Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

While I'm busy stepping on controversial topics, let's debunk "Hyperpalatable" Foods. The term hyperpalatable foods sounds scientific… but it’s actually a circular idea that does more to confuse than to clarify. It's "fluff," not science and should not guide national nutrition policy. We break it all down (cc Dr....

12,609 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A first of its kind government lawsuit has been launched against 11 Big Food companies for knowingly creating highly addictive, poisonous, ultra processed foods Companies being sued include giants like Kellogg and Coca-Cola Showing these foods are liked to obesity, cancer, diabetes and more “They're on nearly every shelf in nearly every grocery store across the country. Ultra-processed foods now make up over 50% of the American diet. Our case is about companies who design food to be harmful and addictive. In San Francisco today, City Attorney David Chiu announced the first government lawsuit of its kind against 11 companies that manufacture ultra-processed foods, including breakfast titan Kellogg and beverage maker Coca-Cola, accusing them of using unfair and deceptive marketing to sell food. We've known for a long time that the ingredients in many of these ultra-processed foods are unhealthy. — We have all suspected for a long time that food that is not food were likely not good for us, but it took many years for the science to catch up. Research has linked ultra-processed foods to obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. In a statement, a trade group representing many of the companies named in the lawsuit said, There is currently no agreed-upon the scientific definition of ultra-processed foods and that calling them unhealthy is misleading to consumers. There's a clear definition in California law on what ultra-processed foods are — San Francisco has a history of taking on big business. They previously sued and won multi-million dollar lawsuits against big tobacco, lead paint and opioid manufacturers.“

Wall Street Apes

406,381 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

"We had a three-hour interview with [Grusch]. I felt like we got some new stuff, and probably not things I can talk about on a podcast. We were...discouraged from actually including it." (Thanks to David Haith. I, too, wish Caleb would have tried to get more out of Robinson on who convinced him to take Grusch out of their documentary, and more importantly, why. Missed opportunity, IMO.) Dr. Brett Robinson: "We actually interviewed David Grusch, the whistleblower from two years ago, I guess, now. We had a three-hour interview with him. I felt like we got some new stuff, and probably not things I can talk about on a podcast." (If it was in the interview, which you decided to scrub, why not talk about what he said? I once had someone ask me to not publish a transcript. I checked with a few folks to make sure I was in the right and published it any way. No harm, no foul.) Robinson: "But, we were, let's say, discouraged from actually including it in the final [documentary?]." Caleb Mayo (Caleb Mayo): "Discouraged by Mr. Grusch, or by other people?" Robinson: "Other people." (If it wasn't Grusch who asked Robinson not to include it, he was under no obligation to abide by their wishes. I may think differently if I knew who asked him, and the reason, but I know he's not gonna share that. More than one person? Someone connected to the world of Intel? This is disappointing.) Mayo: "Oh my. Oh geez, this is everybody's least favorite part of the conversation is the shadowy cover up, deep state-bullshit, frankly." (It's not my least favorite and I'm sure I'm not alone. And...since we don't know why they wanted the interview taken out of the doc, we can't assume the request came from some alleged "deep-state" folks. And it may have had nothing to do with a "cover-up.") Mayo: "But staying on the idea of a fuller picture for a minute, this is gonna feel maybe like jumping ahead, but we're gonna keep our conversation sort of tight today, so..." (I understand you had other topics (like what the phenomenon represents and the fuller picture ) that you wanted to get to, but you had an exclusive and I wish you had stayed on the Grusch topic for a bit longer. We're all jonesing for new Grusch interviews.)

Joe Murgia

47,874 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten