Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

AOC: In a so-called rules-based order, the rules for whom? For too long, the rules only applied to the US, Europe, its allies, and we would carve out exceptions for the global south. When you carve out exceptions to the rules, the exceptions become the rules.

Acyn

716,001 subscribers

66,385 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When you have a rules-based order where you carve out exceptions to our values, eventually the exceptions become the rules.

When you have a rules-based order where you carve out exceptions to our values, eventually the exceptions become the rules.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

179,971 views • 6 months ago

AOC: "Think that Prime Minister carney's remarks that the World Economic Forum were, um, were words that run around the world in raising this question. But I think that also, in his remarks, as long and as well as part of this larger conversation, there was this undertone, this undercurrent, this suggestion that it was a rules, based order sometimes. And I think that that is the, the issue that lies before us is that in a in a so called rules, based order, the rules for whom, because for all too long, the rules only applied to the United States, europe, its allies, and we would carve out exceptions for the global South. And I think that when you have a rules, based order where you carve out exceptions to our values, exceptions to our rules, eventually the exceptions become the rules. And I think that, to your original point, over the last five years, we've seen such a breaking and such a fraying of these alleged Western values that people wonder if it ever existed in the first place. So I don't know if it's necessarily that we were in a post, if we are in a post, rules based order, I think it's possible that we were in a pre rules based order, and we have an opportunity to explore what a world would look like if we upheld democracy. Human rights, trade that actually centers working class people, instead of accruing overwhelmingly the benefits of trade to the wealthiest Um. But if we reoriented a new era that could actually help people and show how foreign policy and healthy foreign policy can show up and help them in their lives."

AOC: "Think that Prime Minister carney's remarks that the World Economic Forum were, um, were words that run around the world in raising this question. But I think that also, in his remarks, as long and as well as part of this larger conversation, there was this undertone, this undercurrent, this suggestion that it was a rules, based order sometimes. And I think that that is the, the issue that lies before us is that in a in a so called rules, based order, the rules for whom, because for all too long, the rules only applied to the United States, europe, its allies, and we would carve out exceptions for the global South. And I think that when you have a rules, based order where you carve out exceptions to our values, exceptions to our rules, eventually the exceptions become the rules. And I think that, to your original point, over the last five years, we've seen such a breaking and such a fraying of these alleged Western values that people wonder if it ever existed in the first place. So I don't know if it's necessarily that we were in a post, if we are in a post, rules based order, I think it's possible that we were in a pre rules based order, and we have an opportunity to explore what a world would look like if we upheld democracy. Human rights, trade that actually centers working class people, instead of accruing overwhelmingly the benefits of trade to the wealthiest Um. But if we reoriented a new era that could actually help people and show how foreign policy and healthy foreign policy can show up and help them in their lives."

Winter

794,575 views • 6 months ago

AOC: “What we are seeking is a return to a rules-based order that eliminates the hypocrisies around when too often in the west we look the other way for inconvenient populations, to act out these paradoxes.” Huh?

AOC: “What we are seeking is a return to a rules-based order that eliminates the hypocrisies around when too often in the west we look the other way for inconvenient populations, to act out these paradoxes.” Huh?

Chief Nerd

1,739,844 views • 6 months ago

⭕️ Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) used the Munich Security Conference to pitch a new international order that “eliminates the hypocrisies” of the past by “centering working-class people.” She framed this as a necessary alternative to the Trump administration’s policies, which she accused of “withdrawing the United States from the entire world.” “I don’t know if it’s necessarily that we are in a post–rules-based order,” she said at a panel discussion about the rise of populism. “I think it’s possible that we were in a pre–rules-based order.” Pointing to the genocide in Gaza and other crises around the world, Ocasio-Cortez stated that selective adherence to international law was corroding the system itself: “When you have a rules-based order where you carve out exceptions to our values, eventually the exceptions become the rules.” Ocasio-Cortez also criticized Trump’s foreign policy as a retreat into the Western Hemisphere, while allowing Putin to “saber-rattle around Europe” and "bully our own allies there." She described the current moment as an “age of authoritarianism” and argued that “working class-centered politics” is needed to confront and reverse that trend. A clip from one of her panel appearances yesterday is below ⬇️

⭕️ Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) used the Munich Security Conference to pitch a new international order that “eliminates the hypocrisies” of the past by “centering working-class people.” She framed this as a necessary alternative to the Trump administration’s policies, which she accused of “withdrawing the United States from the entire world.” “I don’t know if it’s necessarily that we are in a post–rules-based order,” she said at a panel discussion about the rise of populism. “I think it’s possible that we were in a pre–rules-based order.” Pointing to the genocide in Gaza and other crises around the world, Ocasio-Cortez stated that selective adherence to international law was corroding the system itself: “When you have a rules-based order where you carve out exceptions to our values, eventually the exceptions become the rules.” Ocasio-Cortez also criticized Trump’s foreign policy as a retreat into the Western Hemisphere, while allowing Putin to “saber-rattle around Europe” and "bully our own allies there." She described the current moment as an “age of authoritarianism” and argued that “working class-centered politics” is needed to confront and reverse that trend. A clip from one of her panel appearances yesterday is below ⬇️

Drop Site

32,153 views • 6 months ago

This is incredible. This is Graham Allison, the Founding Dean of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government - who taught generations of US leaders - and former Assistant Secretary of Defense. Here is what he says on the "rules-based order": "We say we're the exceptional nation. What does that mean? That means we make the rules and you're supposed to obey the rules. But we don't obey the rules. So we say we're for the rules-based order. Excuse me the rules-based order was the basis with which we invaded Iraq? I don't think so. That we occupied Afghanistan? I don't think so. The US has made a lot of mistakes of unnecessary wars."

This is incredible. This is Graham Allison, the Founding Dean of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government - who taught generations of US leaders - and former Assistant Secretary of Defense. Here is what he says on the "rules-based order": "We say we're the exceptional nation. What does that mean? That means we make the rules and you're supposed to obey the rules. But we don't obey the rules. So we say we're for the rules-based order. Excuse me the rules-based order was the basis with which we invaded Iraq? I don't think so. That we occupied Afghanistan? I don't think so. The US has made a lot of mistakes of unnecessary wars."

Arnaud Bertrand

1,061,241 views • 2 years ago

WOW … Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez pulls a Kamala in Munich … how embarrassing for America when this is the best the Democrat Party has to offer.😳😲 Could someone please decipher what she said, because it’s all word-salad to me. “We are in a new day and a new time. But that does not mean that a majority of Americans are willing to walk away from a rules based order and that we’re ready to walk away from our commitment to democracy.” “I think what we identify in a rules based order, hypocrisy is vulnerability and so I think what we are seeking is a return to a rules based order that eliminates the hypocrisies around when too often in the West we look the other way for inconvenient populations to act out, to act out the paradoxes.” The only thing I took from this is a new phrase the leftist want to put into our vocabulary … and that is the phrase … ‘Rules Based Order’

WOW … Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez pulls a Kamala in Munich … how embarrassing for America when this is the best the Democrat Party has to offer.😳😲 Could someone please decipher what she said, because it’s all word-salad to me. “We are in a new day and a new time. But that does not mean that a majority of Americans are willing to walk away from a rules based order and that we’re ready to walk away from our commitment to democracy.” “I think what we identify in a rules based order, hypocrisy is vulnerability and so I think what we are seeking is a return to a rules based order that eliminates the hypocrisies around when too often in the West we look the other way for inconvenient populations to act out, to act out the paradoxes.” The only thing I took from this is a new phrase the leftist want to put into our vocabulary … and that is the phrase … ‘Rules Based Order’

C-Reason🇺🇸

27,952 views • 6 months ago

Rules are Rules for Everyone 🔥🔥 No exceptions. No favoritism. No backdoor deals ✅✅ The One & Only Straightforward Government Tamil Nadu has witnessed so far — under #CMJosephVijay 💯🦁👏🔥 TVK Vijay | CMOTamilNadu

Rules are Rules for Everyone 🔥🔥 No exceptions. No favoritism. No backdoor deals ✅✅ The One & Only Straightforward Government Tamil Nadu has witnessed so far — under #CMJosephVijay 💯🦁👏🔥 TVK Vijay | CMOTamilNadu

TVK Sqυα∂💥

17,806 views • 2 months ago

How about that rules based order? So, what are the rules exactly?

How about that rules based order? So, what are the rules exactly?

Lord Bebo

44,490 views • 7 months ago

I just want the rules to be the rules... for everyone.

I just want the rules to be the rules... for everyone.

Trevor Noah

79,389 views • 1 month ago

"The rules-based global order is under threat," declares PM Carney. "We can nostalgically look back and long for the old order to somehow return, or we can build a new one with purpose and partnership."

"The rules-based global order is under threat," declares PM Carney. "We can nostalgically look back and long for the old order to somehow return, or we can build a new one with purpose and partnership."

Rebel News

66,340 views • 1 year ago

Senegals dilemma!!! Unfortunately, Rules are Rules and emotions dont count when Laws and Rules are applied.. THE GAME!

Senegals dilemma!!! Unfortunately, Rules are Rules and emotions dont count when Laws and Rules are applied.. THE GAME!

