Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Two days ago… I wrote this. The protest would end. The investigation would begin. Check this Video… Inside a police vehicle. A dashboard. Faces. Photographs. Information. One thing should be obvious. Silence of Authorities… Should never be mistaken for inaction. When you think the Government is quiet... It is...

md_deepesh's profile picture

Dr. Deepessh Divaakaran (Dr. DD)

17,286 subscribers

12,914 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

You know why crime in India keeps finding room to grow? Because for many offenders, the fear of law is disappearing. Look at this reel allegedly posted by an accused while under police custody, handcuffed and travelling in a police vehicle. Instead of feeling the weight of the law, he appears comfortable enough to record content for social media. If this video is genuine, it raises serious questions: > How did a person in custody access a phone? > Why was filming allowed inside a police vehicle? > Were custodial protocols being followed? > What message does this send to victims and the public? The criminal justice system is not just about punishment… it is also about deterrence. When accused individuals can project an image of confidence, influence, or even celebrity status from custody, the deterrent effect of law is weakened. Crime rises not only because criminals exist, but because accountability appears uncertain. The rule of law must not only be enforced; it must be seen to be enforced. If this video is authentic, the authorities should investigate how it happened and fix the loopholes immediately.
0:25

You know why crime in India keeps finding room to grow? Because for many offenders, the fear of law is disappearing. Look at this reel allegedly posted by an accused while under police custody, handcuffed and travelling in a police vehicle. Instead of feeling the weight of the law, he appears comfortable enough to record content for social media. If this video is genuine, it raises serious questions: > How did a person in custody access a phone? > Why was filming allowed inside a police vehicle? > Were custodial protocols being followed? > What message does this send to victims and the public? The criminal justice system is not just about punishment… it is also about deterrence. When accused individuals can project an image of confidence, influence, or even celebrity status from custody, the deterrent effect of law is weakened. Crime rises not only because criminals exist, but because accountability appears uncertain. The rule of law must not only be enforced; it must be seen to be enforced. If this video is authentic, the authorities should investigate how it happened and fix the loopholes immediately.

Divya Gandotra Tandon

13,599 views • 2 months ago

1,600 CCTV video clips were erased to loot the deity's treasury and this is what they want to divert your attention from. This is not merely a theft. It is a systematic conspiracy. In a place where millions of devotees offer donations with deep reverence, those on the inside are wiping out camera footage and making evidence vanish to empty the treasury. And yet, there is loud posturing about "protecting the faith." If an ordinary person commits even a petty theft, the entire system comes down on them. But when a temple treasury is looted and CCTV footage disappears, a deafening silence follows. This is the very "culture" that is claimed to be protected every single day.
0:42

1,600 CCTV video clips were erased to loot the deity's treasury and this is what they want to divert your attention from. This is not merely a theft. It is a systematic conspiracy. In a place where millions of devotees offer donations with deep reverence, those on the inside are wiping out camera footage and making evidence vanish to empty the treasury. And yet, there is loud posturing about "protecting the faith." If an ordinary person commits even a petty theft, the entire system comes down on them. But when a temple treasury is looted and CCTV footage disappears, a deafening silence follows. This is the very "culture" that is claimed to be protected every single day.

Pragnya Gupta

22,295 views • 1 month ago

💬: What raises suspicion of surveillance is this: in Dani’s case, it was said that her side had already received a formal legal notice two weeks earlier. The notice basically stated that if certain matters were not explained, the contract would be terminated. What’s most shocking is that, according to reports, one of the main issues raised was why a parent had replaced a phone after losing it. The implication seemed to be that the parent changed the phone in order to destroy evidence that might have been on it. You can sit there and spin your own baseless theories like that if you want, but if the phone hadn’t been replaced, were you planning to demand it and run forensic analysis on it? Even if you asked for the phone, just like President Lee Jae-myung has said before, you are not an investigative authority or a law enforcement agency. You have no right to demand a phone, especially a parent’s phone. When I heard this from a tip-off, I honestly found it terrifying.
0:26

💬: What raises suspicion of surveillance is this: in Dani’s case, it was said that her side had already received a formal legal notice two weeks earlier. The notice basically stated that if certain matters were not explained, the contract would be terminated. What’s most shocking is that, according to reports, one of the main issues raised was why a parent had replaced a phone after losing it. The implication seemed to be that the parent changed the phone in order to destroy evidence that might have been on it. You can sit there and spin your own baseless theories like that if you want, but if the phone hadn’t been replaced, were you planning to demand it and run forensic analysis on it? Even if you asked for the phone, just like President Lee Jae-myung has said before, you are not an investigative authority or a law enforcement agency. You have no right to demand a phone, especially a parent’s phone. When I heard this from a tip-off, I honestly found it terrifying.

1tokki

293,847 views • 8 months ago

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.
6:16

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 views • 3 months ago

BOOM: Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calls out Brian Tyler Cohen and Geoff Duncan for implying Donald Trump was a co-conspirator in Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes... "What crime did Trump commit as it relates directly to Epstein? Because you're mentioning that he's in the files with the implication, of course, that a crime was committed. And yet, for four years under the previous President, they didn't charge him with anything because there's actually no evidence to suggest that he committed." "A position you only magically started to take in the last two years, not one during the Biden administration." "Who should be charged next? Who should be charged next? Who should be charged next?" "You're only interested in the files because you know you can use this to go after the President." "Because you didn't care about this for four years for a reason!" "Of the files that have been released so far, who should be charged? Based on -- anyone yet? I'm just -- I'm asking that question" "[H]ave you seen any evidence of a crime yet? Or, is the argument that, well, we haven't seen all the files, so we -- the additional files might have some crime done?" "So, I guess my main point here is that -- but is your -- but is your argument that Merrick Garland and his DOJ -- they saw evidence and chose not to pursue?"
2:18

BOOM: Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calls out Brian Tyler Cohen and Geoff Duncan for implying Donald Trump was a co-conspirator in Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes... "What crime did Trump commit as it relates directly to Epstein? Because you're mentioning that he's in the files with the implication, of course, that a crime was committed. And yet, for four years under the previous President, they didn't charge him with anything because there's actually no evidence to suggest that he committed." "A position you only magically started to take in the last two years, not one during the Biden administration." "Who should be charged next? Who should be charged next? Who should be charged next?" "You're only interested in the files because you know you can use this to go after the President." "Because you didn't care about this for four years for a reason!" "Of the files that have been released so far, who should be charged? Based on -- anyone yet? I'm just -- I'm asking that question" "[H]ave you seen any evidence of a crime yet? Or, is the argument that, well, we haven't seen all the files, so we -- the additional files might have some crime done?" "So, I guess my main point here is that -- but is your -- but is your argument that Merrick Garland and his DOJ -- they saw evidence and chose not to pursue?"

Curtis Houck

69,157 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says, "A case is going on for the Sambhal mosque. Our mosques are being snatched away. In this country, one can say 'I love Modi' but not 'I love Mohammad'. Where are you taking this nation? If someone says 'I love Modi', the media also becomes happy. If someone says 'I love Mohammad', then that is objected to. If I am a Muslim, it is because of Muhammad. There is nothing above and beyond that for the 17 crore Indians who participated in the country's independence. We condemn violence... There are videos in which police are lathi-charging and shopkeepers are showering flowers on them. We must keep in mind that the police are only accountable to those in power and no one else. They will beat you tomorrow when the power shifts... No one was named Mohammad other than the Prophet Mohammad. If you install his posters, you have to respect them... I want to ask the government why they are making so many laws, and what is happening? 3000 Muslims in Assam were made homeless, claiming that the construction was on government land... We must not be bothered by the situation. We have to deal with patience. We must do everything within the law. Don't take the law into your own hands. When you act within the law, you will realise that the law is just a spiderweb and nothing else..." (Video Source: AIMIM Social media)
4:42

#WATCH | Hyderabad, Telangana: AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says, "A case is going on for the Sambhal mosque. Our mosques are being snatched away. In this country, one can say 'I love Modi' but not 'I love Mohammad'. Where are you taking this nation? If someone says 'I love Modi', the media also becomes happy. If someone says 'I love Mohammad', then that is objected to. If I am a Muslim, it is because of Muhammad. There is nothing above and beyond that for the 17 crore Indians who participated in the country's independence. We condemn violence... There are videos in which police are lathi-charging and shopkeepers are showering flowers on them. We must keep in mind that the police are only accountable to those in power and no one else. They will beat you tomorrow when the power shifts... No one was named Mohammad other than the Prophet Mohammad. If you install his posters, you have to respect them... I want to ask the government why they are making so many laws, and what is happening? 3000 Muslims in Assam were made homeless, claiming that the construction was on government land... We must not be bothered by the situation. We have to deal with patience. We must do everything within the law. Don't take the law into your own hands. When you act within the law, you will realise that the law is just a spiderweb and nothing else..." (Video Source: AIMIM Social media)

