Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇨🇳🇯🇵 A declining, geopolitically sidelined former fascist empire will always lash out at a stronger neighbor, not because it matters, but because it cannot accept its own irrelevance. Sanae Takaichi and her fascist supporters keep performing this ritual aggression as if shouting at China might convince the world, or... themselves, that Tokyo is still a central player in Asian affairs. It’s the same psychological withdrawal syndrome Britain shows over Hong Kong: “Look at me. I used to rule you. I was important once.” Clinging to colonial memories has become their last refuge from contemporary decline. But China doesn’t do imperial nostalgia or geopolitical PUA. China acknowledges history, learns from it, and refuses to let the tragedies of the 20th century repeat themselves. Fascist Japan, however, will never again be given the opportunity to test that history.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

49,189 subscribers

26,517 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

🇨🇳🇯🇵🇵🇭 China didn’t "send a message," it delivered a verdict. “The atrocities must be remembered. The blood debts must be repaid. The justice must be delivered for crimes.” This is no longer the anger of civilians, it is the cold, institutional memory of a nation that buried 35 million of its people under fascist steel. The Pacific War never truly ended. How could it? Fascist Japan never truly confessed. And every attempt to revive militarism isn’t a threat to China, it is Japan digging up the corpse of its own past. As for the Philippines: When a nation that was slaughtered, starved, and enslaved now bows to the descendants of the same fascist empire… that’s not “moving on.” That’s colonial trauma wearing a fresh flag. They say China’s diplomacy is “getting sharper.” No, China is simply done pretending that history is a metaphor, it is an invoice, and overdue debts get collected. Fascism is not “returning” to Asia. It never left Japan, and China is reminding the region why it will never rise again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

76,662 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,439 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

September 18. Every year, warning bells ring across multiple cities in China. Not because China is “using history.” Because history happened. Descendants of Japanese fascists love to accuse China of “weaponizing the past” whenever China refuses to forget Japan’s invasion, occupation and massacres. But there is a fundamental difference between the perpetrator’s discomfort and the victim’s memory. For China, September 18 is not diplomatic theater. It is a national scar. A reminder of what happened. How it happened. How quickly invasion became occupation. How fascism, once normalized, turned into years of slaughter. And why China will never allow Japan the opportunity to pick up that knife again. The aggressor always wants history to expire. The victim remembers because survival depends on remembering. One side calls it “dwelling on the past.” The other calls it memory. A fascist state masquerading as peaceful in the post-war era, frenetically rewriting wartime atrocities and aggressively expanding its militaristic arsenal. And history does not belong to the aggressor to rewrite. Alarm bells are warning the world: history must not be forgotten — and above all, it must not be allowed to repeat itself.

September 18. Every year, warning bells ring across multiple cities in China. Not because China is “using history.” Because history happened. Descendants of Japanese fascists love to accuse China of “weaponizing the past” whenever China refuses to forget Japan’s invasion, occupation and massacres. But there is a fundamental difference between the perpetrator’s discomfort and the victim’s memory. For China, September 18 is not diplomatic theater. It is a national scar. A reminder of what happened. How it happened. How quickly invasion became occupation. How fascism, once normalized, turned into years of slaughter. And why China will never allow Japan the opportunity to pick up that knife again. The aggressor always wants history to expire. The victim remembers because survival depends on remembering. One side calls it “dwelling on the past.” The other calls it memory. A fascist state masquerading as peaceful in the post-war era, frenetically rewriting wartime atrocities and aggressively expanding its militaristic arsenal. And history does not belong to the aggressor to rewrite. Alarm bells are warning the world: history must not be forgotten — and above all, it must not be allowed to repeat itself.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

15,983 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

🇯🇵 Why Japan’s Decline Is Psychological, Not Just Economic Everyone talks about Japan’s economic stagnation — lost decades, shrinking influence, declining industries. But there’s a deeper layer almost nobody touches: Japan’s geopolitical identity crisis is inseparable from its hostility toward China. Not because China threatens Japan. But because China shattered the psychological structure Japan has lived inside for 80 years. 1. Japan once believed it understood how Asia should work. Modern Japan’s national mindset is built on one story: • The U.S. defeated us. • The U.S. rebuilt us. • The U.S. protects us. • The West accepts us as the “civilized Asian,” the honorary white nation. Japan internalized this hierarchy. And then it projected the same logic onto China. Japan slaughtered 35 million Chinese. Ran Unit 731. Used women as sexual slaves. But Tokyo always believed: “I am richer, I am more advanced, I have better reputation. So China should ‘move on’ the same way I moved on under U.S. rule.” Japan thought dominance creates obedience. Because that is how it behaved toward America. 2. When China was weak, Japan mistook silence for acceptance. For decades, China didn’t have the power to push back internationally. Japan interpreted this as: • “China accepted our narrative.” • “China doesn’t dare confront us.” • “The war is over — we won the moral argument.” This is absolutely not reconciliation; it is merely a power illusion. Japan became comfortable believing: “If China must bow to someone, it should bow to me, just like I bowed to America.” 3. Then China rose — and Japan’s entire worldview collapsed. China didn’t just grow. China overtook Japan in every pillar of national power: • GDP • Manufacturing • Technology • Diplomacy • Military • Global influence China now competes with the United States itself — the very empire Japan historically imitates. And this is where the psychological rupture begins: Japan cannot emotionally process a world where China stands on the same level as America. Because in Japan’s internal hierarchy: • America is the master. • Japan is the apprentice. • China is supposed to be below both. But suddenly… the “student of America” watches the “victim of Japan” surpass them both in power and prestige. For many Japanese nationalists, this feels like an existential insult: “How dare China rise to the level of my master? How dare China erase the hierarchy that defines me?” So the hatred intensifies. Not just political hatred — existential hatred. 4. And the irony? China never asked Japan to kneel. China only asked Japan to face history. But to Japan, acknowledging history means acknowledging loss of superiority. So instead, resentment grows. And Japan’s geopolitical relevance shrinks even faster. 5. Japan’s economic decline is inseparable from this psychological stagnation. - While China built entire industrial ecosystems, Japan clung to nostalgia and Western validation. - While China out-innovated, out-built, out-scaled, Japan obsessed over keeping China “in its place.” Japan’s decline is not just economic, it is a refusal to accept a world where it no longer defines Asia.

🇯🇵 Why Japan’s Decline Is Psychological, Not Just Economic Everyone talks about Japan’s economic stagnation — lost decades, shrinking influence, declining industries. But there’s a deeper layer almost nobody touches: Japan’s geopolitical identity crisis is inseparable from its hostility toward China. Not because China threatens Japan. But because China shattered the psychological structure Japan has lived inside for 80 years. 1. Japan once believed it understood how Asia should work. Modern Japan’s national mindset is built on one story: • The U.S. defeated us. • The U.S. rebuilt us. • The U.S. protects us. • The West accepts us as the “civilized Asian,” the honorary white nation. Japan internalized this hierarchy. And then it projected the same logic onto China. Japan slaughtered 35 million Chinese. Ran Unit 731. Used women as sexual slaves. But Tokyo always believed: “I am richer, I am more advanced, I have better reputation. So China should ‘move on’ the same way I moved on under U.S. rule.” Japan thought dominance creates obedience. Because that is how it behaved toward America. 2. When China was weak, Japan mistook silence for acceptance. For decades, China didn’t have the power to push back internationally. Japan interpreted this as: • “China accepted our narrative.” • “China doesn’t dare confront us.” • “The war is over — we won the moral argument.” This is absolutely not reconciliation; it is merely a power illusion. Japan became comfortable believing: “If China must bow to someone, it should bow to me, just like I bowed to America.” 3. Then China rose — and Japan’s entire worldview collapsed. China didn’t just grow. China overtook Japan in every pillar of national power: • GDP • Manufacturing • Technology • Diplomacy • Military • Global influence China now competes with the United States itself — the very empire Japan historically imitates. And this is where the psychological rupture begins: Japan cannot emotionally process a world where China stands on the same level as America. Because in Japan’s internal hierarchy: • America is the master. • Japan is the apprentice. • China is supposed to be below both. But suddenly… the “student of America” watches the “victim of Japan” surpass them both in power and prestige. For many Japanese nationalists, this feels like an existential insult: “How dare China rise to the level of my master? How dare China erase the hierarchy that defines me?” So the hatred intensifies. Not just political hatred — existential hatred. 4. And the irony? China never asked Japan to kneel. China only asked Japan to face history. But to Japan, acknowledging history means acknowledging loss of superiority. So instead, resentment grows. And Japan’s geopolitical relevance shrinks even faster. 5. Japan’s economic decline is inseparable from this psychological stagnation. - While China built entire industrial ecosystems, Japan clung to nostalgia and Western validation. - While China out-innovated, out-built, out-scaled, Japan obsessed over keeping China “in its place.” Japan’s decline is not just economic, it is a refusal to accept a world where it no longer defines Asia.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

179,313 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.

For five thousand years, China has understood one simple truth: history is not a toy. It cannot be bent for politics, edited for convenience, or erased for someone else’s narrative. That’s why, the moment Trump launched “Trade War 2.0” in his second term and began spreading blatant lies about COVID-19, China stopped giving him diplomatic courtesy. A civilization that survived dynasties, invasions, famine, plague, and rebirth does not need to tolerate the delusions of a man who thinks history begins with his tweets. China remembers 2020 clearly. China documented every case, every death, every hospital bed that overflowed. And years from now, when people look back at the pandemic, they will find something striking: China kept the most complete records. Others kept the most convenient ones. This is exactly why Beijing refuses to let Trump rewrite the past, refuses to let Western media manufacture “alternative timelines,” and refuses to let Japan whitewash its history of aggression. A nation that writes its own history — in its own hand, word by word — does not outsource truth. So when the Foreign Ministry calls out lies today, it isn’t just diplomacy. It is civilizational self-defense. It is the insistence that memory cannot be colonized. China will not allow slander to replace fact. China will not allow forgetting to replace evidence. China will not allow those who failed their own people to lecture the world about pandemics. A civilization that knows its past refuses to let others falsify it.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

26,200 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

China warned Japan: if it pushes to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles and introduces allied nuclear weapons, it will undermine the post-war international order, violate its commitment to peace, and ultimately pay a heavy price. Japan’s obsession with nuclear weapons is almost poetic. The only country ever hit by nuclear bombs now wants to crawl under the nuclear umbrella of the country that bombed it — while pretending this is “security.” But no. Nuclear weapons will not make Japan safe. A defeated fascist state with an uncleared blood debt to Asia does not get to revive militarism, flirt with nuclear weapons, and pretend history is just a museum exhibit. China keeps reminding Japan of one fact: Japan is a defeated state of World War II. It is bound by the post-war order. It does not get to rewrite the rules because its neo-fascists wants to cosplay militaristic fantasies again. Fascist Japan’s debt to Asia was never paid. Not by anime. Not by cherry blossoms. Not by Western propaganda turning it into a cute, obedient Asian model student. Not by its practiced humility hiding a knife underneath. Not by kneeling at the feet of the same country that nuked it. Japan can decorate itself however it wants. China remembers what it is. And China will not allow history to repeat itself.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,604 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

Lord Bebo

100,407 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

Beijing rejects the West’s new “tribute system” lie. China stood at the height of world civilization for most of its long history. Yet it did not bomb half the world like the United States, a country with only 250 years of history and only 17 years without war. It did not colonize the entire Earth like the British Empire. China became the center of an Asian civilizational order — not a global machine of plunder. That is what the West still cannot understand. They look at China through their own jungle logic: If you are strong, you must dominate. If you rise, you must conquer. If others trade with you, they must be your “tribute system.” But no. Chinese civilization has always despised bullying the weak, worshiping power, and kneeling to foreigners. That is why Chinese people instinctively look down on self-colonized traitors, reverse nationalists, and postwar Japan — people who sold their spine and called the leash civilization. China’s moral line is very clear: What is ours, we will not give up an inch. What is not ours, we do not covet. That is why China defeated India and Vietnam, but did not occupy an extra inch beyond its own claims. Unlike Israel. Unlike Japan. Unlike America. Ask ordinary Chinese people whether China should invade another country, and 99% would reject it. Ask them whether China should defend itself from humiliation, invasion, and national collapse again, and 100% would rather pay the price. The West cannot imagine a powerful China that does not behave like the West. They look at China and see themselves. They fail to understand that China is a civilization masquerading as a nation. A civilization does not need to conquer or tame others. It commands its own gravity.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

19,670 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.

China has been relatively restrained toward the Philippines because Manila is still an ASEAN member. But this is changing. The Philippines is no longer just making noise in the South China Sea. It is trying to manufacture territorial claims over Chinese waters, coordinate with external powers, and even work with Japan — a defeated fascist state that once slaughtered Asians and burned half the region — to pressure China over territory that does not belong to them. That crosses a line. The key phrase in this Chinese report is not just “illegal claims.” It is this: undermining the post-WWII international order. That is the real signal. China is no longer treating the Philippines as a small neighbor being manipulated by Washington. It is beginning to treat Manila as part of the same fascist militarism chain as Japan: using colonial-era arrangements, foreign backing, and legal theater to challenge the territorial order created after Japan’s defeat. The Philippines was shaped by Spanish and American colonial rule. Its boundaries were defined by treaties. None of those treaties gave it Huangyan Dao. None of them gave it China’s Nansha Islands. Proximity is not sovereignty. If proximity decided ownership, the world map would collapse overnight. So when Manila claims Chinese islands because they are “closer,” it is not defending international law. It is trying to rewrite it. And when it does so alongside Japan, the symbolism becomes even uglier: a former colony and a former fascist aggressor trying to divide the waters of a WWII victor. China’s patience is not weakness. Reports like this are not just academic documents. They are legal groundwork. And once Beijing starts framing your actions as a threat to the postwar international order, you are no longer just playing a media game. You are being placed in the same historical category as the countries that tried to overturn Asia by force. China is putting the Philippines in Fascist Japan’s historical shadow.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,095 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇨🇳🇯🇵 Westerners keep asking: “Why are Chinese people so obsessed with every piece of their territory?” Let me answer this in a way they might finally understand. Because for China, land was never a trophy. It was never something you took when you were strong and gave up when you were tired. For thousands of years, our land was an inheritance. not from governments, but from ancestors. From farmers, from villages, from dynasties that rose, collapsed, and rebuilt themselves from ash. Every generation guarded the soil handed down by the last. Not because of nationalism, but because this is how a 5,000-year-old civilization stays alive. Meanwhile in the West, especially in settler states, land is just… negotiable. Stolen yesterday, abandoned tomorrow. I once heard an American say: “If California left, who cares? You can take it.” Of course he thinks that. His country is built on land taken by force, not land remembered through ancestors. You cannot lose what you never loved. China is different. We don’t guard territory because of politics. We guard it because we survived a century where others carved us apart, piece by piece, while calling it ‘civilization’ and ‘law’. We learned the lesson with blood: A nation that allows one inch to be taken, will eventually lose the right to stand. And here is the part Western moralists love to ignore: They cry for Palestine, claiming stolen land must be returned. But when China says Taiwan’s story is the same, suddenly “history doesn’t matter”. When Japan claims amnesia, they applaud. When China remembers, they panic. Why? Because a Japan that forgets is useful. A China that remembers is uncontrollable. And China today is—finally—at the stage where no one gets to tell us which parts of our history we are allowed to keep. This is not “aggression,” it is a civilization refusing to let its wounds be rewritten by former empires. So if you really want to understand why Taiwan is not negotiable, start here: For China, territory is memory. And memory is something we no longer allow others to steal.

🇨🇳🇯🇵 Westerners keep asking: “Why are Chinese people so obsessed with every piece of their territory?” Let me answer this in a way they might finally understand. Because for China, land was never a trophy. It was never something you took when you were strong and gave up when you were tired. For thousands of years, our land was an inheritance. not from governments, but from ancestors. From farmers, from villages, from dynasties that rose, collapsed, and rebuilt themselves from ash. Every generation guarded the soil handed down by the last. Not because of nationalism, but because this is how a 5,000-year-old civilization stays alive. Meanwhile in the West, especially in settler states, land is just… negotiable. Stolen yesterday, abandoned tomorrow. I once heard an American say: “If California left, who cares? You can take it.” Of course he thinks that. His country is built on land taken by force, not land remembered through ancestors. You cannot lose what you never loved. China is different. We don’t guard territory because of politics. We guard it because we survived a century where others carved us apart, piece by piece, while calling it ‘civilization’ and ‘law’. We learned the lesson with blood: A nation that allows one inch to be taken, will eventually lose the right to stand. And here is the part Western moralists love to ignore: They cry for Palestine, claiming stolen land must be returned. But when China says Taiwan’s story is the same, suddenly “history doesn’t matter”. When Japan claims amnesia, they applaud. When China remembers, they panic. Why? Because a Japan that forgets is useful. A China that remembers is uncontrollable. And China today is—finally—at the stage where no one gets to tell us which parts of our history we are allowed to keep. This is not “aggression,” it is a civilization refusing to let its wounds be rewritten by former empires. So if you really want to understand why Taiwan is not negotiable, start here: For China, territory is memory. And memory is something we no longer allow others to steal.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

548,041 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Elon Musk’s point about China is worth thinking about not because “China is peaceful,” but because China’s historical experience is fundamentally different from the Western imperial model we often use to interpret it. For much of its long history, China’s biggest wars were fought within China, not across oceans to build overseas colonies. Think about the scale of its history, the Three Kingdoms, the An Lushan Rebellion, the Mongol conquest, the Ming–Qing transition, the Taiping Rebellion, and countless periods of fragmentation and reunification. Some of these conflicts produced demographic catastrophes on a scale that is difficult to comprehend today. Elon frequently cited “70%” figure is debatable and shouldn’t be treated as a precise historical statistic. But the broader pattern is real, some of China’s bloodiest chapters were civil wars, rebellions and struggles over the reunification of the Chinese heartland. That matters because history shapes strategic culture. China is a continental civilisation with thousands of years of written history, repeatedly experiencing fragmentation, famine, invasion, reconstruction and reunification. Its strategic instinct has often been about maintaining internal cohesion, securing its borders and building economic strength. This doesn’t mean China has never expanded, fought neighbours or exercised imperial power, it absolutely has. And history is not destiny… But I think the mistake is assuming that China’s rise automatically follows the same trajectory as 19th-century European imperialism, overseas colonies, resource extraction and permanent expeditionary warfare. Look at what China has poured enormous resources into over the past few decades: high-speed rail, ports, manufacturing, cities, energy infrastructure, technology and industrial capacity. That tells us something, the question isn’t whether China is “good” or “bad”, the more useful question is what kind of superpower is China becoming? If we want to compete with China, collaborate with China, invest in China or simply understand China, we need to stop projecting our own historical experience onto it. You cannot understand a civilization with 5,000 years of history by viewing it through a 200-year-old Western lens.

Elon Musk’s point about China is worth thinking about not because “China is peaceful,” but because China’s historical experience is fundamentally different from the Western imperial model we often use to interpret it. For much of its long history, China’s biggest wars were fought within China, not across oceans to build overseas colonies. Think about the scale of its history, the Three Kingdoms, the An Lushan Rebellion, the Mongol conquest, the Ming–Qing transition, the Taiping Rebellion, and countless periods of fragmentation and reunification. Some of these conflicts produced demographic catastrophes on a scale that is difficult to comprehend today. Elon frequently cited “70%” figure is debatable and shouldn’t be treated as a precise historical statistic. But the broader pattern is real, some of China’s bloodiest chapters were civil wars, rebellions and struggles over the reunification of the Chinese heartland. That matters because history shapes strategic culture. China is a continental civilisation with thousands of years of written history, repeatedly experiencing fragmentation, famine, invasion, reconstruction and reunification. Its strategic instinct has often been about maintaining internal cohesion, securing its borders and building economic strength. This doesn’t mean China has never expanded, fought neighbours or exercised imperial power, it absolutely has. And history is not destiny… But I think the mistake is assuming that China’s rise automatically follows the same trajectory as 19th-century European imperialism, overseas colonies, resource extraction and permanent expeditionary warfare. Look at what China has poured enormous resources into over the past few decades: high-speed rail, ports, manufacturing, cities, energy infrastructure, technology and industrial capacity. That tells us something, the question isn’t whether China is “good” or “bad”, the more useful question is what kind of superpower is China becoming? If we want to compete with China, collaborate with China, invest in China or simply understand China, we need to stop projecting our own historical experience onto it. You cannot understand a civilization with 5,000 years of history by viewing it through a 200-year-old Western lens.

Alvin Foo

325,653 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

Japan is truly disgusting. It hides behind “postwar peace.” It hides behind “national security concerns.” It hides behind Washington’s leash, pretending that being America’s loyal attack dog against China somehow makes it an “Asian model student” worthy of Western comfort. But none of that erases what Japan did to Asia. Invasion. Massacres. Colonial rule. Rape. Forced sexual slavery. Human experimentation. Biological warfare. The slaughter and humiliation of Asian peoples. And even today, Japan still has the audacity to posture as a victim, while racism against other Asians, rape of minors in Asian countries, and sex tourism remain part of the ugly underside of its so-called “civilized” image. So when China asks Japan when it will sincerely apologize to Asian WWII victims, this is not “provocation.” It is history returning to the room. This time, China did not send emotional slogans. It sent sharp technocrats. From history, morality, international law, and the postwar order, they dismantled the entire Western-made beautification framework around Japan. Japan wants to be seen as a peaceful democracy. China remembers the fascist beast under the costume. And Asia has no obligation to let Japan rewrite blood into “security concerns.”

Japan is truly disgusting. It hides behind “postwar peace.” It hides behind “national security concerns.” It hides behind Washington’s leash, pretending that being America’s loyal attack dog against China somehow makes it an “Asian model student” worthy of Western comfort. But none of that erases what Japan did to Asia. Invasion. Massacres. Colonial rule. Rape. Forced sexual slavery. Human experimentation. Biological warfare. The slaughter and humiliation of Asian peoples. And even today, Japan still has the audacity to posture as a victim, while racism against other Asians, rape of minors in Asian countries, and sex tourism remain part of the ugly underside of its so-called “civilized” image. So when China asks Japan when it will sincerely apologize to Asian WWII victims, this is not “provocation.” It is history returning to the room. This time, China did not send emotional slogans. It sent sharp technocrats. From history, morality, international law, and the postwar order, they dismantled the entire Western-made beautification framework around Japan. Japan wants to be seen as a peaceful democracy. China remembers the fascist beast under the costume. And Asia has no obligation to let Japan rewrite blood into “security concerns.”

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

608,450 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🇯🇵 Japan wanted Munich to be a stage; 🇨🇳 China made it a mirror. For decades Japan performed amnesia, but the moment its PM openly claimed a right to intervene in “Taiwan affairs,” history walked back into the room. Wang Yi didn’t escalate, he just diagnosed. A Fascist country that refuses to face its war crimes, but believes it can decide China’s sovereignty, is not seeking “stability,” it is rehearsing old ambitions in new language. And here is the part the West rarely understands: Japan should be grateful for the Chinese government’s restraint, and for how much anti-Japanese sentiment it has contained for decades. Japan mistakes its “politeness” and “obedience” for virtues that erase the past. They don’t. Westerners who never lived through Nanjing, who never saw Unit 731, who never heard the last cries of comfort women, cannot feel what 35 million Chinese deaths carved into our memory. But Chinese people know: beneath the romance of falling cherry blossoms is blood-soaked soil, and beneath the elegance of a kimono are the lice of a past Japan refuses to wash off. On Chinese social media, the mainstream view has been consistent for years: the historical reckoning with Japan is unfinished. And this time, it won’t be outsourced to America. It will be carried out by Chinese people themselves, a completing of the Pacific War that history never allowed China to finish, so these scars do not pass to the next generation. When China warns Japan today, it is not hostility. It is memory refusing to be buried.

🇯🇵 Japan wanted Munich to be a stage; 🇨🇳 China made it a mirror. For decades Japan performed amnesia, but the moment its PM openly claimed a right to intervene in “Taiwan affairs,” history walked back into the room. Wang Yi didn’t escalate, he just diagnosed. A Fascist country that refuses to face its war crimes, but believes it can decide China’s sovereignty, is not seeking “stability,” it is rehearsing old ambitions in new language. And here is the part the West rarely understands: Japan should be grateful for the Chinese government’s restraint, and for how much anti-Japanese sentiment it has contained for decades. Japan mistakes its “politeness” and “obedience” for virtues that erase the past. They don’t. Westerners who never lived through Nanjing, who never saw Unit 731, who never heard the last cries of comfort women, cannot feel what 35 million Chinese deaths carved into our memory. But Chinese people know: beneath the romance of falling cherry blossoms is blood-soaked soil, and beneath the elegance of a kimono are the lice of a past Japan refuses to wash off. On Chinese social media, the mainstream view has been consistent for years: the historical reckoning with Japan is unfinished. And this time, it won’t be outsourced to America. It will be carried out by Chinese people themselves, a completing of the Pacific War that history never allowed China to finish, so these scars do not pass to the next generation. When China warns Japan today, it is not hostility. It is memory refusing to be buried.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

85,739 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Westerners still ask the same question like it’s clever: “Does the rest of the world actually want to be like China? No democracy, repressive on speech and human rights?” They’re looking at the 21st century with 19th and 20th century glasses. The assumption is that 1.4 billion Chinese must be suffering under some evil CCP. Black-and-white thinking that doesn’t fit reality anymore. China’s going to build its own system. It might not match the Western model — and that’s fine by them. When China was weak and divided, nobody was exporting human rights or democracy to them. The British forced opium on China in exchange for tea. Western powers seized territory, set up settlements, and burned the Summer Palace. It remains now unrestored as a permanent reminder of history for Chinese to never be blinded by hubris again. Now the same voices show up acting as saviors: “Don’t you want a better government? What’s wrong with you?” The condescension is unreal says Kishore. China will choose its own path. It may not be perfect in Western eyes, but it’s theirs. Unlike America, they don’t pretend their civilization is a universal model the whole world must copy. They do what works for China. You do what works for you. They’re not exporting their system to anyone. No threat. No need to feel insecure about China succeeding on its own terms. The West needs to drop the savior complex and get used to it. The 21st century isn’t yours to dictate anymore. Paraphrasing Kishore Mahbubani answering questions about China in 2020.

Westerners still ask the same question like it’s clever: “Does the rest of the world actually want to be like China? No democracy, repressive on speech and human rights?” They’re looking at the 21st century with 19th and 20th century glasses. The assumption is that 1.4 billion Chinese must be suffering under some evil CCP. Black-and-white thinking that doesn’t fit reality anymore. China’s going to build its own system. It might not match the Western model — and that’s fine by them. When China was weak and divided, nobody was exporting human rights or democracy to them. The British forced opium on China in exchange for tea. Western powers seized territory, set up settlements, and burned the Summer Palace. It remains now unrestored as a permanent reminder of history for Chinese to never be blinded by hubris again. Now the same voices show up acting as saviors: “Don’t you want a better government? What’s wrong with you?” The condescension is unreal says Kishore. China will choose its own path. It may not be perfect in Western eyes, but it’s theirs. Unlike America, they don’t pretend their civilization is a universal model the whole world must copy. They do what works for China. You do what works for you. They’re not exporting their system to anyone. No threat. No need to feel insecure about China succeeding on its own terms. The West needs to drop the savior complex and get used to it. The 21st century isn’t yours to dictate anymore. Paraphrasing Kishore Mahbubani answering questions about China in 2020.

Larry 長祥

66,269 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇨🇳🇯🇵 China just asked Japan a question that should echo across East Asia. Is the Japanese side trying to repeat history and once again become the source of disaster in the region. China warned that Japan is barreling headlong down the path of remilitarization. It described recent moves as risky and provocative. Some Japanese politicians, it said, are using rhetoric tantamount to war mobilization. Language that echoes the militarist past. China called on all peace loving countries to remain highly vigilant and firmly resist Japan's reckless moves of neo militarism. This is not a diplomatic squabble. This is a warning. Takaichi is pushing Japan toward a future it's own constitution was designed to prevent it. China is watching. The region is watching. History is watching. Japan should answer the question honestly. Not for China. For itself. For the people who remember what happened the last time Japan became a source of disaster.

🇨🇳🇯🇵 China just asked Japan a question that should echo across East Asia. Is the Japanese side trying to repeat history and once again become the source of disaster in the region. China warned that Japan is barreling headlong down the path of remilitarization. It described recent moves as risky and provocative. Some Japanese politicians, it said, are using rhetoric tantamount to war mobilization. Language that echoes the militarist past. China called on all peace loving countries to remain highly vigilant and firmly resist Japan's reckless moves of neo militarism. This is not a diplomatic squabble. This is a warning. Takaichi is pushing Japan toward a future it's own constitution was designed to prevent it. China is watching. The region is watching. History is watching. Japan should answer the question honestly. Not for China. For itself. For the people who remember what happened the last time Japan became a source of disaster.

New Direction AFRICA

221,209 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🇨🇳🇺🇸🇯🇵 Trump’s Davos message wasn’t just aimed at Europe or Canada. It was a quiet warning to Japan’s hardliners — especially Sanae Takaichi. She seems to believe that flattering Trump gives her a license to provoke China. But Trump made something very clear on that stage: He respects strength, not loyalty. He negotiates with major powers, not cheerleaders. And China and Japan do not exist on the same diplomatic tier in his worldview. When Trump praises Xi as “smart and respected” while treating America’s own allies with open disdain, he’s telling them a simple truth: Being a U.S. ally doesn’t make you important. Being useful does. And Tokyo’s fantasies of being a “frontline partner” collapse the moment Washington sees a bigger stage. Japan can cosplay as America’s shield all it wants, but Trump’s geopolitical instincts are transactional and theatrical — and China simply offers him more of both. If Takaichi thinks proximity to Trump will elevate Japan’s status, she might want to rewatch the Davos speech. She wasn’t part of the performance. She wasn’t even in the script.

🇨🇳🇺🇸🇯🇵 Trump’s Davos message wasn’t just aimed at Europe or Canada. It was a quiet warning to Japan’s hardliners — especially Sanae Takaichi. She seems to believe that flattering Trump gives her a license to provoke China. But Trump made something very clear on that stage: He respects strength, not loyalty. He negotiates with major powers, not cheerleaders. And China and Japan do not exist on the same diplomatic tier in his worldview. When Trump praises Xi as “smart and respected” while treating America’s own allies with open disdain, he’s telling them a simple truth: Being a U.S. ally doesn’t make you important. Being useful does. And Tokyo’s fantasies of being a “frontline partner” collapse the moment Washington sees a bigger stage. Japan can cosplay as America’s shield all it wants, but Trump’s geopolitical instincts are transactional and theatrical — and China simply offers him more of both. If Takaichi thinks proximity to Trump will elevate Japan’s status, she might want to rewatch the Davos speech. She wasn’t part of the performance. She wasn’t even in the script.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

73,467 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🔥 This one’s going to sting — especially for those still buying into the “democracy vs. autocracy” fairytale. 🇨🇳 “America doesn’t hate China because it’s bad — but because it’s successful.” — Jeffrey Sachs to 🇮🇳 interviewer on 🇺🇸 hypocrisy Columbia Professor Jeffrey Sachs just said the quiet part out loud — in front of an Indian interviewer. • China didn’t choose to be America’s enemy — it simply became too successful. • The U.S. doesn’t hate China because of what it did, but because of what it achieved. • India is liked today not because of its values, but because it’s not a threat yet. • If India ever reaches China’s level of industrial power, America will target it too. • Trump isn’t trying to move factories from China to India — he doesn’t want India industrialized either. “Don’t think it’s love. The day you rise like China, they’ll treat you the same.” This isn’t a rivalry of values. It’s a rivalry of power. American hegemony doesn’t tolerate success — unless it’s American.

🔥 This one’s going to sting — especially for those still buying into the “democracy vs. autocracy” fairytale. 🇨🇳 “America doesn’t hate China because it’s bad — but because it’s successful.” — Jeffrey Sachs to 🇮🇳 interviewer on 🇺🇸 hypocrisy Columbia Professor Jeffrey Sachs just said the quiet part out loud — in front of an Indian interviewer. • China didn’t choose to be America’s enemy — it simply became too successful. • The U.S. doesn’t hate China because of what it did, but because of what it achieved. • India is liked today not because of its values, but because it’s not a threat yet. • If India ever reaches China’s level of industrial power, America will target it too. • Trump isn’t trying to move factories from China to India — he doesn’t want India industrialized either. “Don’t think it’s love. The day you rise like China, they’ll treat you the same.” This isn’t a rivalry of values. It’s a rivalry of power. American hegemony doesn’t tolerate success — unless it’s American.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

207,516 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🇨🇳🇨🇺🇺🇸 People forget this: while the U.S. builds “island chains” around China, China has never placed military pressure on the American homeland. But if Washington keeps threatening Cuba, maybe the world does need a Chinese military presence in Havana, not for aggression, but for protection. Because China’s connection with Cuba isn’t geopolitical theater. It is memory, it is gratitude, it is the quiet bond of two peoples who carried each other through the hardest decades of the 20th century. When that video of the 83-year-old Cuban man went viral in China, the former flight cadet who trained in Beijing in 1961, tens of millions of Chinese were moved. The Chinese Air Force even visited him in Havana. Not because of politics, but because history remembers kindness. So if the U.S. insists on treating Cuba as something it can threaten or “punish,” it shouldn’t be surprised when Cuba’s friends decide to stand between the bully and the bullied. After all, no one dictates what Cuba does. And China never abandons the people who once called it a brother.

🇨🇳🇨🇺🇺🇸 People forget this: while the U.S. builds “island chains” around China, China has never placed military pressure on the American homeland. But if Washington keeps threatening Cuba, maybe the world does need a Chinese military presence in Havana, not for aggression, but for protection. Because China’s connection with Cuba isn’t geopolitical theater. It is memory, it is gratitude, it is the quiet bond of two peoples who carried each other through the hardest decades of the 20th century. When that video of the 83-year-old Cuban man went viral in China, the former flight cadet who trained in Beijing in 1961, tens of millions of Chinese were moved. The Chinese Air Force even visited him in Havana. Not because of politics, but because history remembers kindness. So if the U.S. insists on treating Cuba as something it can threaten or “punish,” it shouldn’t be surprised when Cuba’s friends decide to stand between the bully and the bullied. After all, no one dictates what Cuba does. And China never abandons the people who once called it a brother.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

64,356 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

China’s Foreign Ministry responded coldly to Trump’s threats: China opposes unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law or authorization from the UN Security Council. In other words: China is not South Korea, Japan, or a pack of NATO clients trained to bark on command. Washington has spent years confusing its own coercive toolkit with global consensus, only to discover that most of the world has no interest in setting its economy on fire just to satisfy American geopolitical theater. Russia did not collapse the way they fantasized. And China is not Russia. China’s economic scale, industrial depth, trade networks, and strategic resilience are in a completely different category. Trump already lost this fight twice. Now the more Washington threatens, the more it pushes China to decouple on its own terms. This is the real source of American hysteria: it cannot win fairly, it cannot compel obedience indefinitely, and it cannot force a sovereign China to kneel. That is why the tantrums keep escalating. Because China is too large to bully, too industrialized to strangle, and too sovereign to kneel.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,808 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Interviewer: Atiku said that if he gets the ADC presidential ticket, 2027 will be his last presidential race. Will you accept to be his running mate? Mr. Peter Obi: At this point, we are not at that stage yet. However, if you look at the word he used, it was “if.” But I can tell you for a fact that I will be on the ballot in 2027. I will only accept the ADC primary if it is through a transparent and credible process. The process people use to come into office is far more important than what they do afterward. You cannot jump into a house through the window and then start cleaning the house.

Interviewer: Atiku said that if he gets the ADC presidential ticket, 2027 will be his last presidential race. Will you accept to be his running mate? Mr. Peter Obi: At this point, we are not at that stage yet. However, if you look at the word he used, it was “if.” But I can tell you for a fact that I will be on the ballot in 2027. I will only accept the ADC primary if it is through a transparent and credible process. The process people use to come into office is far more important than what they do afterward. You cannot jump into a house through the window and then start cleaning the house.

CHUKS 🍥

405,740 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce