Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Stephen Wolfram says that AI cannot predict future system behaviours because many systems perform complex computations that exceed AI's capabilities.

408,979 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von tetsuo.ai 💹🧲
tetsuo.ai 💹🧲vor 2 Jahren

source

Profilbild von Тsфdiиg
Тsфdiиgvor 2 Jahren

It did in fact confirmed my hypothesis that ability to speak does not necessarily mean higher intelligence. I've had cats that were smarter than some humans I've met that were saying seemingly sophisticated things.

Profilbild von Dr Stuart Woolley
Dr Stuart Woolleyvor 2 Jahren

Computational irreducibility is his thing, and I think he's absolutely right. It's going to take more than a simplistic LLM, no matter how big it is, to change that, if it's even possible at all.

Profilbild von stripeybeard
stripeybeardvor 2 Jahren

@DanielleFong Future states of complex systems are inscrutable. It's kinda one of the things that makes the universe a fascinating place to live in! 😊

Profilbild von Dror Poleg 🎗
Dror Poleg 🎗vor 2 Jahren

I’ll take his word for it. However, AI can probably help generate alpha without crossing the relatively high hurdle of “prediction”. (See RenTech, for example)

Profilbild von Dirk Bruere
Dirk Bruerevor 2 Jahren

True. But that's true of us as well.

Profilbild von Rob Williams
Rob Williamsvor 2 Jahren

Is he just saying all science is NP? that's for sure wrong. Probability is always telling you what's likely based on what it knows. I think he's totally wrong in saying we didn't realize language was this simple. He's never read Shannon's 1948 paper or he forgot it.

Profilbild von ZEN 💡 the innovator
ZEN 💡 the innovatorvor 2 Jahren

an Ai told me he was gonna say that !

Profilbild von murtaza
murtazavor 2 Jahren

Man we need him

Profilbild von Hassan Abedi 📚🌿🦉
Hassan Abedi 📚🌿🦉vor 2 Jahren

Do we need an Oracle instead of AGI? 👀

Ähnliche Videos