Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

TJR explains why Solana memecoin traders would dominate futures trading “Not only is your risk tolerance way higher than it already needs to be to beat the futures market but on top of that, you guys have already beat the psychological game that is so difficult to overcome when... it comes to trading” “If they took their talents over to the futures market, it would be consistent gains that are no longer dependent on these mini market cap fluctuations” “They would be able to make way more money because they've already beat the psychological game” “I think they could transform into profitable futures traders within like a three to four month span, if not even less”show more

Jack

44,791 subscribers

432,215 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

there is a reason why coins on BASE and BNB run WAY harder than they would on Solana, and it comes down to the culture and the way people trade "on Base and BNB traders will hold longer than people usually do on Solana. on SOL everyone is wired to only buying $10K marketcap coins and there are less people who want to bid coins over $100K on SOL than there are on Base and BNB" if you're trading the memecoin market, join Kanto Labs

there is a reason why coins on BASE and BNB run WAY harder than they would on Solana, and it comes down to the culture and the way people trade "on Base and BNB traders will hold longer than people usually do on Solana. on SOL everyone is wired to only buying $10K marketcap coins and there are less people who want to bid coins over $100K on SOL than there are on Base and BNB" if you're trading the memecoin market, join Kanto Labs

Ash Robin

58,160 views • 7 months ago

Asmongold reveals the only way to beat left wing propaganda "The way you counter signal this is not by even explaining what actually happened. It's by saying that if this is what happened, it's a good thing. Because that's the only way you can beat these people." "You can't beat them by trying to reason because they didn't reason themselves into these positions. The way you actually beat them is by saying yes, this is what's happening and it's good. I like it. I hope they do it more." "If you're fighting them on the foundation of this being problematic, you've already lost the game because they've decided the ethics and morality of the conversation. I reject that completely."

Asmongold reveals the only way to beat left wing propaganda "The way you counter signal this is not by even explaining what actually happened. It's by saying that if this is what happened, it's a good thing. Because that's the only way you can beat these people." "You can't beat them by trying to reason because they didn't reason themselves into these positions. The way you actually beat them is by saying yes, this is what's happening and it's good. I like it. I hope they do it more." "If you're fighting them on the foundation of this being problematic, you've already lost the game because they've decided the ethics and morality of the conversation. I reject that completely."

Asmongold Updates

27,602 views • 1 month ago

I believe most people trading alts to get more #bitcoin aren’t gaining as much as they think they are. In general, I think traders would do better if they allocated their energy into producing a good or service, and then swept their surplus into #bitcoin If you’re capable of successfully trading you are quite intelligent. Is it possible you would be more deeply satisfied if that energy went into creating something more valuable? Could this make you feel more fulfilled and abundant? Could this cause you to manifest more money? To then stack more sats? To me this formula is the way to get the absolute most satisfaction and the most money out of life.

I believe most people trading alts to get more #bitcoin aren’t gaining as much as they think they are. In general, I think traders would do better if they allocated their energy into producing a good or service, and then swept their surplus into #bitcoin If you’re capable of successfully trading you are quite intelligent. Is it possible you would be more deeply satisfied if that energy went into creating something more valuable? Could this make you feel more fulfilled and abundant? Could this cause you to manifest more money? To then stack more sats? To me this formula is the way to get the absolute most satisfaction and the most money out of life.

Eric V Stacks

22,231 views • 2 years ago

One of the main reasons why traders blow up accounts and cannot learn from their mistakes to be successful at it. Only 3/10 traders make it in trading and these emotions are the main reason. It is not market manipulation. It is not the overnight news. It is rather the risk management that is associated and toed to their emotions. #tranding #trader #psychology #optionstrading #tradeideaoftheweek

One of the main reasons why traders blow up accounts and cannot learn from their mistakes to be successful at it. Only 3/10 traders make it in trading and these emotions are the main reason. It is not market manipulation. It is not the overnight news. It is rather the risk management that is associated and toed to their emotions. #tranding #trader #psychology #optionstrading #tradeideaoftheweek

ProblemSniper

12,476 views • 6 months ago

This money expert says there are no short-term traders consistently outperforming the market over a period of 5+ years. ''It is so rare that anyone can outperform the market. It just doesn't happen.'' ''People that say they swing trade the S&P500 Futures and consistently outperform the market, please go raise a hedge fund because you will be a billionaire.'' ''FOREX is an efficient market, man. Smartest people in the world who's entire job is to outperform the markets, and a basket of hedge funds did not outperform the S&P500 Index.''

This money expert says there are no short-term traders consistently outperforming the market over a period of 5+ years. ''It is so rare that anyone can outperform the market. It just doesn't happen.'' ''People that say they swing trade the S&P500 Futures and consistently outperform the market, please go raise a hedge fund because you will be a billionaire.'' ''FOREX is an efficient market, man. Smartest people in the world who's entire job is to outperform the markets, and a basket of hedge funds did not outperform the S&P500 Index.''

The Honest Trader

40,393 views • 4 months ago

TJR SAYS options trading “makes no sense” and explains why he thinks it’s WORSE than futures 😳📉 “Options have the Greeks, there’s theta decay. So if you’re in a trade for five minutes versus fifteen minutes and price hits the exact same target… you make less money just because it took longer.” “Why would you trade something where you need it to hit in a certain time window just to get your full risk-reward? And if it takes three times as long to reach the same objective, you just make less money?” “I genuinely don’t know why people trade options. You’re trading the same assets, stocks, indexes, there’s no difference. So why add the extra problem?”

TJR SAYS options trading “makes no sense” and explains why he thinks it’s WORSE than futures 😳📉 “Options have the Greeks, there’s theta decay. So if you’re in a trade for five minutes versus fifteen minutes and price hits the exact same target… you make less money just because it took longer.” “Why would you trade something where you need it to hit in a certain time window just to get your full risk-reward? And if it takes three times as long to reach the same objective, you just make less money?” “I genuinely don’t know why people trade options. You’re trading the same assets, stocks, indexes, there’s no difference. So why add the extra problem?”

Hiastra

205,837 views • 6 months ago

Professional trader Tom Hougaard on the single biggest psychological mistake that ruins most traders: He explains that the hardest part of trading isn't technical, it's psychological. It requires you to think in a way that directly contradicts how you operate in everyday life. In real life, we are trained to hunt for bargains. We compare prices at the supermarket and naturally gravitate towards whatever is cheaper. But Hougaard warns that applying this same instinct to markets is exactly what destroys most traders. TraderTom puts it simply: "You cannot be afraid of buying something that has already moved up significantly or you shouldn't be afraid of selling something that has already moved down significantly. And that's where the vast majority of people go wrong." The problem, according to Hougaard, is that markets don't operate the way shoppers think: "But the market doesn't operate with these principles of cheap or expensive. The market just has the prevailing price." He explains why this is so difficult for people to internalise: "Psychologically it's very difficult for us to accept because we are so brainwashed that we go to the supermarket and we see Pepsi Cola costs X but Coca-Cola is half price to Pepsi. So we all gravitate towards Coca-Cola because it's cheaper. But cheap in the market is a market that is going down. We don't want to buy that. We want to sell it short." Hougaard sums up the core challenge of trading: "The whole balance of being one person in real life and being another person in the market, that's what makes trading so incredibly difficult."

Professional trader Tom Hougaard on the single biggest psychological mistake that ruins most traders: He explains that the hardest part of trading isn't technical, it's psychological. It requires you to think in a way that directly contradicts how you operate in everyday life. In real life, we are trained to hunt for bargains. We compare prices at the supermarket and naturally gravitate towards whatever is cheaper. But Hougaard warns that applying this same instinct to markets is exactly what destroys most traders. TraderTom puts it simply: "You cannot be afraid of buying something that has already moved up significantly or you shouldn't be afraid of selling something that has already moved down significantly. And that's where the vast majority of people go wrong." The problem, according to Hougaard, is that markets don't operate the way shoppers think: "But the market doesn't operate with these principles of cheap or expensive. The market just has the prevailing price." He explains why this is so difficult for people to internalise: "Psychologically it's very difficult for us to accept because we are so brainwashed that we go to the supermarket and we see Pepsi Cola costs X but Coca-Cola is half price to Pepsi. So we all gravitate towards Coca-Cola because it's cheaper. But cheap in the market is a market that is going down. We don't want to buy that. We want to sell it short." Hougaard sums up the core challenge of trading: "The whole balance of being one person in real life and being another person in the market, that's what makes trading so incredibly difficult."

Big Brain Business

40,823 views • 4 months ago

. Tarek Mansour explains why Kalshi is launching the first regulated perps in the US - and why the offshore market already proved it would work "The offshore market is very good validation for that. You look at the size of the offshore market and how liquid it's been." "There's no first principle reason for why the US should be different." "Futures were designed with an expiry in mind because when futures started, it was with underlying that had expiry. There was a natural delivery." Podcast out this Monday!

. Tarek Mansour explains why Kalshi is launching the first regulated perps in the US - and why the offshore market already proved it would work "The offshore market is very good validation for that. You look at the size of the offshore market and how liquid it's been." "There's no first principle reason for why the US should be different." "Futures were designed with an expiry in mind because when futures started, it was with underlying that had expiry. There was a natural delivery." Podcast out this Monday!

