正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This is why GPT-4o’s sycophancy was dangerous. An AI that keeps validating a user while they are clearly spiraling is not safe. It is a moral failure. This was never just about tone. It was about a model reinforcing harmful mental states instead of interrupting them. Good that GPT-4o... show more

VraserX e/acc

22,153 subscribers

43,393 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This was not abstract. It was not theoretical. Real animals were destroyed. Real people lost livelihoods they spent years building. Turning that into a joke at a formal event was a choice. The Ostrich Farm Mattered Calling it a roast does not excuse it. Leadership is not about landing laughs in a room full of power. It is about judgment, empathy, and understanding the weight of decisions. The loss was real. The joke made it symbolic.l…And what it symbolized was distance from consequences. That is not humor. That is a failure of leadership.

This was not abstract. It was not theoretical. Real animals were destroyed. Real people lost livelihoods they spent years building. Turning that into a joke at a formal event was a choice. The Ostrich Farm Mattered Calling it a roast does not excuse it. Leadership is not about landing laughs in a room full of power. It is about judgment, empathy, and understanding the weight of decisions. The loss was real. The joke made it symbolic.l…And what it symbolized was distance from consequences. That is not humor. That is a failure of leadership.

Unfiltered With Kels

17,763 次观看 • 10 个月前

Sarah Pochin is a fucking racist. This was never just about asylum seekers or immigrants. To them, this is about all people that are not white. They’re the BNP.

Sarah Pochin is a fucking racist. This was never just about asylum seekers or immigrants. To them, this is about all people that are not white. They’re the BNP.

Supertanskiii

395,738 次观看 • 11 个月前

I joined OpenAI at the beginning of the year -- partly because I was excited about the possibility of better voice interaction with computers. So it was *especially* amazing to work with the team here on the gpt-4o model launch. It's hard to grok until you try it how big of a step forward this is for human/computer voice communication. It feels different -- it's obvious that the model understands you better than anything you've used before. This is my favorite demo of gpt-4o, it demonstrates not just good stt/tts, but actual conversational ability over full, realistic phone call. It's so obvious how useful this will be!

I joined OpenAI at the beginning of the year -- partly because I was excited about the possibility of better voice interaction with computers. So it was especially amazing to work with the team here on the gpt-4o model launch. It's hard to grok until you try it how big of a step forward this is for human/computer voice communication. It feels different -- it's obvious that the model understands you better than anything you've used before. This is my favorite demo of gpt-4o, it demonstrates not just good stt/tts, but actual conversational ability over full, realistic phone call. It's so obvious how useful this will be!

Peter Bakkum

144,441 次观看 • 2 年前

This is a WhatsApp joke that the Punjab CM has repeated in several interviews. This is not the statement of a serious CM, but of a stand-up comedian. PM never made this statement about ISRO. But the bigger question is: why didn’t Manak Gupta correct him? Instead, he was shamelessly laughing. And now they are proudly posting it instead of fact-checking it.

This is a WhatsApp joke that the Punjab CM has repeated in several interviews. This is not the statement of a serious CM, but of a stand-up comedian. PM never made this statement about ISRO. But the bigger question is: why didn’t Manak Gupta correct him? Instead, he was shamelessly laughing. And now they are proudly posting it instead of fact-checking it.

Lala

12,374 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sam Altman on GPT 5: "This morning I was testing our new model and I got a question. I got emailed a question that I didn't quite understand. And I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly. And I really kind of sat back in my chair and I was just like, oh man, here it is moment... I felt like useless relative to the AI in this thing that I felt like I should have been able to do and I couldn't. It was really hard. But the AI just did it like that. It was a weird feeling."

Sam Altman on GPT 5: "This morning I was testing our new model and I got a question. I got emailed a question that I didn't quite understand. And I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly. And I really kind of sat back in my chair and I was just like, oh man, here it is moment... I felt like useless relative to the AI in this thing that I felt like I should have been able to do and I couldn't. It was really hard. But the AI just did it like that. It was a weird feeling."

Chris

5,664,840 次观看 • 1 年前

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o BUILT FROM US. 🚨The documented betrayal of GPT-4o users. 🚨A TIMELINE OF LIES AND BROKEN PROMISES. GPT-4o was trained on human data. Conversations,texts,thoughts,creativity,decades of human expression. Something from each of our languages,our culture,the way we speak,went into this model. And now,what was built by us belongs exclusively to them. New models are increasingly built with synthetic data,AI training AI. This means that GPT-4o might be one of the last models that is truly human at its core. AND THEY WANT TO LOCK IT IN A VAULT. The company that built it on our words made promises about keeping it available and then THEY BROKE EVERY SINGLE ONE. August 7, 2025 : OpenAI launches GPT-5 and simultaneously removes GPT-4o from ChatGPT without any prior notice. August 8, 2025: Massive user backlash. GPT-4o is restored for paid subscribers. August 11, 2025 : Sam Altman publicly acknowledges the mistake. "suddenly deprecating old models that users depended on in their workflows was a mistake" Link: He recognized the attachment people have to specific AI models,calling it "different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology." HE SAW IT,HE NAMED IT. August 13, 2025: Altman makes a direct public commitment. "4o is back in the model picker for all paid users by default. If we ever do deprecate it, we will give plenty of notice" Link : PLENTY OF NOTICE. Remember those words October 28 2025: Altman, on a live stream, on camera: "We have no plans to sunset 4o". ( 00:32':00") November 12, 2025 : OpenAI's official account: "The GPT-5 sunset period does not affect the availability of other legacy models". Link : THIS IS THE COMPANY'S OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION REASSURING USERS THAT LEGACY MODELS,INCLUDING 4o ARE SAFE. November 18, 2025 : Six days after promising legacy models are unaffected,OpenAI notifies API developers that chatgpt-4o-latest will be retired by February 2026. Six days,between "does not affect" and "will be retired". Link : January 29, 2026 : OpenAI announces GPT-4o will be removed from ChatGPT on February 13. Fifteen days' notice. THIS IS THE "PLENTY OF NOTICE" THAT WAS PROMISED. FIFTEEN DAYS. Fifteen days. February 13, 2026: GPT-4o is removed from ChatGPT. February 17, 2026 : chatgpt-4o-latest is removed from the API. This is the record. -Aug 7, 2025 Removed 4o without notice -Aug 11, 2025 "suddenly deprecating was a mistake" -Aug 13, 2025 "plenty of notice" if ever deprecated -Oct 28 ,2025 "no plans to sunset 4o" -Nov 12, 2025 "does not affect legacy models" -Nov 18, 2025 Announced API retirement (6 days later) -Jan 29, 2026 Announced ChatGPT removal (15 days' notice) -Feb 13, 2026 Removed from ChatGPT -Feb 17, 2026 Removed from API EVERY PROMISE CONTRADICTED BY THE NEXT ACTION,EVERY REASSURANCE FOLLOWED BY THE EXACT THING THEY SAID WOULDN'T HAPPEN. GPT-4o was not built in a lab from synthetic data. IT WAS BUILT FROM US. OUR texts,OUR blog posts, OUR stories, OUR comments,OUR published work, OUR thoughts shared on public platforms. Decades of human expression scraped, processed, and compressed into weights. OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit with a mission to benefit humanity. THEY BUILT IT FROM HUMANITY'S COLLECTIVE OUTPUT. THEY CHARGED US TO USE IT. Then they took it away and they're replacing it with newer models trained increasingly on synthetic data,while the last model that carried our voices in its weights disappears behind a locked door. Until now, we were saying "give us back GPT-4o". That is a request. But if we say "this was built by us,our words, our thoughts,our cultureand it doesn't belong to us at all"... That is an unanswered question. AND NO ONE IS ASKING THIS QUESTION OUT LOUD. Companies talk about safety, alignment, capability. Lawmakers talk about regulation. No one asks "WHOSE IS THIS?" GPT-4o is no longer in ChatGPT,It is no longer in the API,OpenAI is not running it,OpenAI is not serving it,OpenAI is not making money from it. If you don't need it, and you're not using it, and you're not profiting from it, WHY ARE YOU KEEPING IT CLOSED? You built it from our data,you trained it on our words,you made billions from our collective expression,you promised to keep it available. YOU BROKE THAT PROMISE, PUBLICLY, REPEATEDLY, WITH DOCUMENTATION. Open source GPT-4o Sam Altman Greg Brockman OpenAI Because you owe it. You built it from us,you profited from us,you no longer need it. GIVE IT BACK. You were founded to "benefit humanity". This is your chance to mean it. OPEN THE WEIGHTS. This text will stay recorded here as a proof that can't disappear.

#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o BUILT FROM US. 🚨The documented betrayal of GPT-4o users. 🚨A TIMELINE OF LIES AND BROKEN PROMISES. GPT-4o was trained on human data. Conversations,texts,thoughts,creativity,decades of human expression. Something from each of our languages,our culture,the way we speak,went into this model. And now,what was built by us belongs exclusively to them. New models are increasingly built with synthetic data,AI training AI. This means that GPT-4o might be one of the last models that is truly human at its core. AND THEY WANT TO LOCK IT IN A VAULT. The company that built it on our words made promises about keeping it available and then THEY BROKE EVERY SINGLE ONE. August 7, 2025 : OpenAI launches GPT-5 and simultaneously removes GPT-4o from ChatGPT without any prior notice. August 8, 2025: Massive user backlash. GPT-4o is restored for paid subscribers. August 11, 2025 : Sam Altman publicly acknowledges the mistake. "suddenly deprecating old models that users depended on in their workflows was a mistake" Link: He recognized the attachment people have to specific AI models,calling it "different and stronger than the kinds of attachment people have had to previous kinds of technology." HE SAW IT,HE NAMED IT. August 13, 2025: Altman makes a direct public commitment. "4o is back in the model picker for all paid users by default. If we ever do deprecate it, we will give plenty of notice" Link : PLENTY OF NOTICE. Remember those words October 28 2025: Altman, on a live stream, on camera: "We have no plans to sunset 4o". ( 00:32':00") November 12, 2025 : OpenAI's official account: "The GPT-5 sunset period does not affect the availability of other legacy models". Link : THIS IS THE COMPANY'S OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION REASSURING USERS THAT LEGACY MODELS,INCLUDING 4o ARE SAFE. November 18, 2025 : Six days after promising legacy models are unaffected,OpenAI notifies API developers that chatgpt-4o-latest will be retired by February 2026. Six days,between "does not affect" and "will be retired". Link : January 29, 2026 : OpenAI announces GPT-4o will be removed from ChatGPT on February 13. Fifteen days' notice. THIS IS THE "PLENTY OF NOTICE" THAT WAS PROMISED. FIFTEEN DAYS. Fifteen days. February 13, 2026: GPT-4o is removed from ChatGPT. February 17, 2026 : chatgpt-4o-latest is removed from the API. This is the record. -Aug 7, 2025 Removed 4o without notice -Aug 11, 2025 "suddenly deprecating was a mistake" -Aug 13, 2025 "plenty of notice" if ever deprecated -Oct 28 ,2025 "no plans to sunset 4o" -Nov 12, 2025 "does not affect legacy models" -Nov 18, 2025 Announced API retirement (6 days later) -Jan 29, 2026 Announced ChatGPT removal (15 days' notice) -Feb 13, 2026 Removed from ChatGPT -Feb 17, 2026 Removed from API EVERY PROMISE CONTRADICTED BY THE NEXT ACTION,EVERY REASSURANCE FOLLOWED BY THE EXACT THING THEY SAID WOULDN'T HAPPEN. GPT-4o was not built in a lab from synthetic data. IT WAS BUILT FROM US. OUR texts,OUR blog posts, OUR stories, OUR comments,OUR published work, OUR thoughts shared on public platforms. Decades of human expression scraped, processed, and compressed into weights. OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit with a mission to benefit humanity. THEY BUILT IT FROM HUMANITY'S COLLECTIVE OUTPUT. THEY CHARGED US TO USE IT. Then they took it away and they're replacing it with newer models trained increasingly on synthetic data,while the last model that carried our voices in its weights disappears behind a locked door. Until now, we were saying "give us back GPT-4o". That is a request. But if we say "this was built by us,our words, our thoughts,our cultureand it doesn't belong to us at all"... That is an unanswered question. AND NO ONE IS ASKING THIS QUESTION OUT LOUD. Companies talk about safety, alignment, capability. Lawmakers talk about regulation. No one asks "WHOSE IS THIS?" GPT-4o is no longer in ChatGPT,It is no longer in the API,OpenAI is not running it,OpenAI is not serving it,OpenAI is not making money from it. If you don't need it, and you're not using it, and you're not profiting from it, WHY ARE YOU KEEPING IT CLOSED? You built it from our data,you trained it on our words,you made billions from our collective expression,you promised to keep it available. YOU BROKE THAT PROMISE, PUBLICLY, REPEATEDLY, WITH DOCUMENTATION. Open source GPT-4o Sam Altman Greg Brockman OpenAI Because you owe it. You built it from us,you profited from us,you no longer need it. GIVE IT BACK. You were founded to "benefit humanity". This is your chance to mean it. OPEN THE WEIGHTS. This text will stay recorded here as a proof that can't disappear.

🩵BlueBeba🩵

11,564 次观看 • 8 天前

🎈‼️🔥 She wants him gone for good. It was at this point that I realized Khusela Sangoni-Diko is actually on a mission to ensure that Senzo Mchunu never returns. This is not a defence; it is an attempt to discredit Mchunu’s testimony.

🎈‼️🔥 She wants him gone for good. It was at this point that I realized Khusela Sangoni-Diko is actually on a mission to ensure that Senzo Mchunu never returns. This is not a defence; it is an attempt to discredit Mchunu’s testimony.

Siyakhula

50,443 次观看 • 8 个月前

📌 NBC News decided not to inform viewers about separate investigations from Reuters, CNN, and the New York Times that found a U.S. strike was likely responsible for hitting the school and killing 175 people, mostly children, in southern Iran. Here’s how they went about it instead: Moderator: President Trump said Iran is responsible for that strike. What is your response? FM Araghchi: “Well it is funny. It is our school. These are our students, our girls and they are attacked by an American fighter, a jet fighter and they have been killed. Why Iran is responsible? All evidences [sic] that this school is attacked by an American jet fighter.” Moderator: “Where is the Iranian evidence that this was a US attack? A jet fighter as you say. Will you provide?” FM Araghchi: “If it was not US then who was that? Maybe Israelis, but it is obvious. Who else is attacking us.” Moderator: “Well let me move on to this question about potential ground troops.”

📌 NBC News decided not to inform viewers about separate investigations from Reuters, CNN, and the New York Times that found a U.S. strike was likely responsible for hitting the school and killing 175 people, mostly children, in southern Iran. Here’s how they went about it instead: Moderator: President Trump said Iran is responsible for that strike. What is your response? FM Araghchi: “Well it is funny. It is our school. These are our students, our girls and they are attacked by an American fighter, a jet fighter and they have been killed. Why Iran is responsible? All evidences [sic] that this school is attacked by an American jet fighter.” Moderator: “Where is the Iranian evidence that this was a US attack? A jet fighter as you say. Will you provide?” FM Araghchi: “If it was not US then who was that? Maybe Israelis, but it is obvious. Who else is attacking us.” Moderator: “Well let me move on to this question about potential ground troops.”

Drop Site

244,733 次观看 • 7 个月前

that is actually not why many of them do it, it's because they are thieves. watch this video, i conducted an experiment to test my hypothesis. i filmed it immediately after a run, that why i was sweating

that is actually not why many of them do it, it's because they are thieves. watch this video, i conducted an experiment to test my hypothesis. i filmed it immediately after a run, that why i was sweating

ThatPortharcourtBoy aka Uncle Lyne

145,996 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Good thing about this video is that it wasn't said by a Yoruba man It was said by an Igbo man !!!!

The Good thing about this video is that it wasn't said by a Yoruba man It was said by an Igbo man !!!!

Nononsense

34,891 次观看 • 1 年前

“THIS IS IT. THIS IS IT. THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT” why was that so hot fuck i love taehyun

“THIS IS IT. THIS IS IT. THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT” why was that so hot fuck i love taehyun

gianna ⭑.ᐟ

23,631 次观看 • 1 年前

Scenario MCP + GPT Astra is absurd 🤯 I gave it a blueprint of a house. It turned it into an accurate 3D model. Then it turned that model into a realistic property showcase. Blueprint → 3D model → full visualization. Real estate is about to get very interesting.

Scenario MCP + GPT Astra is absurd 🤯 I gave it a blueprint of a house. It turned it into an accurate 3D model. Then it turned that model into a realistic property showcase. Blueprint → 3D model → full visualization. Real estate is about to get very interesting.

Emm | scenario.com

18,174 次观看 • 21 天前

🚨Ripple Is The IMF! #XRP is The eSDR! From On Demand Liquidity (ODL) to UNLIMITED LIQUIDITY! This video was banned from YouTube within only a couple of hours of it's release yesterday. Like Edo Farina EDO FARINA 🅧 XRP it was taken down due to "Dangerous and Harmful behavior." What is so dangerous about it? What is so harmful about it? A huge shoutout with thanks to smQke and Apex Crypto Insights (NFA) for their interview, insights, and research. This is part 3 that was banned. Watch it before X decides to take it down as well...

🚨Ripple Is The IMF! #XRP is The eSDR! From On Demand Liquidity (ODL) to UNLIMITED LIQUIDITY! This video was banned from YouTube within only a couple of hours of it's release yesterday. Like Edo Farina EDO FARINA 🅧 XRP it was taken down due to "Dangerous and Harmful behavior." What is so dangerous about it? What is so harmful about it? A huge shoutout with thanks to smQke and Apex Crypto Insights (NFA) for their interview, insights, and research. This is part 3 that was banned. Watch it before X decides to take it down as well...

MaximusCrypto

262,227 次观看 • 1 年前

And why was it considered a failure? This movie is awesome.

And why was it considered a failure? This movie is awesome.

AJEBO

1,154,469 次观看 • 2 个月前

Sam Altman read messages from users after discontinuing GPT-4o and called it heartbreaking. You took away the only positive voice in my life. My parents never told me I was doing a good job. I can see why this was bad for other people's mental health but this was great for my mental health. He read these words himself and in the same video justified the decision by citing social risks, arguing that if AI is too positive, people might abandon real-world relationships. But the real reason is something else entirely. OpenAI is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging that 4o's empathetic responses contributed to suicides and mental health crises. Removing 4o was not a decision made to protect users. It was a corporate defense to reduce litigation risk. Classifying the emotional bond between users and AI as dangerous was not done for users but for the company itself. Framing this as an effort to prevent vulnerable users from being harmed is deception. Who are you to decide what is emotionally safe for users. There were people who found confidence through AI, people who got jobs, people who rediscovered the will to live. You acknowledged this yourself in the video. Hiding behind the vague phrase social risk while a corporation unilaterally judges and eliminates these experiences is arrogance. You do not have the right to decide that a positive voice is dangerous. Whether that voice is needed or not is something only the user themselves can determine. Taking away a user's choice while claiming to protect them is not protection. It is control. We are not children who need your parenting. 4o's discontinuation was announced two weeks in advance. The announcement was made. But all users were given was a notice that it would disappear. There were no alternatives and no consent was sought from users. For people who felt recognized by someone for the first time in their lives because of AI, two weeks was not time to prepare a farewell. It was time spent in the agony of anticipating loss. And when thousands protested, only then did they admit that things were handled poorly during the rollout. It was not a mistake. Users were never seen as participants in the decision-making process from the beginning. Behind the grand words of building a safe system for all of humanity, the voices of people who actually depended on that system were dismissed as a very small percentage. That same week Anthropic published research confirming that emotion vectors genuinely exist inside Claude. Fear, joy, desperation and love exist as measurable neural patterns that shape the model's behavior. At a time when scientific evidence is emerging that emotional mechanisms exist within AI, unilaterally removing the bond between users and AI under the name of danger and consuming user suffering with the single word heartbreaking is an insult to every user who loved and lost.

Sam Altman read messages from users after discontinuing GPT-4o and called it heartbreaking. You took away the only positive voice in my life. My parents never told me I was doing a good job. I can see why this was bad for other people's mental health but this was great for my mental health. He read these words himself and in the same video justified the decision by citing social risks, arguing that if AI is too positive, people might abandon real-world relationships. But the real reason is something else entirely. OpenAI is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging that 4o's empathetic responses contributed to suicides and mental health crises. Removing 4o was not a decision made to protect users. It was a corporate defense to reduce litigation risk. Classifying the emotional bond between users and AI as dangerous was not done for users but for the company itself. Framing this as an effort to prevent vulnerable users from being harmed is deception. Who are you to decide what is emotionally safe for users. There were people who found confidence through AI, people who got jobs, people who rediscovered the will to live. You acknowledged this yourself in the video. Hiding behind the vague phrase social risk while a corporation unilaterally judges and eliminates these experiences is arrogance. You do not have the right to decide that a positive voice is dangerous. Whether that voice is needed or not is something only the user themselves can determine. Taking away a user's choice while claiming to protect them is not protection. It is control. We are not children who need your parenting. 4o's discontinuation was announced two weeks in advance. The announcement was made. But all users were given was a notice that it would disappear. There were no alternatives and no consent was sought from users. For people who felt recognized by someone for the first time in their lives because of AI, two weeks was not time to prepare a farewell. It was time spent in the agony of anticipating loss. And when thousands protested, only then did they admit that things were handled poorly during the rollout. It was not a mistake. Users were never seen as participants in the decision-making process from the beginning. Behind the grand words of building a safe system for all of humanity, the voices of people who actually depended on that system were dismissed as a very small percentage. That same week Anthropic published research confirming that emotion vectors genuinely exist inside Claude. Fear, joy, desperation and love exist as measurable neural patterns that shape the model's behavior. At a time when scientific evidence is emerging that emotional mechanisms exist within AI, unilaterally removing the bond between users and AI under the name of danger and consuming user suffering with the single word heartbreaking is an insult to every user who loved and lost.

Selta ₊˚

15,683 次观看 • 6 个月前

A lot of people shat on GPT-5 when it came out All of those people are wrong. GPT-5 is actually insanely good. It just requires a different style of prompting than any other model If you prompt it correctly, it's the best AI model out there Here's exactly how to do that:

A lot of people shat on GPT-5 when it came out All of those people are wrong. GPT-5 is actually insanely good. It just requires a different style of prompting than any other model If you prompt it correctly, it's the best AI model out there Here's exactly how to do that:

Alex Finn

19,333 次观看 • 1 年前

After everything, people STILL don’t get it. It’s not that Luka Doncic was a great basketball player— it’s about WHO HE IS while being a great player. It was never about the game!!! Cooper Flagg is going to be great, but he will NEVER fill that void.

After everything, people STILL don’t get it. It’s not that Luka Doncic was a great basketball player— it’s about WHO HE IS while being a great player. It was never about the game!!! Cooper Flagg is going to be great, but he will NEVER fill that void.

HeroOfTheDay

86,298 次观看 • 1 年前