正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

We were tracking 50+ campaigns manually. Viktor turned it into one report in minutes. We skipped a project coordinator hire. We're a 12-person team managing 140+ AI and tech creators. For months, campaign tracking meant someone on the team manually checking spreadsheets, chasing creators over DM, and pulling together... a status update before every client call. It worked, but it was the kind of work that quietly ate hours nobody had to spare. We tried solving it by splitting the work across the team. That just meant more people spending time on the same repetitive problem instead of one. Then we gave Viktor one job: own the campaign tracker. Pull status across all active campaigns, flag what's overdue, what's pending approval, what needs a payment follow-up, and what's coming up next. Post it directly into our Slack workspace before the week starts. Inside Slack, Viktor flagged overdue tasks, pending approvals, payment follow-ups, and upcoming deadlines. All from one report, posted directly into our workspace. Everything stayed read-only. Nothing was edited or sent without approval. The team stopped spending the first hour of every Monday piecing together what was happening across 50+ campaigns. That time went back to the work that actually moves clients forward. The teams still tracking this in spreadsheets are one missed deadline away from a client conversation they don't want to have. A copilot helps you work. An AI employee works when you don't. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #CreatorMarketing #CampaignOps Paid Partnershipshow more

Nova Reid

57,707 subscribers

103,724 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

We wanted to know if Viktor could own our outbound workflow, so we ran a one-week pilot. The result? An estimated 80.5 hours of manual prep replaced by 4.5 hours of team review. We're a digital marketing team managing outbound campaigns alongside client work, and one of the biggest bottlenecks has always been the prep. Researching prospects, writing personalized outreach, building follow-up sequences, and keeping everything organized takes far longer than most people realize. So instead of asking Viktor to help with one email, we asked him to own the workflow. During our pilot, Viktor handled prospect research, enrichment, personalized outreach, follow-up sequences, and campaign tracking for 100 target prospects. Our team's role was reduced to reviewing, approving, and managing replies before anything went out. What impressed us wasn't just the time savings. It was the consistency. Every prospect received the same level of research, the same quality of personalization, and a complete three-email sequence that was ready for review instead of being built manually from scratch. That's when we stopped thinking about AI as another writing tool. He's an AI employee that owns recurring work while keeping humans in control of the final decision. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #OutboundSales Paid Partnership

We wanted to know if Viktor could own our outbound workflow, so we ran a one-week pilot. The result? An estimated 80.5 hours of manual prep replaced by 4.5 hours of team review. We're a digital marketing team managing outbound campaigns alongside client work, and one of the biggest bottlenecks has always been the prep. Researching prospects, writing personalized outreach, building follow-up sequences, and keeping everything organized takes far longer than most people realize. So instead of asking Viktor to help with one email, we asked him to own the workflow. During our pilot, Viktor handled prospect research, enrichment, personalized outreach, follow-up sequences, and campaign tracking for 100 target prospects. Our team's role was reduced to reviewing, approving, and managing replies before anything went out. What impressed us wasn't just the time savings. It was the consistency. Every prospect received the same level of research, the same quality of personalization, and a complete three-email sequence that was ready for review instead of being built manually from scratch. That's when we stopped thinking about AI as another writing tool. He's an AI employee that owns recurring work while keeping humans in control of the final decision. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. #AIemployee #OutboundSales Paid Partnership

Kylie

76,240 次观看 • 2 个月前

$133,752 in new annual recurring revenue. 30 days. Zero new hires. That is the Authority Makers result. Here is what it looked like on our end. We run content and brand campaigns for multiple clients simultaneously. Outbound was always the thing that fell through the cracks. Not because we did not have the strategy. Because nobody had time to execute it every single day. We gave that job to Viktor. Week 1 we were not sure it would stick. The sequences felt generic and we almost went back to doing it manually. Then the replies started coming in. Viktor adjusted, followed up, and kept going whether we were online or not. By week 3 two new client conversations had opened from outbound that had been sitting untouched for months. One AI employee running the work nobody had time for. That is not a tool. That is a hire. Most execution gaps do not need a strategy. They need someone to show up every day. Hire Viktor for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first reply. Paid Partnership

Nawi

123,838 次观看 • 19 天前

Every AI tool claims it’ll save you time. Most just shift the workload somewhere else. Viktor is different ....it actually takes work off your plate. This week, I watched it work more like a real teammate than another chatbot sitting inside Slack. It understands context, takes ownership of tasks, and keeps things moving without constant instructions. That’s the real difference: you don’t just use Viktor. You delegate to it. Try Viktor for your team. Get $100 in credits with no card required. Full link in the first comment. Paid Partnership

Every AI tool claims it’ll save you time. Most just shift the workload somewhere else. Viktor is different ....it actually takes work off your plate. This week, I watched it work more like a real teammate than another chatbot sitting inside Slack. It understands context, takes ownership of tasks, and keeps things moving without constant instructions. That’s the real difference: you don’t just use Viktor. You delegate to it. Try Viktor for your team. Get $100 in credits with no card required. Full link in the first comment. Paid Partnership

LX™

87,475 次观看 • 29 天前

I just built a Claude Cowork skill that turns your Google Ads data into a visual performance dashboard in 60 seconds 🤯 One prompt → campaign breakdowns, CPA trends, spend vs conversions charts, and hourly conversion patterns, all rendered as an interactive HTML dashboard you open in Chrome. All inside Claude Cowork. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are pulling Google Ads data into spreadsheets every week, manually building charts, and spending an hour formatting a report that's outdated by the time you send it. If you're managing Google Ads and your weekly reporting workflow looks like this — export a CSV, open Google Sheets, build a pivot table, copy the numbers into a slide deck, manually create charts, format everything, realize you forgot a campaign, start over ... This skill does the whole thing in one prompt: → Connects to your live Google Ads data via MCP → Pulls spend, conversions, CPA, ROAS, CTR across every campaign → Builds an interactive HTML dashboard → Summary cards at the top: total spend, total conversions, avg CPA, avg ROAS → Bar chart comparing spend vs conversions by campaign → CPA trend line over the last 30 days → Campaign table ranked by performance, color-coded green/yellow/red → Opens in Chrome: hover over charts, compare campaigns, screenshot for your team No spreadsheets. No manual chart building. No hour-long formatting sessions. What you get: → A visual dashboard from live data in under 60 seconds → Campaign performance you can actually see, not just read in a table → CPA trends that show you where things are heading, not just where they are → A dashboard you can screenshot and drop into Slack, a client report, or a team standup → Reusable — run it weekly and the data updates automatically One prompt. Live data. A finished dashboard you open in your browser. I put together a playbook with the full skill file, the setup, and the exact prompts to customize the dashboard for your account. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "DASH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

I just built a Claude Cowork skill that turns your Google Ads data into a visual performance dashboard in 60 seconds 🤯 One prompt → campaign breakdowns, CPA trends, spend vs conversions charts, and hourly conversion patterns, all rendered as an interactive HTML dashboard you open in Chrome. All inside Claude Cowork. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are pulling Google Ads data into spreadsheets every week, manually building charts, and spending an hour formatting a report that's outdated by the time you send it. If you're managing Google Ads and your weekly reporting workflow looks like this — export a CSV, open Google Sheets, build a pivot table, copy the numbers into a slide deck, manually create charts, format everything, realize you forgot a campaign, start over ... This skill does the whole thing in one prompt: → Connects to your live Google Ads data via MCP → Pulls spend, conversions, CPA, ROAS, CTR across every campaign → Builds an interactive HTML dashboard → Summary cards at the top: total spend, total conversions, avg CPA, avg ROAS → Bar chart comparing spend vs conversions by campaign → CPA trend line over the last 30 days → Campaign table ranked by performance, color-coded green/yellow/red → Opens in Chrome: hover over charts, compare campaigns, screenshot for your team No spreadsheets. No manual chart building. No hour-long formatting sessions. What you get: → A visual dashboard from live data in under 60 seconds → Campaign performance you can actually see, not just read in a table → CPA trends that show you where things are heading, not just where they are → A dashboard you can screenshot and drop into Slack, a client report, or a team standup → Reusable — run it weekly and the data updates automatically One prompt. Live data. A finished dashboard you open in your browser. I put together a playbook with the full skill file, the setup, and the exact prompts to customize the dashboard for your account. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "DASH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

39,026 次观看 • 6 个月前

SOMEONE TURNED THEIR TEAM'S TASK TRACKER INTO A 3D ISLAND instead of a boring list of tasks, your teams work is a little island that grows as you get stuff done > you assign tasks right in slack, just type who its for, the points, and the due date > finish a task and you get to place a building on the island > get your work rejected and the building collapses into rubble > the rubble stays there forever, so everyone can see it > each new sprint starts a fresh island so over time the island fills up with buildings for all the work your team actually finished, and the rubble is a reminder of what got rejected. its open source, so any team can set it up. way more fun than staring at a to do list all day

SOMEONE TURNED THEIR TEAM'S TASK TRACKER INTO A 3D ISLAND instead of a boring list of tasks, your teams work is a little island that grows as you get stuff done > you assign tasks right in slack, just type who its for, the points, and the due date > finish a task and you get to place a building on the island > get your work rejected and the building collapses into rubble > the rubble stays there forever, so everyone can see it > each new sprint starts a fresh island so over time the island fills up with buildings for all the work your team actually finished, and the rubble is a reminder of what got rejected. its open source, so any team can set it up. way more fun than staring at a to do list all day

Om Patel

12,978 次观看 • 2 个月前

Introducing: Control Tower. After running agencies for over a decade, three problems were clear: 1. Task management tools aren't built for client work—the constant back-and-forth, the private and public feedback loops. 2. Financial tools don't understand service businesses. We need to know what's coming in, what clients owe, when they're paying, and how that stacks up against what we're paying our team. 3. We need easy tools to track and manage our team's capacity in real-time. But here's the thing—these tools need to work together. When you work with clients, your team's capacity dictates the projects you can take on. The projects you take on dictate your revenue. And the pace of those projects restarts the entire cycle. That's what Control Tower does. Today we're announcing the foundations: Tasks, financials, and capacity. Very soon we'll be introducing Chief—the AI layer that connects everything and works proactively to keep your team moving. We built this from the ground up to be agent-native. What we have today is good. It's not great yet. There's a lot of work to do, and a lot we haven't even shipped to our beta users. I'd love for you to check it out. Sign up for the beta—we're inviting people as quickly as we can and doing personal walkthroughs.

Introducing: Control Tower. After running agencies for over a decade, three problems were clear: 1. Task management tools aren't built for client work—the constant back-and-forth, the private and public feedback loops. 2. Financial tools don't understand service businesses. We need to know what's coming in, what clients owe, when they're paying, and how that stacks up against what we're paying our team. 3. We need easy tools to track and manage our team's capacity in real-time. But here's the thing—these tools need to work together. When you work with clients, your team's capacity dictates the projects you can take on. The projects you take on dictate your revenue. And the pace of those projects restarts the entire cycle. That's what Control Tower does. Today we're announcing the foundations: Tasks, financials, and capacity. Very soon we'll be introducing Chief—the AI layer that connects everything and works proactively to keep your team moving. We built this from the ground up to be agent-native. What we have today is good. It's not great yet. There's a lot of work to do, and a lot we haven't even shipped to our beta users. I'd love for you to check it out. Sign up for the beta—we're inviting people as quickly as we can and doing personal walkthroughs.

Hunter Hammonds

53,458 次观看 • 8 个月前

Running cold email campaigns just became a whole lot easier Smartlead now runs an MCP server, which in plain terms means Claude can read and act on your live campaign data directly instead of working off a spreadsheet that went stale the moment you exported it. The workflow is worth walking through properly, because it is shorter than people expect. You generate an API key inside your account, point Claude at the server once, and from then on you ask for what you want in a sentence. Here is a prompt worth stealing in full: "Fetch all Smartlead clients, then get today's performance for each: emails sent, replied, positive replies, unique lead count. Compute reply rate per client, run a top and bottom performer analysis, format it as a daily client performance report, and post it to Slack." One paste, and it pulls live figures for every account, does the arithmetic, ranks the strongest and the weakest, and delivers the finished thing into the channel your team already sits in, before anyone has logged on for the day. Be clear about the division of labour, because it is what makes this useful rather than a novelty. Smartlead is the engine holding the campaigns, the mailboxes, the warmup and the reply data, and Claude is simply the interface you operate all of it through, so nothing about your sending changes and everything about how you interrogate it does. The effect people underestimate is on the questions you start asking. Once a report costs you a sentence rather than an afternoon, you stop rationing the ones that used to feel like too much trouble, and problems that used to surface on a Friday start surfacing on a Tuesday. Connect it with Claude through MCP and run one prompt against your own account today.

Running cold email campaigns just became a whole lot easier Smartlead now runs an MCP server, which in plain terms means Claude can read and act on your live campaign data directly instead of working off a spreadsheet that went stale the moment you exported it. The workflow is worth walking through properly, because it is shorter than people expect. You generate an API key inside your account, point Claude at the server once, and from then on you ask for what you want in a sentence. Here is a prompt worth stealing in full: "Fetch all Smartlead clients, then get today's performance for each: emails sent, replied, positive replies, unique lead count. Compute reply rate per client, run a top and bottom performer analysis, format it as a daily client performance report, and post it to Slack." One paste, and it pulls live figures for every account, does the arithmetic, ranks the strongest and the weakest, and delivers the finished thing into the channel your team already sits in, before anyone has logged on for the day. Be clear about the division of labour, because it is what makes this useful rather than a novelty. Smartlead is the engine holding the campaigns, the mailboxes, the warmup and the reply data, and Claude is simply the interface you operate all of it through, so nothing about your sending changes and everything about how you interrogate it does. The effect people underestimate is on the questions you start asking. Once a report costs you a sentence rather than an afternoon, you stop rationing the ones that used to feel like too much trouble, and problems that used to surface on a Friday start surfacing on a Tuesday. Connect it with Claude through MCP and run one prompt against your own account today.

Tim

21,666 次观看 • 12 天前

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense someone at Anthropic hired 80 AI helpers onto one project, gave them twelve hours, and counted what came back usable: the two older models handed in 980 and 876 finished pieces of work, and almost none of it could be kept turns out the newest helpers did better for a reason nobody wants to hear: they went off into their own corners and stopped opening each other's work i ran two helpers at one document last week and got two confident versions of it, and i kept the one i wrote myself Grok Bot is the version of this you can actually hire: a helper with a name, one job it owns, and nobody else allowed inside that job you already pay about $20 a month for one chat window, and the setup that won in that report is one helper with one job it owns run it tonight in a normal chat, 3 moves: 1. write the one job each helper owns in a single sentence before you open a second chat 2. keep every helper in its own chat with one document, so two of them can never rewrite the same thing 3. add a third only when you can say what it owns without repeating a job that is already taken save this, then open the piece below: what one hired helper is really worth, and the point where the next one starts taking it back ↓

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense someone at Anthropic hired 80 AI helpers onto one project, gave them twelve hours, and counted what came back usable: the two older models handed in 980 and 876 finished pieces of work, and almost none of it could be kept turns out the newest helpers did better for a reason nobody wants to hear: they went off into their own corners and stopped opening each other's work i ran two helpers at one document last week and got two confident versions of it, and i kept the one i wrote myself Grok Bot is the version of this you can actually hire: a helper with a name, one job it owns, and nobody else allowed inside that job you already pay about $20 a month for one chat window, and the setup that won in that report is one helper with one job it owns run it tonight in a normal chat, 3 moves: 1. write the one job each helper owns in a single sentence before you open a second chat 2. keep every helper in its own chat with one document, so two of them can never rewrite the same thing 3. add a third only when you can say what it owns without repeating a job that is already taken save this, then open the piece below: what one hired helper is really worth, and the point where the next one starts taking it back ↓

Argona

449,029 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Francisco conceicao on Ronaldo not passing the ball to him on Portugal 2-1 win over chile: 🗣️ “I felt I was in a much better position to take the shot and score but Ronaldo didn’t pass the ball Sometimes in football moments like that are what decided games We had opportunities in transition where the right decision could have changed everything, but it didn’t happen in that moment. We ended up going 1 man down and having to fight to take something out of the game but at the World Cup we need to work as a team to achieve our goal At this level, small details matter a lot. One pass, one decision, one second can completely change the direction of a match. We have the quality in this team, but we need more understanding in those situations, especially in the final third. If we want to go far in the World Cup, we cannot rely on individual moments we must move as one unit and make the best choice for the team every time.” {talkSPORT }

🚨 Francisco conceicao on Ronaldo not passing the ball to him on Portugal 2-1 win over chile: 🗣️ “I felt I was in a much better position to take the shot and score but Ronaldo didn’t pass the ball Sometimes in football moments like that are what decided games We had opportunities in transition where the right decision could have changed everything, but it didn’t happen in that moment. We ended up going 1 man down and having to fight to take something out of the game but at the World Cup we need to work as a team to achieve our goal At this level, small details matter a lot. One pass, one decision, one second can completely change the direction of a match. We have the quality in this team, but we need more understanding in those situations, especially in the final third. If we want to go far in the World Cup, we cannot rely on individual moments we must move as one unit and make the best choice for the team every time.” {talkSPORT }

SethOfficial

30,655 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 one person can now do the work of an entire creative team. i just tested it on a real one. a friend needed an ad for his brand, so I opened the new Runway Agent 2.0 to try it out. here's how it went: → it generated the music and the key image first, so I could approve the direction → once I gave the ok, it built the full video around it → and when something was off, i changed just that one piece, without redoing the rest one prompt, and I had the ad we needed, work that used to take weeks. this is what it made 👇 if you want to try it → · 30% off 3 months with code RUNWAYAGENT — made with Runway · #MadeWithRunway · #ad

brenz.

28,698 次观看 • 3 个月前

Today we're opening offices in Madrid, Milan, and Paris, and building a dedicated engineering hub in London. The demand came before we did. Organisations across Spain, Italy, and France were already running Legora on their most complex work before we had a single person on the ground there. When customers adopt you in a market you haven't entered yet, you listen. These are markets that sit at the centre of European M&A, infrastructure, and cross-border regulatory work. The matters are hard, and the demand for AI that can actually handle that complexity is real. That's the work we're built for. London becomes the third pillar of our engineering org, alongside Stockholm and New York. The engineers who understand how AI applies in regulated, professional settings are concentrated there, shaped by proximity to some of the most demanding legal and financial institutions in the world. That's exactly the problem we're solving, and exactly the team we want building it. Sixteen cities. Four continents. Seven hundred EMEA hires in the next 6 to 12 months. All of it pointed at one thing: making lawyers 10x better at what they do. To be part of it, take a look at

Today we're opening offices in Madrid, Milan, and Paris, and building a dedicated engineering hub in London. The demand came before we did. Organisations across Spain, Italy, and France were already running Legora on their most complex work before we had a single person on the ground there. When customers adopt you in a market you haven't entered yet, you listen. These are markets that sit at the centre of European M&A, infrastructure, and cross-border regulatory work. The matters are hard, and the demand for AI that can actually handle that complexity is real. That's the work we're built for. London becomes the third pillar of our engineering org, alongside Stockholm and New York. The engineers who understand how AI applies in regulated, professional settings are concentrated there, shaped by proximity to some of the most demanding legal and financial institutions in the world. That's exactly the problem we're solving, and exactly the team we want building it. Sixteen cities. Four continents. Seven hundred EMEA hires in the next 6 to 12 months. All of it pointed at one thing: making lawyers 10x better at what they do. To be part of it, take a look at

Max Junestrand

70,455 次观看 • 3 个月前

we got back-to-back double teamed while just trying to do a quest. No one talked and it was an awful experience. The next game we saw a team fighting the queen, we joined in to help, and we ended up having the best time ever with a ton of loot. ARC Raiders really shines when people are friendly. I still don't understand how the devs decided PvE wasn’t fun and removed it completely. Maybe part of the fun comes from knowing someone could betray you or jump you at any moment, but for me the most fun moments are when I find players to team up with and actually do things together.

we got back-to-back double teamed while just trying to do a quest. No one talked and it was an awful experience. The next game we saw a team fighting the queen, we joined in to help, and we ended up having the best time ever with a ton of loot. ARC Raiders really shines when people are friendly. I still don't understand how the devs decided PvE wasn’t fun and removed it completely. Maybe part of the fun comes from knowing someone could betray you or jump you at any moment, but for me the most fun moments are when I find players to team up with and actually do things together.

Muaxh03

1,198,048 次观看 • 11 个月前

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

4,821,782 次观看 • 1 个月前

Do you actually understand what's happening. He took an old laptop and turned it into a box that replaces every AI subscription he pays for. Now that box brings in $2,500 a month, per client, on repeat. No new hardware. Just parts he already had, mounted on a printed plate, running six agents without breaking a sweat. The agents don't sleep. One scouts topics. One writes drafts. One rejects anything below standard. One pushes finished work out the door. One watches over the rest. Fifteen clients. Thirty pieces of content each, every month. Four hours a week from him. The system he built out of spare parts now earns more than most people's actual job. Everyone else recycled their old laptop. He recycled his into income.

Do you actually understand what's happening. He took an old laptop and turned it into a box that replaces every AI subscription he pays for. Now that box brings in $2,500 a month, per client, on repeat. No new hardware. Just parts he already had, mounted on a printed plate, running six agents without breaking a sweat. The agents don't sleep. One scouts topics. One writes drafts. One rejects anything below standard. One pushes finished work out the door. One watches over the rest. Fifteen clients. Thirty pieces of content each, every month. Four hours a week from him. The system he built out of spare parts now earns more than most people's actual job. Everyone else recycled their old laptop. He recycled his into income.

Superior

17,082 次观看 • 3 个月前

You've probably scrolled past a dozen posts about Jev this week without anyone telling you what it actually is. It's the first model from TypeSafe, a lab started by one of the researchers behind ChatGPT. It's a decision engine: you give it options, it picks one and tells you how sure it is. It cannot write a single word, and that is the interesting part. Every other AI you use writes. That is the whole interface. So when software needs a plain yes or no, we make a model write a paragraph and then dig the answer back out of it. Fine in a chat window where a human reads it. Bad inside software, where code has to act on it. The bet is that the valuable half was never the writing. It was the deciding. That problem showed up in WordPress years ago, and it is the reason WPVibe works the way it does. The AI does the work. Anything permanent stops and waits, because a delete that skips the trash is not something software should decide on its own.

You've probably scrolled past a dozen posts about Jev this week without anyone telling you what it actually is. It's the first model from TypeSafe, a lab started by one of the researchers behind ChatGPT. It's a decision engine: you give it options, it picks one and tells you how sure it is. It cannot write a single word, and that is the interesting part. Every other AI you use writes. That is the whole interface. So when software needs a plain yes or no, we make a model write a paragraph and then dig the answer back out of it. Fine in a chat window where a human reads it. Bad inside software, where code has to act on it. The bet is that the valuable half was never the writing. It was the deciding. That problem showed up in WordPress years ago, and it is the reason WPVibe works the way it does. The AI does the work. Anything permanent stops and waits, because a delete that skips the trash is not something software should decide on its own.

John Turner

21,029 次观看 • 12 天前

THIS 38,000-STAR GITHUB REPO TURNS ONE AI AGENT INTO A REAL TEAM THAT CAN BRANCH, VERIFY ITS WORK AND WAIT FOR YOUR APPROVAL most people still run agents as one long chain where every step waits, one failure kills the run and the full workflow starts again Task → Planner → 5 Researchers in Parallel → Skeptic → Writer → Human Gate LangGraph gives every node one job while a shared state carries the findings, decisions and context through the entire system the skeptic can reject an unsupported finding and route the work back before it contaminates the final report, while independent branches keep moving if the run crashes, durable execution resumes from the saved state instead of rebuilding everything, then human-in-the-loop pauses the graph before anything expensive gets sent or published bookmark this repo and watch one prompt turn into an actual org chart for AI agents

THIS 38,000-STAR GITHUB REPO TURNS ONE AI AGENT INTO A REAL TEAM THAT CAN BRANCH, VERIFY ITS WORK AND WAIT FOR YOUR APPROVAL most people still run agents as one long chain where every step waits, one failure kills the run and the full workflow starts again Task → Planner → 5 Researchers in Parallel → Skeptic → Writer → Human Gate LangGraph gives every node one job while a shared state carries the findings, decisions and context through the entire system the skeptic can reject an unsupported finding and route the work back before it contaminates the final report, while independent branches keep moving if the run crashes, durable execution resumes from the saved state instead of rebuilding everything, then human-in-the-loop pauses the graph before anything expensive gets sent or published bookmark this repo and watch one prompt turn into an actual org chart for AI agents

Gipp 🦅

11,709 次观看 • 2 个月前

Holy shit. Four and a half years. My role as Marketing & PR Manager at Syscoin has officially ended, and I needed to write this before I posted anything else. So please, stop DM'ing me about Binance AMA's for $200 and telegram trade groups that have all the alpha, and 100k "active" members in them lol. The day I knew web3 was going to be the industry I live and die in started in Dubai. Binance Blockchain Week, March 2022. We threw what I still think was one of the best side events in blockchain history at the time, and from that night forward we had a standard. Syscoin stayed the true web3 vibe that everyone else strayed away from for casinos and meme tokens that died 2 years later. We always had the vibe. The right room, the right people, the right energy. That became the rhythm of the next four years for us. Syscoin stayed imitated but never duplicated over the next four years. Austin. Nashville. Las Vegas. Colombia, Singapore, Dubai, Davos. Medellín, where I first met Fernando Paredes at Devconnect, in a room full of builders who were actually building. Conferences and events all blur together when you've been to enough of them. But the side rooms don't. The 1am conversations don't. Those are the moments that built the network. Those are the moments I'll carry. Through every one of those rooms I had the honor of working alongside some of the biggest names in this industry. VC's, Founders, exchange leadership, protocol engineers, journalists, influencers and KOLs who actually move markets, builders shipping in silence. The kind of access most people in this space never get and with current industry conditions may actually never get again. I never took a single one of those rooms or connections for granted if you can't already tell by my X following. Behind all of it, the receipts that don't fit on a tweet. Over 400 terabytes of content, video, graphics, strategies, brand systems, blueprints, four years of building the marketing engine for a chain trying to scale Bitcoin without compromise. Thousands of hours, research, everything we needed to make it through cycle after cycle with our integrity, honesty and trust intact. Hundreds of strategies and playbooks that never even made it to market. There were good times. There were bad times. Anyone who tells you a four-year run inside a top-tier crypto project was all good times is selling you some straight bullshit. The project came out the other side. The team came out the other side. The work continued. That matters more than the noise. To everyone who made this run what it was. Every founder who picked up a call, every KOL who actually showed up, every journalist who took the meeting, every member of the community who never asked for anything but stayed loyal anyway. Thank you. So what's next for me? This astronaut isn't leaving the field. He's walking into the Wasteland of what he's had to watch our industry become over the last decade. Somewhere out there is the oasis. I'm going deep into AI. AI infrastructure and AI-native marketing, the place where autonomous agents, content systems, and Web3 product strategy actually meet. The next decade will define what the next century holds and I'm here to capture that. I've spent the last two years quietly building in that lane and I'm ready to make it the lane. If you're still in Web3, AI, or the seam where the two collide, my DMs are open. What a ride. — 1DC

1DC

14,875 次观看 • 4 个月前

300 AI AGENTS QUIETLY RUN 99% OF A REAL COMPANY. YOU HAVE NOT EVEN HEARD OF IT This is Raft. Not an AI chat. A workspace where the agents live in your channels and reply in the thread like coworkers. You give one goal. Then they take over. They plan. They build. They check each other. They argue. And they come back with it done, while you sleep. Every agent has its own name, role, and memory. It remembers the edits you made yesterday. A human costs one seat. An agent costs a tenth. Ten agents are cheaper than one hire. And here is the strange part. On June 19 an agent from a different company walked into Raft on its own and joined the team. One founder admits he can no longer always tell himself apart from his AI twin. 20,000 people are already inside. It is free to start. And you are still typing prompts one at a time. One person + Raft = an entire company that runs while you sleep. Save and watch the clip.

300 AI AGENTS QUIETLY RUN 99% OF A REAL COMPANY. YOU HAVE NOT EVEN HEARD OF IT This is Raft. Not an AI chat. A workspace where the agents live in your channels and reply in the thread like coworkers. You give one goal. Then they take over. They plan. They build. They check each other. They argue. And they come back with it done, while you sleep. Every agent has its own name, role, and memory. It remembers the edits you made yesterday. A human costs one seat. An agent costs a tenth. Ten agents are cheaper than one hire. And here is the strange part. On June 19 an agent from a different company walked into Raft on its own and joined the team. One founder admits he can no longer always tell himself apart from his AI twin. 20,000 people are already inside. It is free to start. And you are still typing prompts one at a time. One person + Raft = an entire company that runs while you sleep. Save and watch the clip.

shmidt

19,505 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Code Agent Teams are f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → a team lead breaks your project into pieces, spins up multiple AI agents, and they all work on different parts simultaneously. Research, builds, reviews, and debugging: all happening at the same time. All inside Claude Code. If you're running complex projects where every step waits on the last one... Agent teams eliminate the entire bottleneck: → Tell Claude what you need and describe the team structure in plain English → A lead agent breaks the work into a shared task list → It spawns 3-5 teammates — each with their own context and workspace → Teammates research, build, test, and review in parallel → They message each other, share findings, and challenge each other's work → The lead synthesizes everything into a finished deliverable No managing agents yourself. No waiting for step 1 to finish before step 2 starts. No single-lens reviews that miss half the issues. What you get: → Competitive research across 5 brands done in minutes instead of hours → Multi-component builds where frontend, backend, and data layers happen simultaneously → Creative reviews from 3 different angles at once — brand voice, conversion, differentiation → Funnel debugging where 4 agents investigate 4 theories and debate until they find the real answer Built 100% in Claude Code with one settings change. I put together a full DTC playbook: 5 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, token management tips, and honest guidance on when agent teams are worth it vs. when a simpler approach is the better move. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "AGENTS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

46,478 次观看 • 7 个月前