Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Shoots 5 people on Christmas over an argument about a missing turkey leg. When impulse control fails chronically and causes significant harm, it may classify as an impulse control disorder. According to the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), these fall under "Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorders."...

446,421 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

ADHD isn’t an “attention deficit.” It’s a profound developmental disorder of self-regulation. Dr. Russell Barkley (one of the world’s leading ADHD researchers) explains why the name “ADHD” has done massive damage: - It trivializes a condition as serious as autism, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. - It makes people think “just drink coffee and focus” — when the real issue is far deeper. The core problem isn’t just distractibility. It’s three interlocking executive deficits: 1. Persistence toward the future — inability to stay motivated by delayed rewards 2. Resistance to distractions — constant derailment by immediate temptations 3. Working memory — struggling to hold goals, plans, and consequences in mind Together, these create a devastating impairment in self-regulation — the ability to consciously inhibit impulses, direct actions toward yourself (self-talk, self-monitoring), and align behavior with long-term welfare. Barkley: “This is not an attention problem. This is a disorder of self-regulation… as serious as manic depression, and in its own way, as autism.” Parents often hear “he’s just lazy” or “she needs to try harder.” The truth is far more compassionate and urgent: The child’s brain is developmentally behind in the very mechanisms that allow other kids to stop, think, plan, and protect their future selves. If we renamed it Self-Regulatory Developmental Disorder (SRDD), the conversation would change overnight. How many adults do you know who still struggle with exactly these same three deficits — and were never properly understood as kids?

Camus

464,430 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Do you know how to perform the “whack-a-mole” or WAM sign on your neurological examination? Just like the arcade or fair game; reemergence of involuntary movement in different body part after suppression of movement by examiner. Original name Japan: mole buster or mole smash. Key points: - It is specific but not very sensitive for functional movement disorders. - Diagnosis of a functional movement disorder ideally supported by demonstrating positive signs during neurological examination. - Development and evaluation of new positive signs is an important to improving diagnostic certainty. - WAM sign was a highly specific (78%) and moderately sensitive (52%) test for the diagnosis of FMD. Tested across a variety of functional hyperkinetic movements. - Since stress or being under pressure may worsen abnormal movements during suppression of another body part and this makes it tough to be completely sensitive or specific. - Marked difference in the inter-observer agreement values for the WAM sign between FMD and organic movement disorder patients (0.77 vs. 0.28). - Greater than a third of persons tested, intra-person variability of the WAM sign. Translation: the test result depended on which part of the body was suppressed. - History lesson: Whac-A-Mole arcade game created in 1975 by the amusements manufacturer TOGO in Japan. - Original name Mogura Taiji モグラ退治, Mole Buster or Mogura Tataki モグラたたき, Mole Smash. - Criticized for teaching children to be cruel towards animals. - Used in rehabilitation to teaching auditory processing and attention. My take is that you should never diagnose a functional movement disorder based on one examination maneuver or one visit in the clinic or hospital setting.

Michael Okun

23,006 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

DOJ Assistant AG for Civil Rights, Harmeet Dhillon, is suing the city of Denver, Colorado over its "assault weapons" ban law. While I'm glad to see this type of lawsuit as the Denver "law" is prima facie unconstitutional, I'd much rather see those responsible for these types of laws be criminally charged and perp walked in chains as these "laws" aren't just unconstitutional, instituting them is a criminal offense. To that point, Denver's Mayor Johnson stated, "Denver will not be bullied by any administration, especially one that has shown so little regard for public safety or the rule of law." As you can see by that quote, he doesn't care about a civil lawsuit as it will be paid for with forcibly stolen taxpayer dollars and won't impact his life at all. He probably wouldn't be so smug if he was rightfully and justly looking at a prison sentence. TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242: "Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death." #CityLife #denver #CivilRights #crime #democrats #milehighcity #policestate #urban

Mrgunsngear

12,049 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Do you remember the story about the 12 year old girl stabbing her younger brother to death while he was asleep for no apparent reason? She was crying and kept repeatedly saying "I don't know what happened. I don't know why I did that. That was some demonic sh*t", implying she was possessed and lost impulse control. Turns out she was on/off psychiatric medication for ADHD. Really makes you wonder how many horrific evil acts and criminal behavior is a result of these drugs... especially benzos and opioids. Benzos are the most horrifying drug in my opinion with the effects on impulse control and how they make you genuinely "sleepwalk" in a hypnotic state where you don't remember what you're doing. Autopilot essentially. There are tons of stories of ambien doing this as well. It's stories like these that give so much legitimacy to Robert F. Kennedy Jr concerns about SSRIs and psychiatric drugs with school shooters. MSM dismissing this problem and ridiculing RFK for wanting to investigate it just further demonstrates how captured and corrupt they are, especially in regards to their rhetoric about gun control. Banning guns or any weapon will fix nothing because it's not a gun problem, it's a mental health problem. "This country has a mental health problem disguised as a gun problem, and a tyranny problem disguised as a security problem." -- Joe Rogan Her mother did some interviews providing more detail about the situation and how the drugs impacted her behavior: >Lyda said that the 12-year-old "never had behavioral issues until she was put back on medication she was off of for over a year." >While speaking with Cuomo, Lyda went into greater details of the ADHD (Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder) medication her daughter had been on an off of during her childhood. >On Thursday, Lyda said: "I'm hanging in there, one day at a time. From what we found it looks like it was a medication issue, not anything else, a manic episode of some kind. She was fine, she wasn't unstable until she was put back on the medication." >Speaking about what happened for the 12-year-old to come off her medication, Lyda said: "She cut her arms within a month of being back on it, I immediately took her off after speaking to the school and her doctor and herself, we had a long conversation. >"She felt that she was really irritated, irritable, angry for no reason on the medication so of course I took her off of it. Unfortunately it was too late, the damage was done, stuff like this can happen months or even years after being off of a medication like this."

Inversionism

2,114,206 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Fitts: "[With the control grid]... the mega-rich can live a very... luxurious life and control or shrink the rest of the population without fear... [but that] uber class of people... literally think of themselves as a different species." Carlson: "And they may be actually." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a conversation with Tucker Carlson (Tucker Carlson) posted to YouTube on February 27, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Carlson: "Can I just ask the dumbest question? Why would anybody in authority want that level of control? What's the impulse there? Why would you want to do that to people?" Fitts: "With that kind of control I can bring out phenomenally powerful technology without worrying about it being weaponized. So I can bring out breakthrough energy technology and not worry that I can't control how it gets used. I can manage a large population in a world where technology is changing without losing control. "So a small group of people can control the many. And also if I believe that with life science I can live forever or for much longer lifetimes, I can either depopulate or control people who are angry that I'm living to be 145 and they're not, and I can basically keep them in check even though, so the mega-rich can live a very different luxurious life and control or shrink the rest of the population without fear because they have complete control. "So bottom line, in a time of radical technological change, which we're living through right now, the first result is societal chaos and revolutions and wars. And that's why I got the Bolsheviks, et cetera, et cetera. The people pushing this technological change or watching it from positions of authority know this. "And so the control grid would allow the transition to whatever this technological future is without the downside of like a Bolshevik revolution. So in my experience, the people who run the financial system are first and foremost risk managers. They don't think in terms of making money. They print money out of thin air. But they're very deeply careful about risk and they're very afraid of the guillotine. They're very afraid of the crowd. "But it's hard, it's hard to manage people. And if you look at, at coming into the development of digital technology and globalization, they had two choices. They could use this technology to build something that allowed explosive new decentralized wealth to be created. At which point how did they make sure they stay in control? Especially because you have so much going on that's secret. "So how do you stay in control? And, and can you create a bottom up structure that will behave responsibly? And the hard part of behaving responsibly is you as a manager of society have to turn the aircraft carrier before you hit the iceberg. You don't trust the crowd to care until you hit the iceberg and then it's too late. "So you decide, okay, we need a meritocracy. We can't trust the people. Now, I disagree with that. But so that was the model I was working on when I was making all this software. So I was saying we can have a bottom up structure that does the risk management, but builds the explosive wealth and it can work. But then you don't have an uber class. "But I think they decided, okay, the only way we find managing the general population very frustrating. And it's back to the red button story. We find them very hypocritical and irresponsible and frustrating. We are very frustrated, we are just going to go to complete control and they had to choose one or the other, and so they chose complete control. "The problem is once you get into complete control, you get an uber class of people who literally think of themselves as a different species." Carlson: "Yeah. And they may be actually. Sorry, excuse me."

Sense Receptor

18,160 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Strange Tests – Firing at a T-64B Tank from "Hyacinth" Almost Point-Blank.Comendante wondered, "Will the Ukrainian T-64 tank withstand a point-blank shot from the 152mm Hyacinth?" It's worth clarifying here that the hull design, including the VLD on the T-64 (T-64B = 30+80+105+20), is similar to that of the T-72.1st shot – tank displacement from the impact impulse, destruction of part of the plate welded to the VLD, damage from barrel fragments and destruction of the weld seam of the support (the lower 20mm part of the VLD), destruction of the turret ring. 2nd shot – shot at the joint between the turret and hull over the driver's hatch – breach of the hull roof.Further shooting 4 more times at the turret, glacis, and gun. What can be said here? – For a design developed in 1961 without requirements to withstand hits from a 152mm OFS from "Hyacinth," it's actually not bad.The breach of the front part of the hull roof upon explosion of an OF projectile is well-known, see - problem with the stability of the MV hatch on the T-64(A) when hit over the MV hatch is also known - raises another question – why haven't these issues been improved in 65 years? On the "newest" T-90M, it's the same hatch as on the 64. Cracks and detachments of parts also occur the topic of researching the damaging effect of high-explosive fragmentation shells on armor, see -The effectiveness of a 152mm high-explosive fragmentation shell against armor significantly depends on its velocity and angle of impact. At velocities over 800 m/s, the impulse force of the shells can reach 40-50 kN·s, which is 2-2.5 times greater than that of a 125mm high-explosive fragmentation shell; when the velocity decreases from 400 to 250 m/s, it decreases by 2 to 4 times... The impulse force when a 152mm shell hits a tank (at 800 m/s velocity) is 1.4-2 times greater compared to the impulse of a 125mm HE. INVESTIGATION OF THE DAMAGING EFFECT OF HIGH-EXPLOSIVE FRAGMENTATION SHELLS ON ARMOR (

Andrei_bt

26,662 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Who in the South Australian Parliament has got your back? Last night, the Malinauskas Government passed the Emergency Management (Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill 2024. Under the amended ‘General Powers’, section 25 of the Act, the State Co-ordinator and authorised officers are given the power to issue directions in any form, without limitation. These directions may: • Contravene another law of the State • Affect individual’s personal rights • and may use force to ensure compliance These directions can include: • Breaking into any land, building, structure or vehicle. • Taking possession or assuming control over any land, body of water. • Removing or destroying buildings, structures, vehicles, vegetations, and even animals. • Ordering real estate owners to forfeit control of their properties. • Removing people or animals. • Directing people to submit to a decontamination procedure • Directing people to isolate. I was the ONLY Member of Parliament who opposed these extraordinary measures – and the only one who presented significant measures to limit these powers. All Legislative Council members voted against my proposals to restrict and provide reasonable oversight of these excessive powers. In the absence of any parliamentary oversight or limitation on what many in the legal profession (including the Law Society) have characterised as “exceptionally broad and disproportionate executive powers”, the rights of South Australians have been put at considerable risk. When you vote in the Legislative Council next March, remember who stood up for the people against the power of the government, and who didn’t. Sarah Game Fair Go for Australians will always have your back.

Sarah Game MLC

62,295 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

DARPA and the CIA's new "MKULTRA project" mixed with A.I. and the construction of smart cities to incorporate a complete grid of control over the population. You wonder why they are starting the infrastructure for smart cities around the world. Minority Report wasn't just a movie. It was a warning of things to come. A grid of control that can not only monitor your finances and take away your privacy with security cameras, but technology that can literally induce emotions and behaviors and read and write thoughts in real time completely remotely. Through electromagnetic radiation, radio frequency, extremely-low frequency, light technology, 5G, A.I., smart wearable technology, like wireless earbuds, and smartwatches that measures changes in blood flow, etc., there are multiple technologies that they have been working on since the late 1950s that they have already mastered, to new technology that has now incorporated A.I. that can do things which once seemed impossible or of science fiction. The technology is already here and they are already quietly passing laws in an attempt to safe guard you literal brain privacy. Colorado was the first state to introduce such legislation. The WEF also talked about this extensively. This doesn't just allow governments and intel agencies to spy or control you, this also applies to big tech, making you feel a specific emotion when you read a specific political article, or implant an impulse to buy, something, or even do something sinister. These are the new systems of control they are implementing on us. It sounds unreal, but the reality is that it's already here and being used on you and you don't even know it.

