Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 Thought Crime: This should terrify anyone who thinks thoughts are still private. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court just ruled Google search history is NOT protected by the Fourth Amendment. Why? Because you “share” searches with Google — so the court says you have no reasonable expectation of privacy. That... means police can use reverse keyword warrants to pull search data without naming a suspect. Your medical questions. Your political doubts. Your late-night curiosity. All fair game. This isn’t about criminals. It’s about whether thinking out loud online is now searchable by the state. If courts say curiosity isn’t private anymore, freedom quietly dies first. Do you still believe your searches are yours? 👇 #FourthAmendment #PrivacyRights #DigitalSurveillanceshow more

Jake

127,218 subscribers

82,758 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 This Should Terrify Every American Jack Smith’s newly released deposition isn’t just about Trump—it’s about you. He openly says calling the 2020 election fraudulent isn’t protected by the First Amendment. He labels political speech about an election as “fraud,” not free speech. That’s not law enforcement. That’s thought-policing. This isn’t a fringe topic—elections are the most protected political speech in America. If a special counsel can decide what opinions about an election are allowed, the First Amendment is already dead.

🚨 This Should Terrify Every American Jack Smith’s newly released deposition isn’t just about Trump—it’s about you. He openly says calling the 2020 election fraudulent isn’t protected by the First Amendment. He labels political speech about an election as “fraud,” not free speech. That’s not law enforcement. That’s thought-policing. This isn’t a fringe topic—elections are the most protected political speech in America. If a special counsel can decide what opinions about an election are allowed, the First Amendment is already dead.

Tom Renz

51,703 views • 7 months ago

The Supreme Court may take down Flock Cameras and the entire surveillance state being built because it violates the 4th Amendment The Supreme Court just issued a major ruling that strengthens the Fourth Amendment protections that Flock has been exploiting “On the heels of the recent Supreme Court ruling on geofencing and how that violates the Fourth Amendment, a US district judge has now ruled that tower dump warrants also violates the Fourth Amendment. As a reminder, the Supreme Court ruled that your location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment. That means the police cannot just pull your phone information via GPS without a warrant because it's considered a search, citing Carpenter v. United States This Mississippi judge is essentially calling out police for using a loophole to still grab similar data from people and is trying to close it by saying that these tower dump warrants are too general because it still grabs your location data, which is therefore subject to probable cause and more specific warrants because it's considered a search which is protected by the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court's ruling could potentially be setting Flock up for violating the same thing because Flock had previously leaned on Carpenter v. United States to claim that they are constitutionally protected and allowed to surveil and store people's data the way that they do. But that was before the Supreme Court's recent ruling.” “As much as there seems to be an uptick in surveillance systems and the digital panopticon being built around us, it also seems like there is a growing opposition towards all of this, and it seems to be quite effective” Flock even on their own website sites Carpenter v. United States as justification to why they are constitutionally allowed to operate and collected their digital data But now the Supreme Court is expanding digital data protection rights Ban Flock Cameras from America

The Supreme Court may take down Flock Cameras and the entire surveillance state being built because it violates the 4th Amendment The Supreme Court just issued a major ruling that strengthens the Fourth Amendment protections that Flock has been exploiting “On the heels of the recent Supreme Court ruling on geofencing and how that violates the Fourth Amendment, a US district judge has now ruled that tower dump warrants also violates the Fourth Amendment. As a reminder, the Supreme Court ruled that your location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment. That means the police cannot just pull your phone information via GPS without a warrant because it's considered a search, citing Carpenter v. United States This Mississippi judge is essentially calling out police for using a loophole to still grab similar data from people and is trying to close it by saying that these tower dump warrants are too general because it still grabs your location data, which is therefore subject to probable cause and more specific warrants because it's considered a search which is protected by the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court's ruling could potentially be setting Flock up for violating the same thing because Flock had previously leaned on Carpenter v. United States to claim that they are constitutionally protected and allowed to surveil and store people's data the way that they do. But that was before the Supreme Court's recent ruling.” “As much as there seems to be an uptick in surveillance systems and the digital panopticon being built around us, it also seems like there is a growing opposition towards all of this, and it seems to be quite effective” Flock even on their own website sites Carpenter v. United States as justification to why they are constitutionally allowed to operate and collected their digital data But now the Supreme Court is expanding digital data protection rights Ban Flock Cameras from America

Wall Street Apes

126,078 views • 1 day ago

Google isn’t just a search engine anymore. People still go there to ask questions. But now Google doesn’t just give them links. It reads the websites, pulls the information together, and gives them the answer right on the page. So your job has changed. You’re not just trying to rank for the question anymore. You’re trying to become part of the answer. And that means generic content whether it’s a blog post, a LinkedIn post, or a social media video is losing value fast. If your content says the same thing as everyone else, Google doesn’t really need you. So don’t start by asking, “What should I post?” Start by asking, “What is my market already asking?” Use a tool like AnswerThePublic to find the real questions people are already asking in your market. You can type in your niche and see the real questions, comparisons, fears, and how-tos people are actually typing into google, ChatGPT, Instagram, Tiktok Youtube right now. That becomes your content map for blogs. For LinkedIn. For YouTube. For short-form videos. But the key is: don’t answer those questions generically. Add your data. Your examples. Your customer conversations. Your experience. Your proof. Because in the new Google, the winner isn’t always the page that ranks. It’s the source that gets used.

Google isn’t just a search engine anymore. People still go there to ask questions. But now Google doesn’t just give them links. It reads the websites, pulls the information together, and gives them the answer right on the page. So your job has changed. You’re not just trying to rank for the question anymore. You’re trying to become part of the answer. And that means generic content whether it’s a blog post, a LinkedIn post, or a social media video is losing value fast. If your content says the same thing as everyone else, Google doesn’t really need you. So don’t start by asking, “What should I post?” Start by asking, “What is my market already asking?” Use a tool like AnswerThePublic to find the real questions people are already asking in your market. You can type in your niche and see the real questions, comparisons, fears, and how-tos people are actually typing into google, ChatGPT, Instagram, Tiktok Youtube right now. That becomes your content map for blogs. For LinkedIn. For YouTube. For short-form videos. But the key is: don’t answer those questions generically. Add your data. Your examples. Your customer conversations. Your experience. Your proof. Because in the new Google, the winner isn’t always the page that ranks. It’s the source that gets used.

Neil Patel

13,990 views • 20 days ago

Google just turned every TikTok, Instagram Reel, and YouTube Short into part of your SEO strategy. Google Search Console can now show you which searches lead people to your social posts, along with clicks, impressions, and average search position. So your video doesn’t have to disappear after two days in the feed. It can keep getting discovered when someone searches for that topic on Google. But there’s a catch. More searchable content also means more average content. So don’t start by asking AI for 50 random ideas. Start with real demand. Go to AnswerThePublic, type in the topic you want to be known for, and look at the questions people are already searching. Let’s say you search “losing weight.” You might see: “Why am I not losing weight?” “Can one cheat day ruin my progress?” “Why do I gain weight on the weekends?” The average video says, “Eat less and exercise more.” But now you can use AI as a thought partner to connect the dots and find a sharper angle: “You’re not failing during the week. You’re undoing it every weekend.” That’s the difference. Find the demand. Add the angle. Make the best answer on the internet.

Google just turned every TikTok, Instagram Reel, and YouTube Short into part of your SEO strategy. Google Search Console can now show you which searches lead people to your social posts, along with clicks, impressions, and average search position. So your video doesn’t have to disappear after two days in the feed. It can keep getting discovered when someone searches for that topic on Google. But there’s a catch. More searchable content also means more average content. So don’t start by asking AI for 50 random ideas. Start with real demand. Go to AnswerThePublic, type in the topic you want to be known for, and look at the questions people are already searching. Let’s say you search “losing weight.” You might see: “Why am I not losing weight?” “Can one cheat day ruin my progress?” “Why do I gain weight on the weekends?” The average video says, “Eat less and exercise more.” But now you can use AI as a thought partner to connect the dots and find a sharper angle: “You’re not failing during the week. You’re undoing it every weekend.” That’s the difference. Find the demand. Add the angle. Make the best answer on the internet.

Neil Patel

16,427 views • 13 days ago

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

Colion Noir

51,437 views • 1 month ago

I've been watching organic traffic drop across hundreds of client accounts while rankings stay perfectly stable, and I need to tell you exactly what's happening and why it won't reverse. Google is not broken. Google is doing this on purpose because ChatGPT and other AI systems forced them to keep users on the search results page instead of sending them to yours. The new game is not about ranking number one. It's about being cited inside AI-generated answers on Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, and the brands winning that game built their presence across the entire internet, not just their own website. If you are still reporting keyword rankings to your executive team, you are measuring a game that already ended.

I've been watching organic traffic drop across hundreds of client accounts while rankings stay perfectly stable, and I need to tell you exactly what's happening and why it won't reverse. Google is not broken. Google is doing this on purpose because ChatGPT and other AI systems forced them to keep users on the search results page instead of sending them to yours. The new game is not about ranking number one. It's about being cited inside AI-generated answers on Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini, and the brands winning that game built their presence across the entire internet, not just their own website. If you are still reporting keyword rankings to your executive team, you are measuring a game that already ended.

Neil Patel

32,261 views • 2 months ago

Sarah Guo (Conviction) says founders fear the wrong thing, because a giant like Google only ever has one A-team and your product is its 27th priority. "One really important thing for founders to think about is, who are you really competing with? If you are competing with Google Search and Google Ads, you're competing with the A-team at Google. They're pretty good, right? They do know how to do that stuff... But the vast majority of products that any large incumbent has is not staffed by the A-team, because there's only one A-team, right? And so if your product is the 27th priority for Google, it's actually not that scary."

Sarah Guo (Conviction) says founders fear the wrong thing, because a giant like Google only ever has one A-team and your product is its 27th priority. "One really important thing for founders to think about is, who are you really competing with? If you are competing with Google Search and Google Ads, you're competing with the A-team at Google. They're pretty good, right? They do know how to do that stuff... But the vast majority of products that any large incumbent has is not staffed by the A-team, because there's only one A-team, right? And so if your product is the 27th priority for Google, it's actually not that scary."

Fireside Alpha

275,709 views • 26 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: Pritzker’s New Law Will FORCE Mental Health Screenings on Illinois Kids – Who the Hell Does He Think He Is?! 🚨 Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has just signed a first-in-the-nation law mandating mental health evaluations for every student from 3rd grade through 12th grade — whether parents like it or not. That’s right. Starting in the 2027–2028 school year, the state will decide if your child’s mind needs “evaluating.” Sure, they say parents can “opt out” — but will they even tell you every year? Who will have access to your child’s most private mental health data? And what will they do with it? This isn’t just about kids’ wellbeing. This is about government overreach, political agendas in our classrooms, and a direct slap in the face to our 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable searches. The state has no business prying into the inner thoughts and feelings of your child without YOUR consent. Pritzker is handing the keys to your kids’ minds over to bureaucrats, political activists, and big-money “mental health” contractors. This isn’t compassion — it’s control. 💥 Parents: WAKE UP. Today it’s screenings. Tomorrow? Who knows. From Fox News

🚨 BREAKING: Pritzker’s New Law Will FORCE Mental Health Screenings on Illinois Kids – Who the Hell Does He Think He Is?! 🚨 Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has just signed a first-in-the-nation law mandating mental health evaluations for every student from 3rd grade through 12th grade — whether parents like it or not. That’s right. Starting in the 2027–2028 school year, the state will decide if your child’s mind needs “evaluating.” Sure, they say parents can “opt out” — but will they even tell you every year? Who will have access to your child’s most private mental health data? And what will they do with it? This isn’t just about kids’ wellbeing. This is about government overreach, political agendas in our classrooms, and a direct slap in the face to our 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable searches. The state has no business prying into the inner thoughts and feelings of your child without YOUR consent. Pritzker is handing the keys to your kids’ minds over to bureaucrats, political activists, and big-money “mental health” contractors. This isn’t compassion — it’s control. 💥 Parents: WAKE UP. Today it’s screenings. Tomorrow? Who knows. From Fox News

Project Constitution

42,200 views • 1 year ago

J-Cal Explains Why Google is UNDERRATED in AI 👀 On E227, the besties discussed Google's value in a post-search world if AI replaces traditional search. @jason broke down why he thinks Google is being slept on: "I think there's a chance that we're underestimating the power of Google's ad network right now." "They have four or five products that are one or two billion users per month. You have YouTube, Google Docs, Android." "They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services, I think Google's gonna figure this out." "It's quite possible that knowing your queries in Gemini, knowing what you're doing in Calendar, knowing what you're watching on YouTube could lead to a stream of more targeted ads that do better and are more valuable." "We've been seeing a number of startups that are figuring out how to use your queries and what you're doing in AI to present to you search results." "So imagine you're doing a Gemini search and on the side of it, it's giving you a rolling list of ads or offers that you might be more interested in." "That could be a better advertising product than even search itself." "I think YouTube search is the place to go all-in." "Right now, when you do a YouTube search, it just gives you 10 links, right? It just gives you that rolling thing." "You should be able to ask a question to YouTube, and you should be able to ask questions to your calendar." "You should be able to say, who have I met with over the last 10 years? Who I'm no longer in touch with and what are they up to?" "And it should do a Gemini search inside of Google Calendar. It's very light right now." "And then if you did that on YouTube, this would train people at the point of pain in a very deep way without sacrificing Google Search queries too aggressively."

J-Cal Explains Why Google is UNDERRATED in AI 👀 On E227, the besties discussed Google's value in a post-search world if AI replaces traditional search. @jason broke down why he thinks Google is being slept on: "I think there's a chance that we're underestimating the power of Google's ad network right now." "They have four or five products that are one or two billion users per month. You have YouTube, Google Docs, Android." "They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services, I think Google's gonna figure this out." "It's quite possible that knowing your queries in Gemini, knowing what you're doing in Calendar, knowing what you're watching on YouTube could lead to a stream of more targeted ads that do better and are more valuable." "We've been seeing a number of startups that are figuring out how to use your queries and what you're doing in AI to present to you search results." "So imagine you're doing a Gemini search and on the side of it, it's giving you a rolling list of ads or offers that you might be more interested in." "That could be a better advertising product than even search itself." "I think YouTube search is the place to go all-in." "Right now, when you do a YouTube search, it just gives you 10 links, right? It just gives you that rolling thing." "You should be able to ask a question to YouTube, and you should be able to ask questions to your calendar." "You should be able to say, who have I met with over the last 10 years? Who I'm no longer in touch with and what are they up to?" "And it should do a Gemini search inside of Google Calendar. It's very light right now." "And then if you did that on YouTube, this would train people at the point of pain in a very deep way without sacrificing Google Search queries too aggressively."

The All-In Podcast

58,275 views • 1 year ago

Online dangers are real, and sextortion is one of the most harmful. It starts with someone pretending to be a friend, then using your private photos or messages to threaten and control you. This isn’t just scary—it’s a crime. Protect yourself by being careful what you share, keeping your accounts private, and speaking up if you face any threats. Awareness is the first step to staying safe. Don’t let fear silence you—help is always available.

Online dangers are real, and sextortion is one of the most harmful. It starts with someone pretending to be a friend, then using your private photos or messages to threaten and control you. This isn’t just scary—it’s a crime. Protect yourself by being careful what you share, keeping your accounts private, and speaking up if you face any threats. Awareness is the first step to staying safe. Don’t let fear silence you—help is always available.

Stringg

29,010 views • 1 year ago

Are you happy to just hand over your digital data to the government? Police need a warrant to search your home. But Chris Minns wants to let them force you to unlock your phone and hand over every message, photo, deleted file, location history, and private conversation, without one. Right now, a Digital Evidence Access Order must be tied to a search warrant. Refuse to comply and you already face up to 5 years in prison. His new laws will remove that warrant requirement for “organised crime” cases, as long as police have already seized your phone during an arrest or stop. They’re using Cellebrite, the Israeli forensic tool that rips near-total data from locked devices. It’s already been used on protesters and ordinary people, not just career criminals. Here’s the reality: your phone contains more of your life than your house ever did. Giving police easier power to demand full access lowers the barrier between investigation and fishing expedition. “Organised crime” is an elastic category. What starts as a tool against syndicates expands to anyone who becomes inconvenient, activists, journalists, political opponents, or regular citizens who cross the wrong line. Once your entire digital existence sits in government databases with reduced judicial oversight, that data doesn’t disappear. It can be stored, shared, or weaponised later. This isn’t modernisation. It’s the quiet expansion of state power over your private thoughts, associations, and movements. Privacy isn’t a luxury the government grants you. It’s a hard limit on their authority. Remove the warrant safeguard here and the principle that protects all of us erodes. This is how your liberty dies, not with dramatic announcements, but with “reasonable” expansions sold as fighting crime.

Are you happy to just hand over your digital data to the government? Police need a warrant to search your home. But Chris Minns wants to let them force you to unlock your phone and hand over every message, photo, deleted file, location history, and private conversation, without one. Right now, a Digital Evidence Access Order must be tied to a search warrant. Refuse to comply and you already face up to 5 years in prison. His new laws will remove that warrant requirement for “organised crime” cases, as long as police have already seized your phone during an arrest or stop. They’re using Cellebrite, the Israeli forensic tool that rips near-total data from locked devices. It’s already been used on protesters and ordinary people, not just career criminals. Here’s the reality: your phone contains more of your life than your house ever did. Giving police easier power to demand full access lowers the barrier between investigation and fishing expedition. “Organised crime” is an elastic category. What starts as a tool against syndicates expands to anyone who becomes inconvenient, activists, journalists, political opponents, or regular citizens who cross the wrong line. Once your entire digital existence sits in government databases with reduced judicial oversight, that data doesn’t disappear. It can be stored, shared, or weaponised later. This isn’t modernisation. It’s the quiet expansion of state power over your private thoughts, associations, and movements. Privacy isn’t a luxury the government grants you. It’s a hard limit on their authority. Remove the warrant safeguard here and the principle that protects all of us erodes. This is how your liberty dies, not with dramatic announcements, but with “reasonable” expansions sold as fighting crime.

The People's King Elvis

11,853 views • 1 month ago

🚨 FORMER FLOCK SAFETY EMPLOYEE JUST BROKE HIS SILENCE… 🚨 And what He Revealed Should Terrify Every Single One of Us. This isn’t “public safety.” This is a private company building a permanent, nationwide tracking grid of every car, every movement, every person… with almost zero oversight. Watch the video. Then answer these questions honestly: If a private corporation can track every vehicle in your city 24/7 and sell that data to police (and who knows who else)… do you still live in a free country? When did we collectively agree that “safety” means surrendering the right to move without being recorded? What happens the day this system gets used against political enemies, journalists, or regular people who just disagreed with the wrong person? If these cameras can already identify your car, your patterns, and your life… how long until facial recognition and AI complete the total surveillance package? And the most uncomfortable one: Would you still support this technology if the next administration (whichever side you hate) controlled the data? This man worked on the inside. He just told the truth. The silence ends now. Watch. Share. Force the conversation. The Future of Privacy is being decided in Real Time… and Most People Are Still Asleep. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are You doing!?

🚨 FORMER FLOCK SAFETY EMPLOYEE JUST BROKE HIS SILENCE… 🚨 And what He Revealed Should Terrify Every Single One of Us. This isn’t “public safety.” This is a private company building a permanent, nationwide tracking grid of every car, every movement, every person… with almost zero oversight. Watch the video. Then answer these questions honestly: If a private corporation can track every vehicle in your city 24/7 and sell that data to police (and who knows who else)… do you still live in a free country? When did we collectively agree that “safety” means surrendering the right to move without being recorded? What happens the day this system gets used against political enemies, journalists, or regular people who just disagreed with the wrong person? If these cameras can already identify your car, your patterns, and your life… how long until facial recognition and AI complete the total surveillance package? And the most uncomfortable one: Would you still support this technology if the next administration (whichever side you hate) controlled the data? This man worked on the inside. He just told the truth. The silence ends now. Watch. Share. Force the conversation. The Future of Privacy is being decided in Real Time… and Most People Are Still Asleep. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are You doing!?

Noah B. Price

41,297 views • 21 days ago

AI Overviews are showing up for more and more searches. And when they do, fewer people click. That’s the part everyone is panicking about. Google gives the answer right there, so the user doesn’t always need to visit your site. But SEO is not dead. The game just changed. Because now your job is not only to rank on Google. Your job is to become the source AI trusts enough to recommend. That means showing up in Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and all the other places people are asking questions. This is why tools like Ubersuggest matter even more now. You can use it to see what people are searching for, what questions they’re asking, what competitors rank for, and where your content gaps are. Then you turn that into better answers. Not generic blog posts. Real expertise. Real examples. Clear explanations. Content that both humans and AI can understand, trust, and cite. And your website still matters because that’s where attention turns into action. AI can summarize information. But it does not close the deal for you. It does not build the relationship. It does not replace your proof, your offer, or your brand. So save this action plan.

Neil Patel

10,183 views • 25 days ago

Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity. Carry in all 50 states. And this is about to expose a lot of people. Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines… Why shouldn’t your carry permit? If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey? An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself. And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves. Because national reciprocity is the easy one. This isn’t even the AR-15 fight. This isn’t the magazine fight. This is just saying: If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide. That is actual common sense. So watch who fights this. Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment. They were defending control. Now be honest: Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license? Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”

Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity. Carry in all 50 states. And this is about to expose a lot of people. Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines… Why shouldn’t your carry permit? If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey? An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself. And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves. Because national reciprocity is the easy one. This isn’t even the AR-15 fight. This isn’t the magazine fight. This is just saying: If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide. That is actual common sense. So watch who fights this. Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment. They were defending control. Now be honest: Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license? Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”

Colion Noir

62,177 views • 1 month ago

The next version of SEO isn’t about ranking number one. It’s about what AI says about you when someone asks. Because Google, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, they’re not just showing links anymore. They’re forming opinions. They’re comparing brands. They’re deciding who sounds credible, who sounds risky, who gets recommended, and who gets ignored. That means your biggest search problem in 2027 might not be that you don’t show up. It might be that you show up wrong. Maybe AI describes your competitor as the trusted expert… and describes you as generic. Maybe it mentions your brand… but the sentiment is neutral while your competitor is glowing. Maybe it pulls from old reviews, outdated articles, weak bios, messy positioning, or random third-party pages you didn’t even know were shaping your reputation. That’s the part most businesses are missing. AI search visibility is not just a traffic game. It’s a reputation game. And that’s why we added the Sentiment tab inside Ubersuggest’s AI Search Visibility tool. It doesn’t just track whether your brand appears across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google AI. It shows how those engines describe you. Positive, neutral, or negative. And it charts that sentiment over time against your competitors. So now you can answer the question that actually matters: Not just, “Am I showing up in AI answers?” But, “What is AI actually saying about me?”

Neil Patel

16,819 views • 21 days ago

Hawaii tried to make your concealed carry permit basically worthless. You could have the permit. You could pass the process. You could legally carry. But the second you walked into a gas station, grocery store, restaurant, or parking lot on private property… Your gun became illegal unless the owner gave you permission first. That’s not a right. That’s a permission slip. The Supreme Court just struck it down 6–3. And this matters way beyond Hawaii. New York, New Jersey, Maryland, California — they’ve all been playing the same game: Give you the right on paper. Then make it illegal almost everywhere you’d actually use it. The Court just flipped the default back. You can carry unless the property owner says no. So here’s the question: Should your carry permit work by default… Or should you have to ask permission at every single door? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks these laws are about “safety.” America HAT:

Hawaii tried to make your concealed carry permit basically worthless. You could have the permit. You could pass the process. You could legally carry. But the second you walked into a gas station, grocery store, restaurant, or parking lot on private property… Your gun became illegal unless the owner gave you permission first. That’s not a right. That’s a permission slip. The Supreme Court just struck it down 6–3. And this matters way beyond Hawaii. New York, New Jersey, Maryland, California — they’ve all been playing the same game: Give you the right on paper. Then make it illegal almost everywhere you’d actually use it. The Court just flipped the default back. You can carry unless the property owner says no. So here’s the question: Should your carry permit work by default… Or should you have to ask permission at every single door? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks these laws are about “safety.” America HAT:

Colion Noir

40,920 views • 1 month ago

🚨 EXTREMELY ALARMING: THE PHONE IS LISTENING EVEN WITH THE BATTERY OUT A high-level intelligence guy just admitted the truth on camera. “Even if you take the battery out… I can still hear you. I can still watch you.” They built secret circuits into the chips. These chips pull power straight from radio waves floating around you. No battery needed. The phone never really turns off. Your “dead” phone is still awake. Still recording. Still sending. Every private talk in your car. Every whisper in your bedroom. Every conversation you thought was safe. They can grab it. This isn’t some conspiracy theory. This is hardware-level spying baked into devices we all carry every single day. Most of those chips come from places that don’t exactly love us. We’ve been lied to for years. “Just remove the battery bro.” “Airplane mode is enough.” All bullshit. Your phone isn’t a phone anymore. It’s a 24/7 surveillance device you pay for and keep in your pocket. What else are they hiding in the tech we use? If they can listen with no battery, what are your smart TV, your watch, your car, and your kids tablets doing right now? When was the last time you had a conversation you know for 100% was private? How deep does the control actually go? Repost this if it hit you in the gut. Tag the friends who still think they’re free. The truth is out. SHARE THIS before they bury it.

🚨 EXTREMELY ALARMING: THE PHONE IS LISTENING EVEN WITH THE BATTERY OUT A high-level intelligence guy just admitted the truth on camera. “Even if you take the battery out… I can still hear you. I can still watch you.” They built secret circuits into the chips. These chips pull power straight from radio waves floating around you. No battery needed. The phone never really turns off. Your “dead” phone is still awake. Still recording. Still sending. Every private talk in your car. Every whisper in your bedroom. Every conversation you thought was safe. They can grab it. This isn’t some conspiracy theory. This is hardware-level spying baked into devices we all carry every single day. Most of those chips come from places that don’t exactly love us. We’ve been lied to for years. “Just remove the battery bro.” “Airplane mode is enough.” All bullshit. Your phone isn’t a phone anymore. It’s a 24/7 surveillance device you pay for and keep in your pocket. What else are they hiding in the tech we use? If they can listen with no battery, what are your smart TV, your watch, your car, and your kids tablets doing right now? When was the last time you had a conversation you know for 100% was private? How deep does the control actually go? Repost this if it hit you in the gut. Tag the friends who still think they’re free. The truth is out. SHARE THIS before they bury it.

Noah B. Price

21,446 views • 3 months ago

"All that stuff you've told ChatGPT could end up in Beijing." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) on what most people don't realize they've already given away. "Privacy means weirdos doing crime. That's what people say. Then ask them: can I see your Google searches? Your ChatGPT history? Your shopping cart? Your location? Suddenly: absolutely not." "You don't have privacy in any of those contexts. You've shared it with an untrusted third party. You've given those companies the keys to your life." "Google knows your daughter's pregnant before you do." "And these aren't American companies anymore. They get acquired, they get partnerships, they share data. Some company in Europe gets your info, sells it to the Middle East, who sells it to China." "How do you know in 20 or 30 years that what you disclosed today won't be used against you?" Translation: every search, every prompt, every location ping is permanent data being stored by entities you cannot vet. The Baath Party in 1981 thought public disclosure of membership was a status symbol. By 2003 it was a liability that ended careers. You don't know which of your current disclosures becomes the next liability.

"All that stuff you've told ChatGPT could end up in Beijing." Charles Hoskinson (Charles Hoskinson) on what most people don't realize they've already given away. "Privacy means weirdos doing crime. That's what people say. Then ask them: can I see your Google searches? Your ChatGPT history? Your shopping cart? Your location? Suddenly: absolutely not." "You don't have privacy in any of those contexts. You've shared it with an untrusted third party. You've given those companies the keys to your life." "Google knows your daughter's pregnant before you do." "And these aren't American companies anymore. They get acquired, they get partnerships, they share data. Some company in Europe gets your info, sells it to the Middle East, who sells it to China." "How do you know in 20 or 30 years that what you disclosed today won't be used against you?" Translation: every search, every prompt, every location ping is permanent data being stored by entities you cannot vet. The Baath Party in 1981 thought public disclosure of membership was a status symbol. By 2003 it was a liability that ended careers. You don't know which of your current disclosures becomes the next liability.

Michaël van de Poppe

40,136 views • 2 months ago

Half an hour into the most recent Joe Rogan podcast, Joe and Matthew McConaughey imagined AI that could deeply understand you, learn from your private data, and give proactive support without sacrificing your privacy. AI that could know your favorite books, your personal information, even your thought patterns, and return insights to help you understand yourself better. They spoke of this like a vision for the future, but at LedgerAI, that future already exists. AuraVision is our private AI platform that keeps your data where it belongs, with you. •Your data is stored locally, not in the cloud. •You can ingest AuraVision with exquisite data about yourself or your company: your strategies, workflows, knowledge, and goals. • In return, AuraVision provides actionable advice and intelligence, turning your private information into secure, personal insights. Whether you are a doctor, lawyer, government body, a financial institution, or even Joe Rogan or Matthew McConaughey, AuraVision makes AI adoption real, practical, and secure, accessed via our native token, $LEDGER. The difference is simple: while others are still imagining, we’re already building. Train by day, AuraVision by night, all day! We’ve left a link to the episode in the replies, leave your thoughts!

Half an hour into the most recent Joe Rogan podcast, Joe and Matthew McConaughey imagined AI that could deeply understand you, learn from your private data, and give proactive support without sacrificing your privacy. AI that could know your favorite books, your personal information, even your thought patterns, and return insights to help you understand yourself better. They spoke of this like a vision for the future, but at LedgerAI, that future already exists. AuraVision is our private AI platform that keeps your data where it belongs, with you. •Your data is stored locally, not in the cloud. •You can ingest AuraVision with exquisite data about yourself or your company: your strategies, workflows, knowledge, and goals. • In return, AuraVision provides actionable advice and intelligence, turning your private information into secure, personal insights. Whether you are a doctor, lawyer, government body, a financial institution, or even Joe Rogan or Matthew McConaughey, AuraVision makes AI adoption real, practical, and secure, accessed via our native token, $LEDGER. The difference is simple: while others are still imagining, we’re already building. Train by day, AuraVision by night, all day! We’ve left a link to the episode in the replies, leave your thoughts!

AuraVision

1,547,864 views • 11 months ago