正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The difference couldn't be clearer. BTS responded with one powerful starement: "We hope music itself can be heard and loved rather than being distinguished by region or language." That's it. No attacks. No self-victimization. Mo essays. Just a principle that applies to every artist, everywhere. They didn't take a... stand for just BTS. They took a stand for music itself. Meanwhile, the people defending these categories have written pages upon pages trying to justify why artists should continue to be separated by region. They say it's about representation. They say it's about bringing people closer. But if your version of inclusion starts by putting artists into separate boxes, you've already contradicted your own argument. That's what makes BTS's statement so powerful. It isn't about one group, one fandom, or one award show. It's a philosophy. Music should be heard for what it is and NOT filtered through geography, language, or ethnicity. Sometimes the strongest message is also the shortest. And the fact that one sentence has sparked pages of explanations from the people defending the system says more than enough.show more

♡

2,462 subscribers

23,718 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Recording Academy has never faced this level of public scrutiny over one of its own decisions ever before. BTS didn't ignite this discussion for personal gain. They challenged a principle that affects artists far beyond themselves. — “We hope music itself can be heard and loved rather than being distinguished by region or language” Their message is bigger than anything. It's a call for unity over division and universality over segregation. Now it's our turn. Keep the conversation going. Keep asking the difficult questions. Keep advocating for a music industry that recognizes excellence without creating separate lanes. Music belongs to everyone. #ArtHasNoAliens

The Recording Academy has never faced this level of public scrutiny over one of its own decisions ever before. BTS didn't ignite this discussion for personal gain. They challenged a principle that affects artists far beyond themselves. — “We hope music itself can be heard and loved rather than being distinguished by region or language” Their message is bigger than anything. It's a call for unity over division and universality over segregation. Now it's our turn. Keep the conversation going. Keep asking the difficult questions. Keep advocating for a music industry that recognizes excellence without creating separate lanes. Music belongs to everyone. #ArtHasNoAliens

♡

24,879 次观看 • 5 天前

And the fact that BTS made their statement in Korean 😎 MAD RESPECT for Bangtan🫡 Because of this ALIENation, creating a whole new category just to put BTS in an “Asian box”, BTS took a stand. This is exactly what “ALIENS” is all about. Everybody knows BTS is a strong contender at the Grammys for their critically acclaimed album ARIRANG. And by not submitting, they’re sending the loudest message an artist can send: they don’t need a side category to be validated by the West. Yes, BTS dreams of a Grammy. But if that dream means being discriminated against like this, they know it isn’t worth it. Being the FIRST is not always important, but rather, leaving an IMPACT and a LEGACY is what really counts! Bangtan is on the right track💪🏽 “We have decided not to submit for the Grammys this year. Rather than being categorized by region or language, we hope music can be heard and loved for what it is. We sincerely thank ARMY and everyone who is always with us.” - BTS July 29, 2026 WE ARE PROUD OF YOU BTS

And the fact that BTS made their statement in Korean 😎 MAD RESPECT for Bangtan🫡 Because of this ALIENation, creating a whole new category just to put BTS in an “Asian box”, BTS took a stand. This is exactly what “ALIENS” is all about. Everybody knows BTS is a strong contender at the Grammys for their critically acclaimed album ARIRANG. And by not submitting, they’re sending the loudest message an artist can send: they don’t need a side category to be validated by the West. Yes, BTS dreams of a Grammy. But if that dream means being discriminated against like this, they know it isn’t worth it. Being the FIRST is not always important, but rather, leaving an IMPACT and a LEGACY is what really counts! Bangtan is on the right track💪🏽 “We have decided not to submit for the Grammys this year. Rather than being categorized by region or language, we hope music can be heard and loved for what it is. We sincerely thank ARMY and everyone who is always with us.” - BTS July 29, 2026 WE ARE PROUD OF YOU BTS

