Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A 23-year-old game modder from Prague uploaded one image of a battle axe into Claude Opus 4.8 and built a $6,200/month 3D asset factory without opening a single modeling tab he let the model write the entire geometry script for Blender from scratch the workflow that prints ready-to-sell assets:... > reference upload: drop a high-res weapon concept into the chat window > reasoning layer: Claude Opus 4.8 analyzes the edges, weight distribution, and scale > code generation: the model spits out a flawless python script in 13 minutes using 5,000 tokens > render loop: the code executes inside Blender, auto-generating complex 3D meshes with surface imperfections he found a minor shading bug, fixed it manually in 40 seconds, and uploaded the finished axe to TurboSquid and Sketchfab Earnings breakout: Week 1 > $1,120 Week 2 > $1,450 Week 3 > $1,780 Week 4 > $1,850 1 month > $6,200 net profit > most 3D artists are still spending 14 hours extruding vertices manually and crying about industry layoffs he bypassed the entire pipeline for the price of an API keyshow more

Mr. Buzzoni

22,869 subscribers

24,497 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A 20-year-old guy earned $37,250 in a month creating YouTube content and barely even touches the editing software. He set up an autonomous "content factory" where Claude acts as the brain and Premiere Pro serves as the body. The system works 24/7 while he lives his life. Claude analyzes high-CPM niches, writes scripts, and uses Python scripts to trigger voiceovers and video generation. In the first month alone, one of his channels hit hundreds of thousands of views on Shorts. One client video ($400) -> 15 minutes of AI work = $400 profit. 20 videos per week = $8,000. He simply had an idea, and Claude took care of everything: from the first word of the script to the final render.

A 20-year-old guy earned $37,250 in a month creating YouTube content and barely even touches the editing software. He set up an autonomous "content factory" where Claude acts as the brain and Premiere Pro serves as the body. The system works 24/7 while he lives his life. Claude analyzes high-CPM niches, writes scripts, and uses Python scripts to trigger voiceovers and video generation. In the first month alone, one of his channels hit hundreds of thousands of views on Shorts. One client video ($400) -> 15 minutes of AI work = $400 profit. 20 videos per week = $8,000. He simply had an idea, and Claude took care of everything: from the first word of the script to the final render.

shmidt

1,871,920 views • 4 months ago

A 23 year old girl from Detroit who has 2 children asked Claude how can I make money if I only have 5 free hours a week? He gave an answer and her income per month amounted to $14,560 on children's toys Claude + Shopify = automated dropshipping Investments are a subscription to Claude for $20 -> the rest is only profit Claude invents a niche for products analyzing popular directions , creates clickable descriptions , generates photos and videos that stand out among the rest A person pays for the order -> Claude buys on Aliexpress cheaper by 50-60% -> the package goes to the buyer In essence it is a store managed by a manager instead of you you only receive profit spending up to 5 hours a week on this Income: 1 week > $2,458 2 week > $5,659 3 week > $9,825 1 month > $14,560 The full instruction is already in the public access

A 23 year old girl from Detroit who has 2 children asked Claude how can I make money if I only have 5 free hours a week? He gave an answer and her income per month amounted to $14,560 on children's toys Claude + Shopify = automated dropshipping Investments are a subscription to Claude for $20 -> the rest is only profit Claude invents a niche for products analyzing popular directions , creates clickable descriptions , generates photos and videos that stand out among the rest A person pays for the order -> Claude buys on Aliexpress cheaper by 50-60% -> the package goes to the buyer In essence it is a store managed by a manager instead of you you only receive profit spending up to 5 hours a week on this Income: 1 week > $2,458 2 week > $5,659 3 week > $9,825 1 month > $14,560 The full instruction is already in the public access

Bober_smart

11,482 views • 4 months ago

I plugged ChatGPT Luna 5.6 and Claude Opus 5 into Blender through MCP, and one of them is one-shotting entire 3D scenes now. Top is Luna 5.6 in fast mode modeling ship cannons with a firing animation. Watching the scene grow mesh by mesh in real time is a separate kind of dopamine. Bottom is Opus 5 building a full carriage scene with terrain, rocks and lighting. This one is simply built for 3D -- the whole thing from a single prompt with zero retries and zero corrections. The entire bridge is one open-source repo, no Python and no modeling skills required: > The repo is with 16.9k stars under MIT license. > It works with any model -- Claude, GPT, Cursor, any MCP client. > The model sees your scene through a live socket and edits it in real time. A year ago this workflow didn't exist, and now the gap between an idea and a rendered 3D scene is one prompt. Save this one -- you will come back for the repo ↓

I plugged ChatGPT Luna 5.6 and Claude Opus 5 into Blender through MCP, and one of them is one-shotting entire 3D scenes now. Top is Luna 5.6 in fast mode modeling ship cannons with a firing animation. Watching the scene grow mesh by mesh in real time is a separate kind of dopamine. Bottom is Opus 5 building a full carriage scene with terrain, rocks and lighting. This one is simply built for 3D -- the whole thing from a single prompt with zero retries and zero corrections. The entire bridge is one open-source repo, no Python and no modeling skills required: > The repo is with 16.9k stars under MIT license. > It works with any model -- Claude, GPT, Cursor, any MCP client. > The model sees your scene through a live socket and edits it in real time. A year ago this workflow didn't exist, and now the gap between an idea and a rendered 3D scene is one prompt. Save this one -- you will come back for the repo ↓

slash1s

150,102 views • 2 months ago

MANUAL 3D PRODUCT PHOTOGRAPHY IS OFFICIALLY OPTIONAL NOW built a photorealistic product render pipeline inside Claude Code that eliminates studio setup, manual lighting rigs, and manual camera passes - while keeping full physical accuracy, not AI guessed geometry Here is the exact stack: Blender MCP - official Anthropic connector, exposes Blender's entire Python API, Claude writes and runs bpy scripts directly against the live scene Image to 3D Pipeline - turns a single product photo into a textured mesh, automatic UV unwrap included, no manual retopology Lighting + Camera Automation - describe the mood in plain English, Claude scripts the rig: three point studio, softbox wrap, rotating turntable Render Farm Orchestration - batch queue across distributed nodes, one command, dozens of angles rendered unattended Core advantage: describe the change once, in plain language, and Claude applies it across every matching object in the scene - rename a hundred assets to studio convention, swap one shared material across every prop, seconds instead of an afternoon of clicking Claude Code doesn't guess the geometry It writes the actual Python that Blender executes same engine a studio artist would use, same physically based render Pass a product photo Claude builds the mesh, rigs the lights, sets the camera path, and renders a full 360 turntable zero manual keyframing, zero manual scene setup full below

MANUAL 3D PRODUCT PHOTOGRAPHY IS OFFICIALLY OPTIONAL NOW built a photorealistic product render pipeline inside Claude Code that eliminates studio setup, manual lighting rigs, and manual camera passes - while keeping full physical accuracy, not AI guessed geometry Here is the exact stack: Blender MCP - official Anthropic connector, exposes Blender's entire Python API, Claude writes and runs bpy scripts directly against the live scene Image to 3D Pipeline - turns a single product photo into a textured mesh, automatic UV unwrap included, no manual retopology Lighting + Camera Automation - describe the mood in plain English, Claude scripts the rig: three point studio, softbox wrap, rotating turntable Render Farm Orchestration - batch queue across distributed nodes, one command, dozens of angles rendered unattended Core advantage: describe the change once, in plain language, and Claude applies it across every matching object in the scene - rename a hundred assets to studio convention, swap one shared material across every prop, seconds instead of an afternoon of clicking Claude Code doesn't guess the geometry It writes the actual Python that Blender executes same engine a studio artist would use, same physically based render Pass a product photo Claude builds the mesh, rigs the lights, sets the camera path, and renders a full 360 turntable zero manual keyframing, zero manual scene setup full below

YARD

20,091 views • 1 month ago

I'm not a 3d modeler. I barely know how to open blender let alone do anything functional in it. But with the siddharth ahuja blender MCP and Claude I was able to vibe code an entire environment for my upcoming grow a garden game in Portals Claude used the MCP to assemble and arrange every single asset in this space (i literally don't even know how to import an asset into blender lol) within the spawn of a few hours and with access to a folder of low poly assets. When I had it start doing its own modeling, it even matched the style of the environment to keep things consistent If you are building UGC games and you don't know anything about modeling or design like me, you gotta try it out...

I'm not a 3d modeler. I barely know how to open blender let alone do anything functional in it. But with the siddharth ahuja blender MCP and Claude I was able to vibe code an entire environment for my upcoming grow a garden game in Portals Claude used the MCP to assemble and arrange every single asset in this space (i literally don't even know how to import an asset into blender lol) within the spawn of a few hours and with access to a folder of low poly assets. When I had it start doing its own modeling, it even matched the style of the environment to keep things consistent If you are building UGC games and you don't know anything about modeling or design like me, you gotta try it out...

Hugh MFER (PORTALS Guy)

180,963 views • 8 months ago

5 weeks ago, this fishing game didn’t exist. Now it has a full 3D world, dynamic water, day/night cycles, fishing mechanics, rarity systems, custom UI and even its own in-game editors. Almost everything is being built with AI. Claude handles most of the game, Claude + Blender MCP handles 3D work, and ChatGPT helps with image generation. The interesting part is that the workflow is changing too. Instead of asking AI 20 times to move a lighthouse or UI element into the right position, he had Claude build custom editors so he can tweak and save everything manually. Week 5 of seeing how far one person can push AI game development.

5 weeks ago, this fishing game didn’t exist. Now it has a full 3D world, dynamic water, day/night cycles, fishing mechanics, rarity systems, custom UI and even its own in-game editors. Almost everything is being built with AI. Claude handles most of the game, Claude + Blender MCP handles 3D work, and ChatGPT helps with image generation. The interesting part is that the workflow is changing too. Instead of asking AI 20 times to move a lighthouse or UI element into the right position, he had Claude build custom editors so he can tweak and save everything manually. Week 5 of seeing how far one person can push AI game development.

Hakimi Eiqbal

43,159 views • 1 month ago

THIS GUY TURNED A REAL PROPERTY SITE INTO A 3D SCENE IN ONE AFTERNOON AND CUT A $2,400/YEAR TOOL STACK DOWN TO ABOUT $2/MONTH he pulled a normal land plot into TouchDesigner, connected a local model through Ollama and built the whole visual loop from one laptop by evening the site was live, reconstructed as a 3D environment that looked like a studio render without cloud GPUs, paid APIs or another subscription sitting in the middle most creators are still stacking plugins, render credits and software fees just to make one demo look expensive he kept the process local, turned a real location into a cinematic 3D model, and made the setup cost basically nothing to keep running save this before everyone realizes the next “pro” 3D workflow is just a laptop, a local model and someone who knows how to connect the pieces

THIS GUY TURNED A REAL PROPERTY SITE INTO A 3D SCENE IN ONE AFTERNOON AND CUT A $2,400/YEAR TOOL STACK DOWN TO ABOUT $2/MONTH he pulled a normal land plot into TouchDesigner, connected a local model through Ollama and built the whole visual loop from one laptop by evening the site was live, reconstructed as a 3D environment that looked like a studio render without cloud GPUs, paid APIs or another subscription sitting in the middle most creators are still stacking plugins, render credits and software fees just to make one demo look expensive he kept the process local, turned a real location into a cinematic 3D model, and made the setup cost basically nothing to keep running save this before everyone realizes the next “pro” 3D workflow is just a laptop, a local model and someone who knows how to connect the pieces

Gipp 🦅

47,398 views • 4 months ago

$This is running in a browser tab. No engine. No install. No download. Six spells, real-time particle simulation, refracting ice geometry, and a live VFX editor on the right side where every parameter is tunable while the scene runs. A studio VFX artist builds this in weeks. It is genuinely the hardest discipline in 3D - nothing about particle work is intuitive. The thing that changed is not that AI got better at art. It is that Astra writes geometry and shaders as CODE instead of as files. A game made of .fbx files is a game an AI can only rearrange. A game made of code is a game an AI can edit. That is why the good demos this week are all three.js and Blender-scripted, and why they run at 60fps in a tab. Dude built a full game this way and it came out under 2 MB before audio. Every rock, tree and character - procedural code, not assets. The cost consequence is the part almost nobody understood: → let the model CLICK in Blender: burns your weekly cap in two minutes → let the model WRITE Blender Python: ~100x cheaper One builder shipped a complete 3D roguelike level - day/night cycle, weather, modeling, texturing, enemies - for 3% of his quota. That is the entire reason why. Scripts, not clicks. It's the single rule that decides your bill. Full breakdown + the 7-day guide in the article below ↓$

This is running in a browser tab. No engine. No install. No download. Six spells, real-time particle simulation, refracting ice geometry, and a live VFX editor on the right side where every parameter is tunable while the scene runs. A studio VFX artist builds this in weeks. It is genuinely the hardest discipline in 3D - nothing about particle work is intuitive. The thing that changed is not that AI got better at art. It is that Astra writes geometry and shaders as CODE instead of as files. A game made of .fbx files is a game an AI can only rearrange. A game made of code is a game an AI can edit. That is why the good demos this week are all three.js and Blender-scripted, and why they run at 60fps in a tab. Dude built a full game this way and it came out under 2 MB before audio. Every rock, tree and character - procedural code, not assets. The cost consequence is the part almost nobody understood: → let the model CLICK in Blender: burns your weekly cap in two minutes → let the model WRITE Blender Python: ~100x cheaper One builder shipped a complete 3D roguelike level - day/night cycle, weather, modeling, texturing, enemies - for 3% of his quota. That is the entire reason why. Scripts, not clicks. It's the single rule that decides your bill. Full breakdown + the 7-day guide in the article below ↓

Aleiah

41,744 views • 27 days ago

This guy replaced an $8,000 survey crew with one drone and a pipeline on Claude Code that digitizes a whole site in a single trip. Inside it is not one drone but a whole pipeline of 5 modules on Claude Code each with its own job all answering to a single orchestrator. And he built them himself with no team. He draws one line on the map from the controller and the whole site starts turning into data at once. Pilot flies the DJI Matrice 350 RTK along the route and reaches where a crew drags tripods: the parking lot and the roofs and the grading. Scanner on the Zenmuse L2 records the geometry with a laser down to the centimeter. Builder in DJI Terra stitches the point cloud into a digital twin. Analyst on Claude builds what the client needs out of the finished model: a volume report and a progress diff and a tour behind a link. Mobile lives in his iPhone and hands the developer a link to the model while he drives to the next site. The site is ready as a file in about an hour and the developer rotates it in the browser himself and measures distances. No crew. No tripods. No week on site. Just him and a pickup and a drone and one API key. The whole processing pipeline lives in a folder at /Users/dev/site-capture. But he did not stop at a one time scan. The pipeline raises him by voice only when a flight misses a patch or when a sag on site goes past tolerance. And this is not made up: the DJI Matrice 350 RTK and the Zenmuse L2 are off the shelf enterprise hardware. The specs are one search away and the L2 really does write around 240,000 points per second. A crew for the same job charges $8,000 and three trips plus a week of desk work. His cost is tokens and subscriptions: one battery charge per flight and around $300 a month to host the finished models. In the end he draws one line on the map and an operator that does not exist scans the site and calculates the volumes and builds the report while he never leaves his truck. There is a huge market of everyone who needs to measure construction sites and warehouses and roofs and parking lots over and over while they still send out a photographer with a camera and wait a week. And he built this whole pipeline himself: one drone and one scanner and Claude Code that turns a flight into a file the developer pays for.

This guy replaced an $8,000 survey crew with one drone and a pipeline on Claude Code that digitizes a whole site in a single trip. Inside it is not one drone but a whole pipeline of 5 modules on Claude Code each with its own job all answering to a single orchestrator. And he built them himself with no team. He draws one line on the map from the controller and the whole site starts turning into data at once. Pilot flies the DJI Matrice 350 RTK along the route and reaches where a crew drags tripods: the parking lot and the roofs and the grading. Scanner on the Zenmuse L2 records the geometry with a laser down to the centimeter. Builder in DJI Terra stitches the point cloud into a digital twin. Analyst on Claude builds what the client needs out of the finished model: a volume report and a progress diff and a tour behind a link. Mobile lives in his iPhone and hands the developer a link to the model while he drives to the next site. The site is ready as a file in about an hour and the developer rotates it in the browser himself and measures distances. No crew. No tripods. No week on site. Just him and a pickup and a drone and one API key. The whole processing pipeline lives in a folder at /Users/dev/site-capture. But he did not stop at a one time scan. The pipeline raises him by voice only when a flight misses a patch or when a sag on site goes past tolerance. And this is not made up: the DJI Matrice 350 RTK and the Zenmuse L2 are off the shelf enterprise hardware. The specs are one search away and the L2 really does write around 240,000 points per second. A crew for the same job charges $8,000 and three trips plus a week of desk work. His cost is tokens and subscriptions: one battery charge per flight and around $300 a month to host the finished models. In the end he draws one line on the map and an operator that does not exist scans the site and calculates the volumes and builds the report while he never leaves his truck. There is a huge market of everyone who needs to measure construction sites and warehouses and roofs and parking lots over and over while they still send out a photographer with a camera and wait a week. And he built this whole pipeline himself: one drone and one scanner and Claude Code that turns a flight into a file the developer pays for.

Blaze

10,772 views • 3 months ago

20-YEAR-OLD GUY SHOWS HOW CLAUDE API CAN TURN 500-VIEW CONTENT INTO A $40K/MONTH CLIENT WORKFLOW Not from a big agency. Not from hiring writers. Just taking the same service people sell every week and wiring Claude API into the boring middle. A topic goes in. It pulls the research, angles, outline, draft, edits, and a clean file. That is normally $500-$1,500 of freelance work per client project. The screen says around $40K/month, but the real number is the time saved. A $3K project stops being 8 hours of rewriting and becomes 45 minutes of checking before delivery. Most people use Claude to write one answer. He is showing what happens when the whole process becomes the product.

20-YEAR-OLD GUY SHOWS HOW CLAUDE API CAN TURN 500-VIEW CONTENT INTO A $40K/MONTH CLIENT WORKFLOW Not from a big agency. Not from hiring writers. Just taking the same service people sell every week and wiring Claude API into the boring middle. A topic goes in. It pulls the research, angles, outline, draft, edits, and a clean file. That is normally $500-$1,500 of freelance work per client project. The screen says around $40K/month, but the real number is the time saved. A $3K project stops being 8 hours of rewriting and becomes 45 minutes of checking before delivery. Most people use Claude to write one answer. He is showing what happens when the whole process becomes the product.

Gipp 🦅

19,254 views • 4 months ago

This FREE guide shows you how to build a full automated TikTok content machine with Claude Opus 4.7 one setup. 30 slideshows a week. $0 cost [ by the end you'll have ]: - a library of proven viral hooks - a Pinterest-to-slides pipeline that runs on autopilot - a full week of content scheduled in 2 hours - a system you can reuse every single week [ the workflow ]: > steal hooks from viral TikToks > pull images from Pinterest for free > generate slides with a script (no Canva) > Postiz schedules the drafts for a full week IDEA: you can sell it as a service for $200-300/mo for each creator setup this system one time and onboard 10+ clients (you can do it easily, since it's needed to any creator) most creators still do this manually.. this automates the entire pipeline save it. set it up this weekend

This FREE guide shows you how to build a full automated TikTok content machine with Claude Opus 4.7 one setup. 30 slideshows a week. $0 cost [ by the end you'll have ]: - a library of proven viral hooks - a Pinterest-to-slides pipeline that runs on autopilot - a full week of content scheduled in 2 hours - a system you can reuse every single week [ the workflow ]: > steal hooks from viral TikToks > pull images from Pinterest for free > generate slides with a script (no Canva) > Postiz schedules the drafts for a full week IDEA: you can sell it as a service for $200-300/mo for each creator setup this system one time and onboard 10+ clients (you can do it easily, since it's needed to any creator) most creators still do this manually.. this automates the entire pipeline save it. set it up this weekend

Ronin

102,935 views • 5 months ago

19 YEAR OLD IS RUNNING A YOUTUBE ANIMATION STUDIO FROM HIS BEDROOM. HE HAS NO ANIMATORS. HE CANNOT DRAW. HE IS PRINTING MONEY FROM CHILDREN'S RHYMES. Kids' YouTube channels routinely pull millions of views per video. The platform pays creators between $1,000 and $3,000 for every hundred thousand views in that niche. Before this year, getting a piece of that market required a 3D animation studio, voice actors, and a month of rendering. He does it in under three minutes. His entire studio is a GPT sol and a Claude window. He opens YouTube and finds the most popular nursery rhyme channels. He takes a screenshot of their video feed. He opens Claude. He has a custom tool called Higgsfield MCP connected directly to his chat. He pastes the screenshot. He writes one prompt. Analyze this YouTube channel and generate a week of original content in the exact same style and niche. He hits enter. A few minutes later, the chat window spits out a fully rendered, broadcast-ready 3D animation. A baby playing with blocks, perfectly lit, smoothly animated, and ready to be monetized. He uploads it to his channel. The next day, he does it again. The kids watching on their iPads don't know the video was generated by an AI analyzing a screenshot. The parents who just want five minutes of quiet don't care. The algorithm treats it like a Pixar short. A real animation studio spends $50,000 and two months to produce three minutes of content. He spends zero dollars, takes a screenshot, and goes to make coffee. While the rest of the internet argues about whether AI is a real job, a quiet group of teenagers is pulling market share from massive media companies with a single prompt. Most people will watch his tutorial and complain. A few will open a new tab.

19 YEAR OLD IS RUNNING A YOUTUBE ANIMATION STUDIO FROM HIS BEDROOM. HE HAS NO ANIMATORS. HE CANNOT DRAW. HE IS PRINTING MONEY FROM CHILDREN'S RHYMES. Kids' YouTube channels routinely pull millions of views per video. The platform pays creators between $1,000 and $3,000 for every hundred thousand views in that niche. Before this year, getting a piece of that market required a 3D animation studio, voice actors, and a month of rendering. He does it in under three minutes. His entire studio is a GPT sol and a Claude window. He opens YouTube and finds the most popular nursery rhyme channels. He takes a screenshot of their video feed. He opens Claude. He has a custom tool called Higgsfield MCP connected directly to his chat. He pastes the screenshot. He writes one prompt. Analyze this YouTube channel and generate a week of original content in the exact same style and niche. He hits enter. A few minutes later, the chat window spits out a fully rendered, broadcast-ready 3D animation. A baby playing with blocks, perfectly lit, smoothly animated, and ready to be monetized. He uploads it to his channel. The next day, he does it again. The kids watching on their iPads don't know the video was generated by an AI analyzing a screenshot. The parents who just want five minutes of quiet don't care. The algorithm treats it like a Pixar short. A real animation studio spends $50,000 and two months to produce three minutes of content. He spends zero dollars, takes a screenshot, and goes to make coffee. While the rest of the internet argues about whether AI is a real job, a quiet group of teenagers is pulling market share from massive media companies with a single prompt. Most people will watch his tutorial and complain. A few will open a new tab.

ZER

31,034 views • 2 months ago

🔥 img2threejs × GPT-6 Astra × Hyper3D Live showcase: This is probably one of the most commercially valuable workflows I’ve tested so far. Image → Hyper3D → img2threejs → GPT-6 Astra → Interactive Three.js experience. 1/ Hyper3D handles the 3D reconstruction. 2/ img2threejs turns that result into a structured workflow that an AI coding model can actually work with. 3/ And GPT-6 Astra follows the img2threejs pipeline - turning the reconstructed asset into a structured, editable, and interactive Three.js experience with animation, VFX, lighting, and application logic. The important part isn’t just generating a 3D model, It’s what happens after the model exists. Instead of ending with a static asset, you can continue building around it with code: → Games → Interactive product experiences → 3D websites → Character showcases → Virtual worlds → Rapid prototypes 3D generation becomes the beginning of the workflow - not the final output. And when you combine high-quality reconstruction with an AI model capable of understanding and building the surrounding experience, the path from image → 3D → usable product becomes dramatically shorter. This is exactly the direction I want to push img2threejs. More experiments with OpenAI GPT-6 Astra × Hyper3D by Deemos are coming this month. 👨‍🍳

🔥 img2threejs × GPT-6 Astra × Hyper3D Live showcase: This is probably one of the most commercially valuable workflows I’ve tested so far. Image → Hyper3D → img2threejs → GPT-6 Astra → Interactive Three.js experience. 1/ Hyper3D handles the 3D reconstruction. 2/ img2threejs turns that result into a structured workflow that an AI coding model can actually work with. 3/ And GPT-6 Astra follows the img2threejs pipeline - turning the reconstructed asset into a structured, editable, and interactive Three.js experience with animation, VFX, lighting, and application logic. The important part isn’t just generating a 3D model, It’s what happens after the model exists. Instead of ending with a static asset, you can continue building around it with code: → Games → Interactive product experiences → 3D websites → Character showcases → Virtual worlds → Rapid prototypes 3D generation becomes the beginning of the workflow - not the final output. And when you combine high-quality reconstruction with an AI model capable of understanding and building the surrounding experience, the path from image → 3D → usable product becomes dramatically shorter. This is exactly the direction I want to push img2threejs. More experiments with OpenAI GPT-6 Astra × Hyper3D by Deemos are coming this month. 👨‍🍳

Nick

12,239 views • 26 days ago

Someone on Reddit just built a AAA-quality snow simulation in their browser. Using Claude Opus 5. Millions of snow particles. A character in a robe with cloth physics. Five water-based spells that carve the terrain. A snow surfing system with a wake that throws spray into sunlight. Every footstep displaces snow. Trails form berms at the edges. Trenches slowly refill over time. Spells leave permanent craters. The entire thing runs in one browser tab. WebGPU. No game engine. No 3D modeling software. Just code. He wrote one detailed prompt. Opus 5 planned the architecture, wrote the shaders, built the physics, iterated from screenshots, and documented every decision. 9 hours. ~4 million tokens. You can open it right now and walk around in it. This isn't a demo. This is the kind of thing a small studio would spend months building.

Someone on Reddit just built a AAA-quality snow simulation in their browser. Using Claude Opus 5. Millions of snow particles. A character in a robe with cloth physics. Five water-based spells that carve the terrain. A snow surfing system with a wake that throws spray into sunlight. Every footstep displaces snow. Trails form berms at the edges. Trenches slowly refill over time. Spells leave permanent craters. The entire thing runs in one browser tab. WebGPU. No game engine. No 3D modeling software. Just code. He wrote one detailed prompt. Opus 5 planned the architecture, wrote the shaders, built the physics, iterated from screenshots, and documented every decision. 9 hours. ~4 million tokens. You can open it right now and walk around in it. This isn't a demo. This is the kind of thing a small studio would spend months building.

Vaibhav Sisinty

1,220,146 views • 2 months ago

A 36-year-old girl from Detroit who has 3 kids asked Claude how to make money if you don't have time to do anything? He gave an answer and her monthly income amounted to $15,459 Claude + Shopify = automated dropshipping All her investment is a $20 Claude subscription Claude comes up with a niche for products by analyzing popular trends, creates clickable descriptions, generates photos and videos that stand out from the rest A person pays for the order -> Claude buys on Aliexpress 60-70% cheaper -> the package goes to the buyer In essence, this is a store managed by a manager instead of you, you just get the profit Earnings: Week 1 > $1,465 Week 2 > $2,657 Week 3 > $7,842 1 month > $15,459 The full instruction is already publicly available

A 36-year-old girl from Detroit who has 3 kids asked Claude how to make money if you don't have time to do anything? He gave an answer and her monthly income amounted to $15,459 Claude + Shopify = automated dropshipping All her investment is a $20 Claude subscription Claude comes up with a niche for products by analyzing popular trends, creates clickable descriptions, generates photos and videos that stand out from the rest A person pays for the order -> Claude buys on Aliexpress 60-70% cheaper -> the package goes to the buyer In essence, this is a store managed by a manager instead of you, you just get the profit Earnings: Week 1 > $1,465 Week 2 > $2,657 Week 3 > $7,842 1 month > $15,459 The full instruction is already publicly available

Bober_smart

385,996 views • 4 months ago

Blender tutorials are about to age very badly. In this demo, Kimi K3 gets two character references and a plain-English request. Minutes later, it builds the first version inside Blender. The user asks for a better horn, Kimi edits the same scene, and the character starts moving. This is not another AI tool generating one lucky image. It is working with an actual editable 3D project, then changing the geometry after feedback instead of restarting from zero. It still needs human direction, because the first result is rarely the good one. But blockouts, repetitive edits, Blender Python, and basic iteration are becoming a conversation rather than hours of clicking through menus. Kimi K3 + Blender MCP is basically turning 3D modeling into: describe it, inspect it, complain about it, and let the AI fix it.

Blender tutorials are about to age very badly. In this demo, Kimi K3 gets two character references and a plain-English request. Minutes later, it builds the first version inside Blender. The user asks for a better horn, Kimi edits the same scene, and the character starts moving. This is not another AI tool generating one lucky image. It is working with an actual editable 3D project, then changing the geometry after feedback instead of restarting from zero. It still needs human direction, because the first result is rarely the good one. But blockouts, repetitive edits, Blender Python, and basic iteration are becoming a conversation rather than hours of clicking through menus. Kimi K3 + Blender MCP is basically turning 3D modeling into: describe it, inspect it, complain about it, and let the AI fix it.

Rina

19,092 views • 2 months ago

A 16-year-old American student made $7,000 in his first month after publishing his first game on Google Play - and GPT-5.5 built the whole thing for him. He had zero programming knowledge and no $50,000 dev team. He just opened GPT-5.5, described what he wanted to build, and went to play while the AI wrote every line of code for him. GPT-5.5 built a complete 3D game called Hormuz Escape from scratch - obstacle avoidance mechanics, high score system, particle effects, AdMob integration for ads, and a Firebase leaderboard. All from one prompt in a week of work. A Google Play Developer account cost $25 once and forever. 10,000 active players at $0.03 a day through AdMob is already $9,000 a month in passive income. He stopped at $7,000 in the first month and the number keeps growing. 3 billion Android devices in the world and the Play Store is open to anyone with $25 and an idea. AI removed the last barrier - needing to know how to code. $25 to register, One week of work. $7,000 in the first month.

A 16-year-old American student made $7,000 in his first month after publishing his first game on Google Play - and GPT-5.5 built the whole thing for him. He had zero programming knowledge and no $50,000 dev team. He just opened GPT-5.5, described what he wanted to build, and went to play while the AI wrote every line of code for him. GPT-5.5 built a complete 3D game called Hormuz Escape from scratch - obstacle avoidance mechanics, high score system, particle effects, AdMob integration for ads, and a Firebase leaderboard. All from one prompt in a week of work. A Google Play Developer account cost $25 once and forever. 10,000 active players at $0.03 a day through AdMob is already $9,000 a month in passive income. He stopped at $7,000 in the first month and the number keeps growing. 3 billion Android devices in the world and the Play Store is open to anyone with $25 and an idea. AI removed the last barrier - needing to know how to code. $25 to register, One week of work. $7,000 in the first month.

Sprytix

86,291 views • 5 months ago

fal's Gorkem Yurtseven on the Blender, Astra, and H3 Max workflow professionals are using to get exactly the shot they wanted: "Using Blender with one of these AI models together is an extremely popular workflow for professional work." "You render a low resolution of your scene, what you want to do, using Blender, previous non-AI technology. And once you add that video as a reference to an AI model, you basically get close to 100% controllability." "This is an incredibly popular workflow for VFX artists, people who are doing this professionally, because they want to get exactly what they put into the model." "A week after we launched H3 Max, people started generating these beautiful scenes using an LLM, Astra, in Blender, and all of a sudden it unlocked a whole new pipeline. Using an LLM to create a Blender scene and then passing that to the H3 Max model." "It works very well with H3 Max because it's extremely fast and you can try many things all at once in parallel." Gorkem Yurtseven batuhan the fal guy fal Jennifer Li

fal's Gorkem Yurtseven on the Blender, Astra, and H3 Max workflow professionals are using to get exactly the shot they wanted: "Using Blender with one of these AI models together is an extremely popular workflow for professional work." "You render a low resolution of your scene, what you want to do, using Blender, previous non-AI technology. And once you add that video as a reference to an AI model, you basically get close to 100% controllability." "This is an incredibly popular workflow for VFX artists, people who are doing this professionally, because they want to get exactly what they put into the model." "A week after we launched H3 Max, people started generating these beautiful scenes using an LLM, Astra, in Blender, and all of a sudden it unlocked a whole new pipeline. Using an LLM to create a Blender scene and then passing that to the H3 Max model." "It works very well with H3 Max because it's extremely fast and you can try many things all at once in parallel." Gorkem Yurtseven batuhan the fal guy fal Jennifer Li

a16z

34,883 views • 16 days ago

Motion graphics used to take me an hour per scene (or more) Now I'm creating them in 3-5 minutes — without After Effects, without Premiere, without writing a single line of code. I'm a former LA filmmaker (still PGA). My entire video stack is now 3 tools: Claude Code + HyperFrames (from HeyGen) + Descript Here's how the workflow runs: 1. Drop my brand style guide into a folder (colors, fonts, components Claude reuses forever) 2. Paste a line from my Descript transcript into Claude Code: "Create a scene for this part of the video" 3. Claude Code reads my brand, generates the HyperFrames scene, renders it to MP4 4. Drag the MP4 into Descript, drop it on the matching line of the transcript 5. Done. 3-5 minutes per scene. The unlock is the brand style guide. Once Claude has your colors, fonts, and reusable components, every scene inherits your look automatically. Bonus — you can take a Claude Design export (.zip), hand it to Claude Code, and it'll convert the HTML into a HyperFrames video you can render and edit. I built a GitHub repo with all the skills pre-loaded. Non-developers can clone it, open Claude Code, and be rendering scenes in under 10 minutes. Full walkthrough (20 min video) below Repo (skills + brand template + music-from-transcript plugin): Bookmark this if you make videos. The brand-style-guide pattern alone will save you hours every week. If you're a creator or operator using AI for content — share this with someone who's still living in After Effects.

JJ Englert

103,601 views • 5 months ago

ANTHROPIC LEAKED THE 6 REPOS THEY BUILT CLAUDE CODE ON - THEY REPLACE A $120K/MONTH TEAM AND COST $3 A DAY anyone can clone 6 repos - almost nobody assembles them into a team that runs for $3 a day. core → skills → patterns → gates → self-patch 4 executors on the core are the largest line on the bill - $1.10 a day, and that's where you get 4 PRs instead of one. move that layer to the priciest model and the bill doubles with almost nothing to show for it. 7 procedures sit on disk, exactly 1 enters the window - a convention pasted into a prompt is rent, a convention in a folder is storage. the most expensive model sits on exactly 2 layers out of 6 - it plans and it judges, and that's the second-smallest line on the bill. the template arrives with 4 problems already solved: auth, payments, deploy, errors - the ones you'd rediscover yourself in week three. at the gates the cheap model triages 80 findings and the expensive one reads 4 - which is why it costs 60 cents, not 6 dollars. security scans every commit for 20 cents a day - the cheapest line on the stack and the first one everyone cuts. and the key part: the gate doesn't just reject, it writes the missing rule into the procedures - next week the team works to rules it wrote itself. the wrong model on the wrong layer costs 5x overpaid or a month of rework - and that's the part nobody publishes. save this and paste it into Claude Code - the repos are public, the assembly isn't ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED THE 6 REPOS THEY BUILT CLAUDE CODE ON - THEY REPLACE A $120K/MONTH TEAM AND COST $3 A DAY anyone can clone 6 repos - almost nobody assembles them into a team that runs for $3 a day. core → skills → patterns → gates → self-patch 4 executors on the core are the largest line on the bill - $1.10 a day, and that's where you get 4 PRs instead of one. move that layer to the priciest model and the bill doubles with almost nothing to show for it. 7 procedures sit on disk, exactly 1 enters the window - a convention pasted into a prompt is rent, a convention in a folder is storage. the most expensive model sits on exactly 2 layers out of 6 - it plans and it judges, and that's the second-smallest line on the bill. the template arrives with 4 problems already solved: auth, payments, deploy, errors - the ones you'd rediscover yourself in week three. at the gates the cheap model triages 80 findings and the expensive one reads 4 - which is why it costs 60 cents, not 6 dollars. security scans every commit for 20 cents a day - the cheapest line on the stack and the first one everyone cuts. and the key part: the gate doesn't just reject, it writes the missing rule into the procedures - next week the team works to rules it wrote itself. the wrong model on the wrong layer costs 5x overpaid or a month of rework - and that's the part nobody publishes. save this and paste it into Claude Code - the repos are public, the assembly isn't ↓

Sprytix

18,110 views • 1 month ago