正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The O Level was never designed as a universal school-leaving qualification. In Britain, where it originated, it was intended for roughly the top 20% of pupils on the academic grammar school track. The remaining 80% followed vocational and technical pathways. Yet Zimbabwe persists with the fiction that every child...

71,900 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

40 条评论

oscar 的头像
oscar2 个月前

Agree on early technical skills adoption, but O-Level is critical for reasoning & further training. UK’s GCSE equiv has a ~65% pass rate; ours is just 33%. The gap isn’t student ability—it’s chronic underfunding and lack of resources. We must boost investment, not lower the bar.

Tinashe 的头像
Tinashe2 个月前

The important point is that GCSEs are not an absolute requirement for employment. Someone can leave school at 16 without GCSE passes and enter an apprenticeship or an entry-level job

Starchild 的头像
Starchild2 个月前

In this era we can't be talking smalll scale carpenters and welders where there is no standardisation. We need to create large scale regulated and standardised manufacturing which absorbs labour with or without O levels. People generally need sustainable jobs with real pension. These mshika-shika ideas won't help

El Paso 的头像
El Paso2 个月前

I totally disagree with due respect. We actually need to raise our O Level back to the 1980s standard at the minimum. What seems to be it's irrelevance today is the decline of quality and educational standards. Zimbabweans running corporations around the world are the product of a superior O level education as a basic standard. The model worked very well. It is not the reason for the mediocrity we see in our country today. We need well educated people. Vocational opportunities should be made accessible to those who can't make it academically.

James Chikonamombe 的头像
James Chikonamombe2 个月前

I would even add: basic numeracy & literacy (in the vernacular, if needed) are much more important than "5 O'Levels".

mayida innocent 的头像
mayida innocent2 个月前

Interesting discussions, but stats says different most people at collegesin Zim are rural students. Even at work places most are from rural areas even those in diaspora 😂🤣🤣🤣

Jonah (Jay) Chikukwa 的头像
Jonah (Jay) Chikukwa2 个月前

I totally agree with you @baba_nyenyedzi. I live in RSA where majority of Zimbos who crossed the border dominate as self employed plumbers, electricians, builders, domestic workers and hospitality. As a country we must have focused in becoming the best in Africa for these fields.

Persevere_D🇿🇼 的头像
Persevere_D🇿🇼2 个月前

I have a different question does Zimbabwe currently have a shortage of labour due to the education system. What I see is lack of jobs and industry to absorb that we have. People are still getting technical skills but the schools a full. What we need is a revamp of tertiary..

Nigel Philp 的头像
Nigel Philp2 个月前

Education should be re written for today’s age

Billy Chinoto 的头像
Billy Chinoto2 个月前

Why are you obsessed with passing 5 Olevels? Vocational collages in Zimbabwe do not require 5 Olevels!

Dr. Nhlanhla Dube (PhD) 的头像
Dr. Nhlanhla Dube (PhD)2 个月前

Nothing good ever came from limiting access to education.We are entering the 4th industrial revolution which will be knowledge based. You are only as good as what you know. Societies that embrace education for all ensure access to social mobility and economic progression to all.

🤲HandsOffOurConstitution🇿🇼 的头像
🤲HandsOffOurConstitution🇿🇼2 个月前

I personally don't have a problem with O'level, it must remain as a foundation for every Zimbabwean citizen. But perhaps schools need to be sensitive to student abilities early on, when they transition from J.C to O'level, and group them according to their abilities.

IceMan🥶 的头像
IceMan🥶2 个月前

What happens under the China and India systems for those students who fail O Levels, vocational and technical skills? I'm just curious

Tinashe 的头像
Tinashe2 个月前

50% go into academic route and 50% vocational and technical skills. The streaming is early on

Dominictb1983 的头像
Dominictb19832 个月前

@LoveMasiya Tinashe there is an element you seem not to grasp. What made China great or be the industrial hub of the world is never all you are talking about. It's the mindset. What aggregates all is the mindset than school get this baba and you understand all. It's the mindset,stup!d

Tinashe 的头像
Tinashe2 个月前

@LoveMasiya But not everyone is supposed to think.

Dominictb1983 的头像
Dominictb19832 个月前

@LoveMasiya What about those who are supposed to think are they thinking??🤣🤣

Tinashe 的头像
Tinashe2 个月前

@LoveMasiya lol. At least we can count you as one 😅

Qhubekani Angelmore Mpofu 的头像
Qhubekani Angelmore Mpofu2 个月前

School work must focus on wat the child can do best from their primary level but here u get time choose when u finish O'level. Wy should my career be determined by a 2hrs 30 min exam? Everychild must get education based on their skills. One must learn till able to create a job

Jorum Nare Marupi 的头像
Jorum Nare Marupi2 个月前

@MakoniMuchira Parents also need to open their eyes, this idea of forcing children who are failing to repeat numerous times sounds off. Face value it appears to have a bearing on the self confidence of the child

@nets23 的头像
@nets232 个月前

True..especially agriculture and mining should begin at primary level..chinese and japanese they teach at young age about technology

Tanganda 的头像
Tanganda2 个月前

NO,not at all.We need as a nation,to have at least a minimum level of education where we agree that after that level,every students will and can be said to be educated.we cant allow any province or district have it's own systems,a NATIONAL grading/level system is important.

Chau 的头像
Chau2 个月前

Your inclination is flawed. On the job skilling is only where jobs are present not where they are not. It's the economy, stupid! Vocational training is open to anyone in Zim but placements are absent. SA has so much placement potential than Zim.

Dexter Munthali 的头像
Dexter Munthali2 个月前

O Levels should remain an academic pathway, not the only pathway. Zimbabwe needs respected vocational and technical routes linked to each province's industries. Real success is creating skilled, employable young people—not forcing every learner through the same exam.

Madiba1 的头像
Madiba12 个月前

Why use Britain as an example yet nearer home Smith did it. We called it bottle neck Smith called it skilling the academic poor. He had many polytechnics and vocational training centers that is why Simon Muzenda majored in carpentry.

Ungwe 的头像
Ungwe2 个月前

May I respectfully submit that in this modern age going towards AI, this is misplaced. Unskilled workers will be redundant. AI is going to replace a lot of low end and even medium & high end tasks. Just an aside, are you sure in Britain it’s only the 20% still pursuing O’level?

simon chingora 的头像
simon chingora2 个月前

Zimbabwe must stop treating academic passes as the only measure of ability and vocational education as a route for “failures.” But vocationalisation without industrialisation creates skills for jobs that do not exist. We need respected pathways linked to aptitude and industry.

Changunda 的头像
Changunda2 个月前

@sharonmufaro What’s the German model? What made them successful at running small businesses?

Wilbert Garaba 的头像
Wilbert Garaba2 个月前

True. That is why I think it was a grave mistake to disband the pre-independence F2 Schools where those unable to proceed with academic education were absorbed for basic technical education.

John Smith 的头像
John Smith2 个月前

Education is about being versatile in an ever changing world 🌎. Being educated helps you to appreciate what others do and what you in turn can do to contribute to the chain of value that humanity creates . Understanding of world subjects and issues makes us more rounded people

Mufudzi 的头像
Mufudzi2 个月前

Zimbabweans and a lot of South Africans ridicule SA 30% passs. Its logic is those who want to go to uni must pass with 65 average and above. Then 30% to 65% have options varying from diploma, NC certificates and general jobs However where I disagree is making this about urban and rural schools. Many academics and CEO of the 1980 and 1990 era came from rural schools I have few brilliant people I follow on this app who are much younger than me and are doing well professionally but they came from rural areas/schools Gov should equip schools to same standard as long as its gov school.

Mudhakisi 的头像
Mudhakisi2 个月前

Damn fam. You cooked here. It’s my sincere hope that this message goes loud. It’s sad our governance spends more time in power struggle than simple visions which can be achieved in a few years…

Lameck Musopero 的头像
Lameck Musopero2 个月前

I think it was a detour meant meant to alleviate pressure for job demands especially that time when there was no jobs in the country, since it was hit by scathing sanctions. My take.

Mamboloti 的头像
Mamboloti2 个月前

That's a very gud one

TinasheTembo 的头像
TinasheTembo2 个月前

This is a fact. There is need to revamp our education system

yiyo 的头像
yiyo2 个月前

In my opinion this has continued to be so because of few training schools and universities in the country if they make these centres how are they going to accomodate them or the system will simple brea.

Costa Matyavira 的头像
Costa Matyavira2 个月前

On point

Fumai Mufakose : Taurotragus Oryx 的头像
Fumai Mufakose : Taurotragus Oryx2 个月前

This is called Do what you want with your children Don't extend it to our kids - Bullsh&t

Joel Kessels 的头像
Joel Kessels2 个月前

@sharonmufaro Can try different things to find what works, i would copy the Singapore model, it worked for China..

charles gatete 的头像
charles gatete2 个月前

Very important conversation that needs to be had across all African education systems

相关视频

We've just been passed the BBC's response to a complaint after Good Morning Scotland concealed an academic's links to Labour during an interview about the winter fuel payment and a warning from Age Scotland. We've reproduced the complaint and response below. We've also included the full interview. There's something untoward at play here. The complaint: Good Morning Scotland conducted an interview with professor June Andrews. The interview centred around the cut to the winter fuel payment and had been prompted by criticism by Age Scotland of the UK Labour Govt's decision to cut the benefit. The charity had claimed that cutting the benefit would see more old people admitted to hospital with hypothermia. The interview was conducted by Laura Maxwell who introduced the academic as follows "Well Professor June Andrews is an expert in the care of older people." The academic challenged Age Scotland's claims and backed Labour's decision to cut the benefit. Professor Andrews views were later used on the programme to challenge Scottish Govt minister Ivan McKee. The academic was presented as someone with no political allegiances or viewpoints. This was far from the truth. Professor June Andrews is a Labour supporter and party activist who makes no attempt to hide her political allegiance. A quick glance at her social media profile - publicly available at the time of the interview - makes this clear, with post after post promoting tweets from senior Labour party figures. The academic tweeted an image during the recent general election campaign showing her with other Labour party activists as they campaigned for Labour candidate Gregor Poynton. Section 4.3.12 of the BBC Guidelines states 'We should not automatically assume that contributors from other organisations (such as academics, journalists, researchers and representatives of charities and think-tanks) are unbiased. Appropriate information about their affiliations, funding and particular viewpoints should be made available to the audience, when relevant to the context.' Professor June Andrews was far from unbiased. Good Morning Scotland should have told listeners that the academic was a Labour party activist and supporter. In failing to do so the programme breached Section 4.3.12 of the BBC Guidelines. A public apology is merited. The response: We note your comments regarding Good Morning Scotland on 28 October and the interview with Prof June Andrews. As you mention, Prof Andrews was introduced as an “an expert in the care of older people” and was being interviewed for her view in this capacity, following Age Scotland’s claim that the cutting of the universal winter fuel benefit for pensioners will see more old people admitted to hospital with hypothermia. Prof Andrews, given her area of expertise, has been a contributor on a number of occasions to items regarding the care of older people and was again introduced in this context, with a range of views on the subject heard within the wider programme – this included hearing directly from Scottish Government minister Ivan McKee, as you say. While we wouldn’t agree with a suggestion that simply holding any political views was a requisite for such an introduction, given the capacity in which Prof Andrews was invited onto the programme to speak, we would suggest that the conveyance to listeners of any political views that a contributor may hold is not limited to how a guest is introduced; for example, there is the opportunity within the line of questioning and by any political points being scrutinised and challenged – accepting that, in a live interview, in keeping the interview and programme on track, it isn’t always possible to challenge a guest on every point they’ve made and that it may be a subsequent interview or similar piece of our output that provides for other views and points to be put across. We note your call for a public apology but don’t believe it is merited here. We would, however, remind our teams of the merit of identifying and challenging, there and then, political points made during interviews. Thank you again for getting in touch.

MSM Monitor

28,722 次观看 • 1 年前

Texas has now crossed a serious line. Through HB 1605, passed in the last session, championed by TEA Commissioner #MikeMorath, Governor Greg Abbott, Representative Brad Buckley, Senator Brandon Creighton and others on both sides of the asile, the state is explicitly establishing a mandated “canon of literature” for every student K through 12. That word canon matters. Canon is not an academic term. It is a value laden term rooted in authority, belief, and the power to declare what is foundational truth. This is not about teaching students how to read across genres. The state’s own testimony confirms the intent is to create a shared body of works all students are expected to read, understand, and internalize as foundational knowledge. That is a shift away from academic skill development and toward shaping values, beliefs, and behaviors. When the state becomes the arbiter of what is canon, it assumes authority over truth itself. And when that canon begins to include biblical references embedded in a state owned and mandated curriculum, the question must be asked plainly. Is the state now defining its own religious canon? This is not about faith. It is about government power, coercion, and the constitutional danger of the state deciding what our children must believe, rather than what they must learn. The Bible is sacred scripture. It is not a tool of the state. And it should never be filtered, excerpted, reframed, or repackaged by a government agency.

Alice

53,791 次观看 • 7 个月前

IN THE LABOUR PARTY - NO GODFATHERS. - NO COMPROMISES. - ONLY THE PEOPLE MATTER. Barr. Julius Abure, National Chairman of the Labour Party, has drawn a bold line in the sand: Nigeria must break free from recycled politics and criminal godfatherism. The Labour Party is not built on backroom deals, political puppetry, or the influence of moneybags. It is built on ideology, integrity, and the unshakable power of the people. While others talk change, the Labour Party proved it during the 2022 and 2023 general elections. We did not just challenge the system, we shook it. Nigeria’s biggest political cancer is godfatherism, a system that trades competence for obedience, integrity for loyalty, and national progress for personal gain. As Barr. Abure rightly states, godfathers do not raise leaders; they manufacture yes-men, installed to be controlled, manipulated, and used as conduits to loot public resources. The Labour Party has rejected this rot, completely and unapologetically. Here, merit beats money. Character beats connection. The people beat the elite. And history has already recorded it: in the 2023 elections, the Labour Party made the impossible possible. An Okada rider and a bus conductor were both elected into the House of Representatives. That was not luck; that was a revolution at the ballot box. The Labour Party is not for a few; it is for artisans, workers, youths, market women, farmers, the poor, the forgotten, and the fed-up majority who are done with suffering and ready to take back their country. Barr. Julius Abure’s call is loud and clear: Join the Labour Party. Take power back. Let’s make Nigeria work. Because this is not just a party: THIS IS A MOVEMENT. THIS IS THE PEOPLE’S FIGHT. THIS IS THE LABOUR PARTY. By: Hon. Amb. AJU Elumelu-James (Special Adviser to the Labour Party National Chairman, Barrister Julius Abure, on Media and Strategic Communication.)🖊️ LabourPartyNG Hon. Amb. AJU Elumelu AJU Global Media AJU2KOBO

Barr. Julius Abure

12,061 次观看 • 8 个月前

Our country is sitting on top of a very big mess that we must confront as citizens. Our country has never had an O Level pass rate above about 33% in the last 40 years. Forty years of failure. That means roughly 67% or more of learners who sit for O Level examinations fail to obtain five O Levels including English language in a single sitting. That is the society we live in, a society where the majority of those who sit for the most basic secondary school examination fail to meet the minimum benchmark. If that reality does not shock right thinking people, nothing will. Imagine what this attached ZBC report is saying, that ten schools did not produce a single O Level pass. Not even one learner managing five subjects including English. Yet we go around repeating the comforting myth and falsehood that we are highly educated and highly literate. Sadly, the truth is far more uncomfortable. We are not. And this failure is not just about examination statistics. It reflects itself in how we think, how we engage with each other in public discourse, how easily misinformation spreads, how leaders manipulate citizens, how we tolerate mediocrity, and how public resources are looted with little resistance from society. A country where the majority of its young people cannot meet the basic threshold of secondary education is a country sitting on a social, economic and political time bomb. It is profoundly sad, and unless we confront it honestly, it will continue to shape the quality of leadership, governance, and citizenship for generations to come. One of the most discomforting aspects of this crisis is that the very few learners who manage to pass O Level are the ones who proceed to A Level. From that already small group, those who pass A Level and make it to university are even fewer. And what happens to most of them? The moment they graduate and an opportunity presents itself, they leave the country. They go to South Africa, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, or anywhere else that offers them a future. The only ones who tend to remain are those who already come from comfortable families or have nowhere to go or no means to use to leave. What this means in practice is that a large proportion of the people who have managed to succeed academically in our system end up living and working outside the country. The society is therefore left with a shrinking pool of highly trained professionals, researchers, engineers, doctors, and thinkers who could otherwise contribute to rebuilding the country. What does that say about the state of our country, when the very people who have managed to succeed within it feel that their only real future lies somewhere else? Here are the pass rates of other countries that use education systems similar to ours, to show just how badly we have performed. Singapore — 94.2%  Britain (UK) — 97.5% Ghana — 79% Nigeria — 79% Seychelles — 82% Mauritius — 70%

Hopewell Chin’ono

43,442 次观看 • 6 个月前