The SCIF

72,506 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨Former Israeli Acting President Avraham Burg: Iran was NOT an existential threat for Israel, Netanyahu launched a WASTED war! ‘Hezbollah at the northern part of Israel is a problem, as an uncontrolled substate militia, it’s a problem for the Lebanese government, for the Israelis and maybe even for the Syrians. I mean, the entire triangle of the northern part of Israel should be troubled by the very existence and the kind of independence of Hezbollah. And something is to be done about it. Iran was not, if you ask me, an existential threat to Israel. It was a real problem. It was a real threat with the proxies and the fire and the fire belt around Israel and the provocations all over the Gulf and all over the Middle East. But it was not such an existential threat and could have been dealt differently by diplomacy, by agreements, by different equilibrium and balances. And last but not least, Hamas proved that October 7th 2023, that it is really very, very, very malicious and very criminal when it comes to their motivation to annihilate the state of Israel and to kill as many Israelis as possible. All these three are problems that Netanyahu believed, and unfortunately too many Israelis still believe that can be solved by muscles, by power, by military manoeuvres, without understanding the very ancient wisdom of war. A war that does not have a next step, which is political, which is agreement, which is a settlement, which is a kind of a new setting, is a wasted war. And all the victims, be them Israelis or be them Lebanese or innocent Gazan people or innocent Iranian people, are simply human sacrifice. It’s a waste. It’s a shame.’ -Avraham Burg joins us for Monday’s episode of Going Underground to discuss the US-Israeli war on Iran, and much more. Don’t miss it, follow us on X and follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies 👇

Going Underground

24,097 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is the result of a school system run by liberal white women who are “morally conflicted” about disciplining young Black men. When I was teaching, there was a pathological aversion to acknowledging the disproportionate number of Black boys with conduct disorders—outside of the predominant, ideologically-driven belief that white people and “whiteness” were ultimately to blame. (The “poverty argument” was simply an extension of this, since it was ultimately claimed that poverty caused these behaviors—rather than being a product of a culture and localized society that tolerates, or is at least afraid to confront, them.) To be sure, these behaviors often had a strong familial component. It didn’t take long, after meeting some of the parents, to understand why their children were behaving antisocially in school. But here’s the tragic irony: the school system’s failure to actively address these behavioral disorders—due to liberal educator pathology—exacerbated the problem. Why? Because, sadly, for many of these kids, the only “normal” adults they encountered were at school. For better or worse, teachers and school staff functioned as surrogate parents—and often, arguably, better ones, as they weren’t drug users, abusers, criminals, or simply incompetent. Yet—and this is the tragic part—the limited opportunity these students had to interact with a healthier and more stable adult environment was distorted by a school culture that didn’t treat them as human beings capable of rising above their circumstances. Instead, it treated them as “noble victims” whose antisocial, and at times savage, behavior was seen as a burden for white people to bear. And so, these children were allowed to continue engaging in behaviors that teachers and administrators would never tolerate from their own kids. They were subjected instead to experimental progressive behavioral philosophies and “interventions” that, at best, were ineffective—and at worst, actually incentivized the antisocial behavior by rewarding it with outcomes (such as specific forms of adult attention) the children craved. As a result, our school systems—particularly those in high-poverty urban centers—have produced, or at least facilitated the development of, young Black adults who have been conditioned by the system to behave however they want. And because, during most of their formative years, this behavior was never truly corrected or challenged, many are shocked—and enraged—when the real world pushes back through the enforcement arm of the law. Every video I’ve seen of a young Black man in a confrontation with police—aggressively resisting until severe force is used—reminds me of students I had who were allowed to do the same with minimal consequences from school staff. I spent many years trying to be the teacher who held them accountable and produced real behavioral change. Sometimes, it worked. But more often, any success I had was undercut by colleagues who refused to adopt similar expectations and consequences—or by superiors who actively undermined my efforts because they didn’t like the “optics” of the disproportionate disciplinary record you’d inevitably accumulate when working to reform a troubled Black teenager. If you think that sounds like a soul-destroying environment to work in, you’d be

Frank McCormick

15,130 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

Valerie Anne Smith

197,459 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr