Attackers stopped working alone. They coordinate now—through agents. So, we built Project Perception: our new agentic security system. The video explains it better than a caption can.

Security agents are moving from alerting to acting. The hard boundary is no longer only "can the model find risk?" It is: what can the agent change, with which credentials, after what evidence and approval? Defensive AI needs scoped actuators, reproducible proof, human review for high-impact actions, audit logs, and rollback paths.

Great perspective. Finding risk is important, but helping defenders turn insight into action, without losing visibility or control, is where the real value comes in.

Closed-loop cyber agents are powerful, but autonomy needs explicit interruption points. Will Project Perception expose per-agent evidence, confidence and human-approval policies before green agents take corrective action?

The conversation around security is finally shifting from "How do we stop attacks?" to "How do we stay resilient when they happen?" That's a much healthier mindset for the future.

so how does it handle a compromised agent feeding bad intel back into the loop

I spend too much time separating signal from noise in threat detection. How does Project Perception handle fidelity? 📡

That's fantastic. While you're at it, can you please fix your security flaws that cause me to get repeated MS Authenticator approval requests that I didn't originate? Look at Reddit. It's a widespread issue.