Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

UPDATE: The state completely dropped the charges against Dillon Webb, admitting his First Amendment rights were rock-solid. But when he sued for false arrest, the system protected its own. A federal judge dismissed the case, granting the deputy "qualified immunity" because of a legal technicality. Dillon won his freedom,... show more

Desiree

236,883 subscribers

278,695 views • 16 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Nicholas County Sheriff’s deputy arrests man for laughing. Deputy J.D. Ellison of Nicholas County Sheriff’s Department Conducted a traffic stop on William Lannacone for flashing his headlights to warn others about a speed trap. During the stop the deputy issued a citations for flashing his headlights and unsigned registration card. He next claimed the unsigned card was a jailable offense up to 6 months. William laughed at the statement of being arrested for an unsigned registration card and out came the cuffs. I'm the end the deputy released William as he found out his reason for detaining Williams was not valid. The citations that were given were later dismissed. The driver sued for First Amendment retaliation and won a major victory in court recently when a judge denied the officer's qualified immunity. The court basically confirmed: You can’t arrest someone just because they hurt your feelings or laughed at your legal "advice."

Nicholas County Sheriff’s deputy arrests man for laughing. Deputy J.D. Ellison of Nicholas County Sheriff’s Department Conducted a traffic stop on William Lannacone for flashing his headlights to warn others about a speed trap. During the stop the deputy issued a citations for flashing his headlights and unsigned registration card. He next claimed the unsigned card was a jailable offense up to 6 months. William laughed at the statement of being arrested for an unsigned registration card and out came the cuffs. I'm the end the deputy released William as he found out his reason for detaining Williams was not valid. The citations that were given were later dismissed. The driver sued for First Amendment retaliation and won a major victory in court recently when a judge denied the officer's qualified immunity. The court basically confirmed: You can’t arrest someone just because they hurt your feelings or laughed at your legal "advice."

Giggling Ganon

30,574 views • 2 months ago

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Guy gets pulled over by tyrant officer knows his rights and unloads on the officer. A Lake County Sheriff’s deputy decided to initiate a traffic stop, he clearly wasn’t expecting a driver who actually knew the law and was prepared to push back. Once the stop was in full swing, the driver challenged the deputy as to what the reason was for the stop. The mental gymnastics this deputy went through to try and justify the stop is mind boggling. As the confrontation continued to unfold, the truth slipped out—the deputy admitted the stop happened because the driver flipped him off while driving down the road. Realizing that a middle finger is completely protected under the First Amendment, the officer immediately shifted gears and claimed the stop was for "speeding." The driver wasn't having it. He immediately called out the lie, pointing out that he had a dashcam running with real-time GPS tracking to prove his exact speed. When an officer pulls you over out of pure retaliation and then reaches for a generic traffic violation to cover his tracks, that isn't law enforcement—it's tyranny. Knowing his rights, the driver initially refused to hand over his license and registration for an unlawful stop. He correctly challenged the deputy to name a legitimate, articulable crime that had been committed. "Failure to identify" cannot be used as a primary excuse to demand paperwork when the initial stop itself lacks probable cause. Unfortunately, when tyrants don't get immediate submission, they escalate. Instead of producing a radar reading or admitting he had no case, the deputy resorted to state-sanctioned extortion, threatening the driver with an immediate arrest just for exercising his right to question the stop. To avoid being falsely locked up, the driver handed over his ID under explicit "threat of arrest." The power trip didn't stop there. Because the driver dared to speak up, the deputy called in a full "Code 3" emergency backup response. Multiple units rolled up with lights flashing—wasting tax dollars and staging a massive show of force over a completely fabricated speeding allegation. To cap off the entire abuse of power, the deputy realized he was losing the legal argument on camera, so he resorted to a petty personal attack. He demanded to know if the truck was a commercial vehicle and threatened to call the driver's employer to get him in trouble at work. This driver did exactly what more citizens need to do: he kept his camera rolling, documented the badge number, and made it clear that threats of litigation are coming. When officers think they can write retaliatory tickets just because their egos are bruised, they need to be held accountable in a court of law. In my opinion this is a textbook example of a roadside fishing expedition where an officer got his feelings hurt, abused his authority, and scrambled to invent a crime after the fact.

Giggling Ganon

76,439 views • 7 days ago

This is how you educate officers that clearly do not understand the law or their job. As the conversation goes on you can see the the male officer realizes he is wrong but instead of taking the L he tries to double down on his error but in the end is forced to do that walk of shame. COEUR D’ALENE, IDAHO — Public Rights vs. State Property: First Amendment Auditor Threatened with Arrest for Obstructing Outside State-Run Liquor Store. What happens when a state-run business tries to trespass a citizen from public property for filming? This intense confrontation breaks down the exact legal battleground between a First Amendment auditor and the Coeur d'Alene Police Department. The videographer was standing on the sidewalk outside a state-owned and operated liquor store, exercising his right to film and take photographs. Taking issue with being recorded, a store employee confronted the auditor and requested he leave. When the auditor refused—maintaining he was on public property—management called law enforcement to issue a formal trespass warning. When Officer J. Chaffin and Officer C. Ziegler arrived on the scene, a massive constitutional debate unfolded: The Auditor’s Stance: Because the liquor store is a state-owned entity, the surrounding property and sidewalks are publicly funded, open spaces. He argues that citizens cannot be trespassed from public property unless they are actively committing a crime, asserting his 1st Amendment right to record and 4th Amendment right against unlawful seizure. The Police Stance: Officers countered that even though the business is state-run, it functions as a commercial space open for public commerce. They argued that management retains the right to refuse service and remove individuals deemed disruptive, and that refusing to leave constitutes criminal trespass. The ID Demand: Officer Chaffin demands the auditor’s identification, explicitly stating that failure to comply will result in an immediate arrest for obstructing and resisting. Qualified Immunity Threatened: While complying under the threat of arrest, the auditor fires back, telling Officer Ziegler that the department is violating his constitutional rights and that they will face a personal lawsuit and lose their qualified immunity. The "Hypothetical" Stand-off: Officer Ziegler attempts to use hypothetical scenarios to justify the trespass order, but the auditor shuts it down, demanding they stick to the reality: he was standing 20 to 30 feet away, completely peaceful, minding his own business. Ultimately, the officers documented his information, issued the official trespass warning, and walked away without making an arrest—leaving the auditor to give them a parting shot as they drove off.

This is how you educate officers that clearly do not understand the law or their job. As the conversation goes on you can see the the male officer realizes he is wrong but instead of taking the L he tries to double down on his error but in the end is forced to do that walk of shame. COEUR D’ALENE, IDAHO — Public Rights vs. State Property: First Amendment Auditor Threatened with Arrest for Obstructing Outside State-Run Liquor Store. What happens when a state-run business tries to trespass a citizen from public property for filming? This intense confrontation breaks down the exact legal battleground between a First Amendment auditor and the Coeur d'Alene Police Department. The videographer was standing on the sidewalk outside a state-owned and operated liquor store, exercising his right to film and take photographs. Taking issue with being recorded, a store employee confronted the auditor and requested he leave. When the auditor refused—maintaining he was on public property—management called law enforcement to issue a formal trespass warning. When Officer J. Chaffin and Officer C. Ziegler arrived on the scene, a massive constitutional debate unfolded: The Auditor’s Stance: Because the liquor store is a state-owned entity, the surrounding property and sidewalks are publicly funded, open spaces. He argues that citizens cannot be trespassed from public property unless they are actively committing a crime, asserting his 1st Amendment right to record and 4th Amendment right against unlawful seizure. The Police Stance: Officers countered that even though the business is state-run, it functions as a commercial space open for public commerce. They argued that management retains the right to refuse service and remove individuals deemed disruptive, and that refusing to leave constitutes criminal trespass. The ID Demand: Officer Chaffin demands the auditor’s identification, explicitly stating that failure to comply will result in an immediate arrest for obstructing and resisting. Qualified Immunity Threatened: While complying under the threat of arrest, the auditor fires back, telling Officer Ziegler that the department is violating his constitutional rights and that they will face a personal lawsuit and lose their qualified immunity. The "Hypothetical" Stand-off: Officer Ziegler attempts to use hypothetical scenarios to justify the trespass order, but the auditor shuts it down, demanding they stick to the reality: he was standing 20 to 30 feet away, completely peaceful, minding his own business. Ultimately, the officers documented his information, issued the official trespass warning, and walked away without making an arrest—leaving the auditor to give them a parting shot as they drove off.

Giggling Ganon

64,604 views • 27 days ago

An 80-year-old man with Parkinson's disease arrested for trespassing on his own property by incompetent officers... Here is the full backstory behind the encounter: The entire incident centered around a civil disagreement over property rights. According to Volusia County property appraiser records and mortgage statements, Edward Bowman is a rightful owner of the home and property, and he actively pays the mortgage on it. His stepdaughter also shares ownership rights to the home and property. A tenant living in a mother-in-law suite situated behind the main house called the police to report that Bowman and his stepdaughter were trespassing. The tenant claimed that Bowman lived on the property but did not own the specific house they were entering, arguing they had no right to be there. When Orange City Police officers arrived, the stepdaughter tried to explain that she had already spoken with a deputy earlier that morning who confirmed the situation was a civil property matter. However, the responding officers refused to listen to her explanation, giving her and Bowman a single warning to leave or face arrest. The Stepdaughter's Arrest: Officers arrested her for trespass. Despite her name being on the property appraiser site, police also attempted to charge her with possession of a firearm while trespassing because she had a licensed firearm in her pocket. Edward Bowman's Arrest: Despite Bowman explicitly stating, "This is my property," officers still handcuffed him and arrested him for trespassing. The city manager and the chief of police launched a formal review of the circumstances surrounding the incident. The Stepdaughter: All criminal charges against her were subsequently dropped after legal review confirmed her ownership status. Edward Bowman: Despite the property records proving his ownership, the police department pursued charges against him for trespass and resisting an officer without violence. The police officers also claimed that Edward had a$saulted them. Current Legal Status: Edward Bowan’s case remains active in the court system. His family and legal team are actively fighting the system and working to get the remaining charges completely dropped. While the state attorney's office ultimately dismissed the case against his stepdaughter, they have not yet formally dismissed the resisting charges against Bowman. The defense is heavily leveraging the property deeds and the video evidence—which shows his severe physical limitations—to pressure the state into throwing out the case.

An 80-year-old man with Parkinson's disease arrested for trespassing on his own property by incompetent officers... Here is the full backstory behind the encounter: The entire incident centered around a civil disagreement over property rights. According to Volusia County property appraiser records and mortgage statements, Edward Bowman is a rightful owner of the home and property, and he actively pays the mortgage on it. His stepdaughter also shares ownership rights to the home and property. A tenant living in a mother-in-law suite situated behind the main house called the police to report that Bowman and his stepdaughter were trespassing. The tenant claimed that Bowman lived on the property but did not own the specific house they were entering, arguing they had no right to be there. When Orange City Police officers arrived, the stepdaughter tried to explain that she had already spoken with a deputy earlier that morning who confirmed the situation was a civil property matter. However, the responding officers refused to listen to her explanation, giving her and Bowman a single warning to leave or face arrest. The Stepdaughter's Arrest: Officers arrested her for trespass. Despite her name being on the property appraiser site, police also attempted to charge her with possession of a firearm while trespassing because she had a licensed firearm in her pocket. Edward Bowman's Arrest: Despite Bowman explicitly stating, "This is my property," officers still handcuffed him and arrested him for trespassing. The city manager and the chief of police launched a formal review of the circumstances surrounding the incident. The Stepdaughter: All criminal charges against her were subsequently dropped after legal review confirmed her ownership status. Edward Bowman: Despite the property records proving his ownership, the police department pursued charges against him for trespass and resisting an officer without violence. The police officers also claimed that Edward had a$saulted them. Current Legal Status: Edward Bowan’s case remains active in the court system. His family and legal team are actively fighting the system and working to get the remaining charges completely dropped. While the state attorney's office ultimately dismissed the case against his stepdaughter, they have not yet formally dismissed the resisting charges against Bowman. The defense is heavily leveraging the property deeds and the video evidence—which shows his severe physical limitations—to pressure the state into throwing out the case.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

36,077 views • 21 days ago

The second amendment guarantees the right to a militia to guard against federal tyranny. But if a president can use that force against its own state, against the wishes of that state, then it is no militia at all and a clear violation of the second amendment.

The second amendment guarantees the right to a militia to guard against federal tyranny. But if a president can use that force against its own state, against the wishes of that state, then it is no militia at all and a clear violation of the second amendment.

Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦

827,885 views • 10 months ago

In Edmonton, a man was pulled over by police because his SUV had an illegal license plate cover. During the stop, officers saw a pill bottle with drugs and later found a loaded handgun on him. He was arrested and charged with several gun and drug offences. But when the case went to court, the judge threw out all the evidence, saying the police didn’t have solid legal grounds to arrest him in the first place. Even though the judge admitted Khan’s story didn’t make sense and the loaded gun was a serious threat, he ruled that police violated Khan’s rights, so none of the evidence could be used. That meant all charges were dropped. This case shows how someone caught with a loaded gun and drugs can walk free if the court decides police didn’t follow the exact legal steps. It’s a clear example of why people are frustrated with Canada’s justice system, the rules meant to protect rights sometimes end up protecting criminals more than the public. Visit to subscribe and stay informed. Don’t miss the stories that matter. Juno News

In Edmonton, a man was pulled over by police because his SUV had an illegal license plate cover. During the stop, officers saw a pill bottle with drugs and later found a loaded handgun on him. He was arrested and charged with several gun and drug offences. But when the case went to court, the judge threw out all the evidence, saying the police didn’t have solid legal grounds to arrest him in the first place. Even though the judge admitted Khan’s story didn’t make sense and the loaded gun was a serious threat, he ruled that police violated Khan’s rights, so none of the evidence could be used. That meant all charges were dropped. This case shows how someone caught with a loaded gun and drugs can walk free if the court decides police didn’t follow the exact legal steps. It’s a clear example of why people are frustrated with Canada’s justice system, the rules meant to protect rights sometimes end up protecting criminals more than the public. Visit to subscribe and stay informed. Don’t miss the stories that matter. Juno News

Ron Chhinzer

73,370 views • 11 months ago

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.

Tyrant officer gets schooled on 4th amendment and what private property is. He does the walk of shame with nothing to say. This Yolo County Sheriff's Deputy learned the hard way that stepping onto private property without your facts straight can lead to a masterclass in constitutional rights—and a legendary chewing out! Watch this standoff unfolds between a homeowner and a Yolo County Deputy (Badge #160) who decided to roll up onto land he wasn't invited on. The officer claimed he was investigating a suspicious vehicle at a home under construction, demanding that the man inside identify himself. But this homeowner wasn't having any of it. He immediately flipped the script on the deputy, pointing out the absolute lack of legal ground the officer was standing on. Nobody called 911 to have this man checked on, nobody reported a crime, and the deputy had zero confirmation of who actually owned the property before demanding ID. The property owner stood his ground, completely shutting down the officer's overreach by demanding he get off the land instead. Once the homeowner stepped out of his vehicle and firmly established that it was his land, the deputy realized he had absolutely nothing to hold him on. With his investigation completely dismantled, the officer was forced to turn around and walk back to his cruiser. To top it all off, the property owner sent him packing with a high-energy, unforgettable tirade, capping it all off by shouting that his intense vibe was fueled by nothing more than "500 calories of M&Ms, dude!" This is text book 101 of how to stand up for your rights when you have an officer that has overreached to this level. Dude went scorched the earth on this deputy.

Giggling Ganon

48,840 views • 11 days ago

BREAKING: Judge Chutkan rejected Trump's motion to dismiss his criminal charges based on a claim of "presidential immunity” on the same day a federal appeals court ruled that the former president can be sued for inciting the insurrection.

BREAKING: Judge Chutkan rejected Trump's motion to dismiss his criminal charges based on a claim of "presidential immunity” on the same day a federal appeals court ruled that the former president can be sued for inciting the insurrection.

All In with Chris Hayes

119,626 views • 2 years ago

Why is the government blackmailing its own MPs to pass emergency legislation? Labour MP Karl Turner has just exposed a massive government cover-up regarding the UK justice system. The state is planning to scrap the right to a jury trial for most offences, blaming a court backlog. But Turner reveals that up to 20% of courtrooms sit completely empty because of funding failures. When he tried to warn the public, party enforcers briefed the press that he was mentally unstable and threatened his private life. You are losing your fundamental legal rights just to cover up a Whitehall failure. 🤬

Why is the government blackmailing its own MPs to pass emergency legislation? Labour MP Karl Turner has just exposed a massive government cover-up regarding the UK justice system. The state is planning to scrap the right to a jury trial for most offences, blaming a court backlog. But Turner reveals that up to 20% of courtrooms sit completely empty because of funding failures. When he tried to warn the public, party enforcers briefed the press that he was mentally unstable and threatened his private life. You are losing your fundamental legal rights just to cover up a Whitehall failure. 🤬

🤍𝕁𝕆🤍

22,179 views • 2 months ago

DEVELOPING | EFF Free State Deputy Chairperson, Thomas Macingwane, has welcomed the arrest of an 80-year-old man for murder and defeating the ends of justice. He adds that police should now move to arrest the real killer, who is allegedly the grandson.

DEVELOPING | EFF Free State Deputy Chairperson, Thomas Macingwane, has welcomed the arrest of an 80-year-old man for murder and defeating the ends of justice. He adds that police should now move to arrest the real killer, who is allegedly the grandson.

SABC News

34,339 views • 9 months ago

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Your deputy is a threat to himself and others. All this officer cares about is trying to get the person in cuffs. Zero discovery, zero investigation, straight to litigation with this guy. This is the type of officer that you see on the news for discharging his firearm when he should not have. In this case, the man holding the camera cannot be trespassed from the property because he has lessors rights. If he is leasing property there he has the rights to be there. If the property manager wants him gone they need to not renew his lease at this point. That deputy can go kick rocks.

Giggling Ganon

30,366 views • 2 months ago

Sergeant arrested man for recording national guard armory. This incident occurred near the Hibbing National Guard Armory. The "story" behind this case is centered on a legal dispute over first amendment rights, refusing to ID, and the definition of Obstruction. Sgt. Everett detained the camera man for filming the armory, citing "suspicious activity." When he refused to provide identification—arguing that filming from a public sidewalk is not a crime—the situation escalated into a physical arrest. The man was charged with Obstruction of Legal Process. However, a Minnesota court eventually dismissed the charges. The court found that Everett did not have "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that a crime was being committed. Merely filming a government building from a public space was deemed a protected First Amendment activity, and refusing to ID during an unlawful detention does not constitute obstruction in Minnesota. Upon release the camera man sued the Hibbing police department and won costing the citizens of that city 36,000 in their tax dollars. The sad part is the Hibbing PD has done nothing from a disciplinary standpoint to Sergeant Everett.

Sergeant arrested man for recording national guard armory. This incident occurred near the Hibbing National Guard Armory. The "story" behind this case is centered on a legal dispute over first amendment rights, refusing to ID, and the definition of Obstruction. Sgt. Everett detained the camera man for filming the armory, citing "suspicious activity." When he refused to provide identification—arguing that filming from a public sidewalk is not a crime—the situation escalated into a physical arrest. The man was charged with Obstruction of Legal Process. However, a Minnesota court eventually dismissed the charges. The court found that Everett did not have "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that a crime was being committed. Merely filming a government building from a public space was deemed a protected First Amendment activity, and refusing to ID during an unlawful detention does not constitute obstruction in Minnesota. Upon release the camera man sued the Hibbing police department and won costing the citizens of that city 36,000 in their tax dollars. The sad part is the Hibbing PD has done nothing from a disciplinary standpoint to Sergeant Everett.

Giggling Ganon

16,588 views • 2 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: A man accused of raping a 94-year-old woman in Baton Rouge has been arrested. He had prior arrests for rape, burglary, and unauthorized entry, but the charges were dismissed. 22-year-old Jeremiah Taylor was taken into custody after detectives released photos and received tips from the public identifying his location. Before Taylor was arrested in connection with the rape of the 94-year-old woman, a warrant was issued for his arrest on violation of protective order charges. According to the warrant, the victim had an order of protection against Taylor following his previous arrest for an August 2024 sexual battery and rape. Taylor was released from the East Baton Rouge Prison on Jan. 12 after the charges for that case were dismissed.

Sensitive content

🚨 BREAKING: A man accused of raping a 94-year-old woman in Baton Rouge has been arrested. He had prior arrests for rape, burglary, and unauthorized entry, but the charges were dismissed. 22-year-old Jeremiah Taylor was taken into custody after detectives released photos and received tips from the public identifying his location. Before Taylor was arrested in connection with the rape of the 94-year-old woman, a warrant was issued for his arrest on violation of protective order charges. According to the warrant, the victim had an order of protection against Taylor following his previous arrest for an August 2024 sexual battery and rape. Taylor was released from the East Baton Rouge Prison on Jan. 12 after the charges for that case were dismissed.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

38,475 views • 3 months ago

When George Farmer was arrested for his massive 2023 DUI, his blood alcohol content was a staggering 0.261, which is more than three times the legal limit! For a man his size, that means he literally had to consume roughly 10 to 13 alcoholic drinks before recklessly deciding to get behind the wheel of his truck. He was so insanely intoxicated that he completely totaled a massive, $150,000 RAM TRX 1500 truck, deploying the airbags and literally ripping 2 of the wheels right off the vehicle. Candace Owens Candace Owens lied and tried to pass this off as a “fender bender” and said the cops were never called, but her husband could have easily killed an innocent person driving that beast of a truck while completely blacked out on a green card! And yes, the police were called because George Farmer was arrested and I posted the alleged mugshot and arrest report to prove it.

When George Farmer was arrested for his massive 2023 DUI, his blood alcohol content was a staggering 0.261, which is more than three times the legal limit! For a man his size, that means he literally had to consume roughly 10 to 13 alcoholic drinks before recklessly deciding to get behind the wheel of his truck. He was so insanely intoxicated that he completely totaled a massive, $150,000 RAM TRX 1500 truck, deploying the airbags and literally ripping 2 of the wheels right off the vehicle. Candace Owens Candace Owens lied and tried to pass this off as a “fender bender” and said the cops were never called, but her husband could have easily killed an innocent person driving that beast of a truck while completely blacked out on a green card! And yes, the police were called because George Farmer was arrested and I posted the alleged mugshot and arrest report to prove it.

Laura Loomer

309,660 views • 1 month ago

This is the staff that obstructed the ICE officer on July 8 in Ontario, California, as he detained an illegal for deportation. Arrest and charge all of the obstructionists. Make a legal example of them. Nobody is above the law.

This is the staff that obstructed the ICE officer on July 8 in Ontario, California, as he detained an illegal for deportation. Arrest and charge all of the obstructionists. Make a legal example of them. Nobody is above the law.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

55,060 views • 11 months ago

It's video L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna calls "completely unacceptable." A mother is punched in the face by a deputy as she refuses to give up her baby during an arrest in #Palmdale. The new calls for the deputy to be charged. Tonight at 11 from ABC7

It's video L.A. County Sheriff Robert Luna calls "completely unacceptable." A mother is punched in the face by a deputy as she refuses to give up her baby during an arrest in #Palmdale. The new calls for the deputy to be charged. Tonight at 11 from ABC7

ABC7 Eyewitness News

297,426 views • 3 years ago

Arresting Don Lemon makes him the face of the First Amendment. TWO Black journalists were arrested for covering a protest, NOT for protesting. The First Amendment protects the press. To be clear — I believe houses of worship should be off limits. Protesting inside churches is wrong. But COVERING those protests as a member of the press is NOT. Frankly, his arrest should scare you. If the government tells reporters what protests they can cover, who they can quote, or when they can show up — that’s a problem. That’s not a free country. You don’t get to arrest accredited journalists because you don’t like the optics. Trump made it personal. Now the whole country is watching. Don Lemon — this is your moment. And everyone else in media should be proud to have your back.

Arresting Don Lemon makes him the face of the First Amendment. TWO Black journalists were arrested for covering a protest, NOT for protesting. The First Amendment protects the press. To be clear — I believe houses of worship should be off limits. Protesting inside churches is wrong. But COVERING those protests as a member of the press is NOT. Frankly, his arrest should scare you. If the government tells reporters what protests they can cover, who they can quote, or when they can show up — that’s a problem. That’s not a free country. You don’t get to arrest accredited journalists because you don’t like the optics. Trump made it personal. Now the whole country is watching. Don Lemon — this is your moment. And everyone else in media should be proud to have your back.

Van Jones

36,415 views • 4 months ago

YOUR REACTION: White man EXPLODES, claims plagiarism accusations against Claudine Gay were completely made up, and the American people got played by Bill Ackman, who is now defending his wife Neri Oxman for the same accusations. He provides what he claims is proof that the accusations were false and says that because most Americans (about 65 percent) do not have a college degree and have never done academic work, they were misled, especially because of their biases against black people. 'How can she be the first black president of Harvard after hundreds of years? She's a black woman and certainly not qualified; she probably cheated. It's probably a case of DEI,' he said, referring to people who never attended college but are often the first online experts—his words, not mine. WATCH

YOUR REACTION: White man EXPLODES, claims plagiarism accusations against Claudine Gay were completely made up, and the American people got played by Bill Ackman, who is now defending his wife Neri Oxman for the same accusations. He provides what he claims is proof that the accusations were false and says that because most Americans (about 65 percent) do not have a college degree and have never done academic work, they were misled, especially because of their biases against black people. 'How can she be the first black president of Harvard after hundreds of years? She's a black woman and certainly not qualified; she probably cheated. It's probably a case of DEI,' he said, referring to people who never attended college but are often the first online experts—his words, not mine. WATCH

Simon Ateba

328,287 views • 2 years ago

Here is a wild one. Riverside deputy Martin Huizar is called out to the residence of Adele Shirley on a noise complaint. One of the children in the house opened the door when the deputy knocked and immediately closed it once they saw the deputy. Deputy Huizar took it upon himself to open the door and enter the home. Once in the home Adele the home owner told him to leave as he does not have a warrant. The Deputy refuses claiming he owns her home since he is inside. Things escalate after Adele asks for a supervisor and the deputy grabs her and placed her under arrest. This is a classic violation of the 4th amendment good on Adele for standing her ground. The Deputy has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation. Adele has filed a civil suit against the county which is still on going with the last update in Nov 2025. No official word on trial, settlement, or the status of the charges brought on Adele by the deputy (which most likely will be dismissed.)

Here is a wild one. Riverside deputy Martin Huizar is called out to the residence of Adele Shirley on a noise complaint. One of the children in the house opened the door when the deputy knocked and immediately closed it once they saw the deputy. Deputy Huizar took it upon himself to open the door and enter the home. Once in the home Adele the home owner told him to leave as he does not have a warrant. The Deputy refuses claiming he owns her home since he is inside. Things escalate after Adele asks for a supervisor and the deputy grabs her and placed her under arrest. This is a classic violation of the 4th amendment good on Adele for standing her ground. The Deputy has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigation. Adele has filed a civil suit against the county which is still on going with the last update in Nov 2025. No official word on trial, settlement, or the status of the charges brought on Adele by the deputy (which most likely will be dismissed.)

Giggling Ganon

120,160 views • 2 months ago

A federal judge just dismissed Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch. The case: Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein. He sued to silence the reporting. The judge threw it out. $10 billion. Against his own ally’s media empire. To bury a story about Epstein. Think about what that tells you.

A federal judge just dismissed Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch. The case: Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein. He sued to silence the reporting. The judge threw it out. $10 billion. Against his own ally’s media empire. To bury a story about Epstein. Think about what that tells you.

Brian Allen

28,200 views • 2 months ago