正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Tesla’s Robotaxi fleet could start growing pretty quickly from here! Cern Basher is modeling what happens if autonomous miles keep growing around 17% every week. Based on Ashok’s update of roughly 145K miles in one week, that could mean around 137 cars averaging 150 miles a day. But here’s...

25,298 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

Doctor Jack 的头像
Doctor Jack6 天前

@CernBasher

Hmmmmm? 的头像
Hmmmmm?6 天前

@CernBasher Cybercab is the smaller story,.. Optimus has gone dark and is going to explode onto the scene.. Its going to absolutely dominate.. they will one day say they have 100,000 bots..

Peter de Vietien 的头像
Peter de Vietien6 天前

@CernBasher Austin TAM is probably ~20k Cybercabs >GPT Estimates ~7,000 human ride hailing cars operating daily in Austin. > Cybercab is ~1/10th the fully considered lifetime cost per mile of operation >> CC can offer 70% fare reduction >>> Austin TAM is probably > 20k Cybercabs

Matticus42069 的头像
Matticus420696 天前

@CernBasher Do you ever have any constructive criticism of Tesla?

30sectoMars 的头像
30sectoMars6 天前

@CernBasher Talk all you want…until there’s EPS revisions…Tesla stock will continue to chop around in a range that it’s been stuck in for six years now

Timmy Moslen 的头像
Timmy Moslen5 天前

@CernBasher Elon always proves you wrong. Gives you bread crumbs and you guys get carried away.

Quentin Cassidy 的头像
Quentin Cassidy5 天前

@CernBasher What's the obsession with modeling out 17% growth week after week. It's meaningless.

Stefan H. 的头像
Stefan H.6 天前

@CernBasher >>An autonomous supersonic tsunami is coming.<<

philip Teng 的头像
philip Teng5 天前

@CernBasher Remember Tesla has millions of potential robotaxis in private owner car, if they decide to pull that lever and just test it , it would completely rerate Tesla value overnight

Simon Manning 的头像
Simon Manning5 天前

@CernBasher Cybercab is an iphone and ipad moment on steroids. There is no one else i view. No-one else has the data the network and solved robotics. The price wont wait for confirmation imop.

frank 的头像
frank6 天前

@CernBasher One of the best people on the subject of 17% weekly miles growth is @GrindeOptions $tsla

Glip 的头像
Glip6 天前

@CernBasher Cars are learning to drive themselves because waiting for drivers to learn was taking too long.

Joyce Lynn 的头像
Joyce Lynn6 天前

@CernBasher Interesting discussion… CERN’s insights telling… Then there’s @CernBasher charts, models, another level.💫

Silver Dog 的头像
Silver Dog5 天前

Cern is wearing on me with the whole “if everything stays static, and I put these numbers in my spreadsheet, voila - which is French for…and then I found out - Tesla stock is one hundred bazillion dollars!” It’s not going to play out this way. Much is priced in. Happy to be proven wrong.

Gary L 的头像
Gary L5 天前

@CernBasher Could!? Way to go out on a limb!

Infamous 的头像
Infamous6 天前

@CernBasher All these projection just to get beaten by sp500 over half a decade along with lost opportunity which never can't be compensated even stock price hits 1000 within next year

AndyXAndersen 的头像
AndyXAndersen6 天前

@CernBasher No. There will likely a hard stall and federal probe, followed by some years in wilderness. See Cruise.

Dr D 的头像
Dr D5 天前

@CernBasher I modelled it if Tesla grows at 200% per week. OMG!!!!!

Randy Cyrenne 的头像
Randy Cyrenne6 天前

@CernBasher ....Lets us know when it "does"

Joey 的头像
Joey6 天前

@CernBasher Maybe 🤔

🇮🇱Oran Ami-ge🇮🇱 的头像
🇮🇱Oran Ami-ge🇮🇱6 天前

@CernBasher $TSLA 🤞🏻👇

Tes Obs 的头像
Tes Obs6 天前

@CernBasher More Koolaid we will drink 😉 😜

🇳🇱 Hildebrand 的头像
🇳🇱 Hildebrand5 天前

@CernBasher Can Tesla hire enough remote supervisors to scale this fast, until FSD is ready to be really unsupervised?

MarketMaverick 的头像
MarketMaverick5 天前

@CernBasher Regulation won’t let it

DKnotMetcalf 的头像
DKnotMetcalf6 天前

PE of 330!! 1-2M robotaxis before the PE gets to the 30s. That’s 3 years away. Optimus? Maybe next year they sell a few. What holds the stock price up til then? My theory is rhe SpaceX takeover rumor is supposed to do the heavy lifting. Maybe for awhile. PS: the 85% institutional ownership is complete BS. Low 40s. Ask Grok.

William Harding 的头像
William Harding5 天前

@CernBasher @grok what would the graph look like if Cybercab scales as quickly as Ashok suggests ? Can you please draw it?

Jon Kling 的头像
Jon Kling6 天前

@CernBasher Need someone to count as they come out of factory to try to nail down production rates

Justin Friesen 的头像
Justin Friesen6 天前

@CernBasher What about the issue with approvals to allow the cyber cab with no manual break, it seems likely Tesla will wait for that hurdle to be cleared fore going far beyond 2500 vehicles in USA

hybridcarguy 的头像
hybridcarguy6 天前

@CernBasher I know nothing but i will play the expert, just like I got it all wrong for the last 10 years and take 0 accountability for it.

Richie Rick 的头像
Richie Rick6 天前

@CernBasher 👀

carlosfagar 的头像
carlosfagar6 天前

@CernBasher Mi estimación es 250.000 Cybercabs operando en EE.UU. para generar un beneficio comparable al del segmento de energía de 2025. Unos 6.400 Cybercabs por ciudad de más de 500.000 habitantes de EEUU 🇺🇸 ( 39 ciudades).

Michael Rozman 的头像
Michael Rozman6 天前

When analyzing the total accumulation of a simple exponential growth curve, taking two early-phase data points and treating that accumulation curve as a fixed-rate exponential curve will cause your future projections to drastically fail. Here is why that projection falls apart: 📉 The False "Constant" Rate: In the early phase, the accumulation's percentage growth rate is changing rapidly, starting very low and climbing steeply week over week. If you take two early points and assume that specific growth rate will remain constant, you are freezing your model at the system's slowest, weakest moment. 🚀 Underestimating the Underlying Speed: Because you captured the accumulation curve while it was lagging far behind the actual growth curve's speed, a simple projection completely misses the massive acceleration happening underneath. 💥 The Compounding Error: If you project the future using that early, artificially low "constant" rate, your long-term predictions will heavily underestimate the real future accumulation, with the error gap widening exponentially over time. The Reality: The accumulation curve of a simple exponential function is not a simple exponential function itself—it is a shifted curve with a subtracted baseline. To project the future accurately from early data, you must use calculus to find the underlying curve's true growth rate first, rather than treating the accumulation itself as a fixed-rate tracker.

BoomBoomXYZ 的头像
BoomBoomXYZ5 天前

@CernBasher focking lol... two liars together... have you EVER adresses the MOUNTAIN of your past FAILED predictions...? NO?! So why the fock should anybody listen to your new (already failed) predictions?:???

Wesley Dodds 的头像
Wesley Dodds6 天前

@CernBasher This episode was very insightful. Thank you. @CernBasher - Care to model out how many Unsupervised Robotaxi’s deployed and how long to prove 10x safer than human drivers? Next episode?

Eggman 的头像
Eggman6 天前

@CernBasher Its not a pure profit business ​• Daily cleaning & biohazards • Commercial liability insurance • Deadhead miles (zero fare) • Rapid tire/suspension wear • Remote human supervisors • Depot real estate & charging

相关视频

Biggest warning I’ll give Tesla shorts right now. This time, you’re probably not going to get fucked by some classic short squeeze. You’re going to get fucked by being wrong about what Tesla becomes next. Look at the latest short-interest tape. As of the Aug 14 settlement: • 69,196,896 $TSLA shares short • ~2.2% of the float • 2.15 days to cover • ~$23.7 BILLION worth of stock short And the important part is that… Short interest peaked at 79.1M shares on June 30. So roughly 12.5% of those shorts had already been covered by August 14. So no… I’m NOT sitting here telling you that shorts are trapped. That’s not my thesis. My thesis is actually much more dangerous for a long-term Tesla short. What if they’re simply wrong? Wrong about autonomy. Wrong about Robotaxi. Wrong about Cybercab. And ultimately wrong about what Tesla’s earnings power could look like if this scales. Bc I’ve now watched this story go from something people laughed at… to something I personally rode in. My first Tesla Robotaxi ride in Austin was on launch day, June 22, 2025. Then I came back for the Cybercab launch on September 3, 2026. And it changed the way I look at Tesla. Cybercab isn’t something with Elon standing on a stage telling you what might happen five years from now. You can literally hail one. Pay for a ride. Get inside. There’s no steering wheel. No accelerator. No brake pedal. And it takes paying passengers through real Austin streets. Tesla itself now describes Cybercab as a fully autonomous, purpose-built two-seater in its Robotaxi fleet. That matters... Bc Tesla is no longer trying to prove that Robotaxi can exist bc it does exist. The next question is whether Tesla can scale it safely, economically and fast enough. And THAT is where I think shorts are massively underestimating the company. As of the latest Texas registry data, Tesla has 437 authorized vehicles in Texas - 388 Model Ys/49 Cybercabs It shows how quickly the fleet Tesla is preparing for commercial autonomy is growing. Now zoom out a bit. Tesla already lists more than 125,000 units of installed annual Cybercab manufacturing capacity in Texas. This is INSTALLED capacity. And Tesla calls Cybercab the “workhorse” of its Robotaxi fleet. Tesla spent most of its history making $ by building a vehicle and selling it once. Robotaxi opens a completely different model. Build the vehicle once. Then potentially monetize that same asset again. and again. and again. every time somebody takes a ride. Instead of only asking: “How many cars can Tesla sell this quarter?” You start asking: “How many autonomous miles can Tesla sell every day?” That is a MASSIVE change in the business model. And Cybercab is built specifically for that job. Not around a driver. Around the rider. If Tesla can bring those pieces together at scale, it has the potential to build a transportation network where the machine itself replaces THE largest costs in traditional ride-hailing: the human driver. Then there’s the flywheel. More Cybercabs. More geographic coverage. Shorter wait times. More rides. Higher fleet utilization. More recurring revenue. More capital to deploy even more vehicles. Tesla itself has told investors it expects hardware profits over time to be joined by accelerating AI, software and fleet-based profits. Does Tesla still have to execute? Absolutely. Regulation matters. Safety matters. Utilization matters. Manufacturing ramp matters. The economics have to work at scale. Those are legitimate risks, and anyone pretending otherwise isn’t being serious. But the serious Tesla short thesis can’t just be: “Elon promised autonomy before.” An actual bear now has to explain why a steering-wheel-free vehicle that is already carrying paying passengers won’t scale into a meaningful business. Tesla shorts are still betting against a car company, but I bet Cybercab is about to prove they’re shorting a transportation network.

Teslaconomics

34,223 次观看 • 2 天前

Whenever I tell people when you buy a Tesla, make sure you eat the cost and buy FSD outright, a majority of people always tell me “FSD is too expensive at $8,000,” without actually looking at the data and numbers behind the true value of FSD. Well, I did. Back in 2019, Elon explained the Robotaxi economics very clearly. “What would be the probable gross profit from a single Robotaxi? We think probably something on the order of $30,000 per year.” BTW, this number also came from conservative assumptions. • ~90,000 miles per year • ~50% utilization (half the miles are non-revenue) • Operating cost around $0.18 per mile (fyi, gas cars are closer to $0.60!) • Tesla takes 25-30% of the revenue • Robotaxi designed to last ~1 million miles So after costs, after Tesla’s cut, and after conservative usage, the estimate still came out to $30,000 per year from a single Robotaxi. So let me do the simple math for you. If a Robotaxi generates $30,000 per year, and you assume just 10 years of useful Robotaxi life, even though the car is going to be designed for more: 1/ $30,000 × 10 years = $300,000 Now, let’s cut that number by 50% for uncertainty, downtime, or slower rollout… I’m being conservative here. 2/ $300,000 ÷ 2 = $150,000 That means the FSD value is NOT $8,000. It’s six figures! This is why every Tesla owner should buy FSD outright right now! And is also the reason why Tesla is ending this option in February imo. You see, this is what happens when you see FSD as an income generating business, instead of just a feature. FSD is SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued. And whenever I tell people that I’m going to be the biggest Tesla Robotaxi fleet operator one day and show the world how much $ I’m making for each Robotaxi in operation, they all still laugh at me in disbelief. (I hope Elon and Tesla will let me be one of the first owners when the time comes… 🤞) But I also know that people always doubted me my whole life… until things actually became real. That’s why I’ve never seen my Tesla as just a car that depreciates like other non-Teslas. It’s the exact opposite. And one day, when these cars are driving themselves and generating $ income for me while I’m sleeping, all of the doubters will become silent. Mark my words.

Teslaconomics

154,677 次观看 • 7 个月前