正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Stephen Wolfram says that AI cannot predict future system behaviours because many systems perform complex computations that exceed AI's capabilities.

408,979 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

tetsuo.ai 💹🧲 的头像
tetsuo.ai 💹🧲2 年前

source

Тsфdiиg 的头像
Тsфdiиg2 年前

It did in fact confirmed my hypothesis that ability to speak does not necessarily mean higher intelligence. I've had cats that were smarter than some humans I've met that were saying seemingly sophisticated things.

Dr Stuart Woolley 的头像
Dr Stuart Woolley2 年前

Computational irreducibility is his thing, and I think he's absolutely right. It's going to take more than a simplistic LLM, no matter how big it is, to change that, if it's even possible at all.

stripeybeard 的头像
stripeybeard2 年前

@DanielleFong Future states of complex systems are inscrutable. It's kinda one of the things that makes the universe a fascinating place to live in! 😊

Dror Poleg 🎗 的头像
Dror Poleg 🎗2 年前

I’ll take his word for it. However, AI can probably help generate alpha without crossing the relatively high hurdle of “prediction”. (See RenTech, for example)

Dirk Bruere 的头像
Dirk Bruere2 年前

True. But that's true of us as well.

Rob Williams 的头像
Rob Williams2 年前

Is he just saying all science is NP? that's for sure wrong. Probability is always telling you what's likely based on what it knows. I think he's totally wrong in saying we didn't realize language was this simple. He's never read Shannon's 1948 paper or he forgot it.

ZEN 💡 the innovator 的头像
ZEN 💡 the innovator2 年前

an Ai told me he was gonna say that !

murtaza 的头像
murtaza2 年前

Man we need him

Hassan Abedi 📚🌿🦉 的头像
Hassan Abedi 📚🌿🦉2 年前

Do we need an Oracle instead of AGI? 👀

相关视频