HobiCasa ⊙⊝⊜ARIRANG 🐿️🧡🪥🤳👟

56,457 次观看 • 7 天前

[News] BTS has declared that they will not submit their music to next year's Grammy Awards. Stating that music should not be categorized by region and language, they delivered a sharp jab at the Grammys for recently creating a new Asian music category. All seven members of BTS posted simultaneous messages on their social media stating they would not be submitting their work to the Grammy Awards. They wrote that they hope music can be heard and loved for what it is, rather than being categorized by region or language. Previously, The Recording Academy, which hosts the Grammy Awards, established the "Best Asian Pop Music Performance" category starting next year. They set criteria requiring the use of an Asian language in a meaningful way and for the music to be based in or recognized locally within Asia. Although they explained this as recognition of Asian Pop's growing influence in the global music industry, criticism arose that this move creates a barrier rather than expanding diversity. The criticism points out that it confines K-pop to "Asian Pop" rather than global pop music, effectively blocking K-pop stars from winning awards in the main categories. Even after sweeping the Billboard Music Awards and the American Music Awards, BTS continued to knock on the door of the Grammys. Through hit songs like "Dynamite" and "Butter," they were nominated for three consecutive years starting in 2021, but ultimately failed to win. Fans voiced their support on the Grammys' official social media accounts, posting comments such as "BTS doesn't need to prove themselves through a Grammy Award". Kim Doheon (Pop Music Critic): "Through this declaration, I expect the controversy to intensify over what Asian Pop truly is and what issues Asian artists (submitting to the Grammys) are contemplating." Boasting one of the most powerful fandoms in the world, attention is focused on what changes BTS's decision will bring to the Western-centric music industry, including the Grammy Awards.

[News] BTS has declared that they will not submit their music to next year's Grammy Awards. Stating that music should not be categorized by region and language, they delivered a sharp jab at the Grammys for recently creating a new Asian music category. All seven members of BTS posted simultaneous messages on their social media stating they would not be submitting their work to the Grammy Awards. They wrote that they hope music can be heard and loved for what it is, rather than being categorized by region or language. Previously, The Recording Academy, which hosts the Grammy Awards, established the "Best Asian Pop Music Performance" category starting next year. They set criteria requiring the use of an Asian language in a meaningful way and for the music to be based in or recognized locally within Asia. Although they explained this as recognition of Asian Pop's growing influence in the global music industry, criticism arose that this move creates a barrier rather than expanding diversity. The criticism points out that it confines K-pop to "Asian Pop" rather than global pop music, effectively blocking K-pop stars from winning awards in the main categories. Even after sweeping the Billboard Music Awards and the American Music Awards, BTS continued to knock on the door of the Grammys. Through hit songs like "Dynamite" and "Butter," they were nominated for three consecutive years starting in 2021, but ultimately failed to win. Fans voiced their support on the Grammys' official social media accounts, posting comments such as "BTS doesn't need to prove themselves through a Grammy Award". Kim Doheon (Pop Music Critic): "Through this declaration, I expect the controversy to intensify over what Asian Pop truly is and what issues Asian artists (submitting to the Grammys) are contemplating." Boasting one of the most powerful fandoms in the world, attention is focused on what changes BTS's decision will bring to the Western-centric music industry, including the Grammy Awards.

kin

38,256 次观看 • 7 天前

Some people thought it was a good thing that the Grammys created new categories, but this isn't something to celebrate—it's something to be concerned about. This is xenophobia disguised as new categories. They also added another Latin category after Bad Bunny won Album of the Year and was nominated for Song of the Year and Record of the Year. Because music is music, and it shouldn't continue to be separated into categories based on language.

Some people thought it was a good thing that the Grammys created new categories, but this isn't something to celebrate—it's something to be concerned about. This is xenophobia disguised as new categories. They also added another Latin category after Bad Bunny won Album of the Year and was nominated for Song of the Year and Record of the Year. Because music is music, and it shouldn't continue to be separated into categories based on language.

BAD BUNNY DAILY UPDATES

152,296 次观看 • 7 天前

ELON: MEDIA CONTROLS YOU BY WHAT IT DOESN’T SAY “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Source: Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 2024

ELON: MEDIA CONTROLS YOU BY WHAT IT DOESN’T SAY “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Source: Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

36,388 次观看 • 11 个月前

ELON MUSK: You can't simultaneously say that there is systemic racist oppression but also that races don't exist, that race is a social construct > The media used to be racist against black people and sexist against women; now it is racist against white people and Asians, and sexist against men > They just want to change the target, but really they shouldn't be racist and sexist at all > Racism is racism in the absolute. There just needs to be consistency > If it's okay to have Black, Asian, or Indian Pride, it should be okay to have White Pride too > If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of all religions (provided they aren't oppressive) > The goal should be ensuring consistency to eliminate bias > If it is possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race > It's a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane and people go insane

ELON MUSK: You can't simultaneously say that there is systemic racist oppression but also that races don't exist, that race is a social construct > The media used to be racist against black people and sexist against women; now it is racist against white people and Asians, and sexist against men > They just want to change the target, but really they shouldn't be racist and sexist at all > Racism is racism in the absolute. There just needs to be consistency > If it's okay to have Black, Asian, or Indian Pride, it should be okay to have White Pride too > If it's okay to be proud of one religion, it should be okay to be proud of all religions (provided they aren't oppressive) > The goal should be ensuring consistency to eliminate bias > If it is possible to be racist against one race, it is possible to be racist against any race > It's a logical inconsistency that makes AIs go insane and people go insane

X Freeze

66,719 次观看 • 8 个月前

Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes the goal of "The Great Taking" "it's much darker than [they] just want to control people... It is about destroying populations... It's that they intend that you will not exist" "It's not that they need your stuff. They can create unlimited amounts of money" "It's not that they need your stuff or your money. It's that they do not want you to have have your stuff and your money" "It is about subjugation of populations" "It's even worse than being about control. Because they have control now. They have total control now" "So what is happening now is beyond having total control" "It is about destroying populations" "So it's much darker than that [they] just want to control people" "First people think it's that they want to make money. No, it's much worse than that. [Then they think] it's that they want control—no, it's much worse than that. It's that they intend that you will not exist" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026.

Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes the goal of "The Great Taking" "it's much darker than [they] just want to control people... It is about destroying populations... It's that they intend that you will not exist" "It's not that they need your stuff. They can create unlimited amounts of money" "It's not that they need your stuff or your money. It's that they do not want you to have have your stuff and your money" "It is about subjugation of populations" "It's even worse than being about control. Because they have control now. They have total control now" "So what is happening now is beyond having total control" "It is about destroying populations" "So it's much darker than that [they] just want to control people" "First people think it's that they want to make money. No, it's much worse than that. [Then they think] it's that they want control—no, it's much worse than that. It's that they intend that you will not exist" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026.

Sense Receptor

103,885 次观看 • 1 个月前

[JTBC News] 260730 Lee Ga-hyeok's One Shot Today. BTS's Polite Boycott 🐹From BTS Jin's Instagram: "We have decided not to submit our music to the Grammys this year. We hope music will be heard and loved for what it is, rather than being divided by region or language. Thank you to ARMY and to everyone who has always supported us." 👨‍🏫All 7 BTS members posted these same words simultaneously. It was, in effect, 'a declaration of a Grammy boycott'. Because they offered no explanation beyond those three sentences, fans and people across the music industry around the world have been interpreting the reasons in different ways. However, many believe it was a protest against the Grammys' recent creation of a separate Best Asian Pop category. Some have praised the new category as a way to expand opportunities for Asian artists. Others, however, have questioned whether it simply places Asian artists into a separate box rather than allowing them to compete equally. The Grammys, which have long faced criticism for being overly favorable toward the white mainstream music industry, may have brought this controversy upon themselves. 👨‍🏫Whatever the reason, BTS's "polite boycott" encourages us to rethink our long-standing habit of seeking validation from outside Korea by saying things like, "Foreign media reported it," "Hollywood recognized it," or "The U.S. market responded." In other words, BTS's boycott represents a refreshing shift in perspective: refusing to be confined by a system created by others. It will be interesting to see what changes this confident declaration of independence will bring. This has been One Shot Today. #JIN #방탄소년단진 방탄소년단 The anchor ended the entire news segment with Jin's Instagram post.

[JTBC News] 260730 Lee Ga-hyeok's One Shot Today. BTS's Polite Boycott 🐹From BTS Jin's Instagram: "We have decided not to submit our music to the Grammys this year. We hope music will be heard and loved for what it is, rather than being divided by region or language. Thank you to ARMY and to everyone who has always supported us." 👨‍🏫All 7 BTS members posted these same words simultaneously. It was, in effect, 'a declaration of a Grammy boycott'. Because they offered no explanation beyond those three sentences, fans and people across the music industry around the world have been interpreting the reasons in different ways. However, many believe it was a protest against the Grammys' recent creation of a separate Best Asian Pop category. Some have praised the new category as a way to expand opportunities for Asian artists. Others, however, have questioned whether it simply places Asian artists into a separate box rather than allowing them to compete equally. The Grammys, which have long faced criticism for being overly favorable toward the white mainstream music industry, may have brought this controversy upon themselves. 👨‍🏫Whatever the reason, BTS's "polite boycott" encourages us to rethink our long-standing habit of seeking validation from outside Korea by saying things like, "Foreign media reported it," "Hollywood recognized it," or "The U.S. market responded." In other words, BTS's boycott represents a refreshing shift in perspective: refusing to be confined by a system created by others. It will be interesting to see what changes this confident declaration of independence will bring. This has been One Shot Today. #JIN #방탄소년단진 방탄소년단 The anchor ended the entire news segment with Jin's Instagram post.