The Big Bird🦅⚽️

23,212 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. JUST BROKE ITS OWN RULES BY KIDNAPPING A FOREIGN LEADER" The U.S. just captured Maduro in a covert military strike, and Alex Christoforou is calling out the hypocrisy. Washington constantly lectures the world about “rules-based order” and “international law,” but just kidnapped a sitting head of state. Alex points out how the U.S. would react if the roles were reversed, say, if drones targeted a Western leader. According to him there are no rules when it comes to American power. Not anymore. "The United States always lectures everybody about international law and the rules-based order. Well, you just went into a country and you kidnapped the internationally recognized leader of that country. You can't go after leaders, right? Isn't that what we've been told? There are certain rules to war or to conflict. And there are certain international rules. You just can't go in there and grab the leader of another country. But we're dealing with the United States, and so, you know, there are no rules." Alex Christoforou

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪 "THE U.S. JUST BROKE ITS OWN RULES BY KIDNAPPING A FOREIGN LEADER" The U.S. just captured Maduro in a covert military strike, and Alex Christoforou is calling out the hypocrisy. Washington constantly lectures the world about “rules-based order” and “international law,” but just kidnapped a sitting head of state. Alex points out how the U.S. would react if the roles were reversed, say, if drones targeted a Western leader. According to him there are no rules when it comes to American power. Not anymore. "The United States always lectures everybody about international law and the rules-based order. Well, you just went into a country and you kidnapped the internationally recognized leader of that country. You can't go after leaders, right? Isn't that what we've been told? There are certain rules to war or to conflict. And there are certain international rules. You just can't go in there and grab the leader of another country. But we're dealing with the United States, and so, you know, there are no rules." Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

82,233 views • 7 months ago

AG Merrick Garland: “We do not have different rules for Democrats or Republicans, different rules for the powerful or the powerless, different rules for the rich or the poor.”

AG Merrick Garland: “We do not have different rules for Democrats or Republicans, different rules for the powerful or the powerless, different rules for the rich or the poor.”

Benny Johnson

3,060,645 views • 3 years ago

Kamala Harris: The senate judiciary committee has the power to create the rules for its committee they don't have to go to the whole senate for a vote We should demand if we win back the senate that the senate judiciary committee have the strength to put in place rules that would include if a nominee for a federal court or the supreme court comes before them and starts lying, that they hold them in contempt.

Kamala Harris: The senate judiciary committee has the power to create the rules for its committee they don't have to go to the whole senate for a vote We should demand if we win back the senate that the senate judiciary committee have the strength to put in place rules that would include if a nominee for a federal court or the supreme court comes before them and starts lying, that they hold them in contempt.

Acyn

36,006 views • 22 days ago

Even in FIFA there’s one rule for you (in Africa or the global south), there’s another for the West and there’s a special one for the United States. On Sunday when Argentina face Spain in the final, FIFA will bend its rules once again to accommodate America. This is why you should never feel any guilt breaching international rules.

Even in FIFA there’s one rule for you (in Africa or the global south), there’s another for the West and there’s a special one for the United States. On Sunday when Argentina face Spain in the final, FIFA will bend its rules once again to accommodate America. This is why you should never feel any guilt breaching international rules.

Biggest Mack

27,370 views • 1 month ago

French🇫🇷 President Emmanuel Macron casually admits that Donald Trump’s bombing of Iran’s🇮🇷 nuclear facilities were illegal under international law This is the essence of the ‘rules-based order’; rules for thee, but not for me. International law is only supposed to contain the global south, while letting neocolonial Europe and Washington run rampant doing whatever they like.

French🇫🇷 President Emmanuel Macron casually admits that Donald Trump’s bombing of Iran’s🇮🇷 nuclear facilities were illegal under international law This is the essence of the ‘rules-based order’; rules for thee, but not for me. International law is only supposed to contain the global south, while letting neocolonial Europe and Washington run rampant doing whatever they like.

Afshin Rattansi

61,412 views • 1 year ago

“A world based on predictable rules is better than a world in which force is the only rule.” Spain’s foreign minister José Manuel Albares tells @tommackenzietv and Anna Edwards that Europe needs to be more vocal in defending a rules-based global order

“A world based on predictable rules is better than a world in which force is the only rule.” Spain’s foreign minister José Manuel Albares tells @tommackenzietv and Anna Edwards that Europe needs to be more vocal in defending a rules-based global order

Bloomberg

55,602 views • 5 months ago

A Eulogy to mark the death of the Rules-Based Order - 🧵

A Eulogy to mark the death of the Rules-Based Order - 🧵

Akunjee 🖋

63,484 views • 5 months ago