Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This portable microscope was designed by Opus 5 I gave it a few simple requirements, and it generated the whole design in code Lots of details and interactions It looks sci-fi, but it can be easily 3D printed Some of the code can even run on a Raspberry Pi... show more

Dilum Sanjaya

57,401 subscribers

29,569 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Haven't seen any demos of using vibe coding to prototype gadgets like this So I made one. Everything here is generated with code Parts of the code and logic can even be reused on a Raspberry Pi to build the real thing Some tips ↓

Haven't seen any demos of using vibe coding to prototype gadgets like this So I made one. Everything here is generated with code Parts of the code and logic can even be reused on a Raspberry Pi to build the real thing Some tips ↓

Dilum Sanjaya

116,619 views • 2 months ago

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

i gave the exact same prompt to Opus 5 and Fable 5 and here's what came out Opus 5 dropped yesterday and my feed was instantly full of comparison posts but i wanted to check it myself so i gave it one task build 3d Flappy Bird first thing everyone was saying Opus is 2x cheaper than Fable BUT.. building the game on Max effort cost me 250k tokens and 1 hour on Opus and 130k on Fable but Fable did it in half the time Opus gave me volume control plus 3 separate graphics presets to choose from, Fable gave none of that in Opus the environment shifts dynamically as you play in Fable it's basically the same frame the whole run maybe a day/night change here and there graphics, animations, glow, all of it goes to Opus and now that limits jumped 50% for the near future while Fable went paid for me the call is obvious right now Opus same prompt start to finish zero changes to code or commands want it? i can send it over

savip.

45,764 views • 1 month ago

A visual design experiment built on Replit ⠕. UIs in sci-fi movies were the inspiration. A galactic radar listening for signals across the stars with simulated data. Designed to test how far design and code can merge into something beautiful. See it for yourself:

A visual design experiment built on Replit ⠕. UIs in sci-fi movies were the inspiration. A galactic radar listening for signals across the stars with simulated data. Designed to test how far design and code can merge into something beautiful. See it for yourself:

Levin Stanley

294,007 views • 10 months ago

Here is a game that looks like it was made with 2D sprites on a tilemap But it’s actually a three.js scene Also, no external assets. It’s all code and a bit of shader magic The player can switch between the pixel view and the 3D scene Made with Opus 5

Here is a game that looks like it was made with 2D sprites on a tilemap But it’s actually a three.js scene Also, no external assets. It’s all code and a bit of shader magic The player can switch between the pixel view and the 3D scene Made with Opus 5

Dilum Sanjaya

48,172 views • 11 days ago

I love the design of the Void I'm so glad I can actually run around and see a part of it and even engage with some Voidsent

Sensitive content

I love the design of the Void I'm so glad I can actually run around and see a part of it and even engage with some Voidsent

Brendzun

1,006,039 views • 1 month ago

You can now run MicroPython on an emulated Raspberry Pi Pico - inside a real circuit simulator, on your iPhone, iPad, and Mac. Write the code, wire the GPIOs into analog + digital circuits, and watch it all run. Live. iCircuit 1.16 beta is ready. Testers wanted 👇

You can now run MicroPython on an emulated Raspberry Pi Pico - inside a real circuit simulator, on your iPhone, iPad, and Mac. Write the code, wire the GPIOs into analog + digital circuits, and watch it all run. Live. iCircuit 1.16 beta is ready. Testers wanted 👇

Frank A. Krueger

11,049 views • 1 month ago

✨ For the last few months I have been reverse engineering Magnific AI's famous upscaler It uses MultiDiffusion, ControlNet tiles and details LoRas In true AI spirit, I am open sourcing it for everyone to use for free in your apps It's designed to easily control the amount of hallucination, resemblance and creativity. You can use it on Replicate now: Or run it locally with A1111'a web UI (parameters are in the comments) The code is fully open source:

✨ For the last few months I have been reverse engineering Magnific AI's famous upscaler It uses MultiDiffusion, ControlNet tiles and details LoRas In true AI spirit, I am open sourcing it for everyone to use for free in your apps It's designed to easily control the amount of hallucination, resemblance and creativity. You can use it on Replicate now: Or run it locally with A1111'a web UI (parameters are in the comments) The code is fully open source:

philz1337x

565,637 views • 2 years ago

I love the chicken game! Only available on roobet. Use code stevewilldoit and 100% of money generated goes to the players under code . I keep zero. We are still figuring out the details on how that works but haven’t checked the code in weeks it’s all for the players . This was my idea and roobet liked it so we are doing it . :)

I love the chicken game! Only available on roobet. Use code stevewilldoit and 100% of money generated goes to the players under code . I keep zero. We are still figuring out the details on how that works but haven’t checked the code in weeks it’s all for the players . This was my idea and roobet liked it so we are doing it . :)

Steve Will Do It

131,565 views • 2 years ago

I gave ChatGPT a screenshot of a SaaS dashboard and it wrote the code for it. This is the future.

I gave ChatGPT a screenshot of a SaaS dashboard and it wrote the code for it. This is the future.

Mckay Wrigley

8,207,115 views • 2 years ago

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Reviewing AI-generated code is the new bottleneck. Writing code was slow before. Now, in a few minutes, you can generate virtually unlimited lines of code using AI. But developers are now spending 70% of their time checking that code. That's the new bottleneck. I've been using Cline, and they have a feature that actually helps with this: You can click a button and have Cline generate an inline explanation for every single line of AI-generated code. Take a look at the attached video. What it does: 1. You can read the code and the explanation together 2. You don't lose context while reviewing code 3. You understand the "why" behind each change And here is the best part: It works on any git diff. You can use it to review PRs, understand commits from other people, or catch up on a codebase you haven't touched in a while.

Santiago

64,438 views • 8 months ago

🚨BREAKING: You can now build full websites by just typing. It’s called Youware, and it runs on pure vibe coding. Here’s how it works (with a live demo):👇 1. Create a web page or game just by typing. You can even send a screenshot to make it live. 2. Use built-in tools like Figma, YouTube, and Notion. 3. Change a Figma design into a real website. 4. Change how the webpage looks with one click using the boost button on the profile page. 5. Easily deploy code with a link you can share. 6. Highlights: free online AI coding. Try it today:

Hasan Toor

73,516 views • 1 year ago

$I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)$

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

195,173 views • 1 year ago

So.. Claude Opus 5 can build a game character, equip, rig and animate it in Three.js with pure code Prompt and demo link below 👇

So.. Claude Opus 5 can build a game character, equip, rig and animate it in Three.js with pure code Prompt and demo link below 👇

Majid Manzarpour

67,782 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: Clone any successful company Claude Code Opus 4.6 in Shipper can take any app and make it yours: design, code, business plan... you can now ship the next duolingo / twitter / airbnb / etc this is THE END of vibe coding.

🚨 BREAKING: Clone any successful company Claude Code Opus 4.6 in Shipper can take any app and make it yours: design, code, business plan... you can now ship the next duolingo / twitter / airbnb / etc this is THE END of vibe coding.

Shipper

243,186 views • 4 months ago

Gave Gemini 3 Deep Think an image of a 3D spider web and asked for an interactive design tool. It generated a full design suite (procedural control, simulation, optimization) with STL export capability. I used it to engineer new metamaterials and a spider-web inspired bridge design, 3D printed it, then validated the structural integrity with a NVIDIA DGX Spark load test. A mind-blowing example of the future of material and architecture design - image in, fabrication-ready design out! Google Gemini

Gave Gemini 3 Deep Think an image of a 3D spider web and asked for an interactive design tool. It generated a full design suite (procedural control, simulation, optimization) with STL export capability. I used it to engineer new metamaterials and a spider-web inspired bridge design, 3D printed it, then validated the structural integrity with a NVIDIA DGX Spark load test. A mind-blowing example of the future of material and architecture design - image in, fabrication-ready design out! Google Gemini

Markus J. Buehler

98,719 views • 6 months ago

The Raspberry Pi 5 works with AMD 7000-series cards. Yes, it can run Doom (Eternal). And Crysis (Remastered). In 4K. And do hardware video transcoding. Check it out:

The Raspberry Pi 5 works with AMD 7000-series cards. Yes, it can run Doom (Eternal). And Crysis (Remastered). In 4K. And do hardware video transcoding. Check it out:

Jeff Geerling

139,246 views • 1 year ago

Raspberry Pi gets a comeback as the Star Trek communicator with OpenClaw! Raspberry Pi was popular in the 2010s and now faces a comeback as the personification of OpenClaw in a Tamagotchi shape - it listens, it thinks and it even talks! And it is not even that expensive! Sebastian Volkl created his Raspberry Pi project with just $100. Do you want your own OpenClaw Tamagotchi? #tamagotchi #openclaw #raspberrypi #ai #tech Sebastian Völkl

Raspberry Pi gets a comeback as the Star Trek communicator with OpenClaw! Raspberry Pi was popular in the 2010s and now faces a comeback as the personification of OpenClaw in a Tamagotchi shape - it listens, it thinks and it even talks! And it is not even that expensive! Sebastian Volkl created his Raspberry Pi project with just $100. Do you want your own OpenClaw Tamagotchi? #tamagotchi #openclaw #raspberrypi #ai #tech Sebastian Völkl

This Week in Startups

16,116 views • 6 months ago

I applied Matt's prompt, ran it for a little over ten hours. About 1.3 million tokens on Opus 5. It created the game. I also made a video of it using Opus 5. Here's the video (and in my reply to this is a link to the actual game so you can play).

I applied Matt's prompt, ran it for a little over ten hours. About 1.3 million tokens on Opus 5. It created the game. I also made a video of it using Opus 5. Here's the video (and in my reply to this is a link to the actual game so you can play).

James Altucher

128,128 views • 1 month ago

Fable 5 is insane! We gave it a single reference link: HaoqiWen’s Open Design’s built-in skills helped it inspect the site, understand the visual and technical details, and Fable 5 recreate a polished landing page with rich motion and 3D interactions.

Fable 5 is insane! We gave it a single reference link: HaoqiWen’s Open Design’s built-in skills helped it inspect the site, understand the visual and technical details, and Fable 5 recreate a polished landing page with rich motion and 3D interactions.

Open Design

273,702 views • 2 months ago

When I first saw this game in the arcade, I thought it was similar to OutRun. But instead of running on a fixed circuit, you follow a straight course, which makes racing really fun. It was only released on the Nintendo 64 in North America, so only NA gamers knew about it. It never came out in Asia, and the region code was different, so there was no way to play it back then. Nowadays, you can run it using EverDrive or code-free mods.

When I first saw this game in the arcade, I thought it was similar to OutRun. But instead of running on a fixed circuit, you follow a straight course, which makes racing really fun. It was only released on the Nintendo 64 in North America, so only NA gamers knew about it. It never came out in Asia, and the region code was different, so there was no way to play it back then. Nowadays, you can run it using EverDrive or code-free mods.

Gamer_lafan

104,634 views • 6 months ago