Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Why Isn’t The Carnivore Diet Studied More Seriously A fair question: if a growing subgroup reports doing well on an all-meat approach, why isn’t it studied with the same curiosity as other diets? Good science should investigate anomalies, not dismiss them as “fad” by default. #Nutrition #CarnivoreDiet #DietResearch #EvidenceBased... show more

gary taubes

121,191 subscribers

28,505 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 CHARLES HOSKINSON ON WHY HE OPPOSES THE CRYPTO BILL "I guess we just have to pass a HORRIFIC TRASH bill that makes everything a security by default. This is NOT a good bill. If it starts as a security, what stops them from keeping it as a security forever?”

🚨 CHARLES HOSKINSON ON WHY HE OPPOSES THE CRYPTO BILL "I guess we just have to pass a HORRIFIC TRASH bill that makes everything a security by default. This is NOT a good bill. If it starts as a security, what stops them from keeping it as a security forever?”

Coin Bureau

70,374 views • 5 months ago

Who's Into Polyamory? Polyamory gets stereotyped a lot, but the people drawn to it are not all one type. The more interesting question is why some people are willing to question the relationship script they were handed. This video isn’t about saying polyamory is better or monogamy is outdated. It’s about looking at why some people choose different structures, what that requires emotionally, and why “normal” is not always the same thing as “right for you.”

Who's Into Polyamory? Polyamory gets stereotyped a lot, but the people drawn to it are not all one type. The more interesting question is why some people are willing to question the relationship script they were handed. This video isn’t about saying polyamory is better or monogamy is outdated. It’s about looking at why some people choose different structures, what that requires emotionally, and why “normal” is not always the same thing as “right for you.”

Kate Shelor

18,447 views • 6 days ago

I don’t even wanna have to keep dragging this annoying thing out but it’s driving me insane. The way he’s talking about it is as if he converted it which is not a good sign at all, not to mention if he did layer it, why isn’t he being more clear about it.

I don’t even wanna have to keep dragging this annoying thing out but it’s driving me insane. The way he’s talking about it is as if he converted it which is not a good sign at all, not to mention if he did layer it, why isn’t he being more clear about it.

Takoyaki Donuts

184,121 views • 8 months ago

The UK’s carbon rationing trial exposes the climate scam for what it truly is—a tool for control and profit, not science. Senator Malcolm Roberts warns: The UK’s trial of personal CO₂ allowances isn’t about saving the planet—it’s about controlling your diet, your life, and your wallet. Under this scheme, your daily CO₂ “allowance” would barely cover one mouthful of red meat—or a half-sized cooked breakfast—leaving nothing else for the day. This isn’t nutrition; it’s starvation by bureaucracy. The real agenda? Predatory billionaires like BlackRock and Bill Gates are snapping up farmland to push processed, chemical-laden fake meat—the same stuff found in pet food—while the elite trade carbon credits to keep living large. The rules never apply to those who write them. From Davos to your dinner plate, the war on livestock is a war on good nutrition, built on lies and greed. The climate cult isn’t about science—it’s about power, profit, and keeping you in line.

The UK’s carbon rationing trial exposes the climate scam for what it truly is—a tool for control and profit, not science. Senator Malcolm Roberts warns: The UK’s trial of personal CO₂ allowances isn’t about saving the planet—it’s about controlling your diet, your life, and your wallet. Under this scheme, your daily CO₂ “allowance” would barely cover one mouthful of red meat—or a half-sized cooked breakfast—leaving nothing else for the day. This isn’t nutrition; it’s starvation by bureaucracy. The real agenda? Predatory billionaires like BlackRock and Bill Gates are snapping up farmland to push processed, chemical-laden fake meat—the same stuff found in pet food—while the elite trade carbon credits to keep living large. The rules never apply to those who write them. From Davos to your dinner plate, the war on livestock is a war on good nutrition, built on lies and greed. The climate cult isn’t about science—it’s about power, profit, and keeping you in line.

Camus

17,666 views • 9 months ago

An 1830 historical book, Guru Bilas Padshahi, mentions that the Akal Takht was earlier referred to as “Vishnu ka Takht.” What’s more intriguing is that this book was once printed by the SGPC, but later withdrawn. Why was it taken back? Was it a historical detail, or an uncomfortable truth? History should be studied, not suppressed. Debate is healthy, silence is not. #HistoryMatters #AkalTakht #GuruBilasPadshahi #SikhHistory #QuestionsForSGPC #TruthInHistory

An 1830 historical book, Guru Bilas Padshahi, mentions that the Akal Takht was earlier referred to as “Vishnu ka Takht.” What’s more intriguing is that this book was once printed by the SGPC, but later withdrawn. Why was it taken back? Was it a historical detail, or an uncomfortable truth? History should be studied, not suppressed. Debate is healthy, silence is not. #HistoryMatters #AkalTakht #GuruBilasPadshahi #SikhHistory #QuestionsForSGPC #TruthInHistory

𝕄𝔾™

17,948 views • 7 months ago

🚨 WATCH THE SCRIPT COLLAPSE — LIVE ON AIR Australia’s Prime Minister was just confronted with the question that keeps coming back: Have you actually taken antisemitism seriously — and can you guarantee the safety of Jewish Australians? The answer was familiar. Committees. Envoys. Consultations. Process. And that’s the problem. Across the West, the same pattern repeats: You slammed Israel. You wrapped yourself in “Free Palestine” slogans. You spoke endlessly about Islamophobia. You downplayed antisemitism as a secondary concern. You treated warnings as politics. And then it happens again. An Islamophobia envoy is created alongside an antisemitism envoy — as if the threats are symmetrical, as if context doesn’t matter, as if reality can be managed by balance sheets and language games. This isn’t about words anymore. It’s about outcomes. When leaders respond to rising antisemitism with optics instead of enforcement, they don’t calm tensions — they signal hesitation. And hesitation is read as permission. This is why trust is collapsing. This is why the same questions keep being asked. This is why “we’re working on it” no longer works. The public isn’t looking for reassurance. They’re looking for resolve. And live on air, that absence was impossible to hide.

🚨 WATCH THE SCRIPT COLLAPSE — LIVE ON AIR Australia’s Prime Minister was just confronted with the question that keeps coming back: Have you actually taken antisemitism seriously — and can you guarantee the safety of Jewish Australians? The answer was familiar. Committees. Envoys. Consultations. Process. And that’s the problem. Across the West, the same pattern repeats: You slammed Israel. You wrapped yourself in “Free Palestine” slogans. You spoke endlessly about Islamophobia. You downplayed antisemitism as a secondary concern. You treated warnings as politics. And then it happens again. An Islamophobia envoy is created alongside an antisemitism envoy — as if the threats are symmetrical, as if context doesn’t matter, as if reality can be managed by balance sheets and language games. This isn’t about words anymore. It’s about outcomes. When leaders respond to rising antisemitism with optics instead of enforcement, they don’t calm tensions — they signal hesitation. And hesitation is read as permission. This is why trust is collapsing. This is why the same questions keep being asked. This is why “we’re working on it” no longer works. The public isn’t looking for reassurance. They’re looking for resolve. And live on air, that absence was impossible to hide.

Jim Ferguson

335,533 views • 7 months ago

Whoopi Goldberg dives into the abortion debate on The View, asking: “Why isn’t it my choice? Why are we being forced to go with your beliefs?” She then goes on to push back on the blatant lie that women are going in and getting abortions at 9 months. So my question is, why should laws be written based on the religious beliefs of a segment of society? Should we base out laws on science and not religion? Wouldn't that make a whole heck of a lot more sense? I don't what your religion telling me what is right and wrong.

Whoopi Goldberg dives into the abortion debate on The View, asking: “Why isn’t it my choice? Why are we being forced to go with your beliefs?” She then goes on to push back on the blatant lie that women are going in and getting abortions at 9 months. So my question is, why should laws be written based on the religious beliefs of a segment of society? Should we base out laws on science and not religion? Wouldn't that make a whole heck of a lot more sense? I don't what your religion telling me what is right and wrong.

Brian Krassenstein

5,076,877 views • 2 years ago

TGA: For adverse events following immunisation we do not routinely contact reporters or health professionals on adverse event outcomes. Senator: Why wouldn’t you follow up on reports of injury if you wanted to conduct surveillance of the safety of the vaccine? TGA: As you well know the TGA has received well over 140,000 adverse event reports for the vaccine, so it would not be practical to follow up on every individual report. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• So there’s too many injuries to follow up on but we will just continue to advocate the safety of the vaccine. Gotcha. If it’s not practical to follow up on every report then don’t roll out a vaccine with new technology to the entire population that hasn’t been adequately tested. How is the TGA meant to gauge the safety of the vaccine if it isn’t speaking to the victims about their injuries? Isn’t practical translates as not doing adequate testing and not caring about the people injured or killed. #auspol

TGA: For adverse events following immunisation we do not routinely contact reporters or health professionals on adverse event outcomes. Senator: Why wouldn’t you follow up on reports of injury if you wanted to conduct surveillance of the safety of the vaccine? TGA: As you well know the TGA has received well over 140,000 adverse event reports for the vaccine, so it would not be practical to follow up on every individual report. •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• So there’s too many injuries to follow up on but we will just continue to advocate the safety of the vaccine. Gotcha. If it’s not practical to follow up on every report then don’t roll out a vaccine with new technology to the entire population that hasn’t been adequately tested. How is the TGA meant to gauge the safety of the vaccine if it isn’t speaking to the victims about their injuries? Isn’t practical translates as not doing adequate testing and not caring about the people injured or killed. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

61,546 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: On Apple, you said if they do not make their iPhones in the U.S., you will hit them with a 25% tariff. Do you have the power to tariff a single company? Why would you want to hurt an American company? Trump: It would be more. It would also be Samsung and any other company that makes that product or it would not be fair

Reporter: On Apple, you said if they do not make their iPhones in the U.S., you will hit them with a 25% tariff. Do you have the power to tariff a single company? Why would you want to hurt an American company? Trump: It would be more. It would also be Samsung and any other company that makes that product or it would not be fair

Acyn

654,924 views • 1 year ago

While visiting grandmas house, the kids see some McDonald’s bags in the cabinet. As soon as they reach for it, grandma runs in and stops them from eating it. She tells them they were from when their mom was a kid. The food was there since 2004. They open the wrappers to inspect the food, besides an unpleasant smell, the food is mostly intact. There isn’t a speck of mold on it at all. This begs the question of how many preservatives and chemicals are in this, it’s not natural for food to not spoil and get moldy. Should she put it back in the cabinet to see if it ever actually spoils, knowing this, why would anyone even eat this anymore?

While visiting grandmas house, the kids see some McDonald’s bags in the cabinet. As soon as they reach for it, grandma runs in and stops them from eating it. She tells them they were from when their mom was a kid. The food was there since 2004. They open the wrappers to inspect the food, besides an unpleasant smell, the food is mostly intact. There isn’t a speck of mold on it at all. This begs the question of how many preservatives and chemicals are in this, it’s not natural for food to not spoil and get moldy. Should she put it back in the cabinet to see if it ever actually spoils, knowing this, why would anyone even eat this anymore?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

95,468 views • 6 months ago

Here’s a podcast about mitochondrial dysfunction. From all my years of using ketogenic diets like the lion diet for health, getting impacted by mold, experiencing SSRI induced withdrawal/damage, it finally appears like the root cause is mitochondrial dysfunction at a cellular level. The research into this is cutting edge and fascinating. Chris Masterjohn, a PhD in nutritional sciences, runs a mitochondrial testing company called Mitome and is unbelievably knowledgeable about mitochondrial dysfunction. We get into what serotonin is actually doing in your body, why SSRIs and benzodiazepines are actually mitochondrial drugs in ways nobody prescribing them understands, why the lion diet and other keto diets work from a biochemistry standpoint, why mega-dosing supplements can harm you, what B vitamins and red meat have to do with inflammation, how mold toxicity and food reactions can produce identical symptoms and more. This one is for anyone who has been chronically sick and wants to understand what’s going on at a cellular level.

Here’s a podcast about mitochondrial dysfunction. From all my years of using ketogenic diets like the lion diet for health, getting impacted by mold, experiencing SSRI induced withdrawal/damage, it finally appears like the root cause is mitochondrial dysfunction at a cellular level. The research into this is cutting edge and fascinating. Chris Masterjohn, a PhD in nutritional sciences, runs a mitochondrial testing company called Mitome and is unbelievably knowledgeable about mitochondrial dysfunction. We get into what serotonin is actually doing in your body, why SSRIs and benzodiazepines are actually mitochondrial drugs in ways nobody prescribing them understands, why the lion diet and other keto diets work from a biochemistry standpoint, why mega-dosing supplements can harm you, what B vitamins and red meat have to do with inflammation, how mold toxicity and food reactions can produce identical symptoms and more. This one is for anyone who has been chronically sick and wants to understand what’s going on at a cellular level.

Mikhaila Peterson

233,004 views • 3 months ago

Steven Crowder makes an excellent point He makes it clear as long as any person isn’t breaking the law, they should be allowed free speech and a platform People on the right being deemed “radical” aren’t even radical, they’re just responding to what’s been pushed against us “if these people are radical, and I don't know that they are, that's why I'd like to have a conversation with them, we do need to ask what radicalized them.” As soon as people start being deplatformed and shut out of the conversation, that opens the door for liberals to do it on a national scale again

Steven Crowder makes an excellent point He makes it clear as long as any person isn’t breaking the law, they should be allowed free speech and a platform People on the right being deemed “radical” aren’t even radical, they’re just responding to what’s been pushed against us “if these people are radical, and I don't know that they are, that's why I'd like to have a conversation with them, we do need to ask what radicalized them.” As soon as people start being deplatformed and shut out of the conversation, that opens the door for liberals to do it on a national scale again

Wall Street Apes

130,675 views • 8 months ago

Ah yes. Another heroic contribution to history. A comedian writes a book on Pakistan and the very idea of Pakistan while cheerfully admitting he has never studied South Asian history. The ignorance is at least honest. The confidence is limitless. It is almost admirable. Why trouble yourself with facts when vibes are enough. Who needs to understand Congress and Muslim League politics, British policy or Partition when you can string together opinions and sell them as ideas. Research is an outdated inconvenience. By this logic I should write a book on quantum physics after scrolling through a few reels and proudly declaring I never studied science. Transparency would be applauded. Accuracy would be optional. Pakistan Lost indeed. Lost somewhere between intellectual laziness and literary ambition.

Ah yes. Another heroic contribution to history. A comedian writes a book on Pakistan and the very idea of Pakistan while cheerfully admitting he has never studied South Asian history. The ignorance is at least honest. The confidence is limitless. It is almost admirable. Why trouble yourself with facts when vibes are enough. Who needs to understand Congress and Muslim League politics, British policy or Partition when you can string together opinions and sell them as ideas. Research is an outdated inconvenience. By this logic I should write a book on quantum physics after scrolling through a few reels and proudly declaring I never studied science. Transparency would be applauded. Accuracy would be optional. Pakistan Lost indeed. Lost somewhere between intellectual laziness and literary ambition.

Arvind Saharan

79,066 views • 5 months ago

🇱🇧 A Christian border town in Lebanon says it survived the war by doing one thing: refusing to let Hezbollah in. While much of southern Lebanon became Hezbollah territory by default, this community held its ground, kept the militia out, and came out the other side. That's not a small thing in a country where defying Hezbollah often comes with consequences. It also raises a bigger question: if one town can do it, why couldn't others? The answer probably has more to do with geography, demographics, and outside backing than sheer willpower. But the story matters. Hezbollah's grip on Lebanon has always been presented as total. Stories like this complicate that picture. Source: Fox News, AFP

🇱🇧 A Christian border town in Lebanon says it survived the war by doing one thing: refusing to let Hezbollah in. While much of southern Lebanon became Hezbollah territory by default, this community held its ground, kept the militia out, and came out the other side. That's not a small thing in a country where defying Hezbollah often comes with consequences. It also raises a bigger question: if one town can do it, why couldn't others? The answer probably has more to do with geography, demographics, and outside backing than sheer willpower. But the story matters. Hezbollah's grip on Lebanon has always been presented as total. Stories like this complicate that picture. Source: Fox News, AFP

Mario Nawfal

26,094 views • 2 months ago

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.

Joe Tippens

74,195 views • 4 months ago

Subversion works best when you don’t notice it. Media is a key delivery system because it can slowly retrain a public’s instincts, until people treat the subverter’s values as “good” and “normal,” and start doubting their own. Demoralization comes first because it weakens judgment while still feeling like everyday life. Media doesn’t just report. It trains interpretation: what counts as scandal, what counts as nothing, and which questions are respectable. It can bury a story by starving it of attention, or “cover” it with contempt so curiosity feels embarrassing. That’s why selective coverage isn’t a minor flaw. It’s the mechanism. The issue isn’t only that facts go missing. It’s that the audience is trained in advance on what deserves notice and what deserves ridicule. Over time, people stop processing information to understand and start processing it to belong. So when you see major outlets treat allegations against the left as unworthy of attention and treat curiosity as the offense, focus on the pattern, not the single story. Ask who gets investigation, and who gets “nothing to see here.” That’s the tell. Once a public learns to self-censor its own curiosity, the job is mostly done.

Subversion works best when you don’t notice it. Media is a key delivery system because it can slowly retrain a public’s instincts, until people treat the subverter’s values as “good” and “normal,” and start doubting their own. Demoralization comes first because it weakens judgment while still feeling like everyday life. Media doesn’t just report. It trains interpretation: what counts as scandal, what counts as nothing, and which questions are respectable. It can bury a story by starving it of attention, or “cover” it with contempt so curiosity feels embarrassing. That’s why selective coverage isn’t a minor flaw. It’s the mechanism. The issue isn’t only that facts go missing. It’s that the audience is trained in advance on what deserves notice and what deserves ridicule. Over time, people stop processing information to understand and start processing it to belong. So when you see major outlets treat allegations against the left as unworthy of attention and treat curiosity as the offense, focus on the pattern, not the single story. Ask who gets investigation, and who gets “nothing to see here.” That’s the tell. Once a public learns to self-censor its own curiosity, the job is mostly done.

Yuri Bezmenov's Ghost

154,720 views • 7 months ago

Asmongold warns against treating political opponents as good faith actors "I've said it a million times and I'll say it a million more. These people don't have any values. They just simply have goals." "If you treat them as people with values and you capitulate to having a moral or ethical understanding with them, the only reason they want that is so they can take advantage of you. It's so they can subvert you or use that value against you." "To the extent that you find yourself on the same side as them, you should be asking yourself why. You can never have shared values with these people. If it was up to them, you'd be in jail."

Asmongold warns against treating political opponents as good faith actors "I've said it a million times and I'll say it a million more. These people don't have any values. They just simply have goals." "If you treat them as people with values and you capitulate to having a moral or ethical understanding with them, the only reason they want that is so they can take advantage of you. It's so they can subvert you or use that value against you." "To the extent that you find yourself on the same side as them, you should be asking yourself why. You can never have shared values with these people. If it was up to them, you'd be in jail."

Asmongold Updates

17,046 views • 6 days ago

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it. 👇

REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment. Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells. On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months. This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans. But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions. Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line? If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it. 👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

91,130 views • 5 months ago