Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Swedish Erotica 60 - "Three Way Split" Featuring Cast : Two unknown girls and John Holmes. #GoldenAgeOfPorn #goldenageofporn #SwedishErotica

57,837 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

ELON MUSK: “We had the third consecutive failure of the Falcon 1 rocket for SpaceX. Tesla almost went bankrupt. We closed our financing round 6 p.m. Christmas Eve, 2008. It was the last hour of the last day that it was possible. We would have gone bankrupt two days after Christmas otherwise. What's your pain threshold? Well, it's real high. So, yeah, SpaceX is alive by the skin of its teeth. So is Tesla. If things had just gone a little bit the other way, both companies would be dead. And one of the most difficult choices I have ever faced in life was in 2008. I think I had maybe $30 million or $40 million left in 2008, and I had two choices. I could put it all into one company, and then the other company would definitely die. Or split it between the two companies. But if I split it between the two companies, then both might die. And when you put your blood, sweat, and tears into creating something, building something, it's like a child. So it's like, which one am I going to let one starve to death? I couldn't bring myself to do it, so I split the money between the two. Fortunately, thank goodness, they both came through. (2:00) ... Well, there's a ton of failures along the way, that's for sure. As I said, for SpaceX, the first three launches failed. We were just barely able to scrape together enough parts and money to do the fourth launch. If that fourth launch had failed, we would have been dead. So, multiple failures along the way. I tried very hard to get the right expertise in for SpaceX. I tried hard to find a great chief engineer for the rocket, but the good chief engineers wouldn't join, and the bad ones, well, there was no point in hiring them, so I ended up being chief engineer of the rocket. So if I could have found somebody better, then we would have maybe had less than three failures.”

Dima Zeniuk

90,527 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The original choice for the role of 'Lisa' in John Hughes's "Weird Science" (1985) was then unknown Robin Wright. But John Hughes lost her when her agent got her a role in the TV Show, "Santa Barbara". About Wright, casting director Jackie Burch said, "“She was not voluptuous but still hot for young boys" Kelly Emberg, a model and cover girl was cast in the part. But the problem with her was that she couldn't act. Hughes asked Burch to find someone who was “gorgeous and can act.” She found Kelly LeBrock. According to Kelly LeBrock, she turned down the role when it was offered to her first because she was having way too much fun in the South of France with Sting and she didn't want to go to the USA. After about three weeks of shooting, the one hired instead of LeBrock was fired. LeBrock was called again and they said, "we will give you whatever you want". She got on the flight to Chicago the very next day. About her experience during the early days of filming, LeBrock said, "My first scene was the shower scene, and I was forced to wear the previous actress’s wardrobe. She was a completely different body type than I was so a lot of the outfits had to be modified for them to work. Also they were three weeks into production and already knew each other, and I am the new person on set. Plus it was only my second movie, so it was very stressful for me." ("John Hughes: A Life in Film", Kirk Honeycutt, 2015 & Kelly LeBrock's interview with Adam Lawton, Mediamikes, 2010)

DepressedBergman

24,182 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Samuel Cohen, the Oxford mathematician who proved there is exactly one correct way to measure uncertainty, and nobody has found a way around it since: "I used to think there could be many reasonable ways to measure uncertainty. Then I proved that only one survives three simple rules, and the moment I saw it collapse into a single formula, it changed how I look at every unknown since." this is the exact proof sitting quietly underneath every signal a trading desk treats as informative, and almost nobody outside a math department has ever seen the three rules that force it into existence. strip away the notation and the setup is simple. surprise should shrink continuously as an event gets more likely, and the surprise of two independent events happening together should just add up. those two rules sound harmless. but they're strict enough that only one function in all of mathematics can satisfy them, and it happens to be a logarithm, not something anyone would guess by intuition alone. nobody calling a signal "highly informative" out loud credits the proof that defines what informative even means. zoom out to what this quietly powers today. every model comparing a live market to its own prediction, every benchmark measuring how far a forecast drifted from reality, is built on this exact same formula for surprise, just wearing a different name. the industry sells "information edge" like it's a vibe, something a good trader just feels. but the entire concept has a precise, provable definition, and almost nobody using the term could derive it from scratch. surprise was never just a feeling. it was the only function that could survive three simple rules, and everything else quietly collapsed under them. Bookmark this legend and follow MindArch for more alpha.

MindArch

23,075 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten