Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The rare moment in longevity talk is a Harvard professor admitting the study is imperfect and still swallowing the capsule. Sinclair is taking nattokinase because a Chinese cohort of about a thousand people showed carotid plaque and IMT moving in the right direction. Natto is fermented soy eaten by... Bacillus subtilis. The enzyme can break fibrin. He takes about 10,000 fibrinolytic units in the morning, then wants the next carotid ultrasound to keep score. That matters because most supplement talk never names a dose or a readout. IMT is imperfect, but it is a number a clinic can actually take. Short science, so this does not float as folklore: the signal people cite is largely Chen et al., Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022 — open-label, roughly 1,062 adults, 10,800 FU per day for 12 months. A smaller head-to-head used 6,000 FU/day for 26 weeks. Sinclair’s own figure is ~10,000 FU each morning. A separate multi-year carotid RCT at a lower dose did not copy the plaque drop. The enzyme is fibrinolytic, so it is a conversation with a doctor if you already use blood thinners. Food-dose natto is not the same claim as “this melts arteries.” Collecting bottles is easy. Naming the units and asking the vessel wall to answer is the part that still looks like science.show more

Camus

462,920 subscribers

31,090 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

$David Sinclair just revealed one of the biggest studies on nattokinase. A comprehensive Chinese study of 1,067 people found that nattokinase reversed cardiovascular disease by removing up to 95% of arterial plaque in one year. This supplement is an enzyme from fermented soybeans and costs almost nothing. Sinclair has been taking it daily for a couple of years. He measures his carotid artery with ultrasound and says there's no plaque buildup at all. Peter Diamandis takes it too. He believes you need at least 6,000 fibrinolytic units per day to reap the benefits. For context: • Statins cost hundreds per month and come with side effects. • Surgical interventions can cost thousands of dollars Nattokinase costs a fraction of both. Sinclair's caveat: "Do this with the knowledge of your physician." But the data exists. A study of over 1,000 people and up to 95% plaque removal in just 12 months. And the man whose lab is reversing aging takes it every day. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.$

David Sinclair just revealed one of the biggest studies on nattokinase. A comprehensive Chinese study of 1,067 people found that nattokinase reversed cardiovascular disease by removing up to 95% of arterial plaque in one year. This supplement is an enzyme from fermented soybeans and costs almost nothing. Sinclair has been taking it daily for a couple of years. He measures his carotid artery with ultrasound and says there's no plaque buildup at all. Peter Diamandis takes it too. He believes you need at least 6,000 fibrinolytic units per day to reap the benefits. For context: • Statins cost hundreds per month and come with side effects. • Surgical interventions can cost thousands of dollars Nattokinase costs a fraction of both. Sinclair's caveat: "Do this with the knowledge of your physician." But the data exists. A study of over 1,000 people and up to 95% plaque removal in just 12 months. And the man whose lab is reversing aging takes it every day. — David Sinclair (David Sinclair) on Peter Diamandis' (Peter H. Diamandis, MD) Moonshots podcast PS. David Sinclair is speaking at SynBioBeta on May 6th this year, discussing the science of slowing and reversing aging. If longevity is the world you're in, the investors, partners, and scientists shaping this space will be in the room. Grab your ticket in the comments below.

John Cumbers

841,337 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Dr. Ovadia says nattokinase is something he routinely recommends as part of his protocol for patients. It a fibrinolytic agent, meaning it helps the body break down blood clots as they start to form. He points to a trial showing reduced arterial plaque in patients taking it, though that study measured carotid (neck) plaque rather than coronary plaque, which he flags as a caveat. As mentioned below, the trial tested 3,600 units daily (not statistically significant) versus 10,800 units daily (significant plaque reduction), so he typically suggests around 10,000 units a day. He cautions that many supplements are dosed too low or poorly sourced, and that anyone on blood-thinning medication should talk to their doctor first. (h/t Ken D Berry MD & DoctorTro)

Dr. Ovadia says nattokinase is something he routinely recommends as part of his protocol for patients. It a fibrinolytic agent, meaning it helps the body break down blood clots as they start to form. He points to a trial showing reduced arterial plaque in patients taking it, though that study measured carotid (neck) plaque rather than coronary plaque, which he flags as a caveat. As mentioned below, the trial tested 3,600 units daily (not statistically significant) versus 10,800 units daily (significant plaque reduction), so he typically suggests around 10,000 units a day. He cautions that many supplements are dosed too low or poorly sourced, and that anyone on blood-thinning medication should talk to their doctor first. (h/t Ken D Berry MD & DoctorTro)

A Paradise for Parents

115,917 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

David Sinclair says he’s been reversing plaque in his arteries with nattokinase. On Peter Diamandis’ podcast, Sinclair shared that he’s been taking it for years and mentioned a Chinese study with 1,086 people that showed up to 95% plaque reduction in one year at sufficient doses (at least 12 fibrinolytic units daily). He also checks his own carotid arteries with ultrasound and says there’s no buildup. Nattokinase is an enzyme from fermented soybeans that breaks down fibrin. Some human studies show it can help reduce arterial plaque and improve blood flow, but results vary. Larger, high-quality trials are still limited, so it’s considered promising but not definitive. Cardiovascular disease is still the #1 killer. If there are accessible tools that support artery health beyond statins and lifestyle, it’s worth paying attention. Have you heard about nattokinase or tried anything similar for heart health?

David Sinclair says he’s been reversing plaque in his arteries with nattokinase. On Peter Diamandis’ podcast, Sinclair shared that he’s been taking it for years and mentioned a Chinese study with 1,086 people that showed up to 95% plaque reduction in one year at sufficient doses (at least 12 fibrinolytic units daily). He also checks his own carotid arteries with ultrasound and says there’s no buildup. Nattokinase is an enzyme from fermented soybeans that breaks down fibrin. Some human studies show it can help reduce arterial plaque and improve blood flow, but results vary. Larger, high-quality trials are still limited, so it’s considered promising but not definitive. Cardiovascular disease is still the #1 killer. If there are accessible tools that support artery health beyond statins and lifestyle, it’s worth paying attention. Have you heard about nattokinase or tried anything similar for heart health?

Camus

558,620 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Elon Musk reveals the first principles test that exposes whether something is expensive for a real reason or a fake one "A good physics tool is thinking about things in the limit. If you take a particular thing and scale it to a very large number or a very small number, how do things change?" "Let's say you're trying to figure out why a part is expensive. Is it because of something fundamentally foolish we're doing, or because our volume is too low? So you say, what if our volume was a million units a year? Is it still expensive? If it's still expensive at a million units a year, then volume is not the reason" "A common excuse in rockets is, it's expensive because our unit volume is low, and if we were in automotive or consumer electronics our cost would be lower. So let's say you're making a million units a year. Is it still expensive? If the answer is yes, then economies of scale are not the issue"

Elon Musk reveals the first principles test that exposes whether something is expensive for a real reason or a fake one "A good physics tool is thinking about things in the limit. If you take a particular thing and scale it to a very large number or a very small number, how do things change?" "Let's say you're trying to figure out why a part is expensive. Is it because of something fundamentally foolish we're doing, or because our volume is too low? So you say, what if our volume was a million units a year? Is it still expensive? If it's still expensive at a million units a year, then volume is not the reason" "A common excuse in rockets is, it's expensive because our unit volume is low, and if we were in automotive or consumer electronics our cost would be lower. So let's say you're making a million units a year. Is it still expensive? If the answer is yes, then economies of scale are not the issue"

Jaynit

25,361 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

The Most Powerful Part of “The Sound of Silence” Isn’t the Singing. It’s What Happens Between the Words. Dana Winner’s voice is the first thing you notice. Clean. Warm. Held in place. For a minute I listened the way you listen to a good singer: waiting for the next note to land. Then I stopped doing that. The interesting part was not the note. It was the gap after it. That is the odd job this song has always had. It is packed with language and still keeps pointing at the place language does not reach. People talk. People look up. People sit in the same room. Nothing crosses. Winner does not act that idea out. She does not darken the vowel to prove she understands loneliness. She leaves the line where it is and lets it cool. The melody has air around it. The words sit. You can walk into them if you want to. You can also look away. I looked away and landed somewhere private. A message I drafted and never sent. A talk I kept moving to next week. A moment that did come, and I still said the safer thing. That is a quieter kind of isolation than an empty house. You can have company and still fail to get across the few feet between two chairs. Her voice matters because of where it stands. She does not sound swallowed by the quiet. She sounds just outside it, looking in. The sound is beautiful. The thing it is looking at is not. That mismatch is what makes the performance slightly hard to sit with. You come for the tone. The song keeps turning your face toward the cheaper fact: how often we speak and how rarely we arrive. The world around the song has changed. Distance collapsed. A voice can travel farther in a second than it used to travel in a week. None of that fixed the smaller problem. Being reached is not the same as being heard. Being heard is not the same as being taken in. So the song does not survive because it predicted a mute planet. It survives because it still describes a noisy one, full of people missing each other by inches. Sometimes the silence between two people is not empty. It is the sentence neither of them would risk.

The Most Powerful Part of “The Sound of Silence” Isn’t the Singing. It’s What Happens Between the Words. Dana Winner’s voice is the first thing you notice. Clean. Warm. Held in place. For a minute I listened the way you listen to a good singer: waiting for the next note to land. Then I stopped doing that. The interesting part was not the note. It was the gap after it. That is the odd job this song has always had. It is packed with language and still keeps pointing at the place language does not reach. People talk. People look up. People sit in the same room. Nothing crosses. Winner does not act that idea out. She does not darken the vowel to prove she understands loneliness. She leaves the line where it is and lets it cool. The melody has air around it. The words sit. You can walk into them if you want to. You can also look away. I looked away and landed somewhere private. A message I drafted and never sent. A talk I kept moving to next week. A moment that did come, and I still said the safer thing. That is a quieter kind of isolation than an empty house. You can have company and still fail to get across the few feet between two chairs. Her voice matters because of where it stands. She does not sound swallowed by the quiet. She sounds just outside it, looking in. The sound is beautiful. The thing it is looking at is not. That mismatch is what makes the performance slightly hard to sit with. You come for the tone. The song keeps turning your face toward the cheaper fact: how often we speak and how rarely we arrive. The world around the song has changed. Distance collapsed. A voice can travel farther in a second than it used to travel in a week. None of that fixed the smaller problem. Being reached is not the same as being heard. Being heard is not the same as being taken in. So the song does not survive because it predicted a mute planet. It survives because it still describes a noisy one, full of people missing each other by inches. Sometimes the silence between two people is not empty. It is the sentence neither of them would risk.

Emotion & Music

15,311 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Dustin

54,061 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

LOLO

2,230,233 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

It looks like these guys found the entrance in the Antarctic Ocean beyond the ice wall. They are in for the adventure of their lives! I want this to be a place for everyone can join in on the conversation and get it going and asking questions and trying to figure out this great mystery that is perhaps the most profound journey a human being could go on in the modern day because what we're looking for is exploration in a world where we were told everything was already explored but now we know that is not the case and the final frontier is still out there

It looks like these guys found the entrance in the Antarctic Ocean beyond the ice wall. They are in for the adventure of their lives! I want this to be a place for everyone can join in on the conversation and get it going and asking questions and trying to figure out this great mystery that is perhaps the most profound journey a human being could go on in the modern day because what we're looking for is exploration in a world where we were told everything was already explored but now we know that is not the case and the final frontier is still out there

Charley Griffin

13,363 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

A BBC interviewer asked a Nobel physicist the simplest question in the world: why do two magnets push each other apart. He refused to answer it. What he did instead is the best seven minutes on thinking ever filmed. The man is Richard Feynman, at home in 1983, no blackboard, no notes, sitting in an armchair. He does not dodge because he cannot answer. He dodges because he wants you to see what the question is actually asking. So he takes an ordinary sentence, that a woman slipped on the ice and broke her hip, and starts asking why, and every answer opens another why, until the ground gives way. Then he turns it around on the interviewer with a question about ice that sounds trivial and is not. The point he arrives at is the uncomfortable one. Every explanation is only a translation into something you already accept without explanation. Magnets have no such translation. There is nothing more familiar than magnetism to reduce magnetism to, which is why every answer you were given at school was a picture, not a reason. It matters more now than it did in 1983. Any tool will hand you a fluent answer in a second. Knowing which questions actually have a bottom is the part that is still yours. One question. Seven minutes. It is in the video.

Stefan.

2,826,686 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Reality check, and it is not a pleasant one. The only evidence that you are building muscle is that the weight on the bar is going up. A bigger muscle produces more force. That is what the tissue is for. If the load has not moved, it has not grown. Everything else, with what it actually tells you: - The pump (blood and water, gone by lunchtime) - Soreness (damage, and damage competes with growth) - Sweat (thermoregulation) - The mirror (lies twice daily, in both directions) - The scale (water, food, and whatever you drank) - Feeling it in the right place (a sensation, not a signal) - Session length (an hour of nothing is still nothing) - Set count (a tally, and the tissue cannot count) - The programme's name (marketing) - Steps, wearables, readiness scores (a subscription) Open the log. Same lift, same reps, same effort, twelve weeks ago. Now the part nobody wants. When the bar stops moving it is almost never because you did too little. It is fatigue, banked over weeks, quietly capping every set you take. The instinct is to add sets. The answer is to cut them, rest properly, and come back in a fortnight to find the weight up while you did less. Muscle cannot get bigger and stay just as weak. If it has not got stronger, it has not got bigger.

Reality check, and it is not a pleasant one. The only evidence that you are building muscle is that the weight on the bar is going up. A bigger muscle produces more force. That is what the tissue is for. If the load has not moved, it has not grown. Everything else, with what it actually tells you: - The pump (blood and water, gone by lunchtime) - Soreness (damage, and damage competes with growth) - Sweat (thermoregulation) - The mirror (lies twice daily, in both directions) - The scale (water, food, and whatever you drank) - Feeling it in the right place (a sensation, not a signal) - Session length (an hour of nothing is still nothing) - Set count (a tally, and the tissue cannot count) - The programme's name (marketing) - Steps, wearables, readiness scores (a subscription) Open the log. Same lift, same reps, same effort, twelve weeks ago. Now the part nobody wants. When the bar stops moving it is almost never because you did too little. It is fatigue, banked over weeks, quietly capping every set you take. The instinct is to add sets. The answer is to cut them, rest properly, and come back in a fortnight to find the weight up while you did less. Muscle cannot get bigger and stay just as weak. If it has not got stronger, it has not got bigger.

Sama Hoole

208,765 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The dress is quiet. The kit is not. The clip is a young woman on an electronic kit in a small room. That is the setup. The argument is in the playing. Metalcore does not flatter a cautious drummer. The song wants weight in the kick and a grid that does not wobble when the fill arrives. Hansen does not sand the track down to fit a phone video. She lets the chorus take the shoulders and the mouth as well as the wrists. Energy here is not bouncing for the lens. It is committing body weight to a beat that was written to feel like weather. Confidence is easier to fake than timing. A lot of camera drumming sells attitude and hides the feet. This one does the opposite job. The room is ordinary. There is no crowd to lift her. The more useful read is simpler: she trusted the part enough to leave it loud. Covering a band like I Prevail in sandals and a short skirt is also a social bet. The feed will split — skill in one thread, legs in another. She posts anyway. That is not innocence. That is refusing to wait for a more “correct” picture of a metal drummer. Skill is the least glamorous sentence. Hands and feet have to tell different stories at the same time. On rubber pads there is no acoustic wash to hide a sloppy flam or a late crash. If the roll lands and the kick stays even, the work was done before the camera started. The heels are a mechanical handicap. If the pulse still stands, coordination beat the outfit. People will keep watching for the wrong reason and staying for the right one. The hurricane in the song is noise in the head. The hurricane in the clip is a person who decided the noise gets a drum part, not a filter.

The dress is quiet. The kit is not. The clip is a young woman on an electronic kit in a small room. That is the setup. The argument is in the playing. Metalcore does not flatter a cautious drummer. The song wants weight in the kick and a grid that does not wobble when the fill arrives. Hansen does not sand the track down to fit a phone video. She lets the chorus take the shoulders and the mouth as well as the wrists. Energy here is not bouncing for the lens. It is committing body weight to a beat that was written to feel like weather. Confidence is easier to fake than timing. A lot of camera drumming sells attitude and hides the feet. This one does the opposite job. The room is ordinary. There is no crowd to lift her. The more useful read is simpler: she trusted the part enough to leave it loud. Covering a band like I Prevail in sandals and a short skirt is also a social bet. The feed will split — skill in one thread, legs in another. She posts anyway. That is not innocence. That is refusing to wait for a more “correct” picture of a metal drummer. Skill is the least glamorous sentence. Hands and feet have to tell different stories at the same time. On rubber pads there is no acoustic wash to hide a sloppy flam or a late crash. If the roll lands and the kick stays even, the work was done before the camera started. The heels are a mechanical handicap. If the pulse still stands, coordination beat the outfit. People will keep watching for the wrong reason and staying for the right one. The hurricane in the song is noise in the head. The hurricane in the clip is a person who decided the noise gets a drum part, not a filter.

Emotion & Music

25,085 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

People are getting so mad at Shakira for saying this because Meg is with a black man. This is why when we talk about minorities and discrimination, we need to talk about intersectionality too. Woc are not treated the same as the men a lot of the time

People are getting so mad at Shakira for saying this because Meg is with a black man. This is why when we talk about minorities and discrimination, we need to talk about intersectionality too. Woc are not treated the same as the men a lot of the time

Tee ❦love island era❦

553,257 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

When I worked in the White House in 2022, my dad called me and said, “Talk to the man you work for because I can’t fill up my truck.” That man is still saying that today!! So when we talk about Iran, yes, the missiles matter. The nuclear threat matters. The wider regional conflict matters. But that is not how most Americans process this. And in moments like this, the president needs to be a clear communicator. Right now, he is not.

When I worked in the White House in 2022, my dad called me and said, “Talk to the man you work for because I can’t fill up my truck.” That man is still saying that today!! So when we talk about Iran, yes, the missiles matter. The nuclear threat matters. The wider regional conflict matters. But that is not how most Americans process this. And in moments like this, the president needs to be a clear communicator. Right now, he is not.

Yemisi Egbewole

18,184 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 DAY THREE IS WHEN GOVERNMENTS START TO WORRY A protest can be dismissed as a one-off. A second day can be described as an isolated reaction. But when demonstrations continue into a third day and beyond, something changes. The story stops being about the original incident. It becomes a test of public sentiment. A test of political authority. And a test of whether those in power still understand the mood of the country. The real concern for governments is not the number of people on the streets today. It is the possibility that the anger driving them there is spreading faster than the authorities can contain politically. Because if the protests continue, the question is no longer: "Why are people protesting?" The question becomes: "Why are so many people still protesting?" That is when a local crisis can become a national one.

🚨 DAY THREE IS WHEN GOVERNMENTS START TO WORRY A protest can be dismissed as a one-off. A second day can be described as an isolated reaction. But when demonstrations continue into a third day and beyond, something changes. The story stops being about the original incident. It becomes a test of public sentiment. A test of political authority. And a test of whether those in power still understand the mood of the country. The real concern for governments is not the number of people on the streets today. It is the possibility that the anger driving them there is spreading faster than the authorities can contain politically. Because if the protests continue, the question is no longer: "Why are people protesting?" The question becomes: "Why are so many people still protesting?" That is when a local crisis can become a national one.

Jim Ferguson

40,748 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

the docs said the caching is automatic, so you did nothing automatic is where it happens, not whether it happens the cache lives on the machine that built it, and your next request lands wherever the fleet sends it, which is usually not there, so it pays full price for a prefix it already paid to build there is a key that pins a conversation to one machine and it is a single header cached input is fifty cents a million against two dollars you never needed a smaller prompt you needed the request to land in the same place twice

the docs said the caching is automatic, so you did nothing automatic is where it happens, not whether it happens the cache lives on the machine that built it, and your next request lands wherever the fleet sends it, which is usually not there, so it pays full price for a prefix it already paid to build there is a key that pins a conversation to one machine and it is a single header cached input is fifty cents a million against two dollars you never needed a smaller prompt you needed the request to land in the same place twice

Lagosaur

16,892 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

🇺🇸 SHOCKING TRUTH: JOHN THUNE IS NOT YOUR ONLY PROBLEM. THE MATH IS YOUR PROBLEM. I understand the frustration. I feel it too. John Thune sits in the most powerful seat in the Senate and too often it feels like he is running interference against the very agenda the American people voted for. That anger is legitimate. But I want to offer a different way to look at this, because I think we are aiming at the wrong target. Thune is a symptom. The disease is the math. Here is how a Majority Leader actually gets chosen. It is not a public vote. It is not decided by you or me. It is decided by the Republican Senate caucus, meaning every Republican senator votes for who leads them. And right now, MAGA is a minority inside that caucus. That is not an opinion. That is a head count. So when people ask why we cannot get a true MAGA leader in the Senate, the answer is brutally simple. The votes are not there yet. Think about what a slim majority actually means in practice. When you are working with two or three seat margins, a handful of globalist Republicans become kingmakers. They know it. They use it. Five RINOs in a slim majority have more leverage than fifty conservatives in a landslide majority. That is not an accident. That is how they survive. And make no mistake about what a RINO actually is. These are not just old school Republicans who like tax cuts and hate spending. These are globalists. They serve multinational corporate interests that have no loyalty to this country, its workers, or its borders. They oppose fair trade because their masters profit from cheap foreign labor. They oppose border security because multinationals do not see America as a nation. They see it as a market. They just happen to operate here. McConnell built that machine and ran it for decades. His influence is finally fading. That matters more than most people realize. But here is the hard truth. If we replace Thune tomorrow with another leader chosen by the same caucus, we get another Thune with a different face. The globalist bloc inside the Republican Senate conference does not disappear because we change the nameplate on the door. The real win is what is already happening. We have primaried out a number of RINOs this cycle. Real ones. And if those seats hold and the majority grows, the math starts to shift. A ten seat majority is a completely different world than a three seat majority. The leverage these people hold evaporates when the numbers move against them. Do not stop being angry. Channel it into the right fight. Grow the majority. Primary the globalists. And understand that the enemy is not one man in a leadership office. The enemy is a caucus that does not yet reflect the will of the people who sent them there. That is changing. Stay in the fight.

🇺🇸 SHOCKING TRUTH: JOHN THUNE IS NOT YOUR ONLY PROBLEM. THE MATH IS YOUR PROBLEM. I understand the frustration. I feel it too. John Thune sits in the most powerful seat in the Senate and too often it feels like he is running interference against the very agenda the American people voted for. That anger is legitimate. But I want to offer a different way to look at this, because I think we are aiming at the wrong target. Thune is a symptom. The disease is the math. Here is how a Majority Leader actually gets chosen. It is not a public vote. It is not decided by you or me. It is decided by the Republican Senate caucus, meaning every Republican senator votes for who leads them. And right now, MAGA is a minority inside that caucus. That is not an opinion. That is a head count. So when people ask why we cannot get a true MAGA leader in the Senate, the answer is brutally simple. The votes are not there yet. Think about what a slim majority actually means in practice. When you are working with two or three seat margins, a handful of globalist Republicans become kingmakers. They know it. They use it. Five RINOs in a slim majority have more leverage than fifty conservatives in a landslide majority. That is not an accident. That is how they survive. And make no mistake about what a RINO actually is. These are not just old school Republicans who like tax cuts and hate spending. These are globalists. They serve multinational corporate interests that have no loyalty to this country, its workers, or its borders. They oppose fair trade because their masters profit from cheap foreign labor. They oppose border security because multinationals do not see America as a nation. They see it as a market. They just happen to operate here. McConnell built that machine and ran it for decades. His influence is finally fading. That matters more than most people realize. But here is the hard truth. If we replace Thune tomorrow with another leader chosen by the same caucus, we get another Thune with a different face. The globalist bloc inside the Republican Senate conference does not disappear because we change the nameplate on the door. The real win is what is already happening. We have primaried out a number of RINOs this cycle. Real ones. And if those seats hold and the majority grows, the math starts to shift. A ten seat majority is a completely different world than a three seat majority. The leverage these people hold evaporates when the numbers move against them. Do not stop being angry. Channel it into the right fight. Grow the majority. Primary the globalists. And understand that the enemy is not one man in a leadership office. The enemy is a caucus that does not yet reflect the will of the people who sent them there. That is changing. Stay in the fight.

Bill Mitchell

47,218 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

SMITH: "Many of the people who are in [PM Carney's] caucus still hold on to the same views that they have for the last 10 years. That Alberta is a problem, our economic wealth is a problem, developing it is a problem, so keep it in the ground. And that is not going to happen."

SMITH: "Many of the people who are in [PM Carney's] caucus still hold on to the same views that they have for the last 10 years. That Alberta is a problem, our economic wealth is a problem, developing it is a problem, so keep it in the ground. And that is not going to happen."

Scott Robertson

111,140 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Culture is not a list of values, literary works, or costumes. Culture is a story that a people tell themselves about themselves in their territory across generations. It is their inheritance, whether they like it or not. If the people disappear, so does the culture. You cannot swap those people out for others and keep their culture, just as you cannot replace the photographs of children on their mother's mantelpiece and claim that the family remains the same.

Culture is not a list of values, literary works, or costumes. Culture is a story that a people tell themselves about themselves in their territory across generations. It is their inheritance, whether they like it or not. If the people disappear, so does the culture. You cannot swap those people out for others and keep their culture, just as you cannot replace the photographs of children on their mother's mantelpiece and claim that the family remains the same.

Connor Tomlinson

34,643 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This video is not just uncomfortable. It is revealing. A non Hindu can walk into a space that a Hindu, born in the same land, is told he cannot enter. Not because of crime. Not because of character. Because of caste. That is the system they still defend while lecturing the world about equality. Ask the question they do not like. How is an outsider acceptable, but a fellow Hindu is pollution? What kind of civilisation ranks its own people like this and then calls itself a moral teacher? This is why the Two Nation Theory was not a slogan. It was a diagnosis. Jinnah saw a mindset that could not treat citizens as equal human beings. He built a state so we would not have to live under that hierarchy. Thank Quaid e Azam for Pakistan. Thank him for a homeland where your worth is not decided by the accident of birth, and where we are not chained to a system that humiliates its own based on religion or caste. Pakistan Zindabad. 🇵🇰

This video is not just uncomfortable. It is revealing. A non Hindu can walk into a space that a Hindu, born in the same land, is told he cannot enter. Not because of crime. Not because of character. Because of caste. That is the system they still defend while lecturing the world about equality. Ask the question they do not like. How is an outsider acceptable, but a fellow Hindu is pollution? What kind of civilisation ranks its own people like this and then calls itself a moral teacher? This is why the Two Nation Theory was not a slogan. It was a diagnosis. Jinnah saw a mindset that could not treat citizens as equal human beings. He built a state so we would not have to live under that hierarchy. Thank Quaid e Azam for Pakistan. Thank him for a homeland where your worth is not decided by the accident of birth, and where we are not chained to a system that humiliates its own based on religion or caste. Pakistan Zindabad. 🇵🇰

Rubab

884,601 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce