Brian Walshe Cellebrite extraction testimony via MSP trooper Connor... Keefe from NDAO. Trooper Keefe (just like Nick Guarino) testified today that the “timestamp” on a Cellebrite extraction is the “TIME THE SEARCH OCCURRED” Jen McCabe: 0 NDAO: 2 Jen McCabe is FUCKED.show more

Nick Guarino tells the jurors in the Brian Walshe... trial that the “last visited date/time” is the “last time the user last accessed the website” Thanks for confirming Jen McCabe googled “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am, Nick 👍🏼show more

The look Brian Albert gives Jen McCabe when she... is asked about making the Google search is so telling to me. Look at that shit! And even worse HER ANSWER! #KarenReadIsFree #KARENREADISNOTGUILTY #McAlbertsshow more

FACT CHECK: Here at the first trial, the Commonwealth’s... own expert witness, Ian Whiffin, confirms the necessity & importance of hash values for the sake of “hash verification”, a necessary step in authenticating the data & being able to verify that it hasn’t been altered or manipulated. In fact, Whiffin actually gives this testimony in response to a question about when the data have been altered or tampered with, if there’s a way for the forensic examiner (him) to detect it, and/or verify its authenticity and integrity. Remarkably, despite the DFIR industry standard methodology of hash verifying a digital forensic extraction, like that of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, prior to conducting any analysis on it with any forensic tools, Ian Whiffin testified that notably, for his work on this case, not only did he abandon this standard methodology, but he also admitted that the forensic extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone, which he received from the Commonwealth, was stripped of its hash value. Perhaps more remarkably, this stunning fact apparently didn’t raise any red flags for Ian Whiffin when conducting his analysis in this case, where he’s providing testimony in a murder trial. One must ask themselves why that is? However, defense expert Richard Green, in his affidavit, states that: “Typically, forensic examiners are provided with the raw image file and the associated: hash value documentation together. After validating the hash value, I would then accept that the data has not been manipulated. Here, however, the hash documentation was not provided with the raw image of the cell phone. Instead, it was withheld from the defense. As a forensic examiner having received hundreds of imaged phones over the course of my decades-long career, this was unprecedented.” Contrary to Mr. Whiffin’s approach, upon initially receiving a purported extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone without a hash value to authenticate and verify the integrity of the data, Mr. Green promptly requested the hash value and corresponding GrayKey supplemental files from the Commonwealth in order to conduct his analysis. After making this demand, and when the Commonwealth had to produce the hash verification data for Jen McCabe’s iPhone, remarkably, the Commonwealth also produced—for the first time, and over a year later on February 8, 2023—the Full File System Extraction of Jen McCabe’s iPhone (see “Notice of Discovery VIII,” attached). Unlike the initial purported “extraction” produced by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, this one contained Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search and all of the manual deletions of her communications, among other incriminating evidence, surrounding the murder of Officer John O’Keefe (see defense’s Rule 17 motion from April 12, 2023, attached). So, this begs the question: If Ian Whiffin knows the importance of hash verification in validating the authenticity of the data he’s working with in the first place, then why didn’t he take the same actions as defense expert Richard Green did to responsibly and reliably provide analysis in this case? If Whiffin ought to be deemed an expert, qualified to provide analysis and testimony at trial, then why did he abandon his industry’s standard methodology of hash verification in this case? Even Cellebrite knows this is a no-no! What say you? #KarenReadTrial #Cellebrite #DFIRshow more

The people who said Bryan Kohberger was innocent, who... blamed Dylan, Bethany, and their friends were just as sure that they were the guilty ones as the FKR crowd is about Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Brian Higgins and Colin Albert. Both groups DEMANDING confessions from everyone other than the accused. Threatening others, slandering others, harassing others. See the pattern? Do you ever stop and ask: how is it always “someone else” and never the person actually arrested? All of them love to say “Karen/Bryan could be you,” but so could Dylan, Bethany, Jen, Brian, Colin…blamed for murder just for being a friend…or for simply just being there. Do better. Be better. If this is you, you are not a sleuth…you are just an asshole.show more

“I can’t end it like this.” Alan Jackson has... made a complete jackass of himself today, desperately trying to trip up Jen McCabe. The judge has had enough of him and his antics. The truth is the truth—no matter how long you badger someone or how hard you try to spin it, it won’t change.show more

Jen McCabe was truthful and honest. To try and... trip someone up regarding the people she called after a traumatizing event is silly, especially since she went to the trouble to contact the agent and clarify those calls which were to her brother-in-law, a friend, and her victim witness advocate. It's not like she contacted her Dad and an attorney... Alan Jackson also slipped in the word Agents, whenever he got the chance, despite the judge's ruling. Finally, what is the over under on Alan Jackson getting Jen McCabe to emphasize that Karen Read said, "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him! Putting the over under at 9. Read admits she said she hit him, by the way. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2show more

#KarenRead Karen's greatest loss of this "whole thing" is... the loss of her "reputation". It's all about image for her. John O'Keefe lost his life, Karen. A human life is far more important than your ego. What about the innocent witnesses you selfishly destroyed Karen? Do you care at all how you've purposefully damaged their reputations? Brian Albert, Jen McCabe, and Colin Albert would like a word.show more

Karen Read's taillight was in tact at 5:42am on... 1/29/22. New video from Pequitside Farm in Canton shows Karen's SUV being followed by Kerry Robert's vehicle. Jen McCabe is driving Karen's Lexus which is confirmed via John O'Keefe's surveillance footage mere minutes later. For time reference, they are driving from Jen's house back to John's. This was 20 minutes before pulling up to 34 Fairview Rd. The footage shows the very taillight that was later seen obliterated in photographs at the Canton Sallyport. The damage sustained would create a much different light pattern than what's shown in this video. A reminder: John's last steps occurred at 12:31am. If the Commonwealth's theory was correct, the taillight would've been damaged at that time.. and that is not what is seen via this footage 5 hours later.show more

Key Cycle 01162- NO “Sudden Braking” Trigger Below you... see Trooper Paul’s testing. As you see he travels in reverse and slams the brakes, causing a “sudden braking” trigger to record. In fact, 4 separate times he does this and a trigger is recorded each time. On key cycle 01162 however, we see ZERO “sudden braking” triggers recorded. Welcher claimed today that Karen’s SUV was traveling 23.9 MPH in reverse when the “trigger data stopped recording”. Based on Jen McCabes testimony, we can conclude that since there is no “sudden braking” trigger on key cycle 01162- that means that Karen’s SUV would have reversed directly into Brian Higgins Jeep and left no damage to her SUV. Amazing.show more

Priceless... The 2:27 Google search by Jen McCabe never... happened, and the defense is seceding this point. Karen Read says it was addressed by Ian Whiffin, the CW's expert. She says they won't call their expert, who started the falsehood that there was a 2:27 search. They recognize "expert" Green's incompetence. Read hit John and left him to die. I do believe initially she thought John might get up. She was drunk, and her judgment was impaired. She said she hit him that morning and repeated it during numerous interviews. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrialshow more

BREAKING: Trooper Nicholas Guarino just testified that #KarenRead’s cellphone... data showed that her phone connected to the WiFi at Officer #JohnOKeefe’s house at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am after she dropped John off at the after party at 34 Fairview Road. This is further evidence exonerating Karen Read given the Commonwealth’s theory states that she struck and killed Officer O’Keefe outside of 34 Fairview with her vehicle at 12:45am. The Commonwealth’s theory that Jen McCabe still saw Karen Read’s vehicle in front of 34 Fairview at 12:40 and 12:45am, as reflected by Jen’s text messages to John O’Keefe’s cellphone in which she’s acting like she still sees him/Karen’s car outside, is completely destroyed by Karen Read’s cellphone data, home WiFi network & router data, and Ring camera footage—all of which establish she was long gone from 34 Fairview by that time and had already arrived back home. Therefore, Karen Read did not and could not have killed Officer O’Keefe. Therefore, that’s further direct evidence of #JenMcCabe’s concerted efforts to fabricate a timeline, mislead investigators and ultimately frame Karen Read, similar to her attempt to blame her 2:27am incriminating Google search on Read. #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruptionshow more

If you believe that none of the people leaving... 34 Fairview, some of which saw the Lexus near the flagpole & knew John O’Keefe was coming over, saw John’s body in the yard … then why is it so out of the realm of possibility that Lucky didn’t see him either? I mean he confirmed what all these people said which is that they didn’t see John laying in the yard by the flag pole: •Jennifer McCabe •Matt McCabe •Brian Higgins •Sarah Levinson •Julie Nagel •Ryan Nagel •Caitlin Albert •Tristin Morris It’s interesting to see the same testimony “I didn’t see a body” considered differently by various people. The video below mimics the exact movements of the McCabe vehicle as they were leaving the house that night. Jen & the 2 girls in the back might’ve been engaged in a conversation & maybe weren’t paying attention. Matt, however, would have been looking straight ahead as he was driving. When he switched gears from reverse to drive, the vehicle would be still & his headlights would have been shining DIRECTLY on John’s body. So did he not see John’s body because John wasn’t there? Or is he lying about not seeing John laying there? Help me understand. #KarenReadshow more

It looks like we may have just figured out... where Attorney Marc Diller got his original “Exhibit J”... And the answer is Jen McCabe’s best friend. 😱 Attorney Marc Diller’s first version of “Exhibit J” was the exhibit he filed in support of his motion for a Temporary Restraining Order to prevent Karen Read from getting her cell phones back from the Norfolk County DA’s Office. In multiple posts after the March 6th hearing, Kerry can be seen sharing the very exhibit that attorneys Diller, Rosenberg, and Seligson referenced in their filings over the past few weeks. In the video she posted, the tweet in question appears at the beginning, followed by screenshots that are described as coming from an alleged phone extraction. We can confirm this appears to be the original version of Exhibit J (before Diller later attempted to substitute a different version while still labeling it “Exhibit J”) because it matches exactly how Seligson described it in Read’s filing. In his response, Seligson states the exhibit is: 🔹 a partial screenshot of a tweet originally posted by Sean McDonough 🔹 includes a quote stating the recording was a “one-party consent call” 🔹 contains the audio of the call itself 🔹 matches the image of the exhibit included in the court filing All of those elements are in the version Kerry has been circulating online. This includes a comment on a Boston Fox 25 post. Ms. Drama Llama has publicly stated many times that she is close with Jen McCabe and communicates with witnesses as well as members of the O’Keefe family. She also appears regularly on a YouTube channel promoting “Justice for JJ” content and the Albert/McCabe/Higgins defense fund. As recently as Friday, she was seemingly publicly speaking about an opinion from the O'Keefe family in regards to a photo of John being posted (that she, herself, posted first). This could also explain why Attorney Diller may have considered the material reliable given that Kerry appears to be a trusted voice within the O’Keefe/McCabe circle. Now the question is, why is the best friend of a key witness seemingly inserting herself into active civil litigation by circulating exhibits connected to court filings? 🤔show more

Kerry Roberts complained about being a “victim” of “harassment”... for “the crime of telling the truth” yesterday on Good Morning America. Then she took the witness stand & admitted to lying under oath & committing perjury at a grand jury to protect Jen McCabe. The Feds are the ONLY reason we know this information. What does that tell you? These witnesses are comfortable lying under oath at the state grand jury because they know they’ve got immunity from DA Michael Morrissey’s Office. They’re protected. But suddenly, once under investigation by the Feds, and under the threat of federal perjury charges while on the witness stand at a federal grand jury, a whole lot of admissions and truth started coming out. This is also why Brian Higgins testified (at the federal grand jury) that he saw someone, that fit John O’Keefe’s criteria, enter the house. Higgins didn’t know what the Feds knew at the time, and being an ATF agent, he’s surely well aware of the fact that he could be facing prison time for lying to a federal agent. The only reason Kerry Roberts changed her testimony and told the truth—that she never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google anything—was because she knew she no longer had the protection of her friends at the federal grand jury. This is what the general public finds so outrageous about these “witnesses”. It’s how they brazenly lie to your face to frame an innocent woman for a murder she did not commit, and then if you dare call them on it, they have to make themselves “victims” by whining and crying about “hawassment” and “witness intimidation”. The public is going to be critical and unfavorable of you when you willingly lie to coverup and frame someone else for murder. That’s a necessary age-old aspect of society called “shame”. If you don’t like it, don’t lie or do shameful things. It’s really that simple. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefeshow more

