正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Barbara follows a low-carb, plant based diet. Her typical breakfast is: Cherries and peaches dipped in chia seed, almonds, sour dough bread, olive oil, avocado, cayenne pepper, black beans. She explains the dangers of a high-carb diet:

218,830 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

12 条评论

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

Meet the 71-year-old woman who can cure any disease: Barbara O'Neill. She’s the world's #1 holistic doctor. Here are her 7 controversial rules for superior health & longevity: 1) Carbs make you fat, not fats:

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

2) Exercise fasted: If you eat a lot of carbs, you most likely have glycogen left over the next morning. Barbara explains why that is bad:

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

If you hate working out on an empty stomach, try BCAAs. It's the best way to provide your body with energy during exercise, especially when glycogen stores are low. These have all 9 essential amino acids, no calories, no fillers, and no bloating:

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

3) Spend more time in the sun: Her only rules? No more than 15 minutes at a time and absolutely no sunscreen. Here's why "the doctor in the sky" is so powerful:

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

4) Stop putting nylon/polyester on your feet: Your feet are the largest pours on your body and when you sweat, they will absorb the chemicals. Barbara suggests natural fibers like cotton and leather.

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

5) Use more castor oil: Barbara says you can use it to heal everything from cataracts to bunions. Here's how useful it is:

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

6) Remove glucose to remove cancer cells: Barbara says cancer cells consume 15x the amount of glucose compared to normal cells. Here's why removing it works:

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

7) HIIT is the best form of exercise: Why? - Releases human growth hormone (active for 24hrs) - Can be done in just 15 min - Strengthens the heart PS: Don't forget to do it on an empty stomach!

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

What do you think of her rules? Are they just crazy or do they work? Let me know down below!

Jake Gilman 的头像
Jake Gilman1 年前

I hope you've enjoyed this thread. (And maybe even learned something) If you did, consider reposting it to share with friends:

CompareMarketplaces.com 的头像
CompareMarketplaces.com1 年前

The #lowest #price Macadamia nuts 🌰 in Amazon US is $0.53/Oz as per comparemarketplaces . com. How does the price compare to your local market #amazon #macadamia #ad

Jennifer Babich 的头像
Jennifer Babich1 年前

That breakfast alone has over 40 g of net carbs. That’s more than you should get in a whole day on keto.

相关视频

Last night Dr David Unwin was on mainstream news talking about the benefits of reducing carbs for those living with diabetes. The results he gets are amazing. I know it can be replicated by others because I copy what he does in my own clinical practice using David Oliver, Freshwell resources (which are free btw). As a result, in 2024 forty of my patients achieved remission too. The news report featured an endocrinologist Shivani Misra who, at the 4mins 27s timestamp in the video, said: "If someone does a low carb with higher fat what does that mean for their cholesterol and their cardiovascular disease risk? We don't know the answer to this" I'm here to tell you this is a false statement. The research has been done. Let me show you: In 2020 a meta analysis looking at the effects of low carb on CVD risk found: "For total cholesterol there was no significant change in the data corresponding to low-carbohydrate diets lasting 12–23 months and over 24 months" With regards LDL the meta analysis says: "For plasma LDL, as the forest map shows, that there was no significant difference between the low-carbohydrate diet group and the control group at 6–11 months, 12–23 months, and 24 months" All other factors improved (blood pressure, triglycerides, etc) The meta analysis concluded: "In conclusion, the overall effect of a low-carbohydrate diet on cardiovascular risk factors tended to be favorable at less than 6 months and 6–11 months, but after 2 years of a low-carbohydrate diet, there was no significant effect on cardiovascular risk factors" So short term: CVD risk factors are improved, long term, things don't get worse". This mirrors what I see in clinical practice and with myself having been low carb full time since the start of 2020 - all my CVD risk markers are in the normal range. Study source: The reporter also talks about low carb as a "restrictive diet". What's more restrictive: Giving up bagels, bread, sweets and other junk IN FAVOUR OF protein, vegetables etc Or Giving up solid food entirely for a 850kcal liquid diet for months? Despite the latter being far more restrictive it has been rolled out nationally by the NHS. Nothing wrong with this as it works but so does low carb. Why not give patients a choice? The reporter also says Dr Unwins results are just because of the support he provides. Whilst support matters (a lot), this is blatant misinformation. Plenty of studies show that reducing carbs is disproportionately better for those with diabetes than low fat. Here are some: In 2023 Novo Nordisk published a randomized controlled trial comparing low carb to low fat for diabetes. They found: 🩸 Low carb led to the greatest reduction in hba1c 💉 Only the low carb group reduced medications 📉 Low carb had the greatest reduction in triglycerides + higher HDL (LDL was similar) ⚖️ Low carb group lost more weight + more fat spontaneously despite eating more calories 🩸 Systolic blood pressure was lower for low carb The low carb group non significantly raises their LDL but 0.23mmol. The researchers said: "we consider the beneficial effects of low carb to outweigh the minor increase in LDL (0.23mmol) induced by the diet. This is supported by other studies" So low carb is better and CVD risk markers overall improved. Naturally, the study was hidden behind a Paywall. Link: I can hear the skeptics now: "But Mike, this is one study, it's not enough" Ok here's a meta analysis showing that hba1c is directly proportional to the carbs eaten: This meta analysis concluded:

Mike - Low Carb Dietitian

17,028 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨New science DEBATE released on HIGH CARB vs KETO: What the new Tim Noakes vs Louise Burke debate actually shows 👇 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition just released it big debate between two of the biggest names in exercise performance asking one loaded question: does a low-carbohydrate diet impair endurance performance? On one side is Louise Burke, one of the most influential sports nutrition researchers in the world. Her argument: yes, low carb can impair performance? She is not saying every athlete must eat high-carb all the time. She is saying performance depends on the event, intensity, environment, training status, sex, and the athlete in front of you. Her biggest physiological point is fuel economy. Near an athlete’s oxidative ceiling (i.e., elite race pace), she argues that carbohydrate produces more usable energy per liter of oxygen than fat. So even if keto adaptation dramatically raises fat oxidation, that does not automatically mean better speed or power. Now I am skeptical of this point, since we have conducted Randomized Controlled Trails in both runners and ironman competitors and showed that athletes at 86% of their VO2max can utilize fat as the predominant fuel while on a very low carb diet and STILL maintain performance. On the other side, Tim Noakes argues: low carb does not necessarily impair performance when athletes are adapted long enough. He points out that many “keto hurts performance” studies are short, often under four weeks, and that several randomized trials lasting four to six weeks report similar performance between high-carb and low-carb groups. He also reframes fatigue. Instead of saying muscle glycogen is always the main limiter, he argues that during prolonged exercise, maintaining blood glucose, the small glucose pool is the most important. In our trial, 10 grams of carbohydrate per hour improved prolonged cycling performance after both diets. Noakes and Burke also did something really special: they developed a CONSENSUS article where they explored key points of AGREEMENT and DISAGREEMENT for future research. This is the coolest part and in my opinion was one of the verty unique aspect of these three studies My take is this: It is not "team high carb" versus "team keto." The weight of the evidence demonstrates that 1) BOTH high and low carb diets can work, and that 2) Carbohydrates during prolonged exercise are valuable...but 3) How this is applied depends on the individual athlete. What's your take?

Andrew Koutnik, Ph.D.

15,181 次观看 • 4 个月前