Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The problem is that conventional Linux distributions are designed for traditional computers/servers. They are not convenient for a multitool like Flipper One, which can be a network router, a radio lab, a desktop computer, or a TV media box all on the same device. What we want to build...

flipper_net's profile picture

Flipper Devices

109,085 subscribers

15,195 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Yorum

Flipper Devices profil fotoğrafı
Flipper Devices1 ay önce

What is Flipper OS? Why we build yet another Linux operating system when there are already so many? Why not use Kali, Debian, Arch? 📝Read in blog post

Claus-Peter de Moura Lima Käpplinger profil fotoğrafı
Claus-Peter de Moura Lima Käpplinger1 ay önce

Why not use nixos?

Thomas Beaudry profil fotoğrafı
Thomas Beaudry1 ay önce

OpenBSD will give you most of that.

Hope profil fotoğrafı
Hope21 gün önce

what is the storage situation like on flipper1?

orangin' around 🇷🇸 profil fotoğrafı
orangin' around 🇷🇸1 ay önce

as a clockworkpi uconsole user really looking forward for your OS!

BlackSniper profil fotoğrafı
BlackSniper1 ay önce

When will Flipper One be available for purchase?

Benzer Videolar

Linux is the most widespread operating system, globally – but how is it built? Few people are better to answer this than Greg Kroah-Hartman (Greg K-H): Greg has been a Linux kernel maintainer for 25 years, and one of the 3 Linux Kernel Foundation Fellows (the other two are Linus Torvalds and Shuah Khan). Greg manages the Linux kernel’s stable releases, and is a maintainer of multiple kernel subsystems. We cover the inner workings of Linux kernel development, exploring everything from how changes get implemented to why its community-driven approach produces such reliable software. Greg shares insights about the kernel's unique trust model and makes a case for why engineers should contribute to open-source projects. Watch or listen: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Brought to you buy: • WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. • Vanta — Automate compliance and simplify security with Vanta. Check out all of our current sponsor and their offerings: ---- One of the most surprising things I learned about Linux: although 4,000 developers contribute to the project from 500 companies per year, and has around 800 kernel maintainers, the project is run with email, git... and that's about it! No dedicated project managers, no regular meetings across the group. It's a truly fascinating and unique model (and only applies to the Linux kernel project: not to Linux distributions.) We go into more detail about this topic with Greg in the podcast as well.
0:59

Linux is the most widespread operating system, globally – but how is it built? Few people are better to answer this than Greg Kroah-Hartman (Greg K-H): Greg has been a Linux kernel maintainer for 25 years, and one of the 3 Linux Kernel Foundation Fellows (the other two are Linus Torvalds and Shuah Khan). Greg manages the Linux kernel’s stable releases, and is a maintainer of multiple kernel subsystems. We cover the inner workings of Linux kernel development, exploring everything from how changes get implemented to why its community-driven approach produces such reliable software. Greg shares insights about the kernel's unique trust model and makes a case for why engineers should contribute to open-source projects. Watch or listen: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Brought to you buy: • WorkOS — The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. • Vanta — Automate compliance and simplify security with Vanta. Check out all of our current sponsor and their offerings: ---- One of the most surprising things I learned about Linux: although 4,000 developers contribute to the project from 500 companies per year, and has around 800 kernel maintainers, the project is run with email, git... and that's about it! No dedicated project managers, no regular meetings across the group. It's a truly fascinating and unique model (and only applies to the Linux kernel project: not to Linux distributions.) We go into more detail about this topic with Greg in the podcast as well.

Gergely Orosz

51,383 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

$ETH I finally show my ETH positions here. In Trading you want to develop your system so that you can identify setups that you are comfortable taking. It could be as simple as a moving average cross over. But that is where people fall short. They only focus on nailing the entries. No one told them the most important part was holding onto the gains. And so you want to develop a stop loss system. It could just be using a generic trailing stop. An entry and a stop is a system. And any system will give you better results than just trading on emotion and what people say on X. Here is my method. My system. And how we are currently using it on Ethereum.
3:58

$ETH I finally show my ETH positions here. In Trading you want to develop your system so that you can identify setups that you are comfortable taking. It could be as simple as a moving average cross over. But that is where people fall short. They only focus on nailing the entries. No one told them the most important part was holding onto the gains. And so you want to develop a stop loss system. It could just be using a generic trailing stop. An entry and a stop is a system. And any system will give you better results than just trading on emotion and what people say on X. Here is my method. My system. And how we are currently using it on Ethereum.

Wick 🔥

22,538 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

A LINUX KERNEL DEVELOPER PROVED THE THING YOU PUSH CODE TO IS SECRETLY A DATABASE THAT CAN VERSION ALMOST ANYTHING AND THAT MOST DEVS HAVE ONLY EVER TOUCHED A TENTH OF IT 42 minutes from Josh Triplett -- a longtime Linux kernel and Debian developer -- showing that Git is a general-purpose, tamper-evident versioning engine that just happens to be famous for code. -> The moment it clicks, Git stops being "Where my code lives" and becomes what it really is underneath: a content-addressable store that can version almost anything -- your configs, your notes, your servers' state, entire datasets. People run whole wikis on it. They version their entire machine's configuration with it. They ship websites by pushing to it. They track data too big to email. None of it is a hack -- it's the same handful of objects you already use for code, pointed somewhere new. Treating Git as a code-only tool was never the ceiling -> it's a versioning engine for anything, and the people who see that automate what the rest of the team still does by hand. And as AI agents start spitting out not just code but configs, docs and data, the one system that can version and audit all of it at once is already sitting on your machine. You learned five commands to survive. This is the talk that shows you were standing on top of a database the whole time. It changes what you think the tool is even for. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓
42:24

A LINUX KERNEL DEVELOPER PROVED THE THING YOU PUSH CODE TO IS SECRETLY A DATABASE THAT CAN VERSION ALMOST ANYTHING AND THAT MOST DEVS HAVE ONLY EVER TOUCHED A TENTH OF IT 42 minutes from Josh Triplett -- a longtime Linux kernel and Debian developer -- showing that Git is a general-purpose, tamper-evident versioning engine that just happens to be famous for code. -> The moment it clicks, Git stops being "Where my code lives" and becomes what it really is underneath: a content-addressable store that can version almost anything -- your configs, your notes, your servers' state, entire datasets. People run whole wikis on it. They version their entire machine's configuration with it. They ship websites by pushing to it. They track data too big to email. None of it is a hack -- it's the same handful of objects you already use for code, pointed somewhere new. Treating Git as a code-only tool was never the ceiling -> it's a versioning engine for anything, and the people who see that automate what the rest of the team still does by hand. And as AI agents start spitting out not just code but configs, docs and data, the one system that can version and audit all of it at once is already sitting on your machine. You learned five commands to survive. This is the talk that shows you were standing on top of a database the whole time. It changes what you think the tool is even for. Bookmark & Watch it today ↓

slash1s

385,976 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

U-Boot menu now works on Flipper One Now you can choose different kernels and systemd targets before the Linux kernel boots. * It's our LCD/buttons driver plus a slightly modified vanilla U-Boot menu. Will try to upstream it to U-Boot. * This is a temporary solution for testing the selection of different OS profiles. In the final version of Flipper OS, we’ll most likely draw the boot menu using a small program compiled into initramfs, after the kernel has started. But as a temporary solution, it works perfect. * I’m still not happy with the cold boot time: from powering on the processor to having a working menu. Here’s the boot log with timestamps, captured from the processor console: * Our patched U-Boot:
2:56

U-Boot menu now works on Flipper One Now you can choose different kernels and systemd targets before the Linux kernel boots. * It's our LCD/buttons driver plus a slightly modified vanilla U-Boot menu. Will try to upstream it to U-Boot. * This is a temporary solution for testing the selection of different OS profiles. In the final version of Flipper OS, we’ll most likely draw the boot menu using a small program compiled into initramfs, after the kernel has started. But as a temporary solution, it works perfect. * I’m still not happy with the cold boot time: from powering on the processor to having a working menu. Here’s the boot log with timestamps, captured from the processor console: * Our patched U-Boot:

Flipper R&D

33,703 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER REACTS TO LG TV SPYWARE INVESTIGATION, WARNS ABOUT SMART DEVICES A new investigation found that LG Smart TVs were reportedly scanning users’ home networks, tracking viewing activity, and recording nearby conversations, even when the television was disconnected from the internet. Thomas Drake warns that a TV screen can become a surveillance device. Anything connected to a network can potentially be exploited by private companies or the government. The concern goes beyond what you watch. Massive amounts of data are collected even when a device is no longer connected to the network. The modern TV is no longer just a screen in your living room. It functions as a network sensor, and potentially a listening device, inside one of the most constitutionally protected spaces in America: your home.
5:10

NSA WHISTLEBLOWER REACTS TO LG TV SPYWARE INVESTIGATION, WARNS ABOUT SMART DEVICES A new investigation found that LG Smart TVs were reportedly scanning users’ home networks, tracking viewing activity, and recording nearby conversations, even when the television was disconnected from the internet. Thomas Drake warns that a TV screen can become a surveillance device. Anything connected to a network can potentially be exploited by private companies or the government. The concern goes beyond what you watch. Massive amounts of data are collected even when a device is no longer connected to the network. The modern TV is no longer just a screen in your living room. It functions as a network sensor, and potentially a listening device, inside one of the most constitutionally protected spaces in America: your home.

Redacted

17,236 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Koinos 101: $KOIN We all know that the current financial system wasn’t designed to empower us, it was designed to extract wealth from everything we do while limiting our ability to take control over our lives and our livelihoods. But Koinos is a new, free-to-use, high performance, monetary system, financial system, and computer system all rolled into one and KOIN is the digital currency that makes it all work because holding KOIN gives you the RIGHT to use the network for free, forever. It’s that simple. Own Your Network On Ethereum, Cardano, Solana, and most other blockchains, holding the token doesn’t give you a right to do anything other than pay the fees they charge you to use their system. Insiders Bad On other blockchains you don’t own anything and almost all of them gave tokens to insiders before the public. Those insiders unfairly influence and profit off your use of those systems... so they're no different than the system we already have, and are trying to change! Bitcoin-style Mining There are no KOIN insiders because every KOIN token had to be mined, just like Bitcoin, and holding KOIN gives you total and perpetual control over a certain amount of the network’s resources, so you are in charge. Utility+ Holding KOIN has real utility but there’s even more you can do with KOIN, by BURNING it. But if KOIN is so great, why on Earth would you want to burn it? Unlike Bitcoin, which has wasteful mining that increases the costs of running the network, you can run Koinos on your existing computer because there is no mining. Instead, by sacrificing your right to use the network and lowering the supply of KOIN, you gain another right; the right to help run the network and acquire even more newly created KOIN. Be The Insider KOIN has no insiders, which means you are the insider, and it has real utility. You can either use the network for free or burn your tokens, creating deflationary pressure, in exchange for the right to run the network and earn a percentage of newly created KOIN tokens. All of this gives KOIN a uniquely deflationary and inflationary design that makes it more dynamic and secure. Whole New Game While most blockchains and cryptocurrencies play the same old games, reinventing the same problems in the current system, Koinos plays an entirely new game with a whole new “coin” of the realm ;). Imagine a financial universe where you hold the power. Where every decision you make with your assets has tangible benefits not just for you, but for everyone because you're supporting the integrity and growth of a revolutionary system with no barriers to entry. This is a new society where the balance of power is provably in your hands, and where you are more than just a user or developer, you’re a founding member. That's the promise of Koinos. More than a promise; it’s a reality, verifiable on the main net today. So, do you want to continue being just another pawn in someone else’s game, or do you want to take control and start calling the shots? To learn more about how you can take control with Koinos, go to and
2:38

Koinos 101: $KOIN We all know that the current financial system wasn’t designed to empower us, it was designed to extract wealth from everything we do while limiting our ability to take control over our lives and our livelihoods. But Koinos is a new, free-to-use, high performance, monetary system, financial system, and computer system all rolled into one and KOIN is the digital currency that makes it all work because holding KOIN gives you the RIGHT to use the network for free, forever. It’s that simple. Own Your Network On Ethereum, Cardano, Solana, and most other blockchains, holding the token doesn’t give you a right to do anything other than pay the fees they charge you to use their system. Insiders Bad On other blockchains you don’t own anything and almost all of them gave tokens to insiders before the public. Those insiders unfairly influence and profit off your use of those systems... so they're no different than the system we already have, and are trying to change! Bitcoin-style Mining There are no KOIN insiders because every KOIN token had to be mined, just like Bitcoin, and holding KOIN gives you total and perpetual control over a certain amount of the network’s resources, so you are in charge. Utility+ Holding KOIN has real utility but there’s even more you can do with KOIN, by BURNING it. But if KOIN is so great, why on Earth would you want to burn it? Unlike Bitcoin, which has wasteful mining that increases the costs of running the network, you can run Koinos on your existing computer because there is no mining. Instead, by sacrificing your right to use the network and lowering the supply of KOIN, you gain another right; the right to help run the network and acquire even more newly created KOIN. Be The Insider KOIN has no insiders, which means you are the insider, and it has real utility. You can either use the network for free or burn your tokens, creating deflationary pressure, in exchange for the right to run the network and earn a percentage of newly created KOIN tokens. All of this gives KOIN a uniquely deflationary and inflationary design that makes it more dynamic and secure. Whole New Game While most blockchains and cryptocurrencies play the same old games, reinventing the same problems in the current system, Koinos plays an entirely new game with a whole new “coin” of the realm ;). Imagine a financial universe where you hold the power. Where every decision you make with your assets has tangible benefits not just for you, but for everyone because you're supporting the integrity and growth of a revolutionary system with no barriers to entry. This is a new society where the balance of power is provably in your hands, and where you are more than just a user or developer, you’re a founding member. That's the promise of Koinos. More than a promise; it’s a reality, verifiable on the main net today. So, do you want to continue being just another pawn in someone else’s game, or do you want to take control and start calling the shots? To learn more about how you can take control with Koinos, go to and

KoinosGroup 🔮

811,680 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

Looking for the best label design for the USB port on Flipper One USB-C1 is the main USB port on Flipper One. It can do all of the following: • Power IN/OUT — it can charge Flipper One and power other devices. • Video OUT — it supports DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB-C so you can connect it to an external monitor. • USB Host + Device — it can emulate USB devices such as Ethernet adapters, mass-storage devices, or serial ports, while also acting as a USB host for connected peripherals. The challenge is to communicate all of this with a single label on the device itself, so users do not have to read the manual. We are trying to make the labeling as clear and compact as possible. This video walks through the constraints we faced, the options we considered, and the trade-offs behind each one. Watch it and let us know what you think. Which label makes the most sense to you? Do you have a better idea? Share it in this GitHub issue:
5:23

Looking for the best label design for the USB port on Flipper One USB-C1 is the main USB port on Flipper One. It can do all of the following: • Power IN/OUT — it can charge Flipper One and power other devices. • Video OUT — it supports DisplayPort Alt Mode over USB-C so you can connect it to an external monitor. • USB Host + Device — it can emulate USB devices such as Ethernet adapters, mass-storage devices, or serial ports, while also acting as a USB host for connected peripherals. The challenge is to communicate all of this with a single label on the device itself, so users do not have to read the manual. We are trying to make the labeling as clear and compact as possible. This video walks through the constraints we faced, the options we considered, and the trade-offs behind each one. Watch it and let us know what you think. Which label makes the most sense to you? Do you have a better idea? Share it in this GitHub issue:

Flipper R&D

27,358 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

john bollinger invented the most famous indicator in trading. after 46 years he can tell if your system will fail before you finish explaining it: "you can tell immediately whether it's going to be successful by how many lines it is. if it takes two or three lines to describe it, the odds are it could be a very good system. if it takes 150 lines to describe it, the odds are it's going to be a terrible system." "we want to understand what we do on an intuitive level. the only way to do that is if it's simple." complexity in a trading system is usually just overfitting.
1:57

john bollinger invented the most famous indicator in trading. after 46 years he can tell if your system will fail before you finish explaining it: "you can tell immediately whether it's going to be successful by how many lines it is. if it takes two or three lines to describe it, the odds are it could be a very good system. if it takes 150 lines to describe it, the odds are it's going to be a terrible system." "we want to understand what we do on an intuitive level. the only way to do that is if it's simple." complexity in a trading system is usually just overfitting.

Goshawk Trades

15,108 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

I’ve been running Ubuntu on my second machine for over a decade. After seeing another breakdown of Omarchy, this time from NetworkChuck, I’m fully making the switch today. He changed the entire desktop theme in seconds, used an AI agent to build a Quickshell plugin, handed a crashed process to the agent for diagnosis, ran games through Proton, and launched a Windows VM when Linux wasn’t enough. Omarchy isn’t just Arch with a nice desktop. It starts with Arch, Hyprland, Quickshell, and a keyboard-first workflow, then gives you an environment you can continue reshaping around how you work (the linux boys calls this ricing). The operating system can become another surface your agents can help you modify. Ubuntu had a great run. Omarchy loading…
0:28

I’ve been running Ubuntu on my second machine for over a decade. After seeing another breakdown of Omarchy, this time from NetworkChuck, I’m fully making the switch today. He changed the entire desktop theme in seconds, used an AI agent to build a Quickshell plugin, handed a crashed process to the agent for diagnosis, ran games through Proton, and launched a Windows VM when Linux wasn’t enough. Omarchy isn’t just Arch with a nice desktop. It starts with Arch, Hyprland, Quickshell, and a keyboard-first workflow, then gives you an environment you can continue reshaping around how you work (the linux boys calls this ricing). The operating system can become another surface your agents can help you modify. Ubuntu had a great run. Omarchy loading…

Hybrid 🏃🏾

35,708 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The subject of 'owning a slave' is dense. It is something we hear a lot when we are in the FemDom Realm. Is it just fantasy? Can it actually be a lifestyle? How do we navigate this type of dynamic? How do we even get to that level of D/s? In this short clip [Exerpt from SLAVE TRAINING Part 2] I want to already bring to your attention one thing that will define if your desire for a slave (or desire as a slave) is touching more on a fantasy or... how can you actually navigate this in a realistic way. No one person 'can do it all' or should be expected to. If you want your slave to be 'the best' , assign them a specific role in which they can excel... and then build upon that. Once they 'master' your housekeeping (which takes quite a bit of real training), they can move to other levels. And an important note I want to leave here... make them EARN access to certain things in your life that sometimes you just want to delegate because you don't want to manage or don't know how to manage. Entrusting them with serious tasks that can affect your life, your business, your reputation, are on top of the ladder. Are they even qualified for the thing you want them to take off your shoulders? Start small and allow them to grow in their submission, to develop their skills and to learn how to best satisfy you without setting them up for failure by expecting too much, too quick. In the end, if you want this to truly work, you have to approach it from a place that transcends the roles. As this is consensual power exchange. And you both want to be fulfilled in that relationship.
1:16

The subject of 'owning a slave' is dense. It is something we hear a lot when we are in the FemDom Realm. Is it just fantasy? Can it actually be a lifestyle? How do we navigate this type of dynamic? How do we even get to that level of D/s? In this short clip [Exerpt from SLAVE TRAINING Part 2] I want to already bring to your attention one thing that will define if your desire for a slave (or desire as a slave) is touching more on a fantasy or... how can you actually navigate this in a realistic way. No one person 'can do it all' or should be expected to. If you want your slave to be 'the best' , assign them a specific role in which they can excel... and then build upon that. Once they 'master' your housekeeping (which takes quite a bit of real training), they can move to other levels. And an important note I want to leave here... make them EARN access to certain things in your life that sometimes you just want to delegate because you don't want to manage or don't know how to manage. Entrusting them with serious tasks that can affect your life, your business, your reputation, are on top of the ladder. Are they even qualified for the thing you want them to take off your shoulders? Start small and allow them to grow in their submission, to develop their skills and to learn how to best satisfy you without setting them up for failure by expecting too much, too quick. In the end, if you want this to truly work, you have to approach it from a place that transcends the roles. As this is consensual power exchange. And you both want to be fulfilled in that relationship.

Ms. Malissia

13,796 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Elon Musk says smartphones won't exist in 5 years. "We're not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. What we call a phone will really be an edge node for AI inference, with some radios to obviously connect, but essentially you'll have AI on the server side communicating to an AI on your device." "There won't be operating systems, there won't be apps in the future. You've got a device that is there for the screen and audio to put as much AI on the device as possible so as to minimize the amount of bandwidth needed between your edge node device and the servers." "You'll get everything through AI. Whatever you can think of, or really whatever the AI can anticipate you can think of, it'll show you." "It's probably five or six years, something like that."
1:46

Elon Musk says smartphones won't exist in 5 years. "We're not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. What we call a phone will really be an edge node for AI inference, with some radios to obviously connect, but essentially you'll have AI on the server side communicating to an AI on your device." "There won't be operating systems, there won't be apps in the future. You've got a device that is there for the screen and audio to put as much AI on the device as possible so as to minimize the amount of bandwidth needed between your edge node device and the servers." "You'll get everything through AI. Whatever you can think of, or really whatever the AI can anticipate you can think of, it'll show you." "It's probably five or six years, something like that."

Metav3rse

646,103 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

We just launched a generative craft system inside Marble App. Kids can now create anything and turn it into a 3D object on their map. It's designed to be realistic, so kids have to use their brain to make things happen. It works like this: 1) You describe or sketch what you want to build 2) Marble creates a blueprint you can iterate on 3) You pick the resources and tools you think you need to make it (if you have them) 4) Marble crafts the object. If the build is successful and you can drop it on your map! Since you can create your own tools, there is no limit to what you can build with this system. So excited to see what kids make with it!
0:51

We just launched a generative craft system inside Marble App. Kids can now create anything and turn it into a 3D object on their map. It's designed to be realistic, so kids have to use their brain to make things happen. It works like this: 1) You describe or sketch what you want to build 2) Marble creates a blueprint you can iterate on 3) You pick the resources and tools you think you need to make it (if you have them) 4) Marble crafts the object. If the build is successful and you can drop it on your map! Since you can create your own tools, there is no limit to what you can build with this system. So excited to see what kids make with it!

Lionel Mora

22,203 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

‼️EXPOSED: The Government PATENTED A Mind Control Device That MANIPULATES Your Emotions — And It's HIDDEN In Your TV😱 For decades they laughed at us for saying the government can control us through our TVs. Now we have proof that that is exactly the case. The U.S. government patented a device that can manipulate our emotional and mental state by embedding certain electromagnetic frequency pulses into our movies, TV, and news, which can then be distributed to all of us through any monitor. That basically sends our brains subliminal messages that can control our minds. Read the Patent for yourself, U.S. Patent number 6506148 B2. Title: Nervous System Manipulation By Electromagnetic Fields From Monitors. Granted in 2003. Not a blog. A patent. It is a blueprint. Pulsed electromagnetic fields off a TV, cell phone or computer monitor, tuned to create sensory resonance in the brain. You do not see it. You do not hear it. The picture looks normal. Behind the image are little pulses your nervous system picks up anyway. The most chilling line in the filing is this: you can embed those pulses in the program itself. Not a second box under the set. The show. The movie. The news. Any video. That is what they wrote down and the government stamped. This is why you cannot be a passive viewer anymore. The patent is active. The delivery system is already in your living room, on your desk, and in your pocket. Watch like someone is in the signal. Because on paper, they already figured out how.
1:52

‼️EXPOSED: The Government PATENTED A Mind Control Device That MANIPULATES Your Emotions — And It's HIDDEN In Your TV😱 For decades they laughed at us for saying the government can control us through our TVs. Now we have proof that that is exactly the case. The U.S. government patented a device that can manipulate our emotional and mental state by embedding certain electromagnetic frequency pulses into our movies, TV, and news, which can then be distributed to all of us through any monitor. That basically sends our brains subliminal messages that can control our minds. Read the Patent for yourself, U.S. Patent number 6506148 B2. Title: Nervous System Manipulation By Electromagnetic Fields From Monitors. Granted in 2003. Not a blog. A patent. It is a blueprint. Pulsed electromagnetic fields off a TV, cell phone or computer monitor, tuned to create sensory resonance in the brain. You do not see it. You do not hear it. The picture looks normal. Behind the image are little pulses your nervous system picks up anyway. The most chilling line in the filing is this: you can embed those pulses in the program itself. Not a second box under the set. The show. The movie. The news. Any video. That is what they wrote down and the government stamped. This is why you cannot be a passive viewer anymore. The patent is active. The delivery system is already in your living room, on your desk, and in your pocket. Watch like someone is in the signal. Because on paper, they already figured out how.

Project Constitution

34,083 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025
2:13

Right now our experience of the internet is in jeopardy. More than half of our interactions online and onchain come from non-human actors who are not identifiable, not accountable, not verifiable. That means as we look toward a stablecoin payment and AI agent enabled future, how are we going to facilitate payments if we don't know who we're paying? How will applications, display advertising, recommendations work if the counterparty who's interacting with those interfaces and in those digital spaces can’t identify itself as agent or human, or specific human? Or for things like onchain incentives, how can we ensure that tokens and value are arriving at the right users if we cannot tell Sybil accounts and redundant addresses from unique human beings? So for all of these use cases and more, things that touch enterprise and government as well, which we can get into later, we have a very glaring need to bring a layer of identity and trust to the internet that was originally built as a system, a network to communicate amongst computers, but lacked an identity system to acknowledge their users. That's the problem that we are solving with Billions Network. How can we make it really easy for you and the agents who serve you to prove who you are, your traits and capabilities and qualifications, in any space, physical or digital? What that means is that today Billions Network is the first universal human and AI network built with mobile first verification, so you can prove who you are and your agents can prove who they are, starting with comfortable experiences on the devices you already own. So no proprietary hardware. We do not rely on centralized servers to collect user data. Rather, your information, the sensitive data that makes you you, stays securely on your device. And we use zero knowledge proofs as a way to prove traits about you, such as the fact that you're over the age of 21, without revealing that sensitive personal data, such as what your exact birth date is. Source: Billions CEO Evin McMullen evin speaking at House of Chimera Spaces Event Dec 3, 2025

Billions Network

30,916 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The AI run operating system. Zengyi Qin shows me how AI will control our computers and bring a new way of computing to our homes and businesses. Such an honor to have him in my home yesterday. It lets AI agents run Macintosh, Windows, and Linux boxes like a human can. But I see it as a bigger deal than that. It, and a few other companies, are laying down the groundwork for robots, and humans with AI glasses, or brain/computer interfaces, to run our world in a whole new way.
38:42

The AI run operating system. Zengyi Qin shows me how AI will control our computers and bring a new way of computing to our homes and businesses. Such an honor to have him in my home yesterday. It lets AI agents run Macintosh, Windows, and Linux boxes like a human can. But I see it as a bigger deal than that. It, and a few other companies, are laying down the groundwork for robots, and humans with AI glasses, or brain/computer interfaces, to run our world in a whole new way.

Robert Scoble

21,729 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

"I could see the growth of the stablecoin market dramatically eclipsing the growth of the euro dollar market. And so over time, you've kind of got these parallel systems and the new system is kind of cannibalizing the old system. But I also think, from a government's perspective, you don't want it all just to disappear because of some blackout or some. So I think physical currency is still going to exist. One of the ways that they fund these black projects is through cash because it's not traceable, right? I don't think that the Pentagon wants to put all of their transactions on the blockchain that everybody can see. It's almost like a belt in suspenders. They're going to have kind of redundant systems. And so one system is physical cash. Another system is gold. Another system is the traditional euro dollar market. And the newest system is this US dollar stablecoin. So it's a number of different systems through which you can deliver the same value." Santiago Capital of 💰 🔗
2:05

"I could see the growth of the stablecoin market dramatically eclipsing the growth of the euro dollar market. And so over time, you've kind of got these parallel systems and the new system is kind of cannibalizing the old system. But I also think, from a government's perspective, you don't want it all just to disappear because of some blackout or some. So I think physical currency is still going to exist. One of the ways that they fund these black projects is through cash because it's not traceable, right? I don't think that the Pentagon wants to put all of their transactions on the blockchain that everybody can see. It's almost like a belt in suspenders. They're going to have kind of redundant systems. And so one system is physical cash. Another system is gold. Another system is the traditional euro dollar market. And the newest system is this US dollar stablecoin. So it's a number of different systems through which you can deliver the same value." Santiago Capital of 💰 🔗

Geopolitics & Empire

18,942 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Satoshi Roundtable is later this week. Tech Talk Tuesdays in Dubai asked me about the upcoming event: “My hope is that have for this week is that we embrace what this industry is all about. It’s not about Blackrock, or CBDCs or the filthy broken fiat system - it’s about an alternative to that. A lot of people can point to many broken things in our world. And the root of what is broken is because of the broken money system. The money system is broken. There is death and destruction because of a broken money system and what this technology represents is something different than that. It’s an alternate to that. And that’s what makes it unique and that’s what makes it valuable.”
1:09

Satoshi Roundtable is later this week. Tech Talk Tuesdays in Dubai asked me about the upcoming event: “My hope is that have for this week is that we embrace what this industry is all about. It’s not about Blackrock, or CBDCs or the filthy broken fiat system - it’s about an alternative to that. A lot of people can point to many broken things in our world. And the root of what is broken is because of the broken money system. The money system is broken. There is death and destruction because of a broken money system and what this technology represents is something different than that. It’s an alternate to that. And that’s what makes it unique and that’s what makes it valuable.”

Bruce Fenton

11,260 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The best way to take advantage of ChatGPT Voice. I am completely and utterly voice-pilled. Voice interaction with AI is going to change the way humans interact with computers. Here's what you can do: 1. Create a remote connection to an always-on desktop PC through the ChatGPT Desktop app (I have a Linux box in my basement) 2. Customize the ChatGPT iOS widget and add a remote voice connection 3. Tap the widget. It will open a voice chat in ChatGPT Work/Codex, on your desktop, with access to your files and all your apps. It's like an always on Jarvis that has its own computer. Amazing stuff. Try it out!
0:28

The best way to take advantage of ChatGPT Voice. I am completely and utterly voice-pilled. Voice interaction with AI is going to change the way humans interact with computers. Here's what you can do: 1. Create a remote connection to an always-on desktop PC through the ChatGPT Desktop app (I have a Linux box in my basement) 2. Customize the ChatGPT iOS widget and add a remote voice connection 3. Tap the widget. It will open a voice chat in ChatGPT Work/Codex, on your desktop, with access to your files and all your apps. It's like an always on Jarvis that has its own computer. Amazing stuff. Try it out!

Dan McAteer

46,299 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

We just submitted our project to the OpenAI Developers WebMCP hackathon: The WebMCP Computer. WebMCP Computer is an operating system that lives inside the browser, with WebMCP as its native control layer. It is a computer that treats agents as first-class citizens, where files, processes, applications, windows, and the terminal are exposed directly through WebMCP. You can send anyone one URL that becomes a disposable computer for any agent task. We created a computer instance in ChatGPT Sites, open it with Codex’s in-app browser and try it here: Some examples of what you can do with WebMCP Computer: 1/ Give a coding agent a fresh computer to clone a repository, edit code, run tests, and preview the result. 2/ Let an agent inspect logs, manage processes, change configurations, and repair a broken system. 3/ Give a research agent its own workspace to browse, download files, analyze data, and create a report. 4/ Create reproducible environments for evaluating and comparing different agents. 5/ Let humans and agents work together in the same environment, with the agent using WebMCP and the human using the GUI. The list of applications is endless, with more examples in our GitHub. The project is fully open source under the MIT license. Created by our awesome founding engineer Ilay Alog.
2:36

We just submitted our project to the OpenAI Developers WebMCP hackathon: The WebMCP Computer. WebMCP Computer is an operating system that lives inside the browser, with WebMCP as its native control layer. It is a computer that treats agents as first-class citizens, where files, processes, applications, windows, and the terminal are exposed directly through WebMCP. You can send anyone one URL that becomes a disposable computer for any agent task. We created a computer instance in ChatGPT Sites, open it with Codex’s in-app browser and try it here: Some examples of what you can do with WebMCP Computer: 1/ Give a coding agent a fresh computer to clone a repository, edit code, run tests, and preview the result. 2/ Let an agent inspect logs, manage processes, change configurations, and repair a broken system. 3/ Give a research agent its own workspace to browse, download files, analyze data, and create a report. 4/ Create reproducible environments for evaluating and comparing different agents. 5/ Let humans and agents work together in the same environment, with the agent using WebMCP and the human using the GUI. The list of applications is endless, with more examples in our GitHub. The project is fully open source under the MIT license. Created by our awesome founding engineer Ilay Alog.