ANI

36,893 views • 11 months ago

A human being’s first instinct is survival. You cannot fight for Kenyans when you are dead. Give kasmuel a chance to tell you his story. I know the story but its not mine to tell. Many times we smile for the cameras but deep inside is alot of pain. Imagine sacrificing your job, your family, your business and your safety for Kenyans but they end up calling you a conman or a project without evidence. Just because you have told them that tribal identity is not a qualification for leadership. Just because you have told them that corruption cannot solve corruption. That is the pain I go through everyday but I just keep fighting. I will not stop. Even if you bring all the negative comments in this world to my post, am fighting to the dying end. Call me a liar a conman a thief a project a traitor, anything. Am never going back. You may not join me today. But with time your conscience will be clearer and your spirit will lead you this way.
2:00

A human being’s first instinct is survival. You cannot fight for Kenyans when you are dead. Give kasmuel a chance to tell you his story. I know the story but its not mine to tell. Many times we smile for the cameras but deep inside is alot of pain. Imagine sacrificing your job, your family, your business and your safety for Kenyans but they end up calling you a conman or a project without evidence. Just because you have told them that tribal identity is not a qualification for leadership. Just because you have told them that corruption cannot solve corruption. That is the pain I go through everyday but I just keep fighting. I will not stop. Even if you bring all the negative comments in this world to my post, am fighting to the dying end. Call me a liar a conman a thief a project a traitor, anything. Am never going back. You may not join me today. But with time your conscience will be clearer and your spirit will lead you this way.

Morara Kebaso

50,318 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Leh, Ladakh | On violent protests, Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council CEO Tashi Gyalson says, "... Innocent people who had come for a peaceful protest, somehow the crowd got mobilised, and suddenly the violence started... The ongoing hunger strike was quite peaceful initially and it was for a larger demand. The people of Ladakh were a little concerned but there wasn't anything to worry about as the government was holding talks from time to time and finding a solution to the issue and had also given assurances that Ladakh would receive constitutional safeguards. Despite this, some narratives began circulating that the government isn't serious about talks and will not take action on constitutional safeguards... Some provocative people started making statements... But we never anticipated it. But on the 24th, such an incident occurred, which is unfortunate, and I strongly condemn it... We have requested the LG that there should be a thorough investigation into this. There should be transparency and accountability... When violence broke out, there was a lot of strictness from the police, and the result was this: four young people lost their lives, and many others were injured... There should be accountability for all the violence... There should be accountability for the excessive use of force to control the violence..." (26.09)
4:45

#WATCH | Leh, Ladakh | On violent protests, Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council CEO Tashi Gyalson says, "... Innocent people who had come for a peaceful protest, somehow the crowd got mobilised, and suddenly the violence started... The ongoing hunger strike was quite peaceful initially and it was for a larger demand. The people of Ladakh were a little concerned but there wasn't anything to worry about as the government was holding talks from time to time and finding a solution to the issue and had also given assurances that Ladakh would receive constitutional safeguards. Despite this, some narratives began circulating that the government isn't serious about talks and will not take action on constitutional safeguards... Some provocative people started making statements... But we never anticipated it. But on the 24th, such an incident occurred, which is unfortunate, and I strongly condemn it... We have requested the LG that there should be a thorough investigation into this. There should be transparency and accountability... When violence broke out, there was a lot of strictness from the police, and the result was this: four young people lost their lives, and many others were injured... There should be accountability for all the violence... There should be accountability for the excessive use of force to control the violence..." (26.09)

ANI

37,207 views • 11 months ago

Arresting Don Lemon makes him the face of the First Amendment. TWO Black journalists were arrested for covering a protest, NOT for protesting. The First Amendment protects the press. To be clear — I believe houses of worship should be off limits. Protesting inside churches is wrong. But COVERING those protests as a member of the press is NOT. Frankly, his arrest should scare you. If the government tells reporters what protests they can cover, who they can quote, or when they can show up — that’s a problem. That’s not a free country. You don’t get to arrest accredited journalists because you don’t like the optics. Trump made it personal. Now the whole country is watching. Don Lemon — this is your moment. And everyone else in media should be proud to have your back.
1:50

Arresting Don Lemon makes him the face of the First Amendment. TWO Black journalists were arrested for covering a protest, NOT for protesting. The First Amendment protects the press. To be clear — I believe houses of worship should be off limits. Protesting inside churches is wrong. But COVERING those protests as a member of the press is NOT. Frankly, his arrest should scare you. If the government tells reporters what protests they can cover, who they can quote, or when they can show up — that’s a problem. That’s not a free country. You don’t get to arrest accredited journalists because you don’t like the optics. Trump made it personal. Now the whole country is watching. Don Lemon — this is your moment. And everyone else in media should be proud to have your back.

Van Jones

36,463 views • 6 months ago

VIDEO | Parliament Monsoon Session: On Opposition's issues in the parliament, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "One issue is the theft of donations in Ayodhya, the second is the NEET examination, matters concerning students that the Congress has been raising for several months now. Our request was simply that these issues should be discussed. The government is not ready to accept anything. If a discussion takes place inside Parliament, it is good for everyone. I don't know what they are so afraid of when it comes to having a discussion. They have a massive majority, so let the voice of the country be heard in Parliament; that is exactly what Parliament is meant for. But when you refuse and insist on only raising your own topics, the opposition naturally becomes dissatisfied. That is the whole point." On the lathi charge at Jantar Mantar, Tharoor says, "It's very sad. I mean, I don't understand the spirit in which some of these things are being done. When a non-violent protest is taking place, what is the reason for a lathi charge? A lathi charge is not an act of non-violence; it is an act of violence. I don't understand the logic of this." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:27

VIDEO | Parliament Monsoon Session: On Opposition's issues in the parliament, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "One issue is the theft of donations in Ayodhya, the second is the NEET examination, matters concerning students that the Congress has been raising for several months now. Our request was simply that these issues should be discussed. The government is not ready to accept anything. If a discussion takes place inside Parliament, it is good for everyone. I don't know what they are so afraid of when it comes to having a discussion. They have a massive majority, so let the voice of the country be heard in Parliament; that is exactly what Parliament is meant for. But when you refuse and insist on only raising your own topics, the opposition naturally becomes dissatisfied. That is the whole point." On the lathi charge at Jantar Mantar, Tharoor says, "It's very sad. I mean, I don't understand the spirit in which some of these things are being done. When a non-violent protest is taking place, what is the reason for a lathi charge? A lathi charge is not an act of non-violence; it is an act of violence. I don't understand the logic of this." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

28,097 views • 1 month ago

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment. Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR. The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution. The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha
3:18

Not for a moment will I ever say that we must not give premium to innocence. Democracy is nurtured, its core values blossom, and human rights are taken at a high pedestal when we believe in innocence till the guilt is established. Therefore, I must not be misunderstood as casting aspersions on any individual. But then, in a democratic nation, purity of its criminal justice system defines its direction. Investigation is required. No investigation under law is in progress at the moment. Because for a criminal investigation, the initiation has to be by an FIR—First Information Report. It is not there. It is the law of the land that every cognizable offence is required to be reported to the police. And failure to do so—failure to report a cognizable offence—is a crime. Therefore, you all will be wondering why there has been no FIR. The answer is simple. An FIR in this country can be registered against anyone—any constitutional functionary, including the one before you. One has only to activate the rule of law. No permission is required. But if it is judges—FIR cannot be straightaway registered. It has to be approved by the concerned in judiciary. But that is not given in the Constitution. The Constitution of India has accorded immunity from prosecution only to the Hon'ble President and the Hon'ble Governors. So how come a category beyond law has secured this immunity? Because the ill-effects of this are being felt in the mind of one and all. Every Indian, young and old, is deeply concerned. If the event had taken place at his house, the speed would have been an electronic rocket. Now, it is not even a cattle cart. #RajyaSabha

Vice-President of India

95,655 views • 1 year ago

This Has the Potential to be HUGE! Idaho House Passed a Bill that would Allow the DEATH PENALTY for Heinous Pedophile Crimes— Which Could EXPAND Nationwide 🙌 Rep. Bruce, Skaug, R-Nampa, who co-sponsored the bill, along with Rep. Josh Tanner, R-Eagle, said that House Bill 515 is designed to give the steepest penalty to the most heinous of crimes committed against children 11 years of age and younger. And that HB-515 would be in line with that of first-degree murder. “There is a deep, dark, dark side in our culture, and it’s our job to protect the children. There are times when things are so wicked that retribution is appropriate. It would be very rare that this case would happen, but it will happen. And I say to you when you see that case, you read it in the newspaper you’re going to say this is the once case this needs to happen.” How this could be Applied Nationwide? There is hope that if this becomes law, the U.S. Supreme Court will review the Idaho bill, and therefore issue a ruling that would EXPAND the eligibility for the death penalty in every single State! PLEASE LORD, let this happen Nationwide!
1:15

This Has the Potential to be HUGE! Idaho House Passed a Bill that would Allow the DEATH PENALTY for Heinous Pedophile Crimes— Which Could EXPAND Nationwide 🙌 Rep. Bruce, Skaug, R-Nampa, who co-sponsored the bill, along with Rep. Josh Tanner, R-Eagle, said that House Bill 515 is designed to give the steepest penalty to the most heinous of crimes committed against children 11 years of age and younger. And that HB-515 would be in line with that of first-degree murder. “There is a deep, dark, dark side in our culture, and it’s our job to protect the children. There are times when things are so wicked that retribution is appropriate. It would be very rare that this case would happen, but it will happen. And I say to you when you see that case, you read it in the newspaper you’re going to say this is the once case this needs to happen.” How this could be Applied Nationwide? There is hope that if this becomes law, the U.S. Supreme Court will review the Idaho bill, and therefore issue a ruling that would EXPAND the eligibility for the death penalty in every single State! PLEASE LORD, let this happen Nationwide!

MJTruthUltra

58,297 views • 2 years ago

Elon Musk’s real claim about Optimus isn’t that it’s the biggest product ever made. It’s that the biggest product ever made is a tenth of it. Musk: “I think it will be 10 times bigger than the next biggest product ever made.” That isn’t a claim about robots. It’s a claim about every object humans have ever sold each other, and it only holds once you notice what they all had in common. Every product ever built shipped incomplete. The drill needs a hand. The car needs a driver. The phone needs someone awake and holding it. All of it was leverage, and leverage does nothing until something pushes on it. You were the missing part in every machine ever made. That was the design, not a flaw. Optimus is the first product that arrives with the operator already inside. Which is why the company that got there first was never going to be a robotics company. Musk: “Tesla is the only company with all the required ingredients.” The mind and the body were never built by the same people. Labs that can think can’t stamp metal. Companies that can stamp metal can’t think. Tesla spent a decade mass-producing a machine that already has to see, decide, and move through a world full of people. Then priced it for a driveway instead of a defense contract. The robot is that machine with the road taken away. Musk: “You should be able to ask them to do things naturally.” A machine that has to be programmed sells to the people who can program. A machine you can talk to sells to anyone with something they’d rather not be doing. Every product in history was priced against another product. A better phone. A faster car. A cheaper tool. This one is priced against a wage. Wages are the largest line item on earth and the only cost technology has never driven down. Labor is the only thing anyone has ever sold that the seller never gets back. Every wage ever paid was a life billed by the hour. Musk: “Nothing will even be close.” Nothing else is close because everything else was capped by buyers. Demand for a product ends when everyone who wanted one has it. Demand for work doesn’t end. The ceiling was never how many people would buy it. It was how much there is to do, and there has never been a shortage of that. Only of hands. The prediction isn’t that Optimus succeeds. It’s that if it does, it enters the oldest and largest market on earth, one that has never had a competitor. Every product ever made sold you a better way to spend your hours. This one sells the hours back.
0:54

Elon Musk’s real claim about Optimus isn’t that it’s the biggest product ever made. It’s that the biggest product ever made is a tenth of it. Musk: “I think it will be 10 times bigger than the next biggest product ever made.” That isn’t a claim about robots. It’s a claim about every object humans have ever sold each other, and it only holds once you notice what they all had in common. Every product ever built shipped incomplete. The drill needs a hand. The car needs a driver. The phone needs someone awake and holding it. All of it was leverage, and leverage does nothing until something pushes on it. You were the missing part in every machine ever made. That was the design, not a flaw. Optimus is the first product that arrives with the operator already inside. Which is why the company that got there first was never going to be a robotics company. Musk: “Tesla is the only company with all the required ingredients.” The mind and the body were never built by the same people. Labs that can think can’t stamp metal. Companies that can stamp metal can’t think. Tesla spent a decade mass-producing a machine that already has to see, decide, and move through a world full of people. Then priced it for a driveway instead of a defense contract. The robot is that machine with the road taken away. Musk: “You should be able to ask them to do things naturally.” A machine that has to be programmed sells to the people who can program. A machine you can talk to sells to anyone with something they’d rather not be doing. Every product in history was priced against another product. A better phone. A faster car. A cheaper tool. This one is priced against a wage. Wages are the largest line item on earth and the only cost technology has never driven down. Labor is the only thing anyone has ever sold that the seller never gets back. Every wage ever paid was a life billed by the hour. Musk: “Nothing will even be close.” Nothing else is close because everything else was capped by buyers. Demand for a product ends when everyone who wanted one has it. Demand for work doesn’t end. The ceiling was never how many people would buy it. It was how much there is to do, and there has never been a shortage of that. Only of hands. The prediction isn’t that Optimus succeeds. It’s that if it does, it enters the oldest and largest market on earth, one that has never had a competitor. Every product ever made sold you a better way to spend your hours. This one sells the hours back.

Dustin

49,627 views • 1 month ago

Nancy Guthrie I have always been a huge supporter of private searches for the missing by volunteers, but not like this. Please: *Wear Gloves *Keep the item you found where you found it. *Take a photo *Do not move it. That is LE's Job LE (Pima County)- What in the heck are you doing? Did you fail evidence collection at the academy? This officer needs a remedial course. Use a paper evidence collection bag (not plastic-she knew she was going there to collect evidence). Plastic degrades DNA and this one is too small. Even a child would recognize not to stuff something 3 times too big into a bag 3 times too small. Also, did you notice something fell out? Do I think this is related, unlikely but possible. Whenever there is a possibility it could be evidence, take it, but treat it like evidence. Maybe it was used in another crime. This happens. I have lost faith. How was the evidence collection handled inside Nancy's house if this is how evidence collection happens when all eyes are looking? #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieCase
0:27

Nancy Guthrie I have always been a huge supporter of private searches for the missing by volunteers, but not like this. Please: *Wear Gloves *Keep the item you found where you found it. *Take a photo *Do not move it. That is LE's Job LE (Pima County)- What in the heck are you doing? Did you fail evidence collection at the academy? This officer needs a remedial course. Use a paper evidence collection bag (not plastic-she knew she was going there to collect evidence). Plastic degrades DNA and this one is too small. Even a child would recognize not to stuff something 3 times too big into a bag 3 times too small. Also, did you notice something fell out? Do I think this is related, unlikely but possible. Whenever there is a possibility it could be evidence, take it, but treat it like evidence. Maybe it was used in another crime. This happens. I have lost faith. How was the evidence collection handled inside Nancy's house if this is how evidence collection happens when all eyes are looking? #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieCase

Jennifer Coffindaffer

43,746 views • 6 months ago

Michael Fanone’s Bodycam Raises Serious Questions | Full Evidence Breakdown So it’s time to slow this down and look at the evidence. What you are watching here is body worn camera video attributed to Michael Fanone. This frame matters. Because it directly contradicts public claims that he was unconscious at this moment. If someone is fully out, they are not adjusting equipment. That is not an opinion. That is a physical reality. This is why I’m releasing this in parts. Because the full picture requires multiple angles. Bodycam footage. CCTV footage. Open-source crowd video. And court transcripts. I’m not asking you to believe me. I’m asking you to watch the footage and compare it to sworn testimony. If the story is accurate, it should match the video. If it does not match the video, people have the right to ask questions. This is not about attacking law enforcement. I genuinely want to believe not every officer acted improperly that day. But accountability requires honesty. And silence from those who know better only deepens mistrust. I’ve already lost enough. My reputation matters. I would not put this out if the evidence didn’t support scrutiny. This is not about violence. It’s about truth. It’s about transparency. And it’s about due process. More footage and full context will follow. 🫡🇺🇸 Watch closely. Decide for yourself.
2:55

Michael Fanone’s Bodycam Raises Serious Questions | Full Evidence Breakdown So it’s time to slow this down and look at the evidence. What you are watching here is body worn camera video attributed to Michael Fanone. This frame matters. Because it directly contradicts public claims that he was unconscious at this moment. If someone is fully out, they are not adjusting equipment. That is not an opinion. That is a physical reality. This is why I’m releasing this in parts. Because the full picture requires multiple angles. Bodycam footage. CCTV footage. Open-source crowd video. And court transcripts. I’m not asking you to believe me. I’m asking you to watch the footage and compare it to sworn testimony. If the story is accurate, it should match the video. If it does not match the video, people have the right to ask questions. This is not about attacking law enforcement. I genuinely want to believe not every officer acted improperly that day. But accountability requires honesty. And silence from those who know better only deepens mistrust. I’ve already lost enough. My reputation matters. I would not put this out if the evidence didn’t support scrutiny. This is not about violence. It’s about truth. It’s about transparency. And it’s about due process. More footage and full context will follow. 🫡🇺🇸 Watch closely. Decide for yourself.

Ryan Nichols Sr.

88,936 views • 7 months ago

A woman was confronted by police after her neighbor’s camera captured someone taking a delivered package from her front door. The footage allegedly shows the person entering the home. Now the internet is divided over who should be held accountable. If a neighbor’s camera clearly captures the person responsible should the homeowner where the perpetrator resides be forced to pay a fine face eviction or bear any financial responsibility for the theft? Some argue that you cannot control who enters your home and holding a homeowner accountable for someone else’s actions sets a dangerous legal precedent. Others argue that if you knowingly house someone with a pattern of criminal behavior you bear some responsibility for enabling it. Here is the real question - if camera evidence clearly identifies the thief does the case become simple or does it get more complicated when that person is connected to another household? Porch pirates are a growing problem across America. Package theft costs consumers billions every year. But the legal and moral responsibility when a third party is involved is not always black and white. What do you think? Video via/ 410dwill45 on IG… For educational and informational purposes only.
1:55

A woman was confronted by police after her neighbor’s camera captured someone taking a delivered package from her front door. The footage allegedly shows the person entering the home. Now the internet is divided over who should be held accountable. If a neighbor’s camera clearly captures the person responsible should the homeowner where the perpetrator resides be forced to pay a fine face eviction or bear any financial responsibility for the theft? Some argue that you cannot control who enters your home and holding a homeowner accountable for someone else’s actions sets a dangerous legal precedent. Others argue that if you knowingly house someone with a pattern of criminal behavior you bear some responsibility for enabling it. Here is the real question - if camera evidence clearly identifies the thief does the case become simple or does it get more complicated when that person is connected to another household? Porch pirates are a growing problem across America. Package theft costs consumers billions every year. But the legal and moral responsibility when a third party is involved is not always black and white. What do you think? Video via/ 410dwill45 on IG… For educational and informational purposes only.

Tony Lane 🇺🇸

23,903 views • 2 months ago

It's impossible to describe what Erika Kirk has gone through. Even in this video in which her topic is the division that killed her husband and has triggered three assassination attempts on Trump, she is still attacked, mocked, and slandered. People even complaining "why is she wearing black!?" Because they complain when she wears gold and when she wears white as well. When she shows up, and when she doesn't. When she looks 'suspicious' or 'odd' or 'weird'. Or connected to conspiracies crafted out of thin air. "Erika is a liar", Ok, then do two things: name the lies, and connect those lies to the accusations she has suffered for months. Because otherwise you're just another agitator that has zero proof, zero evidence, and only ad hominem attacks in the name of 'asking questions'. You never really cared about the truth. You have just used Charlie Kirk's murder as a telenovela, agitated by brainrot podcasters that only want a free lunch out of a case that, if you applied just a bit of common sense, it would be easy to connect the dots. The videos I made were precisely for that, but it's obvious that the conspiracies are juicier content for the watercooler. For those of you who still debate, and argument, and discuss, and bring receipts to these deranged fools that keep ignoring every single piece of actual evidence, my hat is off. I don't have the energy or time for that. I just block them at this point. You're definitely better than me. I can just keep doing what I think is right. And what is needed right now is for every single person, every single one, to look inside themselves. But if they have become this blind to external reality, to facts, to critical thinking, I don't have much hopes for any true self reflection.
10:03

It's impossible to describe what Erika Kirk has gone through. Even in this video in which her topic is the division that killed her husband and has triggered three assassination attempts on Trump, she is still attacked, mocked, and slandered. People even complaining "why is she wearing black!?" Because they complain when she wears gold and when she wears white as well. When she shows up, and when she doesn't. When she looks 'suspicious' or 'odd' or 'weird'. Or connected to conspiracies crafted out of thin air. "Erika is a liar", Ok, then do two things: name the lies, and connect those lies to the accusations she has suffered for months. Because otherwise you're just another agitator that has zero proof, zero evidence, and only ad hominem attacks in the name of 'asking questions'. You never really cared about the truth. You have just used Charlie Kirk's murder as a telenovela, agitated by brainrot podcasters that only want a free lunch out of a case that, if you applied just a bit of common sense, it would be easy to connect the dots. The videos I made were precisely for that, but it's obvious that the conspiracies are juicier content for the watercooler. For those of you who still debate, and argument, and discuss, and bring receipts to these deranged fools that keep ignoring every single piece of actual evidence, my hat is off. I don't have the energy or time for that. I just block them at this point. You're definitely better than me. I can just keep doing what I think is right. And what is needed right now is for every single person, every single one, to look inside themselves. But if they have become this blind to external reality, to facts, to critical thinking, I don't have much hopes for any true self reflection.

Jesús Enrique Rosas

13,205 views • 4 months ago

Did you know in some states when a neighbor cuts down a tree, if it falls into your yard and damages your property, it’s deemed an “act of god” and you are responsible for the damages to your property. For me this could be a huge headache for many people, it shows no accountability. If the neighbor’s tree damages someone else property, you would think that it’s their responsibility since it’s their tree and it’s their actions that caused the damage. Why on earth would any state have this law is beyond me, I wouldn’t want to live in an area like that, where one day you are on top and the next day you could be thousands in debt. What would you do if this was the case for you?
1:00

Did you know in some states when a neighbor cuts down a tree, if it falls into your yard and damages your property, it’s deemed an “act of god” and you are responsible for the damages to your property. For me this could be a huge headache for many people, it shows no accountability. If the neighbor’s tree damages someone else property, you would think that it’s their responsibility since it’s their tree and it’s their actions that caused the damage. Why on earth would any state have this law is beyond me, I wouldn’t want to live in an area like that, where one day you are on top and the next day you could be thousands in debt. What would you do if this was the case for you?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

104,106 views • 3 months ago

Would you want to be a teacher on your staff as a principal? I have often asked teachers, would you want to be a learner in your own classroom, but the question above for administrators could be even more critical. If we do not support those closest to students every day in an effective manner, it is much harder for things to improve in schools. If we want learning to look different in classrooms, then leadership must also evolve. This doesn’t mean that everything done in the past has been wrong. Some things that mattered 50 years ago will matter now, both in learning and leadership. But replicating everything that was done in the past, whether it was effective or not, isn’t a great strategy for moving schools forward. I was blessed to learn from some amazing principals in my career, but I also learned about things that I hated as a teacher and swore that I would do my best not to replicate those strategies. I wrote this in my upcoming book co-authored with Allyson Apsey (Allyson Apsey) titled, “What Makes a Great Principal”: “If we do things in our schools and classrooms that were done hundreds of years ago that still work today, we should continue to do them. On the other hand, if we do new stuff just because it is new, but it doesn’t work, we shouldn’t be doing it. Whatever works for our community is where our focus should be, no matter when it originated.” What worked in the past? What would you change? What would you have wanted as a teacher, and how can you make that happen? Simply replicating the strategies of the past, whether good or bad, will not necessarily lead education to a better future. Innovation is crucial to leadership as much as it is to teaching and learning.
1:25

Would you want to be a teacher on your staff as a principal? I have often asked teachers, would you want to be a learner in your own classroom, but the question above for administrators could be even more critical. If we do not support those closest to students every day in an effective manner, it is much harder for things to improve in schools. If we want learning to look different in classrooms, then leadership must also evolve. This doesn’t mean that everything done in the past has been wrong. Some things that mattered 50 years ago will matter now, both in learning and leadership. But replicating everything that was done in the past, whether it was effective or not, isn’t a great strategy for moving schools forward. I was blessed to learn from some amazing principals in my career, but I also learned about things that I hated as a teacher and swore that I would do my best not to replicate those strategies. I wrote this in my upcoming book co-authored with Allyson Apsey (Allyson Apsey) titled, “What Makes a Great Principal”: “If we do things in our schools and classrooms that were done hundreds of years ago that still work today, we should continue to do them. On the other hand, if we do new stuff just because it is new, but it doesn’t work, we shouldn’t be doing it. Whatever works for our community is where our focus should be, no matter when it originated.” What worked in the past? What would you change? What would you have wanted as a teacher, and how can you make that happen? Simply replicating the strategies of the past, whether good or bad, will not necessarily lead education to a better future. Innovation is crucial to leadership as much as it is to teaching and learning.

George Couros

22,738 views • 2 years ago