Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Union Minister Jitendra Singh to Table Paper Leak Bill - BJP fields Bansuri Swaraj, Tejasvi Surya for debate - NDA allies to back anti-paper leak bill - TDP, JD(U), Shiv Sena MPs to speak - NCP, Apna Dal, LJP MPs join debate - Sayoni Ghosh, Mitali Ghosh may back...

TimesNow's profile picture

TIMES NOW

9,796,146 subscribers

111,654 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING || Union Minister Jitendra Singh introduced Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Lok Sabha The Speaker urged the Opposition to debate the anti-paper leak Bill, but they refused, leading to the Lok Sabha being adjourned till 2 PM: Pragya Kaushika shares more details with MEGHNA DEKA
3:00

BREAKING || Union Minister Jitendra Singh introduced Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Lok Sabha The Speaker urged the Opposition to debate the anti-paper leak Bill, but they refused, leading to the Lok Sabha being adjourned till 2 PM: Pragya Kaushika shares more details with MEGHNA DEKA

TIMES NOW

69,184 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

BIG NEWS 🚨 Union Minister Kiren Rijiju requests Opposition to discuss anti paper leak bill. Despite this, Opposition disrupted Parliament, and Lok Sabha was adjourned for the day. 😳 KIREN RIJIJU : "Please, This is a very important Bill for students. All the speakers are ready. MPs from both sides have come prepared. Congress party and its allies are deliberately preventing a discussion on this Bill"
3:42

BIG NEWS 🚨 Union Minister Kiren Rijiju requests Opposition to discuss anti paper leak bill. Despite this, Opposition disrupted Parliament, and Lok Sabha was adjourned for the day. 😳 KIREN RIJIJU : "Please, This is a very important Bill for students. All the speakers are ready. MPs from both sides have come prepared. Congress party and its allies are deliberately preventing a discussion on this Bill"

News Algebra

117,005 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

VIDEO | Delhi: During a debate in the Rajya Sabha over the anti-paper leak bill, BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi says, "The central government is sensitive, Union ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh held two rounds of talks; Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned while respecting students' feelings." (Full video available on PTI Videos -
2:47

VIDEO | Delhi: During a debate in the Rajya Sabha over the anti-paper leak bill, BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi says, "The central government is sensitive, Union ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh held two rounds of talks; Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned while respecting students' feelings." (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

17,609 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“I had asked Uddhav Thackeray to join BJP back in 2019. He had refused; had he joined us, all MPs would've stayed under his leadership. One day he will also return to NDA.” - Union Minister Ramdas Athawale on Shiv Sena (UBT) rebel MPs joining Shinde faction
2:21

“I had asked Uddhav Thackeray to join BJP back in 2019. He had refused; had he joined us, all MPs would've stayed under his leadership. One day he will also return to NDA.” - Union Minister Ramdas Athawale on Shiv Sena (UBT) rebel MPs joining Shinde faction

News Arena India

84,954 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“Dubai based businessmen sent 23 people to join NEET protests. I saw this on Malyalam news channel. What they had to do with this protest? Such efforts to hijack students' movement must be probed. Amit Shah must investigate such elements.” - JD(U) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha in Rajya Sabha during debate on anti-paper leak bill
1:54

“Dubai based businessmen sent 23 people to join NEET protests. I saw this on Malyalam news channel. What they had to do with this protest? Such efforts to hijack students' movement must be probed. Amit Shah must investigate such elements.” - JD(U) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha in Rajya Sabha during debate on anti-paper leak bill

News Arena India

109,392 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

SHOCKING 🚨 Mahua Moitra started shouting in Loksabha during Abhishek Banerjee's speech on Anti Paper Leak Bill😳 MAHUA - "Party supports bill but will not steer away from holding govt responsible on the NEET issue. They can't expect us to back them for coming up with bucket of water after igniting fire"
0:53

SHOCKING 🚨 Mahua Moitra started shouting in Loksabha during Abhishek Banerjee's speech on Anti Paper Leak Bill😳 MAHUA - "Party supports bill but will not steer away from holding govt responsible on the NEET issue. They can't expect us to back them for coming up with bucket of water after igniting fire"

News Algebra

398,642 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi Targets Opposition During Anti-Paper Leak Bill Debate During the Rajya Sabha debate on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi launched a sharp attack on the Opposition. He alleged that several paper leaks occurred during the tenure of former Union Education Minister Kapil Sibal, who has now offered legal assistance to NEET protesters. Trivedi also claimed that medical seats were "auctioned" under previous governments, while asserting that under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, students from economically weaker backgrounds have secured admissions on merit. In his speech, Trivedi further criticised remarks made by Opposition leaders on caste and the examination system, questioning the basis for different standards in setting question papers. These remarks were made as part of the broader parliamentary debate on the anti-paper leak legislation and reflect the BJP's political position; the claims themselves remain contested in Parliament. Credit : News Monday Six.
2:42

Dr. Sudhanshu Trivedi Targets Opposition During Anti-Paper Leak Bill Debate During the Rajya Sabha debate on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi launched a sharp attack on the Opposition. He alleged that several paper leaks occurred during the tenure of former Union Education Minister Kapil Sibal, who has now offered legal assistance to NEET protesters. Trivedi also claimed that medical seats were "auctioned" under previous governments, while asserting that under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, students from economically weaker backgrounds have secured admissions on merit. In his speech, Trivedi further criticised remarks made by Opposition leaders on caste and the examination system, questioning the basis for different standards in setting question papers. These remarks were made as part of the broader parliamentary debate on the anti-paper leak legislation and reflect the BJP's political position; the claims themselves remain contested in Parliament. Credit : News Monday Six.

Augadh

52,992 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“Meta chief called to explain taking down of PM's video, but who will explain us on student protesters monitored through Meta glasses by police. We met those students. Doctor said I cannot say anything and told us to meet Health Minister. Supriya Sule couldn't use Whatsapp for 3 days as there is a limit on forwarded messages.” - DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran at LS during debate on anti-paper leak bill
3:37

“Meta chief called to explain taking down of PM's video, but who will explain us on student protesters monitored through Meta glasses by police. We met those students. Doctor said I cannot say anything and told us to meet Health Minister. Supriya Sule couldn't use Whatsapp for 3 days as there is a limit on forwarded messages.” - DMK MP Dayanidhi Maran at LS during debate on anti-paper leak bill

News Arena India

20,763 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Why BJP is known as party with a Difference!! Today, during the discussion on Paper Leak Bill, Rahul Gandhi used unparliamentary language which led to huge issue inside the parliament. NDA MPs were shouting at Rahul Gandhi and asked him to apologise. Rajnath Singh Stood up and asked his own leaders to remain silent and Listen to Rahul Gandhi!! I still remember when PM Modi was speaking during last session, he was continuously hooted by INDI Alliance!! Rahul and Priyanka were leading them!!
0:24

Why BJP is known as party with a Difference!! Today, during the discussion on Paper Leak Bill, Rahul Gandhi used unparliamentary language which led to huge issue inside the parliament. NDA MPs were shouting at Rahul Gandhi and asked him to apologise. Rajnath Singh Stood up and asked his own leaders to remain silent and Listen to Rahul Gandhi!! I still remember when PM Modi was speaking during last session, he was continuously hooted by INDI Alliance!! Rahul and Priyanka were leading them!!

Rohit

99,319 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

MEMORY REFRESH- “Several paper leaks happened during Kapil Sibal's tenure as education minister, who has now pledged legal aid for NEET protesters. (Hindi Shayari) During their rule medical seats were auctioned. This time labourer’s son, auto driver's son and maid's daughter got admission and credit for this goes to PM Narendra Modi. Wealth people are unhappy as they failed to secure admissions for their children. Their leader told in Geneva that question papers are set by one caste so people of that caste are selected more. What is the difference in formula for difference castes?” - BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi in Rajya Sabha during debate on anti-paper leak Bill
2:45

MEMORY REFRESH- “Several paper leaks happened during Kapil Sibal's tenure as education minister, who has now pledged legal aid for NEET protesters. (Hindi Shayari) During their rule medical seats were auctioned. This time labourer’s son, auto driver's son and maid's daughter got admission and credit for this goes to PM Narendra Modi. Wealth people are unhappy as they failed to secure admissions for their children. Their leader told in Geneva that question papers are set by one caste so people of that caste are selected more. What is the difference in formula for difference castes?” - BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi in Rajya Sabha during debate on anti-paper leak Bill

News Arena India

81,134 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

DMK REGISTERED ITS OPPOSITION THROUGH VOTING, NOT A WALKOUT Objecting to Vande Mataram Bill has consistently been the DMK’s stated position, including during its confrontations with the former Governor. But it’s worth remembering that when the Bill came up for voting, the DMK did not stage a walkout they voted against it. The same happened in the Rajya Sabha. While the rest of the Opposition walked out before the Anti-Paper Leak Bill was passed, the DMK stayed back, moved all its amendments and voted against the legislation. Ahead of the session, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin had directed the party’s MPs to oppose and raise their voice against any measure they believed was against the interests of the people of Tamil Nadu.
1:38

DMK REGISTERED ITS OPPOSITION THROUGH VOTING, NOT A WALKOUT Objecting to Vande Mataram Bill has consistently been the DMK’s stated position, including during its confrontations with the former Governor. But it’s worth remembering that when the Bill came up for voting, the DMK did not stage a walkout they voted against it. The same happened in the Rajya Sabha. While the rest of the Opposition walked out before the Anti-Paper Leak Bill was passed, the DMK stayed back, moved all its amendments and voted against the legislation. Ahead of the session, Chief Minister M.K. Stalin had directed the party’s MPs to oppose and raise their voice against any measure they believed was against the interests of the people of Tamil Nadu.

🦏 Payal M/પાયલ મેહતા/ पायल मेहता/ পাযেল মেহতা

28,964 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

VIDEO | Delhi: Reacting to Rahul Gandhi’s remarks during anti-paper leak bill debate, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal (Kapil Sibal) says, “What comment did he make? Rahul Gandhi said nothing wrong. He said that he had spoken to a student…Why has the Home Minister remained silent to this day? Such a major incident has taken place. Women were assaulted, their clothes were torn, they suffered injuries, and they are admitted to hospitals. Yet the Home Minister remains silent. On top of that, leaders of the BJP were saying that no pellet guns had even been used. And when it was conclusively established that pellet guns had indeed been used, the Home Minister still remained silent.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -
1:41

VIDEO | Delhi: Reacting to Rahul Gandhi’s remarks during anti-paper leak bill debate, Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal (Kapil Sibal) says, “What comment did he make? Rahul Gandhi said nothing wrong. He said that he had spoken to a student…Why has the Home Minister remained silent to this day? Such a major incident has taken place. Women were assaulted, their clothes were torn, they suffered injuries, and they are admitted to hospitals. Yet the Home Minister remains silent. On top of that, leaders of the BJP were saying that no pellet guns had even been used. And when it was conclusively established that pellet guns had indeed been used, the Home Minister still remained silent.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

117,654 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“𝐀 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐞𝐠𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜” Above quote is borrowed from Adam Grant, an organization psychologist and author of many books. He makes the point that toxic ego in leaders manifests as a need to silence criticism and to intimidate those that may hold views different from theirs. I watched with disbelief earlier this week when the President told elected members of his own party that they were unfit to be in Parliament. Yes, this was the import of the message by President Boko to members who were in Parliament (the opposition had walked out). In his view, the Constitutional Amendment Bill should be debated by lawyers. “Tota e bile e kabe go tletse di agente ha, go betswa molao, eseng 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒂.” The last word is my addition. Even though the President did not complete the toxic sentence, the message was clear, those in the house were too ignorant to engage on the subject matter. He achieved what he wanted, his MPs were overwhelmed with self doubt. Not a single member of Parliament from the ruling party back bench stood up to debate the much talked about Constitutional Amendment Bill. In effect, the ruling party MPs boycotted the debate through their silence while the opposition boycotted by walking out. The Nwa Metsi Brigade in support of their supreme leader, hope to silence everyone who shares a view that does not align with their script. Some, like the UDC MPs, will succumb and resort to deafening silence. Some of us have long committed ourselves to Speak Truth To Power. Those opposed to a piecemeal amendment of the constitution, now is the time to make your voice heard. #withdrawthebill #Kgololo #askdumelang
0:37

“𝐀 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐲 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐞𝐠𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜” Above quote is borrowed from Adam Grant, an organization psychologist and author of many books. He makes the point that toxic ego in leaders manifests as a need to silence criticism and to intimidate those that may hold views different from theirs. I watched with disbelief earlier this week when the President told elected members of his own party that they were unfit to be in Parliament. Yes, this was the import of the message by President Boko to members who were in Parliament (the opposition had walked out). In his view, the Constitutional Amendment Bill should be debated by lawyers. “Tota e bile e kabe go tletse di agente ha, go betswa molao, eseng 𝒍𝒐𝒏𝒂.” The last word is my addition. Even though the President did not complete the toxic sentence, the message was clear, those in the house were too ignorant to engage on the subject matter. He achieved what he wanted, his MPs were overwhelmed with self doubt. Not a single member of Parliament from the ruling party back bench stood up to debate the much talked about Constitutional Amendment Bill. In effect, the ruling party MPs boycotted the debate through their silence while the opposition boycotted by walking out. The Nwa Metsi Brigade in support of their supreme leader, hope to silence everyone who shares a view that does not align with their script. Some, like the UDC MPs, will succumb and resort to deafening silence. Some of us have long committed ourselves to Speak Truth To Power. Those opposed to a piecemeal amendment of the constitution, now is the time to make your voice heard. #withdrawthebill #Kgololo #askdumelang

Dumelang Saleshando

47,410 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "The Monsoon Session concluded today. We view it from two perspectives. In terms of business, it was a very successful session; we passed a total of 12 bills. However, from the perspective of debate and discussion, it was not as successful. In the Lok Sabha, we achieved only 19% productivity relative to the total time allotted. In the Rajya Sabha, productivity stood at 39%; while opposition parties created a ruckus and occasionally staged walkouts, the majority NDA parties and MPs from some opposition parties participated in the debates and discussions..." He adds, "Only one bill, addressing the issue of paper leaks and unfair means in examinations, underwent a full discussion in the Lok Sabha... The 'Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act' was passed during this session. This legislation was discussed in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha."
1:47

#WATCH | Delhi: Union Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "The Monsoon Session concluded today. We view it from two perspectives. In terms of business, it was a very successful session; we passed a total of 12 bills. However, from the perspective of debate and discussion, it was not as successful. In the Lok Sabha, we achieved only 19% productivity relative to the total time allotted. In the Rajya Sabha, productivity stood at 39%; while opposition parties created a ruckus and occasionally staged walkouts, the majority NDA parties and MPs from some opposition parties participated in the debates and discussions..." He adds, "Only one bill, addressing the issue of paper leaks and unfair means in examinations, underwent a full discussion in the Lok Sabha... The 'Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act' was passed during this session. This legislation was discussed in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha."

ANI

84,516 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Astonishing discussion on Bill Maher as the panelists debate Fauci's culpability in gain of function experiments after reports that British intelligence knew covid was a lab leak back in 2020: Bill Maher: "What do you think of news that British intelligence knew that covid was a lab leak in 2020?" Andrew Sullivan: "Same with the German intelligence service. Core paper that killed off any idea that this was a lab leak: 'Proximal Origins' With Fauci and Collins, was a lie, a conscious lie. This is so freaking obvious this is man made, one of them said. Why would they lie to us about that?" Maher: "The New York Times: said any questioning of this coming from a lab was racist. Why people lost faith in the left: They do stupid stuff like that." Sullivan: "This gain of function research was always dangerous. Anthony Fauci: Remember that name. There's a reason he was given a pardon going back to 2014." Maher: "I don't think he did it for nefarious reasons. I don't think he's an evil guy, who's trying to get rich off this. He just made the wrong call." Sullivan: "He knew the Wuhan lab had security levels that were the average of a dentists' office. NIH NIAID helped fund it. You don't want to go down in history that helped develop the virus that helped kill millions of people." 'You don't want to go down in history that helped develop the virus that helped kill millions of people' Well too bad, that is Fauci's legacy.
4:21

Astonishing discussion on Bill Maher as the panelists debate Fauci's culpability in gain of function experiments after reports that British intelligence knew covid was a lab leak back in 2020: Bill Maher: "What do you think of news that British intelligence knew that covid was a lab leak in 2020?" Andrew Sullivan: "Same with the German intelligence service. Core paper that killed off any idea that this was a lab leak: 'Proximal Origins' With Fauci and Collins, was a lie, a conscious lie. This is so freaking obvious this is man made, one of them said. Why would they lie to us about that?" Maher: "The New York Times: said any questioning of this coming from a lab was racist. Why people lost faith in the left: They do stupid stuff like that." Sullivan: "This gain of function research was always dangerous. Anthony Fauci: Remember that name. There's a reason he was given a pardon going back to 2014." Maher: "I don't think he did it for nefarious reasons. I don't think he's an evil guy, who's trying to get rich off this. He just made the wrong call." Sullivan: "He knew the Wuhan lab had security levels that were the average of a dentists' office. NIH NIAID helped fund it. You don't want to go down in history that helped develop the virus that helped kill millions of people." 'You don't want to go down in history that helped develop the virus that helped kill millions of people' Well too bad, that is Fauci's legacy.

Eric Abbenante

640,934 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Union Minister Jitendra Singh lists the paper leaks during the UPA; he says, "...In 2009- Railway Recruitment Board; 2011- All India Engineering Entrance Examination; 2012- AIIMS New Delhi entrance paper leak; 2013- Maharashtra Secondary Certificate Examination. If I keep listing them, I won't be able to discuss the Bill itself... 2010- B.Ed. Entrance Examination, Uttar Pradesh; 2012- Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. 2009- West Bengal Joint Entrance Exam. Therefore, this government realised the need for dedicated legislation... There are four major recruitment agencies under the Government of India- UPSC, Staff Selection Commission, Railway Recruitment Board, and the Institute of Banking Personnel; and similarly, for higher education admissions, the National Testing Agency. NTA was also constituted in 2017 by this very government. In 1992—for the first time—a recommendation was made to the Government of India, led by the Congress party to establish a common national testing agency. Then, in 2010, during the UPA's tenure, a committee suggested the same thing; I do not know why it was not given due consideration, for whatever reasons or vested interests. So, I think you must compliment Prime Minister Modi and this government. It has completed a task—an unfinished task—that you should have accomplished yourselves." (Source: Sansad TV)
3:08

#WATCH | Union Minister Jitendra Singh lists the paper leaks during the UPA; he says, "...In 2009- Railway Recruitment Board; 2011- All India Engineering Entrance Examination; 2012- AIIMS New Delhi entrance paper leak; 2013- Maharashtra Secondary Certificate Examination. If I keep listing them, I won't be able to discuss the Bill itself... 2010- B.Ed. Entrance Examination, Uttar Pradesh; 2012- Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. 2009- West Bengal Joint Entrance Exam. Therefore, this government realised the need for dedicated legislation... There are four major recruitment agencies under the Government of India- UPSC, Staff Selection Commission, Railway Recruitment Board, and the Institute of Banking Personnel; and similarly, for higher education admissions, the National Testing Agency. NTA was also constituted in 2017 by this very government. In 1992—for the first time—a recommendation was made to the Government of India, led by the Congress party to establish a common national testing agency. Then, in 2010, during the UPA's tenure, a committee suggested the same thing; I do not know why it was not given due consideration, for whatever reasons or vested interests. So, I think you must compliment Prime Minister Modi and this government. It has completed a task—an unfinished task—that you should have accomplished yourselves." (Source: Sansad TV)

ANI

68,376 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | Activist Sonam Wangchuk says, "Today, on the 26th day, I would like to share some important news with you. It's about 12:30 at night. Just a while ago, Union Ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh came here, and the top leaders of the Apex Body of Ladakh also came here. Before that, you know, about 65 MPs from various political parties came and signed, asking us to break our fast. They assured us that they would discuss this issue in Parliament, including the NEET paper leak and the examination system. The ministers who came from the government also assured us that for the past two days, we had been very tough. What can I say, there was a kind of bargaining going on: I want assurances, and they want them in writing. This took two days, and that's why I had to sit on the fast for two more days. I could have sat on it even longer, but finally, today they have given me written assurances..." He adds, "Today they have given written assurances. Our students and youth who are peacefully protesting at Jantar Mantar or those who participated in the 'Sansad Chalo' march on July 20th, no legal action, FIRs, etc. will be taken against them... Secondly, the children who died in this paper leak accident, more than 20 in number, will be given appropriate compensation; compensation will be provided to their families. Thirdly, there will be a thorough discussion and debate in Parliament on this issue and on bringing accountability to the government in education and examinations, to ensure that this does not happen again and that there is full accountability for what has happened. Now you will definitely ask what happened to Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. Firstly, they were unable to give me any assurance as to when this would happen... Now I had two options: either I go on a hunger strike for more weeks, and perhaps that would lead to the end of me. Then thousands of you have been telling me since 2-3 weeks ago that my life is important, and to continue the struggle, I have to stay alive... But I also don't believe that we haven't achieved this. My mind works differently. If he (Dharmendra Pradhan) doesn't do this, doesn't resign, it won't harm the children or us; it will harm the government itself. By not avoiding this small issue, he is harming himself. He should have resigned. Resignation would have stopped all this damage long ago. This wasn't the most important thing for me; it would be resolved on its own. More important to me than any other way was that our children should not be implicated in such cases... I have seen how in Ladakh, for years, FIRs have ruined kids' futures. Nothing like this will happen. We have achieved this from them; I am happy about that, and the families of the deceased children will be given proper compensation. In the highest temple of India's democracy, which is our Parliament, there will be a full debate on this issue and on accountability. I also thank you all very much for supporting this movement." (Source: Sonam Wangchuk/YouTube)
11:30

#WATCH | Activist Sonam Wangchuk says, "Today, on the 26th day, I would like to share some important news with you. It's about 12:30 at night. Just a while ago, Union Ministers JP Nadda and Jitendra Singh came here, and the top leaders of the Apex Body of Ladakh also came here. Before that, you know, about 65 MPs from various political parties came and signed, asking us to break our fast. They assured us that they would discuss this issue in Parliament, including the NEET paper leak and the examination system. The ministers who came from the government also assured us that for the past two days, we had been very tough. What can I say, there was a kind of bargaining going on: I want assurances, and they want them in writing. This took two days, and that's why I had to sit on the fast for two more days. I could have sat on it even longer, but finally, today they have given me written assurances..." He adds, "Today they have given written assurances. Our students and youth who are peacefully protesting at Jantar Mantar or those who participated in the 'Sansad Chalo' march on July 20th, no legal action, FIRs, etc. will be taken against them... Secondly, the children who died in this paper leak accident, more than 20 in number, will be given appropriate compensation; compensation will be provided to their families. Thirdly, there will be a thorough discussion and debate in Parliament on this issue and on bringing accountability to the government in education and examinations, to ensure that this does not happen again and that there is full accountability for what has happened. Now you will definitely ask what happened to Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. Firstly, they were unable to give me any assurance as to when this would happen... Now I had two options: either I go on a hunger strike for more weeks, and perhaps that would lead to the end of me. Then thousands of you have been telling me since 2-3 weeks ago that my life is important, and to continue the struggle, I have to stay alive... But I also don't believe that we haven't achieved this. My mind works differently. If he (Dharmendra Pradhan) doesn't do this, doesn't resign, it won't harm the children or us; it will harm the government itself. By not avoiding this small issue, he is harming himself. He should have resigned. Resignation would have stopped all this damage long ago. This wasn't the most important thing for me; it would be resolved on its own. More important to me than any other way was that our children should not be implicated in such cases... I have seen how in Ladakh, for years, FIRs have ruined kids' futures. Nothing like this will happen. We have achieved this from them; I am happy about that, and the families of the deceased children will be given proper compensation. In the highest temple of India's democracy, which is our Parliament, there will be a full debate on this issue and on accountability. I also thank you all very much for supporting this movement." (Source: Sonam Wangchuk/YouTube)

ANI

98,009 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#BlasphemyBill Passed in #Punjab: A Step Toward Religious Intolerance? On July 15, 2025, the Punjab Legislative Assembly, under the leadership of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann(Bhagwant Mann ) and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP ), passed a controversial Blasphemy Bill that has sparked intense public outcry and fears among minority communities. The bill, which mandates capital punishment for acts of blasphemy, raises several questions about religious freedom, minority rights, and the direction of secular democracy in India. Selective Protection of Religious Texts The bill reportedly offers protection only to the Guru Granth Sahib, without extending similar respect to sacred texts of #Hindus, #Christians, or other faiths. This selective framing has been criticized as discriminatory and divisive in a multi-faith state like Punjab. Death Penalty for Blasphemy The introduction of the death sentence for blasphemy is alarming and mirrors Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, which have been widely condemned by international human rights organizations and the United Nations. #India has historically steered clear of such extreme punishments in the name of religious insult, valuing freedom of speech under its Constitution. Historical Precedents of Mob Violence Punjab has witnessed mob lynchings and killings inside Gurudwaras by #Sikhs over alleged acts of desecration or “beadbi.” Critics argue this law could legitimize vigilante justice and embolden extremist elements, leading to more extrajudicial killings. Targeting of Minorities Hindus fear the law will disproportionately affect Hindus, Christians, and Dalits, who have historically been vulnerable to communal tensions in the region. We Hindus believe , it as a tool for majoritarian dominance disguised as religious respect. Echoes of the Taliban and Pakistan The bill draws comparisons to Taliban-style governance and Pakistan's misuse of blasphemy laws to persecute religious minorities. Even the UN has condemned Pakistan's blasphemy laws for violating basic human rights. The fact that similar legislation is now entering Indian territory is being seen as a serious set back. Violation of Constitutional Values Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, subject to reasonable restrictions — not death penalties. This bill threatens the foundational principles of #IndianDemocracy and raises fears of a theocratic tilt in a secular state. Political and Social Fallout The move is being interpreted as a political stunt to appease religious hardliners, especially after the farmer protests where a Dalit Hindu man was brutally killed and hung over false blasphemy allegations. As a Hindu ,we warn it may ignite communal disharmony and encourage a culture of religious policing. This bill says it protects religious feelings, but it actually creates a dangerous situation. When a book is seen as more important than a person’s life, when people are scared to speak, and when laws are made based on one-sided anger, democracy starts to break down. The people of Punjab — and all of India — need to ask themselves: Is this real justice, or is it just misuse of religion in the name of devotion? #India #pmoindia #BharatKiBaatOnABP #AajTakSocial #News18Punjab #navbharatlive Partap Singh Bajwa Ashwani Sharma (मोदी का परिवार) AAP Punjab BJP Punjab
3:49

#BlasphemyBill Passed in #Punjab: A Step Toward Religious Intolerance? On July 15, 2025, the Punjab Legislative Assembly, under the leadership of Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann(Bhagwant Mann ) and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP ), passed a controversial Blasphemy Bill that has sparked intense public outcry and fears among minority communities. The bill, which mandates capital punishment for acts of blasphemy, raises several questions about religious freedom, minority rights, and the direction of secular democracy in India. Selective Protection of Religious Texts The bill reportedly offers protection only to the Guru Granth Sahib, without extending similar respect to sacred texts of #Hindus, #Christians, or other faiths. This selective framing has been criticized as discriminatory and divisive in a multi-faith state like Punjab. Death Penalty for Blasphemy The introduction of the death sentence for blasphemy is alarming and mirrors Pakistan’s blasphemy laws, which have been widely condemned by international human rights organizations and the United Nations. #India has historically steered clear of such extreme punishments in the name of religious insult, valuing freedom of speech under its Constitution. Historical Precedents of Mob Violence Punjab has witnessed mob lynchings and killings inside Gurudwaras by #Sikhs over alleged acts of desecration or “beadbi.” Critics argue this law could legitimize vigilante justice and embolden extremist elements, leading to more extrajudicial killings. Targeting of Minorities Hindus fear the law will disproportionately affect Hindus, Christians, and Dalits, who have historically been vulnerable to communal tensions in the region. We Hindus believe , it as a tool for majoritarian dominance disguised as religious respect. Echoes of the Taliban and Pakistan The bill draws comparisons to Taliban-style governance and Pakistan's misuse of blasphemy laws to persecute religious minorities. Even the UN has condemned Pakistan's blasphemy laws for violating basic human rights. The fact that similar legislation is now entering Indian territory is being seen as a serious set back. Violation of Constitutional Values Article 19 of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, subject to reasonable restrictions — not death penalties. This bill threatens the foundational principles of #IndianDemocracy and raises fears of a theocratic tilt in a secular state. Political and Social Fallout The move is being interpreted as a political stunt to appease religious hardliners, especially after the farmer protests where a Dalit Hindu man was brutally killed and hung over false blasphemy allegations. As a Hindu ,we warn it may ignite communal disharmony and encourage a culture of religious policing. This bill says it protects religious feelings, but it actually creates a dangerous situation. When a book is seen as more important than a person’s life, when people are scared to speak, and when laws are made based on one-sided anger, democracy starts to break down. The people of Punjab — and all of India — need to ask themselves: Is this real justice, or is it just misuse of religion in the name of devotion? #India #pmoindia #BharatKiBaatOnABP #AajTakSocial #News18Punjab #navbharatlive Partap Singh Bajwa Ashwani Sharma (मोदी का परिवार) AAP Punjab BJP Punjab

Ravinder Rana(Kshatriya)(Better Hindu)

68,408 просмотров • 1 год назад

OpenAI and Palantir are so terrified of this guy, they're spending millions to destroy him. There's a Democrat running for Congress in New York's 12th District named Alex Bores. Never heard of him? Well that's the point. 3 year state assemblyman. 30 bills passed. Co-author of the RAISE Act, the first real AI safety law in any major state. Soft bill. Basic transparency. Safety plans. Incident reporting. And for that, the AI industry has declared WAR on him. A Super PAC called Leading the Future has already dumped $2.5 million into destroying his campaign. Funded by Joe Lonsdale (Palantir co-founder), Greg Brockman (OpenAI co-founder), and Andreessen Horowitz. They've said they may spend up to $10 million. For a single House seat. But the money isn't the crazy part... The crazy part is what they've said OUT LOUD about why: They're trying to make him SUFFER so publicly that every future politician who even THINKS about regulating AI runs the other way. Bores' exact words: "They want to beat up on me so bad that when the idea of regulating AI comes up in the future, politicians run the other way." This is literally political deterrence. Terrorize one guy so brutally that Congress learns the lesson: Touch AI, end your career. Now here's where it gets really insane: Their main attack line is that Bores worked at Palantir "building ICE tech." And who funds the attacks? Joe Lonsdale. Palantir co-founder. The man who profits from ICE contracts is spending millions to attack a candidate for… once working at Palantir. But Bores QUIT Palantir in 2019 because executives refused to put anti-deportation guardrails into their ICE contracts after Trump's first election. He pushed internally. They said no. He walked. So the billionaire who funds deportation tech is spending millions to smear a candidate for working on deportation tech that the candidate actually tried to stop. You cannot make this up. And the question everyone should ask is: Why THIS guy? Bores isn't a radical. He's not anti-AI. Not Bernie Sanders. He's a moderate Democrat with a CS degree who passed the softest possible AI bill. Which is EXACTLY why Palantir and OpenAI are terrified of him. Because he proved something dangerous: You can actually pass AI regulation. It's not impossible. You just need one competent legislator who understands the tech and refuses to back down. Multiply that by 50 states and AI companies lose control forever. So they're not just attacking Bores the candidate. They're attacking the PROOF that AI regulation is possible. And they're doing it while OpenAI quietly publishes policy documents that ADMIT most of Bores' proposed regulations are reasonable. Third-party audits? They agree. Red-teaming? They agree. Kid safety provisions? They agree. They don't disagree with the substance. They disagree with the TIMING. They want regulation to come AFTER they've bought enough political power to write it themselves. That's what $2.5 million to destroy one assemblyman actually buys. Not an election. But a warning to every politician watching: If a first-term legislator with a soft bill can get buried under $10 million of attack ads, imagine what we'll do to you if you try to pass a real one. This is how industries capture democracy. With FEAR. And it's working. Members of Congress are already telling Bores in private: "We're watching this race. We want to see if this is an issue you can win on, or if money just swamps everything." Which basically means: Tell us if we're allowed to legislate on this. The crypto industry ran this exact playbook in 2024 through Fairshake. Hundreds of millions spent. Anti-crypto candidates destroyed. Congress rewritten. Now AI is running it at 10x the scale. Leading the Future: $125M raised. AI companies: $300M+ committed to the 2026 midterms. More than crypto spent in the ENTIRE 2024 cycle. All on one principle: Don't debate your critics. Destroy them so publicly nobody else dares become one. Palantir isn't scared of losing a House seat. OpenAI isn't scared of one guy's bill. They're scared of PRECEDENT. Because if Bores wins, the lesson Congress learns is that you CAN take on AI and survive. And that's the one lesson the industry can never afford them to learn. What's your take on this?
2:45

OpenAI and Palantir are so terrified of this guy, they're spending millions to destroy him. There's a Democrat running for Congress in New York's 12th District named Alex Bores. Never heard of him? Well that's the point. 3 year state assemblyman. 30 bills passed. Co-author of the RAISE Act, the first real AI safety law in any major state. Soft bill. Basic transparency. Safety plans. Incident reporting. And for that, the AI industry has declared WAR on him. A Super PAC called Leading the Future has already dumped $2.5 million into destroying his campaign. Funded by Joe Lonsdale (Palantir co-founder), Greg Brockman (OpenAI co-founder), and Andreessen Horowitz. They've said they may spend up to $10 million. For a single House seat. But the money isn't the crazy part... The crazy part is what they've said OUT LOUD about why: They're trying to make him SUFFER so publicly that every future politician who even THINKS about regulating AI runs the other way. Bores' exact words: "They want to beat up on me so bad that when the idea of regulating AI comes up in the future, politicians run the other way." This is literally political deterrence. Terrorize one guy so brutally that Congress learns the lesson: Touch AI, end your career. Now here's where it gets really insane: Their main attack line is that Bores worked at Palantir "building ICE tech." And who funds the attacks? Joe Lonsdale. Palantir co-founder. The man who profits from ICE contracts is spending millions to attack a candidate for… once working at Palantir. But Bores QUIT Palantir in 2019 because executives refused to put anti-deportation guardrails into their ICE contracts after Trump's first election. He pushed internally. They said no. He walked. So the billionaire who funds deportation tech is spending millions to smear a candidate for working on deportation tech that the candidate actually tried to stop. You cannot make this up. And the question everyone should ask is: Why THIS guy? Bores isn't a radical. He's not anti-AI. Not Bernie Sanders. He's a moderate Democrat with a CS degree who passed the softest possible AI bill. Which is EXACTLY why Palantir and OpenAI are terrified of him. Because he proved something dangerous: You can actually pass AI regulation. It's not impossible. You just need one competent legislator who understands the tech and refuses to back down. Multiply that by 50 states and AI companies lose control forever. So they're not just attacking Bores the candidate. They're attacking the PROOF that AI regulation is possible. And they're doing it while OpenAI quietly publishes policy documents that ADMIT most of Bores' proposed regulations are reasonable. Third-party audits? They agree. Red-teaming? They agree. Kid safety provisions? They agree. They don't disagree with the substance. They disagree with the TIMING. They want regulation to come AFTER they've bought enough political power to write it themselves. That's what $2.5 million to destroy one assemblyman actually buys. Not an election. But a warning to every politician watching: If a first-term legislator with a soft bill can get buried under $10 million of attack ads, imagine what we'll do to you if you try to pass a real one. This is how industries capture democracy. With FEAR. And it's working. Members of Congress are already telling Bores in private: "We're watching this race. We want to see if this is an issue you can win on, or if money just swamps everything." Which basically means: Tell us if we're allowed to legislate on this. The crypto industry ran this exact playbook in 2024 through Fairshake. Hundreds of millions spent. Anti-crypto candidates destroyed. Congress rewritten. Now AI is running it at 10x the scale. Leading the Future: $125M raised. AI companies: $300M+ committed to the 2026 midterms. More than crypto spent in the ENTIRE 2024 cycle. All on one principle: Don't debate your critics. Destroy them so publicly nobody else dares become one. Palantir isn't scared of losing a House seat. OpenAI isn't scared of one guy's bill. They're scared of PRECEDENT. Because if Bores wins, the lesson Congress learns is that you CAN take on AI and survive. And that's the one lesson the industry can never afford them to learn. What's your take on this?

Ricardo

95,661 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад