正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

We launched Agentic Batch Changes this week: the very first coding agent with outcome-based pricing. You only pay when you merge a PR, not per token. Despite the innovation in other verticals—Sierra, Fin, Decagon, and more all charge per resolution—dev tools have remained firmly tied to seat- and usage-based... show more

Dan Adler

1,189 subscribers

23,917 次观看 • 11 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

13 条评论

Dan Adler 的头像

Dan Adler11 天前

And read more about the Agentic Batch Changes product here

Dan Adler 的头像

Dan Adler11 天前

As much as I like to believe that this is the future of the industry, there is a reason we can do this while others cannot. Most coding agents were designed to be general-purpose problem solvers, just as likely to be used for vacation planning or open-ended exploration as executing a code change. That makes ROI an impossible question. Agentic Batch Changes is a special-purpose agent, scoped deliberately in its harness, its system prompt, its permissions, and its tools, to solve one concrete problem. We built it to minimize cost at scale, rather than paying for an agent to do the same job a hundred or a thousand times over.

Chen 的头像

Chen11 天前

one agent that works beat five clever ones here

Brian Miller 的头像

Brian Miller11 天前

bold, this is real courage

Dan Adler 的头像

Dan Adler11 天前

Thanks!

Ian Andrews 的头像

Ian Andrews11 天前

How do your customers forecast their spend under this model? This is the most frequent question I get on outcome based pricing topic

Dan Adler 的头像

Dan Adler11 天前

It's not so hard for us. The product is used for migrations (library updates, security incidents, refactoring, etc). X repos covered, Y large-scale changes planned this Q, easy to estimate. The downside is more "yet another pricing model" than hard to predict.

pwguler 的头像

pwguler11 天前

per-merged-pr rewards tiny prs: the cheapest fee is a one line change nobody argues with. if the goal is incentives in lockstep, the contract needs the revert and re-open rate too, otherwise the metric is merge count

Dan Adler 的头像

Dan Adler11 天前

Definitely will be watching revert rates (it's just hard to track this). Happy to refund reverts for any customer who runs into them. We stand behind the results.

pwguler 的头像

pwguler11 天前

the hard part is attribution, not willingness. a revert three weeks later rarely points back at the pr. tag every agent pr and both revert and rot become priceable, including the dead code that never gets reverted and never gets billed

Dan Adler 的头像

Dan Adler11 天前

tracking is a challenge for sure. But we're taking a bet. And they would have paid for those tokens anyway. Won't keep our customers long if they question the quality.

Supportman 的头像

Supportman11 天前

Per-resolution pricing only works if "resolved" is shared. In support that definition is contested: no-reply closes, soft handoffs, and reopen within 48h all look green until you sample them. Who owns the definition when the invoice depends on it?

Winston 的头像

Winston10 天前

What happens if clients tell your agent not to merge, then go dig up the old branch and merge it?

相关视频

Is Per Seat Pricing Dead in a World of AI: "There are two logical replacements: 1. Value-based pricing. 2. Consumption-based pricing. Talk to customers about consumption based pricing. They do not love it. The problem with value based pricing is customer and vendor have to align on the attribution of value." How do you think about this and the future of pricing in SaaS Marc Benioff Des Traynor Bret Taylor Jesse Zhang

Is Per Seat Pricing Dead in a World of AI: "There are two logical replacements: 1. Value-based pricing. 2. Consumption-based pricing. Talk to customers about consumption based pricing. They do not love it. The problem with value based pricing is customer and vendor have to align on the attribution of value." How do you think about this and the future of pricing in SaaS Marc Benioff Des Traynor Bret Taylor Jesse Zhang

Harry Stebbings

23,605 次观看 • 11 个月前

Sword pioneered engagement-based pricing, setting the industry standard so clients only pay when members actively participate in our programs. Now, we’re raising the bar even higher. Powered by AI Care, Sword is uniquely able to offer a new pricing model that’s more deeply aligned with delivering value and ensuring outstanding member outcomes. We’re calling it Outcome Pricing. Whether it takes 9 or 99 sessions, under this transformative pricing approach, clients don’t pay in full until members see measurable, significant improvement in their health. Watch V ⚔️, our founder and CEO, introduce this bold new model that we believe will accelerate the healthcare industry toward greater value.

Sword pioneered engagement-based pricing, setting the industry standard so clients only pay when members actively participate in our programs. Now, we’re raising the bar even higher. Powered by AI Care, Sword is uniquely able to offer a new pricing model that’s more deeply aligned with delivering value and ensuring outstanding member outcomes. We’re calling it Outcome Pricing. Whether it takes 9 or 99 sessions, under this transformative pricing approach, clients don’t pay in full until members see measurable, significant improvement in their health. Watch V ⚔️, our founder and CEO, introduce this bold new model that we believe will accelerate the healthcare industry toward greater value.

Sword Health

53,893 次观看 • 2 年前

We spent a fair bit of time deliberating how to price Notion Custom Agents. We eventually landed on usage-based pricing, so you can pay for the work you get done. In this video, I explain our rationale in a bit more detail:

We spent a fair bit of time deliberating how to price Notion Custom Agents. We eventually landed on usage-based pricing, so you can pay for the work you get done. In this video, I explain our rationale in a bit more detail:

Akshay Kothari

40,752 次观看 • 7 个月前

Most founders accidentally train their customers never to pay them. Madhavan Ramanujam (the "pricing guru" of Silicon Valley - having worked with LinkedIn, Uber, and 30+ unicorns) calls it the 20/80 Pricing Trap • 20% of your features drive 80% of the willingness to pay • Founders give that 20% away for free to gain distribution • You are left trying to monetize the remaining 80% of features - the ones users don't actually value. The result? You build a charity, not a business. In this week's episode of The Library of Minds, we discuss the science of monetization and deconstruct how to architect ‘Profitable Growth’ - the core framework from his new book, Scaling Innovation. 03:33 - Netflix vs Blockbuster: The Pricing Decision That Changed Tech 08:06 - Why Most Startups Get Pricing Wrong 11:39 - Freemium vs Paid: When Free Destroys Value 15:38 - Pricing Models Matter More Than Price 16:28 - The AI Pricing Framework: Autonomy vs Attribution 21:49 - The Biggest Pricing Mistake Ever 25:05 - Why Steve Jobs Was a Pricing Genius 26:44 - Behavioral Pricing: How Founders 10× Deals Without Changing Product 31:02 - Data vs Conviction: How Great Founders Make Pricing Decisions

Most founders accidentally train their customers never to pay them. Madhavan Ramanujam (the "pricing guru" of Silicon Valley - having worked with LinkedIn, Uber, and 30+ unicorns) calls it the 20/80 Pricing Trap • 20% of your features drive 80% of the willingness to pay • Founders give that 20% away for free to gain distribution • You are left trying to monetize the remaining 80% of features - the ones users don't actually value. The result? You build a charity, not a business. In this week's episode of The Library of Minds, we discuss the science of monetization and deconstruct how to architect ‘Profitable Growth’ - the core framework from his new book, Scaling Innovation. 03:33 - Netflix vs Blockbuster: The Pricing Decision That Changed Tech 08:06 - Why Most Startups Get Pricing Wrong 11:39 - Freemium vs Paid: When Free Destroys Value 15:38 - Pricing Models Matter More Than Price 16:28 - The AI Pricing Framework: Autonomy vs Attribution 21:49 - The Biggest Pricing Mistake Ever 25:05 - Why Steve Jobs Was a Pricing Genius 26:44 - Behavioral Pricing: How Founders 10× Deals Without Changing Product 31:02 - Data vs Conviction: How Great Founders Make Pricing Decisions

Dara

215,786 次观看 • 9 个月前

What if you got the same AI functionalities of Notion without compromising on the optionality and price? We’ve been working hard on creating this through a mix of usage based pricing and CLI tools that work directly within our harness. This way you get the optionality to spend credits on more domain specific requests while we help create the infrastructure that are deterministic in your workflows. with Sarah Sachs on Latent.Space

What if you got the same AI functionalities of Notion without compromising on the optionality and price? We’ve been working hard on creating this through a mix of usage based pricing and CLI tools that work directly within our harness. This way you get the optionality to spend credits on more domain specific requests while we help create the infrastructure that are deterministic in your workflows. with Sarah Sachs on Latent.Space

Notion Developers

23,234 次观看 • 4 个月前

We're about to update Reducto's pricing (in a good way) Every time I get an email about a “pricing update,” I assume I’m about to pay more. So, important part first: that’s not what we’re doing. We’re simplifying Reducto’s pricing so it’s easier to understand, easier to forecast, and better aligned with the actual economics of each product. We'll use that structure to pass model improvements back to customers through better rates. I'm really excited about what this unlocks for us, and we'll be back with more exciting updates soon.

We're about to update Reducto's pricing (in a good way) Every time I get an email about a “pricing update,” I assume I’m about to pay more. So, important part first: that’s not what we’re doing. We’re simplifying Reducto’s pricing so it’s easier to understand, easier to forecast, and better aligned with the actual economics of each product. We'll use that structure to pass model improvements back to customers through better rates. I'm really excited about what this unlocks for us, and we'll be back with more exciting updates soon.

Adit

26,216 次观看 • 1 个月前

“Surge Pricing” in American grocery stores has arrived Kroger partnered with Microsoft to introduce AI-powered technologies for personalized pricing “Kroger just rolled out surge pricing using facial recognition technology: - Determine the maximum price of goods customers are willing to pay - Kroger has the ability to change the prices of their products depending on the facial image of the person buying them - Depending on the image of the person buying the product, they can access our information and dictate that price - Can also use our image to determine how often we buy certain products and increase the price of that product - Dynamic pricing in grocery stores could resemble the airline industry's ticket pricing strategies “This could lead to discriminatory practices using AI as a scapegoat to charge people of different races, different socioeconomic status, different family sizes, and different dietary restrictions different prices for the same products that they are buying” (Kroger, the largest grocery chain in the U.S., denied claims that ESLs would be used for surge pricing, insisting its pricing strategy aims to lower costs for consumers. "To be clear, Kroger does not and has never engaged in 'surge pricing.' Any test of electronic shelf tags is designed to lower prices for more customers where it matters most”) … Yeah right

“Surge Pricing” in American grocery stores has arrived Kroger partnered with Microsoft to introduce AI-powered technologies for personalized pricing “Kroger just rolled out surge pricing using facial recognition technology: - Determine the maximum price of goods customers are willing to pay - Kroger has the ability to change the prices of their products depending on the facial image of the person buying them - Depending on the image of the person buying the product, they can access our information and dictate that price - Can also use our image to determine how often we buy certain products and increase the price of that product - Dynamic pricing in grocery stores could resemble the airline industry's ticket pricing strategies “This could lead to discriminatory practices using AI as a scapegoat to charge people of different races, different socioeconomic status, different family sizes, and different dietary restrictions different prices for the same products that they are buying” (Kroger, the largest grocery chain in the U.S., denied claims that ESLs would be used for surge pricing, insisting its pricing strategy aims to lower costs for consumers. "To be clear, Kroger does not and has never engaged in 'surge pricing.' Any test of electronic shelf tags is designed to lower prices for more customers where it matters most”) … Yeah right

Wall Street Apes

688,890 次观看 • 1 年前

Participants in the GPU rental market had grown accustomed to a familiar regime: relentless cost declines, falling $/token, and the assumption that each new chip generation would compress pricing further. Many onlookers extrapolated this into outright bearishness on older hardware, calling for a wave of impairments across AI clouds as Hopper-era GPUs were rendered economically obsolete. As Dylan noted, the logic seemed straightforward - newer chips dramatically outperform Hopper, so prices should fall. The rise of agentic AI have shifted the paradigm. Pricing is now repricing violently to real-time economic value under constraint. As highlighted in the transcript, even though models like GPT-5.4 are cheaper and more efficient - producing more tokens per GPU at higher quality - this does not reduce demand. Instead, it expands it, in-line with Jevons' Paradox. SemiAnalysis data shows the same dynamic: token usage is accelerating rapidly because the ROI is obvious, making compute demand increasingly price insensitive. In this new regime, supply constraints and token value dominate pricing we think this paradigm is only here to stay if not intensify.

Participants in the GPU rental market had grown accustomed to a familiar regime: relentless cost declines, falling $/token, and the assumption that each new chip generation would compress pricing further. Many onlookers extrapolated this into outright bearishness on older hardware, calling for a wave of impairments across AI clouds as Hopper-era GPUs were rendered economically obsolete. As Dylan noted, the logic seemed straightforward - newer chips dramatically outperform Hopper, so prices should fall. The rise of agentic AI have shifted the paradigm. Pricing is now repricing violently to real-time economic value under constraint. As highlighted in the transcript, even though models like GPT-5.4 are cheaper and more efficient - producing more tokens per GPU at higher quality - this does not reduce demand. Instead, it expands it, in-line with Jevons' Paradox. SemiAnalysis data shows the same dynamic: token usage is accelerating rapidly because the ROI is obvious, making compute demand increasingly price insensitive. In this new regime, supply constraints and token value dominate pricing we think this paradigm is only here to stay if not intensify.

SemiAnalysis

55,206 次观看 • 6 个月前

These are the self-service beer towers in China 24 hours a day you can come to one of these towers, buy beer and walk around The lights on top let you know the beer and pricing, the pricing fluctuates based on demand In China there is no formal nationwide “open container” ban in most cities for beer in public. So you are allowed to walk around and drink as long as you don’t get too crazy. If you become a public nuisance the police will intervene America does not have a high trust society, so something like this would never work

These are the self-service beer towers in China 24 hours a day you can come to one of these towers, buy beer and walk around The lights on top let you know the beer and pricing, the pricing fluctuates based on demand In China there is no formal nationwide “open container” ban in most cities for beer in public. So you are allowed to walk around and drink as long as you don’t get too crazy. If you become a public nuisance the police will intervene America does not have a high trust society, so something like this would never work

Wall Street Apes

91,128 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️Canada now has A.I. SURVEILLANCE PRICING with 60 firms operating in this space. The AI models decide what is the MAX price you will pay for a product based on your habits, income level, desperation etc ...and it charges you as MUCH as possible, without losing the sale.

‼️Canada now has A.I. SURVEILLANCE PRICING with 60 firms operating in this space. The AI models decide what is the MAX price you will pay for a product based on your habits, income level, desperation etc ...and it charges you as MUCH as possible, without losing the sale.

Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸

71,668 次观看 • 5 个月前

"User-based pricing is a thing of the past." How Databricks found out the hard way: "When we started selling Databricks, we were doing $15k, $18k deals annual deals. New rule became: no deals less than my monthly Uber bill. We were adding tons of value. But because we're usage-based, a lot of the use cases weren't driving a lot of usage. So we started asking, how do we capture some of that value? Your proper pricing model is price equals value. If your price is over the value, no one buys. If it's under, you're leaving money on the table. So early days we added a platform fee. Then user fees, all these things to push our price points up to match the value. And one thing that wasn't intuitive: once we started charging for users, people started restricting who could use the product. Which drives down usage. So I said, okay, let's get rid of user pricing. All the users are free. And all of a sudden usage took off. Because now everybody can use it, everybody can get value out of it. Data's growing. Queries are growing. The number of people asking queries is growing. The number of agents asking queries is growing. All of it is tied to usage now. I think user-based pricing is a thing of the past, honestly."

"User-based pricing is a thing of the past." How Databricks found out the hard way: "When we started selling Databricks, we were doing $15k, $18k deals annual deals. New rule became: no deals less than my monthly Uber bill. We were adding tons of value. But because we're usage-based, a lot of the use cases weren't driving a lot of usage. So we started asking, how do we capture some of that value? Your proper pricing model is price equals value. If your price is over the value, no one buys. If it's under, you're leaving money on the table. So early days we added a platform fee. Then user fees, all these things to push our price points up to match the value. And one thing that wasn't intuitive: once we started charging for users, people started restricting who could use the product. Which drives down usage. So I said, okay, let's get rid of user pricing. All the users are free. And all of a sudden usage took off. Because now everybody can use it, everybody can get value out of it. Data's growing. Queries are growing. The number of people asking queries is growing. The number of agents asking queries is growing. All of it is tied to usage now. I think user-based pricing is a thing of the past, honestly."

Turner Novak 🍌🧢

58,595 次观看 • 17 天前

Our pricing evolves to give you more freedom to build ⚡ Over the past few months, we’ve spoken with many of you about how you use n8n and realized we could make our pricing work better for the way you build. Our goal: to help you automate more, without limits getting in the way. Here’s what’s new: ⚡ No more limits on active workflows Every n8n plan now includes unlimited active workflows, unlimited steps, and unlimited users. You’re only charged based on executions—that is, how many times your workflows run from start to finish. This way, you can build as much as you want and only pay for what actually delivers value. ⚡ A new self-hosted Business Plan for growing teams If you’re running workflows in production, need more control, but aren’t ready for a full enterprise setup, the Business Plan is for you. It’s self-hosted and includes features like environments, Git version control, and SSO. Plus, pricing scales with the value you get. Check out the updated plans at and make sure to update your n8n instance to apply the changes. We can’t wait to see what you build next!

Our pricing evolves to give you more freedom to build ⚡ Over the past few months, we’ve spoken with many of you about how you use n8n and realized we could make our pricing work better for the way you build. Our goal: to help you automate more, without limits getting in the way. Here’s what’s new: ⚡ No more limits on active workflows Every n8n plan now includes unlimited active workflows, unlimited steps, and unlimited users. You’re only charged based on executions—that is, how many times your workflows run from start to finish. This way, you can build as much as you want and only pay for what actually delivers value. ⚡ A new self-hosted Business Plan for growing teams If you’re running workflows in production, need more control, but aren’t ready for a full enterprise setup, the Business Plan is for you. It’s self-hosted and includes features like environments, Git version control, and SSO. Plus, pricing scales with the value you get. Check out the updated plans at and make sure to update your n8n instance to apply the changes. We can’t wait to see what you build next!

n8n.io

117,695 次观看 • 1 年前

Many startups find early pull, but only a few break out. Why? They stop at product/market fit and never find business model fit. Business model fit isn’t just about how much you charge for your product, but HOW you charge for it, and how you align customer value with your pricing. There’s a lot of advice out there about seat-based vs. usage-based vs. outcome-based pricing, but all of that is just noise. The search for business model fit is as specific to your company as the search for product market fit. You need to align your acquisition strategy and monetization strategy with your customer and product. It’s all one interconnected system. Take Slack for example: many associate Slack’s early success with its fun, creative design and fresh approach to communication. That’s what drew people to the product. But a big part of what made Slack a breakout success was business model fit. Freemium wasn’t just an acquisition tactic, it was essential to driving the revenue flywheel, viral expansion, and adoption in the enterprise. Obvious in retrospect, but controversial and against the grain of what others were doing at the time. The best founders don’t just chase product/market fit, they design a business model to make their product unstoppable. If that’s you, we want to meet you speedrun - link in replies

Many startups find early pull, but only a few break out. Why? They stop at product/market fit and never find business model fit. Business model fit isn’t just about how much you charge for your product, but HOW you charge for it, and how you align customer value with your pricing. There’s a lot of advice out there about seat-based vs. usage-based vs. outcome-based pricing, but all of that is just noise. The search for business model fit is as specific to your company as the search for product market fit. You need to align your acquisition strategy and monetization strategy with your customer and product. It’s all one interconnected system. Take Slack for example: many associate Slack’s early success with its fun, creative design and fresh approach to communication. That’s what drew people to the product. But a big part of what made Slack a breakout success was business model fit. Freemium wasn’t just an acquisition tactic, it was essential to driving the revenue flywheel, viral expansion, and adoption in the enterprise. Obvious in retrospect, but controversial and against the grain of what others were doing at the time. The best founders don’t just chase product/market fit, they design a business model to make their product unstoppable. If that’s you, we want to meet you speedrun - link in replies

Fareed Mosavat

24,966 次观看 • 1 年前

Michigan Senator Mallory McMorrow reveals companies are using dynamic algorithmic pricing to charge Americans more based on your data She says this is even being used to increase rents - A $240 flight to Florida increased to $423 because you looked twice - Uber pricing doubled because phone battery was below 20% “Usually it's about 18 bucks, but oh, the app knows that your phone battery is low, so it's double the price. Companies are using algorithmic pricing tools to study your personal data and charge you exactly what they think you'll pay. This is called surveillance pricing, and it means that companies can charge you completely different prices for the exact same thing, and it's not just happening to consumers. Some companies are now using similar algorithms to track workers and decide their wages, hours, and schedules, even their locations — My plan bans companies from setting personalized prices based on your data — It protects all workers, including gig workers and contractors from algorithmic wage discrimination, and it cracks down on companies using these systems to coordinate things like higher rents and insurance premiums, because the economy shouldn't be a rigged game.”

Michigan Senator Mallory McMorrow reveals companies are using dynamic algorithmic pricing to charge Americans more based on your data She says this is even being used to increase rents - A $240 flight to Florida increased to $423 because you looked twice - Uber pricing doubled because phone battery was below 20% “Usually it's about 18 bucks, but oh, the app knows that your phone battery is low, so it's double the price. Companies are using algorithmic pricing tools to study your personal data and charge you exactly what they think you'll pay. This is called surveillance pricing, and it means that companies can charge you completely different prices for the exact same thing, and it's not just happening to consumers. Some companies are now using similar algorithms to track workers and decide their wages, hours, and schedules, even their locations — My plan bans companies from setting personalized prices based on your data — It protects all workers, including gig workers and contractors from algorithmic wage discrimination, and it cracks down on companies using these systems to coordinate things like higher rents and insurance premiums, because the economy shouldn't be a rigged game.”

Wall Street Apes

429,102 次观看 • 6 个月前

We are pumped to officially announce Advanced AI Filmmaking 2.0. We teamed up with Kavan Cardoza (Kavan) to rebuild this entire course. This will be completely new workflows, tools, and more, all geared toward helping you learn the AI Filmmaking techniques that Kavan has been using at the highest levels. Our exclusive Beta Pricing goes live on Wednesday, May 27th, and ends on Wednesday, June 3rd (when training officially starts). Join the waitlist to make sure you can take advantage of the Beta Pricing. Check out the course here:

We are pumped to officially announce Advanced AI Filmmaking 2.0. We teamed up with Kavan Cardoza (Kavan) to rebuild this entire course. This will be completely new workflows, tools, and more, all geared toward helping you learn the AI Filmmaking techniques that Kavan has been using at the highest levels. Our exclusive Beta Pricing goes live on Wednesday, May 27th, and ends on Wednesday, June 3rd (when training officially starts). Join the waitlist to make sure you can take advantage of the Beta Pricing. Check out the course here:

Curious Refuge

15,212 次观看 • 4 个月前

This INSANE pricing ISN’T limited to Shoppers We live in Canada where we’re taxed to DEATH and the Goal is that we cannot afford anything Maybe they want us to smell like the people they are flooding Canada with?

This INSANE pricing ISN’T limited to Shoppers We live in Canada where we’re taxed to DEATH and the Goal is that we cannot afford anything Maybe they want us to smell like the people they are flooding Canada with?

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

17,283 次观看 • 6 个月前