Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Cursor— Codex-5.2 Extra-High vs Opus 4.6 Max’ı Google Earth Mini task’ı ile kıyasladım🔥 Hata: - Opus hatasız tek seferde tamamladı 🎉 Codex 2 kez hatalı yazdı. 👎🏻 Hız: - Codex 10 dakikada yazdı 🎉 Opus 19 dakikada 👎🏻 Agentic Coding; - Opus hiçbir müdahale ve plan olmadan fazlara bölüp...

AlicanKiraz0's profile picture

Alican Kiraz

26,401 subscribers

49,381 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Codex 5.3 EXTRA HIGH ve Claude Opus 4.6'yı ringe çıkardım. Sonuç gerçekten çok acayip. Genelde "Extra High" ayarı açınca modellerin kaplumbağaya dönmesini beklersiniz değil mi? Ben de öyle sanıyordum. İki tarafa da birebir aynı promptu verdim, tek bir virgül bile değiştirmedim. Claude'u yeni gelen "agent team" özelliğiyle sahaya sürdüm, Codex'i ise kendi app'i içinde agent ile başlattım. Kenara çekilip kahvemi aldım, izliyorum. Claude paşa paşa çalıştı, işini 22 dakikada bitirdi. Ama Codex? Codex resmen şov yaptı. Extra High modunda olmasına rağmen 14 dakikada görevi tamamladı. Arada 8 dakika fark var, boru değil. Hız konusunda bu kadar fark olacağını hiç beklemiyordum. Video aşağıda, iki tarafın da performansını karşılaştırın. Sizin düşünceleriniz ne? Sol Video Opus 4.6, Sağ Video Codex 5.3 Extra High
0:46

Codex 5.3 EXTRA HIGH ve Claude Opus 4.6'yı ringe çıkardım. Sonuç gerçekten çok acayip. Genelde "Extra High" ayarı açınca modellerin kaplumbağaya dönmesini beklersiniz değil mi? Ben de öyle sanıyordum. İki tarafa da birebir aynı promptu verdim, tek bir virgül bile değiştirmedim. Claude'u yeni gelen "agent team" özelliğiyle sahaya sürdüm, Codex'i ise kendi app'i içinde agent ile başlattım. Kenara çekilip kahvemi aldım, izliyorum. Claude paşa paşa çalıştı, işini 22 dakikada bitirdi. Ama Codex? Codex resmen şov yaptı. Extra High modunda olmasına rağmen 14 dakikada görevi tamamladı. Arada 8 dakika fark var, boru değil. Hız konusunda bu kadar fark olacağını hiç beklemiyordum. Video aşağıda, iki tarafın da performansını karşılaştırın. Sizin düşünceleriniz ne? Sol Video Opus 4.6, Sağ Video Codex 5.3 Extra High

Baha Gökce

17,863 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 still make stupid decisions
6:19

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 still make stupid decisions

Mo

65,361 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 just launched, so I did a hexagon test on both of them Opus 4.6 - 1M context - great for research + enterprise work - agent teams + long-range reasoning - weaker on raw code benchmarks Codex 5.3 - wins coding benchmarks - faster + mid-task steering - smaller context window TLDR: Opus = depth + orchestration Codex = speed + code
0:20

Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 just launched, so I did a hexagon test on both of them Opus 4.6 - 1M context - great for research + enterprise work - agent teams + long-range reasoning - weaker on raw code benchmarks Codex 5.3 - wins coding benchmarks - faster + mid-task steering - smaller context window TLDR: Opus = depth + orchestration Codex = speed + code

Abhinav

447,814 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

It’s time for another Counter-Strike benchmark: GPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.6 Opus:
0:39

It’s time for another Counter-Strike benchmark: GPT 5.3 Codex and Claude 4.6 Opus:

Instant

18,895 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10
0:30

Selamlar Dostlar, dün GPT 5.4 yayınlandı ve birçok yüksek benchmark metriğiyle geldi. Bende Cursor'da GPT 5.4-High'ı ve Opus 4.6 High'ı kıyasladım. Detaylı prompt'u yorumlara ekleyeceğim. Gördüğüm en önemli GPT 5.4 coding skills değişiklikleri; - Kodu yazarken oldukça sistematik ilerliyor. Planlamaya otomatik geçiriyor. - Tekte doğru kodu yazma yine sıkıntılı 5.3'de olduğu gibi. Ama bunun önüne test ortamı implementasyonu ile geçmişler. Model kodu yazarken sık sık ek kontroller yapıp kodu düzenliyor. Ama bu fazla token yakmaya neden olabilir! - Python'da otomatik venv ortamı kurup orada işlemlerini yapıp çalıştırıyor. Sonuçlar ve Gemini Pro'nun Analizleri; - Hız: Opus 4.6-High 12:32 dakika'da, GPT 5.4-High 12:40 dakika'da tamamladı. - Toplam Satır: GPT: 1497 vs Opus: 1270 - Class Sayısı: GPT: 14 vs Opus: 13 - Çözünürlük: GPT: 1600×900 vs Opus: 800×600 - FPS: GPT: 120 vs Opus: 60 - Görsel Kalite: GPT: 9.2 / 10 vs Opus: 6.5 / 10 - Ses / Audio: GPT: 8.5 / 10 vs Opus: 7.8 / 10 - Kod Kalitesi: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.5 / 10 - Feature Tamamlanma: GPT: 9.5 / 10 vs Opus: 8.0 / 10 - Mimari / Tasarım: GPT: 9.0 / 10 vs Opus: 7.0 / 10

Alican Kiraz

29,369 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.
3:53

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

58,811 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dostlar Selamlar 🙏🏻 Cursor’da Opus 4.5 thinking-high, gemini-3-pro, gpt-5-pro, kimi-k2, grok-4 fast’i kıyasladım. Promptlarada ekten ulaşabilirsiniz 🙏🏻🧡 Bence kazanan Opus 4.5 🔥 Stage 1: Basic - Grok-4 Fast / 9 sec, wrote 57 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 10 sec, wrote 70 lines. - Gemini-3 Pro / 36 seconds, wrote 107 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 40 sec, wrote 88 lines. - ChatGPT-5 Pro / 3m 31 sec, wrote 85 lines. Stage 2 : Complex - Grok-4-Fast / 14 sec, wrote 129 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 19 sec, wrote 127 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 21 sec, wrote 156 lines. - Gemini 3 Pro / 38 sec, wrote 127 lines. - GPT-5 Pro / 5m 57 sec, wrote 166 lines. Stage 3: Hard - Gemini 3 Pro / 39 sec, 212 satır yazdı. - Opus 4.5 / 2m 4 sec, 724 satır yazdı. - Grok-4-Fast / 2m 13 sec, 195 satır yazdı. - Kimi K2 / Crash Loop - - GPT-5 Pro / Kill - 30-40 minutes
8:53

Dostlar Selamlar 🙏🏻 Cursor’da Opus 4.5 thinking-high, gemini-3-pro, gpt-5-pro, kimi-k2, grok-4 fast’i kıyasladım. Promptlarada ekten ulaşabilirsiniz 🙏🏻🧡 Bence kazanan Opus 4.5 🔥 Stage 1: Basic - Grok-4 Fast / 9 sec, wrote 57 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 10 sec, wrote 70 lines. - Gemini-3 Pro / 36 seconds, wrote 107 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 40 sec, wrote 88 lines. - ChatGPT-5 Pro / 3m 31 sec, wrote 85 lines. Stage 2 : Complex - Grok-4-Fast / 14 sec, wrote 129 lines. - Kimi-K2 / 19 sec, wrote 127 lines. - Opus 4.5 / 21 sec, wrote 156 lines. - Gemini 3 Pro / 38 sec, wrote 127 lines. - GPT-5 Pro / 5m 57 sec, wrote 166 lines. Stage 3: Hard - Gemini 3 Pro / 39 sec, 212 satır yazdı. - Opus 4.5 / 2m 4 sec, 724 satır yazdı. - Grok-4-Fast / 2m 13 sec, 195 satır yazdı. - Kimi K2 / Crash Loop - - GPT-5 Pro / Kill - 30-40 minutes

Alican Kiraz

14,936 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Finally did the "opus vs codex" video I've been thinking about for months. tl;dr - I use both every day, and I think you should too.
54:09

Finally did the "opus vs codex" video I've been thinking about for months. tl;dr - I use both every day, and I think you should too.

Theo - t3.gg

146,617 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

OpenClaw creator on Opus vs Codex: “Opus is like the coworker that is a little silly sometimes, but it's really funny and you keep him around. Codex is like the weirdo in the corner that you don't want to talk to, but he's reliable and gets shit done.” LMAO. Accurate.
1:15

OpenClaw creator on Opus vs Codex: “Opus is like the coworker that is a little silly sometimes, but it's really funny and you keep him around. Codex is like the weirdo in the corner that you don't want to talk to, but he's reliable and gets shit done.” LMAO. Accurate.

Bilawal Sidhu

429,731 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.
0:23

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

BridgeMind

52,868 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."
1:47

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

442,658 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

What's better than Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 Codex? Running them all, in parallel, with a single GitHub Copilot subscription. And all of this shipped just this week.
0:29

What's better than Claude Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 Codex? Running them all, in parallel, with a single GitHub Copilot subscription. And all of this shipped just this week.

Martin Woodward

65,561 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

- ผมไม่ชอบโดนหักหลัง มัน👎🏻👎🏻 ((-100)) - คุณคิดว่าผมจะรักคุณจริงหรอ 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 ((-10000000000)) แล้วจิระร้องไห้เป็นสายน้ำเลยยย หัวใจคนเป็นแม่มันเจ็บนัก #BurnoutSyndromeSeriesEP6
1:10

- ผมไม่ชอบโดนหักหลัง มัน👎🏻👎🏻 ((-100)) - คุณคิดว่าผมจะรักคุณจริงหรอ 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 ((-10000000000)) แล้วจิระร้องไห้เป็นสายน้ำเลยยย หัวใจคนเป็นแม่มันเจ็บนัก #BurnoutSyndromeSeriesEP6

OFFGUN_FAMILY

779,278 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

للأسف يا بدر الي شار عليك انك تظهر بهذا المظهر ما يبيلك الخير كان بالإمكان افضل من هذا الظهور 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
0:39

للأسف يا بدر الي شار عليك انك تظهر بهذا المظهر ما يبيلك الخير كان بالإمكان افضل من هذا الظهور 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

ضمير الرياضه 🤙🏻 نصار المهيني 🤍

1,906,128 просмотров • 1 год назад

طلعو الموظف أجل ؟ خذ ديسلايكااات 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
0:24

طلعو الموظف أجل ؟ خذ ديسلايكااات 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

شَكّة

409,798 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

How it feels to give a task to Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 in parallel to see which one can better blast through 3 months of human work in 5 mins
0:24

How it feels to give a task to Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 in parallel to see which one can better blast through 3 months of human work in 5 mins

Beff (e/acc)

28,349 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode
0:54

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode

Harshith

46,632 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

#النصر_الهلال 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 والله اذا ماطيروه قبل النخبه باي باي اسيا النخبه تذكروها
2:09

Sensitive content

#النصر_الهلال 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻 والله اذا ماطيروه قبل النخبه باي باي اسيا النخبه تذكروها

༄ ثاني العالم Otaibi خالد༄💙

33,661 просмотров • 1 год назад