正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This tyrant shows why bodycams are so vital. When a routine traffic stop turns into a complete breakdown of constitutional rights, the sworn deposition under oath reveals everything. The arrogance of this deputy will blow your mind. Citizen journalist Jeff Gray observed and video-recorded a routine traffic stop conducted... by Deputy Cook from roughly 35 feet away. Rather than completing the stop, the deputy claimed recording made him "nervous" and called for backup. Upon arriving, Deputy Brian Stoll attempted to control the scene by instructing Gray to stand near a commercial building—only to then approach the property manager to solicit a trespass order against him. When ordered off the private property, Gray immediately complied and walked onto the public right-of-way. Despite Gray standing fully on public property, Deputy Stoll arrested him, damaged his phone, and threatened to hold him as a "John Doe" in jail for 48 hours for not surrendering identification. Fast forward to the civil suit deposition, Deputy Stoll's testimony unraveled on the record: • He claimed under oath that officers possess virtually unlimited authority to issue demands, and refusing to comply automatically constitutes criminal obstruction. This is what this bully believes. • He admitted Gray did nothing disruptive beyond holding a camera from 35 feet away, yet maintained that making an officer nervous by filming equals obstruction. • He conceded on the record that Gray had already retreated to the public right-of-way before being handcuffed. Translation his ego was hurt so he wanted to punish Gray for it by arresting him and hoping he will resist. The criminal charges against Gray were promptly dismissed, the deputy faced internal reprimands, and Brevard County ultimately settled the federal § 1983 civil rights lawsuit out of court after the damaging deposition stripped away any viable defense. The real crime here is that this person that is not fit to wear a badge got to keep his job and the tax payers had to bail him out with an undisclosed size cash settlement.show more

Giggling Gannon

279,553 subscribers

54,858 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

35 条评论

Teslacus Maximus 💪 的头像

Teslacus Maximus 💪1 个月前

Isn’t there a minimum IQ to be a police officer? Clearly this cop has a subnormal IQ and all the training in the world wouldn’t fix this.

Popsmoke7007 的头像

Popsmoke70071 个月前

Something else to remember .. but you better be armed and ready with others willing to support it by your side.

Popsmoke7007 的头像

Popsmoke70071 个月前

This is why you do not settle unless the corrupt corporate policy enforcement officer has to give pension money as part of the settlement. These fucks must have skin in the game.

Cameron Hall 的头像

Cameron Hall1 个月前

Yeah, cost the taxpayers some more money, what an absolute joke of a system they have going on. If this crap keeps happening we will keep going down as a society. They most definitely should be held accountable and pay out of pocket like every ordinary citizen would be forced to do.

Michael Mize 的头像

Michael Mize1 个月前

Absolutely no such thing as a good cop

Boomer White 的头像

Boomer White1 个月前

The state trains these thugs to violate your constitutional rights. The 2nd amendment was written for this exact tyranny

Stan Marsh 的头像

Stan Marsh1 个月前

@BrevardCountySD disgraceful. Are all your cops this ignorant and tyrannical? This was an unconstitutional & retaliatory arrest. This tyrant should have been fired, charged, & prosecuted. You are supposed to enforce the law. U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

Joel Anderson 的头像

Joel Anderson1 个月前

Is there anything in this whole scenario that the cops did right?

Water⚡Maker 的头像

Water⚡Maker1 个月前

So the cop ordered him to stand by the building, then solicited the trespass from the manager, so he left the property before he was arrested for trespassing? Can the cop not hear his own testimony?

LL Kool Dre 的头像

LL Kool Dre1 个月前

Jeff "Educated Bum" Grey a resident of Florida is a National Treasure and needs to be protected at all costs.

Randy Strickler 的头像

Randy Strickler1 个月前

Punk ass bitch who thinks his badge gives him authority to trample civilians rights. Bad cops breaking the law again

Max Splatter 的头像

Max Splatter1 个月前

How much money did the guy get for this Pig Violating at least 3 of this guy’s civil rights… Fat settlement I’m sure….

Tommy welch 的头像

Tommy welch1 个月前

You can tell he just knows how stupid the whole arrest was. This cop is absolutely fkd and he knows it. 🤣 This is got to be the best Walk of shame I'll ever seen! 😂

Ichabod Crane 的头像

Ichabod Crane1 个月前

These cops are a perfect example of tyrant pieces of shit. I hope they get fired.

Lady Greeno 的头像

Lady Greeno1 个月前

Jeff Grey makes loadsa money for the homeless vets by suing crooked cops like the one in the video This is how he started his magic cardboard mirror life

Jeff O 的头像

Jeff O1 个月前

End Qualified Immunity! Make the bad cops pay settlements not the taxpayer and throw them in jail this cop is garbage!

aLien Gou 的头像

aLien Gou1 个月前

Cop saying resistance will be futile like the fucking Borg…

Mike 的头像

Mike1 个月前

soliciting a trespass situation by the cop after telling the guy to go over by the shade seems criminal, alone. The trespass was most like for the guy, not the van as the cop admitted the van was not the issue. On top of that, the threat to leave him locked up for 2 to 3 days because he didn't give his name when the original detention was illegal, seems like a threat under color of law. There are so many things wrong with this situation. Where is the full deposition and what was the purpose of this deposition, civil or criminal. What is the latest on this case.

Marc Demyen 的头像

Marc Demyen1 个月前

You should also notice it took four years to hear this in court… This is a tactic used by tyrant, pig and pig adjacent parasites

UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICAN WHITE MALE 的头像

UNAPOLOGETICALLY AMERICAN WHITE MALE1 个月前

There are ZERO consequences when these unqualified idiots are wrong or undereducated or violent or just plain stupid. The worst they have to worry about is **pAiD AdMiNiStRaTiVe LeAvE** aka VACATION! The reality is Gray's OWN tax dollars paid his OWN settlement. Unconstitutional

Jm 的头像

Jm1 个月前

This is why they are all hated so much. Once you put that badge on you become the enemy of the people.

erl masse 的头像

erl masse1 个月前

Fagot coward corrupt pig fagot pussies that should be destroyed

Len Bera 的头像

Len Bera1 个月前

If these body cams are purchased by people's tax money, why can't the people go to the website of the police station and watch every one of those videos? We pay for them through our taxes. Why can't we see them, what are they afraid of us seeing?

REP 的头像

REP1 个月前

@MagaGrunt1 Brevard may have settled, but a 1983 lawsuit also provides for personal liability for the officer. I would wreck the egomaniac!

Eric Swann 的头像

Eric Swann1 个月前

Resistance will be futile what a fucking pussy and coward. Why do they hate the citizens they swore an oath to protect

Chris olson 的头像

Chris olson1 个月前

Soliciting a trespass is such a pathetic and corrupt thing to do. He set him up for this arrest because he got butt hurt. Fucking loser.

dewey weber 的头像

dewey weber1 个月前

This is the exact type of person who needs to be removed from society. How truly pathetic can one person be? Just sickening.

Red 的头像

Red1 个月前

This is how retarded cops are

NotaKylerFan 的头像

NotaKylerFan1 个月前

Look how openly retarded cops are in America

Larry 的头像

Larry1 个月前

They’re the same as retarded children when they lie- beet red, stammering, looking up and away. Great poker face cocksucker

Timothy Adams 的头像

Timothy Adams1 个月前

Under arrest for existing.. 🥴

Brian Gleaton 的头像

Brian Gleaton1 个月前

I'm so glad they have body cams now I think we should vote that they get a camera on their head also so we can always see where they are looking because a body cam only faces forward it's easy to sneak past that. I used to really be scared of cops before they have body cams.

⭐LoneStar⭐ 的头像

⭐LoneStar⭐1 个月前

Crooked cops...smh

Richard 的头像

Richard1 个月前

You just admitted it that just because you didn't listen to him. You could be subject to arrest, which he did. He arrested a man because he didn't listen to the public servant. Exactly what he said. So that means he committed a crime, and he must be arrested and punished

Old Man Hoff 的头像

Old Man Hoff1 个月前

Nothing happens unless the perpetrator loses their qualified immunity and are subject to a lawsuit themselves. If the city always pays, they won’t be held accountable or change their ways. Pensions would a good source of restitution.

相关视频

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.

Giggling Ganon

53,241 次观看 • 3 个月前

Deputy enters property through a locked gate and no warrant. Gets schooled on tresspass laws and booted off the property. When law enforcement mistakes an In Kalispell, Montana, a Flathead County Sheriff’s deputy identifying himself only as "Deputy Mark", bypassed a chained, closed gate onto private property under the premise of investigating an abandoned Ford Expedition parked down near a local school. The deputy claimed he was conducting a welfare check to locate an individual named Eli Tully. The immediate issue? Had the deputy conducted basic due diligence before stepping foot past a locked perimeter, he would have known Tully had already been arrested two weeks prior and was actively sitting inside the Flathead County Detention Center on assault charges. When property owner Jacob Norris stepped out to address the intrusion, he immediately answered the deputy's primary question by confirming Tully was already in the county jail. He also questioned the deputy on how he got in thus getting the deputy to admit that the gate was locked with a chain. Norris then did what every citizen has the constitutional right to do: he exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and repeatedly ordered the deputy to vacate his private property. Under the Fourth Amendment and Montana trespass law, any implied license for an officer to conduct a warrantless knock-and-talk vanishes the moment the property owner revokes consent. Instead of walking back to his cruiser, the deputy’s ego took over. Viewing the invocation of basic rights as defiance rather than the law of the land, he refused to leave, walked over to question a neighbor on the property, and brazenly stated: "I'll leave when I'm done." That statement encapsulates an alarming mentality where an officer believes personal convenience and authority supersede the private property rights of the public. To make matters worse, after escalating the encounter and demonstrating clear contempt for a citizen standing on firm legal ground, the deputy refused to provide his full name or badge number before driving off. There are no records I can find if Jacob filed a formal complaint or lawsuit against the sheriff department based on the incident. Know your rights, remain calm, and never let an official convince you that following the Constitution is optional.

Deputy enters property through a locked gate and no warrant. Gets schooled on tresspass laws and booted off the property. When law enforcement mistakes an In Kalispell, Montana, a Flathead County Sheriff’s deputy identifying himself only as "Deputy Mark", bypassed a chained, closed gate onto private property under the premise of investigating an abandoned Ford Expedition parked down near a local school. The deputy claimed he was conducting a welfare check to locate an individual named Eli Tully. The immediate issue? Had the deputy conducted basic due diligence before stepping foot past a locked perimeter, he would have known Tully had already been arrested two weeks prior and was actively sitting inside the Flathead County Detention Center on assault charges. When property owner Jacob Norris stepped out to address the intrusion, he immediately answered the deputy's primary question by confirming Tully was already in the county jail. He also questioned the deputy on how he got in thus getting the deputy to admit that the gate was locked with a chain. Norris then did what every citizen has the constitutional right to do: he exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and repeatedly ordered the deputy to vacate his private property. Under the Fourth Amendment and Montana trespass law, any implied license for an officer to conduct a warrantless knock-and-talk vanishes the moment the property owner revokes consent. Instead of walking back to his cruiser, the deputy’s ego took over. Viewing the invocation of basic rights as defiance rather than the law of the land, he refused to leave, walked over to question a neighbor on the property, and brazenly stated: "I'll leave when I'm done." That statement encapsulates an alarming mentality where an officer believes personal convenience and authority supersede the private property rights of the public. To make matters worse, after escalating the encounter and demonstrating clear contempt for a citizen standing on firm legal ground, the deputy refused to provide his full name or badge number before driving off. There are no records I can find if Jacob filed a formal complaint or lawsuit against the sheriff department based on the incident. Know your rights, remain calm, and never let an official convince you that following the Constitution is optional.

Giggling Gannon

1,389,206 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Ricardez spotted a man filming behind a store while on patrol, approached him on the property, demanded ID and an explanation for why he was there recording, and went hands-on. An employee then opened the back door, told the deputy the man was allowed to be there, and brought him inside. Deputy Ricardez said he was just trying to protect the business. ❓Who is to blame for how this went down? The man who didn't cooperate with the deputy or the deputy for going onto private property and demanding answers. ❓Is the deputy being proactive by checking on him or is he just looking for someone to eff with? ❓Can a police officer go onto private property uninvited, and detain someone for loitering, because he saw them recording?

🚨Riverside County Sheriff’s Deputy Anthony Ricardez spotted a man filming behind a store while on patrol, approached him on the property, demanded ID and an explanation for why he was there recording, and went hands-on. An employee then opened the back door, told the deputy the man was allowed to be there, and brought him inside. Deputy Ricardez said he was just trying to protect the business. ❓Who is to blame for how this went down? The man who didn't cooperate with the deputy or the deputy for going onto private property and demanding answers. ❓Is the deputy being proactive by checking on him or is he just looking for someone to eff with? ❓Can a police officer go onto private property uninvited, and detain someone for loitering, because he saw them recording?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

54,017 次观看 • 5 天前

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Giggling Ganon

30,366 次观看 • 5 个月前

Bully cop that wants to flex his authority, gets trolled throughout the stop and completely owned once the stop was over. Deputy Brian Morris (Badge #814) pulls over a driver named Travis near White Creek Baptist Church. Almost immediately after establishing the reason for the stop, Deputy Morris orders Travis to step out of his vehicle. When Travis asks why he needs to get out of the car for a simple equipment violation, Deputy Morris cites the landmark 1977 Supreme Court case Pennsylvania v. Mimms, which established that law enforcement officers have the authority to order drivers out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety. However when asked if this was for safety he replied not necessarily. Once outside, Travis is completely transparent and informs the deputy that he is legally carrying two firearms—one on his hip and another in an ankle holster—as well as a pocket knife. Deputy Morris insists on disarming Travis for the duration of the stop. Travis begins recording on his phone and pushes back, arguing that temporarily seizing his weapons when he is being fully cooperative and poses no threat is a clear violation of his Second and Fourth Amendment rights. He points out that under Terry v. Ohio, an individual must be considered both armed and dangerous to justify a search or seizure, arguing that legal firearm ownership alone shouldn't automatically make someone a target for disarming. Despite the back-and-forth legal argument, the interaction remains verbal. Deputy Morris temporarily secures the firearms, checks Travis’s license and information, and finds no issues. Travis does remind the deputy throughout the stop that he understands that the deputy is scared and that this might not be the right job for this deputy. In the end, Deputy Morris unloads the handguns, returns them along with the knife, and sends Travis on his way with a verbal warning for the brake light. Before driving off, Travis unloads on the deputy with a few strong thoughts on police overreach and constitutional rights. Does an officer's blanket policy on safety outweigh a compliant citizen's right to carry without interference during a minor traffic stop? I know where I stand on this, but would love to hear the thoughts of others.

Bully cop that wants to flex his authority, gets trolled throughout the stop and completely owned once the stop was over. Deputy Brian Morris (Badge #814) pulls over a driver named Travis near White Creek Baptist Church. Almost immediately after establishing the reason for the stop, Deputy Morris orders Travis to step out of his vehicle. When Travis asks why he needs to get out of the car for a simple equipment violation, Deputy Morris cites the landmark 1977 Supreme Court case Pennsylvania v. Mimms, which established that law enforcement officers have the authority to order drivers out of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop for officer safety. However when asked if this was for safety he replied not necessarily. Once outside, Travis is completely transparent and informs the deputy that he is legally carrying two firearms—one on his hip and another in an ankle holster—as well as a pocket knife. Deputy Morris insists on disarming Travis for the duration of the stop. Travis begins recording on his phone and pushes back, arguing that temporarily seizing his weapons when he is being fully cooperative and poses no threat is a clear violation of his Second and Fourth Amendment rights. He points out that under Terry v. Ohio, an individual must be considered both armed and dangerous to justify a search or seizure, arguing that legal firearm ownership alone shouldn't automatically make someone a target for disarming. Despite the back-and-forth legal argument, the interaction remains verbal. Deputy Morris temporarily secures the firearms, checks Travis’s license and information, and finds no issues. Travis does remind the deputy throughout the stop that he understands that the deputy is scared and that this might not be the right job for this deputy. In the end, Deputy Morris unloads the handguns, returns them along with the knife, and sends Travis on his way with a verbal warning for the brake light. Before driving off, Travis unloads on the deputy with a few strong thoughts on police overreach and constitutional rights. Does an officer's blanket policy on safety outweigh a compliant citizen's right to carry without interference during a minor traffic stop? I know where I stand on this, but would love to hear the thoughts of others.

Giggling Gannon

93,050 次观看 • 2 个月前

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Giggling Ganon

81,704 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚔Watch a deputy refuse to leave a property after he no longer has a legal reason to be there. Making a point. Three Florida sheriff's deputies showed up at a residence looking for someone who used to live there. One deputy walked the curtilage of the property while the homeowner spoke with the other two. The homeowner told them the person they wanted was already in their custody at the Osceola County Jail. The deputy still continued moving about the property then defiantly stood facing the homeowner without moving as he repeatedly asked, then demanded that the deputy remove himself from the property. The homeowner demanded a sergeant respond so he could file a complaint. Instead, a deputy handed him a card with a number and told him to call and ask for a supervisor. That’s how it was handled. ❓When does “looking for someone who used to live here” become a search of your front and back yards? ❓What training says keep walking the property after the reason for being there is gone? ❓Why did one deputy stand flatfooted and defiant while the owner kept telling him to get off his property?

🚔Watch a deputy refuse to leave a property after he no longer has a legal reason to be there. Making a point. Three Florida sheriff's deputies showed up at a residence looking for someone who used to live there. One deputy walked the curtilage of the property while the homeowner spoke with the other two. The homeowner told them the person they wanted was already in their custody at the Osceola County Jail. The deputy still continued moving about the property then defiantly stood facing the homeowner without moving as he repeatedly asked, then demanded that the deputy remove himself from the property. The homeowner demanded a sergeant respond so he could file a complaint. Instead, a deputy handed him a card with a number and told him to call and ask for a supervisor. That’s how it was handled. ❓When does “looking for someone who used to live here” become a search of your front and back yards? ❓What training says keep walking the property after the reason for being there is gone? ❓Why did one deputy stand flatfooted and defiant while the owner kept telling him to get off his property?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

46,584 次观看 • 7 天前

🎥Detained in Dothan for recording ambulances running a stop sign. Jeff Gray was on a public sidewalk in Dothan, AL filming ambulances running a stop sign near Southeast Health. Hospital employees called police when they saw him. Officer Kevin Fischer (#1146) showed up, and with no questions asked detained him as a “suspicious person". He gave him a stern taking down to, called him a "First Amendment predator" and demanded ID because he was “creating a disturbance.” Gray was filming public activity from a public sidewalk. No crime. No arrest. Just a report and an ID check under protest. Photography is not a crime. ❓Did Officer Fisher actually have reasonable suspicion—or just an attitude? ❓Why did Officer Fisher say Gray was “creating a disturbance” inside the building when he was only standing outside on the sidewalk? ❓Did it seem to you like Officer Fisher had his mind made up about Jeff Gray before he even exited his vehicle?

🎥Detained in Dothan for recording ambulances running a stop sign. Jeff Gray was on a public sidewalk in Dothan, AL filming ambulances running a stop sign near Southeast Health. Hospital employees called police when they saw him. Officer Kevin Fischer (#1146) showed up, and with no questions asked detained him as a “suspicious person". He gave him a stern taking down to, called him a "First Amendment predator" and demanded ID because he was “creating a disturbance.” Gray was filming public activity from a public sidewalk. No crime. No arrest. Just a report and an ID check under protest. Photography is not a crime. ❓Did Officer Fisher actually have reasonable suspicion—or just an attitude? ❓Why did Officer Fisher say Gray was “creating a disturbance” inside the building when he was only standing outside on the sidewalk? ❓Did it seem to you like Officer Fisher had his mind made up about Jeff Gray before he even exited his vehicle?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

36,564 次观看 • 21 天前

Drunk male karen tried to square up on officer twice his size over an Uber dispute. It comically does not end well for him. Deputies in Charlotte County, Florida, received an urgent call from an Uber driver. She reported that her passenger, 52-year-old Eric Martel, had become incredibly aggressive and confrontational after she picked him up from a local bar. Fearing for her safety, the driver didn't hesitate—she immediately dropped Martel off in a nearby business parking lot and called 911. When deputies arrived minutes later, Martel initially allowed a pat-down for weapons, but the cooperation stopped there. Over the course of the interaction, his demeanor completely shifted into outright hostility. When property management requested that Martel be formally trespassed from the property, he flatly refused to leave. He repeatedly shouted obscenities, squared up with a sergeant, and accused the deputies of disrespecting him. The situation crossed the line when Martel looked directly at a deputy that was twice his size and told him he will need three of him to stop him. The deputy answered I doubt that. After multiple warnings to walk away and stop causing a public disturbance, deputies attempted to place Martel under arrest. Martel physically resisted, leading a deputy to deploy a Taser to safely bring him to the ground and secure him in handcuffs. If Martel had simply walked away when told to leave, he would have remained a free man. Instead, he was booked into the Charlotte County Jail on a heavy list of charges: Disorderly Intoxication Trespass After Warning Resisting an Officer Without Violence Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) You just knew as this built up that this guy was playing stupid games and it would only be a matter of time before he won his prize.

Drunk male karen tried to square up on officer twice his size over an Uber dispute. It comically does not end well for him. Deputies in Charlotte County, Florida, received an urgent call from an Uber driver. She reported that her passenger, 52-year-old Eric Martel, had become incredibly aggressive and confrontational after she picked him up from a local bar. Fearing for her safety, the driver didn't hesitate—she immediately dropped Martel off in a nearby business parking lot and called 911. When deputies arrived minutes later, Martel initially allowed a pat-down for weapons, but the cooperation stopped there. Over the course of the interaction, his demeanor completely shifted into outright hostility. When property management requested that Martel be formally trespassed from the property, he flatly refused to leave. He repeatedly shouted obscenities, squared up with a sergeant, and accused the deputies of disrespecting him. The situation crossed the line when Martel looked directly at a deputy that was twice his size and told him he will need three of him to stop him. The deputy answered I doubt that. After multiple warnings to walk away and stop causing a public disturbance, deputies attempted to place Martel under arrest. Martel physically resisted, leading a deputy to deploy a Taser to safely bring him to the ground and secure him in handcuffs. If Martel had simply walked away when told to leave, he would have remained a free man. Instead, he was booked into the Charlotte County Jail on a heavy list of charges: Disorderly Intoxication Trespass After Warning Resisting an Officer Without Violence Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (Felony) You just knew as this built up that this guy was playing stupid games and it would only be a matter of time before he won his prize.

Giggling Ganon

196,817 次观看 • 3 个月前

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Gannon

110,729 次观看 • 2 个月前

Two tyrants get schooled on citizen rights. Mind blowing what the do not know. Outside a Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office facility in North Carolina, an independent journalist began filming from a publicly accessible county parking lot. Two deputies, one of which named including Sergeant McNigley quickly approached him. The officers demanded to see his ID, claiming he was acting suspiciously by filming patrol vehicles and insisting the area was "private county property." Class is in session from that point on. The journalist stood his ground on Identification: He calmly educates the officers on the law, reminding them that North Carolina is not a "stop and identify" state. Without reasonable, articulable suspicion of a crime, law enforcement cannot compel a citizen to present identification. Refuting the "Private Property" Myth: When the deputies claim the parking lot is private county property, the journalist correctly counters that public facilities funded by taxpayers are subject to public access and First Amendment protection when visible from public space. De-escalating the Pressure: Despite repeated attempts at intimidation and circular arguments about authority, the journalist remains composed, eventually forcing the officers to admit he is not being detained. In the end, the officers are forced to let him walk away—proving once again why understanding your constitutional rights is your greatest defense. The journalist did an incredible job refusing to bow to unlawful demands and standing tall for civil liberties. This is how it's done.

Two tyrants get schooled on citizen rights. Mind blowing what the do not know. Outside a Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office facility in North Carolina, an independent journalist began filming from a publicly accessible county parking lot. Two deputies, one of which named including Sergeant McNigley quickly approached him. The officers demanded to see his ID, claiming he was acting suspiciously by filming patrol vehicles and insisting the area was "private county property." Class is in session from that point on. The journalist stood his ground on Identification: He calmly educates the officers on the law, reminding them that North Carolina is not a "stop and identify" state. Without reasonable, articulable suspicion of a crime, law enforcement cannot compel a citizen to present identification. Refuting the "Private Property" Myth: When the deputies claim the parking lot is private county property, the journalist correctly counters that public facilities funded by taxpayers are subject to public access and First Amendment protection when visible from public space. De-escalating the Pressure: Despite repeated attempts at intimidation and circular arguments about authority, the journalist remains composed, eventually forcing the officers to admit he is not being detained. In the end, the officers are forced to let him walk away—proving once again why understanding your constitutional rights is your greatest defense. The journalist did an incredible job refusing to bow to unlawful demands and standing tall for civil liberties. This is how it's done.

Giggling Ganon

28,175 次观看 • 2 个月前

Police and sheriff department violate rights of journalist end up costing the city $9500 dollars in a settlement. A journalist entered the Silverthorne Post Office to peacefully film public-access areas like the lobby and bulletin boards. Objecting to the camera, postal employees called local law enforcement to remove him. When officers from the Silverthorne Police Department and a Summit County Sheriff’s deputy arrived, they attempted to trespass the journalist at the request of the local postmaster. The fundamental breakdown in this interaction stems from a misunderstanding of public property rules. Under federal regulation 39 CFR § 232.1 (colloquially known as USPS Poster 7), citizens have an explicit right to take photographs and record video for news purposes in public spaces—such as lobbies, foyers, and corridors—provided they do not disrupt postal operations. While the journalist correctly argued his rights on federal property, local officers mistakenly attempted to treat the federal building like private property, enforcing a trespass order based on the staff’s "feelings" rather than an actual violation of law. The journalist didn't let the violation of his civil liberties slide. Following the encounter, he pursued legal action against the municipality for violating his First Amendment rights. Rather than dragging the case through a lengthy, expensive federal civil rights lawsuit, the Town of Silverthorne ultimately agreed to a $9,500 economic settlement with the journalist. While the town did not formally admit liability, Silverthorne's Police Chief later acknowledged that his officers would handle the situation completely differently given a second chance. I can't stress enough how important it is to understand your rights and how vital that it is that we stand up for those rights when confronted by tyrants like these officers try to step on those rights.

Police and sheriff department violate rights of journalist end up costing the city $9500 dollars in a settlement. A journalist entered the Silverthorne Post Office to peacefully film public-access areas like the lobby and bulletin boards. Objecting to the camera, postal employees called local law enforcement to remove him. When officers from the Silverthorne Police Department and a Summit County Sheriff’s deputy arrived, they attempted to trespass the journalist at the request of the local postmaster. The fundamental breakdown in this interaction stems from a misunderstanding of public property rules. Under federal regulation 39 CFR § 232.1 (colloquially known as USPS Poster 7), citizens have an explicit right to take photographs and record video for news purposes in public spaces—such as lobbies, foyers, and corridors—provided they do not disrupt postal operations. While the journalist correctly argued his rights on federal property, local officers mistakenly attempted to treat the federal building like private property, enforcing a trespass order based on the staff’s "feelings" rather than an actual violation of law. The journalist didn't let the violation of his civil liberties slide. Following the encounter, he pursued legal action against the municipality for violating his First Amendment rights. Rather than dragging the case through a lengthy, expensive federal civil rights lawsuit, the Town of Silverthorne ultimately agreed to a $9,500 economic settlement with the journalist. While the town did not formally admit liability, Silverthorne's Police Chief later acknowledged that his officers would handle the situation completely differently given a second chance. I can't stress enough how important it is to understand your rights and how vital that it is that we stand up for those rights when confronted by tyrants like these officers try to step on those rights.

Giggling Ganon

13,349 次观看 • 3 个月前

Country security guard thinks his rules supersede the law. This bodycam footage from Montgomery County, Tennessee, captures one of the most stunning, blatant misunderstandings of basic law you will ever see from a county security officer. What starts as a standard First Amendment audit at a county government building quickly devolves into an extreme case of ego-driven overreach, leaving a county sheriff's deputy stuck playing law professor to an incredibly hostile and incompetent guard. The situation is simple: A citizen journalist is on public property, outside a government facility, filming. She is exercising her constitutional rights. With absolute, unearned confidence, this guard approaches the auditor and demands she stop filming, declaring that government property is "not public property." Let that sink in for a moment. Someone hired to protect a public county facility genuinely believes that the public has no right to be there, and that a citizen requires permission from a facilities manager just to stand on the sidewalk with a camera. When a Montgomery County sheriff’s deputy arrives, things take a truly bizarre turn. Instead of backing down when actual law enforcement arrives, the guard doubles down. The deputy, after confirming the law with his superiors, calmly explains to the guard that the auditor is entirely within her legal rights. The ground is public. No laws are being broken. But ego is a powerful thing. Instead of accepting the correction, the guard snaps. He begins yelling at the deputy, arguing that his internal company policy somehow supersedes constitutional law. He literally tries to pull rank on a sworn law enforcement officer, claiming the rules are his to enforce and threatening to call higher-ups to get his way. It gets worse. When the auditor attempts to walk into the building to file a legitimate public records request—a fundamental right of every American citizen—the guard says he will physically remove her. "You're not going in that building," he barks, threatening removal if she tries to step past him. Watching this level of aggression and ignorance play out is infuriating, but it also forces you to ask a much darker question: How many citizens has this man violated the rights of during his career? How many everyday people, intimidated by the uniform and the aggressive posture, simply complied and walked away? How many people were denied access to public records, forced off public sidewalks, or unlawfully detained because this man weaponized his ignorance? First Amendment auditors often take a lot of heat, but this video is the exact reason why accountability filming is so vital. Without a camera rolling, this guard's word would have been taken over an ordinary citizen's every single time. Fortunately, accountability caught up with him. Once this bodycam footage made its way to the public and county officials saw the liability walking around their complex, action was taken. The guard was officially removed from his position at the facility. It is a stark reminder that a uniform is a responsibility, not a license to bully. If you are tasked with protecting a public space, you better understand the rights of the public you are serving.

Country security guard thinks his rules supersede the law. This bodycam footage from Montgomery County, Tennessee, captures one of the most stunning, blatant misunderstandings of basic law you will ever see from a county security officer. What starts as a standard First Amendment audit at a county government building quickly devolves into an extreme case of ego-driven overreach, leaving a county sheriff's deputy stuck playing law professor to an incredibly hostile and incompetent guard. The situation is simple: A citizen journalist is on public property, outside a government facility, filming. She is exercising her constitutional rights. With absolute, unearned confidence, this guard approaches the auditor and demands she stop filming, declaring that government property is "not public property." Let that sink in for a moment. Someone hired to protect a public county facility genuinely believes that the public has no right to be there, and that a citizen requires permission from a facilities manager just to stand on the sidewalk with a camera. When a Montgomery County sheriff’s deputy arrives, things take a truly bizarre turn. Instead of backing down when actual law enforcement arrives, the guard doubles down. The deputy, after confirming the law with his superiors, calmly explains to the guard that the auditor is entirely within her legal rights. The ground is public. No laws are being broken. But ego is a powerful thing. Instead of accepting the correction, the guard snaps. He begins yelling at the deputy, arguing that his internal company policy somehow supersedes constitutional law. He literally tries to pull rank on a sworn law enforcement officer, claiming the rules are his to enforce and threatening to call higher-ups to get his way. It gets worse. When the auditor attempts to walk into the building to file a legitimate public records request—a fundamental right of every American citizen—the guard says he will physically remove her. "You're not going in that building," he barks, threatening removal if she tries to step past him. Watching this level of aggression and ignorance play out is infuriating, but it also forces you to ask a much darker question: How many citizens has this man violated the rights of during his career? How many everyday people, intimidated by the uniform and the aggressive posture, simply complied and walked away? How many people were denied access to public records, forced off public sidewalks, or unlawfully detained because this man weaponized his ignorance? First Amendment auditors often take a lot of heat, but this video is the exact reason why accountability filming is so vital. Without a camera rolling, this guard's word would have been taken over an ordinary citizen's every single time. Fortunately, accountability caught up with him. Once this bodycam footage made its way to the public and county officials saw the liability walking around their complex, action was taken. The guard was officially removed from his position at the facility. It is a stark reminder that a uniform is a responsibility, not a license to bully. If you are tasked with protecting a public space, you better understand the rights of the public you are serving.

Giggling Gannon

39,827 次观看 • 4 个月前

"If you've ever heard of the Lady before, she's actually my teacher." Christopher Gray was a user on UFO twitter who murdered his father in 2021 by stabbing him 110 times. He recorded a video of the murder and sent it to many people. Chistopher Gray thought he was in communication with The Lady that Chris Bledsoe was in contact with. He mentions the Lady and the Bledsoe's in his murder video. It is unclear how much communication he had with the bledsoe's. Chris Gray was utilized as a #ufohategroup attack dog and would partake in coordinated doxxing and harassment with Johnathan Davies. It is my opinion the Bledsoe's were not aware of this dynamic or the people above gray and davies who were weaponizing him. Johnathan Davies did serve as a liaison for people seeking faith healings from Bledsoe during that time. Chris Gray sent his murder video to many prominent figures in ufology and NO ONE spoke about it. This tragedy should have been a learning moment for this community, instead there was a coordinated doxxing and harassment campaign against any one who spoke of this. Speaking of this was seen as hurting disclosure due to Gray’s proximity to prominent UFO figures To be clear I do not think Chris Bledsoe is in any way responsible for this murder nor anyone else. I do think whoever was working Chris Gray up behind the scenes and pointing him at people to harass bears some responsibility for his deteriorating mental state which did factor into the murder. And like I said the way this murder was brushed under the rug in this community I find disturbing. This video is of Moran Lerner, someone tracking Gray during that time. breaking down of the situation, the email to prominent UFO figures, and an playing audio call of Chris Gray to his brother immediately after murdering his father where he mentions the Bledsoe Lady. The Chris Gray story is one of the many reasons why I am so annoyed about the dangers when mentally unstable people are weaponized by nefarious actors in the shadows. (00:00) Moran Lerner on Gray and Davies and doxxing (03:04) The Chris Gray Email to UFO Figures (06:56) Chris Gray audio calling his brother after murdering his father (10:40) Moran Lerner closing

"If you've ever heard of the Lady before, she's actually my teacher." Christopher Gray was a user on UFO twitter who murdered his father in 2021 by stabbing him 110 times. He recorded a video of the murder and sent it to many people. Chistopher Gray thought he was in communication with The Lady that Chris Bledsoe was in contact with. He mentions the Lady and the Bledsoe's in his murder video. It is unclear how much communication he had with the bledsoe's. Chris Gray was utilized as a #ufohategroup attack dog and would partake in coordinated doxxing and harassment with Johnathan Davies. It is my opinion the Bledsoe's were not aware of this dynamic or the people above gray and davies who were weaponizing him. Johnathan Davies did serve as a liaison for people seeking faith healings from Bledsoe during that time. Chris Gray sent his murder video to many prominent figures in ufology and NO ONE spoke about it. This tragedy should have been a learning moment for this community, instead there was a coordinated doxxing and harassment campaign against any one who spoke of this. Speaking of this was seen as hurting disclosure due to Gray’s proximity to prominent UFO figures To be clear I do not think Chris Bledsoe is in any way responsible for this murder nor anyone else. I do think whoever was working Chris Gray up behind the scenes and pointing him at people to harass bears some responsibility for his deteriorating mental state which did factor into the murder. And like I said the way this murder was brushed under the rug in this community I find disturbing. This video is of Moran Lerner, someone tracking Gray during that time. breaking down of the situation, the email to prominent UFO figures, and an playing audio call of Chris Gray to his brother immediately after murdering his father where he mentions the Bledsoe Lady. The Chris Gray story is one of the many reasons why I am so annoyed about the dangers when mentally unstable people are weaponized by nefarious actors in the shadows. (00:00) Moran Lerner on Gray and Davies and doxxing (03:04) The Chris Gray Email to UFO Figures (06:56) Chris Gray audio calling his brother after murdering his father (10:40) Moran Lerner closing

Red Panda Koala

233,176 次观看 • 1 年前

An 80-year-old man with Parkinson's disease arrested for trespassing on his own property by incompetent officers... Here is the full backstory behind the encounter: The entire incident centered around a civil disagreement over property rights. According to Volusia County property appraiser records and mortgage statements, Edward Bowman is a rightful owner of the home and property, and he actively pays the mortgage on it. His stepdaughter also shares ownership rights to the home and property. A tenant living in a mother-in-law suite situated behind the main house called the police to report that Bowman and his stepdaughter were trespassing. The tenant claimed that Bowman lived on the property but did not own the specific house they were entering, arguing they had no right to be there. When Orange City Police officers arrived, the stepdaughter tried to explain that she had already spoken with a deputy earlier that morning who confirmed the situation was a civil property matter. However, the responding officers refused to listen to her explanation, giving her and Bowman a single warning to leave or face arrest. The Stepdaughter's Arrest: Officers arrested her for trespass. Despite her name being on the property appraiser site, police also attempted to charge her with possession of a firearm while trespassing because she had a licensed firearm in her pocket. Edward Bowman's Arrest: Despite Bowman explicitly stating, "This is my property," officers still handcuffed him and arrested him for trespassing. The city manager and the chief of police launched a formal review of the circumstances surrounding the incident. The Stepdaughter: All criminal charges against her were subsequently dropped after legal review confirmed her ownership status. Edward Bowman: Despite the property records proving his ownership, the police department pursued charges against him for trespass and resisting an officer without violence. The police officers also claimed that Edward had a$saulted them. Current Legal Status: Edward Bowan’s case remains active in the court system. His family and legal team are actively fighting the system and working to get the remaining charges completely dropped. While the state attorney's office ultimately dismissed the case against his stepdaughter, they have not yet formally dismissed the resisting charges against Bowman. The defense is heavily leveraging the property deeds and the video evidence—which shows his severe physical limitations—to pressure the state into throwing out the case.

An 80-year-old man with Parkinson's disease arrested for trespassing on his own property by incompetent officers... Here is the full backstory behind the encounter: The entire incident centered around a civil disagreement over property rights. According to Volusia County property appraiser records and mortgage statements, Edward Bowman is a rightful owner of the home and property, and he actively pays the mortgage on it. His stepdaughter also shares ownership rights to the home and property. A tenant living in a mother-in-law suite situated behind the main house called the police to report that Bowman and his stepdaughter were trespassing. The tenant claimed that Bowman lived on the property but did not own the specific house they were entering, arguing they had no right to be there. When Orange City Police officers arrived, the stepdaughter tried to explain that she had already spoken with a deputy earlier that morning who confirmed the situation was a civil property matter. However, the responding officers refused to listen to her explanation, giving her and Bowman a single warning to leave or face arrest. The Stepdaughter's Arrest: Officers arrested her for trespass. Despite her name being on the property appraiser site, police also attempted to charge her with possession of a firearm while trespassing because she had a licensed firearm in her pocket. Edward Bowman's Arrest: Despite Bowman explicitly stating, "This is my property," officers still handcuffed him and arrested him for trespassing. The city manager and the chief of police launched a formal review of the circumstances surrounding the incident. The Stepdaughter: All criminal charges against her were subsequently dropped after legal review confirmed her ownership status. Edward Bowman: Despite the property records proving his ownership, the police department pursued charges against him for trespass and resisting an officer without violence. The police officers also claimed that Edward had a$saulted them. Current Legal Status: Edward Bowan’s case remains active in the court system. His family and legal team are actively fighting the system and working to get the remaining charges completely dropped. While the state attorney's office ultimately dismissed the case against his stepdaughter, they have not yet formally dismissed the resisting charges against Bowman. The defense is heavily leveraging the property deeds and the video evidence—which shows his severe physical limitations—to pressure the state into throwing out the case.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

36,394 次观看 • 4 个月前

🎥A First Amendment auditor was filming at the Lee County Jail in Florida when a female corrections deputy approached him. She told him he was in an unauthorized area, and directed him leave go to the adjacent parking lot. He refused, saying the area wasn’t gated, he’d recorded there before, and it was county property. She asked him to leave. He noted she was asking, not ordering. She called for backup. The clip is a classic public-access vs. facility-control standoff. ❓Is an ungated jail lot a public forum for recording, or can staff restrict it on a whim? ❓What do you think of the actions of the male deputy who arrived on scene and communicated with the auditor.

🎥A First Amendment auditor was filming at the Lee County Jail in Florida when a female corrections deputy approached him. She told him he was in an unauthorized area, and directed him leave go to the adjacent parking lot. He refused, saying the area wasn’t gated, he’d recorded there before, and it was county property. She asked him to leave. He noted she was asking, not ordering. She called for backup. The clip is a classic public-access vs. facility-control standoff. ❓Is an ungated jail lot a public forum for recording, or can staff restrict it on a whim? ❓What do you think of the actions of the male deputy who arrived on scene and communicated with the auditor.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

20,504 次观看 • 1 个月前

Here is a wild one. Riverside deputy Martin Huizar is called out to the residence of Adele Shirley on a noise complaint. One of the children in the house opened the door when the deputy knocked and immediately closed it once they saw the deputy. Deputy Huizar took it upon himself to open the door and enter the home. Once in the home Adele the home owner told him to leave as he does not have a warrant. The Deputy refuses claiming he owns her home since he is inside. Things escalate after Adele asks for a supervisor and the deputy grabs her and placed her under arrest. This is a classic violation of the 4th amendment good on Adele for standing her ground. The Deputy has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation. Adele has filed a civil suit against the county which is still on going with the last update in Nov 2025. No official word on trial, settlement, or the status of the charges brought on Adele by the deputy (which most likely will be dismissed.)

Here is a wild one. Riverside deputy Martin Huizar is called out to the residence of Adele Shirley on a noise complaint. One of the children in the house opened the door when the deputy knocked and immediately closed it once they saw the deputy. Deputy Huizar took it upon himself to open the door and enter the home. Once in the home Adele the home owner told him to leave as he does not have a warrant. The Deputy refuses claiming he owns her home since he is inside. Things escalate after Adele asks for a supervisor and the deputy grabs her and placed her under arrest. This is a classic violation of the 4th amendment good on Adele for standing her ground. The Deputy has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation. Adele has filed a civil suit against the county which is still on going with the last update in Nov 2025. No official word on trial, settlement, or the status of the charges brought on Adele by the deputy (which most likely will be dismissed.)

Giggling Ganon

120,160 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is how you educate officers that clearly do not understand the law or their job. As the conversation goes on you can see the the male officer realizes he is wrong but instead of taking the L he tries to double down on his error but in the end is forced to do that walk of shame. COEUR D’ALENE, IDAHO — Public Rights vs. State Property: First Amendment Auditor Threatened with Arrest for Obstructing Outside State-Run Liquor Store. What happens when a state-run business tries to trespass a citizen from public property for filming? This intense confrontation breaks down the exact legal battleground between a First Amendment auditor and the Coeur d'Alene Police Department. The videographer was standing on the sidewalk outside a state-owned and operated liquor store, exercising his right to film and take photographs. Taking issue with being recorded, a store employee confronted the auditor and requested he leave. When the auditor refused—maintaining he was on public property—management called law enforcement to issue a formal trespass warning. When Officer J. Chaffin and Officer C. Ziegler arrived on the scene, a massive constitutional debate unfolded: The Auditor’s Stance: Because the liquor store is a state-owned entity, the surrounding property and sidewalks are publicly funded, open spaces. He argues that citizens cannot be trespassed from public property unless they are actively committing a crime, asserting his 1st Amendment right to record and 4th Amendment right against unlawful seizure. The Police Stance: Officers countered that even though the business is state-run, it functions as a commercial space open for public commerce. They argued that management retains the right to refuse service and remove individuals deemed disruptive, and that refusing to leave constitutes criminal trespass. The ID Demand: Officer Chaffin demands the auditor’s identification, explicitly stating that failure to comply will result in an immediate arrest for obstructing and resisting. Qualified Immunity Threatened: While complying under the threat of arrest, the auditor fires back, telling Officer Ziegler that the department is violating his constitutional rights and that they will face a personal lawsuit and lose their qualified immunity. The "Hypothetical" Stand-off: Officer Ziegler attempts to use hypothetical scenarios to justify the trespass order, but the auditor shuts it down, demanding they stick to the reality: he was standing 20 to 30 feet away, completely peaceful, minding his own business. Ultimately, the officers documented his information, issued the official trespass warning, and walked away without making an arrest—leaving the auditor to give them a parting shot as they drove off.

This is how you educate officers that clearly do not understand the law or their job. As the conversation goes on you can see the the male officer realizes he is wrong but instead of taking the L he tries to double down on his error but in the end is forced to do that walk of shame. COEUR D’ALENE, IDAHO — Public Rights vs. State Property: First Amendment Auditor Threatened with Arrest for Obstructing Outside State-Run Liquor Store. What happens when a state-run business tries to trespass a citizen from public property for filming? This intense confrontation breaks down the exact legal battleground between a First Amendment auditor and the Coeur d'Alene Police Department. The videographer was standing on the sidewalk outside a state-owned and operated liquor store, exercising his right to film and take photographs. Taking issue with being recorded, a store employee confronted the auditor and requested he leave. When the auditor refused—maintaining he was on public property—management called law enforcement to issue a formal trespass warning. When Officer J. Chaffin and Officer C. Ziegler arrived on the scene, a massive constitutional debate unfolded: The Auditor’s Stance: Because the liquor store is a state-owned entity, the surrounding property and sidewalks are publicly funded, open spaces. He argues that citizens cannot be trespassed from public property unless they are actively committing a crime, asserting his 1st Amendment right to record and 4th Amendment right against unlawful seizure. The Police Stance: Officers countered that even though the business is state-run, it functions as a commercial space open for public commerce. They argued that management retains the right to refuse service and remove individuals deemed disruptive, and that refusing to leave constitutes criminal trespass. The ID Demand: Officer Chaffin demands the auditor’s identification, explicitly stating that failure to comply will result in an immediate arrest for obstructing and resisting. Qualified Immunity Threatened: While complying under the threat of arrest, the auditor fires back, telling Officer Ziegler that the department is violating his constitutional rights and that they will face a personal lawsuit and lose their qualified immunity. The "Hypothetical" Stand-off: Officer Ziegler attempts to use hypothetical scenarios to justify the trespass order, but the auditor shuts it down, demanding they stick to the reality: he was standing 20 to 30 feet away, completely peaceful, minding his own business. Ultimately, the officers documented his information, issued the official trespass warning, and walked away without making an arrest—leaving the auditor to give them a parting shot as they drove off.

Giggling Gannon

67,133 次观看 • 4 个月前

Warrantless Entry from chief of police & Taser Arrest of former deputy Leads to Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit. Buhl, Idaho resident and former deputy Eli Johnson was pulled over by officers for allegedly traveling 41 mph in a 25 mph zone. Johnson pulled directly into his own driveway. While the stopping officer stepped back to his patrol vehicle to retrieve a citation book, Johnson exited his car and walked toward his house. Despite being ordered to remain by his vehicle, Johnson went inside his home, arguing that officers had no proof of speeding and demanding to speak with a supervisor. When Buhl Police Chief Jeremy Engbaum arrived at the scene, Johnson opened his front door to speak with the chief while standing within the entry threshold of his home. Officers instructed him to step outside to receive the traffic ticket, warning that failing to do so constituted obstruction and delaying an officer. Johnson agreed to being issued the citation but said he was staying in the safety of his home. Showing an understanding of his rights, Johnson refused to step outside and requested to speak his attorney and wait for witnesses because he does not trust the chief. When Johnson attempted to close his front door, the chief physically blocked the threshold with his foot to prevent it from shutting. Officers then forcefully opened the door, entered without a warrant into the entryway, deployed a Taser on Johnson, and pulled him outside onto his lawn to place him under arrest. While Johnson was initially charged with multiple offenses following the incident, all criminal charges against him were later dismissed. Johnson subsequently filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Johnson et al. v. City of Buhl et al.) alleging that officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights through warrantless entry, unreasonable search and seizure, and excessive force. During summary judgment proceedings, U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco ruled that the officers violated the Fourth Amendment by crossing the doorway threshold into the home without a warrant or exigent circumstances. Addressing the deployment of the Taser and use of force, the court noted that body camera footage was "quick, chaotic and confusing," leaving key facts for a jury to evaluate. Following the summary judgment rulings, the parties entered court-ordered settlement negotiations, ultimately reaching an agreement that led to an official Order of Dismissal to close the federal civil rights case. The was settled for an undisclosed amount.

Warrantless Entry from chief of police & Taser Arrest of former deputy Leads to Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit. Buhl, Idaho resident and former deputy Eli Johnson was pulled over by officers for allegedly traveling 41 mph in a 25 mph zone. Johnson pulled directly into his own driveway. While the stopping officer stepped back to his patrol vehicle to retrieve a citation book, Johnson exited his car and walked toward his house. Despite being ordered to remain by his vehicle, Johnson went inside his home, arguing that officers had no proof of speeding and demanding to speak with a supervisor. When Buhl Police Chief Jeremy Engbaum arrived at the scene, Johnson opened his front door to speak with the chief while standing within the entry threshold of his home. Officers instructed him to step outside to receive the traffic ticket, warning that failing to do so constituted obstruction and delaying an officer. Johnson agreed to being issued the citation but said he was staying in the safety of his home. Showing an understanding of his rights, Johnson refused to step outside and requested to speak his attorney and wait for witnesses because he does not trust the chief. When Johnson attempted to close his front door, the chief physically blocked the threshold with his foot to prevent it from shutting. Officers then forcefully opened the door, entered without a warrant into the entryway, deployed a Taser on Johnson, and pulled him outside onto his lawn to place him under arrest. While Johnson was initially charged with multiple offenses following the incident, all criminal charges against him were later dismissed. Johnson subsequently filed a federal civil rights lawsuit (Johnson et al. v. City of Buhl et al.) alleging that officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights through warrantless entry, unreasonable search and seizure, and excessive force. During summary judgment proceedings, U.S. Chief Magistrate Judge Raymond E. Patricco ruled that the officers violated the Fourth Amendment by crossing the doorway threshold into the home without a warrant or exigent circumstances. Addressing the deployment of the Taser and use of force, the court noted that body camera footage was "quick, chaotic and confusing," leaving key facts for a jury to evaluate. Following the summary judgment rulings, the parties entered court-ordered settlement negotiations, ultimately reaching an agreement that led to an official Order of Dismissal to close the federal civil rights case. The was settled for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Ganon

88,730 次观看 • 2 个月前

$This is how to handle a deputy that is fishing for crimes during a traffic stop all because he didn't like what the guy said. While driving past an active traffic stop at night, a citizen decided to exercise his First Amendment right to free speech by yelling a protected profanity out of his window: "F*ck the police!" Instead of maintaining professional composure, Harris County Sheriff's Deputy Vega immediately abandoned his current stop, ran back to his patrol vehicle, executed a U-turn, and pursued the driver. When Deputy Vega initially stopped the driver at a local gas station, he explicitly admitted his true motivation on camera, stating he pulled the vehicle over because the driver was "yelling something from [his] car." The moment the deputy realized that yelling at the police is entirely constitutionally protected speech—and does not constitute reasonable suspicion for a detention—the narrative instantly shifted. Suddenly, it became a traffic stop for a pretextual infraction: a alleged “failure to signal 100 feet before a turn.” Throughout the interaction, the driver handled the situation with a firm grasp of the law: Because he was legally carrying a firearm, he complied with Texas law by presenting both his standard Driver's License and his License to Carry (LTC). He repeatedly and successfully invoked his right to remain silent, refusing to take the bait on fishing questions like "Where are you coming from?" or "Have you had anything to drink tonight?" After finding absolutely nothing to pin on the driver, Deputy Vega was forced to issue a mere written warning for the signal infraction. The most disturbing part of the footage happens at the very end. Deputy Vega explicitly tells the driver, "The stop is over, you may leave." However, as the driver cracks open his door to adjust himself, the deputy immediately reacts by drawing his firearm on an individual he just legally released from detention. The citizen is safe, has his own documentation of the event, and plans to update on the formal complaint process, police reports, and upcoming bodycam/dashcam requests. This deputy got butt sore because he does not feel as though people should be able to have free speech, but he had to do the walk of shame.$

This is how to handle a deputy that is fishing for crimes during a traffic stop all because he didn't like what the guy said. While driving past an active traffic stop at night, a citizen decided to exercise his First Amendment right to free speech by yelling a protected profanity out of his window: "F*ck the police!" Instead of maintaining professional composure, Harris County Sheriff's Deputy Vega immediately abandoned his current stop, ran back to his patrol vehicle, executed a U-turn, and pursued the driver. When Deputy Vega initially stopped the driver at a local gas station, he explicitly admitted his true motivation on camera, stating he pulled the vehicle over because the driver was "yelling something from [his] car." The moment the deputy realized that yelling at the police is entirely constitutionally protected speech—and does not constitute reasonable suspicion for a detention—the narrative instantly shifted. Suddenly, it became a traffic stop for a pretextual infraction: a alleged “failure to signal 100 feet before a turn.” Throughout the interaction, the driver handled the situation with a firm grasp of the law: Because he was legally carrying a firearm, he complied with Texas law by presenting both his standard Driver's License and his License to Carry (LTC). He repeatedly and successfully invoked his right to remain silent, refusing to take the bait on fishing questions like "Where are you coming from?" or "Have you had anything to drink tonight?" After finding absolutely nothing to pin on the driver, Deputy Vega was forced to issue a mere written warning for the signal infraction. The most disturbing part of the footage happens at the very end. Deputy Vega explicitly tells the driver, "The stop is over, you may leave." However, as the driver cracks open his door to adjust himself, the deputy immediately reacts by drawing his firearm on an individual he just legally released from detention. The citizen is safe, has his own documentation of the event, and plans to update on the formal complaint process, police reports, and upcoming bodycam/dashcam requests. This deputy got butt sore because he does not feel as though people should be able to have free speech, but he had to do the walk of shame.

Giggling Ganon

41,426 次观看 • 3 个月前