Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇺🇦🇷🇺 "CROSSING PUTIN'S RED LINES WILL LIKELY LEAD TO NUCLEAR WAR" Political scientist Alexander Rahr said the Western media has gotten too comfortable with discounting Putin's repeated warnings about red lines being crossed. He argued that attempts by NATO to cross the red lines of Russia's territorial disputes could...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

2,714,668 subscribers

17,939 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsHealth & WellnessScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,996,786 views • 2 years ago

🚨If that Doesn't Work, They Will Use NUCLEAR WEAPONS 🚨John Mearsheimer: Russia's RED LINES Have Been CROSSED 🚨There is lots of evidence that the Russians are preparing themselves to strike military targets in Europe with conventional weapons, and if that doesn't work, they will use nuclear weapons. Now, Putin of course has not said this, but Sergei Karaganov has famously made this argument in the West. And if you read the Russian media carefully, there are all sorts of people inside of Russia whoagree with Karaganov, (90%)that it's time for the Russians to take off the gloves. Look, the perspective from Moscow goes, it's the West plus Ukraine that is responsible for these attacks on the Russian homeland. It's not just Ukraine. Ukraine could not do this by itself. It's the West, and that includes President Trump. Indeed, The Kyiv Independent, a major newspaper inside of Kyiv, just had a big story that said that President Trump has basically sanctioned this, bombing campaign that Ukraine is engaged in. And in fact, The Kyiv Independent was saying it's not just the Europeans plus the Ukrainians against the Russians, it's the Ukrainians, the Europeans, and the Americans against the Russians. President Trump is back on the side of the Ukrainians.
4:33

🚨If that Doesn't Work, They Will Use NUCLEAR WEAPONS 🚨John Mearsheimer: Russia's RED LINES Have Been CROSSED 🚨There is lots of evidence that the Russians are preparing themselves to strike military targets in Europe with conventional weapons, and if that doesn't work, they will use nuclear weapons. Now, Putin of course has not said this, but Sergei Karaganov has famously made this argument in the West. And if you read the Russian media carefully, there are all sorts of people inside of Russia whoagree with Karaganov, (90%)that it's time for the Russians to take off the gloves. Look, the perspective from Moscow goes, it's the West plus Ukraine that is responsible for these attacks on the Russian homeland. It's not just Ukraine. Ukraine could not do this by itself. It's the West, and that includes President Trump. Indeed, The Kyiv Independent, a major newspaper inside of Kyiv, just had a big story that said that President Trump has basically sanctioned this, bombing campaign that Ukraine is engaged in. And in fact, The Kyiv Independent was saying it's not just the Europeans plus the Ukrainians against the Russians, it's the Ukrainians, the Europeans, and the Americans against the Russians. President Trump is back on the side of the Ukrainians.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

108,558 views • 2 months ago

🚨If that Doesn't Work, They Will Use NUCLEAR WEAPONS 🚨John Mearsheimer: Russia's RED LINES Have Been CROSSED 🚨There is lots of evidence that the Russians are preparing themselves to strike military targets in Europe with conventional weapons, and if that doesn't work, they will use nuclear weapons. Now, Putin of course has not said this, but Sergei Karaganov has famously made this argument in the West. And if you read the Russian media carefully, there are all sorts of people inside of Russia whoagree with Karaganov, (90%)that it's time for the Russians to take off the gloves. Look, the perspective from Moscow goes, it's the West plus Ukraine that is responsible for these attacks on the Russian homeland. It's not just Ukraine. Ukraine could not do this by itself. It's the West, and that includes President Trump. Indeed, The Kyiv Independent, a major newspaper inside of Kyiv, just had a big story that said that President Trump has basically sanctioned this, bombing campaign that Ukraine is engaged in. And in fact, The Kyiv Independent was saying it's not just the Europeans plus the Ukrainians against the Russians, it's the Ukrainians, the Europeans, and the Americans against the Russians. President Trump is back on the side of the Ukrainians.
4:33

🚨If that Doesn't Work, They Will Use NUCLEAR WEAPONS 🚨John Mearsheimer: Russia's RED LINES Have Been CROSSED 🚨There is lots of evidence that the Russians are preparing themselves to strike military targets in Europe with conventional weapons, and if that doesn't work, they will use nuclear weapons. Now, Putin of course has not said this, but Sergei Karaganov has famously made this argument in the West. And if you read the Russian media carefully, there are all sorts of people inside of Russia whoagree with Karaganov, (90%)that it's time for the Russians to take off the gloves. Look, the perspective from Moscow goes, it's the West plus Ukraine that is responsible for these attacks on the Russian homeland. It's not just Ukraine. Ukraine could not do this by itself. It's the West, and that includes President Trump. Indeed, The Kyiv Independent, a major newspaper inside of Kyiv, just had a big story that said that President Trump has basically sanctioned this, bombing campaign that Ukraine is engaged in. And in fact, The Kyiv Independent was saying it's not just the Europeans plus the Ukrainians against the Russians, it's the Ukrainians, the Europeans, and the Americans against the Russians. President Trump is back on the side of the Ukrainians.

THE ISLANDER

26,886 views • 2 months ago

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.
1:11

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Clash Report

46,958 views • 2 months ago

Fox News’ Peter Doocy: “We don’t know what has changed, but President Trump—I just saw a clip of the interview… that they taped for Lara Trump’s show Saturday. He doubles down, he does not care about the midterms.” “Scott Bessent, today, said that makes him a statesman, because he has one core belief and it’s not letting Iran get a nuke. It seems that’s what they are going with so that has to be part of whatever this is. We just know what the red lines are, we don’t know how close we are to them.” Larry Kudlow: “He’s been unwavering… And when he says he doesn’t care about the midterms—I don’t know—I believe him.”
1:07

Fox News’ Peter Doocy: “We don’t know what has changed, but President Trump—I just saw a clip of the interview… that they taped for Lara Trump’s show Saturday. He doubles down, he does not care about the midterms.” “Scott Bessent, today, said that makes him a statesman, because he has one core belief and it’s not letting Iran get a nuke. It seems that’s what they are going with so that has to be part of whatever this is. We just know what the red lines are, we don’t know how close we are to them.” Larry Kudlow: “He’s been unwavering… And when he says he doesn’t care about the midterms—I don’t know—I believe him.”

RedWave Press

119,767 views • 3 months ago

Tucker Carlson warns Donald Trump may use nuclear weapons: ‘So if you’ve reached the end of your conventional power, what’s that a euphemism for? Nuclear weapons. Life in Iran won’t be possible. You wipe out a country of 92 million people. What about the 7 countries directly across the Persian Gulf who are US allies? Would a nuclear strike be followed by peace? Probably not. The US is not the only country in the world with nuclear weapons. You could have a global nuclear war.’
1:37

Tucker Carlson warns Donald Trump may use nuclear weapons: ‘So if you’ve reached the end of your conventional power, what’s that a euphemism for? Nuclear weapons. Life in Iran won’t be possible. You wipe out a country of 92 million people. What about the 7 countries directly across the Persian Gulf who are US allies? Would a nuclear strike be followed by peace? Probably not. The US is not the only country in the world with nuclear weapons. You could have a global nuclear war.’

Afshin Rattansi

27,328 views • 4 months ago

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.
0:43

"VLADIMIR PUTIN'S NUCLEAR WARNING TO EUROPE" Putin delivered a warning to those European countries who’ve been supporting Ukraine. He knows that Russia cannot win a conventional war against NATO. For this reason, he threatens Europe and NATO with nuclear weapons. In a nuclear war, there are no winners, only losers. I see it as unlikely that Putin would carry out a major nuclear attack on Europe as it would lead to total destruction for Russia as well. 📌Putin: "Russia’s has “many more tactical nuclear weapons than there are on the European continent, even if the United States brings theirs over" “Europe does not have a developed early warning system“ "In this sense they are more or less defenceless" Putin is exaggerating a bit here and he's not really sticking to the truth. Russia and the United States maintain robust, independent ballistic missile early warning systems capable of detecting intercontinental and intermediate-range launches. Putin is right there...... Europe as a whole does not have a fully independent, sovereign space-based early warning system yet, but it is far from defenseless. NATO, which includes most European countries integrates with U.S. early warning assets, including upgraded early warning radars in Europe and shared data from U.S. systems. France and the UK also have their own national nuclear deterrents and contribute to alliance warning capabilities.

Global Strategy

32,658 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸🇷🇺 "IF RUSSIA ARMED VENEZUELA DURING A U.S. INVASION, WASHINGTON WOULD CALL IT AN ACT OF WAR - BUT IT’S JUST AID IN UKRAINE" More weapons, more red lines crossed, and still no nuclear retaliation. But what if the roles were reversed? Would Washington tolerate what Moscow has? Or has the West redefined the rules of escalation only when it benefits them? "The U.S. has directly fired ballistic missiles into Russia, imagine if that happened the other way around. Every supposed red line has been crossed, including strikes deep inside Russian territory. If Russia and China armed Venezuela during a U.S. invasion, Washington would call it an act of war. The U.S. would absolutely be on a nuclear slope if its cities were under nightly drone attacks. This is not restraint, it's selective outrage dressed as strategy." Mark Sleboda
4:07

🇺🇸🇷🇺 "IF RUSSIA ARMED VENEZUELA DURING A U.S. INVASION, WASHINGTON WOULD CALL IT AN ACT OF WAR - BUT IT’S JUST AID IN UKRAINE" More weapons, more red lines crossed, and still no nuclear retaliation. But what if the roles were reversed? Would Washington tolerate what Moscow has? Or has the West redefined the rules of escalation only when it benefits them? "The U.S. has directly fired ballistic missiles into Russia, imagine if that happened the other way around. Every supposed red line has been crossed, including strikes deep inside Russian territory. If Russia and China armed Venezuela during a U.S. invasion, Washington would call it an act of war. The U.S. would absolutely be on a nuclear slope if its cities were under nightly drone attacks. This is not restraint, it's selective outrage dressed as strategy." Mark Sleboda

Mario Nawfal

77,097 views • 8 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The threat of a nuclear "red line" being crossed is no longer just a hypothetical scenario. General Wesley Clark admits that Iran building a nuke right now would be a "rational response" to seeing the U.S. and Israel push them into a corner. Gen. Clark suggested there's finally no reason to be in doubt about what Iran's nuclear ambitions are. "I wouldn't be surprised if Iran is building a nuke right now." Wes Clark
2:19

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The threat of a nuclear "red line" being crossed is no longer just a hypothetical scenario. General Wesley Clark admits that Iran building a nuke right now would be a "rational response" to seeing the U.S. and Israel push them into a corner. Gen. Clark suggested there's finally no reason to be in doubt about what Iran's nuclear ambitions are. "I wouldn't be surprised if Iran is building a nuke right now." Wes Clark

Mario Nawfal

29,464 views • 3 months ago

🤡🇪🇺🇬🇧🇺🇦☢️🚀🇷🇺 “If Europe does not stop what it calls a senseless war in Ukraine, Russia may strike the continent with nuclear weapons within one or two years — first and foremost Germany or the United Kingdom,” said Sergei Karaganov, one of the Kremlin’s chief ideologues and honorary chairman of the Presidium of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, during a program hosted by Tucker Carlson. ◾️ “Europe will be erased from the map of humanity. It must be removed from the geopolitical and geostrategic map, because it serves only as a disruptive factor.” ◾️ “These idiots understand nothing except physical pain. Sooner or later, we will have to climb the escalation ladder. We will have to strike Europe with conventional weapons, and the next step will be waves of nuclear strikes.” ◾️ “I believe Putin thinks the use of nuclear weapons is a sin — incidentally, I think so too. But it may be a necessary sin in order to save humanity.” ◾️ “If we strike the Polish city of Poznań, the Americans will not respond under any circumstances. My choice would be Britain and Germany. Incidentally, the Poles are becoming more rational. They understand they are playing with fire and are trying to pull back from the front lines of this conflict. But my choice would be Britain and Germany. I pray to Almighty God that this does not happen, but Germany should be first, because Germany is the greatest historical source of evil in Europe.” 🟧 According to Sergey Karaganov, if Russia does not use nuclear weapons against Europe at a limited level, the world will move toward World War III — a path, he claims, that Europeans themselves are pushing everyone toward. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE
0:20

🤡🇪🇺🇬🇧🇺🇦☢️🚀🇷🇺 “If Europe does not stop what it calls a senseless war in Ukraine, Russia may strike the continent with nuclear weapons within one or two years — first and foremost Germany or the United Kingdom,” said Sergei Karaganov, one of the Kremlin’s chief ideologues and honorary chairman of the Presidium of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, during a program hosted by Tucker Carlson. ◾️ “Europe will be erased from the map of humanity. It must be removed from the geopolitical and geostrategic map, because it serves only as a disruptive factor.” ◾️ “These idiots understand nothing except physical pain. Sooner or later, we will have to climb the escalation ladder. We will have to strike Europe with conventional weapons, and the next step will be waves of nuclear strikes.” ◾️ “I believe Putin thinks the use of nuclear weapons is a sin — incidentally, I think so too. But it may be a necessary sin in order to save humanity.” ◾️ “If we strike the Polish city of Poznań, the Americans will not respond under any circumstances. My choice would be Britain and Germany. Incidentally, the Poles are becoming more rational. They understand they are playing with fire and are trying to pull back from the front lines of this conflict. But my choice would be Britain and Germany. I pray to Almighty God that this does not happen, but Germany should be first, because Germany is the greatest historical source of evil in Europe.” 🟧 According to Sergey Karaganov, if Russia does not use nuclear weapons against Europe at a limited level, the world will move toward World War III — a path, he claims, that Europeans themselves are pushing everyone toward. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

48,248 views • 7 months ago

⚡️🚨 Russia Will Nuke Germany & the UK if Ukraine War Continues, Warns Top Putin Advisor UK has been sabotaging that war since old Boris. Russia sends terrifying nuclear WW3 threat to UK – ‘You will be finished’ Sergey Karaganov, head of Russia’s Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, has threatened to 'finish' the UK and Europe with nuclear weapons “Everybody in the world now laughs at Europe, which used to be, by the way, one of the core centers of world power," he said. "Now it’s a joke. And of course, I am not speaking of all Europe. We know that there are decent Europeans. There are smart Europeans.” Karagnov claimed European were “unable to understand what is happening fully” as the continent has been “intellectually degrading” since 1968. “They believe that war will never come to their territory. They forgot about the war and that it’s terrible,” he said. “Now, one of the tasks of Russia in addition to all others is to bring them to senses hopefully without using nuclear weapons.”
4:38

⚡️🚨 Russia Will Nuke Germany & the UK if Ukraine War Continues, Warns Top Putin Advisor UK has been sabotaging that war since old Boris. Russia sends terrifying nuclear WW3 threat to UK – ‘You will be finished’ Sergey Karaganov, head of Russia’s Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, has threatened to 'finish' the UK and Europe with nuclear weapons “Everybody in the world now laughs at Europe, which used to be, by the way, one of the core centers of world power," he said. "Now it’s a joke. And of course, I am not speaking of all Europe. We know that there are decent Europeans. There are smart Europeans.” Karagnov claimed European were “unable to understand what is happening fully” as the continent has been “intellectually degrading” since 1968. “They believe that war will never come to their territory. They forgot about the war and that it’s terrible,” he said. “Now, one of the tasks of Russia in addition to all others is to bring them to senses hopefully without using nuclear weapons.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

16,403 views • 7 months ago

Trump will finish what JFK started… He spoke with Putin & Xi about denuclearization, but with nuclear weapons, the significance is the country that was not mentioned a single time. “What if China, Russia and others are coordinating w/ others to eliminate the NWO?” (They are.)
3:54

Trump will finish what JFK started… He spoke with Putin & Xi about denuclearization, but with nuclear weapons, the significance is the country that was not mentioned a single time. “What if China, Russia and others are coordinating w/ others to eliminate the NWO?” (They are.)

ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

36,914 views • 10 months ago

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,638 views • 2 years ago

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”
0:47

Ken Griffin on President Trump striking Iran: “With this war, I believe the president has done a great service to humanity by curtailing and containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The combination of the strikes on their nuclear facilities last year, this strike or this war this year has set back Iran’s nuclear ambitions by years, if not a decade or more. And a nuclear-free Middle East is really important both to regional security and ultimately to the security of Western countries, Europe or the United States, which could be impacted by a nuclear warhead in the wrong hands. And I think we should be very thankful that the president has really worked hard to contain the nuclear ambitions of the Iranian people.”

Ryan Saavedra

18,751 views • 3 months ago

Arestovich on Ukraine's attack yesterday not just on Putin's residence, but on a "nuclear decision-making center": According to Western sources, there was a strike. I'm not saying this; they're saying this. Secondly, it wasn't just a residence. It was a special Russian facility designed to command and control the Russian armed forces in the event of a nuclear war. So, in terms of significance, it's like someone attacking Air Force One, the US presidential plane. It's a special facility, an entire city with outdoor structures, underground structures. And all sorts of communication hubs. According to Western sources, drones were flying. 90 or 91, no one knows. But they were most likely targeting the communication hubs. They're verifying this information. And frankly, they didn't reach their destination. But there was a strike. Why are Russians so outraged? Well, because it was a strike on the command center of the nuclear triad and the Russian armed forces in general during a special period, during a large-scale war. That is, this is an attack on the holy of holies, and according to Russian nuclear doctrine, and the nuclear doctrine of any state possessing nuclear weapons, this is grounds for a nuclear response. Russia will not strike Kyiv with tactical nuclear weapons. This would be a sharp escalation, a change in the entire international framework. They won't agree to that. But the "Oreshnik" missile could land. I think it's almost 100% certain that ballistic missiles will hit the decision-making center. "POOL N3"
1:30

Arestovich on Ukraine's attack yesterday not just on Putin's residence, but on a "nuclear decision-making center": According to Western sources, there was a strike. I'm not saying this; they're saying this. Secondly, it wasn't just a residence. It was a special Russian facility designed to command and control the Russian armed forces in the event of a nuclear war. So, in terms of significance, it's like someone attacking Air Force One, the US presidential plane. It's a special facility, an entire city with outdoor structures, underground structures. And all sorts of communication hubs. According to Western sources, drones were flying. 90 or 91, no one knows. But they were most likely targeting the communication hubs. They're verifying this information. And frankly, they didn't reach their destination. But there was a strike. Why are Russians so outraged? Well, because it was a strike on the command center of the nuclear triad and the Russian armed forces in general during a special period, during a large-scale war. That is, this is an attack on the holy of holies, and according to Russian nuclear doctrine, and the nuclear doctrine of any state possessing nuclear weapons, this is grounds for a nuclear response. Russia will not strike Kyiv with tactical nuclear weapons. This would be a sharp escalation, a change in the entire international framework. They won't agree to that. But the "Oreshnik" missile could land. I think it's almost 100% certain that ballistic missiles will hit the decision-making center. "POOL N3"

Victor vicktop55 commentary

78,894 views • 8 months ago