Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The U.S. Army may have deployed its Dark Eagle Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) to Guam. During the Valiant Shield exercise on June 6, troops from the 7th Infantry Division (Multi-Domain Command - Pacific) conducted Dark Eagle training. The U.S. Army did not reveal the location, but photos, Adm. Samuel...

34,121 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇷🇺 Strategic Asymmetry: Russia’s Countermove on INF Missiles by Elena Panina Russia has officially announced that it is abandoning the self-imposed restrictions under the moratorium on the deployment of intermediate and shorter-range missiles (INF), citing the actions of the United States, which has long stationed similar missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), thereby disrupting the status quo. Notably, this is the first time Russia has explicitly stated that the threat from U.S. INF missiles comes not only from Europe but also from the APR. ▪️ On the surface, Moscow’s lifting of the INF moratorium appears to be nothing more than a symmetrical response to Washington’s escalation. But on a deeper level, it is a move to seize the initiative disguised as a reactive measure. Russia is not just “responding”—it is crafting a new strategic framework in the absence of international constraints. And it now has, among other assets, the serial production of the Oreshnik missile system. Why the emphasis on the APR in the Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement, given that Russia lacks an extensive network of military bases there? This is where things get interesting. Russia currently cannot project power in the APR the way the U.S. does by deploying missiles in Guam, the Philippines, and Australia. But Russia has the Far East—from where it can reach Guam, Alaska, the U.S. Pacific coast, not to mention South Korea and Japan. Moreover, Russia now has a direct military ally in the region—North Korea—and the recent visits of high-ranking Russian military officials to Pyongyang were clearly not coincidental. Russia can operate through North Korea with relative freedom, including under the “sovereign proxy” model, much like the U.S. does with Israel in the Middle East. And let’s not forget the Chinese factor. ▪️ Thus, this marks a strategic paradigm shift. If Moscow previously relied on treaties and “playing by the rules,” it is now betting on unpredictability, interconnected fronts, and a balance of threats. For Europe, this creates at least two key flashpoints—Kaliningrad and Crimea. For U.S. allies in the Far East, there’s North Korea. And the U.S. itself now has to juggle between two fronts—or even three, if we include the Middle East. The Pentagon’s need to respond has multiplied, along with the growing complexity of strategic planning: the U.S. will now have to deploy missile defense systems worldwide—all while facing shortages of missiles and defense systems. This is the power of asymmetric strategy: you don’t need to be stronger, you just need to be less predictable and threaten from unexpected directions.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

16,164 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад