Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

There isn't a stronger Second Amendment champion in Congress than Thomas Massie ✅ Chairs the House Second Amendment Caucus ✅ Introduced the Real National Constitutional Carry Act ✅ Authored legislation to repeal federal gun-free school zones ✅ Passed a bill demanding NICS transparency through the House ✅ Fought back...

gunrights's profile picture

National Association for Gun Rights

128,714 subscribers

81,911 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 BREAKING: The House of Representatives has passed the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act — a bill reversing the unconstitutional and troubling policy that stripped veterans of their right to keep and bear arms without due process, simply because they have been assigned a fiduciary to help manage their Veterans Affairs benefits that they’ve earned through their service to our nation. “For nearly 30 years, the Department of Veterans Affairs has stripped law-abiding veterans of their Second Amendment rights simply for needing assistance navigating their VA benefits,” said John Commerford, Executive Director of NRA-ILA. “Thanks to the strong leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson, Chairman Rep. Mike Bost, and House Republicans, the House has passed H.R. 1041, the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act, to restore the constitutional rights of those who served our great country. While we celebrate this significant victory, our work is far from over. Every NRA member and law-abiding gun owner must immediately contact their U.S. Senators and demand they pass this critical legislation and send it to President Donald J. Trump’s desk without delay.” Call your U.S. Senators and urge them to VOTE YES on this critical piece of legislation: (202)-224-3121
0:58

🚨 BREAKING: The House of Representatives has passed the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act — a bill reversing the unconstitutional and troubling policy that stripped veterans of their right to keep and bear arms without due process, simply because they have been assigned a fiduciary to help manage their Veterans Affairs benefits that they’ve earned through their service to our nation. “For nearly 30 years, the Department of Veterans Affairs has stripped law-abiding veterans of their Second Amendment rights simply for needing assistance navigating their VA benefits,” said John Commerford, Executive Director of NRA-ILA. “Thanks to the strong leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson, Chairman Rep. Mike Bost, and House Republicans, the House has passed H.R. 1041, the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act, to restore the constitutional rights of those who served our great country. While we celebrate this significant victory, our work is far from over. Every NRA member and law-abiding gun owner must immediately contact their U.S. Senators and demand they pass this critical legislation and send it to President Donald J. Trump’s desk without delay.” Call your U.S. Senators and urge them to VOTE YES on this critical piece of legislation: (202)-224-3121

NRA

21,998 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Thomas Massie has been a hero, a mentor, and a supporter to me since I was very young. He’s been a champion for the America First cause, and a thorn in the side of big government for as long as I can remember. For that reason, he has my complete support. Thomas Massie's commitment to the Constitution and the principles of liberty is unmatched. His proven track record in Congress speaks volumes, and has yielded him the top scores from organizations like Turning Point, Gun Owners of America, and the New American Freedom Index. He consistently fights against government overreach and advocates for individual freedom, limited government, and fiscal responsibility. In 2020, Massie stood alone in Congress to object to the funding of COVID Lockdowns. When Andy Beshear received that funding, Beshear tried to jail me for going to church. I sued Beshear and won, but Thomas Massie had my back the entire time. That's the kind of unwavering commitment to principles we need in Frankfort and Washington DC! Congressman Massie continues to fight for our rights and fiscal sanity. When President Trump announced his support for abolishing taxes on tips and overtime pay, Thomas Massie introduced a bill to do just that. Thomas Massie forced a vote, exposing the swamp, on eliminating the $5 billion dollars per year the federal government spends on welfare for refugees - which is directly tied to the Somali fraud we see in Minnesota. Thomas Massie is also the sponsor of Nationwide Constitutional Carry, a bill we BADLY need to restore the Second Amendment. Thomas Massie continues to hold true to the America First Principles that are essential to Make America Great Again. Thomas Massie is the real deal, and I'm honored to endorse him.
6:28

Thomas Massie has been a hero, a mentor, and a supporter to me since I was very young. He’s been a champion for the America First cause, and a thorn in the side of big government for as long as I can remember. For that reason, he has my complete support. Thomas Massie's commitment to the Constitution and the principles of liberty is unmatched. His proven track record in Congress speaks volumes, and has yielded him the top scores from organizations like Turning Point, Gun Owners of America, and the New American Freedom Index. He consistently fights against government overreach and advocates for individual freedom, limited government, and fiscal responsibility. In 2020, Massie stood alone in Congress to object to the funding of COVID Lockdowns. When Andy Beshear received that funding, Beshear tried to jail me for going to church. I sued Beshear and won, but Thomas Massie had my back the entire time. That's the kind of unwavering commitment to principles we need in Frankfort and Washington DC! Congressman Massie continues to fight for our rights and fiscal sanity. When President Trump announced his support for abolishing taxes on tips and overtime pay, Thomas Massie introduced a bill to do just that. Thomas Massie forced a vote, exposing the swamp, on eliminating the $5 billion dollars per year the federal government spends on welfare for refugees - which is directly tied to the Somali fraud we see in Minnesota. Thomas Massie is also the sponsor of Nationwide Constitutional Carry, a bill we BADLY need to restore the Second Amendment. Thomas Massie continues to hold true to the America First Principles that are essential to Make America Great Again. Thomas Massie is the real deal, and I'm honored to endorse him.

TJ Roberts

74,991 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

WATCH: Joey Jones blasts the “useless” National Firearms Act for not making us safer and he highlights how the One Big Beautiful Bill is a major win for the Second Amendment: “It also repealed a $200 tax stamp on NFA weapons, which are basically suppressors short barreled rifles, and just so people at home that aren't as active in Second Amendment understand, this is a 1934 law specifically designed towards the tommy gun of the mobs at the time. It's been around for 91 years. It's basically useless as far as making us safer. And for 91 years, not one Republican President, not one Republican Congress, could do anything with it. And in this bill, President Trump got through the narrowest margin of the Senate and the House, they repealed the tax. There's still a registry and a process that is unconstitutional and needs to be repealed, but through reconciliation, the tax is as much as they can get done. And I'm telling you, in such a divided Congress where guns sometimes become a hot topic to get any movement whatsoever towards the Second Amendment at the federal level, bravo.”
0:55

WATCH: Joey Jones blasts the “useless” National Firearms Act for not making us safer and he highlights how the One Big Beautiful Bill is a major win for the Second Amendment: “It also repealed a $200 tax stamp on NFA weapons, which are basically suppressors short barreled rifles, and just so people at home that aren't as active in Second Amendment understand, this is a 1934 law specifically designed towards the tommy gun of the mobs at the time. It's been around for 91 years. It's basically useless as far as making us safer. And for 91 years, not one Republican President, not one Republican Congress, could do anything with it. And in this bill, President Trump got through the narrowest margin of the Senate and the House, they repealed the tax. There's still a registry and a process that is unconstitutional and needs to be repealed, but through reconciliation, the tax is as much as they can get done. And I'm telling you, in such a divided Congress where guns sometimes become a hot topic to get any movement whatsoever towards the Second Amendment at the federal level, bravo.”

Steve Guest

33,518 просмотров • 1 год назад

Speaker Johnson is 100% correct: ⤵️ ✅ “The Second Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution.” ✅ “There’s no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment [like suppressors].” ✅ “We had the votes to do it, and I think it was a long time overdue.” ✅ “I think we have to protect the fundamental freedoms of the American people.” ✅ “And there’s no rationale. The government should not be making money on something that you have a fundamental and inalienable right to.” Next, GOA is calling on the Senate to also eliminate the taxation & registration of short barreled firearms! 🇺🇸
0:43

Speaker Johnson is 100% correct: ⤵️ ✅ “The Second Amendment is a critical freedom in the Constitution.” ✅ “There’s no real rationale for adding taxes on these pieces of equipment [like suppressors].” ✅ “We had the votes to do it, and I think it was a long time overdue.” ✅ “I think we have to protect the fundamental freedoms of the American people.” ✅ “And there’s no rationale. The government should not be making money on something that you have a fundamental and inalienable right to.” Next, GOA is calling on the Senate to also eliminate the taxation & registration of short barreled firearms! 🇺🇸

Gun Owners of America

35,988 просмотров • 1 год назад

Our amendment on Violet's Law making it into the House-passed Farm Bill is a win for animal rights across the country. Dogs, cats, primates, hamsters, guinea pigs, and rabbits used in government-funded labs will no longer be put down when their time there is done. They will be rehomed and given the second chance they deserve. Taxpayer dollars should never fund a death sentence for innocent animals.
0:38

Our amendment on Violet's Law making it into the House-passed Farm Bill is a win for animal rights across the country. Dogs, cats, primates, hamsters, guinea pigs, and rabbits used in government-funded labs will no longer be put down when their time there is done. They will be rehomed and given the second chance they deserve. Taxpayer dollars should never fund a death sentence for innocent animals.

Rep. Nancy Mace

13,115 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Thomas Massie just declared: “Americans are under attack.” Monsanto is “attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, and the courts.” “They want get-out-of-court free cards.” “My colleague, Chellie Pingree and I … have offered legislation called the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.” “But it shouldn’t even be necessary.” “We haven’t repealed the Tenth Amendment.” “We haven’t repealed the Seventh Amendment, your right to a jury trial.” “We haven't repealed the First Amendment, the right of people to say what’s in a product.” “But those three elements of the Bill of Rights are in jeopardy.” “The Supreme Court today, are they gonna gag state judges?” “Are they gonna disband state juries?” “Are they going to shutter the state courts where justice should be served?” “They’re proposing that nobody gets any justice.” “This is regulatory capture.” “It is corrupt.” “The White House Chief of Staff worked for a lobbying firm that accepted money from Monsanto-Bayer.” “That is why we … are fighting the federal government, and especially the executive branch.” The People vs. Poison Rally is happening right now in front of the Supreme Court to fight back against Monsanto’s war on our right to sue them for poisoning us with pesticide. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress
2:10

Thomas Massie just declared: “Americans are under attack.” Monsanto is “attacking our executive branch, our legislative branch at the state level, our legislative branch here in Washington, and the courts.” “They want get-out-of-court free cards.” “My colleague, Chellie Pingree and I … have offered legislation called the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.” “But it shouldn’t even be necessary.” “We haven’t repealed the Tenth Amendment.” “We haven’t repealed the Seventh Amendment, your right to a jury trial.” “We haven't repealed the First Amendment, the right of people to say what’s in a product.” “But those three elements of the Bill of Rights are in jeopardy.” “The Supreme Court today, are they gonna gag state judges?” “Are they gonna disband state juries?” “Are they going to shutter the state courts where justice should be served?” “They’re proposing that nobody gets any justice.” “This is regulatory capture.” “It is corrupt.” “The White House Chief of Staff worked for a lobbying firm that accepted money from Monsanto-Bayer.” “That is why we … are fighting the federal government, and especially the executive branch.” The People vs. Poison Rally is happening right now in front of the Supreme Court to fight back against Monsanto’s war on our right to sue them for poisoning us with pesticide. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

72,111 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Thomas Massie and Lauren Boebert just declared war on the mass surveillance state. “FISA 702 is just the tip of the iceberg … ” “There have been so many erosions of our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.” “The Bank Secrecy Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Patriot Act … all of them created so-called loopholes in the Constitution.” “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act … is used to go after Americans.” “I’ve been in a SCIF last week where I saw two secret rulings … of how the government has created additional loopholes to spy on you that I’m not even allowed to tell you.” “And finally, the third-party doctrine.” “It’s based on a ruling of the Supreme Court … I think it was a bad ruling, but it’s been expanded in its interpretation to include things like doctor’s appointment records, bank records, phone records … Flock cameras.” “Imagine … that you turn AI loose on these databases.” “Now, there’s virtually nothing the government can’t know about you without a warrant.” “That is why we’ve created … the Surveillance Accountability Act.” “It closes these loopholes that I’ve explained.” “And more importantly, it creates a private right of action.” “It’s almost impossible to sue federal government employees if they infringe on your constitutional rights.” “The second half of this bill gives you the right to sue the government employee.” “If they infringe on your constitutional rights, they could be privately and personally sued for that.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress Lauren Boebert
3:38

Thomas Massie and Lauren Boebert just declared war on the mass surveillance state. “FISA 702 is just the tip of the iceberg … ” “There have been so many erosions of our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.” “The Bank Secrecy Act, the Right to Financial Privacy Act, the Patriot Act … all of them created so-called loopholes in the Constitution.” “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act … is used to go after Americans.” “I’ve been in a SCIF last week where I saw two secret rulings … of how the government has created additional loopholes to spy on you that I’m not even allowed to tell you.” “And finally, the third-party doctrine.” “It’s based on a ruling of the Supreme Court … I think it was a bad ruling, but it’s been expanded in its interpretation to include things like doctor’s appointment records, bank records, phone records … Flock cameras.” “Imagine … that you turn AI loose on these databases.” “Now, there’s virtually nothing the government can’t know about you without a warrant.” “That is why we’ve created … the Surveillance Accountability Act.” “It closes these loopholes that I’ve explained.” “And more importantly, it creates a private right of action.” “It’s almost impossible to sue federal government employees if they infringe on your constitutional rights.” “The second half of this bill gives you the right to sue the government employee.” “If they infringe on your constitutional rights, they could be privately and personally sued for that.” Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress Lauren Boebert

Holden Culotta

57,625 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The Second Amendment is quintessential to the American story. There isn’t a United States without arms, there isn’t an end to the Civil War without arms. There isn’t any meaningful resistance to the horrors of the Jim Crow era without Southern Blacks being armed against tyrannical local and state governments, despite anti-2A laws to disarm them. The irony is some of those same laws have been cited today by states such as Hawaii and North Carolina to justify firearm restrictions. Some of the most consequential moments in American history have involved firearms in some capacity. It’s a rich part of our history that shouldn’t be infringed. Despite the statistical fact that law-abiding gun owners rarely ever commit firearms related offenses, despite the fact that Americans of all backgrounds enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment for a multitude of purposes, anti-Second Amendment political leaders like the governor in my state of Virginia continue restricting the rights of Virginians under the guise of public safety. If the governor and her Democratic majority truly want to address public safety, they should focus on improving the education in underserved areas, focus on expanding economic opportunities that put men to work, providing a mentorship pipeline for young men, and incentivizing stronger family units. All of those efforts would produce far better outcomes in reducing crime than violating the rights of law-abiding gun owners. So we’ll continue to enjoy this right on the range, at shooting competitions, while hunting as we challenge the state in court for its obvious violation of the second amendment. The following groups need the support of gun owners as lawsuits are extremely costly: SAF, NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights,vcdl.org, Firearms Policy Coalition, NSSF—The Firearm Industry Trade Association
1:24

The Second Amendment is quintessential to the American story. There isn’t a United States without arms, there isn’t an end to the Civil War without arms. There isn’t any meaningful resistance to the horrors of the Jim Crow era without Southern Blacks being armed against tyrannical local and state governments, despite anti-2A laws to disarm them. The irony is some of those same laws have been cited today by states such as Hawaii and North Carolina to justify firearm restrictions. Some of the most consequential moments in American history have involved firearms in some capacity. It’s a rich part of our history that shouldn’t be infringed. Despite the statistical fact that law-abiding gun owners rarely ever commit firearms related offenses, despite the fact that Americans of all backgrounds enjoy the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment for a multitude of purposes, anti-Second Amendment political leaders like the governor in my state of Virginia continue restricting the rights of Virginians under the guise of public safety. If the governor and her Democratic majority truly want to address public safety, they should focus on improving the education in underserved areas, focus on expanding economic opportunities that put men to work, providing a mentorship pipeline for young men, and incentivizing stronger family units. All of those efforts would produce far better outcomes in reducing crime than violating the rights of law-abiding gun owners. So we’ll continue to enjoy this right on the range, at shooting competitions, while hunting as we challenge the state in court for its obvious violation of the second amendment. The following groups need the support of gun owners as lawsuits are extremely costly: SAF, NRA, Gun Owners of America, National Association for Gun Rights,vcdl.org, Firearms Policy Coalition, NSSF—The Firearm Industry Trade Association

Shermichael Singleton

14,702 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

When I was in high school, then-Senator Joe Biden was responsible for gun free school zones, but a student still brought guns to my school and we were put on lock down. We should be protecting our kids the same way Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and so many of our politicians are protected every single day. We need more good guys with guns and to protect our Second Amendment.
1:25

When I was in high school, then-Senator Joe Biden was responsible for gun free school zones, but a student still brought guns to my school and we were put on lock down. We should be protecting our kids the same way Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and so many of our politicians are protected every single day. We need more good guys with guns and to protect our Second Amendment.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

226,113 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Trump called for a 1 year in prison if someone burns the American flag earlier today at Fort Bragg, NC. *in almost every circumstance* where an American flag is burned in protest multiple crimes are already being committed but the people who burn the flag are almost never prosecuted for those crimes. That could likely be fixed in many cases with the DOJ if they were directed to prosecute such cases. This would also be a clear violation of the 1st Amendment unless he's calling for a Constitutional amendment and maybe he is. But, the 2nd, 4th, 10th, & 14th amendments (probably more but those jump to the front of my mind while typing this) have already been turned into second class rights that are regularly trampled on by the federal government. We don't need to add the 1st amendment to that list IMO. I obviously don't like to see our flag be burned but I also believe the 1st amendment is pretty clear on this.
0:50

President Trump called for a 1 year in prison if someone burns the American flag earlier today at Fort Bragg, NC. *in almost every circumstance* where an American flag is burned in protest multiple crimes are already being committed but the people who burn the flag are almost never prosecuted for those crimes. That could likely be fixed in many cases with the DOJ if they were directed to prosecute such cases. This would also be a clear violation of the 1st Amendment unless he's calling for a Constitutional amendment and maybe he is. But, the 2nd, 4th, 10th, & 14th amendments (probably more but those jump to the front of my mind while typing this) have already been turned into second class rights that are regularly trampled on by the federal government. We don't need to add the 1st amendment to that list IMO. I obviously don't like to see our flag be burned but I also believe the 1st amendment is pretty clear on this.

Mrgunsngear

21,324 просмотров • 1 год назад

Thomas Massie says there are only about 30 good Republicans in the House, and the rest are either evil or just NPCs. “There are about 30 folks like that… 30 good people out of a Republican conference in the House that has 220.” “They wake up every day and they want to do the right thing, even if it would cost them their election.” “Then there’s 30 bad folks… they are evil… they will do the wrong thing even if the right thing would get them more votes.” “That leaves 160 members of Congress who are all running the same program.” “They’re like NPCs. They will follow whichever set of leadership prevails.” Thomas Massie Dave Smith
4:47

Thomas Massie says there are only about 30 good Republicans in the House, and the rest are either evil or just NPCs. “There are about 30 folks like that… 30 good people out of a Republican conference in the House that has 220.” “They wake up every day and they want to do the right thing, even if it would cost them their election.” “Then there’s 30 bad folks… they are evil… they will do the wrong thing even if the right thing would get them more votes.” “That leaves 160 members of Congress who are all running the same program.” “They’re like NPCs. They will follow whichever set of leadership prevails.” Thomas Massie Dave Smith

End Tribalism in Politics

384,577 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The last thing Texas, or the nation needs are Red Flag Laws. As a military veteran and proud gun owner, I know that burdening law-abiding citizens goes against the very spirit of the Second Amendment. That’s exactly why John Cornyn is in trouble, Texans don’t want gun grabs disguised as “safety.” And every time weak Republicans make concessions with our fundamental rights, what’s the first thing the Left says? “We have to do more.” They will never be satisfied until the 2nd Amendment is erased from history. NOT on my watch.
1:20

The last thing Texas, or the nation needs are Red Flag Laws. As a military veteran and proud gun owner, I know that burdening law-abiding citizens goes against the very spirit of the Second Amendment. That’s exactly why John Cornyn is in trouble, Texans don’t want gun grabs disguised as “safety.” And every time weak Republicans make concessions with our fundamental rights, what’s the first thing the Left says? “We have to do more.” They will never be satisfied until the 2nd Amendment is erased from history. NOT on my watch.

Wesley Hunt

15,509 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Kentucky doesn’t need to codify federal gun control. Yesterday in Judiciary Committee, legislators heard a bill proposal that would change Kentucky law to adopt a federal firearm restriction. I’m vehemently opposed to gun control at the federal level—why on earth would we want to codify it into a state law here in the Commonwealth?! As a stalwart defender of our Second Amendment Rights, it is my hope that federal firearm restrictions will be repealed by Congress, or at least overturned like the bump stock ban. The last thing we need is more gun control at the state level. Those of us working to repeal existing gun control laws already have our hands full! This is Kentucky, and our right to keep and bear arms is not negotiable. 🇺🇸
1:20

Kentucky doesn’t need to codify federal gun control. Yesterday in Judiciary Committee, legislators heard a bill proposal that would change Kentucky law to adopt a federal firearm restriction. I’m vehemently opposed to gun control at the federal level—why on earth would we want to codify it into a state law here in the Commonwealth?! As a stalwart defender of our Second Amendment Rights, it is my hope that federal firearm restrictions will be repealed by Congress, or at least overturned like the bump stock ban. The last thing we need is more gun control at the state level. Those of us working to repeal existing gun control laws already have our hands full! This is Kentucky, and our right to keep and bear arms is not negotiable. 🇺🇸

Savannah Maddox

32,261 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

The truth and misinformation about the carbon tax: ✅ Mark Carney “urged national governments” to implement it in 2016 ✅ the carbon tax is an Act. It’s literally passed as a law, called “Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act” ✅ You can go to jail for a failure to file a return, or comply with demand order ✅ Last I checked, NO LAW has been passed to repeal the Carbon Tax So how can they “kill” a law with no Parliament? ✅ No one voted to repeal it So what precedent does this set when the government can decide to not enforce, or in this case, break their own laws when it’s unpopular and affects their ability to get reelected? This has nothing to do with Canada‘s best interest, if it did, they would’ve ended it years ago but instead they sold it to us as “we get more money back”. This is purely for their own selfish reasons to stay in power. It’s disgusting
3:32

The truth and misinformation about the carbon tax: ✅ Mark Carney “urged national governments” to implement it in 2016 ✅ the carbon tax is an Act. It’s literally passed as a law, called “Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act” ✅ You can go to jail for a failure to file a return, or comply with demand order ✅ Last I checked, NO LAW has been passed to repeal the Carbon Tax So how can they “kill” a law with no Parliament? ✅ No one voted to repeal it So what precedent does this set when the government can decide to not enforce, or in this case, break their own laws when it’s unpopular and affects their ability to get reelected? This has nothing to do with Canada‘s best interest, if it did, they would’ve ended it years ago but instead they sold it to us as “we get more money back”. This is purely for their own selfish reasons to stay in power. It’s disgusting

Mario Zelaya

42,120 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BREAKING: The House Leader of the NDP, Heather McPherson, calls Elon Musk a Nazi & for him to be jailed. THIS IS AN ELECTED CANADIAN MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT. Here’s what Elon is guilty of: ✅ Starlink to 3rd world countries ignored by every telecom ✅ Restoring internet to Ukraine in the first days of the Russian invasion ✅ Cut the cost of space launches by 90% ✅ Forced the global auto industry to electrify ✅ Co-founded OpenAI Canada has reached the point where the second ranking NDP official can’t distinguish between a Nazi & the most successful entrepreneur of all time. If this is the standard for House Leader, what does the back bench look like?
2:59

🚨 BREAKING: The House Leader of the NDP, Heather McPherson, calls Elon Musk a Nazi & for him to be jailed. THIS IS AN ELECTED CANADIAN MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT. Here’s what Elon is guilty of: ✅ Starlink to 3rd world countries ignored by every telecom ✅ Restoring internet to Ukraine in the first days of the Russian invasion ✅ Cut the cost of space launches by 90% ✅ Forced the global auto industry to electrify ✅ Co-founded OpenAI Canada has reached the point where the second ranking NDP official can’t distinguish between a Nazi & the most successful entrepreneur of all time. If this is the standard for House Leader, what does the back bench look like?

Mario Zelaya

41,471 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.
5:49

Yesterday, our Judiciary Committee passed HR 38, National Reciprocity. I support this bill, but there is a better option, and it is National Constitutional Carry. 29 states already have Constitutional (i.e. permitless) Carry. Why not extend it to all 50 states? Under HR 38 (Reciprocity), a resident of one of the Constitutional Carry states can carry in any state that allows their citizens to obtain a permit. The recent “Bruen” Supreme Court decision requires all states that aren’t Constitutional Carry to issue carry permits to their citizens. This means that when HR 38 passes, any resident of those 29 Constitutional Carry states will be able to carry in any of the 50 states without a permit. Ironically, however, residents of the 21 states (like New York or California) that aren’t Constitutional Carry will need a permit to carry in their own state, while visitors from states that are Constitutional Carry (like Kentucky or Ohio) won’t need a permit to carry in states like New York or California. If Congress, relying on the Second Amendment, can force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Kentuckians who visit California, why would we not force California to allow “Permitless” Carry for Californians who are in California? In other words, why not pass National Constitutional Carry and afford everyone in the United States the right to “bear arms” which is enshrined in the Constitution? The other quirk of HR 38 is that (I believe) it would allow a person from Kentucky to carry an AR-15 pistol with a 20-round magazine in California, while Californians would not be allowed to carry, or even own, the same equipment. The Supreme Court decision in “D.C. v. Heller,” whether you agree with it or not, allows states to have some regulations on firearm equipment and eligibility to possess, but HR 38 seems to contradict that framework. Contrast this with my National Constitutional Carry bill which basically says if a state allows people to possess (KEEP) a particular firearm, that state must also allow people to carry (BEAR) that firearm. I introduced my National Constitutional Carry bill in committee yesterday as a substitute amendment to HR 38, National Reciprocity. After introducing the amendment for the record and describing it, I withdrew the amendment instead of putting my Judiciary Committee colleagues in the position of deciding whether to replace National Reciprocity with National Constitutional Carry. The dilemma is that not enough Republicans in the whole House understand the difference, and the prevailing opinion is that Reciprocity can pass the whole House, but Constitutional Carry cannot. Perhaps when more of my colleagues who are not on the Judiciary Committee understand why we should pass National Constitutional Carry instead of (or in addition to) National Reciprocity, we can make a strong push to report National Constitutional Carry out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote in the full House of Representatives. In the meantime, I’m glad HR 38 is going to the House floor for a vote.

Thomas Massie

229,372 просмотров • 1 год назад

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he did not think Alex Pretti, the second U.S. citizen to be killed by federal forces in Minnesota this month, was acting as an assassin. "You can't have guns. You can't walk in with guns," the president said in response to a question from PBS News' Liz Landers (Liz Landers), reiterating a talking point from the administration that Pretti should not have brought a legally carried handgun to the scene — a position that has infuriated gun rights advocates. The president's response amounted to a softening of his administration's tone on the Jan. 24 shooting, after several of his top aides, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, described Pretti as a threat to federal agents. Following Pretti's death, gun rights groups have released statements, saying that it's legal to carry firearms during protests or while exercising First Amendment rights. Landers asked Trump about the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. "It's a very unfortunate incident," Trump said, shortly before departing the White House for a planned speech in Iowa.
1:02

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he did not think Alex Pretti, the second U.S. citizen to be killed by federal forces in Minnesota this month, was acting as an assassin. "You can't have guns. You can't walk in with guns," the president said in response to a question from PBS News' Liz Landers (Liz Landers), reiterating a talking point from the administration that Pretti should not have brought a legally carried handgun to the scene — a position that has infuriated gun rights advocates. The president's response amounted to a softening of his administration's tone on the Jan. 24 shooting, after several of his top aides, including White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, described Pretti as a threat to federal agents. Following Pretti's death, gun rights groups have released statements, saying that it's legal to carry firearms during protests or while exercising First Amendment rights. Landers asked Trump about the Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms. "It's a very unfortunate incident," Trump said, shortly before departing the White House for a planned speech in Iowa.

PBS News

38,804 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Congress and CPM stand together in Keralam Assembly against India's national security. They passed a resolution against the FCRA amendments. They opposed amendments that strengthen transparency in foreign funding and safeguard India's national security. Sadly, this is not surprising. What respect can you have for an Assembly that once passed a resolution supporting the international terrorist Abdul Nasser Madani? During the elections, Congress ran a campaign of fear and misinformation about this amendment. They continue to do so today, at the expense of the safety and security of Keralam and India. So let me state the facts clearly: ✅ This Bill does not target any particular community. ✅ Hindu, Christian, and Muslim organisations all receive FCRA contributions. ✅ The purpose of this law is simple: to ensure foreign contributions are not misused for money laundering, unlawful activities, or threats to India's security. ✅ This is also about protecting Keralam from foreign-funded sabotage. Yet, the LDF and UDF continue to oppose it. For them, power politics comes first. For us, India comes first 🇮🇳 #APAKADAMPolitics
1:00

Congress and CPM stand together in Keralam Assembly against India's national security. They passed a resolution against the FCRA amendments. They opposed amendments that strengthen transparency in foreign funding and safeguard India's national security. Sadly, this is not surprising. What respect can you have for an Assembly that once passed a resolution supporting the international terrorist Abdul Nasser Madani? During the elections, Congress ran a campaign of fear and misinformation about this amendment. They continue to do so today, at the expense of the safety and security of Keralam and India. So let me state the facts clearly: ✅ This Bill does not target any particular community. ✅ Hindu, Christian, and Muslim organisations all receive FCRA contributions. ✅ The purpose of this law is simple: to ensure foreign contributions are not misused for money laundering, unlawful activities, or threats to India's security. ✅ This is also about protecting Keralam from foreign-funded sabotage. Yet, the LDF and UDF continue to oppose it. For them, power politics comes first. For us, India comes first 🇮🇳 #APAKADAMPolitics

Rajeev Chandrasekhar 🇮🇳

11,581 просмотров • 17 дней назад

🚨EXPOSED: Every REPUBLICAN Member of Congress—Has An Assigned AIPAC Babysitter?!😤 CONGRESSMAN Thomas Massie just revealed on TCN that every Republican member of Congress—except him, has an assigned AIPAC Babysitter? 📉🕵️‍♂️ THE SHOCKING REVELATIONS: Massie reveals that his colleagues literally have "handlers" embedded in their districts. They have the Congressman's personal cell number, they do lunch, and they ensure every vote aligns with a foreign government’s spreadsheet. Massie exposes the cowardice on the House floor. Republicans come to him and whisper, "You're making the right vote, but I'd take too much flack back home from my AIPAC person if I joined you." * The All-Expense-Paid Trips: Almost every member takes the "vacationy" trip to Israel for themselves and their spouses, paid for by the lobby. It’s not just a visit; it’s an indoctrination. As Massie points out, there isn't a "Britain guy," a "Germany dude," or a "Russia person" assigned to every member. Israel is the only country that has a uniform, matched-up system to ensure our representatives take orders from a foreign power. We elect people to represent WE THE PEOPLE, not to check in with a foreign lobbyist before they cast a vote. If our leaders are more afraid of their "AIPAC babysitter" than they are of their own constituents, then our sovereignty has already been sold. This is exactly why the USS Liberty is never talked about. This is why our borders stay open while we fund the borders of others. It’s time to fire the babysitters and get back to AMERICA FIRST. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Tucker Carlson and Thomas Massie
3:48

🚨EXPOSED: Every REPUBLICAN Member of Congress—Has An Assigned AIPAC Babysitter?!😤 CONGRESSMAN Thomas Massie just revealed on TCN that every Republican member of Congress—except him, has an assigned AIPAC Babysitter? 📉🕵️‍♂️ THE SHOCKING REVELATIONS: Massie reveals that his colleagues literally have "handlers" embedded in their districts. They have the Congressman's personal cell number, they do lunch, and they ensure every vote aligns with a foreign government’s spreadsheet. Massie exposes the cowardice on the House floor. Republicans come to him and whisper, "You're making the right vote, but I'd take too much flack back home from my AIPAC person if I joined you." * The All-Expense-Paid Trips: Almost every member takes the "vacationy" trip to Israel for themselves and their spouses, paid for by the lobby. It’s not just a visit; it’s an indoctrination. As Massie points out, there isn't a "Britain guy," a "Germany dude," or a "Russia person" assigned to every member. Israel is the only country that has a uniform, matched-up system to ensure our representatives take orders from a foreign power. We elect people to represent WE THE PEOPLE, not to check in with a foreign lobbyist before they cast a vote. If our leaders are more afraid of their "AIPAC babysitter" than they are of their own constituents, then our sovereignty has already been sold. This is exactly why the USS Liberty is never talked about. This is why our borders stay open while we fund the borders of others. It’s time to fire the babysitters and get back to AMERICA FIRST. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Tucker Carlson and Thomas Massie

Project Constitution

220,392 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is why Rep. Andrew Clyde (A+ GOA Rated) just voted NO on the reconciliation bill in committee ⤵️ "House Republicans have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to deliver real conservative change in Washington. [This includes] restoring Second Amendment rights. "Unfortunately, the current version falls short of these goals and fails to deliver the transformative change that Americans were promised. Substantive improvements are needed, and I look forward to working with this committee and our House Republican conference to make sure we deliver. "As an ardent Second Amendment defender, I’ve always promised to defend my constituents’ Second Amendment rights. Today, excise taxes, specifically transfer and making taxes, are imposed on every firearm regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934. "As Chief Justice John Marshall warned in 1819, 'The power to tax involves the power to destroy,' and he was absolutely right. These taxes have enabled unconstitutional regulation and registration under the National Firearms Act. "This is exemplified by the Biden administration’s dangerous pistol brace rule, which turned millions of law-abiding gun owners, many of them veterans, into felons overnight. The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, and regulation of short-barreled firearms, both rifles and shotguns, and suppressors under the National Firearms Act. The American people are watching; it is time to deliver. "For these reasons, I am unable to support this package in its current form, but I look forward to strengthening this bill to ensure that it does pass so that we fulfill all of our America-first promises to the American people. Thank you, and I yield back."
2:14

This is why Rep. Andrew Clyde (A+ GOA Rated) just voted NO on the reconciliation bill in committee ⤵️ "House Republicans have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to deliver real conservative change in Washington. [This includes] restoring Second Amendment rights. "Unfortunately, the current version falls short of these goals and fails to deliver the transformative change that Americans were promised. Substantive improvements are needed, and I look forward to working with this committee and our House Republican conference to make sure we deliver. "As an ardent Second Amendment defender, I’ve always promised to defend my constituents’ Second Amendment rights. Today, excise taxes, specifically transfer and making taxes, are imposed on every firearm regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934. "As Chief Justice John Marshall warned in 1819, 'The power to tax involves the power to destroy,' and he was absolutely right. These taxes have enabled unconstitutional regulation and registration under the National Firearms Act. "This is exemplified by the Biden administration’s dangerous pistol brace rule, which turned millions of law-abiding gun owners, many of them veterans, into felons overnight. The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, and regulation of short-barreled firearms, both rifles and shotguns, and suppressors under the National Firearms Act. The American people are watching; it is time to deliver. "For these reasons, I am unable to support this package in its current form, but I look forward to strengthening this bill to ensure that it does pass so that we fulfill all of our America-first promises to the American people. Thank you, and I yield back."

Gun Owners of America

20,217 просмотров • 1 год назад