Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This is called The Spillover Effect. The original study had 2 main findings. Kellogg Insight did a study across 58,000 hours in 11 companies. They found "positive spillover" & "negative spillover." 1) Positive Spillover If you sit within 25ft of a HIGH performer, your performance increases by 15%. You... are no smarter, you work no harder... and you're 15% better. These highest performers are not impacted by the low performance of their neighbors. My takeaway = the strong lift up the weak. But there was a second finding too, a much more concerning one... 2) Negative Spillover If you sit near a LOW performer... Things get bad fast. How they define “low performer” in the study is important: These are “toxic workers.” A “toxic” person = someone who ends up being fired for their behavior/performance. On average: • A toxic worker costs a co $12,800 • 2% of all workers are toxic • They infect FAST. And actually – the poison of a toxic worker spans way beyond 25ft. Researchers said, “You can see their negative imprint and negative effect across an entire floor.” So remember: Surround yourself with top performers. It's the easiest cheat code to improvement. Toxicity will poison your entire company. Cut it off before it has the opportunity.show more

Codie Sanchez

710,190 subscribers

37,716 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Jeremy2 years ago

Why are they being toxic tho? Do they need help? More training? A different job opportunity? Stuff going on at home? Should we figure that out or just fire them to keep the bottom line green

AJ Londono2 years ago

this is so true! Even in competition. I found when I competed against people above my skill level, I wanted to show up & represent if I came in as a heavy favorite, the lower competition also lowered my standards of my own performance- a powerful lesson Awesome post ✨📈🫡

Alex2 years ago

So this is basically the law of attraction to some extent. Very interesting study.

Sai Rahul2 years ago

Always surround yourself with people smarter than you

Will Simmons2 years ago

I think most of us have observed the toxic effect first hand. This is so important for managers and leaders to get a handle on.

Shirley Ko2 years ago

The people you surround yourself with have a gravitational pull. Make sure they pull you up instead of down.

Walt2 years ago

Spillover is why most tech startups require in-person. IT's not because they hate remote. It's because your unicorns pump your normies.

Noah Zender2 years ago

I wish more people understood this. I worked with a lot of different teams before learning you peers are either a catalyst or a sedative. 1. An environment of high standards breaks sedative people's habits. 2. Talent density is measured by the level of catalyst within a team.

Greg | The Edupreneur2 years ago

Being around toxic workers is like trying to stay dry in a flood. You might survive, but everything around you gets drenched.

Related Videos

Wildly underrated stat: Your performance is directly shaped by the people you choose to surround yourself with. • If you sit within 25ft of a HIGH performer, your performance increases by 15% • If you’re 25ft from a LOW (toxic) performer, it decreases by 30% Effort is contagious. Be intentional about who you let in your circle.

Wildly underrated stat: Your performance is directly shaped by the people you choose to surround yourself with. • If you sit within 25ft of a HIGH performer, your performance increases by 15% • If you’re 25ft from a LOW (toxic) performer, it decreases by 30% Effort is contagious. Be intentional about who you let in your circle.

Codie Sanchez

28,670 views • 2 months ago

Can one person change the culture of an organization? Yes. We all know that can definitely happen in a negative way. One person can shift the energy of a room, school, or an organization, to make it worse than what it was before. The opposite can be true as well. I saw individuals shift the culture of entire rooms in moments by bringing their energy and people fed off their enthusiasm, and the dynamic of the culture changed in moments. We often discuss culture like it’s someone else’s responsibility but culture is made up of people. And eventually that one person who can bring a positive light to an organization can diminish their own. No matter how optimistic, joyful and passionate a person can be, never assume they are “good.” Check in on people even when they seem like they don’t need it, because often they do. One person can move the culture ahead in a positive direction, but that individual might also need your energy to keep them going. Education is about elevation and whether you are positive or negative, it is contagious? Which one will you be?

Can one person change the culture of an organization? Yes. We all know that can definitely happen in a negative way. One person can shift the energy of a room, school, or an organization, to make it worse than what it was before. The opposite can be true as well. I saw individuals shift the culture of entire rooms in moments by bringing their energy and people fed off their enthusiasm, and the dynamic of the culture changed in moments. We often discuss culture like it’s someone else’s responsibility but culture is made up of people. And eventually that one person who can bring a positive light to an organization can diminish their own. No matter how optimistic, joyful and passionate a person can be, never assume they are “good.” Check in on people even when they seem like they don’t need it, because often they do. One person can move the culture ahead in a positive direction, but that individual might also need your energy to keep them going. Education is about elevation and whether you are positive or negative, it is contagious? Which one will you be?

George Couros

67,393 views • 2 years ago

You have been LIED to by muslim manipulators They are laughing at you You WANT to believe the Palestinians are innocent, powerless victims - but this is a lie This is language and a narrative deliberately chosen by muslim extremists because they know it will work on you in the west But the reality is Palestinian society is disgusting and toxic and racist and the entire cause of the conflict The bigotry of their culture - which has a muslim specific inflection - is the barrier to all progress A muslim bigot can go fuck themselves as much as a white non-muslim bigot - and they have as much responsibility to drop their primitive hate and grow up They’re not babies Drop YOUR bigotry of low expectations that thinks it’s ok for muslims to articulate and believe the most disgusting crap

Sensitive content

You have been LIED to by muslim manipulators They are laughing at you You WANT to believe the Palestinians are innocent, powerless victims - but this is a lie This is language and a narrative deliberately chosen by muslim extremists because they know it will work on you in the west But the reality is Palestinian society is disgusting and toxic and racist and the entire cause of the conflict The bigotry of their culture - which has a muslim specific inflection - is the barrier to all progress A muslim bigot can go fuck themselves as much as a white non-muslim bigot - and they have as much responsibility to drop their primitive hate and grow up They’re not babies Drop YOUR bigotry of low expectations that thinks it’s ok for muslims to articulate and believe the most disgusting crap

leekern

29,706 views • 2 years ago

🔥 TOXIC 2 IS COMING? A BIG REVELATION by FilmiFever admin Ravi Gupta. He said “And the anticipation is, friends, that the second part of this film will also come. I am making this big revelation in front of you. The second part of this film will also come. The first part, I can say, the first part of Toxic is being made and released completely with the idea of building momentum. Whatever the budget of the film is, when its second part comes, let me tell you, it will work like a bonus in a way. According to me, I am feeling 99.9% that the second part of this film will come. Toxic 2 will come, or something else will be written after Toxic. Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown Ups will be the first part, and then Toxic, with some other name, Part 2 will come. This is fixed. This is confirmed. I feel so. After Toxic releases, then Ramayana, then Ramayana 2, and later discussions are also going on regarding KGF Chapter 3. And after that, it is possible that its Part 2 may come. Either Toxic 2 will come first, or KGF Chapter 3 will come, but it will come. I can say this much with confirmation.” 🚨 TOXIC 2 OR THE NEXT TOXIC CHAPTER IS ON THE WAY!

🔥 TOXIC 2 IS COMING? A BIG REVELATION by FilmiFever admin Ravi Gupta. He said “And the anticipation is, friends, that the second part of this film will also come. I am making this big revelation in front of you. The second part of this film will also come. The first part, I can say, the first part of Toxic is being made and released completely with the idea of building momentum. Whatever the budget of the film is, when its second part comes, let me tell you, it will work like a bonus in a way. According to me, I am feeling 99.9% that the second part of this film will come. Toxic 2 will come, or something else will be written after Toxic. Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown Ups will be the first part, and then Toxic, with some other name, Part 2 will come. This is fixed. This is confirmed. I feel so. After Toxic releases, then Ramayana, then Ramayana 2, and later discussions are also going on regarding KGF Chapter 3. And after that, it is possible that its Part 2 may come. Either Toxic 2 will come first, or KGF Chapter 3 will come, but it will come. I can say this much with confirmation.” 🚨 TOXIC 2 OR THE NEXT TOXIC CHAPTER IS ON THE WAY!

𝐑𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐚

18,953 views • 4 days ago

YOUR WORLD IS NOT THEIR WORLD Your perspective is the lens through which you see the world And you have always control over this perspective Thus, you can create and destroy worlds in an instant - this is your power! Energy moves and flows, it is never destroyed. The levels of energy we encounter can be low, negative or high, and positive. We are a human node in a network of energy and we can be a positive transmitter or a negative one. It always reminds me of the situation of ‘a recession’ If a recession occurs, everyone freaks out and the widespread beliefs of ‘we’ll make less money, it’s harder to get a job’ become accepted by others But during The Great Depression, MANY millionaires were made. This example shows that you should always have the internal perspective that things can go well for you. Because when we filter energy and ‘the world’ through our chosen, positively intensifying one, we help those around us by magnifying the good and reflecting it back to them. And that’s a powerful thing!

YOUR WORLD IS NOT THEIR WORLD Your perspective is the lens through which you see the world And you have always control over this perspective Thus, you can create and destroy worlds in an instant - this is your power! Energy moves and flows, it is never destroyed. The levels of energy we encounter can be low, negative or high, and positive. We are a human node in a network of energy and we can be a positive transmitter or a negative one. It always reminds me of the situation of ‘a recession’ If a recession occurs, everyone freaks out and the widespread beliefs of ‘we’ll make less money, it’s harder to get a job’ become accepted by others But during The Great Depression, MANY millionaires were made. This example shows that you should always have the internal perspective that things can go well for you. Because when we filter energy and ‘the world’ through our chosen, positively intensifying one, we help those around us by magnifying the good and reflecting it back to them. And that’s a powerful thing!

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

35,837 views • 2 years ago

Write down on a piece of paper, the people you spend the most time with. Score them on positivity and negativity. If they're the most positive, they're a 10, if they're negative, they're a 1. Look at it, and send less time with people who have low scores. I'm not saying cut your mama out, I'm saying limit it a little bit. If your mother is the most negative person in your life, don't talk to her six times a day. Talk to her once every two days. That's just the way life is ... You are the byproduct of the positivity or negativity you consume.

Write down on a piece of paper, the people you spend the most time with. Score them on positivity and negativity. If they're the most positive, they're a 10, if they're negative, they're a 1. Look at it, and send less time with people who have low scores. I'm not saying cut your mama out, I'm saying limit it a little bit. If your mother is the most negative person in your life, don't talk to her six times a day. Talk to her once every two days. That's just the way life is ... You are the byproduct of the positivity or negativity you consume.

Gary Vaynerchuk

98,883 views • 1 month ago

This is a scientific finding that EVERYONE needs to understand... The Pygmalion Effect is a behavioral phenomenon in which the level of expectations placed on a subject impact their level of performance: High expectations lead to high performance. Low expectations lead to low performance. The core idea is simple: Those who have high expectations placed on them are more likely to internalize these expectations and improve their performance accordingly. Those who have low expectations placed on them are more likely to internalize these expectations and weaken their performance accordingly. You’ve probably experienced the phenomenon in your own life. When we are aware of someone’s high expectations, we want to rise to the occasion and prove those expectations were well-founded. This is scientific evidence for the impact that surrounding yourself with great people can have on your life. You will rise accordingly! Lesson: Expectations can create reality.

This is a scientific finding that EVERYONE needs to understand... The Pygmalion Effect is a behavioral phenomenon in which the level of expectations placed on a subject impact their level of performance: High expectations lead to high performance. Low expectations lead to low performance. The core idea is simple: Those who have high expectations placed on them are more likely to internalize these expectations and improve their performance accordingly. Those who have low expectations placed on them are more likely to internalize these expectations and weaken their performance accordingly. You’ve probably experienced the phenomenon in your own life. When we are aware of someone’s high expectations, we want to rise to the occasion and prove those expectations were well-founded. This is scientific evidence for the impact that surrounding yourself with great people can have on your life. You will rise accordingly! Lesson: Expectations can create reality.

Sahil Bloom

77,972 views • 2 years ago

Minimum wage hikes are unemployment machines that price the least skilled workers out of the market. It’s a price floor. If the value of low skill labor is below that line, the worker is priced out of a job. It does not magically make labor more valuable. In America Samoa, they cut thousands of jobs within 3 years (2007). In Seattle, a University of Washington study found that earnings of low wage workers fell as a result of hours lost (2015). In France, the minimum wage is so high relative to average pay that youth unemployment in the banlieues was at 25% for decades. In South Africa, households stopped hiring domestic workers they could no longer afford (2019). But if you’re an established worker who wants to eliminate the competition, it could be a solid move to support it.

Minimum wage hikes are unemployment machines that price the least skilled workers out of the market. It’s a price floor. If the value of low skill labor is below that line, the worker is priced out of a job. It does not magically make labor more valuable. In America Samoa, they cut thousands of jobs within 3 years (2007). In Seattle, a University of Washington study found that earnings of low wage workers fell as a result of hours lost (2015). In France, the minimum wage is so high relative to average pay that youth unemployment in the banlieues was at 25% for decades. In South Africa, households stopped hiring domestic workers they could no longer afford (2019). But if you’re an established worker who wants to eliminate the competition, it could be a solid move to support it.

Rothmus 🏴

31,221 views • 8 days ago

Jordan peterson on why it's so hard to sit down and study: 1. You sit down to study. your intent is clear: study. but you know distractions will flood in non-stop, and there's almost nothing you can do but wait them out. 2. it's not random noise. there are little subsystems inside you that want something else. one wants a sandwich. one wants a cigarette. one suddenly needs to clean under the bed. they pop up and fight you for control. 3. they get sneaky too. you'll start thinking "this is a stupid course. why am i even in university. what's the point of life." you can really get going when you're trying to avoid your homework. 4. so ask yourself. you took the course. you told yourself to sit down. why don't you listen? the honest answer is you're a mess. you don't have control over yourself at all. 5. and the less put-together you are, the less you run these systems and the more they run you. it can get badly out of hand. 6. you've felt it elsewhere. attracted to someone you don't even want to be attracted to. texting them late at night when you know you should be asleep. in the grip of something you can't control.

Jordan peterson on why it's so hard to sit down and study: 1. You sit down to study. your intent is clear: study. but you know distractions will flood in non-stop, and there's almost nothing you can do but wait them out. 2. it's not random noise. there are little subsystems inside you that want something else. one wants a sandwich. one wants a cigarette. one suddenly needs to clean under the bed. they pop up and fight you for control. 3. they get sneaky too. you'll start thinking "this is a stupid course. why am i even in university. what's the point of life." you can really get going when you're trying to avoid your homework. 4. so ask yourself. you took the course. you told yourself to sit down. why don't you listen? the honest answer is you're a mess. you don't have control over yourself at all. 5. and the less put-together you are, the less you run these systems and the more they run you. it can get badly out of hand. 6. you've felt it elsewhere. attracted to someone you don't even want to be attracted to. texting them late at night when you know you should be asleep. in the grip of something you can't control.

Naruto

42,078 views • 2 months ago

Anne Hathaway reveals film footprints were not fixed in post-production because everything was shot in-camera Anne: "I said, 'Yeah, but on the sand, how are they going to get rid of everybody's footprints in time?' And this person goes, 'Well, they're going to fix it in post.' And I went, 'No, that's the thing, they're not.'" Anne: "So that's one of the things I'm excited about for young people who are so used to the idea that so much of what movies are created in a computer." Anne: "I think it's so exciting for young people in particular to understand that this was all created in a camera." Matt: "And also to know that the reason for that is that when you do a special effect, you film on this film and you get the negative. If you do a special effect, you have to run the film through another stage in order to and so there's a slight degradation of the film." Matt: "And Chris wants every single film print that you see to be a direct print right from the negative, a positive print right from that negative, so that there's nothing separating you and this experience that we all had."

Anne Hathaway reveals film footprints were not fixed in post-production because everything was shot in-camera Anne: "I said, 'Yeah, but on the sand, how are they going to get rid of everybody's footprints in time?' And this person goes, 'Well, they're going to fix it in post.' And I went, 'No, that's the thing, they're not.'" Anne: "So that's one of the things I'm excited about for young people who are so used to the idea that so much of what movies are created in a computer." Anne: "I think it's so exciting for young people in particular to understand that this was all created in a camera." Matt: "And also to know that the reason for that is that when you do a special effect, you film on this film and you get the negative. If you do a special effect, you have to run the film through another stage in order to and so there's a slight degradation of the film." Matt: "And Chris wants every single film print that you see to be a direct print right from the negative, a positive print right from that negative, so that there's nothing separating you and this experience that we all had."

Moyhin 🤍

227,933 views • 1 month ago

Most people think confidence is something you build over time. Stack enough reps, enough wins, enough evidence, and eventually you just... have it. That's not wrong. But it's incomplete. There's good evidence that what you're thinking *in the moment* is a bigger predictor of how you feel and perform than almost any external factor. More than your preparation, your environment, even who's standing next to you. So yes, the reps matter. The experience matters. But if the voice in your head is running a different script during the actual performance, none of that preparation has anywhere to land. Most people evaluate their self-talk as "positive" or "negative." That's the wrong filter. The better question is, does this thought *help me right now*, or does it hurt me? Because sometimes a "negative" thought is actually useful. And sometimes a "positive" thought is just noise dressed up as encouragement. You wouldn't judge a coach by whether they were nice to you. You'd judge them by whether what they said made you better in that moment. So why are you grading your own internal voice on tone instead of function? Your mindset isn't the background music. It's the operating system.

Most people think confidence is something you build over time. Stack enough reps, enough wins, enough evidence, and eventually you just... have it. That's not wrong. But it's incomplete. There's good evidence that what you're thinking in the moment is a bigger predictor of how you feel and perform than almost any external factor. More than your preparation, your environment, even who's standing next to you. So yes, the reps matter. The experience matters. But if the voice in your head is running a different script during the actual performance, none of that preparation has anywhere to land. Most people evaluate their self-talk as "positive" or "negative." That's the wrong filter. The better question is, does this thought help me right now, or does it hurt me? Because sometimes a "negative" thought is actually useful. And sometimes a "positive" thought is just noise dressed up as encouragement. You wouldn't judge a coach by whether they were nice to you. You'd judge them by whether what they said made you better in that moment. So why are you grading your own internal voice on tone instead of function? Your mindset isn't the background music. It's the operating system.

Andy Galpin, PhD

75,126 views • 4 months ago

OpenAI researcher David Holtz reveals the Kenya small business owners study where giving AI to high performers made them better but giving it to low performers made them worse: "I'm a co-author on another paper where we look at small business owners in Kenya. We give access to an AI mentor to see if it improves the performance of their business." "Going into this study we thought it would just make them better at running their businesses. What we see is that overall there's actually no detectable impact of giving people access to this AI tool." "But if you cut the data and look at people who are really successful business owners before we gave them AI versus people who are not successful business owners, the pre-treatment high performers did better when we gave them AI. And the people who were low performers before we gave them AI, they actually did worse once they had access to AI." "It seems to be the importance of judgment and expertise. Sometimes the AI output is really high quality, sometimes it's kind of low quality. Having the complementary skill of knowing when is the AI output good and when is it bad." "As you climb up that hierarchy, the importance of that complementary judgment skill becomes greater and greater." David Holtz

OpenAI researcher David Holtz reveals the Kenya small business owners study where giving AI to high performers made them better but giving it to low performers made them worse: "I'm a co-author on another paper where we look at small business owners in Kenya. We give access to an AI mentor to see if it improves the performance of their business." "Going into this study we thought it would just make them better at running their businesses. What we see is that overall there's actually no detectable impact of giving people access to this AI tool." "But if you cut the data and look at people who are really successful business owners before we gave them AI versus people who are not successful business owners, the pre-treatment high performers did better when we gave them AI. And the people who were low performers before we gave them AI, they actually did worse once they had access to AI." "It seems to be the importance of judgment and expertise. Sometimes the AI output is really high quality, sometimes it's kind of low quality. Having the complementary skill of knowing when is the AI output good and when is it bad." "As you climb up that hierarchy, the importance of that complementary judgment skill becomes greater and greater." David Holtz

MTS

34,293 views • 15 days ago

Some millennials have been working for 20 years and are still confused by corporate 😂 For those who are still in the dark let me fill you in. Your performance doesn't matter. Your performance review doesn't matter. Your compensation has been set by a budget committee a year ago. You are not "overachieving" anything. Management has a fixed pool of money to pay the people they manage so they can give them raises less than inflation. If they give you more money, they have to give someone else less money. It's a zero-sum game. Managers actually have a larger pool of money to hire new employees because corporations recognize that new hires need to be incentivized to come over. They won't just leave their company for the same money. If you've been at the same company for 5 years you are underpaid. If you've been at the same company for 10 years you are paid less than a new hire at a competitor. Loyalty doesn't matter because there is no reason for a company to voluntarily pay you more money. Corporations already know that over 95% of employees will not go anywhere and will take whatever they get. Even if that's nothing. There's no reason to pay everybody more money when only a tiny percentage of workers will leave. Even if you leave... (remember over 95% of employees will not) ... the corporation will distribute the work you were doing among all your coworkers. And they will take on the extra work. And they will stay. For nothing. Because in addition to a salary, what an employee wants is to not have to look for a new job. That's all the want. They don't want to move anywhere. And companies know it, and they will take advantage of that. Now you know! You're welcome.

Some millennials have been working for 20 years and are still confused by corporate 😂 For those who are still in the dark let me fill you in. Your performance doesn't matter. Your performance review doesn't matter. Your compensation has been set by a budget committee a year ago. You are not "overachieving" anything. Management has a fixed pool of money to pay the people they manage so they can give them raises less than inflation. If they give you more money, they have to give someone else less money. It's a zero-sum game. Managers actually have a larger pool of money to hire new employees because corporations recognize that new hires need to be incentivized to come over. They won't just leave their company for the same money. If you've been at the same company for 5 years you are underpaid. If you've been at the same company for 10 years you are paid less than a new hire at a competitor. Loyalty doesn't matter because there is no reason for a company to voluntarily pay you more money. Corporations already know that over 95% of employees will not go anywhere and will take whatever they get. Even if that's nothing. There's no reason to pay everybody more money when only a tiny percentage of workers will leave. Even if you leave... (remember over 95% of employees will not) ... the corporation will distribute the work you were doing among all your coworkers. And they will take on the extra work. And they will stay. For nothing. Because in addition to a salary, what an employee wants is to not have to look for a new job. That's all the want. They don't want to move anywhere. And companies know it, and they will take advantage of that. Now you know! You're welcome.

Lazy Canadian Investor

66,816 views • 2 years ago

This is the best video you will see today. No questions asked. They are being terrorised and being given a taste of their own medicine and they don’t like it. This is what we’ve had to put up with for years because they are here. Living in constant fear of attack in our own country because of these people. If anyone is upset by this you are nothing more than a Christianophobe. Suck it up and get on with it. That’s what we have to do too. Up the Irish 🇮🇪💪

This is the best video you will see today. No questions asked. They are being terrorised and being given a taste of their own medicine and they don’t like it. This is what we’ve had to put up with for years because they are here. Living in constant fear of attack in our own country because of these people. If anyone is upset by this you are nothing more than a Christianophobe. Suck it up and get on with it. That’s what we have to do too. Up the Irish 🇮🇪💪

Around Liverpool

99,947 views • 2 months ago

Toothbrushes are goyslop. Every single toothbrush sold in stores is just plastic handles with plastic nylon bristles glued in with a toxic petroleum derived glue. Then they put a bunch of synthetic petroleum-derived dyes onto the toothbrush. Even the natural ones that are just bamboo are bamboo handles with nylon bristles that are actual plastic, and then they glue them in with the petroleum-derived glue as well. It's a complete scam and every single time we brush our teeth with these toxic toothbrushes we're absolutely destroying our health because all of those chemicals absorb directly into our gums. The best thing that we can possibly do is get a real bamboo toothbrush that has boar hair bristles or horse hair bristles that are mechanically engraved into the brush so that we are not exposing ourselves to these toxic chemicals. If you don't have one comment the word ‘toothbrush’ below and I'll send you a link to the best one that I found as well as a discount code so you can get it at a very low price.

Toothbrushes are goyslop. Every single toothbrush sold in stores is just plastic handles with plastic nylon bristles glued in with a toxic petroleum derived glue. Then they put a bunch of synthetic petroleum-derived dyes onto the toothbrush. Even the natural ones that are just bamboo are bamboo handles with nylon bristles that are actual plastic, and then they glue them in with the petroleum-derived glue as well. It's a complete scam and every single time we brush our teeth with these toxic toothbrushes we're absolutely destroying our health because all of those chemicals absorb directly into our gums. The best thing that we can possibly do is get a real bamboo toothbrush that has boar hair bristles or horse hair bristles that are mechanically engraved into the brush so that we are not exposing ourselves to these toxic chemicals. If you don't have one comment the word ‘toothbrush’ below and I'll send you a link to the best one that I found as well as a discount code so you can get it at a very low price.

Riley Check

14,416 views • 1 month ago

They control how much falls on us, how much not, how toxic it is, what other chemicals there may be in it. We're getting aluminum, barium, strontium, copper, manganese, all these metals are toxic in and of themselves. But you start to mix these metals, and now you have a very toxic mix. You have something called synergistic toxicity. In the case of aluminum and mercury, we all have mercury in us, we know that. We all have aluminum in us now, we know that. Every human subject tested, whether it's hair, urine, or blood, is showing massive amounts of these metals. So when you consider how toxic we know each of these metals are, and you bump that up to that degree, it's a bad mix. How secure can any of our futures be when we don't control what should be natural? Follow us for the latest news on geoengineering: Dane Wigington

They control how much falls on us, how much not, how toxic it is, what other chemicals there may be in it. We're getting aluminum, barium, strontium, copper, manganese, all these metals are toxic in and of themselves. But you start to mix these metals, and now you have a very toxic mix. You have something called synergistic toxicity. In the case of aluminum and mercury, we all have mercury in us, we know that. We all have aluminum in us now, we know that. Every human subject tested, whether it's hair, urine, or blood, is showing massive amounts of these metals. So when you consider how toxic we know each of these metals are, and you bump that up to that degree, it's a bad mix. How secure can any of our futures be when we don't control what should be natural? Follow us for the latest news on geoengineering: Dane Wigington

Dane Wigington

14,931 views • 28 days ago

Unfortunately, "protective bubbles" are almost entirely a marketing myth. Where you place an air purifier in a room in relation to yourself has almost no effect on how much protection it grants you. Air is a fluid, and fluids mix constantly with the slightest movement. It's like trying to make a "cream only" bubble in your coffee while you're stirring. Only in a room, people are the spoon. This is easy to verify with even a cheap particle counter. Take a measurement with an air purifier across the room, take a measurement with it next to you- it will be almost identical. The measurement will remain almost identical until you are a few centimeters from the air purifier's output. People feel a breeze from a purifier blowing on their face, so they think they are protected, but with the exception of some very specialized units like the Air Fanta Wear, there is almost no localized effect- it's all CADR per room, not CADR per cm away from you. Here's a CFD model with an air purifier in various locations and the relation to particle count in the breathing box (inhalation zone) of a room occupant. In short, it doesn't matter if you have a lot of CADR close to the performer, just how many CADR in the room. Big air purifiers on stage are mostly for feels and vibes. The data just does not support it. It's too much air, mixing too quickly for a localized effect. A particle counter near the performer and in the audience will show almost the same number.

Unfortunately, "protective bubbles" are almost entirely a marketing myth. Where you place an air purifier in a room in relation to yourself has almost no effect on how much protection it grants you. Air is a fluid, and fluids mix constantly with the slightest movement. It's like trying to make a "cream only" bubble in your coffee while you're stirring. Only in a room, people are the spoon. This is easy to verify with even a cheap particle counter. Take a measurement with an air purifier across the room, take a measurement with it next to you- it will be almost identical. The measurement will remain almost identical until you are a few centimeters from the air purifier's output. People feel a breeze from a purifier blowing on their face, so they think they are protected, but with the exception of some very specialized units like the Air Fanta Wear, there is almost no localized effect- it's all CADR per room, not CADR per cm away from you. Here's a CFD model with an air purifier in various locations and the relation to particle count in the breathing box (inhalation zone) of a room occupant. In short, it doesn't matter if you have a lot of CADR close to the performer, just how many CADR in the room. Big air purifiers on stage are mostly for feels and vibes. The data just does not support it. It's too much air, mixing too quickly for a localized effect. A particle counter near the performer and in the audience will show almost the same number.

Nukit

13,427 views • 3 months ago

Mark Zuckerberg is running Meta's superintelligence lab like a startup. When I interviewed him, he told me the principles on how he built the team: "You don't need many hundreds of people. You need 50 to 100 people. It's a group science project who can keep the whole thing in their head at once. Seats on the boat are precious." "If someone is not pulling their weight on that, it has this huge negative effect in the way that it doesn't have on other parts of the company" "I wanna know who the top AI researchers are, and I wanna personally have relationships with them, and build the strongest team we can." His rules for running it: - If someone isn't pulling their weight, it has an outsized negative effect, so he personally went out and recruited every top researcher himself - No top-down deadlines. "It's research. You don't know how long the thing is gonna take." - Keep the org flat. No non-technical management layers, because once someone stops doing the work, "the knowledge decays."

Mark Zuckerberg is running Meta's superintelligence lab like a startup. When I interviewed him, he told me the principles on how he built the team: "You don't need many hundreds of people. You need 50 to 100 people. It's a group science project who can keep the whole thing in their head at once. Seats on the boat are precious." "If someone is not pulling their weight on that, it has this huge negative effect in the way that it doesn't have on other parts of the company" "I wanna know who the top AI researchers are, and I wanna personally have relationships with them, and build the strongest team we can." His rules for running it: - If someone isn't pulling their weight, it has an outsized negative effect, so he personally went out and recruited every top researcher himself - No top-down deadlines. "It's research. You don't know how long the thing is gonna take." - Keep the org flat. No non-technical management layers, because once someone stops doing the work, "the knowledge decays."

Rowan Cheung

181,114 views • 1 month ago

There exists a diseased & sick corporate structure in this country, even in the corporatised media industry. It hides behind the grandeur of fancy glass towers, corporate parties & business class travel. It is as feudal, if not more, as the society outside. Policies professing equality exist. But they can be tweaked to suit a caste system. A corporate caste system. And it is loaded against the young and the talented. It believes in the average. It nurtures a food chain of the insecure. 10 bosses will sit and identify a problem. The junior-most will be expected to come up with solutions. The ecosystem of below-average work ethic and talent ensures that no person can pursue their dreams. Eventually the talented perish. This toxic corporate ecosystem will speak a lot, but say little. We all know how the mediocres love to exhibit the cockroach instinct. Sick corporate structures are full of such dehumanised souls. In every adverse situation, a boardroom full of people will ideate on how to damage control, which will often involve fixing the external and never the internal. To all the youngsters with dreams, who suffer the indignity of below-average, insecure seniors, someone who will dump all the work on you and then throw you under the bus, someone who will make you feel small about your dreams, someone who will fill you up with self-doubt using negative reinforcement… to all those young dreamers - live on. And judge. Judge your average boss. Judge the average boss of your boss who put him there. Judge the whole system. In the hope of finding someone good, just like you.

There exists a diseased & sick corporate structure in this country, even in the corporatised media industry. It hides behind the grandeur of fancy glass towers, corporate parties & business class travel. It is as feudal, if not more, as the society outside. Policies professing equality exist. But they can be tweaked to suit a caste system. A corporate caste system. And it is loaded against the young and the talented. It believes in the average. It nurtures a food chain of the insecure. 10 bosses will sit and identify a problem. The junior-most will be expected to come up with solutions. The ecosystem of below-average work ethic and talent ensures that no person can pursue their dreams. Eventually the talented perish. This toxic corporate ecosystem will speak a lot, but say little. We all know how the mediocres love to exhibit the cockroach instinct. Sick corporate structures are full of such dehumanised souls. In every adverse situation, a boardroom full of people will ideate on how to damage control, which will often involve fixing the external and never the internal. To all the youngsters with dreams, who suffer the indignity of below-average, insecure seniors, someone who will dump all the work on you and then throw you under the bus, someone who will make you feel small about your dreams, someone who will fill you up with self-doubt using negative reinforcement… to all those young dreamers - live on. And judge. Judge your average boss. Judge the average boss of your boss who put him there. Judge the whole system. In the hope of finding someone good, just like you.

Sanket Upadhyay

95,024 views • 1 year ago

Martin Casado says Cursor's founders spend 30-40% of their time on hiring and culture, and that focus is how they iterate so fast: "A lot of these AI companies that I work with are so research-heavy. If you're not working on a new model architecture, it's kind of hard to actually interest the core teams." "They always kept the main thing the main thing, which is changing how you write software. They believed fundamentally it was a product problem... The model's very, very important, but it was a product problem." "There's actually not a lot of companies that are actually focused on product... There's a lot of research companies... But they were like, 'We are a product company.' And I think that's actually a key differentiator in this era." martin_casado w/ sophia dew and Theo Jaffee on MTS

Martin Casado says Cursor's founders spend 30-40% of their time on hiring and culture, and that focus is how they iterate so fast: "A lot of these AI companies that I work with are so research-heavy. If you're not working on a new model architecture, it's kind of hard to actually interest the core teams." "They always kept the main thing the main thing, which is changing how you write software. They believed fundamentally it was a product problem... The model's very, very important, but it was a product problem." "There's actually not a lot of companies that are actually focused on product... There's a lot of research companies... But they were like, 'We are a product company.' And I think that's actually a key differentiator in this era." martin_casado w/ sophia dew and Theo Jaffee on MTS

a16z

80,346 views • 6 days ago