idan levin

28,153 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Vallée and the Closed System: Are We Prisoners? 🧠👽 Vallée: "Are We Being Taken Over by a Species from Somewhere in Space That's Vastly More Intelligent Than We Are?" 👽🧠 "..the simulation...was a new concept that I initially rejected." ~Vallée "Is it looking for us to try to interact with it as equals or with parity?" ~Scafish "Nobody says that to Congress, and I think Congress should hear it." ~Vallée If, "it's a closed system, we're like prisoners and something is going to happen to us, and there is very little we can do." ~Vallée Turn the thermostat dial. "If the temperature doesn't change, then I know I'm inside a control system. So, we can do the same thing with UFOs, but we have to react. We have to, number one, acknowledge that it exists, and number two, we have to react to it." ~Vallée ~~~ I've been wanting to share this one for a while... Vallée: "So, he said, the question you have to ask about UFOs is, number one, is it a natural system or an artificial system...control system. And if it is a control system, is it open or closed? In other words, are we being taken over by a species from somewhere in space that's vastly more intelligent than we are?" (I've never heard him even suggest that possibility.) Vallée: "You know, as Dr. Garry P. Nolan says, you know, people who have had ten, you know, scientific revolutions, or a hundred or a thousand, and come here with superior science to do something... And in which case, you know, it's a closed system, we're like prisoners and something is going to happen to us, and there is very little we can do. Or, is it an open system where we can, in fact, communicate with it. And if we can communicate with it, then the question for me as an information scientist is, what are the modalities of the interaction, you know? It's not just can we learn their language? And they say, you know, 'We come in peace to save mankind,' or something. Or 'We will give you the cure for cancer' or something. I don't think it's at that level." (Will we ever be able to get answers to these extremely important questions? If it's an open system, how do we communicate with it? How do we provoke it to react? We know it reacts to anything nuclear but we still don't know why. This is why we need the USG (and other governments) to present evidence that shows the masses this is real and extremely important for our species to investigate. If that evidence exists and is shown, we'll have an easier time getting the world's best minds to join the effort in figuring out the best way to answer these questions. We still may fail but we should at least try.) Vallée: "I think it's a meta-system. It's not a system. And that's my fear...if we can circle back to your earlier question about, you know, about NIDS and about BAASS, what we did for the government and what we did for the Defense Intelligence Agency. Half of the budget was spent developing, you know, a super database. And we don't know where it went. I mean, I'm not cleared to know where it went." (On the contractor (BAASS) side, Bigelow should have all copies of what AAWSAP produced. And on the DIA side, Lacatksi said he put all of the digital files in a specific place that he didn't name. As long as someone didn't delete it all, it should still be there. Vallée has said that the Capella database has about 250,000 cases from around the world.) Vallée: "But that would be a very interesting question, because the people who are getting [the database] are getting raw data, which we have very well organized, all in English. So they have the luxury of, you know, we had five translators from French, English, Portuguese, Russian, you know, everything was translated in a single structure across fourteen databases. "That's what we need to answer the question about the control system, and it's not being done. And we hired a whole team that we had trained to work on it. So to rebuild that will take the next ten or fifteen years. And nobody says that to Congress, and I think Congress should hear it, because it's our money." (As long as names and personal details are scrubbed from that database, there is no reason NOT to release it to the public. This way, we can take it and use AI to help decipher patterns and maybe answer some of these questions. Can Congress help us get access to that database?) Vallée: "When you ask, is it a control system? That's a big question." Peter Scafish Peter Skafish - "You asked, at one point, whether the system is open or closed, and you said, additionally, I believe, if it's open, that it would be possible to communicate back to it. And it sounds to me like that's the key question for you. Is, if you can understand what what the system of symbols is, or the modalities of communication, then you can understand enough to engage in some kind of communication, or at least give some kind of response to show that you understand." Vallée: "Yes." Scafish: "So then the question, and we have a member named Jacqueline, who has asked this. Could the system be stimulating us - provided there is such a system - to interact with it, more as subjects or agents than as something like animals or objects? Is it looking for us to try to interact with it as equals or with parity?" (When people report getting injured or sick from being in close proximity to UAP, it suggests to me that the phenomenon won't go out of its way to avoid affecting us in a negative manner if we get in their its/way (assuming it even knows that close encounters with UAP are not good for humans). Kind of like how we treat lower lifeforms. If we encounter a wild rabbit crossing the road, many of us will do our best to avoid it, but not if it means damaging our car or ourselves in an accident. It may ruin our day if we hit it, but it won't stop us from driving again in the future. Do NHI have bad days if their tech injures us or makes us sick? I have no clue.) Vallée: "Well, what I saw in the notes you gave me, is she was also asking: Is it a control system because we think it is? And that's a very interesting question. Because we react to the UFO phenomenon, or the UAP phenomenon. And, you know, at this point when I think about what I'm going to do next in this research, if I'm given the the opportunity to live a little longer, I'm not going to go back and write any more computer programs. There are better people to do that now, they have the data, and we're in a different phase now. We're in a whole different system. I have the luxury of doing some experiments I wanted to do for a long time." (Would have liked Scafish to ask him: What types of experiments?) Vallée: "So, if you think you are inside the control system, there are things that you can do. Or, if you think you're inside the simulation, you know, which was a new concept that I initially rejected, and then, you know, Ray's (Kurzweil?) work and others have brought it back to the forefront. And we have to ask that at the same time. Can we test it? How would you test it? Well, if, you know, I'm here in my apartment, and the temperature is constant in this apartment. But outside, I can see it's cold, or I can see the sun is out and it's warm, and how come it's constant here? So this would lead me to think that there is a control system, namely a thermostat, that is somewhere. "So I can start looking around the walls, and if I see dial, I can turn it, or I could start a fire and see what happens, see if the temperature changes. If the temperature doesn't change, then I know I'm inside a control system. So, we can do the same thing with UFOs, but we have to react. We have to, number one, acknowledge that it exists, and number two, we have to react to it."
7:26

Vallée and the Closed System: Are We Prisoners? 🧠👽 Vallée: "Are We Being Taken Over by a Species from Somewhere in Space That's Vastly More Intelligent Than We Are?" 👽🧠 "..the simulation...was a new concept that I initially rejected." ~Vallée "Is it looking for us to try to interact with it as equals or with parity?" ~Scafish "Nobody says that to Congress, and I think Congress should hear it." ~Vallée If, "it's a closed system, we're like prisoners and something is going to happen to us, and there is very little we can do." ~Vallée Turn the thermostat dial. "If the temperature doesn't change, then I know I'm inside a control system. So, we can do the same thing with UFOs, but we have to react. We have to, number one, acknowledge that it exists, and number two, we have to react to it." ~Vallée ~~~ I've been wanting to share this one for a while... Vallée: "So, he said, the question you have to ask about UFOs is, number one, is it a natural system or an artificial system...control system. And if it is a control system, is it open or closed? In other words, are we being taken over by a species from somewhere in space that's vastly more intelligent than we are?" (I've never heard him even suggest that possibility.) Vallée: "You know, as Dr. Garry P. Nolan says, you know, people who have had ten, you know, scientific revolutions, or a hundred or a thousand, and come here with superior science to do something... And in which case, you know, it's a closed system, we're like prisoners and something is going to happen to us, and there is very little we can do. Or, is it an open system where we can, in fact, communicate with it. And if we can communicate with it, then the question for me as an information scientist is, what are the modalities of the interaction, you know? It's not just can we learn their language? And they say, you know, 'We come in peace to save mankind,' or something. Or 'We will give you the cure for cancer' or something. I don't think it's at that level." (Will we ever be able to get answers to these extremely important questions? If it's an open system, how do we communicate with it? How do we provoke it to react? We know it reacts to anything nuclear but we still don't know why. This is why we need the USG (and other governments) to present evidence that shows the masses this is real and extremely important for our species to investigate. If that evidence exists and is shown, we'll have an easier time getting the world's best minds to join the effort in figuring out the best way to answer these questions. We still may fail but we should at least try.) Vallée: "I think it's a meta-system. It's not a system. And that's my fear...if we can circle back to your earlier question about, you know, about NIDS and about BAASS, what we did for the government and what we did for the Defense Intelligence Agency. Half of the budget was spent developing, you know, a super database. And we don't know where it went. I mean, I'm not cleared to know where it went." (On the contractor (BAASS) side, Bigelow should have all copies of what AAWSAP produced. And on the DIA side, Lacatksi said he put all of the digital files in a specific place that he didn't name. As long as someone didn't delete it all, it should still be there. Vallée has said that the Capella database has about 250,000 cases from around the world.) Vallée: "But that would be a very interesting question, because the people who are getting [the database] are getting raw data, which we have very well organized, all in English. So they have the luxury of, you know, we had five translators from French, English, Portuguese, Russian, you know, everything was translated in a single structure across fourteen databases. "That's what we need to answer the question about the control system, and it's not being done. And we hired a whole team that we had trained to work on it. So to rebuild that will take the next ten or fifteen years. And nobody says that to Congress, and I think Congress should hear it, because it's our money." (As long as names and personal details are scrubbed from that database, there is no reason NOT to release it to the public. This way, we can take it and use AI to help decipher patterns and maybe answer some of these questions. Can Congress help us get access to that database?) Vallée: "When you ask, is it a control system? That's a big question." Peter Scafish Peter Skafish - "You asked, at one point, whether the system is open or closed, and you said, additionally, I believe, if it's open, that it would be possible to communicate back to it. And it sounds to me like that's the key question for you. Is, if you can understand what what the system of symbols is, or the modalities of communication, then you can understand enough to engage in some kind of communication, or at least give some kind of response to show that you understand." Vallée: "Yes." Scafish: "So then the question, and we have a member named Jacqueline, who has asked this. Could the system be stimulating us - provided there is such a system - to interact with it, more as subjects or agents than as something like animals or objects? Is it looking for us to try to interact with it as equals or with parity?" (When people report getting injured or sick from being in close proximity to UAP, it suggests to me that the phenomenon won't go out of its way to avoid affecting us in a negative manner if we get in their its/way (assuming it even knows that close encounters with UAP are not good for humans). Kind of like how we treat lower lifeforms. If we encounter a wild rabbit crossing the road, many of us will do our best to avoid it, but not if it means damaging our car or ourselves in an accident. It may ruin our day if we hit it, but it won't stop us from driving again in the future. Do NHI have bad days if their tech injures us or makes us sick? I have no clue.) Vallée: "Well, what I saw in the notes you gave me, is she was also asking: Is it a control system because we think it is? And that's a very interesting question. Because we react to the UFO phenomenon, or the UAP phenomenon. And, you know, at this point when I think about what I'm going to do next in this research, if I'm given the the opportunity to live a little longer, I'm not going to go back and write any more computer programs. There are better people to do that now, they have the data, and we're in a different phase now. We're in a whole different system. I have the luxury of doing some experiments I wanted to do for a long time." (Would have liked Scafish to ask him: What types of experiments?) Vallée: "So, if you think you are inside the control system, there are things that you can do. Or, if you think you're inside the simulation, you know, which was a new concept that I initially rejected, and then, you know, Ray's (Kurzweil?) work and others have brought it back to the forefront. And we have to ask that at the same time. Can we test it? How would you test it? Well, if, you know, I'm here in my apartment, and the temperature is constant in this apartment. But outside, I can see it's cold, or I can see the sun is out and it's warm, and how come it's constant here? So this would lead me to think that there is a control system, namely a thermostat, that is somewhere. "So I can start looking around the walls, and if I see dial, I can turn it, or I could start a fire and see what happens, see if the temperature changes. If the temperature doesn't change, then I know I'm inside a control system. So, we can do the same thing with UFOs, but we have to react. We have to, number one, acknowledge that it exists, and number two, we have to react to it."

Joe Murgia

59,089 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce