Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

timelapse #85 (27.5 hrs): - currently cant rely on any other coding models except grok code fast 1 + grok 4 fast (for complex reasoning grok 4 fast is 20 cents for 1M tokens) - wrote qwen3-next trainer entirely from scratch to make it more managable - each piece...

283,820 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

In the latest Box AI Enterprise Evaluation, we tested xAI's Grok 4. We have seen how this new model moves beyond surface-level retrieval to tackle sophisticated business logic, perform precise calculations, make inferences based on qualitative patterns, and pinpoint critical contract clauses. 👉 Key Highlights: ↳ When analyzing company financial data, Grok 4 correctly performed multi-step tasks, followed sequential logic, and made accurate calculations to determine gross margins and performance comparisons. ↳ In reviewing information from text passages, Grok 4 showed advanced qualitative reasoning, comparing stylistic elements like tone, perspective, and vocabulary to correctly group passages and identify the number of authors. ↳ It excelled in extracting complex information from contracts, identifying detailed clauses like uncapped liability and profit sharing, as well as analyzing the implications of interdependent terms in agreements. 💡 Why It Matters: ↳ For Legal and Finance teams, Grok 4’s improved ability to handle calculations and interpret complex clauses makes it a powerful tool for in-depth contract review and financial analysis. ↳ For researchers, the model's advanced analytical capabilities can help deconstruct and synthesize information from dense technical papers. 👉 The Takeaway Overall, Grok 4 shows measurable advancement in sequential logic, numerical precision, and domain-specific language understanding. The model’s ability to blend quantitative and qualitative reasoning widens the range of workflows that can be automated inside Box.

Box

1,973,403 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Inspired by Grok as a developer and a heavy gamer for over 15 years, I spent some time last week building a few things. Thrilled to unveil my latest creation: an infinite runner game built almost entirely by Grok from xAI! This project showcases the incredible power of AI in game development. Grok handled everything—from designing the game mechanics to writing the code and even helping me debug issues along the way. I brought it to life using some amazing free assets from a treasure trove for indie developers. You can play the game now at Elon Musk, I’d be honored if you checked it out. AI is revolutionizing game development, and Grok is at the forefront with its outstanding capabilities. It’s more than a tool—it’s like a tireless co-developer. Grok grasps complex concepts, provides suggestions, and turns rough ideas into working code fast. For this infinite runner, it crafted smooth player controls, randomized obstacle generation, and an engaging scoring system, letting me focus on the overall vision. And cross_protocol, founded by Henry @CROSS is set to harness AI’s full potential in gaming, pushing the boundaries even further. This is just the beginning. With Grok’s help, I’m planning future projects: 1) Physics-based puzzle game where players tweak gravity and momentum to solve puzzles 2) 2D RPG with deep storytelling and branching dialogue 3) Fast-paced 3D shooter with immersive worlds Each genre requires unique skills, but Grok’s versatility makes it ideal for all of them. It adapts to any challenge—be it physics simulations, character AI, or level design—producing results that could rival a full dev team. AI like Grok is opening up creative doors I couldn’t tackle alone, and I can’t wait to see what’s next. Stay tuned for more.

J

99,726 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I got to try Grok 4.5 in early access in Cursor for the past few days and I absolutely enjoyed it. It feels like Opus 4.8 at 2x the speed at a much cheaper price point. I tasked it to brainstorm > plan > implement a big feature for my game (this act 1 boss fight) and it did not disappoint. - It is much smarter than Composer 2.5, during planning mode, it is able to think through my request more robustly, ensuring that edge cases are covered and makes sure to ask the right questions to confirm with me first. - It is much better at brainstorming ideas/suggestions, similar to Opus 4.8, though I think Fable still edges out a little when it comes to brainstorming ideas and suggestions - It is FAST. probably the fastest of all frontier models (Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5 etc), which makes it a joy to build with, because I can stay in the flow - It has much improved visual/animation capabilities than Composer 2.5, it can code up animations (i wanted an explosion animation with particle effects) with much, much better visuals, animation movement and timing. This is a big leap and I was so happy to see this improvement. - The best part for me is that I can just use the same model from planning down to execution without switching to a lower cost model because the price point is cheaper than other frontier models. I'll be testing this model with more challenging tasks in the next few days but I think this is going to be my main driver for vibe coding for a while. Also, its nice to see Grok back in the race. 🙌

Danny Limanseta

1,410,316 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Cerebras inference is very fast. So fast that it changes how we think about configuring our LLMs for voice agent use cases. Kimi K2.6 is a 1T parameter reasoning model that Cerebras serves at 650 - 1,000 tokens per second (end-to-end throughput), with time to first token metrics as low as 150ms (latency). These numbers are two to three times faster than other similarly capable models. The biggest lever we get from this kind of speed is that we can use the model in reasoning mode, and still have excellent "time to first non-thinking token." This solves a big pain point we have in 2026 for voice agent use cases. Almost all recent innovation in post-training has focused on making models good at reasoning ("test time compute"). This is great, but it makes the user-facing model latency much, much slower. Which is a problem for conversational voice agents. We can run Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned on, and get responses faster than other models produce with reasoning disabled. On my 30-turn voice agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 with reasoning enabled ties GPT 5.1 and Haiku 4.5 with reasoning disabled, and is still about 200ms seconds faster! On my primary task agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 is now the #2 model. It ranks just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash in "high" reasoning mode, and tied with GLM 5, Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.4 with reasoning set to "low." But Kimi K2.6 completes each turn in the agent loop in under 500ms. The other four models are all at least 3x slower. (Models only qualify for this benchmark if they can complete task turns at a P50 <4s.) A couple of other things that this speed buys us, for production voice agents: - Tool calls happen fast enough that we don't have to work around tool call latency in our pipeline design. - We can prompt the model to output structured data at the beginning of a response, followed by plain text for voice generation. This opens up possibilities like asking the model to do complex classification/generation tasks that influence the rest of the pipeline. For example, the model could create a detailed style prompt for a steerable TTS model, for each individual conversation turn. And, of course, you can use Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned off. Cerebras calls this "instant" mode. Here's a video of a Cerebras Kimi K2.6 voice agent with voice-to-voice response time, measured at the client, under 500ms. This is the true response latency as perceived by the user, including all network and audio codec overhead, transcription and turn detection, Kimi K2.6 token generation, and voice generation. 500ms is, effectively, instant. So the Cerebras naming for this mode is a propos. :-)

kwindla

40,319 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Seedance 2.0 vs. Seedance 2.0 Mini Actually, I tested this directly in Dreamina. It's already available on my account, but it seems Dreamina hasn't announced it on their social media yet 😆 Anyway, here are my first impressions. Basically, it's not bad... not bad at all. However, when I tested it with something more action-oriented, the difference was huge. It depends on your goal, but I don't think I'll use Seedance 2.0 Mini for action-heavy prompts. I could be wrong though, and I need to do more testing. For something that looks simpler and more natural, Seedance 2.0 Mini is surprisingly good. You can still notice some glitches or artifacts from time to time, but overall it's pretty decent. It's definitely not worse than the current version of Grok Imagine Video 😂😂In fact, this is what Grok Imagine should be. They're almost there but Instead, they're going backwards. I think only Tetsuo and Freeze keep saying Grok Imagine is the best model in the world LMAO 🤣🤣🤣 Still, I think Seedance 2.0 Mini delivers exactly what it promises. It's cheaper, faster, although it comes with a slight sacrifice in quality (well obviously it's a mini version of it), although not as much as I expected based on my initial tests. I think in the end, you need to identify your needs and decide when to use Mini, when to use Fast, and when to use the full version. At this stage, I can't say much yet, but I'll keep exploring it further. Meanwhile, check out the video comparison I made here.

DAN · MXVDXN

30,516 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat