Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Why are suppressors — a basic safety tool — so heavily regulated? The unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 implemented burdensome regulations and a $200 tax on suppressors. Over 90 years later, that tax still exists. It was never about safety — it was about control. Last night, Ways...

92,817 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Phil Labonte
Phil Labontevor 1 Jahr

just remove them from the NFA. you can put that in the bill.

Profilbild von Hard Roadz🇺🇸
Hard Roadz🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

@WaysandMeansGOP HARD STOP! Yes, the cost of the tax stamp is an issue, but the real problem that everyone is pissed about is the unnecessary and unconstitutional registration of the suppressor. The NFA is a ridiculous and outdated idea. Abolish the NFA!

Profilbild von Bryan LaFonte
Bryan LaFontevor 1 Jahr

Your half-measure could end up making it MORE difficult to completely remove silencers from the NFA in the future.

Profilbild von GunsNewYork (In Exile)
GunsNewYork (In Exile)vor 1 Jahr

Why was the HPA language modified and this watering down included? And if the original language was problematic, was the parliamentarian consulted?

Profilbild von TexasSurplusPro 🇺🇸 🐊
TexasSurplusPro 🇺🇸 🐊vor 1 Jahr

You could’ve just gone along with the Hearing Protection Act instead of trying to gaslight us. This is your fault. The blame lays squarely on you and the rest of the @WaysandMeansGOP. We’re not done lobbying for this yet.

Profilbild von Ferbz
Ferbzvor 1 Jahr

I don’t want a lower or no tax. I want Suppressor, Short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns OUT of the NFA. I don’t want a $0 tax, I want no NFA for these items. Pass the Hearing Protection Act as originally written out of committee and send it for a vote.

Profilbild von Rippinghawk
Rippinghawkvor 1 Jahr

YOU had the ability to remove this "basic safety tool" from regulation and you decided not to. What did you get in return for not sticking to the goal? What has you compromised?

Profilbild von Travis R
Travis Rvor 1 Jahr

Pull suppressors from the NFA. WHY ARE YOU GAY.

Profilbild von Archie Little
Archie Littlevor 1 Jahr

@WaysandMeansGOP We The People want the Hearing Protection Act to be passed as written, completely out of the NFA. If the ATF can have suppressors for Heath & Safety, they We The People should be able to have them for the same reason. Failure will taken care of at the Voting booth!!!!

Profilbild von Gun Giveaway Tracker Guy 🔫
Gun Giveaway Tracker Guy 🔫vor 1 Jahr

Your proposal? The original would have removed suppressors from the NFA entirely. It's still about control, and you are supporting that control. Dont act like this is your victory. This is an insult to the Second Amendment and to your constituents.

Ähnliche Videos

On 4th of July Independence Day, you should know the Income Tax was deemed Unconstitutional “There's no income tax in America until the Civil War. An emergency one Lincoln pushed after the Civil War, it's repealed 1892. They tried to have a peacetime income tax, it’s declared unconstitutional Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, the 16th Amendment in 1913. It's a 1% tax on the top 1% richest people in the country. It's not to tax the people, it’s to go after those robber barons. The Rockefellers, Carnegies, J. Paul Getty's, the Astors. It would be sort of like today that only Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and George Soros, that's what the tax is for. And so you have Taft, pushing through a corporate income tax. And only the extreme wealthy owned corporate stock, so it was a backdoor way to get at them. Teddy Roosevelt was responsible for inheritance tax, because only the extreme wealthy had an inheritance worth leaving. But finally, Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, which is the 1% tax on the top 1% richest people.” And today this is all applied to everyone Let me clearly break down the order of events: During the Civil War era (1861–1872) The first federal income tax was enacted during the Civil War under Lincoln. It was a temporary wartime measure. It was repealed in 1872, The Supreme Court upheld it as constitutional in Springer v. United States In 1894 there was another peacetime attempt at an income tax. Congress passed a 2% tax on incomes over $4,000 as part of the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act. The Supreme Court struck it down in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. They again said it was unconstitutional So next in 1913 Congress forces an income tax on us with the 16th Amendment But what else happened in 1913? The federal reserve was established We had a central banking takeover and that same year they passed the income tax to steal from all of us This should have never been allowed to happened, the income tax was ruled unconstitutional It’s time to set Americans free and abolish the income tax

Wall Street Apes

161,110 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is why Rep. Andrew Clyde (A+ GOA Rated) just voted NO on the reconciliation bill in committee ⤵️ "House Republicans have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to deliver real conservative change in Washington. [This includes] restoring Second Amendment rights. "Unfortunately, the current version falls short of these goals and fails to deliver the transformative change that Americans were promised. Substantive improvements are needed, and I look forward to working with this committee and our House Republican conference to make sure we deliver. "As an ardent Second Amendment defender, I’ve always promised to defend my constituents’ Second Amendment rights. Today, excise taxes, specifically transfer and making taxes, are imposed on every firearm regulated under the National Firearms Act of 1934. "As Chief Justice John Marshall warned in 1819, 'The power to tax involves the power to destroy,' and he was absolutely right. These taxes have enabled unconstitutional regulation and registration under the National Firearms Act. "This is exemplified by the Biden administration’s dangerous pistol brace rule, which turned millions of law-abiding gun owners, many of them veterans, into felons overnight. The House now has a historic opportunity to repeal the burdensome taxation, registration, and regulation of short-barreled firearms, both rifles and shotguns, and suppressors under the National Firearms Act. The American people are watching; it is time to deliver. "For these reasons, I am unable to support this package in its current form, but I look forward to strengthening this bill to ensure that it does pass so that we fulfill all of our America-first promises to the American people. Thank you, and I yield back."

Gun Owners of America

20,217 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr