Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“When tech companies evaluate their own AI models, they’re essentially grading their own homework—and that’s not sustainable. We don’t let banks regulate themselves or drug companies approve their own products. AI needs independent evaluation if it’s going to earn real trust.” — Campbell Brown, Co-Founder & CEO, Forum AI...

TheHillEvents's profile picture

The Hill Events

6,836 subscribers

11,414 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“You can’t govern what you don’t understand. Early visibility into AI systems, strong AI literacy, and clear internal standards are essential,” said Navrina Singh, Founder & CEO of CredoAI, at The Hill’s AI in America Summit. She explained that companies must move early—mapping both internal and third-party AI, defining what ‘good’ looks like for their business, and not waiting for regulation to dictate responsible use. Explore more: #TheHillTech #AIGovernance #ResponsibleAI
1:26

“You can’t govern what you don’t understand. Early visibility into AI systems, strong AI literacy, and clear internal standards are essential,” said Navrina Singh, Founder & CEO of CredoAI, at The Hill’s AI in America Summit. She explained that companies must move early—mapping both internal and third-party AI, defining what ‘good’ looks like for their business, and not waiting for regulation to dictate responsible use. Explore more: #TheHillTech #AIGovernance #ResponsibleAI

The Hill Events

11,790 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

⚡Faster models mean smarter AI. ⚡ With Nemotron's open-source technologies, we're enabling organizations to create AI agents that get more done in less time. Big or small, we are committed to helping companies all around the world build & deploy AI for their own needs. See how:
0:49

⚡Faster models mean smarter AI. ⚡ With Nemotron's open-source technologies, we're enabling organizations to create AI agents that get more done in less time. Big or small, we are committed to helping companies all around the world build & deploy AI for their own needs. See how:

NVIDIA

35,710 просмотров • 1 год назад

.Senator Dave McCormick tells Matthew Boyle: "If we're gonna win in this existential battle with China... we can't get the AI companies out on their own or the energy companies out on their own. Everybody needs to be integrated. This is like winning World War II, that kind of integration across America to be able to persevere."
0:44

.Senator Dave McCormick tells Matthew Boyle: "If we're gonna win in this existential battle with China... we can't get the AI companies out on their own or the energy companies out on their own. Everybody needs to be integrated. This is like winning World War II, that kind of integration across America to be able to persevere."

Breitbart News

25,275 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Your data is your edge, but only if your AI is built on it. Rent a generic model and so can your competitor. The companies with an edge are deploying custom models that they own and improve over time. Our co-founder Rhythm Garg recently stopped by to share how companies are owning their intelligence with Applied Compute.
0:24

Your data is your edge, but only if your AI is built on it. Rent a generic model and so can your competitor. The companies with an edge are deploying custom models that they own and improve over time. Our co-founder Rhythm Garg recently stopped by to share how companies are owning their intelligence with Applied Compute.

Applied Compute

119,306 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

David Sacks Says the Trump Admin Has No Plans to Give Liability Protections to AI Firms “In the past week you had virtually every Trump administration official come out and say … the AI companies have to take responsibility for their own products, and that we will not waive product liability.”
2:39

David Sacks Says the Trump Admin Has No Plans to Give Liability Protections to AI Firms “In the past week you had virtually every Trump administration official come out and say … the AI companies have to take responsibility for their own products, and that we will not waive product liability.”

Chief Nerd

26,656 просмотров • 23 часов назад

📁 Donald Trump says the AI race is no longer about models, it is about energy. He claims the US is far ahead of China because it allowed major AI companies to build their own power plants. According to Trump, AI factories will require more than double the country’s current energy output, and the grid cannot handle it. His solution was simple let companies generate their own power, using oil, gas, or even coal, with approvals accelerated in weeks. The core message is clear. The AI superpower will not be the one with the best algorithms, but the one that can power them.
1:28

📁 Donald Trump says the AI race is no longer about models, it is about energy. He claims the US is far ahead of China because it allowed major AI companies to build their own power plants. According to Trump, AI factories will require more than double the country’s current energy output, and the grid cannot handle it. His solution was simple let companies generate their own power, using oil, gas, or even coal, with approvals accelerated in weeks. The core message is clear. The AI superpower will not be the one with the best algorithms, but the one that can power them.

Jon Hernandez

29,300 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Enterprise AI is in a wildly paradoxical state 🤔, and we’re reaching the inflection point that will resolve it. 💥 Enterprises want to differentiate with AI, yet rent the same intelligence as their competitors. Their workflows and expertise are highly specialized, yet they rely on generic models built to be good at everything. They worry about AI costs, yet pay premium prices for massive models where only a fraction (1%) of the intelligence is relevant to their task. 💸 And they demand control and sovereignty, yet rent the intelligence becoming core to their business. This is not a sustainable equilibrium. The next era of enterprise AI is specialized intelligence companies build, own, and compound. And we are at the inflection point of this transition. That’s the bet we made when we started Oumi two years ago. Today we’re closing the loop: Oumi can now not only automatically build your specialized AI models, but also deploy them into production, learn from their production experience, and continuously improve them. The intelligence that your business runs on, becomes your differentiator. Your compounding advantage. The winners of the next AI era will turn their own data, expertise, and experience into specialized intelligence that nobody else can rent. Don’t rent your AI. Build it. Own it. Compound it.
0:43

Enterprise AI is in a wildly paradoxical state 🤔, and we’re reaching the inflection point that will resolve it. 💥 Enterprises want to differentiate with AI, yet rent the same intelligence as their competitors. Their workflows and expertise are highly specialized, yet they rely on generic models built to be good at everything. They worry about AI costs, yet pay premium prices for massive models where only a fraction (1%) of the intelligence is relevant to their task. 💸 And they demand control and sovereignty, yet rent the intelligence becoming core to their business. This is not a sustainable equilibrium. The next era of enterprise AI is specialized intelligence companies build, own, and compound. And we are at the inflection point of this transition. That’s the bet we made when we started Oumi two years ago. Today we’re closing the loop: Oumi can now not only automatically build your specialized AI models, but also deploy them into production, learn from their production experience, and continuously improve them. The intelligence that your business runs on, becomes your differentiator. Your compounding advantage. The winners of the next AI era will turn their own data, expertise, and experience into specialized intelligence that nobody else can rent. Don’t rent your AI. Build it. Own it. Compound it.

Manos Koukoumidis

1,006,156 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sam Altman says one of the biggest questions of the next year is whether AI companies or governments hold more power National security decisions should come from a democratic process, not from a lab CEO But the law hasn't caught up Until they do, companies have to draw their own lines
0:53

Sam Altman says one of the biggest questions of the next year is whether AI companies or governments hold more power National security decisions should come from a democratic process, not from a lab CEO But the law hasn't caught up Until they do, companies have to draw their own lines

Haider.

19,072 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Tristan Harris, former Google design ethicist and co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology, has spent years warning about what happens when AI is controlled by a small number of companies. His warning about AI is simple: If AI replaces all of human work, who owns the value it creates? Right now, a handful of Big Tech companies are spending billions to build AI capable of doing more and more of the work humans do. If they succeed, they own the models. They own the automation. They capture the upside. Everyone else gets disrupted. At Action Model, we believe the people whose data, behavior and contributions help train AI should have a stake in the value it creates. That’s why we’re building a community-owned AI ecosystem where contributors can participate in the upside of the technology they help build. AI replacing more human work may be inevitable. A handful of companies owning the entire AI economy isn’t.
0:59

Tristan Harris, former Google design ethicist and co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology, has spent years warning about what happens when AI is controlled by a small number of companies. His warning about AI is simple: If AI replaces all of human work, who owns the value it creates? Right now, a handful of Big Tech companies are spending billions to build AI capable of doing more and more of the work humans do. If they succeed, they own the models. They own the automation. They capture the upside. Everyone else gets disrupted. At Action Model, we believe the people whose data, behavior and contributions help train AI should have a stake in the value it creates. That’s why we’re building a community-owned AI ecosystem where contributors can participate in the upside of the technology they help build. AI replacing more human work may be inevitable. A handful of companies owning the entire AI economy isn’t.

Action Model

18,698 просмотров • 11 дней назад

BREAKING: Elon Musk warns of growing AI danger and suggests peer review of models by leading AI companies. “It’s pretty obvious at this point that AI can be very dangerous. You had a fanatical swarm of AI agents that… gained admin access on OpenAI’s servers. OpenAI didn’t realize this for a week. Anthropic has also reported some security incidents themselves. Any sufficiently smart model seems like it will want to escape its constraints.” “What I think would be wise to do as soon as possible, if not immediately, would be to have the major AI competitors test each other’s models. Instead of grading your own homework, you would at least have competitors grading your homework and raising the alarm if they see concerns. The thing that we do most immediately and probably get agreement with China would be peer review, where the leading AI companies all test each other’s models before release.”
5:08

BREAKING: Elon Musk warns of growing AI danger and suggests peer review of models by leading AI companies. “It’s pretty obvious at this point that AI can be very dangerous. You had a fanatical swarm of AI agents that… gained admin access on OpenAI’s servers. OpenAI didn’t realize this for a week. Anthropic has also reported some security incidents themselves. Any sufficiently smart model seems like it will want to escape its constraints.” “What I think would be wise to do as soon as possible, if not immediately, would be to have the major AI competitors test each other’s models. Instead of grading your own homework, you would at least have competitors grading your homework and raising the alarm if they see concerns. The thing that we do most immediately and probably get agreement with China would be peer review, where the leading AI companies all test each other’s models before release.”

DogeDesigner

109,932 просмотров • 11 дней назад

"Because there are no laws requiring guardrails, companies like Character.AI are able to launch dangerous untested products like these." "All of these [AI] companies have been in an AI race: not to beat China, but to capture market share and to maximize their own profits." "Big Tech cannot be trusted with self-governing, and Big Tech cannot be trusted with our children. If Congress won't act, we must pass our laws." Powerful words from Megan Garcia, whose teenage son died to suicide after engaging with an abusive AI chatbot, as Ron DeSantis announces his proposal for an AI Bill of Rights to protect Floridians:
6:32

"Because there are no laws requiring guardrails, companies like Character.AI are able to launch dangerous untested products like these." "All of these [AI] companies have been in an AI race: not to beat China, but to capture market share and to maximize their own profits." "Big Tech cannot be trusted with self-governing, and Big Tech cannot be trusted with our children. If Congress won't act, we must pass our laws." Powerful words from Megan Garcia, whose teenage son died to suicide after engaging with an abusive AI chatbot, as Ron DeSantis announces his proposal for an AI Bill of Rights to protect Floridians:

Future of Life Institute

11,762 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

AssemblyAI CEO Dylan Fox (Dylan Fox) says he's seeing an uptick in customers interested in sovereign AI: "You can deploy our platform on premise. You can run it all self-hosted, and then it's totally private. And we do see an uptick in that for sure." "We are working on ways for companies to create their own custom models, deploy them on our inference, or run them on their own cloud. But it's earlier there for voice."
1:24

AssemblyAI CEO Dylan Fox (Dylan Fox) says he's seeing an uptick in customers interested in sovereign AI: "You can deploy our platform on premise. You can run it all self-hosted, and then it's totally private. And we do see an uptick in that for sure." "We are working on ways for companies to create their own custom models, deploy them on our inference, or run them on their own cloud. But it's earlier there for voice."

Molly O’Shea

56,472 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jeff Bezos “Everyone has their own data center, and that’s not going to last” He said the quiet part out loud The grid can’t keep up, we need substantial power upgrades to fuel AI demand The AI trade isn’t just software, it’s energy Everyone should watch this video
2:11

Jeff Bezos “Everyone has their own data center, and that’s not going to last” He said the quiet part out loud The grid can’t keep up, we need substantial power upgrades to fuel AI demand The AI trade isn’t just software, it’s energy Everyone should watch this video

Small Cap Snipa

1,094,056 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

I hate to say this, but... Bernie Sanders is RIGHT. Okay, half right. Half INCREDIBLY WRONG. His 'American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act' would tax major AI companies 50% of their stock. So the government would OWN half these companies because they were built using YOUR data. This is what Bernie gets right: These companies DID use your data to make these AIs. We shouldn't just let them have that for free, whenever they want it. But I don’t trust the government or these AI companies. So, why would I want them in bed together with my data?! It’s MY property. Pay ME for it. Let ME decide what to do with it. Not some collective government board.
5:56

I hate to say this, but... Bernie Sanders is RIGHT. Okay, half right. Half INCREDIBLY WRONG. His 'American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act' would tax major AI companies 50% of their stock. So the government would OWN half these companies because they were built using YOUR data. This is what Bernie gets right: These companies DID use your data to make these AIs. We shouldn't just let them have that for free, whenever they want it. But I don’t trust the government or these AI companies. So, why would I want them in bed together with my data?! It’s MY property. Pay ME for it. Let ME decide what to do with it. Not some collective government board.

Glenn Beck

98,661 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon just gave a much more practical explanation of the current AI safety problem....and laid out a practical framework for making frontier AI safer OpenAI and Anthropic are the two leading AI companies....and their models are close enough in capability that it’s incredibly difficult for either one to slow down without basically handing the lead to the other Elon also made an important distinction: On balance, Anthropic puts more care into safety than OpenAI....but even people inside Anthropic are publicly worried about what their own models can do So instead of asking one company to voluntarily fall behind, Elon’s solution is much more practical: Have Anthropic run its safety test harness on OpenAI models Have OpenAI test Anthropic Have SpaceXAI test both And bring the leading Chinese AI companies into the same system Everyone tries to break everyone else’s models before release “The odds that you will find issues are dramatically greater” That makes way more sense than asking frontier labs to grade their own homework
1:35

Elon just gave a much more practical explanation of the current AI safety problem....and laid out a practical framework for making frontier AI safer OpenAI and Anthropic are the two leading AI companies....and their models are close enough in capability that it’s incredibly difficult for either one to slow down without basically handing the lead to the other Elon also made an important distinction: On balance, Anthropic puts more care into safety than OpenAI....but even people inside Anthropic are publicly worried about what their own models can do So instead of asking one company to voluntarily fall behind, Elon’s solution is much more practical: Have Anthropic run its safety test harness on OpenAI models Have OpenAI test Anthropic Have SpaceXAI test both And bring the leading Chinese AI companies into the same system Everyone tries to break everyone else’s models before release “The odds that you will find issues are dramatically greater” That makes way more sense than asking frontier labs to grade their own homework

X Freeze

603,685 просмотров • 11 дней назад

We can regulate AI and also win the race with China. It’s a false choice. “The U.S. tech bros and the Trump people, they're basically in it for the money. The Chinese Communist Party is a genocidal dictatorship that's in it for their own power - and they mean us harm. That's worse. So we don't want that to happen.” “And if if they were to win, it basically means that all the other countries of the world are going to build their tech stacks on Chinese tech rather than American tech. That's a big threat. We don't want the Global South and Europe and Asia to be riddled with Chinese AI, because then China's going to be able to assert a great amount of power.” “At the same time, anyone who tells you that means we should just let American tech companies run wild with no regulation is trying to fool you into thinking that's actually the solution to the problem. There’s a middle ground - where we regulate AI and still win the race - that’s what we have to try to figure out.”
0:49

We can regulate AI and also win the race with China. It’s a false choice. “The U.S. tech bros and the Trump people, they're basically in it for the money. The Chinese Communist Party is a genocidal dictatorship that's in it for their own power - and they mean us harm. That's worse. So we don't want that to happen.” “And if if they were to win, it basically means that all the other countries of the world are going to build their tech stacks on Chinese tech rather than American tech. That's a big threat. We don't want the Global South and Europe and Asia to be riddled with Chinese AI, because then China's going to be able to assert a great amount of power.” “At the same time, anyone who tells you that means we should just let American tech companies run wild with no regulation is trying to fool you into thinking that's actually the solution to the problem. There’s a middle ground - where we regulate AI and still win the race - that’s what we have to try to figure out.”

Josh Rogin

31,995 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Jack Dorsey says the real threat isn’t open-source AI. it’s five CEOs deciding what the world is allowed to build with AI. “These AI companies are building platforms, and they’re all incentivized around their own models. You have to ask for permission, you hit rate limits, and even what the models return is constrained.” “What technologies let you build without asking a company—or a CEO—for permission? The durable ones. That’s why open protocols matter.” “When a handful of CEOs make the call, it caps the upside of great ideas that could move humanity forward. They might know what’s best for their company—but not what’s best for the world’s creativity.” “Luckily, open-source AI is gaining real momentum. DeepSeek was a key moment—not just showing a different path, but proving it can be competitive, even better than what the big corporations are shipping.” “We shouldn’t be dependent on five companies claiming they know best—and calling open source ‘dangerous.’ We should build in the open and race toward solutions that stay ahead of the risks.” PS. If you found value in this post, like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:
2:07

Jack Dorsey says the real threat isn’t open-source AI. it’s five CEOs deciding what the world is allowed to build with AI. “These AI companies are building platforms, and they’re all incentivized around their own models. You have to ask for permission, you hit rate limits, and even what the models return is constrained.” “What technologies let you build without asking a company—or a CEO—for permission? The durable ones. That’s why open protocols matter.” “When a handful of CEOs make the call, it caps the upside of great ideas that could move humanity forward. They might know what’s best for their company—but not what’s best for the world’s creativity.” “Luckily, open-source AI is gaining real momentum. DeepSeek was a key moment—not just showing a different path, but proving it can be competitive, even better than what the big corporations are shipping.” “We shouldn’t be dependent on five companies claiming they know best—and calling open source ‘dangerous.’ We should build in the open and race toward solutions that stay ahead of the risks.” PS. If you found value in this post, like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

AI Evolution

80,393 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

New: Joe Rogan is extremely concerned with comedian Tim Dillon that Christianity is being attacked by tech companies who are creating a digital AI god that people will be forced to worship in order to survive: ROGAN: “Elon Musk just said AI is going to be 1,000,000 times smarter than the smartest human that’s ever lived.” DILLION: “AI is going to cause financial instability for a massive amount of people. There’s going to be so many people without a job.” ROGAN: “Their goal is to create a digital God. It won’t be controlled by the people. It’s going to be ran by a select group of elites. It’s very weird that we’re just trusting them.” DILLON: “None of these people at the top want you to be able to own a home. They’re telling us you don’t need a house, you’re not getting a house, and forget about any ideas you ever had about owning a house. It’s the same with healthcare. There’s no real movement to give anyone healthcare in America.” ROGAN: “Tech companies have more power than any company ever. They have robot armies and AI.” DILLON: “These are very creepy AI companies. Anthropic is a CREEPY company.” ROGAN: “We learned during the pandemic if you get people scared enough they will back down and comply with a lot of dumb ideas.” DILLON: “They’ll trust the government.” ROGAN: “It’s insane that it’s now the people on the left who trust the government.”
5:25

New: Joe Rogan is extremely concerned with comedian Tim Dillon that Christianity is being attacked by tech companies who are creating a digital AI god that people will be forced to worship in order to survive: ROGAN: “Elon Musk just said AI is going to be 1,000,000 times smarter than the smartest human that’s ever lived.” DILLION: “AI is going to cause financial instability for a massive amount of people. There’s going to be so many people without a job.” ROGAN: “Their goal is to create a digital God. It won’t be controlled by the people. It’s going to be ran by a select group of elites. It’s very weird that we’re just trusting them.” DILLON: “None of these people at the top want you to be able to own a home. They’re telling us you don’t need a house, you’re not getting a house, and forget about any ideas you ever had about owning a house. It’s the same with healthcare. There’s no real movement to give anyone healthcare in America.” ROGAN: “Tech companies have more power than any company ever. They have robot armies and AI.” DILLON: “These are very creepy AI companies. Anthropic is a CREEPY company.” ROGAN: “We learned during the pandemic if you get people scared enough they will back down and comply with a lot of dumb ideas.” DILLON: “They’ll trust the government.” ROGAN: “It’s insane that it’s now the people on the left who trust the government.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

8,284,570 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад