Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Wes Huff beautifully explains Sola Scriptura: "Sola Scriptura is the perspective that inspired Scripture is the sole infallible rule of faith & practice for the Church. The perspective is a historical one & can be validated by numerous individuals pre-dating the Reformation."

Truth_matters20's profile picture

Danny

29,793 subscribers

67,769 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Augustine on Sola Scriptura with Jeff Durbin. The early church definitely had a Protestant view of scripture.
0:59

Augustine on Sola Scriptura with Jeff Durbin. The early church definitely had a Protestant view of scripture.

5 Solas

11,794 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Sola Scriptura Taught By Jesus! When sola scriptura is defined correctly, you can see it taught, and practiced all throughout the Bible. What different cults like Roman Catholicism do is they try to misrepresent what sola scriptura means to create strawman arguments!
2:55

Sola Scriptura Taught By Jesus! When sola scriptura is defined correctly, you can see it taught, and practiced all throughout the Bible. What different cults like Roman Catholicism do is they try to misrepresent what sola scriptura means to create strawman arguments!

The Bible In Context

12,260 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

"Sola Scriptura doesn't mean the Nicene Creed doesn't have authority. It means Scripture alone is the sole final authority in matters of truth and doctrine and everything to which Scripture is addressed." From the January 30 edition of The Briefing. Link:
2:41

"Sola Scriptura doesn't mean the Nicene Creed doesn't have authority. It means Scripture alone is the sole final authority in matters of truth and doctrine and everything to which Scripture is addressed." From the January 30 edition of The Briefing. Link:

Albert Mohler

17,377 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

tragedy unfolds: sola scriptura guy is forced to read the scriptura in question 😭😭💔💔
1:26

tragedy unfolds: sola scriptura guy is forced to read the scriptura in question 😭😭💔💔

Momo

35,958 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

To truly study church history is to cease to be Catholic! I personally have studied the early church writers on various subjects like the Eucharist & sola scriptura and there is no abounding evidence that the early church believed identically to Roman Catholicism today!
2:12

To truly study church history is to cease to be Catholic! I personally have studied the early church writers on various subjects like the Eucharist & sola scriptura and there is no abounding evidence that the early church believed identically to Roman Catholicism today!

The Bible In Context

15,572 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“This isn’t about cherry-picking quotes. How did Scripture function? Did it function differently from tradition in the ancient church? The answer is yes.” Michael Horton responds to Trent Horn on Sola Scriptura in the church fathers.
1:19

“This isn’t about cherry-picking quotes. How did Scripture function? Did it function differently from tradition in the ancient church? The answer is yes.” Michael Horton responds to Trent Horn on Sola Scriptura in the church fathers.

Sola Media

16,774 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

THE BIBLE HAPPENED IN THIS ORDER: The apostles built churches FIRST…..then they wrote letters to those churches.....those letters then became the Bible, NOT the other way around. This proves Sola Scriptura false This is why Scripture says the Church (and not Scriptures) is the pillar and foundation of the truth.
0:59

THE BIBLE HAPPENED IN THIS ORDER: The apostles built churches FIRST…..then they wrote letters to those churches.....those letters then became the Bible, NOT the other way around. This proves Sola Scriptura false This is why Scripture says the Church (and not Scriptures) is the pillar and foundation of the truth.

CATHOLIC MAXIMUS

54,849 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

John MacArthur criticizes the Reformers on infant baptism: "You would have thought that if one of the great hallmarks of the Reformation was Sola Scriptura, they would have set aside infant baptism since it wasn't anywhere in the Bible."
0:46

John MacArthur criticizes the Reformers on infant baptism: "You would have thought that if one of the great hallmarks of the Reformation was Sola Scriptura, they would have set aside infant baptism since it wasn't anywhere in the Bible."

Danny

62,416 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sola scriptura was taught by Jesus and His apostles! The only reason someone wants to dismiss this doctrine taught by Jesus is so they can include all of their man-made traditions and pretend they’re divinely inspired!
2:55

Sola scriptura was taught by Jesus and His apostles! The only reason someone wants to dismiss this doctrine taught by Jesus is so they can include all of their man-made traditions and pretend they’re divinely inspired!

The Bible In Context

12,987 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

😨 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗔𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲: 🔥 Sola scriptura is not in Scripture. Sacred Tradition is. A Church with real authority is. 🔥 Jesus never promised a book. He promised a Church. A living body that taught the faith long before a single page of the New Testament existed. 🔥 The Mass came first. The Bible was created to be read at the Mass. This is why first Timothy three fifteen calls the Church the pillar and foundation of truth. 🔥 For the first centuries most Christians could not read. They learned through the living Tradition of the Church Christ founded. This is the part of history no one tells you. 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘭.𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘛𝘪𝘬𝘛𝘰𝘬
1:11

😨 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗵𝗿𝗶𝘀 𝗔𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲: 🔥 Sola scriptura is not in Scripture. Sacred Tradition is. A Church with real authority is. 🔥 Jesus never promised a book. He promised a Church. A living body that taught the faith long before a single page of the New Testament existed. 🔥 The Mass came first. The Bible was created to be read at the Mass. This is why first Timothy three fifteen calls the Church the pillar and foundation of truth. 🔥 For the first centuries most Christians could not read. They learned through the living Tradition of the Church Christ founded. This is the part of history no one tells you. 𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘢𝘭.𝘤𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘤𝘩 𝘛𝘪𝘬𝘛𝘰𝘬

𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦

19,834 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The Book of Enoch is quoted in the New Testament ... so why isn't it in the Bible? Wes Huff explains: "The book doesn't have to be inspired to be useful." The Church Fathers determined that it wasn't divinely inspired. But that doesn't mean it is entirely worthless.
0:59

The Book of Enoch is quoted in the New Testament ... so why isn't it in the Bible? Wes Huff explains: "The book doesn't have to be inspired to be useful." The Church Fathers determined that it wasn't divinely inspired. But that doesn't mean it is entirely worthless.

The Conservative Alternative

160,568 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Your 66 book canon is a 19th century invention, it was not apostolic at all. So when you say to appeal to “Scripture alone” i say which Scripture? and who had the authority to determine it? I’ll tell you who, The British & Foreign Bible Society in 1830, for money saving purposes. Sad. Sola Scriptura is not taught in Scripture. No verse states “Scripture alone” or “all souls are subject to the scriptures alone” no verbiage like this exists in the Bible. Protestants cannot produce a single biblical passage that clearly teaches Sola Scriptura alone excluding oral tradition. In fact the Bible repeatedly teaches to hold fast to oral apostolic tradition.
1:03

Your 66 book canon is a 19th century invention, it was not apostolic at all. So when you say to appeal to “Scripture alone” i say which Scripture? and who had the authority to determine it? I’ll tell you who, The British & Foreign Bible Society in 1830, for money saving purposes. Sad. Sola Scriptura is not taught in Scripture. No verse states “Scripture alone” or “all souls are subject to the scriptures alone” no verbiage like this exists in the Bible. Protestants cannot produce a single biblical passage that clearly teaches Sola Scriptura alone excluding oral tradition. In fact the Bible repeatedly teaches to hold fast to oral apostolic tradition.

CATHOLIC MAXIMUS

15,587 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Peak sola scriptura: fat baby mama theology - Jesus was killed by the Roman Catholics and it’s cool to be a 304
0:49

Peak sola scriptura: fat baby mama theology - Jesus was killed by the Roman Catholics and it’s cool to be a 304

Jay Dyer

26,876 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Dr. John Bergsma: “I was a Protestant pastor. Started to have doubts about Protestant theology. Saw that Sola Scriptura didn't work, “faith alone” wasn’t Scriptural. Went back to school. Saw that I would not be recognized as a true Christian by the Early Church. Became Catholic.”
0:49

Dr. John Bergsma: “I was a Protestant pastor. Started to have doubts about Protestant theology. Saw that Sola Scriptura didn't work, “faith alone” wasn’t Scriptural. Went back to school. Saw that I would not be recognized as a true Christian by the Early Church. Became Catholic.”

MrCasey

41,866 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

𝗜𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗜𝗳 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝗲𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗶𝘁, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. That is not fear mongering. That is logic. Catholicism gives you Scripture, Sacraments, apostolic authority, the Eucharist, and a Church Christ promised the gates of hell would not overcome. Sola Scriptura gives you interpretation, division, and assurance with no authority to back it. One side risks obedience. The other risks eternity. Choose carefully.
1:05

𝗜𝗳 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗜𝗳 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝗲𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗶𝘁, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴. That is not fear mongering. That is logic. Catholicism gives you Scripture, Sacraments, apostolic authority, the Eucharist, and a Church Christ promised the gates of hell would not overcome. Sola Scriptura gives you interpretation, division, and assurance with no authority to back it. One side risks obedience. The other risks eternity. Choose carefully.

𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦

21,323 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻 𝗟𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲. 𝗛𝗲 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁. 😬 When prayers for the dead contradicted his theology, Luther did not change his doctrine. He removed Scripture. Sola Scriptura did not shape belief. Belief reshaped Scripture. History is very clear. 📖✝️
0:54

𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗻 𝗟𝘂𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲. 𝗛𝗲 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁. 😬 When prayers for the dead contradicted his theology, Luther did not change his doctrine. He removed Scripture. Sola Scriptura did not shape belief. Belief reshaped Scripture. History is very clear. 📖✝️

𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦

17,560 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

There is NO proof that Jesus or the apostles taught anything BUT Sola Scriptura when properly defined. Sure you’ll find the word tradition in a few passages, but those passages in context are not writing a blank check for all the future inventions of Romanism!
2:59

There is NO proof that Jesus or the apostles taught anything BUT Sola Scriptura when properly defined. Sure you’ll find the word tradition in a few passages, but those passages in context are not writing a blank check for all the future inventions of Romanism!

The Bible In Context

47,128 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Wesley Huff’s course: The Historical Reliability of the Bible, is available now. In this course, Wes Huff guides us through the historical foundations of Scripture. Together, we examine the evidence for the Bible's reliability from the formation of the biblical canon to the textual history of the Old and New Testaments, as well as the archaeological discoveries that illuminate the biblical world. Along the way, Huff explains how the early church recognized the New Testament canon, traces the history of English Bible translation, and concludes by evaluating historical Jesus studies, showing how the cumulative historical evidence supports the Gospels as reliable eyewitness accounts of Jesus.
1:29

Wesley Huff’s course: The Historical Reliability of the Bible, is available now. In this course, Wes Huff guides us through the historical foundations of Scripture. Together, we examine the evidence for the Bible's reliability from the formation of the biblical canon to the textual history of the Old and New Testaments, as well as the archaeological discoveries that illuminate the biblical world. Along the way, Huff explains how the early church recognized the New Testament canon, traces the history of English Bible translation, and concludes by evaluating historical Jesus studies, showing how the cumulative historical evidence supports the Gospels as reliable eyewitness accounts of Jesus.

Peterson Academy

149,050 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Wes Huff 🧵 Mistaken view on RC/Protestantism #1: Wes Huff believes that by dividing "what Scripture is" & "what Scripture does," one proves Scripture's sufficiency w/o Tradition But the former isn't independent of human authorship/canon-selection & the latter isn't independent of authoritative interpretation--both of which prioritize Tradition
1:27

Wes Huff 🧵 Mistaken view on RC/Protestantism #1: Wes Huff believes that by dividing "what Scripture is" & "what Scripture does," one proves Scripture's sufficiency w/o Tradition But the former isn't independent of human authorship/canon-selection & the latter isn't independent of authoritative interpretation--both of which prioritize Tradition

Timothy Gordon (Rules for Retrogrades Show)

23,978 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce