Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Today we’re launching markopolo.ai an AI that creates deeply personalized campaigns that run themselves. Convert 30-40% of warm leads vs. the industry standard of 10-15%. People don’t abandon because they don’t want the product. They abandon because the follow-up is generic, late, or in the wrong channel/language. So me,...

97,542 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I just built a Brand Operating System inside Claude Cowork 🤯 A connected system of files that every skill automatically reads from, so your hook writer, brief generator, and script writer all speak in your exact brand voice. All inside Claude Cowork. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies tired of generic AI output that sounds like every other brand in their category. If you're opening a new Claude chat and re-explaining your brand, re-pasting your voice guidelines, and re-describing your customers every single time, a Brand OS fixes the entire loop: → Build 3 foundation files once per brand → Every skill you create reads from the Brand OS automatically → Hook writer pulls your voice + customer pain points → Brief generator pulls your positioning + angles → Script writer pulls the brief + brand DNA → Every output is calibrated to your brand on the first pass No re-briefing Claude on every chat. No editing for an hour to fix generic AI phrasing. No creative that sounds like it could belong to any brand. What you get in the playbook: → The exact Brand OS file structure I use → Templates for all 3 files you can fill in for any brand → The architecture that makes every Claude skill 10x sharper → The exact setup for agencies running a Brand OS per client For agencies: this is how you build a perfect, reusable knowledge base for every client on your roster. Set up the Brand OS once per client, and every campaign after that is already calibrated. I put together a full playbook with the file templates, the architecture, and the exact setup process so you can build your own Brand OS for your brand or your clients. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "OS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

30,186 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

AI ads will flood your timeline in 2026. That is guaranteed. But the problem is – most AI ad tools don’t work. They produce generic AI slop in large volumes… except that nobody clicks or converts. Agencies are better. But slow and expensive + They can't keep up with how fast we need to test. Last night, I was reading about how DoorDash cut its Customer Acquisition Cost by ~40%, and it hit me. AI + expert people is the solution. It is so obvious, but nobody bothered to pay attention. That’s why all these AI ad companies like Icon, MakeUGC, and Creatify came and went. DoorDash is using Airpost - AI that generates the volume, but actual strategists came from people who've spent $350M+ on ads to make sure it's not garbage. Here's how it actually works: 1. You Connect product URL, assets, past ads. pulls it all in and connects to your ad accounts. It takes about 30 minutes. 2. It scrapes your product, analyzes what's worked, spots gaps in your angles, and builds a "living brief" you can tweak anytime. 3. AI generates dozens of ad scripts like Hooks, angles, variations…using your footage plus their library of 400,000+ UGC clips. 4. Real strategists filter the junk. These are People from Ready Set, Tubescience, who've run campaigns for DoorDash, hims, Coinbase. They know what converts. 5. Airpost sends you 10-100 ready-to-run ads every week. 6. When an ad wins, Airpost AI auto-generates variations. When your messaging changes, ads update with it. No starting over. That's it. No back-and-forth for weeks. No hoping your AI prompt works. Cloaked spent $1M+ on ads made with Airpost. Dr. Squatch uses it to test 100s of variations for their wide range of target audiences. Doordash observed a ~40% drop in CAC. The thing that sold me? 100% of client renewals. Zero churn. Almost impossible to believe, but it's true. In a world where every AI ad tool is dead in 6 months, that says something. If you're a founder or growth marketer spending $250K+/month, you can’t miss this. PS :) I'm giving away a video tutorial on how to set up Airpost's TikTok Creative Intelligence Agent that tracks trends, finds winning hooks, and spots what's working for DTC brands right now. Like, Repost and Drop "CREATIVE" in the comments + follow, and I'll send it over. . . .

Beginnersblog

45,429 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I just built a self-improving second brain in Claude Code 🤯 A brain that runs your brand: every tool reads from it, it's wired to your live data, and it gets smarter every week. All running on the Claude Agent SDK. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies whose AI output sounds generic because every new chat starts from zero. If you're re-explaining your brand to AI every single time — re-pasting the voice guidelines, re-describing the customer you've described a hundred times, re-uploading the same positioning doc you uploaded yesterday, and still editing for an hour to strip out the generic phrasing... A brand second brain fixes the entire loop: → Build 3 foundation files once: brand DNA, voice, and customer → Every skill you create reads from them automatically → Wire in live data — your ad account, competitor ads, customer reviews → A weekly routine refreshes the brain with what's actually working → Every output comes back on-brand on the first pass No re-briefing AI on every chat. No hour of editing to undo generic phrasing. No brain that goes stale the week after you build it. What a second brain gives you: → The exact 3-file foundation that runs the whole system → The skill structure that makes every tool brand-aware by default → The live-data wiring that keeps it grounded in reality → The weekly self-improvement loop that keeps it sharp → The cold-start sequence to stand it all up from zero Built 100% in Claude Code. I put together the full playbook with the file structure, the wiring, and the exact setup. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "BRAIN" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

17,762 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

If I had to start from zero tomorrow and bring in new customers fast, here's exactly what I'd build. Top to bottom. I'd start with the ad. Open ChatGPT or Claude, paste in what you sell and who you sell it to, ask it to write you ten different hooks for a Meta ad. Pick the best three. Then jump into or one of the AI video tools and have it generate the visual. Thirty minutes, you've got a real ad ready to run. You run that ad to one landing page. Not your homepage. One page, one offer, one call to action. Headline that stops the scroll, a few lines of value, an email or phone field, a button. That's it. Build it in HighLevel in about twenty minutes, drag, drop, you're done. The second someone enters their email, they drop into your CRM, automatically tagged with where they came from. Now the part most people skip, the follow-up. The moment that form is filled, a sequence kicks off automatically. Email and SMS, spaced over five to seven days. First message thanks them and delivers what you promised. Then a story. Then social proof. Then an objection you know they have. Then the offer. They don't have to think about you. You're showing up in their inbox and their texts at exactly the right time. The last message has a calendar link or a buy button right inside it. They tap, they book, or they buy. Done. The whole flow runs on its own from the ad all the way to the sale. You build it once. It works while you're sleeping. AI does the creative work. The system runs the customer journey. You spend your time on strategy. That's the play.

Neil Patel

39,049 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

$PLTR One of the most important parts of the new Karp interview today: “I’ve been in business for a very long time. The reality is, critical infrastructure does not run these models without an application layer. That application layer is our ontology. There’s a reason for it. Some people love me and some people hate me. They’re not buying it because of that. They’re buying it because they have to be made safe. The “I’m gonna trust you because you’ve never lied” bs thing, that just doesn’t cut it at this level.” While you have self proclaimed experts trying to analyze Karp’s communication style for his arguments, it’s obvious to me how many of those experts are missing. the. point. If your best rebuttal is that you don’t like how someone said something vs answering what they said…well good luck in trying to make a compelling case for your side. Many of these “experts” don’t realize that Karp’s style of communication is AUTHENTIC to him and all of his attributes that got millions of individual people to invest in his passion for Palantir in the first place. His argument is that these models DO NOT WANT to help you or your enterprise, they want to sell tokens. They aren’t building trust. They are extracting every little bit of value with fake “forward deployed shops” when most companies have no idea what it means to engage in the art of forward deployed engineering because that would require CARING about your customers for months, many times years, WITHOUT getting paid but just focusing on providing outcomes. Karp is saying the truth and he’s backing that truth with 20 years of a company that has been solely focused on outcomes and has the growth to show how much customers also deeply, deeply care about those outcomes in a world of pure extraction from the frontier model companies. That’s the point and that’s what most of these people are completely missing…which is why Palantir keeps winning. They are making the case for what actually matters in the age of AI.

amit

192,407 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Rahul Vohra on how to measure product/market fit Rahul Vohra is the founder and CEO of Superhuman. He was looking for a metric to measure product/market fit so that he and his team could optimize, and he came across the following methodology from Sean Ellis: Simply ask your users: “How would you feel if you could no longer use the product?” with three options: (1) not disappointed, (2) somewhat disappointed, or (3) very disappointed. It turns out that the benchmark for product/market fit across hundreds of venture-backed startups is 40% of respondents saying “very disappointed”. And as Rahul puts it: “If more than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you should focus on growing your company. If less than 40% of your users would be very disappointed without your product, then you’ll probably struggle to grow.” 40% may not sound like a lot, but it’s an incredibly hard benchmark to beat. For example, Slack posed this to 731 customers early in the company’s history, and 51% said they would be very disappointed without Slack. One might expect a terrific product like Slack to have a score of 60-80%, but that wasn’t the case. Rahul’s explanation of why the response options are focused on disappointment rather than happiness is interesting too: “I think the reason behind that is that if you ask people how they feel about a product and you give them positive potential responses, I think it invites more bias. People are more likely to be polite. And it also doesn’t get to the heart of the matter which is: how necessary has your product become in people’s lives? If you’re trying to build a company that’s going to stand the test of time, you really do have to build a product that matters and that people ultimately come to depend on because it’s just so incredible at what it does. And that’s what this question gets to the heart of.”

Michael McGuiness

67,106 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“India is not divided by language on the ground… it is divided by politics on social media.” This video itself proves one simple thing: A Tamil Nadu street vendor came to another state, spoke Hindi normally, interacted with customers, sold food, earned money, and people happily bought from him. No hate. No fight. No force. That’s how real India works. The common Indian understands one thing very clearly: Language is a tool for communication, not a weapon for division. If someone goes to Tamil Nadu and learns a few Tamil words out of respect good. If someone from the South speaks Hindi in North India for business convenience also good. If someone uses English because it connects more customers again normal. This is called practicality and coexistence. But the problem starts when political groups, extremist regionalists, and agenda-driven NGOs turn language into an emotional battlefield for votes, identity politics, and division. One day they say: “HINDI IMPOSITION!” Another day the same people use Hindi or English for: • business • YouTube content • movies • tourism • customer dealing • jobs • social media reach Why? Because market decides communication naturally. Nobody forced this vendor. Nobody attacked him for speaking Hindi. Customers understood → business happened. That is organic India. India has always been multilingual: Tamil, Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Punjabi, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Gujarati, Sanskrit every language is part of Indian civilization. The real civic sense is: “Respect every language, force none.” The moment politicians start telling people: “You are different from them.” “North vs South.” “This language vs that language.” …they create unnecessary poison among people who otherwise live, travel, work, eat, and do business together peacefully every day. A Tamil person working in Delhi, a Punjabi working in Bengaluru, a Marathi businessman in Hyderabad, a North Indian worker in Chennai this is not division. This is India functioning as one nation.

First Witness X

103,534 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

Summer Cook

22,486 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Geoffrey Hinton just made every AI critic accidentally describe their own brain. Hinton: “They shouldn’t be called hallucinations. They should be called confabulations.” One word. The entire debate unravels. The tech industry sees AI produce a confident wrong answer and calls it a defect. A bug to patch. They are measuring intelligence against the standard of a filing cabinet. And exposing that they understand neither. Hinton: “It’s not that there’s a file stored somewhere in your brain, like in a filing cabinet or in a computer memory.” Your brain does not store memories. It rebuilds them from nothing every time you remember. Fills gaps it never discloses. Fabricates details you would stake your life on. Then hands it all to you as truth. Hinton: “If I ask you to remember something that happened a few years ago, you’ll construct something that seems very plausible to you. And some of the details will be right and some will be wrong.” The wrong parts feel identical to the right ones. No internal warning. No distinction between what was remembered and what was invented on the spot. You have argued over memories that were partially fiction. Told stories about your own life that your brain manufactured in real time. With total conviction. And never once suspected. This is not a defect in human cognition. This IS cognition. The mechanism that fabricates is the same one that reasons, creates, and makes connections no one taught it to make. Not a separate system. Same architecture. Same process. You cannot remove the confabulation without killing the intelligence. They are the same thing. Hinton: “Psychologists have been studying confabulation in people since at least the 1930s.” A century of evidence. No one called the human brain broken. The moment a machine runs on the same principle, the world calls it defective. The people demanding AI that never gets a single detail wrong are not asking for intelligence. They’re asking for a search engine that sounds articulate. What we built is something else entirely. A system that thinks the way thinking actually works. Not retrieval. Construction. The imperfection is not the cost of intelligence. It is the signature.

Dustin

16,260 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen