Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The foundation has already been built adding features is pretty EZ Earlier this year Diggles shared some insight into NASA joining National DigiFoundry🔍 Kevin L. Jackson asked the team if the Network could do something that was a requirement by NASA. Dr. James Aman -Constellation Network protocol engineer said... show more

Dagnum P.I.

32,459 subscribers

242,982 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

ParadiseDBTR1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson The speculation around @Conste11ation is gone... everything has been validated. Now it is just a question of how deep & fast the adoption will be. $DAG

Dagnum P.I.1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson @Conste11ation How awkward is it going to be for coinbase or Kraken when US Treasury Department has a token on PACASWAP

hgtp://arockoholic1 year ago

🤩 they sure are dropping the ball @coinbase @cryptocom @krakenfx $DAG 🐙 The Real Kraken, uprooting its image back to the deserving. 💝

hgtp://Mr. Charles1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson It's insane that there isn't more traction with CEXs right now! The proof has been shown in multiple ways...

Dagnum P.I.1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson We need to understand why these CEX refuse to list.

(((⚫️)))HGTP://Levi.dag1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson Remember a year ago when you were telling people to pay attention to the NDF? Props to everyone who did! @UTSADigiFoundry are blazing trails of American DLT adoption.

H Crypto1 year ago

@Kevin_Jackson I think the question is why @Conste11ation doesn't want to be listed? Everything you need for a listing is in the basket.

Ｖ1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson 🤍🙏✨

HGTP://SNAFU1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson Don't do it! Don't be left behind! Get on the train! @coinbase @krakenfx @cryptocom

HGTP://BlackStar1 year ago

@NASA @Kevin_Jackson Dag come into many ways to demonstrate DLT posibilites $DAG 🇺🇲

Related Videos

Shout-out to CryptosRus for covering $DAG Yes $DAG is working with the Govt Yes $DAG is ISO compliant Also worth mentioning it's the only blockchain in that list that's approved for blockchain applications at a federal level. National Science Foundation, United States Department of Treasury and the United States Space Force publicly stated on November 19th utilizing this technology for data Exchange with universities, Healthcare data, space data and yes cross border payments. Also worth mentioning now they're partnered with United Nations which was announced by Kevin L. Jackson From National DigiFoundry Not sure what else Coinbase 🛡️ is looking for? Having $NDT would seem like a great opportunity for coinbase earn program?

Shout-out to CryptosRus for covering $DAG Yes $DAG is working with the Govt Yes $DAG is ISO compliant Also worth mentioning it's the only blockchain in that list that's approved for blockchain applications at a federal level. National Science Foundation, United States Department of Treasury and the United States Space Force publicly stated on November 19th utilizing this technology for data Exchange with universities, Healthcare data, space data and yes cross border payments. Also worth mentioning now they're partnered with United Nations which was announced by Kevin L. Jackson From National DigiFoundry Not sure what else Coinbase 🛡️ is looking for? Having $NDT would seem like a great opportunity for coinbase earn program?

Dagnum P.I.

17,182 views • 1 year ago

I'm sorry to report that Alasdair Whitney of the Institute of Justice has taken a shameful position on Flock cameras, and at a critical moment. He argues that the cameras and network can stay up and collect all the data they collect today, as long as the government agrees that accessing the data requires a warrant. We already know that this government will spy on us in secret and without a warrant when a warrant is required by law. Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the NSA, which was doing just this. This was the one time the government was caught; how many other instances are there of the government illegally spying on us that we don't know about? And they persecute Edward Snowden for telling us this truth to this day. Does that sound like a government that has changed its ways? And we're supposed to trust this government with a warrant requirement? Alasdair Whitney didn't even ask or suggest that we should have some oversight over how the data is stored and collected. It's sitting in a cloud held by a private company that can do whatever it wants with it. There are no protections at all! And we're supposed to let this government, which spies on us in violation of the Constitution, have in place a surveillance network of control and subjugation nearly identical to those used by authoritarian regimes like North Korea and China? Shame on the Institute for Justice for being so weak at a time when we need strong voices the most.

I'm sorry to report that Alasdair Whitney of the Institute of Justice has taken a shameful position on Flock cameras, and at a critical moment. He argues that the cameras and network can stay up and collect all the data they collect today, as long as the government agrees that accessing the data requires a warrant. We already know that this government will spy on us in secret and without a warrant when a warrant is required by law. Edward Snowden blew the whistle on the NSA, which was doing just this. This was the one time the government was caught; how many other instances are there of the government illegally spying on us that we don't know about? And they persecute Edward Snowden for telling us this truth to this day. Does that sound like a government that has changed its ways? And we're supposed to trust this government with a warrant requirement? Alasdair Whitney didn't even ask or suggest that we should have some oversight over how the data is stored and collected. It's sitting in a cloud held by a private company that can do whatever it wants with it. There are no protections at all! And we're supposed to let this government, which spies on us in violation of the Constitution, have in place a surveillance network of control and subjugation nearly identical to those used by authoritarian regimes like North Korea and China? Shame on the Institute for Justice for being so weak at a time when we need strong voices the most.

Orwell Day

54,961 views • 12 days ago

Ossoff: I think we have to step back and recognize that this entire war is based on lies. They told us last year that the Iranian nuclear threat was obliterated. Then they told us earlier this year that there was an imminent nuclear threat. On day four of this war, President Trump declared victory. Months ago, Hegseth said that all of our objectives had been achieved. The war continues. Iran still has its uranium. Hormuz remains closed. This is a complete fiasco. It is a catastrophic failure by the commander in chief personally and his entire national security team.

Ossoff: I think we have to step back and recognize that this entire war is based on lies. They told us last year that the Iranian nuclear threat was obliterated. Then they told us earlier this year that there was an imminent nuclear threat. On day four of this war, President Trump declared victory. Months ago, Hegseth said that all of our objectives had been achieved. The war continues. Iran still has its uranium. Hormuz remains closed. This is a complete fiasco. It is a catastrophic failure by the commander in chief personally and his entire national security team.

Acyn

171,075 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk on how he initially got into space: “I didn't understand why NASA had nothing about people going to Mars.” “The space stuff actually came from a conversation Adeo [Ressi] and I had. Adeo asked me, what am I doing after PayPal? I said I thought maybe there'd be something philanthropic that could be done in space that would get the public more excited about space travel, in particular sending people to Mars. I said, I'm sure NASA's got that covered. So, I'll go look on the NASA website for when are we going to Mars? Because, of course, it should be on the website: We're going to Mars in this year, and this is how we're going to do it. But there was nothing. Nothing at all about people going to Mars. I was like, I just don't understand why there's nothing about people going to Mars. Because if you look at the literature in the 1970s, it was all about, we went to the moon, now we're going to go to Mars. And so, what happened? There was the Space Shuttle, and the Space Shuttle turned out to be a really big mistake. It could barely get to Low Earth Orbit. Forget about the moon or Mars or anything like that. So, I thought, maybe I can do something that's going to get the public excited about Mars, and that will generate congressional support, which will turn into funding for NASA to go do this.” Churchill Club, April 7, 2009

Elon Musk on how he initially got into space: “I didn't understand why NASA had nothing about people going to Mars.” “The space stuff actually came from a conversation Adeo [Ressi] and I had. Adeo asked me, what am I doing after PayPal? I said I thought maybe there'd be something philanthropic that could be done in space that would get the public more excited about space travel, in particular sending people to Mars. I said, I'm sure NASA's got that covered. So, I'll go look on the NASA website for when are we going to Mars? Because, of course, it should be on the website: We're going to Mars in this year, and this is how we're going to do it. But there was nothing. Nothing at all about people going to Mars. I was like, I just don't understand why there's nothing about people going to Mars. Because if you look at the literature in the 1970s, it was all about, we went to the moon, now we're going to go to Mars. And so, what happened? There was the Space Shuttle, and the Space Shuttle turned out to be a really big mistake. It could barely get to Low Earth Orbit. Forget about the moon or Mars or anything like that. So, I thought, maybe I can do something that's going to get the public excited about Mars, and that will generate congressional support, which will turn into funding for NASA to go do this.” Churchill Club, April 7, 2009

ELON CLIPS

1,635,798 views • 1 year ago

Could $ICP & $DAG Power the Future of X? DFINITY Foundation was proposed as a decentralized infrastructure solution for X, offering dedicated subnets, enhanced security and on-chain X token integration Combined with Starlink’s satellite internet, this setup aimed to create a scalable, censorship-resistant, and globally accessible platform. Internet Computer is now a cloud service provider (CSP) for National DigiFoundry (NDF) NDF’s Space Working Group (SWG)—built on Constellation Network Hypergraph (HGTP)—is already proving how blockchain can power secure, AI-driven applications for NASA, the Space Force, and the commercial space industry In the audio clip, Kevin Jackson from the National DigiFoundry describes how they will be securing data for the Space Development Agency for all low-Earth orbit satellites If NDF is already deploying decentralized cloud infrastructure, why shouldn’t X leverage the same battle-tested frameworks for: ✅ On-Chain X Tokens → Feeless payments, tips & rewards ✅ Censorship-Resistant Hosting → Subnets & HGTP for tamper-proof data storage ✅ AI Model Integrity → Secure moderation & algorithmic transparency ✅ Starlink-Powered Transactions → Seamless payments & data access without banking roadblocks X has a choice: follow legacy models or lead the Web3 revolution

Sensitive content

Could $ICP & $DAG Power the Future of X? DFINITY Foundation was proposed as a decentralized infrastructure solution for X, offering dedicated subnets, enhanced security and on-chain X token integration Combined with Starlink’s satellite internet, this setup aimed to create a scalable, censorship-resistant, and globally accessible platform. Internet Computer is now a cloud service provider (CSP) for National DigiFoundry (NDF) NDF’s Space Working Group (SWG)—built on Constellation Network Hypergraph (HGTP)—is already proving how blockchain can power secure, AI-driven applications for NASA, the Space Force, and the commercial space industry In the audio clip, Kevin Jackson from the National DigiFoundry describes how they will be securing data for the Space Development Agency for all low-Earth orbit satellites If NDF is already deploying decentralized cloud infrastructure, why shouldn’t X leverage the same battle-tested frameworks for: ✅ On-Chain X Tokens → Feeless payments, tips & rewards ✅ Censorship-Resistant Hosting → Subnets & HGTP for tamper-proof data storage ✅ AI Model Integrity → Secure moderation & algorithmic transparency ✅ Starlink-Powered Transactions → Seamless payments & data access without banking roadblocks X has a choice: follow legacy models or lead the Web3 revolution

Dagnum P.I.

32,431 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NASA IS LIGHTING FIRES ON THE MOON — WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY HIDING UP THERE? This is becoming increasingly strange. While NASA and private companies push forward with new lunar missions, many are asking a serious question: Why are they conducting what appear to be fire or energy experiments on the moon? Some see it as nothing more than a massive money grab. Others like David Icke believe something far deeper is going on. That the moon may not be natural at all. That it was brought here, could be hollow, and is being used as a massive sensor or control system for humanity. The moon has long been surrounded by anomalies that defy conventional explanation. The official narrative has more holes than it has answers. And many of the public faces of these missions look and feel more like actors than explorers. Why the hell is NASA lighting fires on the moon, and what are they really using it for?

🚨 NASA IS LIGHTING FIRES ON THE MOON — WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY HIDING UP THERE? This is becoming increasingly strange. While NASA and private companies push forward with new lunar missions, many are asking a serious question: Why are they conducting what appear to be fire or energy experiments on the moon? Some see it as nothing more than a massive money grab. Others like David Icke believe something far deeper is going on. That the moon may not be natural at all. That it was brought here, could be hollow, and is being used as a massive sensor or control system for humanity. The moon has long been surrounded by anomalies that defy conventional explanation. The official narrative has more holes than it has answers. And many of the public faces of these missions look and feel more like actors than explorers. Why the hell is NASA lighting fires on the moon, and what are they really using it for?

HustleBitch

21,375 views • 2 months ago

.James Talarico: Our first step was to request this public information, and Ken Paxton just got back to us with a denial. And so our first plan of action has been rejected by the Attorney General. And I think raising that for Texans so that they know that the Attorney General is hiding this information, that's key. My hope is that we can build enough bipartisan support that can pressure the Attorney General to do the right thing and release all information about this case so we can get our questions answered and then we can talk about some other issues that are of importance to Texans.

.James Talarico: Our first step was to request this public information, and Ken Paxton just got back to us with a denial. And so our first plan of action has been rejected by the Attorney General. And I think raising that for Texans so that they know that the Attorney General is hiding this information, that's key. My hope is that we can build enough bipartisan support that can pressure the Attorney General to do the right thing and release all information about this case so we can get our questions answered and then we can talk about some other issues that are of importance to Texans.

Team Talarico

59,196 views • 2 months ago

Realism over renders - NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. Full interview available in a few hours. "Everything we do at NASA is pretty ambitious, right? I mean, it should be, we're NASA on that. "But we could have put this like, you know, wild 3D rendering of the glass dome on the Moon with plants in it and a Ferris wheel and kids having fun or something and be like, 'okay, that looks pretty wild' and never would happen, right? Like, we're actually trying to do pretty challenging things. "But in a logical, iterative way, a phased approach to getting to the outcomes that we want to see. That's why, like phase one, I've described to people, hey, the Moon might look like a junkyard. There could be a lot of broken down rovers and landers somewhere, you know, all around the south pole of the Moon. "But you know what? We're learning."

Realism over renders - NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. Full interview available in a few hours. "Everything we do at NASA is pretty ambitious, right? I mean, it should be, we're NASA on that. "But we could have put this like, you know, wild 3D rendering of the glass dome on the Moon with plants in it and a Ferris wheel and kids having fun or something and be like, 'okay, that looks pretty wild' and never would happen, right? Like, we're actually trying to do pretty challenging things. "But in a logical, iterative way, a phased approach to getting to the outcomes that we want to see. That's why, like phase one, I've described to people, hey, the Moon might look like a junkyard. There could be a lot of broken down rovers and landers somewhere, you know, all around the south pole of the Moon. "But you know what? We're learning."

NSF - NASASpaceflight.com

28,963 views • 6 months ago

#WATCH | Thiruvananthapuram | On ISRO successfully performing docking of satellites as part of SpaDeX Mission, former ISRO Scientist and Padma Bhushan Nambi Narayanan says, "My reaction is happiness. It is something we all have been dreaming of for years. It is something which has been achieved by only three nations- China, the US and Russia- and now we are the fourth nation to do this. It was a pre-requirement for future missions of ISRO and Gaganyaan mission. In every future mission, we will need to do docking for outer space missions."

#WATCH | Thiruvananthapuram | On ISRO successfully performing docking of satellites as part of SpaDeX Mission, former ISRO Scientist and Padma Bhushan Nambi Narayanan says, "My reaction is happiness. It is something we all have been dreaming of for years. It is something which has been achieved by only three nations- China, the US and Russia- and now we are the fourth nation to do this. It was a pre-requirement for future missions of ISRO and Gaganyaan mission. In every future mission, we will need to do docking for outer space missions."

ANI

97,262 views • 1 year ago

🚨BREAKING🚨: NASA is deliberately erasing UFOs and other anomalies from the photo record of the Apollo Moon Program. On the far side of the moon, something that looks like a buried nuclear reactor is radiating at twenty times the normal heat with concentrations of thorium and uranium NASA can't explain. And on the surface sit formations that resemble ancient ruins, too geometrically precise to have formed naturally, above caverns far more vast than the entirety of Manhattan. Theoretical physicist Maaneli Derakhshani (Maaneli (Max) Derakhshani) , a Utrecht PhD working on lunar anomalies, discovered that NASA holds two versions of the same Apollo 14 photograph: in one, a blue orb hangs in the sky above astronaut Ed Mitchell, and in the other it has been redacted out. He has found the same across other Apollo missions, and Ken Johnston Sr., a former NASA consultant and pilot who worked with the astronauts, says he was ordered to destroy early negatives showing things that weren't supposed to be there. The Department of War is now investigating an Apollo 17 frame Derakhshani had flagged a year earlier, in which three lights above the lunar surface appear to be a single physical object. NASA was built to keep this all quiet. Its founding charter placed it under the Pentagon and gave it legal cover to hide anything touching national security from Congress and the public, and a report it commissioned soon after spelled out the plan directly: if artifacts ever turned up on the Moon, bury the discovery. Trump has now gone further and designated NASA an intelligence agency outright. The men who walked there have hinted at what they saw, objects trailing their craft, lights that weren't debris, even a telepathic warning to stay away that came just before the missions stopped for good. In 1994 NASA and the Pentagon ran a joint mission to the Moon called Clementine, sold to the public as a survey of lunar minerals. Its own deputy manager says on the record it was a reconnaissance operation, sent to photograph the far side and find out who was building bases up there. The moon is not what we think it is. Full conversation live now.

