms of my expectations. "And it gives me a certain kind of centredness and serenity that I don't think I had before. I mean, it gives me so much, and the more I talk about it, the more trivial it sounds. It's been a great influence."
0:51

Madonna on yoga: "The whole thing about yoga is that you could just sit in a lotus position and you're doing yoga. You could just take a walk on a beach and you're doing yoga. It starts with your state of mind. And you get into a meditative state, and basically the asanas or the poses are just something to do while you're meditating. "It's taught me how to be a lot more flexible — and I don't mean just physically, I mean emotionally. I mean just in terms of how I look at the world, how I look at other people, how I am with other people. And I've learned to be not only easier on myself, but also on other people in terms of my expectations. "And it gives me a certain kind of centredness and serenity that I don't think I had before. I mean, it gives me so much, and the more I talk about it, the more trivial it sounds. It's been a great influence."

Rakesh Krishnan Simha

84,305 views • 4 months ago

A new experiment with Seedance 2.0 on mitte.ai : FACS. For this videos, I only used FACS codes in the prompt. I didn’t describe the facial expressions in plain language at all. FACS (Facial Action Coding System) is a system for describing facial expressions using individual muscle movements called Action Units (AUs), instead of general emotion labels like “happy” or “sad.” It breaks the face into controllable components such as brow movement, eyelid tension, lip movement and cheek activation. Even though it didn’t follow all 14 Action Units perfectly, it still interpreted most of them surprisingly well. I think this could become especially useful for subtle facial acting, forced smiles, uncanny expressions, mixed emotions and micro-performance details during close-up dialogue shots. You can check the prompt for first 15s, a list of FACS codes generated with GPT Image 2 in the replies.
1:00

A new experiment with Seedance 2.0 on mitte.ai : FACS. For this videos, I only used FACS codes in the prompt. I didn’t describe the facial expressions in plain language at all. FACS (Facial Action Coding System) is a system for describing facial expressions using individual muscle movements called Action Units (AUs), instead of general emotion labels like “happy” or “sad.” It breaks the face into controllable components such as brow movement, eyelid tension, lip movement and cheek activation. Even though it didn’t follow all 14 Action Units perfectly, it still interpreted most of them surprisingly well. I think this could become especially useful for subtle facial acting, forced smiles, uncanny expressions, mixed emotions and micro-performance details during close-up dialogue shots. You can check the prompt for first 15s, a list of FACS codes generated with GPT Image 2 in the replies.

Kōda

458,883 views • 3 months ago