Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Chai Discovery's BioAI Phase Shift: Chai-3, Photoshop for Molecules, One-Shot Drug Design, & Engineering Biology Chai Discovery cofounder Matt McPartlon and product lead Neil Patil explain why AI drug design has crossed the threshold from impressive demos to pharma-trusted tools, how Chai-2 and Chai-3 are pushing toward one-shot therapeutic-grade...

20,438 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Today, we expand zero-shot drug design beyond binding to the design of multifunctional medicines, the intracellular proteome, and state-of-the-art atomic precision with our model, JAM-2. In a new report (below), we show: 1. The first drug-grade, fully computationally designed multispecific antibodies against five peptide-MHCs: Routine picomolar T-cell activation/cell-killing EC50s, >100-fold selectivity, and drug-like developability 2. The first fully generatively designed, drug-grade dual-variant KRAS G12 multispecifics: They recruit primary T-cells from human donors to kill G12V and G12C presenting cells at pM to single-digit-nM potency, completely sparing wild-type. 3. Atomic accuracy, from sequence alone: Angstrom-level agreement between Cryo-EM and JAM-2 de novo designs, requiring only target sequences (not structure) as input. 4. Unrivaled speed with an AI-native in-house wet lab: Designed, built, and tested five programs in one parallelized campaign, end-to-end in-house in ~6 weeks. 5. A higher validation bar for AI-generated drug candidates: In a field increasingly rife with hype and uneven standards of proof, we provide the highest quality public wet-lab validation of AI-designed antibodies to date. We share experimental methods in full, and invite folks to adopt and build on these standards. Truly individualized therapies will be the most important contribution of AI in drug design. These advances help accelerate this future.

Nabla Bio

179,567 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is WILD! Nvidia just launched something that could compress the most expensive process in medicine from 12 years to 12 months. BioNeMo Agent Toolkit is an open, agent-ready platform that turns AI agents into autonomous scientific workers, giving them the ability to run real drug discovery workflows instead of just generating ideas. And more than 50 companies are already using it, including Anthropic, OpenAI, Eli Lilly, Databricks, Snowflake, Dassault Systèmes and Schrödinger. Here is what it actually does. Traditional drug discovery costs an average of $2.6 billion per drug and takes over a decade. Most of that time and money goes into screening millions of compounds, designing proteins that bind to disease targets and running countless lab experiments to validate whether something works. BioNeMo agents now do all of that computationally before a single lab experiment begins. The demo Nvidia shared makes the speed impossible to ignore. An agent was asked to design 10 protein binders for PD-L1, a critical cancer immunotherapy target and it completed the full design, co-folding, scoring, and 3D structural analysis on GPU in under 90 seconds. What used to require weeks of wet lab work and PhD-level expertise now runs as a callable tool inside an AI workflow. The four core capabilities are virtual drug screening, protein binder design, genomic analysis, and medical imaging each one compressing tasks that previously took weeks into minutes. The institutional validation behind this is unusually strong. Nvidia and Eli Lilly announced a joint investment of up to $1 billion over five years to build a co-innovation lab running entirely on BioNeMo. The University of Washington's Institute for Protein Design is already running RosettaFold3 at 2x faster performance than the prior generation. And the market this unlocks is enormous, and Nvidia is sitting right at the center of it. The AI drug discovery market is projected to grow from $2.9 billion in 2026 to $13.8 billion by 2033 and McKinsey estimates generative AI could deliver $60 to $110 billion in annual economic value to pharma. Bullish on drug discovery!

Milk Road AI

23,215 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Jensen Huang just called the exact top of the pharmaceutical industry. Not a pivot. Not a disruption. An extinction event. Huang: “Where do I think the next amazing revolution is going to come? And this is going to be flat out one of the biggest ones ever. There’s no question that digital biology is going to be it.” The medical establishment has spent centuries playing a chaotic game of trial and error. We’re about to mathematically engineer the human operating system. Huang: “For the very first time in human history, biology has the opportunity to be engineering, not science. When something becomes engineering, not science, it becomes less sporadic and exponentially improving.” Biology is no longer the dark art of random discovery. It’s a predictable, compounding execution loop. Translate the chaotic variables of chemistry into the laws of computer science and you stop waiting for accidental breakthroughs. You simply compute the cure. That line should terrify every pharmaceutical executive alive. Huang: “It can compound on the benefits of the previous years. And every researcher’s contributions compound on each other.” For decades, drug discovery has been an isolated, artisanal process. One lab. One team. One molecule. Years of blind iteration. The algorithm just shattered that entire bottleneck. Every failed protein fold, every successful synthetic molecule instantly trains the foundational model. Makes the next iteration mathematically smarter. Huang: “We’re going to have incredible tools that bring the world of biology, which is very chaotic and constantly changing and diverse and complex, into the world of computer science. And that is going to be profound.” Incumbent pharma looks at the human body and sees an unmanageable wall of variables. Engineers look at that exact same body and see raw data waiting to be compiled. No longer guessing how a molecule will react in the physical world. Running millions of zero-cost simulated iterations before a single test tube is ever touched. Rip the chaotic friction out of the physical lab and drop it directly into a massive GPU cluster? The timeline to map, edit, and optimize the biological machine doesn’t shrink. It collapses.

Dustin

780,611 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

NEW episode! Drug development has never been more expensive, in terms of output per dollar spent. This trend, called Eroom’s law, is surprising, considering the incredible technological advances in drug discovery, from genome sequencing to engineering to microscopy. On a new episode of the Works in Progress podcast, Ben Southwood and I talk to Ruxandra Teslo 🧬 about why this has happened and what can be done about it. We discuss how: • AI isn’t a magic bullet for drug discovery. Predictive models lack the physical human data, like individual variation and rare side effects, that can only be generated by actually running real-world clinical trials. • As scientists invent more effective drugs, it becomes harder to discover new treatments that can surpass past successes. This is known as the "Better than the Beatles" problem. • Biotech companies are increasingly moving their "first-in-human" trials to Australia because its simpler regulations allow researchers to test drug safety faster and cheaper than in the US. • Clinical trials can be made more efficient with various reforms including: embracing platform trials, allowing researchers to select from independent ethics boards, expanding the funding and validation of surrogate endpoints, increasing transparency by releasing regulatory correspondence from failed companies, and much more. Timestamps: 00:00:00 Eroom’s law and the paradox of drug development 00:08:03 How clinical trials actually work 00:10:23 The power and controversy of surrogate endpoints 00:14:01 How historical patent laws influenced trial timelines 00:22:46 The Australia advantage and regulatory drag 00:29:08 Institutional review boards (IRBs) and bureaucratic drag 00:32:21 Open science and successful reforms 00:41:49 Our wishlist for clinical trial reforms, and which reforms we *don’t* like 00:53:48 Why AI isn’t a magic bullet for drug discovery

Saloni

109,256 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

How can generative AI and Robotics help advance drug discovery? 🚀 Excited to introduce LUMI-lab! A foundation model-driven Self-Driving Lab (SDL) for autonomous ionizable lipid discovery in mRNA delivery 🤖🔍 🔬 What is LUMI-lab? LUMI-lab integrates molecular foundation models with autonomous robotic experiments to efficiently explore new LNPs (lipid nanoparticles, mRNA delivery vehicles) with minimal wet-lab data. 🔥 Key Highlights: - 🧠 Foundation model trained on 28M molecules using a three-step strategy: - Unsupervised pretraining to capture broad molecular knowledge - Continual pretraining to specialize in lipid-like molecules - Active learning fine-tuning within a closed-loop experimental system - 🤖 1,700+ new LNPs synthesized & tested across 10 iterative cycles - 🧪 Brominated lipids autonomously identified as a novel structural feature that enhances mRNA transfection—an insight previously unrecognized in LNP design - 🏆 20.3% in vivo CRISPR gene editing efficiency in lung epithelial cells—the highest reported for inhaled LNPs 🚀 Why it matters? LNPs are the backbone of mRNA therapeutics, yet discovery has been slow due to data scarcity. LUMI-lab shows that AI-powered autonomous labs can accelerate mRNA delivery innovation🚀💡 🌐 Beyond mRNA drugs, LUMI-lab exemplifies a scalable framework for AI-driven molecular discovery, pushing boundaries in material science & drug delivery. 📜 Read the preprint: 🔗 💻 Code available on GitHub: 🔗 #AI #DrugDiscovery #mRNA #LNP #SyntheticBiology 🙏 A huge team effort behind this work, with special appreciation to Bowen LI for driving the project. Kudos to Haotian Cui, @YueXu1995, Kuan Pang, Gen Li, and Bettycat567!

Bo Wang

27,626 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Super proud and excited to finally present LiteMol-1. This is our first foundation model from LiteFold, pre-trained from scratch. Today, LiteMol-1 can generate small molecules, peptides, cyclic peptides, depsipeptides, peptides with ncAAs, macrocycles, and PROTACs. Across our peptide and small-molecule evaluations, the model shows competitive results. In several settings, we are on-par with or better than frontier structure-based models, at a fraction of the generation cost. But the part I find most interesting is that this is a model for agents. We have seen ourselves how much compute, and how many tokens it can take to generate good binders using frontier structure-based models. Sometimes you need to generate tens of thousands of designs just to get a handful worth taking forward. Now put this inside an AutoResearch loop. The agent has to continuously parse structures, inspect PDB/CIF files, compare candidates, run evaluations, modify the design, and repeat the whole thing again. It becomes extremely expensive very quickly. Sequence space gives us a very different interface. LLMs are much more efficient at inspecting and manipulating compact molecular representations like SMILES than repeatedly operating over full structural files. So LiteMol-1 becomes something like an infinite molecular canvas for the agent. For a given target and objective, the model can continuously propose what a biomolecule could look like. The agent can inspect those generations, take inspiration from them, preserve certain regions, edit others, optimize them, score them, and generate again. Generate → inspect → evaluate → edit → generate again. There is another problem I care a lot about. Most molecule design models today are heavily optimized around binding. But binding is only one part of whether something eventually becomes a therapeutic. What about ADME? Toxicity? Selectivity? Solubility? Membrane permeability? Synthesizability? For this, we also built a Monte Carlo Tree Search-based multi-objective generation framework around LiteMol-1. Instead of combining everything into one score, the search keeps multiple strong candidates, each balancing the desired properties in a different way. As our scoring functions and verifiers get better, the generation system gets better too. We can start steering molecules not just toward “binds well”, but toward a broader therapeutic design specification. The bottleneck slowly moves from simply generating molecules to having sufficiently good verifiers and scoring functions to tell us what is actually worth generating. Check out our technical research blog post for all the details. At LiteFold, our research is focused on engineering biomolecules and building systems that can carefully forecast their pre-clinical success. To stay updated on our research, follow LiteFold. Cheers!

Anindyadeep

51,436 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen