Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I tested Gemini 3.8 Flash on the SAME EXACT Mario Kart prompt that I tested Fable 5.1 on yesterday. Google disappoints yet again.

bridgemindai's profile picture

BridgeMind

55,425 subscribers

65,317 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?
0:12

I tested again Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 same prompt: a family having lunch in 3D. Qwen 3.8 wins again for me on quality. but Gemini finished in under 2 mins, the others took 6+. Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

71,444 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?
0:14

I tested Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen 3.8 vs Grok 4.6 vs GLM 5.3 Same prompt, 2 scenes: a harvester and farmers working. honestly? Qwen 3.8 impressed me. it just did what I asked. Grok 4.6 failed on coloring. Qwen>GLM> Grok> Gemini which one did better for you?

Bhavy☄️

110,316 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵
0:13

I tested Qwen 3.8 vs Fable 5 Both were made with Renoise CLI. Which output do you like better? Prompt in thread 🧵

Kiki

114,297 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Tested Fugu-ultra on the questions that break most of the AI: - how many r's in strawberry - is 5.11 bigger than 5.1 - the famous car/wash question (Twice) I think we just got Fable Back
0:10

Tested Fugu-ultra on the questions that break most of the AI: - how many r's in strawberry - is 5.11 bigger than 5.1 - the famous car/wash question (Twice) I think we just got Fable Back

Ziwen

188,692 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?
0:15

🚨Gemini 3.6 Flash is trash I tested it on a 3D Golden Gate Bridge, and the results were awful. • I had to re-prompt it three times because it repeatedly ignored the instructions. • First attempt, instead of creating the requested .html file, it first tried to build the experience inside the Gemini app using simulations. • Then second attempt it started placing images from the web into the chat rather than actually producing the file. • Even after getting it to complete the task, the final output was dramatically worse than Gemini 3.1 Pro, which is 5 months old and now not even a top 10 model on leaderboards. This feels like a regression from Gemini 3.5 Flash and honestly, it is one of the weakest models I have tested in the past few months. Has anyone else tested Gemini 3.6 Flash yet, and are you seeing the same thing?

Lumina

72,213 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?
0:20

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

145,921 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Everyone says “Gemini 3 can make games.” So we tested it — with a Metal Slug-style prompt on both Gemini and Gambo. Same input. Completely different output. Here’s the result. #gemini3 #gemini_for_game
0:24

Everyone says “Gemini 3 can make games.” So we tested it — with a Metal Slug-style prompt on both Gemini and Gambo. Same input. Completely different output. Here’s the result. #gemini3 #gemini_for_game

gambo.ai

96,044 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

GOOGLE HAS BEEN FAILING PRETTY BADLY TO PUT OUT A MODEL THAT CAN ACTUALLY HANG WITH THE BEST LATELY tested Gemini 3.8 Flash against Kimi K3 on the same Sticky Ball game Flash was insanely fast and used way fewer tokens, but the actual game was nowhere close. K3 had much better mechanics, movement, and overall game design Flash clearly has the speed and efficiency part down, but the gap in what it can actually build is pretty big
0:14

GOOGLE HAS BEEN FAILING PRETTY BADLY TO PUT OUT A MODEL THAT CAN ACTUALLY HANG WITH THE BEST LATELY tested Gemini 3.8 Flash against Kimi K3 on the same Sticky Ball game Flash was insanely fast and used way fewer tokens, but the actual game was nowhere close. K3 had much better mechanics, movement, and overall game design Flash clearly has the speed and efficiency part down, but the gap in what it can actually build is pretty big

aditya

131,250 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

The drowned neo-gothic tower twigl shader created by Fable 5.1 with the same prompt. (compare to Fable 5 in the quoted tweet, and other models before that)
0:12

The drowned neo-gothic tower twigl shader created by Fable 5.1 with the same prompt. (compare to Fable 5 in the quoted tweet, and other models before that)

Ethan Mollick

192,187 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

I tested Kling 2.6 Motion Control head-to-head against other video models. Same prompt. Same reference. Kling outperformed across the board. Here’s why: 👇
0:10

I tested Kling 2.6 Motion Control head-to-head against other video models. Same prompt. Same reference. Kling outperformed across the board. Here’s why: 👇

Rishabh

131,196 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Seedance 2.0 vs Sora 2 ⚔️ I tested the same prompt with Ghibli aesthetics. The results speak for themselves. Quick breakdown below 👇
0:14

Seedance 2.0 vs Sora 2 ⚔️ I tested the same prompt with Ghibli aesthetics. The results speak for themselves. Quick breakdown below 👇

Framer 🇱🇹

104,132 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Tested out the Blender 5.1 Alpha hair physics nodes on a cape and fringe. #geometrynodes #b3d #blender
0:11

Tested out the Blender 5.1 Alpha hair physics nodes on a cape and fringe. #geometrynodes #b3d #blender

Michael

4,007,079 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • OpenAI Sora • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same prompt that I used to generate this image in Midjourney and chose the best results for each model tested. The prompt didn't include specific camera motion, so it was interesting to see each model's interpretation:
0:10

Video Model Comparison: Image2Video Same input image + text prompt on each model: • Pika 2.0 • OpenAI Sora • Runway Gen-3 • Kling AI 1.6 • Luma Dream Machine • Hailuo MiniMax I used the same prompt that I used to generate this image in Midjourney and chose the best results for each model tested. The prompt didn't include specific camera motion, so it was interesting to see each model's interpretation:

Heather Cooper

63,079 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Google spent billions of dollars on Gemini Omni. It still can't make a person do a backflip. I tested it → Asked Gemini to generate a backflip → Physics was broken → Body looked wrong → Tried 3 times. Same result. A billion-dollar model. One simple move. Still failing. Don't trust the hype. Test everything yourself. Bookmark this. Comment on your worst AI fail.
0:10

Google spent billions of dollars on Gemini Omni. It still can't make a person do a backflip. I tested it → Asked Gemini to generate a backflip → Physics was broken → Body looked wrong → Tried 3 times. Same result. A billion-dollar model. One simple move. Still failing. Don't trust the hype. Test everything yourself. Bookmark this. Comment on your worst AI fail.

The Whizz AI

66,579 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?
0:17

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna tested both models with the same prompt on highest reasoning > luna one shotted everything in under 3 mins in devin > v4 Flash needed an extra prompt to fix the movement and took over 5 mins in aihubmix cli which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

47,629 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

What I think when the say makeup tested on animals 😭
0:12

What I think when the say makeup tested on animals 😭

ɴɪᴀ ꜱʜᴀʀᴍᴀ 💅

559,419 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Vibe coder extraordinaire Riley Brown tested all the AI coding tools with the same prompt and found that Replit is the best 🥇
0:19

Vibe coder extraordinaire Riley Brown tested all the AI coding tools with the same prompt and found that Replit is the best 🥇

Amjad Masad

94,674 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Claude feels kinda overhyped tbh. I tested the same website design prompt on both Gemini and Claude many times. And every time Claude’s output wasn’t even close to the original. Meanwhile, Gemini got almost identical results, and after a few tweaks, it hit ~99% accuracy. Makes me wonder… maybe models just perform better on ecosystems they’re trained closer to? 🤔 Either way, Gemini is seriously outperforming in frontend dev right now. Remix:
0:14

Claude feels kinda overhyped tbh. I tested the same website design prompt on both Gemini and Claude many times. And every time Claude’s output wasn’t even close to the original. Meanwhile, Gemini got almost identical results, and after a few tweaks, it hit ~99% accuracy. Makes me wonder… maybe models just perform better on ecosystems they’re trained closer to? 🤔 Either way, Gemini is seriously outperforming in frontend dev right now. Remix:

The Bugged Dev

31,645 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

AI can generate beautiful game worlds now. But a world is not a game. I tested Kimi K3 in Verdent against GPT-5.6 using the exact same prompt. One created a scene. K3 added real enemies, working combat, and something I could actually play. Watch the difference 🧵
0:17

AI can generate beautiful game worlds now. But a world is not a game. I tested Kimi K3 in Verdent against GPT-5.6 using the exact same prompt. One created a scene. K3 added real enemies, working combat, and something I could actually play. Watch the difference 🧵

Darshal Jaitwar

80,428 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Can you tell the difference? I tested the exact same prompt, same scene, and identical luxury perfume commercial in Seedance 2.0 4k on EaseMate AI_Official , comparing 4K and 1080p output. From the Mediterranean lighting and glass reflections to skin texture and cinematic depth of field, the difference is clear when viewed side by side. Which version would you choose for your next commercial—4K or 1080p? 👇 Prompt in the comments.
0:15

Can you tell the difference? I tested the exact same prompt, same scene, and identical luxury perfume commercial in Seedance 2.0 4k on EaseMate AI_Official , comparing 4K and 1080p output. From the Mediterranean lighting and glass reflections to skin texture and cinematic depth of field, the difference is clear when viewed side by side. Which version would you choose for your next commercial—4K or 1080p? 👇 Prompt in the comments.

Jessica Collins

468,136 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce