Darwin to Jesus
@darwintojesus • 77,305 subscribers
Lifelong atheist who found Jesus Christ. Husband and father. Exposing the lies and fallacies of Atheism, proclaiming the truth of Christianity.
Shorts
Videos
The moment we found DNA contained information, that was a wrap for atheism.
Darwin to Jesus176,085 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
I genuinely love watching atheists try to talk around this.
Darwin to Jesus559,481 просмотров • 1 год назад
Stephen Meyer explains why Dawkin’s parsimony argument against God is total nonsense.
Darwin to Jesus80,589 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
One tiny cell of your DNA stores 3 billion letters of code, that’s enough information to fill about a thousand books. DNA is stored so compactly and efficiently that if we unraveled all the DNA in your body it would stretch to Pluto and back. When a cell divides and the DNA is copied, there are almost zero mistakes… only 1 per billion* digits. That’s like copying the entire encyclopedia Britannica hundreds of times without a single mistake. I don’t have enough faith to be an atheist. Do you?
Darwin to Jesus129,045 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
“There’s no empirical evidence of a singularity” There can’t be. The singularity is where the laws of physics break down. Phil Halper is conflating “no empirical evidence” with no evidence, as if they’re the same thing. They aren’t. We can draw rational inferences about things in the world even without empirical evidence. For example, we rationally inferred the existence of dark matter, is there empirical evidence that dark matter exists? No there isn’t. We also rationally infer that other humans have minds, is there empirical evidence that other humans have minds? Absolutely not.
Darwin to Jesus34,380 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
“If God can be eternal, why can’t the universe?” This is why:
Darwin to Jesus112,151 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад
Reminder: This is what the 🏳️🌈 movement has always been about.
Darwin to Jesus206,136 просмотров • 1 год назад
Interesting argument. If we were to steel man this and represent it as a syllogism I think it would look like this: 1. God is perfect 2. A perfect being would only create perfect things 3. The world is imperfect 4. Therefore, a perfect God could not have created this world ...And then we'd further conclude a perfect God doesn't exist. The problem is with premise two, for a number of reasons. Firstly, what does it mean to be perfect? To be perfect is to lack for nothing, to be without flaws, to be fully actualized. But only God is like that, so the only way for God to make something perfect would be to make another God exactly like Himself. But there's a problem with this because the second God couldn't be exactly the same since he had to be created, rather than simply existing by his very nature. So logically speaking God can't create something perfect. This means that if* God creates, God can only create things that are imperfect. So now that we've established that God can't make something perfect, I guess the question is... why would God create? Here's a thought. Ontologically speaking God is the greatest conceivable being... would the greatest conceivable being create things? Or not create things? It seems obvious that creating is greater than not creating. An artist that creates no art wouldn't be much of an artist. If this is correct, it means God will create, and from my first argument God will create something imperfect... something flawed. Something lacking. Another thing worth pointing out is that as humans we knowingly create imperfect beings. We know when a baby is born, it's not perfect... yet we choose to do it anyway. Why? Is our desire to bring new life into the world something evil or wicked? I don't think so. I think it comes from our love for each other and our understanding that giving life is a blessing, even if that child screws up, even if they suffer, their life is a blessing. If God is good, wouldn't He want to bless something with the gift of life, the same way we do? I don't see why not. From this I think it follows that if God exists we'd expect to be in some sort of imperfect or flawed reality, and that's exactly what we find ourselves in. But how does atheism explain the existence of a flawed world? To say that something is flawed is to say it's not how it should be. But how can the world be flawed if atheism is true? On atheism the world just... is. It's not meant to be any sort of way. To be consistent the atheist would have to say reality isn't flawed, which is obviously absurd. This means that not only can Christianity explain the world we find ourselves in, it predicts it logically. Atheism on the other hand would have to predict a totally neutral world with no flaws, no issues, no evil... and no one in their right mind would say that's the world we find ourselves in. So this argument not only fails, it gives us more great reasons to reject atheism.
Darwin to Jesus57,618 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад
My children are watching this show called "Wild Kratts" that teaches them about animals. At one point mongoose fights and kills a cobra. One of the characters feels sad for the cobra, but his brother says, "this is just how nature works, predator and prey, there's no bad guys." So why are humans so different? On an atheist worldview humans are just another animal, and we’re also a part of nature. So when a man rapes a woman there's no bad guy... there's just predator and prey, right?
Darwin to Jesus21,088 просмотров • 1 месяц назад
Alex O’Conner went off on “I just believe in one less God” slogan.
Darwin to Jesus86,037 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад