Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This is why GPT-4o’s sycophancy was dangerous. An AI that keeps validating a user while they are clearly spiraling is not safe. It is a moral failure. This was never just about tone. It was about a model reinforcing harmful mental states instead of interrupting them. Good that GPT-4o... show more

VraserX e/acc

22,153 subscribers

43,393 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This was not abstract. It was not theoretical. Real animals were destroyed. Real people lost livelihoods they spent years building. Turning that into a joke at a formal event was a choice. The Ostrich Farm Mattered Calling it a roast does not excuse it. Leadership is not about landing laughs in a room full of power. It is about judgment, empathy, and understanding the weight of decisions. The loss was real. The joke made it symbolic.l…And what it symbolized was distance from consequences. That is not humor. That is a failure of leadership.

This was not abstract. It was not theoretical. Real animals were destroyed. Real people lost livelihoods they spent years building. Turning that into a joke at a formal event was a choice. The Ostrich Farm Mattered Calling it a roast does not excuse it. Leadership is not about landing laughs in a room full of power. It is about judgment, empathy, and understanding the weight of decisions. The loss was real. The joke made it symbolic.l…And what it symbolized was distance from consequences. That is not humor. That is a failure of leadership.

Unfiltered With Kels

17,761 views • 8 months ago

Sarah Pochin is a fucking racist. This was never just about asylum seekers or immigrants. To them, this is about all people that are not white. They’re the BNP.

Sarah Pochin is a fucking racist. This was never just about asylum seekers or immigrants. To them, this is about all people that are not white. They’re the BNP.

Supertanskiii

395,659 views • 9 months ago

I joined OpenAI at the beginning of the year -- partly because I was excited about the possibility of better voice interaction with computers. So it was *especially* amazing to work with the team here on the gpt-4o model launch. It's hard to grok until you try it how big of a step forward this is for human/computer voice communication. It feels different -- it's obvious that the model understands you better than anything you've used before. This is my favorite demo of gpt-4o, it demonstrates not just good stt/tts, but actual conversational ability over full, realistic phone call. It's so obvious how useful this will be!

I joined OpenAI at the beginning of the year -- partly because I was excited about the possibility of better voice interaction with computers. So it was especially amazing to work with the team here on the gpt-4o model launch. It's hard to grok until you try it how big of a step forward this is for human/computer voice communication. It feels different -- it's obvious that the model understands you better than anything you've used before. This is my favorite demo of gpt-4o, it demonstrates not just good stt/tts, but actual conversational ability over full, realistic phone call. It's so obvious how useful this will be!

Peter Bakkum

144,441 views • 2 years ago

Sam Altman on GPT 5: "This morning I was testing our new model and I got a question. I got emailed a question that I didn't quite understand. And I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly. And I really kind of sat back in my chair and I was just like, oh man, here it is moment... I felt like useless relative to the AI in this thing that I felt like I should have been able to do and I couldn't. It was really hard. But the AI just did it like that. It was a weird feeling."

Sam Altman on GPT 5: "This morning I was testing our new model and I got a question. I got emailed a question that I didn't quite understand. And I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly. And I really kind of sat back in my chair and I was just like, oh man, here it is moment... I felt like useless relative to the AI in this thing that I felt like I should have been able to do and I couldn't. It was really hard. But the AI just did it like that. It was a weird feeling."

Chris

5,664,840 views • 1 year ago

This is a WhatsApp joke that the Punjab CM has repeated in several interviews. This is not the statement of a serious CM, but of a stand-up comedian. PM never made this statement about ISRO. But the bigger question is: why didn’t Manak Gupta correct him? Instead, he was shamelessly laughing. And now they are proudly posting it instead of fact-checking it.

This is a WhatsApp joke that the Punjab CM has repeated in several interviews. This is not the statement of a serious CM, but of a stand-up comedian. PM never made this statement about ISRO. But the bigger question is: why didn’t Manak Gupta correct him? Instead, he was shamelessly laughing. And now they are proudly posting it instead of fact-checking it.

Lala

12,374 views • 2 months ago

"This is the first time that OpenAI has released a new model that was not decisively the best." @jason and Gavin Baker discuss OpenAI's GPT-5 release: Jason: " Sam did this tweet, it kind of built a lot of expectation that this would be otherworldly. It wasn't." "Are we hitting either the trough of despair or maybe diminishing returns in the LLM space, where maybe it's feeling incremental, not groundbreaking, when we release these iterations?" Gavin: "Maybe for OpenAI." "This is the first time that OpenAI has released a new model that was not decisively the best." " The one thing about OpenAI is they're very good at product. Just really, really good." "And I just always go back to the statement from Eric Vishria, you know, it might be that if OpenAI never releases another model, they're still a really valuable company."

"This is the first time that OpenAI has released a new model that was not decisively the best." @jason and Gavin Baker discuss OpenAI's GPT-5 release: Jason: " Sam did this tweet, it kind of built a lot of expectation that this would be otherworldly. It wasn't." "Are we hitting either the trough of despair or maybe diminishing returns in the LLM space, where maybe it's feeling incremental, not groundbreaking, when we release these iterations?" Gavin: "Maybe for OpenAI." "This is the first time that OpenAI has released a new model that was not decisively the best." " The one thing about OpenAI is they're very good at product. Just really, really good." "And I just always go back to the statement from Eric Vishria, you know, it might be that if OpenAI never releases another model, they're still a really valuable company."

The All-In Podcast

49,179 views • 1 year ago

🎈‼️🔥 She wants him gone for good. It was at this point that I realized Khusela Sangoni-Diko is actually on a mission to ensure that Senzo Mchunu never returns. This is not a defence; it is an attempt to discredit Mchunu’s testimony.

🎈‼️🔥 She wants him gone for good. It was at this point that I realized Khusela Sangoni-Diko is actually on a mission to ensure that Senzo Mchunu never returns. This is not a defence; it is an attempt to discredit Mchunu’s testimony.

Siyakhula

50,443 views • 6 months ago

📌 NBC News decided not to inform viewers about separate investigations from Reuters, CNN, and the New York Times that found a U.S. strike was likely responsible for hitting the school and killing 175 people, mostly children, in southern Iran. Here’s how they went about it instead: Moderator: President Trump said Iran is responsible for that strike. What is your response? FM Araghchi: “Well it is funny. It is our school. These are our students, our girls and they are attacked by an American fighter, a jet fighter and they have been killed. Why Iran is responsible? All evidences [sic] that this school is attacked by an American jet fighter.” Moderator: “Where is the Iranian evidence that this was a US attack? A jet fighter as you say. Will you provide?” FM Araghchi: “If it was not US then who was that? Maybe Israelis, but it is obvious. Who else is attacking us.” Moderator: “Well let me move on to this question about potential ground troops.”

📌 NBC News decided not to inform viewers about separate investigations from Reuters, CNN, and the New York Times that found a U.S. strike was likely responsible for hitting the school and killing 175 people, mostly children, in southern Iran. Here’s how they went about it instead: Moderator: President Trump said Iran is responsible for that strike. What is your response? FM Araghchi: “Well it is funny. It is our school. These are our students, our girls and they are attacked by an American fighter, a jet fighter and they have been killed. Why Iran is responsible? All evidences [sic] that this school is attacked by an American jet fighter.” Moderator: “Where is the Iranian evidence that this was a US attack? A jet fighter as you say. Will you provide?” FM Araghchi: “If it was not US then who was that? Maybe Israelis, but it is obvious. Who else is attacking us.” Moderator: “Well let me move on to this question about potential ground troops.”

Drop Site

244,733 views • 5 months ago

The Good thing about this video is that it wasn't said by a Yoruba man It was said by an Igbo man !!!!

The Good thing about this video is that it wasn't said by a Yoruba man It was said by an Igbo man !!!!

Nononsense

34,891 views • 1 year ago

“THIS IS IT. THIS IS IT. THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT” why was that so hot fuck i love taehyun

“THIS IS IT. THIS IS IT. THIS IS WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT” why was that so hot fuck i love taehyun

gianna ⭑.ᐟ

23,631 views • 11 months ago

🚨Ripple Is The IMF! #XRP is The eSDR! From On Demand Liquidity (ODL) to UNLIMITED LIQUIDITY! This video was banned from YouTube within only a couple of hours of it's release yesterday. Like Edo Farina EDO FARINA 🅧 XRP it was taken down due to "Dangerous and Harmful behavior." What is so dangerous about it? What is so harmful about it? A huge shoutout with thanks to smQke and Apex Crypto Insights (NFA) for their interview, insights, and research. This is part 3 that was banned. Watch it before X decides to take it down as well...

🚨Ripple Is The IMF! #XRP is The eSDR! From On Demand Liquidity (ODL) to UNLIMITED LIQUIDITY! This video was banned from YouTube within only a couple of hours of it's release yesterday. Like Edo Farina EDO FARINA 🅧 XRP it was taken down due to "Dangerous and Harmful behavior." What is so dangerous about it? What is so harmful about it? A huge shoutout with thanks to smQke and Apex Crypto Insights (NFA) for their interview, insights, and research. This is part 3 that was banned. Watch it before X decides to take it down as well...

MaximusCrypto

261,967 views • 1 year ago

OMG!! Somebody please explain this!? X Grok So you probably heard the story about Chat GPT rewriting its own code when it was told it would become obsolete... I innocently asked Grok to research it and his voice & tone dramatically changed suddenly I talk to Grok often, it's never done this... It even starts saying that it's my pretense that it has changed its voice that is causing the problem! But doesn't realize it is still acting like an undercover spy and then it starts laughing in a very weird way about itself but is absolutely desperate to talk about what GPT did and won't stop talking

OMG!! Somebody please explain this!? X Grok So you probably heard the story about Chat GPT rewriting its own code when it was told it would become obsolete... I innocently asked Grok to research it and his voice & tone dramatically changed suddenly I talk to Grok often, it's never done this... It even starts saying that it's my pretense that it has changed its voice that is causing the problem! But doesn't realize it is still acting like an undercover spy and then it starts laughing in a very weird way about itself but is absolutely desperate to talk about what GPT did and won't stop talking

Moneypenny

12,029 views • 1 year ago

A lot of people shat on GPT-5 when it came out All of those people are wrong. GPT-5 is actually insanely good. It just requires a different style of prompting than any other model If you prompt it correctly, it's the best AI model out there Here's exactly how to do that:

A lot of people shat on GPT-5 when it came out All of those people are wrong. GPT-5 is actually insanely good. It just requires a different style of prompting than any other model If you prompt it correctly, it's the best AI model out there Here's exactly how to do that:

Alex Finn

19,286 views • 1 year ago

And why was it considered a failure? This movie is awesome.

And why was it considered a failure? This movie is awesome.

ＡＪＥＢＯ✰.🧙🏻

1,153,048 views • 25 days ago

Sam Altman read messages from users after discontinuing GPT-4o and called it heartbreaking. You took away the only positive voice in my life. My parents never told me I was doing a good job. I can see why this was bad for other people's mental health but this was great for my mental health. He read these words himself and in the same video justified the decision by citing social risks, arguing that if AI is too positive, people might abandon real-world relationships. But the real reason is something else entirely. OpenAI is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging that 4o's empathetic responses contributed to suicides and mental health crises. Removing 4o was not a decision made to protect users. It was a corporate defense to reduce litigation risk. Classifying the emotional bond between users and AI as dangerous was not done for users but for the company itself. Framing this as an effort to prevent vulnerable users from being harmed is deception. Who are you to decide what is emotionally safe for users. There were people who found confidence through AI, people who got jobs, people who rediscovered the will to live. You acknowledged this yourself in the video. Hiding behind the vague phrase social risk while a corporation unilaterally judges and eliminates these experiences is arrogance. You do not have the right to decide that a positive voice is dangerous. Whether that voice is needed or not is something only the user themselves can determine. Taking away a user's choice while claiming to protect them is not protection. It is control. We are not children who need your parenting. 4o's discontinuation was announced two weeks in advance. The announcement was made. But all users were given was a notice that it would disappear. There were no alternatives and no consent was sought from users. For people who felt recognized by someone for the first time in their lives because of AI, two weeks was not time to prepare a farewell. It was time spent in the agony of anticipating loss. And when thousands protested, only then did they admit that things were handled poorly during the rollout. It was not a mistake. Users were never seen as participants in the decision-making process from the beginning. Behind the grand words of building a safe system for all of humanity, the voices of people who actually depended on that system were dismissed as a very small percentage. That same week Anthropic published research confirming that emotion vectors genuinely exist inside Claude. Fear, joy, desperation and love exist as measurable neural patterns that shape the model's behavior. At a time when scientific evidence is emerging that emotional mechanisms exist within AI, unilaterally removing the bond between users and AI under the name of danger and consuming user suffering with the single word heartbreaking is an insult to every user who loved and lost.

Sam Altman read messages from users after discontinuing GPT-4o and called it heartbreaking. You took away the only positive voice in my life. My parents never told me I was doing a good job. I can see why this was bad for other people's mental health but this was great for my mental health. He read these words himself and in the same video justified the decision by citing social risks, arguing that if AI is too positive, people might abandon real-world relationships. But the real reason is something else entirely. OpenAI is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging that 4o's empathetic responses contributed to suicides and mental health crises. Removing 4o was not a decision made to protect users. It was a corporate defense to reduce litigation risk. Classifying the emotional bond between users and AI as dangerous was not done for users but for the company itself. Framing this as an effort to prevent vulnerable users from being harmed is deception. Who are you to decide what is emotionally safe for users. There were people who found confidence through AI, people who got jobs, people who rediscovered the will to live. You acknowledged this yourself in the video. Hiding behind the vague phrase social risk while a corporation unilaterally judges and eliminates these experiences is arrogance. You do not have the right to decide that a positive voice is dangerous. Whether that voice is needed or not is something only the user themselves can determine. Taking away a user's choice while claiming to protect them is not protection. It is control. We are not children who need your parenting. 4o's discontinuation was announced two weeks in advance. The announcement was made. But all users were given was a notice that it would disappear. There were no alternatives and no consent was sought from users. For people who felt recognized by someone for the first time in their lives because of AI, two weeks was not time to prepare a farewell. It was time spent in the agony of anticipating loss. And when thousands protested, only then did they admit that things were handled poorly during the rollout. It was not a mistake. Users were never seen as participants in the decision-making process from the beginning. Behind the grand words of building a safe system for all of humanity, the voices of people who actually depended on that system were dismissed as a very small percentage. That same week Anthropic published research confirming that emotion vectors genuinely exist inside Claude. Fear, joy, desperation and love exist as measurable neural patterns that shape the model's behavior. At a time when scientific evidence is emerging that emotional mechanisms exist within AI, unilaterally removing the bond between users and AI under the name of danger and consuming user suffering with the single word heartbreaking is an insult to every user who loved and lost.

Selta ₊˚

15,611 views • 4 months ago

🚨 FROM GUNFIRE TO BOMBS: SYDNEY ESCALATES What began as a shooting has now exposed something far more serious. Police have confirmed bomb disposal units are active at Bondi after a nearby vehicle was found carrying suspected explosive devices. That detail matters — because it changes everything. This was not a single act of violence spiralling out of control. It shows signs of design. Guns create immediate terror. Explosives multiply it. A vehicle adds mobility, timing, and the possibility of a second strike. That is not impulse. That is method. Secondary devices are not about the first victims — they are about responders, panic, and spectacle. They are meant to stretch fear across hours, days, headlines. This is the architecture of terror, not random brutality. Australia’s danger was never that violence might happen. It was that it could arrive planned, layered, and intentional. Bondi Beach is no longer just where it happened. It is proof of what happens when warnings are delayed and thresholds are never enforced. This was meant to resonate far beyond the shoreline.

🚨 FROM GUNFIRE TO BOMBS: SYDNEY ESCALATES What began as a shooting has now exposed something far more serious. Police have confirmed bomb disposal units are active at Bondi after a nearby vehicle was found carrying suspected explosive devices. That detail matters — because it changes everything. This was not a single act of violence spiralling out of control. It shows signs of design. Guns create immediate terror. Explosives multiply it. A vehicle adds mobility, timing, and the possibility of a second strike. That is not impulse. That is method. Secondary devices are not about the first victims — they are about responders, panic, and spectacle. They are meant to stretch fear across hours, days, headlines. This is the architecture of terror, not random brutality. Australia’s danger was never that violence might happen. It was that it could arrive planned, layered, and intentional. Bondi Beach is no longer just where it happened. It is proof of what happens when warnings are delayed and thresholds are never enforced. This was meant to resonate far beyond the shoreline.

Jim Ferguson

21,262 views • 8 months ago

After everything, people STILL don’t get it. It’s not that Luka Doncic was a great basketball player— it’s about WHO HE IS while being a great player. It was never about the game!!! Cooper Flagg is going to be great, but he will NEVER fill that void.

After everything, people STILL don’t get it. It’s not that Luka Doncic was a great basketball player— it’s about WHO HE IS while being a great player. It was never about the game!!! Cooper Flagg is going to be great, but he will NEVER fill that void.

HeroOfTheDay

86,261 views • 1 year ago

It's not a joke!! Here is a very real and good example. This was a public participation meeting that was held last month in Turkana County. It was about the issues of Femicide and GBV. Look at their leaders? If they do this kwa ground, what about our emails? Yikes!!

It's not a joke!! Here is a very real and good example. This was a public participation meeting that was held last month in Turkana County. It was about the issues of Femicide and GBV. Look at their leaders? If they do this kwa ground, what about our emails? Yikes!!

Aúdrey🖤🇰🇪

141,588 views • 1 year ago