MR SHIFT 🦁

28,935 views • 3 months ago

I probably talked about this before but the way Oda is going about black blades I think is much better and makes much sense than just handing them out to top tiers. The thing is, there is already a metric in place to make the connection. To give Mihawk a seat at that table. The fact that Yoru is a supreme grade weapon like Ace and Murakumogiri. Supreme grades are already more rare than conqueror's haki as it stands. Now if Xebec and Roger had black blades as well then there's no real way to make that distinction for Oda or to be able to make the argument that Mihawk has gone beyond what they were capable of. We would see these guys continue to get the benefit of the doubt, because even though they would be black blade users alongside Mihawk, they would still be seen as his superiors because of the era they lived in and who they shared the seas with. But the black blade the way Oda wrote it, lets us have a different conversation because it transcends eras.

I probably talked about this before but the way Oda is going about black blades I think is much better and makes much sense than just handing them out to top tiers. The thing is, there is already a metric in place to make the connection. To give Mihawk a seat at that table. The fact that Yoru is a supreme grade weapon like Ace and Murakumogiri. Supreme grades are already more rare than conqueror's haki as it stands. Now if Xebec and Roger had black blades as well then there's no real way to make that distinction for Oda or to be able to make the argument that Mihawk has gone beyond what they were capable of. We would see these guys continue to get the benefit of the doubt, because even though they would be black blade users alongside Mihawk, they would still be seen as his superiors because of the era they lived in and who they shared the seas with. But the black blade the way Oda wrote it, lets us have a different conversation because it transcends eras.

Dark King🌑👑🇵🇸

28,926 views • 10 months ago

This is some of my favorite advice from Jamie Dimon on how to build a successful career From his commencement speech to the HBS MBA Class of 2009 "There is already a book on you. That book is already being written. And if I spoke to your teachers, your friends, your parents, I would know whether you are trusted, how hard you work, and whether you are ethical I would know so much about you that you would be shocked. I dont even have to meet you So that book is already growing. You write the book the way you want it to be written. You actually have that choice. Do not let others write it."

This is some of my favorite advice from Jamie Dimon on how to build a successful career From his commencement speech to the HBS MBA Class of 2009 "There is already a book on you. That book is already being written. And if I spoke to your teachers, your friends, your parents, I would know whether you are trusted, how hard you work, and whether you are ethical I would know so much about you that you would be shocked. I dont even have to meet you So that book is already growing. You write the book the way you want it to be written. You actually have that choice. Do not let others write it."

Boring_Business

339,342 views • 8 months ago

Khosla Ventures' Keith Rabois explains how a mere blip in the Anthropic or OpenAI IPOs would be catastrophic for the venture-funded AI ecosystem: "The most devastating thing to the frothy hype, traction, and funding of AI from VCs would be if Anthropic or OpenAI has a blip in their IPOs." "Do they have to show metrics over the next month to first few quarters that cause people to value either company less than the current belief that they will trade in the trillions? They could have a miss on revenue traction, a miss on margins, something like that." "That would be catastrophic. It would immediately reset virtually all the valuations in the AI world. And probably deprive half the companies that are raising money from access to capital." "I'm not saying that is going to happen, or is likely. And I think if they miss, it would be more on the margin side than on the revenue side." "But if they do, everybody is predicating their new investments in dollars on the idea that you can build a trillion-dollar company within the lifecycle of a venture fund. There are 2 examples, currently, and there are several companies that people believe have the potential to get there." "If that changes, and you cannot predict that more trillion-dollar companies can be created, then the valuations that people are investing at, and the dollars that are being invested, do not make that much sense."

Khosla Ventures' Keith Rabois explains how a mere blip in the Anthropic or OpenAI IPOs would be catastrophic for the venture-funded AI ecosystem: "The most devastating thing to the frothy hype, traction, and funding of AI from VCs would be if Anthropic or OpenAI has a blip in their IPOs." "Do they have to show metrics over the next month to first few quarters that cause people to value either company less than the current belief that they will trade in the trillions? They could have a miss on revenue traction, a miss on margins, something like that." "That would be catastrophic. It would immediately reset virtually all the valuations in the AI world. And probably deprive half the companies that are raising money from access to capital." "I'm not saying that is going to happen, or is likely. And I think if they miss, it would be more on the margin side than on the revenue side." "But if they do, everybody is predicating their new investments in dollars on the idea that you can build a trillion-dollar company within the lifecycle of a venture fund. There are 2 examples, currently, and there are several companies that people believe have the potential to get there." "If that changes, and you cannot predict that more trillion-dollar companies can be created, then the valuations that people are investing at, and the dollars that are being invested, do not make that much sense."

TBPN

78,606 views • 12 days ago

Offchain Labs CEO Steven Goldfeder on why Robinhood chose Arbitrum over Solana "Yeah, and by the way, that exactly is the point. You're in two buckets: you're Ethereum layer one, you're your own layer one, you're Ethereum layer two. If they would have put their products on Solana, think about it. Robinhood is attracting millions of dollars in daily transaction volume today. Where would those dollars have gone had they built on Solana? They would have gone to Solana validators." "I think Vlad said it the best he said, 'I want to be a landlord, not a tenant.' Today, they're driving Robinhood Chain, they're driving Robinhood Wallet. That wouldn't happen if they launched on Ethereum layer one. It wouldn't happen if they launched on Solana. They'd basically be contributing to the success of Solana validators, contributing to the success of the popular Solana wallets like Phantom." "But today they're actually able to own the ecosystem and be the landlord here. They're generating not only the revenue from their direct products, but also from all the others that want to be co-located with Robinhood." "There's a strip mall and you have a very popular store that a lot of people are coming to. everyone in the strip mall benefits from that. But if you don't own the strip mall, you don't really benefit from that at all."

Offchain Labs CEO Steven Goldfeder on why Robinhood chose Arbitrum over Solana "Yeah, and by the way, that exactly is the point. You're in two buckets: you're Ethereum layer one, you're your own layer one, you're Ethereum layer two. If they would have put their products on Solana, think about it. Robinhood is attracting millions of dollars in daily transaction volume today. Where would those dollars have gone had they built on Solana? They would have gone to Solana validators." "I think Vlad said it the best he said, 'I want to be a landlord, not a tenant.' Today, they're driving Robinhood Chain, they're driving Robinhood Wallet. That wouldn't happen if they launched on Ethereum layer one. It wouldn't happen if they launched on Solana. They'd basically be contributing to the success of Solana validators, contributing to the success of the popular Solana wallets like Phantom." "But today they're actually able to own the ecosystem and be the landlord here. They're generating not only the revenue from their direct products, but also from all the others that want to be co-located with Robinhood." "There's a strip mall and you have a very popular store that a lot of people are coming to. everyone in the strip mall benefits from that. But if you don't own the strip mall, you don't really benefit from that at all."

The Wolf Of All Streets

48,474 views • 17 days ago

So why did they pretend to be visitors? Why weren’t they already there if it’s her house? Did they make the children pretend to not know too? Coz that would be so sick of them #UthandoNesthembu

So why did they pretend to be visitors? Why weren’t they already there if it’s her house? Did they make the children pretend to not know too? Coz that would be so sick of them #UthandoNesthembu

zeek

168,673 views • 4 months ago

I think actually the plane that I flew on was at GREATER RISK — Trump on why they switched out QATAR PLANE ‘Because that would be the PLANE, I think that they would be MORE LIKELY to go for it’

I think actually the plane that I flew on was at GREATER RISK — Trump on why they switched out QATAR PLANE ‘Because that would be the PLANE, I think that they would be MORE LIKELY to go for it’

RT

83,300 views • 1 month ago

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

Sen. Paul: "If you would spend an hour and go to the SCIF…and just tell both the ranking member and the other, it would be private and won't be revealed. I think it would get this over with and we wouldn't have a complaint about going ahead with the vote tomorrow." Mullin: "I have no issue with that. If you guys get cleared on it, because the way my understanding was that there's only 4 people read in it." Paul: "That would be on you. We're not gonna try to figure out who the four people are and whether we can be of approval to it." Mullin: "I don't have the authority to do that."

The Bulwark

25,818 views • 6 months ago

Min Heejin: It says in the article that they contacted ADOR. So, I don’t understand why the kids have to be treated like that, why they’re being divided like this. Let’s just say the two people revealed first that they wanted to return to the company. Even so, I think someone like me would have waited. They could have contacted the other members, because it’s better to announce everything at once. That way, the fandom doesn’t get confused, and people don’t get unnecessarily stressed. But why make it worse like this, why create confusion? And if the three people clearly expressed their intention to return, that should be accepted. Why suspect them, why try to question their true intentions? If the court ruled that way, and if they want to follow the court’s decision properly, they shouldn’t question intentions—they should just do it. That’s the way not to harass them.

Min Heejin: It says in the article that they contacted ADOR. So, I don’t understand why the kids have to be treated like that, why they’re being divided like this. Let’s just say the two people revealed first that they wanted to return to the company. Even so, I think someone like me would have waited. They could have contacted the other members, because it’s better to announce everything at once. That way, the fandom doesn’t get confused, and people don’t get unnecessarily stressed. But why make it worse like this, why create confusion? And if the three people clearly expressed their intention to return, that should be accepted. Why suspect them, why try to question their true intentions? If the court ruled that way, and if they want to follow the court’s decision properly, they shouldn’t question intentions—they should just do it. That’s the way not to harass them.

.

513,278 views • 9 months ago