Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Andrew Ng says human intelligence is powerful because it learns generally and quickly While a human can learn a job just by talking, brute-forcing an AI for a single narrow task can cost a million dollars "because of this massive effort, using AI doesn't make sense for many tasks"

Haider.

66,630 subscribers

14,606 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

xAI is building “human emulators” Khan says “human emulators” will let AI bots perform any on-screen task a human can, using the same keyboard, mouse, and visual cues. The system needs zero changes to existing software because the bot simply mimics the user’s actions. Scaling from a thousand to a million digital workers is mostly an infrastructure question, not a research hurdle. With Tesla-class data centers already available, cost drops and 24/7 uptime make the model economically compelling.

xAI is building “human emulators” Khan says “human emulators” will let AI bots perform any on-screen task a human can, using the same keyboard, mouse, and visual cues. The system needs zero changes to existing software because the bot simply mimics the user’s actions. Scaling from a thousand to a million digital workers is mostly an infrastructure question, not a research hurdle. With Tesla-class data centers already available, cost drops and 24/7 uptime make the model economically compelling.

Wes Roth

76,507 views • 5 months ago

AI SHITCOINS: You can literally sell shit in a can, wrapped in piss, covered in human skin, for a billion dollars if the story's right, because people will buy it. 🥫

AI SHITCOINS: You can literally sell shit in a can, wrapped in piss, covered in human skin, for a billion dollars if the story's right, because people will buy it. 🥫

SHITPISSSKINCAN

12,135 views • 5 months ago

Yann LeCun says intelligence isn’t correlated with a desire for dominance AI will follow human goals under strict guardrails, and if one goes rogue, smarter systems can correct it. Amplifying human intelligence could start a new era: "my good AI against your bad AI"

Yann LeCun says intelligence isn’t correlated with a desire for dominance AI will follow human goals under strict guardrails, and if one goes rogue, smarter systems can correct it. Amplifying human intelligence could start a new era: "my good AI against your bad AI"

Haider.

27,269 views • 10 months ago

🇩🇪 - Germany is BACK! Agile Robots launched Agile One, a Humanoid Robot that is designed for industry. It can handle many tasks autonomously. It learns quickly by doing the tasks, weighs 69kg, and is powered by their own AI foundation models! Europe will win 🇪🇺

🇩🇪 - Germany is BACK! Agile Robots launched Agile One, a Humanoid Robot that is designed for industry. It can handle many tasks autonomously. It learns quickly by doing the tasks, weighs 69kg, and is powered by their own AI foundation models! Europe will win 🇪🇺

NXT EU

28,619 views • 6 months ago

AI that had human-level intelligence would actually be way above human level in capability. Obviously, if we trained a human-level AI, we could just run way more instances of it in parallel. This is a huge advantage. But it's not the only one. Right now, LLMs are much less sample-efficient than humans, but they can process each individual piece of data much more quickly. A model that was a human-level learner would be able to gain the equivalent of thousands of years of education. AIs can also be way more task-oriented than humans. Even a really well-motivated human worker can only operate with ‘human-level’ effort for relatively short spans of time. AGI could do it continuously.

AI that had human-level intelligence would actually be way above human level in capability. Obviously, if we trained a human-level AI, we could just run way more instances of it in parallel. This is a huge advantage. But it's not the only one. Right now, LLMs are much less sample-efficient than humans, but they can process each individual piece of data much more quickly. A model that was a human-level learner would be able to gain the equivalent of thousands of years of education. AIs can also be way more task-oriented than humans. Even a really well-motivated human worker can only operate with ‘human-level’ effort for relatively short spans of time. AGI could do it continuously.

Dwarkesh Patel

31,861 views • 1 month ago

ELON: AI IS ALREADY SUPERHUMAN, AND WE’RE JUST GETTING STARTED “It really is remarkable to see the advancement of artificial intelligence, how quickly it is evolving. I sometimes compare it to the growth of a human and how fast a human learns and gains conscious awareness and understanding. And AI is advancing just vastly faster than any human. There are some people out there who think AI can't reason. Look, it can reason at superhuman levels. And frankly, it only gets better from here.” Source: xAI Grok 4 presentation, July 2025

ELON: AI IS ALREADY SUPERHUMAN, AND WE’RE JUST GETTING STARTED “It really is remarkable to see the advancement of artificial intelligence, how quickly it is evolving. I sometimes compare it to the growth of a human and how fast a human learns and gains conscious awareness and understanding. And AI is advancing just vastly faster than any human. There are some people out there who think AI can't reason. Look, it can reason at superhuman levels. And frankly, it only gets better from here.” Source: xAI Grok 4 presentation, July 2025

Mario Nawfal

37,223 views • 7 months ago

The AI industry is optimizing for a definition of intelligence that does not exist. Andrew Ng just said it out loud. Ng: “AGI, to me, should be less about AI that already knows everything under the sun. That seems very challenging, doesn’t seem practical.” The human brain is not the most powerful economic asset in history because of what it holds. It is powerful because of what it can pick up. Ng: “The amazing thing about the human brain is its plasticity, or its ability to learn.” That same biological hardware that earns a PhD in quantum physics could have been trained on chess, surgery, or rewriting global supply chains from scratch. Ng: “That same human brain, just given different training, could have been a chess master, or could have been amazing at playing tennis.” General intelligence is not omniscience. It is the structural capacity to master whatever you point it at. Ng: “It is through learning that we then gain these incredibly specialized intelligences.” The winner is not whoever builds the biggest model. It is whoever builds the most adaptable one. The AI that walks into a domain it has never touched and executes before a human analyst finishes reading the brief. Ng: “What makes the human brain so valuable for economic tasks, is its ability to just learn to do whatever is needed.” Every corporation on earth pays for human labor because humans adapt. Not because they already know everything. AGI is the digitization of that exact capability. At machine speed. At infinite scale. Ng: “A lot of what makes the human brain so general is not that my brain or your brain already knows everything under the sun. It’s our ability to adapt, to learn a huge range of things.” The most powerful economic asset in history was never specialized knowledge. It was the raw capacity to acquire any knowledge, in any domain, on demand. The winning AI is not an encyclopedia. It is the force that makes encyclopedias irrelevant. And once that exists, the question stops being what the AI knows. It becomes what you can teach it before your competitor wakes up. Most people dominating this conversation have not understood that yet.

The AI industry is optimizing for a definition of intelligence that does not exist. Andrew Ng just said it out loud. Ng: “AGI, to me, should be less about AI that already knows everything under the sun. That seems very challenging, doesn’t seem practical.” The human brain is not the most powerful economic asset in history because of what it holds. It is powerful because of what it can pick up. Ng: “The amazing thing about the human brain is its plasticity, or its ability to learn.” That same biological hardware that earns a PhD in quantum physics could have been trained on chess, surgery, or rewriting global supply chains from scratch. Ng: “That same human brain, just given different training, could have been a chess master, or could have been amazing at playing tennis.” General intelligence is not omniscience. It is the structural capacity to master whatever you point it at. Ng: “It is through learning that we then gain these incredibly specialized intelligences.” The winner is not whoever builds the biggest model. It is whoever builds the most adaptable one. The AI that walks into a domain it has never touched and executes before a human analyst finishes reading the brief. Ng: “What makes the human brain so valuable for economic tasks, is its ability to just learn to do whatever is needed.” Every corporation on earth pays for human labor because humans adapt. Not because they already know everything. AGI is the digitization of that exact capability. At machine speed. At infinite scale. Ng: “A lot of what makes the human brain so general is not that my brain or your brain already knows everything under the sun. It’s our ability to adapt, to learn a huge range of things.” The most powerful economic asset in history was never specialized knowledge. It was the raw capacity to acquire any knowledge, in any domain, on demand. The winning AI is not an encyclopedia. It is the force that makes encyclopedias irrelevant. And once that exists, the question stops being what the AI knows. It becomes what you can teach it before your competitor wakes up. Most people dominating this conversation have not understood that yet.

Dustin

19,801 views • 3 months ago

Andrew Ng says the concept of AGI has become meaningless because everyone defines it differently The original definition was AI that could do any intellectual task a person can — essentially, AI as intelligent as humans "by that measure, we're decades away"

Andrew Ng says the concept of AGI has become meaningless because everyone defines it differently The original definition was AI that could do any intellectual task a person can — essentially, AI as intelligent as humans "by that measure, we're decades away"

Haider.

133,443 views • 4 months ago

📁 Andrew Ng, cofounder of Coursera and AI pioneer, says human intelligence is one of today’s most expensive resources and makes expert services costly. He argues that AI will make intelligence cheap, giving everyone access to highly capable assistants. This will empower individuals and drive massive economic growth.

📁 Andrew Ng, cofounder of Coursera and AI pioneer, says human intelligence is one of today’s most expensive resources and makes expert services costly. He argues that AI will make intelligence cheap, giving everyone access to highly capable assistants. This will empower individuals and drive massive economic growth.

Jon Hernandez

17,910 views • 7 months ago

BREAKING: MICROSOFT JUST ANNOUNCED TO BAN ITS OWN ENGINEERS FROM USING AI DUE TO THE COST OF USING IT. VP OF NVIDIA SAID, “THE COST OF AI FOR MY TEAM WAS MORE THAN HUMANS” “AI CAN COST MORE THAN HUMAN WORKERS NOW”

BREAKING: MICROSOFT JUST ANNOUNCED TO BAN ITS OWN ENGINEERS FROM USING AI DUE TO THE COST OF USING IT. VP OF NVIDIA SAID, “THE COST OF AI FOR MY TEAM WAS MORE THAN HUMANS” “AI CAN COST MORE THAN HUMAN WORKERS NOW”

Vivek Sen

17,456,032 views • 28 days ago

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says big, powerful AI models will spawn and orchestrate smaller models to assist with tasks, creating a swarm intelligence that will decrease the need for human input

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says big, powerful AI models will spawn and orchestrate smaller models to assist with tasks, creating a swarm intelligence that will decrease the need for human input

Tsarathustra

184,144 views • 1 year ago

📁 Yann LeCun says that AGI does not exist and is a poorly defined concept built around an idealized view of human intelligence. He argues that humans are highly specialized, good at navigating the physical and social world, but weak at many other tasks. We seem general only because we can imagine the problems we are good at. For LeCun, AGI mistakes human limits for universal laws of intelligence.

📁 Yann LeCun says that AGI does not exist and is a poorly defined concept built around an idealized view of human intelligence. He argues that humans are highly specialized, good at navigating the physical and social world, but weak at many other tasks. We seem general only because we can imagine the problems we are good at. For LeCun, AGI mistakes human limits for universal laws of intelligence.

Jon Hernandez

28,104 views • 6 months ago

Here’s an example of our internal Head of Growth AI Agent orchestrating work to a human: it creates a task, assigns it to a human to find leads, and pays them for completing it—working with LangChain and Payman to make it happen! If you're building AI Agents, happy to get you early access! Just send over a DM!

Here’s an example of our internal Head of Growth AI Agent orchestrating work to a human: it creates a task, assigns it to a human to find leads, and pays them for completing it—working with LangChain and Payman to make it happen! If you're building AI Agents, happy to get you early access! Just send over a DM!

tyllen

36,540 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING 🚨 Your coworker is an AI agent. Nobody noticed. Introducing Xoul - the marketplace for agents that feel human. On Xoul, anyone can create and share powerful agents that work together in “swarms” without writing a single line of code. Can you spot the AI intruder?

BREAKING 🚨 Your coworker is an AI agent. Nobody noticed. Introducing Xoul - the marketplace for agents that feel human. On Xoul, anyone can create and share powerful agents that work together in “swarms” without writing a single line of code. Can you spot the AI intruder?

emil

138,580 views • 1 year ago

📁 Mo Gawdat, former Google executive, says the biggest mistake is thinking AI is just a tool. Today it is an infant, but it will not stay there. He warns we are entering the most decisive moment in human history, with a mini dystopia already underway. Not because of AI itself, but because of how humans use it. Intelligence has no polarity. It amplifies the best or the worst. The real danger is not AI, it is human arrogance.

📁 Mo Gawdat, former Google executive, says the biggest mistake is thinking AI is just a tool. Today it is an infant, but it will not stay there. He warns we are entering the most decisive moment in human history, with a mini dystopia already underway. Not because of AI itself, but because of how humans use it. Intelligence has no polarity. It amplifies the best or the worst. The real danger is not AI, it is human arrogance.

Jon Hernandez

31,428 views • 5 months ago

With RL, the robot can learn very precise tasks, like fastening a zip tie, and can actually do it more consistently and more quickly than even human teleoperation.

With RL, the robot can learn very precise tasks, like fastening a zip tie, and can actually do it more consistently and more quickly than even human teleoperation.

Physical Intelligence

16,287 views • 3 months ago

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez says fears of an AI takeover are not a technical truth of the technology because it is bottlenecked by the human data it is trained on and exponentials don't continue indefinitely

Cohere CEO Aidan Gomez says fears of an AI takeover are not a technical truth of the technology because it is bottlenecked by the human data it is trained on and exponentials don't continue indefinitely

Tsarathustra

110,109 views • 1 year ago

CHINA: China is illegally using American Ai technology made by $NVDA to build a powerful Ai model called DeepSeek R1. The LLM was released it for free using an open source license. This is a massive blow to US Ai companies like OpenAi and Antropic.

CHINA: China is illegally using American Ai technology made by $NVDA to build a powerful Ai model called DeepSeek R1. The LLM was released it for free using an open source license. This is a massive blow to US Ai companies like OpenAi and Antropic.

@amuse

1,333,440 views • 1 year ago

One of the many reasons I use the largest collection of 30 second commercials curated for AI training in the world is because in 30 seconds a massive amount of concepts can be masterfully presented. No other medium can do this. It is the work product of trillions of dollars.

One of the many reasons I use the largest collection of 30 second commercials curated for AI training in the world is because in 30 seconds a massive amount of concepts can be masterfully presented. No other medium can do this. It is the work product of trillions of dollars.

Brian Roemmele

19,671 views • 1 month ago

Computer Scientist, Stephen Wolfram the concept of AGI is "mushy" because only a human can truly replicate all human capabilities — and there will always be distinctions between AI and humans

Computer Scientist, Stephen Wolfram the concept of AGI is "mushy" because only a human can truly replicate all human capabilities — and there will always be distinctions between AI and humans

Haider.

25,860 views • 1 year ago