Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
A WEF advisor believes that artificial intelligence will one day write a new Bible, leading the masses to the "right" religions "In a few years, there could be religions that are actually right. Just think of a religion whose holy book is written by an artificial intelligence," he says.... show more
11,235 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments
What happened in his childhood to make him hate people so much? I'm guessing dodgeball.
Well AI could hardly write a worse religion than Abrahamism. Read what the ancient scribes actually wrote, not what the priests, rabbis and mullahs say they wrote. Yahweh had no interest in religion. None. The dumkopfs are following a cargo cult.
Psycho!
Ai has given me very wrong responses in several instances. It is not a superhuman mind. It’s a computer.
Naw. They tried that before. Didn't work. Because the Bible is actually God's word for us, and the history of what it means to follow and to not follow God.
Forecast: this guy’s sexual preferences will be given a green light.
Fuck of Yuval you piece of shit
Most WEF advisors are insipid transhumanists
That’s the kind of things people say when they’re high.
Harari is obamas favorite author!🤫
![John Carmack: The code for AGI could conceivably be written by one individual After stepping down as CTO of Meta’s Oculus VR, legendary programmer John Carmack was trying to decide if he would work on nuclear fission or artificial general intelligence (AGI). He ultimately chose AGI. “I think [fission] is possible,” John says. “Somebody should be doing this, but it’s going to involve some politics, decent-sized teams, and a bunch of cross-functional stuff that I don’t love. While artificial general intelligence seems to me like the highest-leverage moment for a single individual potentially in the history of the world.” He explains: “With the things we know about the brain and what we can do with artificial intelligence . . . I’m not a madman for saying that it is likely that the code for artificial general intelligence is going to be tens of thousands of lines of code — not millions of lines of code.” He continues: “This is code that conceivably one individual could write, unlike writing a new web browser or operating system. And based on the progress that machine learning has made in the recent decade, it’s likely that the important things that we don’t know are relatively simple. There’s probably a handful of things — my bet is there’s less than six key insights — that need to be made. Each one of them can probably be written on the back of an envelope. We don’t know what they are, but when they’re put together in concert with GPUs at scale and the data that we all have access to, we can make something that behaves like a human being or living creature and that can then be educated in whatever ways we need to get to the point where we can have universal remote workers where anything that somebody does mediated by a computer, that doesn’t require physical interaction, an AGI will be able to do.” Carmack does not think this will be “unapproachably hard”: “That’s incredibly hubristic to say, but what I said a couple of years ago was that there’s a 50% chance that somewhere there will be signs of life of an AGI in 2030, and I’ve probably increased that slightly — maybe 55-60% now because I do think there’s a little sense of acceleration.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2022)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2001635889982611555/amplify_video_thumb/2001612344477016064/img/T4Lkfg4IuehEJBTH.jpg)
