Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Why are suppressors — a basic safety tool — so heavily regulated? The unconstitutional National Firearms Act of 1934 implemented burdensome regulations and a $200 tax on suppressors. Over 90 years later, that tax still exists. It was never about safety — it was about control. Last night, Ways...

92,817 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Phil Labonte's profile picture
Phil Labonte1 year ago

just remove them from the NFA. you can put that in the bill.

Hard Roadz🇺🇸's profile picture
Hard Roadz🇺🇸1 year ago

@WaysandMeansGOP HARD STOP! Yes, the cost of the tax stamp is an issue, but the real problem that everyone is pissed about is the unnecessary and unconstitutional registration of the suppressor. The NFA is a ridiculous and outdated idea. Abolish the NFA!

Bryan LaFonte's profile picture
Bryan LaFonte1 year ago

Your half-measure could end up making it MORE difficult to completely remove silencers from the NFA in the future.

GunsNewYork (In Exile)'s profile picture
GunsNewYork (In Exile)1 year ago

Why was the HPA language modified and this watering down included? And if the original language was problematic, was the parliamentarian consulted?

TexasSurplusPro 🇺🇸 🐊's profile picture
TexasSurplusPro 🇺🇸 🐊1 year ago

You could’ve just gone along with the Hearing Protection Act instead of trying to gaslight us. This is your fault. The blame lays squarely on you and the rest of the @WaysandMeansGOP. We’re not done lobbying for this yet.

Ferbz's profile picture
Ferbz1 year ago

I don’t want a lower or no tax. I want Suppressor, Short barrel rifles and short barrel shotguns OUT of the NFA. I don’t want a $0 tax, I want no NFA for these items. Pass the Hearing Protection Act as originally written out of committee and send it for a vote.

Rippinghawk's profile picture
Rippinghawk1 year ago

YOU had the ability to remove this "basic safety tool" from regulation and you decided not to. What did you get in return for not sticking to the goal? What has you compromised?

Travis R's profile picture
Travis R1 year ago

Pull suppressors from the NFA. WHY ARE YOU GAY.

Archie Little's profile picture
Archie Little1 year ago

@WaysandMeansGOP We The People want the Hearing Protection Act to be passed as written, completely out of the NFA. If the ATF can have suppressors for Heath & Safety, they We The People should be able to have them for the same reason. Failure will taken care of at the Voting booth!!!!

Gun Giveaway Tracker Guy 🔫's profile picture
Gun Giveaway Tracker Guy 🔫1 year ago

Your proposal? The original would have removed suppressors from the NFA entirely. It's still about control, and you are supporting that control. Dont act like this is your victory. This is an insult to the Second Amendment and to your constituents.

Related Videos

On 4th of July Independence Day, you should know the Income Tax was deemed Unconstitutional “There's no income tax in America until the Civil War. An emergency one Lincoln pushed after the Civil War, it's repealed 1892. They tried to have a peacetime income tax, it’s declared unconstitutional Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, the 16th Amendment in 1913. It's a 1% tax on the top 1% richest people in the country. It's not to tax the people, it’s to go after those robber barons. The Rockefellers, Carnegies, J. Paul Getty's, the Astors. It would be sort of like today that only Warren Buffett and Bill Gates and George Soros, that's what the tax is for. And so you have Taft, pushing through a corporate income tax. And only the extreme wealthy owned corporate stock, so it was a backdoor way to get at them. Teddy Roosevelt was responsible for inheritance tax, because only the extreme wealthy had an inheritance worth leaving. But finally, Woodrow Wilson pushes through the income tax, which is the 1% tax on the top 1% richest people.” And today this is all applied to everyone Let me clearly break down the order of events: During the Civil War era (1861–1872) The first federal income tax was enacted during the Civil War under Lincoln. It was a temporary wartime measure. It was repealed in 1872, The Supreme Court upheld it as constitutional in Springer v. United States In 1894 there was another peacetime attempt at an income tax. Congress passed a 2% tax on incomes over $4,000 as part of the Wilson-Gorman Tariff Act. The Supreme Court struck it down in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. They again said it was unconstitutional So next in 1913 Congress forces an income tax on us with the 16th Amendment But what else happened in 1913? The federal reserve was established We had a central banking takeover and that same year they passed the income tax to steal from all of us This should have never been allowed to happened, the income tax was ruled unconstitutional It’s time to set Americans free and abolish the income tax

Wall Street Apes

161,403 views • 1 month ago