正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world. And they're moving very, very fast. They're almost at...

joshrogin's profile picture

Josh Rogin

259,978 subscribers

54,604 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

23 条评论

Rational 的头像
Rational6 天前

@RubenGallego Hysterical! “Isn’t China just so sincere & thoughtful!” My God you gullible idiots.

Anton 的头像
Anton6 天前

This sounds like something a CCP operative would say, you’re not fooling anybody chief

Taylor 的头像
Taylor6 天前

This is literally all fake news.

The DEEP Marcellus 的头像
The DEEP Marcellus6 天前

Please delete this tweet…you couldn’t be further from the truth here….

Matt Bartholomew 的头像
Matt Bartholomew6 天前

I’m surprised you’d quote yourself showing that your argument is terrible. Don’t speak of regulation if you aren’t being consistent in its meaning. Also, you say that China is moving fast yet imply that it isn’t moving fast enough to surpass the US based companies? Competition is inherently self-serving, so you advocate withdrawing from the competition, correct?

Kate O'Hehir 的头像
Kate O'Hehir6 天前

Yes, bad bad China. If it's made in China it must be bad. They built green energy wind farms in Mongolia and solar farms in the Gobi desert AND THEN BUILT THE DATA CENTERS UP NORTH IN UNPOPULATED AREAS next to the green energy providing ALL the AI needs without touching exisiting electrical systems that power the rest of the country.

_relativity _ 的头像
_relativity _5 天前

How many Chinese women has this guy slept with or married, and how many seeds has he sown to come up with such a brain-dead take? It reads like a textbook case of ideological castration through genetic conquest. The sheer submissiveness here is just incredible.🫴

hidewatchlaugh 的头像
hidewatchlaugh6 天前

He's worried a competitor or open source will beat him. He does not care about China in the least.

Mark 的头像
Mark5 天前

What an Incompetent moron

Weaver 的头像
Weaver5 天前

There is zero logical reason to create a new regulatory regime for ai. ZERO!

Asa Hidmark 的头像
Asa Hidmark5 天前

US AI are already regulated by EU AI act GPAI and by california law since February 2026. US AI is already regulated

kdrecon 的头像
kdrecon6 天前

China has "moved fast" in part because they have drafted off US innovation.

Egbert Aethelbald 的头像
Egbert Aethelbald5 天前

No, China is not "almost at where we are." This is dumb guy stuff.

soph s, 的头像
soph s,5 天前

Well said!

RamenFreak 的头像
RamenFreak6 天前

Gee, I wonder who you work for?

𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏 - e/acc 的头像
𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏𝕏 - e/acc5 天前

I can't believe someone posting something that dumb can get on TV. 🤦‍♂️

Pascal J 的头像
Pascal J5 天前

"Must gives us all your money" or we lose geopolitical power is always a fraud. Must bankrupt the US or Iran wins is another version of this fraud. Far greater than 10% extinction risk, because AI race is actually a Skynet race. No one should care where you buy productivity.

TM🌕 的头像
TM🌕5 天前

Have you seen how the u.s. and the west does regulation? Chinas regulation is we want this build it and dont say anything bad about the ccp. The U.S., I want to build this oh well that will be a 10 year review we will get back to you

Steve 的头像
Steve5 天前

LOL China’s regulations are not the regulations you want here in the US, but I feel you know that 😂🖕

Steve Stanton 的头像
Steve Stanton5 天前

Wut? There is no meaningful distinction between govt as a regulator, govt as a shareholder, and govt as a manager in China. The regulations will be whatever the government wants them to be... For whatever purpose the government prioritizes... Whether it's the success of the company, the advancement of a particular technology, the benefit of the Chinese people, the defense of the mainland and the party, international strategic considerations, or product safety. Yes of course there are vibrant private and public companies. Literally every company of any significant size has representation by the party. And every significant decision made by those companies is made with the knowledge and tacit approval of the party. And anything done by these parties to embarrass China or the party... Whether the action was legal or not... Creates potentially serious consequences for the managers who took those actions (or inaction). Imagine if you gave Donald Trump a brand new "Department of Large Companies"... And he had board seats and Senior managers of his own choosing at every single large company in the United States... Public or private... As well as people inside every significant foreign company operating in the United States... And he could make any regulations he wanted on the fly without a comment period... At the same rate he makes executive orders... Without judicial review. And he could choose to selectively enforce these new regulations however, he wished... That is not too far from the current China model. Yes regulated But what does regulated mean? And is that a model you want to follow? At the advantage of this " department of large companies" approach... You gain the flexibility of making regulations in real time, adapting them dynamically and enforcing them selectively based on government discretion... So you do gain a nimbleness to dial up or dial down controls... And accelerate or decelerate the pacing... The disadvantage of course is that very few people would be happy with Trump controlling a " department of large companies"... And among the people who would be happy with that... Pretty much none of them would be happy with the other party controlling it in 2/6/10/14 years.

Dale 的头像
Dale5 天前

China regulates political content only! They’re a communist country, you dumbass, of course they regulate that🤬

Kevlar 的头像
Kevlar5 天前

Yours is also a self serving argument. So no credibility for you.

Christopher James 的头像
Christopher James5 天前

How much does communist China pay you to push their propaganda?

相关视频

We can regulate AI and also win the race with China. It’s a false choice. “The U.S. tech bros and the Trump people, they're basically in it for the money. The Chinese Communist Party is a genocidal dictatorship that's in it for their own power - and they mean us harm. That's worse. So we don't want that to happen.” “And if if they were to win, it basically means that all the other countries of the world are going to build their tech stacks on Chinese tech rather than American tech. That's a big threat. We don't want the Global South and Europe and Asia to be riddled with Chinese AI, because then China's going to be able to assert a great amount of power.” “At the same time, anyone who tells you that means we should just let American tech companies run wild with no regulation is trying to fool you into thinking that's actually the solution to the problem. There’s a middle ground - where we regulate AI and still win the race - that’s what we have to try to figure out.”
0:49

We can regulate AI and also win the race with China. It’s a false choice. “The U.S. tech bros and the Trump people, they're basically in it for the money. The Chinese Communist Party is a genocidal dictatorship that's in it for their own power - and they mean us harm. That's worse. So we don't want that to happen.” “And if if they were to win, it basically means that all the other countries of the world are going to build their tech stacks on Chinese tech rather than American tech. That's a big threat. We don't want the Global South and Europe and Asia to be riddled with Chinese AI, because then China's going to be able to assert a great amount of power.” “At the same time, anyone who tells you that means we should just let American tech companies run wild with no regulation is trying to fool you into thinking that's actually the solution to the problem. There’s a middle ground - where we regulate AI and still win the race - that’s what we have to try to figure out.”

Josh Rogin

30,120 次观看 • 4 天前

This is exactly right from David Sacks interview with Bret Baier: "One of the things that Jacob and others have claimed is we can reach a deal with China, and that if we pause, they will pause. And there is simply no basis for believing that. Chinese officials have never said that and, in fact, if you look at the statements of Chinese officials and their AI companies, they believe that AI is something that's very good for their economy and they are interested in moving that forward...if we do try to pause or stop our AI development, we will play into China’s hands."
1:18

This is exactly right from David Sacks interview with Bret Baier: "One of the things that Jacob and others have claimed is we can reach a deal with China, and that if we pause, they will pause. And there is simply no basis for believing that. Chinese officials have never said that and, in fact, if you look at the statements of Chinese officials and their AI companies, they believe that AI is something that's very good for their economy and they are interested in moving that forward...if we do try to pause or stop our AI development, we will play into China’s hands."

Innovation Council

84,862 次观看 • 13 天前

THAT MOMENT WHEN NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG WAS ASKED ABOUT HIS COMMENTS ON CHINA BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE: “THAT’S NOT WHAT I SAID. WHAT I SAID WAS THAT CHINA HAS VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THEY HAVE MANY AI RESEARCHERS. IN FACT, 50% OF THE WORLD’S AI RESEARCHERS ARE IN CHINA. THEY DEVELOP VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THE MOST POPULAR OPEN-SOURCE AI MODELS IN THE WORLD TODAY ARE FROM CHINA. SO THEY ARE MOVING VERY, VERY FAST. THE UNITED STATES HAS TO CONTINUE TO MOVE INCREDIBLY FAST. OTHERWISE, THE WORLD IS VERY COMPETITIVE, SO WE HAVE TO RUN FAST.”
0:40

THAT MOMENT WHEN NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG WAS ASKED ABOUT HIS COMMENTS ON CHINA BEATING THE U.S. IN THE AI RACE: “THAT’S NOT WHAT I SAID. WHAT I SAID WAS THAT CHINA HAS VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THEY HAVE MANY AI RESEARCHERS. IN FACT, 50% OF THE WORLD’S AI RESEARCHERS ARE IN CHINA. THEY DEVELOP VERY GOOD AI TECHNOLOGY. THE MOST POPULAR OPEN-SOURCE AI MODELS IN THE WORLD TODAY ARE FROM CHINA. SO THEY ARE MOVING VERY, VERY FAST. THE UNITED STATES HAS TO CONTINUE TO MOVE INCREDIBLY FAST. OTHERWISE, THE WORLD IS VERY COMPETITIVE, SO WE HAVE TO RUN FAST.”

Vivek Sen

155,599 次观看 • 3 个月前

NEW: Joe Lonsdale flips AI regulation debate on its head Maria Bartiromo: AI is moving faster than regulation. Does that concern you? Joe: What I'm concerned by is that AI is moving faster than the ability for the government to allow us to do this. AI is helping cure all these new diseases... But we have an FDA that's not letting us save lives... The FDA is not set up for the AI age. It's set up to let China take over the sector... There are more big [pharma] deals buying Chinese drugs [than U.S. drugs]; there are more clinical trials going on in China. We need a leader of the FDA that will push back on the bureaucracy, that will say, we are going to both be safe and we're going to go faster and save more lives.
2:09

NEW: Joe Lonsdale flips AI regulation debate on its head Maria Bartiromo: AI is moving faster than regulation. Does that concern you? Joe: What I'm concerned by is that AI is moving faster than the ability for the government to allow us to do this. AI is helping cure all these new diseases... But we have an FDA that's not letting us save lives... The FDA is not set up for the AI age. It's set up to let China take over the sector... There are more big [pharma] deals buying Chinese drugs [than U.S. drugs]; there are more clinical trials going on in China. We need a leader of the FDA that will push back on the bureaucracy, that will say, we are going to both be safe and we're going to go faster and save more lives.

American Optimist

57,521 次观看 • 3 个月前

Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang was asked about a recent story that said he warned that China will beat the US in the AI race “That’s not what I said. What I said was China has very good AI technology. They have many AI researchers, in fact 50% of the world’s AI researchers are in China. And they develop very good AI technology. In fact, the most popular AI models in the world today, open-source models, are from China. So, they are moving very, very fast. The United States has to continue to move incredibly fast. And otherwise, otherwise – the world is very competitive, so we have to run fast.” (H/T Dan Nystedt)
0:42

Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang was asked about a recent story that said he warned that China will beat the US in the AI race “That’s not what I said. What I said was China has very good AI technology. They have many AI researchers, in fact 50% of the world’s AI researchers are in China. And they develop very good AI technology. In fact, the most popular AI models in the world today, open-source models, are from China. So, they are moving very, very fast. The United States has to continue to move incredibly fast. And otherwise, otherwise – the world is very competitive, so we have to run fast.” (H/T Dan Nystedt)

Evan

1,946,920 次观看 • 10 个月前

Sacks: China’s Biggest AI Advantage Over America Is Optimism @jason on China's Robot Olympics: “This is pretty crazy. The CCP is f**king brilliant at PR. Look what they did. They got a bunch of Chinese people to fill a stadium and cheer for AI and robotics. They're cheering for it. They're rooting for it.” David Sacks: “It is true that China is much more optimistic about AI than we are. AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, ‘Do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful?’ Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US, that number is like 30%. So I've been saying for a while that the US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. And that is the biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China, is doing something that will shoot ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do.”
0:48

Sacks: China’s Biggest AI Advantage Over America Is Optimism @jason on China's Robot Olympics: “This is pretty crazy. The CCP is f**king brilliant at PR. Look what they did. They got a bunch of Chinese people to fill a stadium and cheer for AI and robotics. They're cheering for it. They're rooting for it.” David Sacks: “It is true that China is much more optimistic about AI than we are. AI optimism in China is over 80%. They poll on the question, ‘Do you think AI will be more beneficial than harmful?’ Over 80% of Chinese people say yes. In the US, that number is like 30%. So I've been saying for a while that the US is ahead of China in every category except one, which is optimism. And that is the biggest risk to us winning this AI race against China, is doing something that will shoot ourselves in the foot because we're so pessimistic about what AI might do.”

The All-In Podcast

58,016 次观看 • 26 天前

“Godfather” of AI Yoshua Bengio says take those AI warnings seriously: “If we build entities that are smarter than us and that we don't control, they could harm us. And if they're smart enough, they could potentially get rid of humanity if that's in their interest. And what we're seeing now is that they have a kind of self-interest that isn't aligned with our own objectives, our own instructions.”
1:11

“Godfather” of AI Yoshua Bengio says take those AI warnings seriously: “If we build entities that are smarter than us and that we don't control, they could harm us. And if they're smart enough, they could potentially get rid of humanity if that's in their interest. And what we're seeing now is that they have a kind of self-interest that isn't aligned with our own objectives, our own instructions.”

Jim Sciutto

45,205 次观看 • 9 天前

Davos: Philips CEO Roy Jakobs argues that government regulation is too slow to keep up with the rollout of AI within healthcare, so the healthcare industry must regulate itself instead. "Regulation cannot keep up with the speed of technology. So we need to be ahead of regulation and self-regulate." "We need to have our own kind of rules."
1:02

Davos: Philips CEO Roy Jakobs argues that government regulation is too slow to keep up with the rollout of AI within healthcare, so the healthcare industry must regulate itself instead. "Regulation cannot keep up with the speed of technology. So we need to be ahead of regulation and self-regulate." "We need to have our own kind of rules."

Wide Awake Media

18,615 次观看 • 8 个月前

Speaker Mike Johnson on AI regulation: "We cannot have a moratorium on the development of AI because then we will lose our edge to China, and that has serious national security implications for every American family."
3:51

Speaker Mike Johnson on AI regulation: "We cannot have a moratorium on the development of AI because then we will lose our edge to China, and that has serious national security implications for every American family."

Breaking911

66,938 次观看 • 9 天前

Amy Kremer: All we hear from Big Tech is their sales pitch. "But China! We have to beat China in the AI race!" If we have to beat China then why did we find out last week that OpenAI and Google are selling their frontier models to Chinese subsidiaries that have been blacklisted by the Pentagon? Amy Kremer
3:52

Amy Kremer: All we hear from Big Tech is their sales pitch. "But China! We have to beat China in the AI race!" If we have to beat China then why did we find out last week that OpenAI and Google are selling their frontier models to Chinese subsidiaries that have been blacklisted by the Pentagon? Amy Kremer

Bannon’s WarRoom

10,355 次观看 • 2 个月前

.Ben Shapiro cuts through the noise on CNN NewsNight about the concerns about AI: "One argument is that the risks are being exaggerated by people who have a very strong interest in regulatory capture, who wanna write the regulations themselves. Most of the people who are pushing the apocalyptic talk very hard are people who are heads of closed models. They're very afraid of open models that theoretically could challenge them, and also they have liability in court that open models don't. So looking for regulation for a sort of regulatory harbor that allows them to develop without the possibility of products liability is a good idea for them. So I think that's one argument. The other argument is the argument that Alex Karp over at Palantir has made, which I think is exactly right, which is China has no concern about any of this. China's just gonna race forward, and China, if they outstrip us they beat us in the AI race, then we'll all be using Chinese models, and that will come along with all the strings that are attached to that, including military dominance by China." Refreshing clarity on CNN.
1:07

.Ben Shapiro cuts through the noise on CNN NewsNight about the concerns about AI: "One argument is that the risks are being exaggerated by people who have a very strong interest in regulatory capture, who wanna write the regulations themselves. Most of the people who are pushing the apocalyptic talk very hard are people who are heads of closed models. They're very afraid of open models that theoretically could challenge them, and also they have liability in court that open models don't. So looking for regulation for a sort of regulatory harbor that allows them to develop without the possibility of products liability is a good idea for them. So I think that's one argument. The other argument is the argument that Alex Karp over at Palantir has made, which I think is exactly right, which is China has no concern about any of this. China's just gonna race forward, and China, if they outstrip us they beat us in the AI race, then we'll all be using Chinese models, and that will come along with all the strings that are attached to that, including military dominance by China." Refreshing clarity on CNN.

Steve Guest

18,340 次观看 • 9 天前

🇪🇺 EU’S AI BOSS: REGULATING AI WON’T RUIN TECH - WE STILL MAKE GOOD STUFF Kilian Gross, head of AI regulation and compliance at the European Commission: “I find this too simplistic to say always there is this contradiction between or this tension between regulation and innovation. If we look at technology, a lot of technology we have in Europe are really good at. Let's look medical devices or cars where we really have a highly regulated market, but we have very high quality products. What we expect from the AI Act that it will do a bit the same.” Source: Politico
1:01

🇪🇺 EU’S AI BOSS: REGULATING AI WON’T RUIN TECH - WE STILL MAKE GOOD STUFF Kilian Gross, head of AI regulation and compliance at the European Commission: “I find this too simplistic to say always there is this contradiction between or this tension between regulation and innovation. If we look at technology, a lot of technology we have in Europe are really good at. Let's look medical devices or cars where we really have a highly regulated market, but we have very high quality products. What we expect from the AI Act that it will do a bit the same.” Source: Politico

Mario Nawfal

151,088 次观看 • 1 年前

US VP, JD Vance on US frontier labs asking for AI regulation : "I feel a little bit weird about the fact that you have so many frontier AI tech companies kind of coming to the government and begging the government to regulate them. It feels like a bit of a Trojan horse. So, I think we just have to be careful about this. We know that the Chinese are engaged in this long-term AI race against the United States. We want to make sure that the United States does things smartly, but we stay ahead of the curve. I don’t think Americans should be scared of anything. I think that we have to be mindful that there are risks and there are downsides to anything, and that’s certainly true of AI." ---- From "Forbes Breaking News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)
1:13

US VP, JD Vance on US frontier labs asking for AI regulation : "I feel a little bit weird about the fact that you have so many frontier AI tech companies kind of coming to the government and begging the government to regulate them. It feels like a bit of a Trojan horse. So, I think we just have to be careful about this. We know that the Chinese are engaged in this long-term AI race against the United States. We want to make sure that the United States does things smartly, but we stay ahead of the curve. I don’t think Americans should be scared of anything. I think that we have to be mindful that there are risks and there are downsides to anything, and that’s certainly true of AI." ---- From "Forbes Breaking News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

32,531 次观看 • 10 天前

Trump: We don't want to see China take over crypto. I don't want to see China win with AI. AI and crypto. Crypto is a big deal. I mean I see it more and more where people are paying with Bitcoin and you know they don't even know about cash anymore. That takes a lot of pressure off our dollar. It's a good thing for our country. But if China took over crypto, which they would love to do, or if China took over AI, which they would really... So, we are leading with AI on China. Nobody thought that was possible.
0:43

Trump: We don't want to see China take over crypto. I don't want to see China win with AI. AI and crypto. Crypto is a big deal. I mean I see it more and more where people are paying with Bitcoin and you know they don't even know about cash anymore. That takes a lot of pressure off our dollar. It's a good thing for our country. But if China took over crypto, which they would love to do, or if China took over AI, which they would really... So, we are leading with AI on China. Nobody thought that was possible.

Military Summary

11,831 次观看 • 1 个月前

“We’re rolling out a set of rules in a responsible way to where we can beat China with the A.I. cold race, where we win this tech of the future but do it in a responsible way...We’re hearing out constituents and we're addressing their concerns but we also have to beat China when it comes to this tech battle of the future.” West Virginia State Senator Senator Chris Rose is pushing a balanced approach to AI regulation—rules that address and protect constituents' concerns without slowing America down in the tech battle that matters most: beating China to the future. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on OAN Live Today!
0:54

“We’re rolling out a set of rules in a responsible way to where we can beat China with the A.I. cold race, where we win this tech of the future but do it in a responsible way...We’re hearing out constituents and we're addressing their concerns but we also have to beat China when it comes to this tech battle of the future.” West Virginia State Senator Senator Chris Rose is pushing a balanced approach to AI regulation—rules that address and protect constituents' concerns without slowing America down in the tech battle that matters most: beating China to the future. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on OAN Live Today!

One America News

67,119 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tech bros pretend to be our friends. All they want is AI amnesty. They will run over Americans to get it. They push their agenda. Harm children. Target conservatives. Rob creators. Destroy communities. We must end this. They claim we need to become like China to beat China. We reject that. We will compete against China the American way. We win like we always have. We must protect the four C's: Children. Conservatives. Creators. Communities. No AI amnesty.
16:21

Tech bros pretend to be our friends. All they want is AI amnesty. They will run over Americans to get it. They push their agenda. Harm children. Target conservatives. Rob creators. Destroy communities. We must end this. They claim we need to become like China to beat China. We reject that. We will compete against China the American way. We win like we always have. We must protect the four C's: Children. Conservatives. Creators. Communities. No AI amnesty.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

17,864 次观看 • 13 天前

I think the narrative on AI is very much that occurred when television went to color and everybody said it would wipe out radio. It didn't happen. It's a tool. It's a tool for productivity and margin enhancement. It's just starting to get utilized in all 11 sectors of the economy. My companies use it. But it's nowhere near the disruptor that people think. I'm more concerned about Chinese on AI because they have unlimited power. They are not restricted to set up coal-burning electrical plants. We can't do that. AI right now, for me, is a competition on defense and the military in China. I worry that we're falling behind the Chinese on power on our grid, and we haven't addressed it yet. We do not have policy that lets us build out at the same pace they are.
1:37

I think the narrative on AI is very much that occurred when television went to color and everybody said it would wipe out radio. It didn't happen. It's a tool. It's a tool for productivity and margin enhancement. It's just starting to get utilized in all 11 sectors of the economy. My companies use it. But it's nowhere near the disruptor that people think. I'm more concerned about Chinese on AI because they have unlimited power. They are not restricted to set up coal-burning electrical plants. We can't do that. AI right now, for me, is a competition on defense and the military in China. I worry that we're falling behind the Chinese on power on our grid, and we haven't addressed it yet. We do not have policy that lets us build out at the same pace they are.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

10,682 次观看 • 9 个月前

Donald Trump, "I'm not happy with the European Union, and we're going to win that financial battle" "Absolutely put tariffs on European cars.. They have millions of cars coming in.. And they don't accept our cars.. We make great cars" "They don't have our farm products, we have the greatest farmers in the world" "Things are going to change.. This is not going to be a tough battle" "We'll be doing reciprocal tariffs, whatever they charge us we will charge them" "I don't know why people get upset about that because there's nothing more fair than that"
1:13

Donald Trump, "I'm not happy with the European Union, and we're going to win that financial battle" "Absolutely put tariffs on European cars.. They have millions of cars coming in.. And they don't accept our cars.. We make great cars" "They don't have our farm products, we have the greatest farmers in the world" "Things are going to change.. This is not going to be a tough battle" "We'll be doing reciprocal tariffs, whatever they charge us we will charge them" "I don't know why people get upset about that because there's nothing more fair than that"

Farrukh

2,131,021 次观看 • 1 年前