star_jin

23,019 次观看 • 5 天前

.David Deutsch: Everyone can and should be a scientist, because being a scientist just means wanting to understand the world and using the only method of doing so that works, namely, to be puzzled, to be mistaken, to guess how one might be mistaken and how the grand authorities who can't imagine that they could be mistaken often are, and not to be satisfied with bad explanations, one's own or anyone's, that is, explanations that could have otherwise and you'd be none the wiser. That's the critical attitude. It's the only access to reality that we have. Use it. It's fun.

.David Deutsch: Everyone can and should be a scientist, because being a scientist just means wanting to understand the world and using the only method of doing so that works, namely, to be puzzled, to be mistaken, to guess how one might be mistaken and how the grand authorities who can't imagine that they could be mistaken often are, and not to be satisfied with bad explanations, one's own or anyone's, that is, explanations that could have otherwise and you'd be none the wiser. That's the critical attitude. It's the only access to reality that we have. Use it. It's fun.

Deutsch Explains

21,523 次观看 • 1 年前

ah he's a genius- you can technically quantify bts the group, bts the brand, by how much money they make, by the economic impact they create, but that isn't what makes bts BTS. and we've said it so many times, you can copy bts' every move and it still won't give you the same results, because what makes bts unique, what their real essence is, is their bonds with each other. the many trials they've weathered together for all these years with army, THAT isn't able to be replicated. and the people who look in from the outside can pull out numbers or career milestones and have one part of bts, but they don't know the whole of them.

✿❀cam❀✿⁷ is seeing bts ⊙⊝⊜

18,759 次观看 • 2 个月前

No Muslim should listen to this nor allow their children to listen to these type of people. They are promoting Shirk & magic through music and industry personalities. It’s a bigger issue than just music itself, and the Devil has a long term agenda and goal: for people to disbelieve, while they may be unaware. It’s nurturing a generation upon immorality and indecency. The greatest sin and crime in Islam is Shirk. There’s no middle ground. Also saying numbers with unknown or secret meanings like 67 or unclear statements is one of the ways to promote Sihr.

Sensitive content

No Muslim should listen to this nor allow their children to listen to these type of people. They are promoting Shirk & magic through music and industry personalities. It’s a bigger issue than just music itself, and the Devil has a long term agenda and goal: for people to disbelieve, while they may be unaware. It’s nurturing a generation upon immorality and indecency. The greatest sin and crime in Islam is Shirk. There’s no middle ground. Also saying numbers with unknown or secret meanings like 67 or unclear statements is one of the ways to promote Sihr.

Germantown Masjid

20,383 次观看 • 9 个月前

.Naval: Smart people, capable people, don't let themselves be pigeonholed into one definition. That is a disease of credentialism because we created this university system, and now you have to go to university and get a degree in something. Then people ask, "What is your expertise? What is your credential?" That's a question dumb people ask. Smart people don't ask that. Smart people don't need to know your credentials. They just talk to you for five minutes, and they figure out if you know what you're talking about or not. A really good person, a so-called natural philosopher, can be good at any branch of anything. Nature has no boundaries. Nature has no concept of mathematics versus physics versus chemistry. It is all one thing. Anyone who's either meditated, done psychedelics, or read enough books, they figure that out: it's all one thing. When you find one thing, it connects to the next thing, connects to the next thing, connects to the next thing. And true creativity jumps boundaries. It can go from anywhere to anywhere. It doesn't have to follow a path of interconnections in between.

.Naval: Smart people, capable people, don't let themselves be pigeonholed into one definition. That is a disease of credentialism because we created this university system, and now you have to go to university and get a degree in something. Then people ask, "What is your expertise? What is your credential?" That's a question dumb people ask. Smart people don't ask that. Smart people don't need to know your credentials. They just talk to you for five minutes, and they figure out if you know what you're talking about or not. A really good person, a so-called natural philosopher, can be good at any branch of anything. Nature has no boundaries. Nature has no concept of mathematics versus physics versus chemistry. It is all one thing. Anyone who's either meditated, done psychedelics, or read enough books, they figure that out: it's all one thing. When you find one thing, it connects to the next thing, connects to the next thing, connects to the next thing. And true creativity jumps boundaries. It can go from anywhere to anywhere. It doesn't have to follow a path of interconnections in between.

Arjun Khemani

369,474 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

Elon Musk: Information should bubble up from the people, not be decided by a few editors-in-chief. “We should have the free marketplace of ideas. People can propose an idea, people can discuss an idea. They can make a statement, people can rebut that. The people can decide. And I think it's far better for information to bubble up from the voice of the people than to be decided by a handful of editors-in-chief of newspapers. The biggest point of manipulation that occurs in the media is not when the media says something that's false or misleading – because they do that – but their choice of narrative, what are they going to talk about. By choosing to focus on one thing and not focus on another thing, they're steering what information the public receives. I think the right thing is that the narratives that are important should be the narratives that the people as a whole think are important, not what a few media oligarchs think is important. But they sure like controlling information.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

25,147 次观看 • 11 个月前

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

Sequoia's Ravi Gupta and Pat Grady on potential layoffs and why the AI doomers are wrong: "Technology is neither good nor bad, it's what we do with it. The same technology that powers a nuclear bomb can power a nuclear power plant." "A lot of what people are doing when they go and talk about the technology is they talk about all the things that might happen. I would rather us talk about the fact that it's going to get more and more powerful, and it's more and more incumbent on all of us to make sure we use it for something great." "If I could give my kids one thing, it wouldn't be kindness. It wouldn't be curiosity. It would be agency. The technology is going to be what all of us make of it."

TBPN

21,055 次观看 • 7 个月前

Calling everyone who opposes Israel’s war “antisemitic” has become one of the tricks in American politics. It makes no sense — plenty of Jewish people are defending Palestinian rights and getting called antisemites for it. I believe people should be judged by the content of their character — not by religion, race or identity. And if someone says that murder and war are wrong, they must have the right to say so. Watch FULL here:

Calling everyone who opposes Israel’s war “antisemitic” has become one of the tricks in American politics. It makes no sense — plenty of Jewish people are defending Palestinian rights and getting called antisemites for it. I believe people should be judged by the content of their character — not by religion, race or identity. And if someone says that murder and war are wrong, they must have the right to say so. Watch FULL here:

Rick Sanchez

12,697 次观看 • 19 天前

Trump just released a bizarre statement. Not sure if it makes much sense. "Many say, don't punch down when talking about people like Chris Sununu or sloppy Chris Christie or Ada Hutchinson. I call him Ada, not Asa, because of certain reasons or others, but sometimes it's necessary to talk badly about those that for no reason other than politics speak badly about you. Otherwise, the people that love you don't know whether or not they're for real. Are they saying the truth or not? So sometimes you have to punch down and you have to say what's happening. Otherwise, they won't understand. It's not fair to them. You have to put them in proper perspective. These bad people, you have to put them in their place. People like this are very destructive, and you have to tell the voters what it's all about. Otherwise, why should they be able to understand it? Thank you very much."

Trump just released a bizarre statement. Not sure if it makes much sense. "Many say, don't punch down when talking about people like Chris Sununu or sloppy Chris Christie or Ada Hutchinson. I call him Ada, not Asa, because of certain reasons or others, but sometimes it's necessary to talk badly about those that for no reason other than politics speak badly about you. Otherwise, the people that love you don't know whether or not they're for real. Are they saying the truth or not? So sometimes you have to punch down and you have to say what's happening. Otherwise, they won't understand. It's not fair to them. You have to put them in proper perspective. These bad people, you have to put them in their place. People like this are very destructive, and you have to tell the voters what it's all about. Otherwise, why should they be able to understand it? Thank you very much."

Ian Miles Cheong

2,028,482 次观看 • 3 年前

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

ELON: THE PEOPLE SHOULD DECIDE WHAT'S IMPORTANT, NOT A HANDFUL OF EDITORS "I don't think there should be a gatekeeping function by a small number of individuals. For newspapers in America, there are about five editors that decide what gets put on the front page, or what to focus on, or what not to focus on. And most of the other papers just copy them, essentially. But is that really what we want? Do we want a handful of people deciding what they think is important? Or should it be the people who decide what's important? And I think it should be sort of an organic thing, where the people decide what's important and what to focus on, not just a handful of editors. They don't like the fact that this power has been taken away from them. But I think it should be." Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

12,668,082 次观看 • 1 年前

Todd Monken took accountability, and the high road, when asked about John Harbaugh's criticism of his playcalling and offensive approach against the Chiefs: "There's not one thing John said that we didn't already talk about. Not one thing. So, there was nothing about it that I hadn't already heard or that he didn't already feel. "One thing I've done throughout my career is that you've got to look at what you do ... "When it's below the line, you have to own it and fix it, and that's what you do. ... You look at it, and you say, 'OK, was that good enough?' The expectation here is to be elite, and we've been elite. We're going to continue to be elite, but I have to do it better." 📽️: FOX Baltimore

Todd Monken took accountability, and the high road, when asked about John Harbaugh's criticism of his playcalling and offensive approach against the Chiefs: "There's not one thing John said that we didn't already talk about. Not one thing. So, there was nothing about it that I hadn't already heard or that he didn't already feel. "One thing I've done throughout my career is that you've got to look at what you do ... "When it's below the line, you have to own it and fix it, and that's what you do. ... You look at it, and you say, 'OK, was that good enough?' The expectation here is to be elite, and we've been elite. We're going to continue to be elite, but I have to do it better." 📽️: FOX Baltimore

Sarah Ellison

73,316 次观看 • 10 个月前

REPORTER: “You've had a deep faith for God and country…. What is your hope for America at a time such as this?” SECRETARY RUBIO: "My hope for America? It's the same as it's always been. I think it's the hope we all share. We want it to continue to be the place where anyone from anywhere can achieve anything — where you're not limited by the circumstances of your birth, the color of your skin, or your ethnicity." “But frankly, it's a place where you are able to overcome challenges and achieve your full potential. I think that should be the goal of every country in the world, frankly. “But I think in the U.S. we're not perfect. Our history is not one of perfection, but it's still better than anybody else's history.” "It is a unique and exceptional country. And as we come upon this 250 year anniversary, I think we have a lot to learn and be proud of in our history. It is one of perpetual and continuous improvement, where each generation has done its part to bring us closer to fulfilling the vision that the founders of this country had upon its founding."

REPORTER: “You've had a deep faith for God and country…. What is your hope for America at a time such as this?” SECRETARY RUBIO: "My hope for America? It's the same as it's always been. I think it's the hope we all share. We want it to continue to be the place where anyone from anywhere can achieve anything — where you're not limited by the circumstances of your birth, the color of your skin, or your ethnicity." “But frankly, it's a place where you are able to overcome challenges and achieve your full potential. I think that should be the goal of every country in the world, frankly. “But I think in the U.S. we're not perfect. Our history is not one of perfection, but it's still better than anybody else's history.” "It is a unique and exceptional country. And as we come upon this 250 year anniversary, I think we have a lot to learn and be proud of in our history. It is one of perpetual and continuous improvement, where each generation has done its part to bring us closer to fulfilling the vision that the founders of this country had upon its founding."

Fox News

336,016 次观看 • 3 个月前

Willie D, a rapper and YouTuber, tells his 1.15 million subscribers: "It should be illegal for a person of any color to be on trial fighting a murder case and not have at least one or two or three people that look like them from their ethnicity judging them." "It would be very disingenuous for us to make a statement that, 'Yo, we can do this. We can be -- I do believe that a jury, all-white jury can judge fairly somebody who's not white.' No, they can't. No, they can't. You might find one. It's a needle in the haystack."

Willie D, a rapper and YouTuber, tells his 1.15 million subscribers: "It should be illegal for a person of any color to be on trial fighting a murder case and not have at least one or two or three people that look like them from their ethnicity judging them." "It would be very disingenuous for us to make a statement that, 'Yo, we can do this. We can be -- I do believe that a jury, all-white jury can judge fairly somebody who's not white.' No, they can't. No, they can't. You might find one. It's a needle in the haystack."

Breitbart News

131,176 次观看 • 1 个月前