🚨BREAKING🚨: NASA is deliberately erasing UFOs and other anomalies from the photo record of the Apollo Moon Program. On the far side of the moon, something that looks like a buried nuclear reactor is radiating at twenty times the normal heat with concentrations of thorium and uranium NASA can't explain. And on the surface sit formations that resemble ancient ruins, too geometrically precise to have formed naturally, above caverns far more vast than the entirety of Manhattan. Theoretical physicist Maaneli Derakhshani (Maaneli (Max) Derakhshani) , a Utrecht PhD working on lunar anomalies, discovered that NASA holds two versions of the same Apollo 14 photograph: in one, a blue orb hangs in the sky above astronaut Ed Mitchell, and in the other it has been redacted out. He has found the same across other Apollo missions, and Ken Johnston Sr., a former NASA consultant and pilot who worked with the astronauts, says he was ordered to destroy early negatives showing things that weren't supposed to be there. The Department of War is now investigating an Apollo 17 frame Derakhshani had flagged a year earlier, in which three lights above the lunar surface appear to be a single physical object. NASA was built to keep this all quiet. Its founding charter placed it under the Pentagon and gave it legal cover to hide anything touching national security from Congress and the public, and a report it commissioned soon after spelled out the plan directly: if artifacts ever turned up on the Moon, bury the discovery. Trump has now gone further and designated NASA an intelligence agency outright. The men who walked there have hinted at what they saw, objects trailing their craft, lights that weren't debris, even a telepathic warning to stay away that came just before the missions stopped for good. In 1994 NASA and the Pentagon ran a joint mission to the Moon called Clementine, sold to the public as a survey of lunar minerals. Its own deputy manager says on the record it was a reconnaissance operation, sent to photograph the far side and find out who was building bases up there. The moon is not what we think it is. Full conversation live now.

Jesse Michels

179,161 views • 2 months ago

Jesse Michels: “Do you think NASA has other propulsion methods?” Chris Bledsoe: “I think they’ve had it a long time.” “I know they were working on back-engineering UFOs a long time ago.” Michels: “Are the UFOs alien reproduction vehicles that … go into space?” “Or are they like-voltage chambers that are like portals, like in the movie Contact where you end up in some other dimensional?” Bledsoe: “I think probably both exist. I don’t know.” Michels: “And you think NASA is sitting on this stuff?” Bledsoe: “I don’t know that NASA is necessarily, but there are satellite groups that keep it under wraps.” “According to Tim [Taylor], there were two Air Force generals at the Pentagon that knew everything.” Michels: “Which generals?” Bledsoe: “He didn’t tell me.” “When you go to NASA mission control … it’s a square building with a long hallway in the middle.” “When you walk down this hallway, it’s glass on both sides.” “You look to the right, it’s all NASA scientists at their consoles.” “And you look to the left, it’s exactly the same, but it’s all Air Force people.” “And Tim’s in the middle of all of it.” Chris Bledsoe Jesse Michels

Jesse Michels: “Do you think NASA has other propulsion methods?” Chris Bledsoe: “I think they’ve had it a long time.” “I know they were working on back-engineering UFOs a long time ago.” Michels: “Are the UFOs alien reproduction vehicles that … go into space?” “Or are they like-voltage chambers that are like portals, like in the movie Contact where you end up in some other dimensional?” Bledsoe: “I think probably both exist. I don’t know.” Michels: “And you think NASA is sitting on this stuff?” Bledsoe: “I don’t know that NASA is necessarily, but there are satellite groups that keep it under wraps.” “According to Tim [Taylor], there were two Air Force generals at the Pentagon that knew everything.” Michels: “Which generals?” Bledsoe: “He didn’t tell me.” “When you go to NASA mission control … it’s a square building with a long hallway in the middle.” “When you walk down this hallway, it’s glass on both sides.” “You look to the right, it’s all NASA scientists at their consoles.” “And you look to the left, it’s exactly the same, but it’s all Air Force people.” “And Tim’s in the middle of all of it.” Chris Bledsoe Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

42,795 views • 8 months ago

In light of the names Anneke Lucas mentioned, like the former Canadian prime minister who is dead now, but is the father of the current one. It is being shared all over the internet now. Canadian accounts are posting this, and it is getting lots of attention. This is also a wake-up call for Canada. A lot of people in Canada are commenting on social media that they are shocked by this guy being named. But actually he was already mentioned by Cathy O'Brien in 1995, as being involved in these networks! See the video below. So there is corroboration between these witnesses. A lot of these former and now deceased prime ministers she mentions were, at that time that she was in it in the 70s, involved in this. Also the Belgian one that Anneke names, and was also named by other witnesses. Which tells us, like these witnesses say, this was a global network. So the truth was already out there a bit, but it is coming out more for a bigger public. We will have more revelations coming out in 2025 about these dark dealing that have been going on at the highest levels, I'm sure. This is going to be a shock for a lot of people that are new to this information, because it is reaching a bigger public. Some will choose not to believe it, do no research, and look no further. But a lot more people will wake up to this, it is unstoppable. Of course, we have to check in with our own vibration. If it gets too heavy, take some time out and go for a walk in nature. Whilst revelations are important for the truth to come out, and confronting hard information is part of that, we have to check with our selves how this information is affecting us, and sometimes we need a time off. It is always most important to maintain a healthy balance between checking in with this information and our own peace of mind. #Epstein #PBDpodcast

In light of the names Anneke Lucas mentioned, like the former Canadian prime minister who is dead now, but is the father of the current one. It is being shared all over the internet now. Canadian accounts are posting this, and it is getting lots of attention. This is also a wake-up call for Canada. A lot of people in Canada are commenting on social media that they are shocked by this guy being named. But actually he was already mentioned by Cathy O'Brien in 1995, as being involved in these networks! See the video below. So there is corroboration between these witnesses. A lot of these former and now deceased prime ministers she mentions were, at that time that she was in it in the 70s, involved in this. Also the Belgian one that Anneke names, and was also named by other witnesses. Which tells us, like these witnesses say, this was a global network. So the truth was already out there a bit, but it is coming out more for a bigger public. We will have more revelations coming out in 2025 about these dark dealing that have been going on at the highest levels, I'm sure. This is going to be a shock for a lot of people that are new to this information, because it is reaching a bigger public. Some will choose not to believe it, do no research, and look no further. But a lot more people will wake up to this, it is unstoppable. Of course, we have to check in with our own vibration. If it gets too heavy, take some time out and go for a walk in nature. Whilst revelations are important for the truth to come out, and confronting hard information is part of that, we have to check with our selves how this information is affecting us, and sometimes we need a time off. It is always most important to maintain a healthy balance between checking in with this information and our own peace of mind. #Epstein #PBDpodcast

Jens Patteeuw

20,426 views • 1 year ago

David Stearns was asked about the Mets taking time to form their team identity with so many new players this season: "I think there are adjustment periods, I think that's natural. I think specifically in New York, there are adjustment periods. We've seen that time and again... My sense is our team has jelled pretty well. I think it was a focus in spring training. I think guys spent a lot of time together in spring training." Part of being a good team over a 6-7 month stretch is finding your identity through adversity. We're facing adversity right now certainly at an earlier stage than any of us expected or wanted, but this has an opportunity to be part of our story - help us find our identity, come through this and understand we have the ability to do that. Based on the guys we have and the quality of work and the quality of people, I believe we will be able to do that."

David Stearns was asked about the Mets taking time to form their team identity with so many new players this season: "I think there are adjustment periods, I think that's natural. I think specifically in New York, there are adjustment periods. We've seen that time and again... My sense is our team has jelled pretty well. I think it was a focus in spring training. I think guys spent a lot of time together in spring training." Part of being a good team over a 6-7 month stretch is finding your identity through adversity. We're facing adversity right now certainly at an earlier stage than any of us expected or wanted, but this has an opportunity to be part of our story - help us find our identity, come through this and understand we have the ability to do that. Based on the guys we have and the quality of work and the quality of people, I believe we will be able to do that."

SNY Mets

35,946 views • 5 months ago

This is NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman take on the recent UAP disclosures. "My position on this is that, look I don't want to comment as to the the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say this is really insightful and some of it I say is that that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was a an Iranian one-way attack drone or something. I will tell you I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge, I can take a lie detector test, on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this, but for sure we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts."

This is NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman take on the recent UAP disclosures. "My position on this is that, look I don't want to comment as to the the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say this is really insightful and some of it I say is that that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was a an Iranian one-way attack drone or something. I will tell you I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge, I can take a lie detector test, on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this, but for sure we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts."

Peter H. Diamandis, MD

17,079 views • 2 months ago