In one of the greatest examples of “Fuck Around... and Find Out” these eyes have ever seen… Jen McCabe just read a text her husband Matt sent to her, her sister, and Brian Albert: “If she (Karen) pleads out, it will end. If she fights it, it will be an episode” The McAlberts thought Karen Read would fold. A corrupt MSP thought she’d take the fall. A dirty DA’s office thought she wouldn’t fight for her freedom. But for 3+ years, Karen Read has stood toe-to-toe with all these monsters. And guess what? She’s winning. They fucked with the wrong woman. She should be an inspiration to little girls everywhere.show more

Blatantly lying, but why? - The Jeep “Did you... know about a Jeep being on the road?” - Alessi “I had seen testimony to that, but the MAJORITY of the testimony was that there were no other vehicles” - Welcher Key word- “MAJORITY” 3 witnesses said there was a jeep- Jen &Matt McCabe, Higgins 3 say no jeep- Ricky, Maxon, Nagel So Welcher, please explain how 3 yes and 3 Nos = Majority say no Jeep? The reason he didn’t put the Jeep there is because he knows Karen would have backed directly into it. He lied to avoid this issue. Here’s the bigger issue- if there was no Jeep there & Welcher believed Maxon, Nagel & Ricky who were OUTSIDE the house- then why would the people IN the house be lying about the Jeep? #FreeKarenReadshow more

In her article, Gretchen Voss goes into detail about... a lacrosse game that Aidan Kearney attended in an attempt to speak with Jennifer McCabe. It is clear that Voss likely spoke with Jen herself about that incident. What Voss mysteriously leaves out are the other occasions at sporting events where Jen herself treated other parents with complete disrespect. Below, I attached a video of fellow witness Tom Beatty, who Jen called seven times within 30 minutes on the morning of January 29, 2022. In the video, you can hear Jen tell him, "No one wants you here." Tom, who was simply trying to find a seat on the bleachers, brushed it off. As a reminder, Jen also called Tom's daughter, Erin, the morning of the 29th. Colin Albert did as well, except earlier at 12:33 AM. That timing has raised eyebrows because it would have been just one minute after John O'Keefe's phone reportedly stopped moving at 34 Fairview Road. Due to this, Erin was also subjected to similar harassment. Canton mothers who were upset that Erin had spoken about the missed call from Colin, and who are reportedly friends of Jen, told her to be quiet and put male genitalia in her mouth. Another example came to light through public records requests. This one came from Trial 1 sidebar discussions, which are private conversations between the attorneys and the judge outside the presence of the jury. During one of those sidebars, attorney Alan Jackson raised an incident involving Jen and another witness, Karina Kolokithas. He told Judge Cannone that he viewed Jen's conduct as a threat toward Karina. What happened next was even more interesting. After the public saw that sidebar transcript, women who openly support Jennifer McCabe posted private text messages between Karina and another friend of Jen's from the days immediately following John O'Keefe's death. In those messages, Karina was questioning how any of this could have happened. The women who posted them attempted to frame the texts as proof that Karina could not be trusted and that she was a flip-flopper. Even to this day, these women post similar verbiage. Instead, they highlighted a pattern. Every time something negative comes out about Jen, private messages somehow surface or the facts are twisted in a way that makes Jen appear to be the trustworthy one. And those text messages that were used in an attempt to smear Karina? They came from Jen's close friend, Meg Kennedy. We now know that because another public records request revealed that Meg emailed those exact messages to Massachusetts State Police Lieutenant Brian Tully on February 19, 2025, just before the second trial. Meg was present during Karina's testimony. Unfortunately for her, Special Prosecutor Hank Brennan chose not to use the messages. Oh, and let's not forget that Meg's husband, Larry Kennedy, appears in the Proctor text messages. He was once close with Michael Proctor and expressed racist sentiments similar to those attributed to his friend. But apparently none of the above was important to Voss and her reporting...show more