正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The Second Amendment was not written in isolation. It sits on the same foundation as every other right. You do not get free speech if the state decides who may speak. You do not get due process if the state decides who is dangerous. You do not get bodily... autonomy if the state decides what is “reasonable.” When one amendment is treated as optional, the rest follow. History is clear. Governments do not restrain themselves. They are restrained when they hit resistance. The Constitution is a package deal. You either defend all of it, or you lose it piece by piece. Rights do not exist because the government allows them. Rights exist because the people already had them. John “TIG” Tiegen Semper Fishow more

John “TIG” Tiegen

61,234 subscribers

44,452 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“This war in Congo, people have tried to make it Rwanda’s war, but it is not Rwanda’s war. Rwanda did not start this war; rather, what those who started it wanted, is what we are fighting against. And that is what I am going to explain to you. This war has its origins in the history I just mentioned. Some people who are called Rwandans found themselves on the other side of the borders that define Rwanda today. It was not Rwanda that took them there. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Kisoro in Uganda. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Masisi, Rutshuru, and other places. Rwanda did not take them there. Now, for those who found themselves there, if the governments of those countries want to tell them, ‘Get up and go back to where you belong, to Rwanda,’ if that is their decision, then they should expel them along with the land they live on, and remain with only what belongs to them. If you claim to act in truth or seek peace, as all people do, then you must respect people’s rights. Without a doubt, when you deny people their rights, they will fight for them, that is the fire I was talking about. And when you drag Rwandans into this situation and blame Rwanda because these other countries do not want the people who are there, what do you expect us to do? We will stand up for ourselves .” President Kagame | #KwegeraAbaturage

“This war in Congo, people have tried to make it Rwanda’s war, but it is not Rwanda’s war. Rwanda did not start this war; rather, what those who started it wanted, is what we are fighting against. And that is what I am going to explain to you. This war has its origins in the history I just mentioned. Some people who are called Rwandans found themselves on the other side of the borders that define Rwanda today. It was not Rwanda that took them there. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Kisoro in Uganda. Rwanda did not move Rwandans to Masisi, Rutshuru, and other places. Rwanda did not take them there. Now, for those who found themselves there, if the governments of those countries want to tell them, ‘Get up and go back to where you belong, to Rwanda,’ if that is their decision, then they should expel them along with the land they live on, and remain with only what belongs to them. If you claim to act in truth or seek peace, as all people do, then you must respect people’s rights. Without a doubt, when you deny people their rights, they will fight for them, that is the fire I was talking about. And when you drag Rwandans into this situation and blame Rwanda because these other countries do not want the people who are there, what do you expect us to do? We will stand up for ourselves .” President Kagame | #KwegeraAbaturage

Presidency | Rwanda

180,348 次观看 • 1 年前

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan: " The Constitution is not a buffet. You don't get to pick the parts you like and ignore the rest. You don't get to swear an oath to defend it and then weaponize the government against it. The First Amendment is not optional."

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan: " The Constitution is not a buffet. You don't get to pick the parts you like and ignore the rest. You don't get to swear an oath to defend it and then weaponize the government against it. The First Amendment is not optional."

Home of the Brave

15,194 次观看 • 4 个月前

The First and Second amendment do not exist in a vacuum. You do not forfeit one by exercising the other. Regardless of swift changes in the White House, DOJ or the legislature, these rights must be held as absolute. "An armed people is a people whose assembly the government MUST take seriously, a disarmed people protest at the government's pleasure." -Dudley Brown

The First and Second amendment do not exist in a vacuum. You do not forfeit one by exercising the other. Regardless of swift changes in the White House, DOJ or the legislature, these rights must be held as absolute. "An armed people is a people whose assembly the government MUST take seriously, a disarmed people protest at the government's pleasure." -Dudley Brown

National Association for Gun Rights

33,106 次观看 • 2 个月前

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

📁 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, says the problem with AI is not if it works. It is what happens when it does. Because curing disease is not enough. The real question is: what do you do when you are no longer needed?

Jon Hernandez

49,677 次观看 • 2 个月前

If there is a video on what NOT to do when you get pulled over by the cops, this is it. The sense of entitlement is astounding.

If there is a video on what NOT to do when you get pulled over by the cops, this is it. The sense of entitlement is astounding.

Sadie

294,415 次观看 • 2 个月前

There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who do not accept the state of Israel and Zionism, but they never talk about it because the mainstream media is under the control of Zionists. What is Judaism? Its not an ethnicity or culture as Zionists would have you believe. Its a religion, plain & simple. "The Jewish people have no state! They could call themselves Herzlston, or whatever they want, but they are not "Israel" and they are not the "State of the Jews"! Judaism is a religion NOT a Nationality!

There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who do not accept the state of Israel and Zionism, but they never talk about it because the mainstream media is under the control of Zionists. What is Judaism? Its not an ethnicity or culture as Zionists would have you believe. Its a religion, plain & simple. "The Jewish people have no state! They could call themselves Herzlston, or whatever they want, but they are not "Israel" and they are not the "State of the Jews"! Judaism is a religion NOT a Nationality!

Voice of Rabbis

217,253 次观看 • 2 年前

If the government wants to surveil American citizens, it must do so legally. The Fourth Amendment is not optional, and it cannot be bypassed for the sake of convenience. If we do not have our constitutional rights, we have nothing at all.

If the government wants to surveil American citizens, it must do so legally. The Fourth Amendment is not optional, and it cannot be bypassed for the sake of convenience. If we do not have our constitutional rights, we have nothing at all.

Rep. Keith Self

20,521 次观看 • 14 天前

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNDER THREAT IN CANADA A Western government is now openly talking about restricting access to foreign platforms because citizens are speaking in ways the authorities don’t like. When governments decide which opinions are acceptable… when they label dissent as “harm”… when they frame speech itself as a security threat… That is not protection. That is control. The moment a state claims the power to decide what its population is allowed to hear, read, or say — democracy itself is weakened. Citizens raising concerns about immigration, culture, or national identity are not criminals. They are participants in public debate. Free societies do not silence disagreement. They tolerate it — even when it is uncomfortable. Because once censorship begins, it never stays limited to one issue. The real question now is simple: Who decides what is “acceptable speech” — the people, or the government?

🚨 FREE SPEECH UNDER THREAT IN CANADA A Western government is now openly talking about restricting access to foreign platforms because citizens are speaking in ways the authorities don’t like. When governments decide which opinions are acceptable… when they label dissent as “harm”… when they frame speech itself as a security threat… That is not protection. That is control. The moment a state claims the power to decide what its population is allowed to hear, read, or say — democracy itself is weakened. Citizens raising concerns about immigration, culture, or national identity are not criminals. They are participants in public debate. Free societies do not silence disagreement. They tolerate it — even when it is uncomfortable. Because once censorship begins, it never stays limited to one issue. The real question now is simple: Who decides what is “acceptable speech” — the people, or the government?

Jim Ferguson

147,021 次观看 • 4 个月前

David Frum on Jimmy Kimmel: "This is not cancel culture because it's not culture. It's state repression. It's an order from the government. Here is the script, you must read, if you do not read it, you will be taken off the air."

David Frum on Jimmy Kimmel: "This is not cancel culture because it's not culture. It's state repression. It's an order from the government. Here is the script, you must read, if you do not read it, you will be taken off the air."

Blue Georgia

1,853,212 次观看 • 9 个月前

Ben Shapiro: “I think the Senate filibuster is actually quite important because if you do not have the Senate filibuster, what you end up with is a country that is already pendulumingside to side, doing so even farther with 51 votes in the Senate.” “Ramming through massive changes to the system of government itself... The argument President Trump has used is Democrats will do it anyway when they get the first opportunity. So we should go ahead and do it.” “I’m not sure that’s true... [What should happen] is a constitutional amendment to enshrine the filibuster in the Constitution.”

Ben Shapiro: “I think the Senate filibuster is actually quite important because if you do not have the Senate filibuster, what you end up with is a country that is already pendulumingside to side, doing so even farther with 51 votes in the Senate.” “Ramming through massive changes to the system of government itself... The argument President Trump has used is Democrats will do it anyway when they get the first opportunity. So we should go ahead and do it.” “I’m not sure that’s true... [What should happen] is a constitutional amendment to enshrine the filibuster in the Constitution.”

RedWave Press

553,369 次观看 • 7 个月前

“Do you MAGA people not notice that he is going against the Constitution or do you just not care?” He hasn’t gone against the Constitution, Karen.. Get over it!!

“Do you MAGA people not notice that he is going against the Constitution or do you just not care?” He hasn’t gone against the Constitution, Karen.. Get over it!!

KᗴᒪᒪᗴY ✰

170,276 次观看 • 1 年前

YIKES! "I believe in the 2nd amendment. Is abortion not a form of self-defense? If something is attacking your body or your right to live, do you not have a right to defend yourself and get rid of it?" 🤮

Sensitive content

YIKES! "I believe in the 2nd amendment. Is abortion not a form of self-defense? If something is attacking your body or your right to live, do you not have a right to defend yourself and get rid of it?" 🤮

Kaitlin Bennett

81,206 次观看 • 1 年前

Goldman on Abrego Garcia: "If he had due process he would not have been removed. Then they would've had to go through the process of proving it. And this is why due process matters -- so you don't make mistakes like this. And that you do have a neutral arbiter that decides the law. Not the executive branch."

Goldman on Abrego Garcia: "If he had due process he would not have been removed. Then they would've had to go through the process of proving it. And this is why due process matters -- so you don't make mistakes like this. And that you do have a neutral arbiter that decides the law. Not the executive branch."

Aaron Rupar

305,296 次观看 • 1 年前

You do not know what is behind doors you have never opened. More importantly, You do not know WHO is behind those doors. The exceptional exist. Find them:

You do not know what is behind doors you have never opened. More importantly, You do not know WHO is behind those doors. The exceptional exist. Find them:

THE WAR ROOM

135,732 次观看 • 11 个月前

“She is not his daughter” Biracial children: Simply do not exist. Her mother being white and blonde: I simply do not exist. Her older brother, who has the same mother, also having vitiligo, which was the same condition as the father: I simply do not exist. Honestly, this is so 2016… get over it and be smarter. And Michael never had to prove anything to any of you anyway, so fuck it.

“She is not his daughter” Biracial children: Simply do not exist. Her mother being white and blonde: I simply do not exist. Her older brother, who has the same mother, also having vitiligo, which was the same condition as the father: I simply do not exist. Honestly, this is so 2016… get over it and be smarter. And Michael never had to prove anything to any of you anyway, so fuck it.

Michael Jackson Friends | Fan Account

72,754 次观看 • 4 个月前

THE EGYPTIAN MYSTERY SCHOOLS Do you understand the origins of why the world is the way it is today? Do you understand it's purpose? It's beginnings? It's goal? Do you even know who your enemy is? Because if you do not even know your enemy, you cannot properly fight them.

THE EGYPTIAN MYSTERY SCHOOLS Do you understand the origins of why the world is the way it is today? Do you understand it's purpose? It's beginnings? It's goal? Do you even know who your enemy is? Because if you do not even know your enemy, you cannot properly fight them.

Redpill Drifter

17,614 次观看 • 9 个月前