正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents, in Texas, admitted, on camera, that they illegally pulled over a woman, and still demand to see her ID. In the video, the agent tells the driver that they are looking for a woman, and say the person’s name they are looking for. The driver immediately... responded that they had the wrong person. The agent responded, “I know. I understand that.” But, instead of ending the stop… he continued to harass her, and asked, “Are you going to be childish?” Then he doubled down… saying she looked like the person they were looking for, and that he needed her ID. That’s when she pushed back and said, “bullshit.” And pointed out that they hadn’t even run her plates, because then they would know who she was… So, to break down what just happened: The ICE agents didn’t have a match on the vehicle registration. They were told, directly, they had the wrong person. They admitted that they knew that. And they still continued to demand to see her ID based on “she looks like her.” The Fourth Amendment requires more than a resemblance. It requires reasonable suspicion you are involved in a crime, or the law enforcement saw you commit a crime. If “you look like somebody” is enough to pull someone over, then there’s no meaningful limit left on who can be pulled over… which puts everyone in danger.show more

Jesus Freakin Congress

55,235 subscribers

31,219 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally demand a woman prove her citizenship, then lie about having a warrant for someone connected to her home, and refuse to show it, in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents confront a woman outside her home and demand she hand over her ID to “prove” she is a U.S. citizen, something they have no legal authority to require without reasonable suspicion of a specific crime. She asks why they need her ID. They tell her they have a “target” who lives at the address. So she asks, “Who is the target?” An agent responds, “We have to make sure you aren’t our target,” then immediately asks, “Do you live at this address?” She says yes. The person filming points out the obvious and tells her she should call 911, because she already stated she’s a citizen and ICE has no jurisdiction over U.S. citizens. That’s when the agent says, “She never said she was a citizen. Calm down.” The woman corrects him. She clearly states she is a citizen, and explains they never asked her about her status, they just demanded ID, which again, is not legal. The agent repeats himself, claiming they have a target connected to the home and want to make sure she isn’t that person. She then asks the only question that matters: “Do you have a warrant?” An agent says, “Yes, we have a warrant for their arrest.” She asks to see it. They refuse. Instead, the agent says, “I’ve got to make sure you are the person.” That’s still not how warrants work. If ICE actually had a valid warrant, they would already know who they were looking for, would not be guessing, and would be legally required to present it on request. Standing outside a home doesn’t change that. You don’t have to identify yourself just so federal agents can decide whether their claimed warrant applies to you. This is a textbook ICE intimidation tactic… demand ID, lie about warrants, deny proof, and hope people don’t know their rights. ICE/Border Patrol agents are harassing U.S. citizens in their own neighborhood, fishing for consent they are not entitled to. And this is how rights get erased, not all at once, but slowly, through lies, pressure, and people being told to “calm down.”

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally demand a woman prove her citizenship, then lie about having a warrant for someone connected to her home, and refuse to show it, in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents confront a woman outside her home and demand she hand over her ID to “prove” she is a U.S. citizen, something they have no legal authority to require without reasonable suspicion of a specific crime. She asks why they need her ID. They tell her they have a “target” who lives at the address. So she asks, “Who is the target?” An agent responds, “We have to make sure you aren’t our target,” then immediately asks, “Do you live at this address?” She says yes. The person filming points out the obvious and tells her she should call 911, because she already stated she’s a citizen and ICE has no jurisdiction over U.S. citizens. That’s when the agent says, “She never said she was a citizen. Calm down.” The woman corrects him. She clearly states she is a citizen, and explains they never asked her about her status, they just demanded ID, which again, is not legal. The agent repeats himself, claiming they have a target connected to the home and want to make sure she isn’t that person. She then asks the only question that matters: “Do you have a warrant?” An agent says, “Yes, we have a warrant for their arrest.” She asks to see it. They refuse. Instead, the agent says, “I’ve got to make sure you are the person.” That’s still not how warrants work. If ICE actually had a valid warrant, they would already know who they were looking for, would not be guessing, and would be legally required to present it on request. Standing outside a home doesn’t change that. You don’t have to identify yourself just so federal agents can decide whether their claimed warrant applies to you. This is a textbook ICE intimidation tactic… demand ID, lie about warrants, deny proof, and hope people don’t know their rights. ICE/Border Patrol agents are harassing U.S. citizens in their own neighborhood, fishing for consent they are not entitled to. And this is how rights get erased, not all at once, but slowly, through lies, pressure, and people being told to “calm down.”

Jesus Freakin Congress

443,454 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents demanding a U.S. citizen prove his citizenship… this time, in Philadelphia. In the video, ICE agents box in a man’s car and immediately demand ID, without giving an explanation… Just, “There is a subject we are looking for.” The man responds exactly how anyone who knows their rights would: “What did I do?” And that matters… Because under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement cannot detain you just to “check.” They need reasonable, articulable suspicion that you committed a crime, or are the specific person they’re looking for. Not just the same race, or, “you look like someone.” When agents surround a vehicle so you can’t leave, that’s a seizure, legally. That triggers constitutional protections. Instead of articulating a reason, the agent shifts the language: “I need to verify your identity.” No, they don’t. They can only demand identification if the stop, itself, is lawful. And the stop is only lawful if they can clearly explain why they believe you are the subject they’re looking for. Notice what they never say in the video: -They never describe the suspect. -They never state a crime. -They never explain how he matches the person they are “looking for.” Just, “we’re looking for someone.” That is not enough. Then, the agent tries to grab the man’s ID without consent. The man pulls it back and says, “Don’t touch my ID.” He’s right. Officers don’t get to physically seize your property without legal authority. The agent then looks at the ID from a distance and walks away. Which tells us something important… If they truly had probable cause, this would not have ended with a casual glance and retreat. ICE does not have authority to randomly stop citizens to “verify” they’re not someone else. That is exactly the kind of policing the Constitution was written to prevent. If agents can box in your car, demand your identity without stating a crime, and fish for compliance… then everyone’s rights are conditional. And conditional rights aren’t rights at all.

🚨Another day, another video of ICE agents demanding a U.S. citizen prove his citizenship… this time, in Philadelphia. In the video, ICE agents box in a man’s car and immediately demand ID, without giving an explanation… Just, “There is a subject we are looking for.” The man responds exactly how anyone who knows their rights would: “What did I do?” And that matters… Because under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement cannot detain you just to “check.” They need reasonable, articulable suspicion that you committed a crime, or are the specific person they’re looking for. Not just the same race, or, “you look like someone.” When agents surround a vehicle so you can’t leave, that’s a seizure, legally. That triggers constitutional protections. Instead of articulating a reason, the agent shifts the language: “I need to verify your identity.” No, they don’t. They can only demand identification if the stop, itself, is lawful. And the stop is only lawful if they can clearly explain why they believe you are the subject they’re looking for. Notice what they never say in the video: -They never describe the suspect. -They never state a crime. -They never explain how he matches the person they are “looking for.” Just, “we’re looking for someone.” That is not enough. Then, the agent tries to grab the man’s ID without consent. The man pulls it back and says, “Don’t touch my ID.” He’s right. Officers don’t get to physically seize your property without legal authority. The agent then looks at the ID from a distance and walks away. Which tells us something important… If they truly had probable cause, this would not have ended with a casual glance and retreat. ICE does not have authority to randomly stop citizens to “verify” they’re not someone else. That is exactly the kind of policing the Constitution was written to prevent. If agents can box in your car, demand your identity without stating a crime, and fish for compliance… then everyone’s rights are conditional. And conditional rights aren’t rights at all.

Jesus Freakin Congress

77,692 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent POINTED A GUN at a U.S. citizen, through her car window, while threatening her, in Falls Church, Virginia. And the excuse? They claimed she “almost ran them over.” Except… she had a dash cam recording the entire thing. She immediately called their bullshit: “You are so full of shit. I didn’t almost run anyone over.” The agent tells her, “You aren’t funny.” She responds, “You aren’t funny.” Then he threatens her… “Keep it up, I will arrest you.” While he has his gun aimed inches away from her. She says, “I’m a legal citizen, for what?” And they keep threatening her with arrest. Then, the agent repeats the accusation that she tried to run them over. So, she tells him, “Run you over when? I have dash cam recording. That’s a lie.” And suddenly… they WALK AWAY. Because if she had actually tried to run federal agents over, why did they just leave after she called their bullshit, and said she had video proving them wrong? And just to emphasize the seriousness of what happened… An ARMED federal agent had his GUN POINTED AT A WOMAN, through her car window, while threatening her with arrest. Pointing a firearm at someone is an enormous use of force that should NEVER be treated casually… especially when the supposed justification is an accusation they apparently couldn’t… or wouldn’t… back up. She wasn’t arrested. They didn’t show her evidence that she committed a crime. They just threatened her, pointed a gun at her, and repeatedly told her they would lock her up if she continued following them. And the SECOND she says, “I have it on dash cam,” they WALK AWAY. Because apparently the threat disappears when there’s a camera that can prove what actually happened. This is exactly why people need to DOCUMENT these encounters. Because when armed federal agents can point guns at citizens, and make accusations with seemingly no consequences, the public needs cameras. And when they threaten you for asking, “For what?” keep recording.

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent POINTED A GUN at a U.S. citizen, through her car window, while threatening her, in Falls Church, Virginia. And the excuse? They claimed she “almost ran them over.” Except… she had a dash cam recording the entire thing. She immediately called their bullshit: “You are so full of shit. I didn’t almost run anyone over.” The agent tells her, “You aren’t funny.” She responds, “You aren’t funny.” Then he threatens her… “Keep it up, I will arrest you.” While he has his gun aimed inches away from her. She says, “I’m a legal citizen, for what?” And they keep threatening her with arrest. Then, the agent repeats the accusation that she tried to run them over. So, she tells him, “Run you over when? I have dash cam recording. That’s a lie.” And suddenly… they WALK AWAY. Because if she had actually tried to run federal agents over, why did they just leave after she called their bullshit, and said she had video proving them wrong? And just to emphasize the seriousness of what happened… An ARMED federal agent had his GUN POINTED AT A WOMAN, through her car window, while threatening her with arrest. Pointing a firearm at someone is an enormous use of force that should NEVER be treated casually… especially when the supposed justification is an accusation they apparently couldn’t… or wouldn’t… back up. She wasn’t arrested. They didn’t show her evidence that she committed a crime. They just threatened her, pointed a gun at her, and repeatedly told her they would lock her up if she continued following them. And the SECOND she says, “I have it on dash cam,” they WALK AWAY. Because apparently the threat disappears when there’s a camera that can prove what actually happened. This is exactly why people need to DOCUMENT these encounters. Because when armed federal agents can point guns at citizens, and make accusations with seemingly no consequences, the public needs cameras. And when they threaten you for asking, “For what?” keep recording.

Jesus Freakin Congress

2,803,675 次观看 • 14 天前

🚨ICE agents illegally threatened to tase a PASSENGER for refusing to exit a vehicle… after lying about having a warrant for him, in Lennox, California. In the video, the agents repeatedly insisted they had a warrant for the passenger, demanded he get out of the car, and threatened to tase him if he didn’t comply. But, when the passenger continued to ask to see the warrant, the agents suddenly asked for his ID. After running his identification, they decided to change the story… Agents then started asking the driver for their ID, despite admitting they did not know who they were dealing with. When questioned, one agent first claimed they had a warrant for the passenger, then admitted they were “writing it right now,” before finally acknowledging, “I thought it was you.” So, to break this all down… ICE agents threatened to tase someone over a warrant they didn’t have, for a person they hadn’t even identified. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. Government agents do not get to detain whoever they want, threaten force, demand identification from everyone present, and just figure out who they are dealing with later. Because that’s illegal. If ICE had a valid warrant, they should have been able to identify the subject of that warrant before threatening someone with a taser. And if they didn’t know who they were talking to… then what exactly was the legal basis for the detention, the threats, and the demands for identification? This is why people are outraged. And every time this behavior is excused, it sends the message that ICE agents can ignore constitutional rights, threaten innocent people, and walk away like nothing happened.

🚨ICE agents illegally threatened to tase a PASSENGER for refusing to exit a vehicle… after lying about having a warrant for him, in Lennox, California. In the video, the agents repeatedly insisted they had a warrant for the passenger, demanded he get out of the car, and threatened to tase him if he didn’t comply. But, when the passenger continued to ask to see the warrant, the agents suddenly asked for his ID. After running his identification, they decided to change the story… Agents then started asking the driver for their ID, despite admitting they did not know who they were dealing with. When questioned, one agent first claimed they had a warrant for the passenger, then admitted they were “writing it right now,” before finally acknowledging, “I thought it was you.” So, to break this all down… ICE agents threatened to tase someone over a warrant they didn’t have, for a person they hadn’t even identified. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. Government agents do not get to detain whoever they want, threaten force, demand identification from everyone present, and just figure out who they are dealing with later. Because that’s illegal. If ICE had a valid warrant, they should have been able to identify the subject of that warrant before threatening someone with a taser. And if they didn’t know who they were talking to… then what exactly was the legal basis for the detention, the threats, and the demands for identification? This is why people are outraged. And every time this behavior is excused, it sends the message that ICE agents can ignore constitutional rights, threaten innocent people, and walk away like nothing happened.

Jesus Freakin Congress

59,014 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally assaulted a 19-year-old U.S. citizen, and then kidnapped him, while admitting on camera they didn’t even know who he was, in Olathe, Kansas. In the video, an agent is sitting on the teenager’s back as his 14-year-old brother screams that he’s a U.S. citizen, in a Walmart parking lot. The agent responds: “Well, we’re going to find that out since whoever drives this [pointing to the truck] isn’t.” That sentence is the admission. Because it shows the only thing they knew, at that moment, was something about the registered owner of the truck… not the person they had pinned to the pavement. Vehicle registration tells you who owns a car. It does NOT tell you who is driving it. Before law enforcement can detain someone, they need individualized reasonable suspicion tied to that person. If they had not confirmed the driver matched the registered owner… If they had not observed a crime… If they had no warrant… Then pinning him down, handcuffing him, and loading him into a vehicle raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You don’t get to tackle someone first and figure out who they are later. You don’t get to use force based on “we’ll find out.” The issue isn’t just that he’s a U.S. citizen… The issue is whether agents had lawful, INDIVIDUALIZED suspicion to detain him before they used force. Because when law enforcement starts treating vehicle registration as automatic suspicion for whoever is behind the wheel… That’s collective punishment. And the Constitution does not allow that.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents illegally assaulted a 19-year-old U.S. citizen, and then kidnapped him, while admitting on camera they didn’t even know who he was, in Olathe, Kansas. In the video, an agent is sitting on the teenager’s back as his 14-year-old brother screams that he’s a U.S. citizen, in a Walmart parking lot. The agent responds: “Well, we’re going to find that out since whoever drives this [pointing to the truck] isn’t.” That sentence is the admission. Because it shows the only thing they knew, at that moment, was something about the registered owner of the truck… not the person they had pinned to the pavement. Vehicle registration tells you who owns a car. It does NOT tell you who is driving it. Before law enforcement can detain someone, they need individualized reasonable suspicion tied to that person. If they had not confirmed the driver matched the registered owner… If they had not observed a crime… If they had no warrant… Then pinning him down, handcuffing him, and loading him into a vehicle raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You don’t get to tackle someone first and figure out who they are later. You don’t get to use force based on “we’ll find out.” The issue isn’t just that he’s a U.S. citizen… The issue is whether agents had lawful, INDIVIDUALIZED suspicion to detain him before they used force. Because when law enforcement starts treating vehicle registration as automatic suspicion for whoever is behind the wheel… That’s collective punishment. And the Constitution does not allow that.

Jesus Freakin Congress

397,183 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Men posed as ICE agents and detained and assaulted a woman… and Tom Homan is telling everyone that they just have to comply with this. A woman was driving on Highway 211, in Oregon, when a vehicle with flashing red and blue lights pulled behind her. Believing she was being stopped by law enforcement, she pulled over. Two men approached her vehicle, one was carrying a rifle, and they claimed to be ICE agents and told her she was being detained. They pulled her out of her car, searched her, and put her in the back of their vehicle. Then, a third man… who remained inside the vehicle… assaulted her. He told her he was the “guard.” The men were wearing tactical vests labeled “POLICE,” carrying fake badges, and wore face coverings. They held her for nearly 20 minutes before telling her she was free to go… and then she drove herself to the hospital. And while she was there, she reported that she started receiving text messages from someone claiming to be a law firm offering legal representation for her detention. Federal authorities later confirmed this was NOT an official ICE operation… These were people pretending to be federal agents. And this is exactly why Tom Homan telling people to “comply” with anyone claiming to be ICE is so incredibly dangerous. Because what is a person supposed to do when someone in a tactical vest, carrying a gun, pulls them over with flashing lights and says they are federal agents? Just trust them? This is not about telling people to resist legitimate law enforcement. This is about the government normalizing a system where anyone can look like an armed federal agent, claim to have authority over you, and expect you to obey without being able to verify who they are. That doesn’t make people safer. It makes everyone more vulnerable to being kidnapped, assaulted, or killed by criminals who know they can pretend to be ICE.

🚨BREAKING: Men posed as ICE agents and detained and assaulted a woman… and Tom Homan is telling everyone that they just have to comply with this. A woman was driving on Highway 211, in Oregon, when a vehicle with flashing red and blue lights pulled behind her. Believing she was being stopped by law enforcement, she pulled over. Two men approached her vehicle, one was carrying a rifle, and they claimed to be ICE agents and told her she was being detained. They pulled her out of her car, searched her, and put her in the back of their vehicle. Then, a third man… who remained inside the vehicle… assaulted her. He told her he was the “guard.” The men were wearing tactical vests labeled “POLICE,” carrying fake badges, and wore face coverings. They held her for nearly 20 minutes before telling her she was free to go… and then she drove herself to the hospital. And while she was there, she reported that she started receiving text messages from someone claiming to be a law firm offering legal representation for her detention. Federal authorities later confirmed this was NOT an official ICE operation… These were people pretending to be federal agents. And this is exactly why Tom Homan telling people to “comply” with anyone claiming to be ICE is so incredibly dangerous. Because what is a person supposed to do when someone in a tactical vest, carrying a gun, pulls them over with flashing lights and says they are federal agents? Just trust them? This is not about telling people to resist legitimate law enforcement. This is about the government normalizing a system where anyone can look like an armed federal agent, claim to have authority over you, and expect you to obey without being able to verify who they are. That doesn’t make people safer. It makes everyone more vulnerable to being kidnapped, assaulted, or killed by criminals who know they can pretend to be ICE.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,078,929 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents showed up at a work site in Brownsville, Texas, claiming to be looking for two people… and ended up illegally handcuffing TWO U.S. CITIZENS, throwing one of them against a truck, threatening to arrest him again, and scanning everyone’s faces to determine their “status.” In the video, ICE showed up looking for two people. They asked the foreman if he knew them. He said no. Then, they asked if they could talk to the other workers about the people they were looking for. The foreman said, “If they want to talk to you, they can.” And then an ICE agent tried to scan the foreman’s face to run him through their system. The foreman told him he was not allowed to just scan his face. The foreman then walked over to one of his workers’ trucks, where ICE agents were surrounding the work vehicles at their work site. He asked what was going on. He repeatedly asked who they were looking for, and told them the people they claimed to be looking for were not there. The agent responded, “Well, we want to make sure.” The foreman told them, “Well, we aren’t them. You all need to leave.” And then an ICE agent threatened to arrest him. “You need to settle down or I have to put you in cuffs.” Except this man was not threatening them. He was not attacking them. He was not even raising his voice. He was standing there, asking questions and telling government agents to leave his workplace, after they had already expanded their investigation beyond the two people they claimed to be looking for. So, the ICE agent threw him against a truck and handcuffed him. A U.S. citizen. And after they released him, he asked for the agents’ badge numbers. And the agent responded by threatening to handcuff him AGAIN. The government cannot simply show up, invade your workplace, surround your vehicles, demand access to people who are not the subjects of their investigation, scan your face, and then arrest you because you object to what they are doing. The First Amendment protects your right to question government agents and verbally protest their actions. The Fourth Amendment protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures. And an arrest cannot simply be used as punishment because an officer does not like the fact that you are standing there, asking questions, or asserting your rights. Then the foreman saw another person ICE had in handcuffs… He told them they needed to let him go because he was not the person they were looking for. The agents eventually released the person they had in handcuffs… after scanning his face and discovering that he was also a U.S. citizen. The government is creating situations where people are expected to silently obey armed agents, who refuse to explain what they are doing… while they violate your constitutional rights… and then punishing anyone who dares to ask questions. When the government tells you that your only options are blind obedience or punishment… you are not living in a free country.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents showed up at a work site in Brownsville, Texas, claiming to be looking for two people… and ended up illegally handcuffing TWO U.S. CITIZENS, throwing one of them against a truck, threatening to arrest him again, and scanning everyone’s faces to determine their “status.” In the video, ICE showed up looking for two people. They asked the foreman if he knew them. He said no. Then, they asked if they could talk to the other workers about the people they were looking for. The foreman said, “If they want to talk to you, they can.” And then an ICE agent tried to scan the foreman’s face to run him through their system. The foreman told him he was not allowed to just scan his face. The foreman then walked over to one of his workers’ trucks, where ICE agents were surrounding the work vehicles at their work site. He asked what was going on. He repeatedly asked who they were looking for, and told them the people they claimed to be looking for were not there. The agent responded, “Well, we want to make sure.” The foreman told them, “Well, we aren’t them. You all need to leave.” And then an ICE agent threatened to arrest him. “You need to settle down or I have to put you in cuffs.” Except this man was not threatening them. He was not attacking them. He was not even raising his voice. He was standing there, asking questions and telling government agents to leave his workplace, after they had already expanded their investigation beyond the two people they claimed to be looking for. So, the ICE agent threw him against a truck and handcuffed him. A U.S. citizen. And after they released him, he asked for the agents’ badge numbers. And the agent responded by threatening to handcuff him AGAIN. The government cannot simply show up, invade your workplace, surround your vehicles, demand access to people who are not the subjects of their investigation, scan your face, and then arrest you because you object to what they are doing. The First Amendment protects your right to question government agents and verbally protest their actions. The Fourth Amendment protects you from unreasonable searches and seizures. And an arrest cannot simply be used as punishment because an officer does not like the fact that you are standing there, asking questions, or asserting your rights. Then the foreman saw another person ICE had in handcuffs… He told them they needed to let him go because he was not the person they were looking for. The agents eventually released the person they had in handcuffs… after scanning his face and discovering that he was also a U.S. citizen. The government is creating situations where people are expected to silently obey armed agents, who refuse to explain what they are doing… while they violate your constitutional rights… and then punishing anyone who dares to ask questions. When the government tells you that your only options are blind obedience or punishment… you are not living in a free country.

Jesus Freakin Congress

776,237 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents followed STUDENTS to their home… boxed them in… and then tried to call it a “consensual encounter,” in Shakopee, Minnesota. In the video, the students pulled into a parking spot at their home. Multiple ICE vehicles pulled up behind them and blocked them in. Then, agents approached and demanded ID. When a neighbor started filming and asked why they were following the students, the agent claimed this was a “consensual encounter”… and said the driver had “stopped for them.” Except she parked her car and they pulled up behind her… And that distinction matters legally. A consensual encounter only exists if a reasonable person would feel free to leave. You are not free to leave when multiple government vehicles pull in behind you and block your car. That is a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. And a seizure requires reasonable suspicion of a crime. When asked the reason for the stop, the agent said they were “stopped in the middle of the road.” …They were in a parking spot. Then, the agent tells the driver, “I think we stopped and talked to you the other day.” So, this is the SECOND time they’ve illegally targeted and followed a CHILD. And let’s be honest about the power dynamic here… When agents surround your vehicle, when they have a documented pattern of escalating encounters, when people across the country have been dragged out of cars, tackled, tased, or shot at during these so-called “stops,” no reasonable person believes they can just drive away without consequences. Consent under threat of force is not consent. If ICE wants to detain someone, they need lawful grounds, they need articulable suspicion. They do not get to follow students home, block them in, and retroactively call it “consensual” because someone asked questions on camera. This is how constitutional erosion happens. If federal agents can redefine “parking” as “stopping for them,” and redefine “blocked in” as “free to leave,” then the Fourth Amendment becomes whatever they say it is in the moment. And that should alarm everyone.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents followed STUDENTS to their home… boxed them in… and then tried to call it a “consensual encounter,” in Shakopee, Minnesota. In the video, the students pulled into a parking spot at their home. Multiple ICE vehicles pulled up behind them and blocked them in. Then, agents approached and demanded ID. When a neighbor started filming and asked why they were following the students, the agent claimed this was a “consensual encounter”… and said the driver had “stopped for them.” Except she parked her car and they pulled up behind her… And that distinction matters legally. A consensual encounter only exists if a reasonable person would feel free to leave. You are not free to leave when multiple government vehicles pull in behind you and block your car. That is a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. And a seizure requires reasonable suspicion of a crime. When asked the reason for the stop, the agent said they were “stopped in the middle of the road.” …They were in a parking spot. Then, the agent tells the driver, “I think we stopped and talked to you the other day.” So, this is the SECOND time they’ve illegally targeted and followed a CHILD. And let’s be honest about the power dynamic here… When agents surround your vehicle, when they have a documented pattern of escalating encounters, when people across the country have been dragged out of cars, tackled, tased, or shot at during these so-called “stops,” no reasonable person believes they can just drive away without consequences. Consent under threat of force is not consent. If ICE wants to detain someone, they need lawful grounds, they need articulable suspicion. They do not get to follow students home, block them in, and retroactively call it “consensual” because someone asked questions on camera. This is how constitutional erosion happens. If federal agents can redefine “parking” as “stopping for them,” and redefine “blocked in” as “free to leave,” then the Fourth Amendment becomes whatever they say it is in the moment. And that should alarm everyone.

Jesus Freakin Congress

389,368 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents blocked in a U.S. citizen’s car… and then threatened to arrest her for not moving. In the video, a U.S. citizen was sitting in a public parking lot when ICE agents pulled up directly in front of her car, and blocked her from leaving. Then, they accused HER of “impeding” them. She told them she literally couldn’t move because THEY had blocked her in. The agent said they would back up… and if she didn’t move, “that’s your chance.” Her response… “My chance for what?” The agent then cited “18 USC 111,” a federal law that makes it a crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with certain federal officers while they are performing their official duties. But, the law is not a magic phrase that allows federal agents to arrest anyone who annoys them. The statute includes a forcible-act requirement. Sitting in a public parking lot is not “impeding” a federal officer. So, she asks… “How am I impeding you when you just pulled up in front of my car?” The agent then yelled: “Move your car or it’s over!” She told him they couldn’t move. He started yelling, “Back up, or you are under arrest. We aren’t playing anymore.” She responded… “Well, you can’t arrest me.” While she backed up. The agent gets mad and… while walking next to her car as she was backing up… replied, “Yes I can. Try me.” This is an absolutely insane abuse of power. The government cannot create the circumstances that make it impossible for you to leave, accuse you of “impeding” them, because you cannot leave, and then threaten to arrest you for not doing the impossible. Because that is coercion, and it’s illegal. And the most terrifying part is… this is how ICE agents are trained to operate. They create confusing, threatening situations where people don’t even know if they are being lawfully detained, if they are free to leave, or if they are about to be arrested for simply existing in the wrong place. And then the government expects people to calmly trust that everything they are doing is legal. Which is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because “I’m a federal agent” is not a magic phrase that makes your constitutional rights disappear.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents blocked in a U.S. citizen’s car… and then threatened to arrest her for not moving. In the video, a U.S. citizen was sitting in a public parking lot when ICE agents pulled up directly in front of her car, and blocked her from leaving. Then, they accused HER of “impeding” them. She told them she literally couldn’t move because THEY had blocked her in. The agent said they would back up… and if she didn’t move, “that’s your chance.” Her response… “My chance for what?” The agent then cited “18 USC 111,” a federal law that makes it a crime to forcibly assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with certain federal officers while they are performing their official duties. But, the law is not a magic phrase that allows federal agents to arrest anyone who annoys them. The statute includes a forcible-act requirement. Sitting in a public parking lot is not “impeding” a federal officer. So, she asks… “How am I impeding you when you just pulled up in front of my car?” The agent then yelled: “Move your car or it’s over!” She told him they couldn’t move. He started yelling, “Back up, or you are under arrest. We aren’t playing anymore.” She responded… “Well, you can’t arrest me.” While she backed up. The agent gets mad and… while walking next to her car as she was backing up… replied, “Yes I can. Try me.” This is an absolutely insane abuse of power. The government cannot create the circumstances that make it impossible for you to leave, accuse you of “impeding” them, because you cannot leave, and then threaten to arrest you for not doing the impossible. Because that is coercion, and it’s illegal. And the most terrifying part is… this is how ICE agents are trained to operate. They create confusing, threatening situations where people don’t even know if they are being lawfully detained, if they are free to leave, or if they are about to be arrested for simply existing in the wrong place. And then the government expects people to calmly trust that everything they are doing is legal. Which is exactly why constitutional protections exist. Because “I’m a federal agent” is not a magic phrase that makes your constitutional rights disappear.

Jesus Freakin Congress

276,129 次观看 • 1 个月前

Police Broke Down Door in Mistaken Identity Case in Baton Rouge Officers asked for Brooks’ name. He refused to answer and asked them to get off his property. The video shows officers following him, kicking open his door, and detaining him. Shortly after, the officers put Brooks in handcuffs. He said he then told officers his name, and that is when they realized they had the wrong person. “What took place was, you were mistaken for someone else. We got a call that said the person that we were looking for was at this house, and when they pulled up, you looked just like that person,” another officer said.

Police Broke Down Door in Mistaken Identity Case in Baton Rouge Officers asked for Brooks’ name. He refused to answer and asked them to get off his property. The video shows officers following him, kicking open his door, and detaining him. Shortly after, the officers put Brooks in handcuffs. He said he then told officers his name, and that is when they realized they had the wrong person. “What took place was, you were mistaken for someone else. We got a call that said the person that we were looking for was at this house, and when they pulled up, you looked just like that person,” another officer said.

American Crime Stories

15,630 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents violently pulled a U.S. citizen PASSENGER from a vehicle, slamming him to the ground… Then shouted that he had a gun, even though he didn’t. In Tucson, Arizona, state troopers pulled over a vehicle. While they were stopped on the side of the road, the state trooper called Border Patrol because the PASSENGER appeared to be Hispanic. When Border Patrol arrived, the situation immediately escalated to agents smashed both passenger-side windows. One agent tried to hit the phone out of the driver’s hand, who was recording, as they violently ripped the backseat passenger out of the vehicle, and threw him onto the ground, while multiple agents pin him down. Then, an agent ordered the driver out of the vehicle. She responded, “I didn’t do anything.” The agent replied, “Step out or you are going to get tackled.” At that point, at least three agents already had the passenger pinned, with his hands behind his back, when another agent suddenly yelled, “Gun!” A fourth agent responded, “He has a gun?” The driver immediately yells back, “NO! He has NO gun. WE HAVE NO WEAPONS!” The agent, closest to the car, was startled by this, appearing to forget the driver was still inside… and filming. That’s when he reached into the vehicle, grabbed her phone, threw it from her hand, and attempted to pull her out of the car. There is a lot going on in this video, so let’s break this down… First… you don’t get to detain people based on how they look. The Fourth Amendment requires individualized, reasonable suspicion. Not “he looked Hispanic.” Second… a passenger, during a traffic stop, is not automatically required to identify themselves, or hand over ID. Law enforcement needs a lawful basis… like reasonable suspicion that that specific person committed a crime… to demand identification. Third… even when someone is lawfully detained, they are only required to comply with lawful orders tied to THAT detention. A passenger doesn’t lose constitutional protections just because someone else was pulled over, while driving. Fourth… the First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement, in public, while they’re doing their job. Knocking a phone away, or throwing it because someone is filming, is violating that constitutional right. And finally, any use of force… breaking windows, pulling someone out of a car, and restraining them… has to be objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. That requires specific, articulable facts, not assumptions about identity. This wasn’t a checkpoint. It wasn’t a border stop. This was a traffic stop where a PASSENGER became the target because of how he looked. And if that’s enough to trigger federal agents breaking windows, and violently pulling U.S. citizens out of cars… then every single person should be demanding answers, and accountability. Because this could’ve ended with another U.S. citizen dead… And next time, that U.S. citizen could be you.

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents violently pulled a U.S. citizen PASSENGER from a vehicle, slamming him to the ground… Then shouted that he had a gun, even though he didn’t. In Tucson, Arizona, state troopers pulled over a vehicle. While they were stopped on the side of the road, the state trooper called Border Patrol because the PASSENGER appeared to be Hispanic. When Border Patrol arrived, the situation immediately escalated to agents smashed both passenger-side windows. One agent tried to hit the phone out of the driver’s hand, who was recording, as they violently ripped the backseat passenger out of the vehicle, and threw him onto the ground, while multiple agents pin him down. Then, an agent ordered the driver out of the vehicle. She responded, “I didn’t do anything.” The agent replied, “Step out or you are going to get tackled.” At that point, at least three agents already had the passenger pinned, with his hands behind his back, when another agent suddenly yelled, “Gun!” A fourth agent responded, “He has a gun?” The driver immediately yells back, “NO! He has NO gun. WE HAVE NO WEAPONS!” The agent, closest to the car, was startled by this, appearing to forget the driver was still inside… and filming. That’s when he reached into the vehicle, grabbed her phone, threw it from her hand, and attempted to pull her out of the car. There is a lot going on in this video, so let’s break this down… First… you don’t get to detain people based on how they look. The Fourth Amendment requires individualized, reasonable suspicion. Not “he looked Hispanic.” Second… a passenger, during a traffic stop, is not automatically required to identify themselves, or hand over ID. Law enforcement needs a lawful basis… like reasonable suspicion that that specific person committed a crime… to demand identification. Third… even when someone is lawfully detained, they are only required to comply with lawful orders tied to THAT detention. A passenger doesn’t lose constitutional protections just because someone else was pulled over, while driving. Fourth… the First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement, in public, while they’re doing their job. Knocking a phone away, or throwing it because someone is filming, is violating that constitutional right. And finally, any use of force… breaking windows, pulling someone out of a car, and restraining them… has to be objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. That requires specific, articulable facts, not assumptions about identity. This wasn’t a checkpoint. It wasn’t a border stop. This was a traffic stop where a PASSENGER became the target because of how he looked. And if that’s enough to trigger federal agents breaking windows, and violently pulling U.S. citizens out of cars… then every single person should be demanding answers, and accountability. Because this could’ve ended with another U.S. citizen dead… And next time, that U.S. citizen could be you.

Jesus Freakin Congress

227,735 次观看 • 1 个月前

This woman was visiting Japan, while there she stayed in what she thought was a reputable hotel. When she got back to her room from sight seeing, she laid on her bad and noticed a strange smell. She looked around and couldn’t see anything then she looked under the bed and saw the eyes of a man. She screamed loudly and then he screamed and ran out. The hotel employees immediately came up to the room and called the police. She asked the hotel workers how something like this happened. Their response to her was suspicious and chilling, they said that the police will never find him because they don’t have cameras. She checked out and demanded a refund, they offered her $178 in hotel credit coupons. They eventually refunded her $600 but still didn’t do a report because they claim they need to clarify the details of what happened. Based on how uncooperative they were and how they were refusing to acknowledge and accept responsibility, is it entirely possible it was a hotel worker and they are covering for them, why else would a hotel chain not have security cameras?

This woman was visiting Japan, while there she stayed in what she thought was a reputable hotel. When she got back to her room from sight seeing, she laid on her bad and noticed a strange smell. She looked around and couldn’t see anything then she looked under the bed and saw the eyes of a man. She screamed loudly and then he screamed and ran out. The hotel employees immediately came up to the room and called the police. She asked the hotel workers how something like this happened. Their response to her was suspicious and chilling, they said that the police will never find him because they don’t have cameras. She checked out and demanded a refund, they offered her $178 in hotel credit coupons. They eventually refunded her $600 but still didn’t do a report because they claim they need to clarify the details of what happened. Based on how uncooperative they were and how they were refusing to acknowledge and accept responsibility, is it entirely possible it was a hotel worker and they are covering for them, why else would a hotel chain not have security cameras?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

440,407 次观看 • 6 个月前

A couple was pulled over by immigration agents in Minneapolis, Minnesota. When an agent ordered the woman out of the vehicle, she stated that they were U.S. citizens. When asked why they ran, she responded, “You are scary people,” but then said they did not run. After a brief exchange, the agents physically removed both individuals from the vehicle. tt: nota.sandi

A couple was pulled over by immigration agents in Minneapolis, Minnesota. When an agent ordered the woman out of the vehicle, she stated that they were U.S. citizens. When asked why they ran, she responded, “You are scary people,” but then said they did not run. After a brief exchange, the agents physically removed both individuals from the vehicle. tt: nota.sandi

ICE of TikTok

69,467 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 This is horrifying… In the Chicago suburbs, ICE/Border Patrol illegally stopped and boxed in a woman at night, masked and armed, surrounding her car with no reason at all. She asked calmly, “Why am I being detained?” The agent refused to answer and instead demanded her ID, insisting, “You need a license to operate a vehicle… do you have ID?” She offered to hand over her ID once they explained why she was being stopped. They refused. She even suggested they run her license plates… they’re under her name… to verify who she is. Still, they ignored her and continued pressuring her. Then one agent said, “She’s a time waster. Get the fuck… get rid of her.” Imagine being a young woman, alone in your car, surrounded by masked men, hearing that. The fear, intimidation, and abuse of power were real… and completely unjustified. This was not policing. It was harassment, racial profiling, and blatant abuse of authority. No probable cause. No legal justification. Just a terrifying show of force. Film ICE whenever you see them. Protect yourself.

🚨 This is horrifying… In the Chicago suburbs, ICE/Border Patrol illegally stopped and boxed in a woman at night, masked and armed, surrounding her car with no reason at all. She asked calmly, “Why am I being detained?” The agent refused to answer and instead demanded her ID, insisting, “You need a license to operate a vehicle… do you have ID?” She offered to hand over her ID once they explained why she was being stopped. They refused. She even suggested they run her license plates… they’re under her name… to verify who she is. Still, they ignored her and continued pressuring her. Then one agent said, “She’s a time waster. Get the fuck… get rid of her.” Imagine being a young woman, alone in your car, surrounded by masked men, hearing that. The fear, intimidation, and abuse of power were real… and completely unjustified. This was not policing. It was harassment, racial profiling, and blatant abuse of authority. No probable cause. No legal justification. Just a terrifying show of force. Film ICE whenever you see them. Protect yourself.

Jesus Freakin Congress

426,606 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨ICE threatened to arrest a woman for obstruction… because she dared to stand on her own property and ask for a warrant in St. Paul, Minnesota. In the video, you can see ICE/Border Patrol agents terrorizing a residential neighborhood. A woman calmly asks to see a warrant as they invade her yard… which is her absolute right. Instead of producing one, they snap back that she is “obstructing” and threaten to arrest her… on her own lawn. They had no warrant. They had no right to be on her property. But they had no problem trying to intimidate a resident into silence. This is what unchecked federal power looks like… and it’s happening in broad daylight.

🚨ICE threatened to arrest a woman for obstruction… because she dared to stand on her own property and ask for a warrant in St. Paul, Minnesota. In the video, you can see ICE/Border Patrol agents terrorizing a residential neighborhood. A woman calmly asks to see a warrant as they invade her yard… which is her absolute right. Instead of producing one, they snap back that she is “obstructing” and threaten to arrest her… on her own lawn. They had no warrant. They had no right to be on her property. But they had no problem trying to intimidate a resident into silence. This is what unchecked federal power looks like… and it’s happening in broad daylight.

Jesus Freakin Congress

83,396 次观看 • 9 个月前

ICE lies about their identity to violently detain mother—even though she carries green card at all times. "You lied to me when you said you were police!" she yells. "Who are you? Why pull me over?" "They put their knees on top of me, like three or four, and pulled me so hard." Agents eventually released Juanita Avila after admitting that they had no warrant for her arrest—and that she was in U.S. with a legal green card. But only because her daughter arrived on the scene to insist they check her pockets for paperwork. "Why were they hurting me, dragging me out of the car? Couldn’t they verify that I'm legal first, before doing that?" The incident occurred in Cottage Grove, Oregon. #DemsUnited

ICE lies about their identity to violently detain mother—even though she carries green card at all times. "You lied to me when you said you were police!" she yells. "Who are you? Why pull me over?" "They put their knees on top of me, like three or four, and pulled me so hard." Agents eventually released Juanita Avila after admitting that they had no warrant for her arrest—and that she was in U.S. with a legal green card. But only because her daughter arrived on the scene to insist they check her pockets for paperwork. "Why were they hurting me, dragging me out of the car? Couldn’t they verify that I'm legal first, before doing that?" The incident occurred in Cottage Grove, Oregon. #DemsUnited

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

26,715 次观看 • 9 个月前

JUST IN: Witness to the Minneapolis shooting tells CNN that an "ICE convoy" was stuck in the road and the woman who was shot blocked traffic so "they couldn't progress." The witness blasted ICE, calling them "children." "I heard whistles, which is a common sign that ICE is nearby." "But there was an ICE convoy that seemed to be stuck. And then there was a protester who was blocking traffic, so they couldn't progress. And, she was totally peaceful." "They were screaming at her to move, move, move. And then they approached her vehicle aggressively and tried to open her door." "And then that's when she got spooked, and she reversed her vehicle."

JUST IN: Witness to the Minneapolis shooting tells CNN that an "ICE convoy" was stuck in the road and the woman who was shot blocked traffic so "they couldn't progress." The witness blasted ICE, calling them "children." "I heard whistles, which is a common sign that ICE is nearby." "But there was an ICE convoy that seemed to be stuck. And then there was a protester who was blocking traffic, so they couldn't progress. And, she was totally peaceful." "They were screaming at her to move, move, move. And then they approached her vehicle aggressively and tried to open her door." "And then that's when she got spooked, and she reversed her vehicle."

Collin Rugg

2,004,057 次观看 • 7 个月前

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

This woman walked into this ice cream shop and ordered an ice cream cone. When they handed it to her she told them she couldn’t pay for it. 😳 The employees said she had to pay for it. She didn’t have any money. She asks them if they are going to call the cops. This male customer sitting there chimes in and says if they call the cops he will be a witness. The woman said she told them she wanted it for free but the man said that’s not true. He said he watched her the whole time. She tries to put it down on the countertop but the employee tells her don’t leave it there. So she walks over and throws it in the trash. The witness tells her “this is what entitlement looks like” as she walks out the door. Some people said why not just buy the ice cream for her, to have a heart, because you never know what someone is going through. Others said if she had asked the right way and told them up front she didn’t have any money then maybe they would have purchased it for her but to come in and order and THEN tell them you don’t have any money is just wrong. This wasn’t a steak or a burger or a meal, I could see buying her those things to help someone out that is hungry but an ice cream is not a necessity. No one owes anyone anything. What do you think? Should one of them have bought the ice cream for her, given it to her for free? Or do you think she was trying to get something for free and trying to take advantage of them?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,233,356 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Tom Homan says if you don’t want to be killed by ICE agents, you should just comply…. So here is an example of what he wants you to comply with. In this video, a woman noticed vehicles in a parking lot that she believed could be ICE vehicles… So, she started filming. The people noticed she was filming, and drove past her. She was alone, so she decided to leave. Then, they started followed her. But here’s the thing… she wasn’t even 100% sure they were ICE agents. They were in unmarked vehicles, and they weren’t using emergency lights. As she was driving down the street, being followed by these unmarked cars, one of the vehicles pulls up beside her, cuts her off, and the cars box her in. She had nowhere to go without hitting the curb, or hitting the vehicle that had just cut her off. She honked, but the vehicle just sat there. Eventually it moved, and the vehicles drove away. Now, imagine being a woman, alone in your car. A group of cars, you cannot clearly identify as law enforcement, start following you. They don’t turn on emergency lights. They don’t clearly identify themselves. And one of them cuts you off and blocking your vehicle from being able to drive away. What are you supposed to think is happening? Because from your perspective, it looks like you are being kidnapped by random people. And that is the terrifying part of what ICE is doing. They are creating situations where people have no idea whether the people surrounding them are legitimate law enforcement officers, or strangers attempting to abduct, or rob them. And Tom Homan’s answer to being kidnapped, or robbed, is… “Just comply.” Don’t try to drive away. Don’t defend yourself. Don’t try to escape. Just calmly allow unidentified people, in unmarked vehicles, to follow you, box you in, and potentially kidnap or rob you… Because if they happen to be ICE agents, and you react like a normal person who believes they are being kidnapped, you could be assaulted, detained, or even shot. Do you understand how dangerous and insane that is?!? “Just comply” means women are being told to surrender to potential kidnappers, and hope they turn out to be government agents. And if they don’t? Tom Homan says it’s their fault for not complying.

🚨BREAKING: Tom Homan says if you don’t want to be killed by ICE agents, you should just comply…. So here is an example of what he wants you to comply with. In this video, a woman noticed vehicles in a parking lot that she believed could be ICE vehicles… So, she started filming. The people noticed she was filming, and drove past her. She was alone, so she decided to leave. Then, they started followed her. But here’s the thing… she wasn’t even 100% sure they were ICE agents. They were in unmarked vehicles, and they weren’t using emergency lights. As she was driving down the street, being followed by these unmarked cars, one of the vehicles pulls up beside her, cuts her off, and the cars box her in. She had nowhere to go without hitting the curb, or hitting the vehicle that had just cut her off. She honked, but the vehicle just sat there. Eventually it moved, and the vehicles drove away. Now, imagine being a woman, alone in your car. A group of cars, you cannot clearly identify as law enforcement, start following you. They don’t turn on emergency lights. They don’t clearly identify themselves. And one of them cuts you off and blocking your vehicle from being able to drive away. What are you supposed to think is happening? Because from your perspective, it looks like you are being kidnapped by random people. And that is the terrifying part of what ICE is doing. They are creating situations where people have no idea whether the people surrounding them are legitimate law enforcement officers, or strangers attempting to abduct, or rob them. And Tom Homan’s answer to being kidnapped, or robbed, is… “Just comply.” Don’t try to drive away. Don’t defend yourself. Don’t try to escape. Just calmly allow unidentified people, in unmarked vehicles, to follow you, box you in, and potentially kidnap or rob you… Because if they happen to be ICE agents, and you react like a normal person who believes they are being kidnapped, you could be assaulted, detained, or even shot. Do you understand how dangerous and insane that is?!? “Just comply” means women are being told to surrender to potential kidnappers, and hope they turn out to be government agents. And if they don’t? Tom Homan says it’s their fault for not complying.

Jesus Freakin Congress

497,271 次观看 • 1 个月前